The backdrop of this study is significantly alarming. With the ongoing pressure faced by healthcare systems, especially in surgical settings, nurses often find themselves on the frontline, juggling numerous challenges ranging from extreme workload to emotional exhaustion. It is in this high-stakes atmosphere that incidents of mobbing often manifest, impacting not only the individuals involved but also the entire healthcare team and, ultimately, patient care. This research sets out to illuminate how this form of harassment seeps into the daily lives of nurses and the overarching implications it has on their wellbeing.

By employing a qualitative descriptive methodology, the researchers gathered rich narratives from participants, allowing for an in-depth exploration of their experiences. The participants recounted stories of intimidation, discrimination, and social isolation, revealing how these negative interactions contribute significantly to a culture of fear within surgical clinics. The voices of these nurses provide a window into the emotional toll that mobbing takes, with many expressing feelings of helplessness and frustration. This qualitative insight emphasizes the devastating impact that mobbing has not only on individual nurses but also on the collaborative spirit essential in high-performance medical environments.

Interestingly, this study also highlights the systemic issues that perpetuate mobbing behaviors. Leadership and organizational support—or the lack thereof—play crucial roles in either curbing or exacerbating mobbing incidents. The findings indicate a troubling trend where inadequate support systems and a lack of training for management lead to a permissive environment for such behaviors to thrive. This systemic failure, the study argues, not only harms nurses but also compromises patient safety and care quality.

Moreover, the emotional fallout from mobbing can trigger a cascade of negative effects, including job dissatisfaction, increased turnover rates, and a debilitating sense of burnout. Many participating nurses reported a decline in their enthusiasm for their careers, feeling drained by the constant psychological strain. This phenomenon is particularly concerning in surgical clinics, where teamwork and effective communication are critical to patient outcomes. Thus, the implications of mobbing extend beyond the psychological impacts on nurses; they raise questions about patient care and healthcare system efficiency.

Equally important is the study’s exploration of the coping mechanisms that nurses adopt when faced with mobbing. Participants shared varied strategies, ranging from seeking out supportive colleagues to voicing concerns to management—though these latter attempts were often met with indifference. The study contextualizes these coping strategies within the broader challenges of the healthcare workplace, where nurses may feel pressured to remain silent rather than confront their aggressors. This silence only serves to perpetuate the cycle of harassment, as new and emerging nurses may imitate the behaviors they encounter, further embedding mobbing into the workplace culture.

Furthermore, the researchers emphasize the necessity for targeted interventions tailored specifically to address mobbing in nursing. By recognizing the unique challenges faced in surgical clinics, healthcare organizations can foster environments that promote psychological safety and mutual respect. Training programs aimed at developing interpersonal skills, conflict resolution, and awareness of mobbing behaviors could be vital tools in combating this issue. Empowering nurses with strategies to deal with mobbing not only supports their mental health but also transforms workplace culture, ultimately benefiting patient care.

The urgent need for a healthcare system transformation is strongly recommended, where leadership is proactive in establishing zero-tolerance policies toward mobbing. This research underscores the importance of open dialogue within nursing teams, highlighting that a culture of transparency can significantly reduce incidents of harassment. Effective communication channels, where nurses can report their experiences without fear of repercussions, are essential for building trust and ensuring that such behaviors are addressed appropriately.

Additionally, this research sheds light on the role of educational institutions in preparing nurses for handling mobbing. Curriculums should integrate training on emotional intelligence, resilience, and ethical workplace behaviors, thereby equipping future nurses with the tools necessary to navigate the complexities of healthcare environments. By embedding awareness and prevention strategies early in nursing education, the cycle of mobbing could be significantly mitigated, fostering a generation of nurses who prioritize a positive workspace.

Ultimately, Basli and Işikli’s research offers a critical lens on an often-overlooked yet pervasive issue in healthcare—mobbing among nurses. It not only amplifies the voices of those affected but also calls for systemic changes that are essential for improving nurse wellbeing and, by extension, patient care. As healthcare continues to evolve, addressing mobbing and its underlying causes will be crucial in ensuring a sustainable workforce dedicated to delivering high-quality care.

This study stands as a poignant reminder of the importance of safeguarding healthcare professionals’ mental health, especially in high-pressure environments like surgical clinics. The challenges of mobbing demand attention, fostering an environment that promotes respect, understanding, and teamwork. Ultimately, the findings of this qualitative descriptive study pave the way for future inquiries and interventions aimed at eradicating mobbing in nursing, signaling a hopeful shift towards a more compassionate and supportive healthcare system.

Subject of Research: Mobbing among nurses in surgical clinics

Article Title: Experiences of mobbing among nurses working in surgical clinics: a qualitative descriptive study

Article References: Basli, A.A., Işikli, A.G. Experiences of mobbing among nurses working in surgical clinics: a qualitative descriptive study.
BMC Nurs (2026). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-026-04363-y

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1186/s12912-026-04363-y

Keywords: mobbing, nurses, surgical clinics, workplace harassment, mental health, qualitative study, organizational culture, support systems.

Nursing, a profession demanding constant emotional, physical, and psychological resilience, faces global challenges of burnout syndrome—a condition marked by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment. Standard burnout scales such as the Maslach Burnout Inventory have served many countries well, but cultural nuances in work expectations, societal pressures, and healthcare system structures necessitate bespoke tools to truly capture the burnout state in specific populations. The Taiwanese Nurse Burnout Scale emerges as an innovative psychometric instrument meticulously designed with these contextual factors in mind.

The research team approached the scale’s development through rigorous psychometric methodologies. Initially, qualitative exploratory research was conducted to understand the lived experiences, stressors, and manifestations of burnout among Taiwanese nurses. This foundation allowed the crafting of items and domains that directly reflected aspects such as workplace interpersonal conflicts, patient relationships, shift work challenges, and cultural attitudes towards mental health. This approach ensures content validity by rooting the instrument firmly in the target population’s perspectives.

Subsequent quantitative phases involved large-scale survey administration among a representative nursing cohort in Taiwan. Advanced statistical techniques, including exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, were employed to test and refine the scale’s dimensional structure. Reliability statistics such as Cronbach’s alpha indicated strong internal consistency across subscales, validating the stability and coherence of the items. This robustness positions the scale as a dependable tool for research and clinical screening.

Beyond reliability and validity, the study addressed the scale’s diagnostic utility by examining convergent and divergent validity. The Taiwanese Nurse Burnout Scale demonstrated expected correlations with established mental health measures and work-related stress scales. These cross-validations solidify its credibility and adaptability for both academic research and practical workplace assessments, allowing institutions to identify burnout early and devise interventions tailored to their nursing staff’s needs.

Importantly, this scale is both culturally sensitive and language appropriate, factors often overlooked in global mental health assessments. The researchers incorporated Taiwanese linguistic nuances and idiomatic expressions related to work strain and emotional fatigue, enhancing respondent comprehension and accuracy. This sensitivity underscores the importance of contextualizing psychological instruments, especially in non-Western settings where imported measures sometimes fail to capture subtle experiential realities.

The implications of this validated scale stretch far beyond measurement alone. Healthcare administrators can now systematically evaluate burnout prevalence and severity, allowing for evidence-based policy development targeting nurse wellbeing. Interventions such as workload adjustments, peer support programs, and mental health resources can be more precisely implemented and monitored for efficacy. At the national level, this tool can inform workforce planning, helping to retain nursing staff amidst mounting pressures and prevent adverse outcomes like absenteeism and turnover.

Moreover, the Taiwanese Nurse Burnout Scale holds promise for cross-cultural comparative studies. Researchers worldwide can adapt or benchmark this scale against versions used in other countries, facilitating global dialogues about occupational health in nursing. Insights gleaned from such collaborations could shape universal best practices while honoring local differences, ultimately advancing the nursing profession’s sustainability and the quality of healthcare delivery.

In the era of increasing awareness about mental health in frontline professions, this study contributes to a critical paradigm shift. Burnout is no longer perceived as an inevitable byproduct of demanding roles but as a modifiable condition amenable to systematic assessment and intervention. The validation of a localized, psychometrically sound scale empowers stakeholders to move beyond anecdotal recognition toward structured, scalable strategies combating burnout.

Additionally, the study’s methodology showcases state-of-the-art psychometric techniques harnessed explicitly for healthcare settings. Through iterative refinement, including pilot testing, expert panel reviews, and statistical validation, the research team ensured the instrument’s rigor. Such meticulous scholarship not only advances psychological measurement science but sets a benchmark for similar future endeavors in occupational health.

Significantly, this scale provides a platform for longitudinal monitoring. As healthcare systems evolve and new challenges arise, such as technological disruptions or pandemics, continuous evaluation using this tailored tool can track fluctuating burnout trends. This dynamic capability enables timely adaptations in workforce support mechanisms, bolstering resilience in an ever-changing healthcare landscape.

The timing of this publication is propitious, given growing concerns about healthcare staffing crises exacerbated by global health emergencies. With Taiwan’s nursing workforce confronting external pressures from pandemics and internal systemic challenges, the availability of a validated instrument caters directly to urgent needs. This scale’s application could enhance pandemic preparedness by addressing workforce mental health proactively.

In conclusion, the psychometric validation of the Taiwanese Nurse Burnout Scale marks a significant milestone. It embodies a sophisticated blend of cultural cognizance, rigorous scientific methods, and pragmatic relevance. Through this instrument, Taiwanese healthcare stakeholders gain a powerful tool to diagnose, understand, and ultimately mitigate nurse burnout—improving healthcare outcomes and enriching nurses’ professional and personal lives.

Looking forward, the research team emphasizes the need for continual refinement and potential digital adaptation of the scale for ease of deployment. The integration of this tool into routine occupational health surveillance systems could revolutionize how nurse burnout is managed, providing timely feedback loops to healthcare insurers, accrediting bodies, and policymakers.

As this newly validated scale begins its integration into practice, the global nursing community watches closely. If the Taiwanese model’s success proves replicable, it stands to inspire similar culturally anchored instruments worldwide. Beyond Taiwan, this work signals an important evolution in healthcare workforce mental health assessment—one where precision, culture, and compassion converge to create lasting impact.

The findings also prompt consideration about broader psychosocial interventions and workplace culture reforms necessary to sustain nurse wellbeing. Measurement is but the first step; deploying data-driven organizational changes and fostering environments that prioritize mental health will be imperative. The Taiwanese Nurse Burnout Scale thus becomes a catalyst for systemic transformation in health professions.

Ultimately, this research offers hope amid ongoing challenges in healthcare. By illuminating the contours of nurse burnout with a culturally specific lens, it empowers stakeholders to act decisively. It sets a precedent for embedding psychological wellbeing at the core of healthcare systems, ensuring that nurses—who form the backbone of patient care—are supported, valued, and resilient.

Subject of Research: Psychometric validation of a culturally tailored burnout assessment tool for Taiwanese nurses.

Article Title: Psychometric validation of the Taiwanese nurse burnout scale.

Article References:
Meng-Ting, C., Yi-Wen, C., Chung-Ying, L. et al. Psychometric validation of the Taiwanese nurse burnout scale. BMC Psychol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04040-4

Image Credits: AI Generated

One of the critical findings of this study indicates that resilience is not merely an innate characteristic but can be cultivated through targeted interventions and supportive environments. The research team conducted numerous interviews and surveys aimed at identifying the stressors that nurses regularly face in their line of work. Their data suggest that resilience can be significantly enhanced by recognizing the importance of both personal and organizational factors that contribute to a nurse’s capacity to withstand challenges.

Moreover, the researchers have identified that issues such as work overload, emotional exhaustion, and the prevalence of burnout are factors that negatively impact nurses’ resilience levels. The study emphasizes that while some nurses demonstrate exceptional resilience, many struggle in environments that lack adequate support systems. This highlights the importance of workplace culture and organizational support in enhancing the resilience of nursing staff, suggesting a need for systemic changes within healthcare institutions.

By utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the researchers were able to gather both numerical data and personal narratives that provide a deeper context to the numbers. The qualitative data from interviews offered insight into the ways nurses perceive their own resilience and the factors that foster or hinder their ability to cope with stress. This dual methodology allows for a richer and more holistic understanding of the complexities surrounding nurses’ resilience.

The findings also indicate that resilience training programs tailored specifically for nurses could serve as an effective intervention. These programs should not only focus on individual skills but also incorporate elements that address collective resilience within nursing teams. The idea of fostering a sense of community and teamwork could act as a buffer against stress and burnout, making nurses feel more supported in their roles.

Moreover, the data suggest that organizational changes, such as implementing mentorship programs and fostering open communication channels between staff and management, could significantly impact nurses’ resilience. Creating an environment where nurses feel valued and heard is essential in promoting mental well-being and enhancing their capacity to deal with the inherent stresses of the profession.

The research highlights that the emotional toll on nurses, especially in the aftermath of crises like the COVID-19 pandemic, has brought the issue of resilience into sharp focus. During the pandemic, many nurses faced unprecedented levels of stress and demand, further underscoring the importance of resilience and organizational support. Acknowledging these challenges has become crucial in developing strategies for resilience enhancement that are effective and sustainable.

What emerges from this study is not only a reflection on the current state of nurses’ resilience but also a call to action for healthcare organizations to invest in their personnel. The emphasis lies on understanding that nurturing resilience is a reciprocal process that benefits both the nurses and the institutions they serve. By fostering strong, resilient nursing staff, organizations can better navigate the complexities of patient care and healthcare delivery.

In conclusion, the work by Khaleghparast and colleagues serves as a pivotal contribution to the discourse on nursing resilience. The insights gained from this research can be instrumental in guiding policy changes and educational programs within healthcare settings. The integration of resilience-building strategies could lead to improved job satisfaction and retention rates among nurses, ultimately enhancing patient care and the overall healthcare system’s effectiveness.

As we move forward, the challenge will be to implement the findings of this study into practical strategies that resonate with the realities of nursing work. It is vital that healthcare leaders and policymakers recognize the importance of resilience as not just a personal attribute, but a communal necessity that requires structured support and proactive measures.

Addressing resilience truly represents one of the most significant challenges and opportunities facing the nursing profession today. As we continue to explore and explain the intricacies of this vital trait, it is clear that building a resilient workforce is essential for the future of healthcare.

The implications of this research extend beyond the immediate realm of nursing, potentially influencing broader discussions within healthcare systems worldwide. As healthcare paradigms evolve, acknowledging and supporting the resilience of nursing staff will remain at the forefront of creating a sustainable and effective healthcare environment.

Finally, it is imperative for stakeholders at every level—from nurse educators to health administrators—to engage with these findings and work collaboratively to implement change that promotes resilience in nursing practice. In doing so, we not only enhance the well-being of nurses but also ensure a higher standard of care for the populations they serve.

Subject of Research: Resilience among nurses and strategies for its enhancement.

Article Title: Exploring and explaining nurses’ resilience and developing strategies for its enhancement: an explanatory sequential mixed method study.

Article References:

Khaleghparast, S., Nayeri, N.D., Shabani, F. et al. Exploring and explaining nurses’ resilience and developing strategies for its enhancement: an explanatory sequential mixed method study. BMC Nurs (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-04223-1

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI:

Keywords: Resilience, nursing, mixed methods, healthcare, burnout, organizational support.

Burnout, a term frequently discussed in medical literature, is defined as a state of emotional, physical, and mental exhaustion caused by prolonged and excessive stress. Nurses, being at the frontline of patient care, are particularly susceptible to experiencing this debilitating condition, which not only affects their health but also impacts their professional performance. The study found that higher levels of burnout directly correlate with an increased tendency to ration care, raising alarms about the feasibility of delivering adequate patient care in overburdened settings.

Moreover, job satisfaction emerged as another pivotal variable in the study. It encapsulates the fulfillment and contentment nurses derive from their work environment and responsibilities. When job satisfaction is low, nurses are more likely to encounter mental and emotional stressors, which can exacerbate feelings of burnout. This connection points to a vicious cycle where dissatisfaction in the work environment fuels burnout, which in turn leads to decreased quality of care. The implications are profound, especially in light of existing shortages in the nursing workforce across many countries.

Life satisfaction, a broader measure encompassing an individual’s overall evaluation of their life as a whole, played a critical role in mediating these relationships. The study revealed that nurses with higher life satisfaction reported feeling less burned out and were more likely to engage in comprehensive patient care rather than rationing their efforts. This finding underscores the importance of holistic support mechanisms that nurture the overall well-being of healthcare professionals outside of the workplace.

Life orientation, defined as a psychological construct that reflects one’s general outlook on life, was also explored in this research. Nurses exhibiting a positive life orientation tended to report better job and life satisfaction, contributing to lower burnout levels. This suggests that fostering resilience and a positive attitude can be an effective strategy to mitigate burnout among nurses. The impact of a robust social support network and mental health resources cannot be understated, as they can significantly bolster nurses’ coping mechanisms and adaptive strategies.

The study is particularly timely, given the ongoing challenges faced by healthcare systems worldwide. The COVID-19 pandemic, for instance, has exacerbated many existing issues, leading to higher rates of burnout among healthcare workers. As the demand for nursing care surges in many regions, understanding the dynamics of burnout and its repercussions on care rationing is more crucial than ever. This research provides essential insights that could guide organizational policies aimed at improving working conditions and supporting nursing staff.

With an increasing number of healthcare institutions recognizing the importance of nurse well-being, findings from this study could serve as a catalyst for change. By prioritizing job satisfaction and overall life satisfaction, healthcare organizations could mitigate burnout and enhance patient care experiences. Implementing strategies such as flexible scheduling, mental health resources, and professional development opportunities may help alleviate some of the pressures nurses face.

Moreover, the focus on life orientation presents an intriguing avenue for further research. Programs aimed at enhancing psychological resilience might not only improve nurses’ personal lives but could also foster a more compassionate approach to patient care. As healthcare systems grapple with the implications of rationing care, particularly in settings with strained resources, the need for holistic approaches to nursing well-being cannot be overlooked.

Ultimately, the study by Milecka et al. serves as a wake-up call for healthcare policymakers and administrators. The connection between burnout, job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and nursing care rationing is complex yet critical. Acknowledging and addressing these interconnected issues can empower healthcare workers while simultaneously enhancing patient outcomes. If left unaddressed, the cycle of burnout and compromised care stands to threaten the integrity of healthcare systems globally.

In conclusion, as we continue to navigate the challenges within healthcare, the findings of this important research urge us to take action. By understanding the multifaceted impacts of burnout on nursing care rationing, we can forge pathways toward a more supportive and sustainable work environment for nurses. As the very backbone of healthcare, the well-being of nursing professionals should always remain a paramount concern in our collective effort to provide exemplary care.

Subject of Research: The impact of burnout, job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and life orientation on the rationing of nursing care.

Article Title: Impact of burnout, job and life satisfaction, and life orientation on rationing of nursing care: a cross-sectional observational study.

Article References: Milecka, D., Homętowska, H., Manulik, S. et al. Impact of burnout, job and life satisfaction, and life orientation on rationing of nursing care: a cross-sectional observational study.
BMC Nurs (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-04161-y

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI:

Keywords: Burnout, Job satisfaction, Life satisfaction, Life orientation, Nursing care rationing.

In the high-stakes environments of intensive care units (ICUs), nurses are often the unsung heroes battling both the physical and emotional tolls of critical patient care. Recent groundbreaking research presented at the ATS 2025 International Conference in San Francisco highlights a promising intervention that could revolutionize how healthcare institutions support their nursing staff. Embedding a dedicated team therapist within critical care units has been shown to markedly reduce burnout rates, enhance resilience, and improve overall job satisfaction for ICU nurses. This novel approach is poised to alleviate mental health burdens that have long plagued nursing professionals and reshape organizational mental health strategies.

Burnout among critical care nurses is a pervasive and pressing issue, characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and diminished personal accomplishment. The intense mental strain stems not only from managing medically complex patients but also from repeated exposure to trauma, ethical dilemmas, and chronic staffing shortages. Traditional support mechanisms, such as Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) and peer support networks, have often fallen short in addressing these multifaceted stressors. EAPs, despite being readily available, tend to be underutilized by nursing staff, possibly due to stigma or a lack of immediacy in accessing support. Peer support models encounter challenges as the helpers may themselves be deeply affected by similar stressors, leading to constrained efficacy.

The innovative study spearheaded by Julie Graham, PhD, APRN, ACCNS-AG, assistant professor at San Diego State University School of Nursing, zeroed in on an embedded therapist model implemented at Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center, California, during the COVID-19 pandemic. This period is critical to consider, as the pandemic not only strained healthcare systems but also amplified psychological distress among frontline workers. Sharp Chula Vista experienced ICU nursing turnover rates reaching nearly 29%, reflective of the significant emotional breakdowns and mental health crises observed among staff.

In collaboration with hospital leadership and an affiliated mental health institution, the project established a full-time therapist position directly integrated within the critical care team. This embedded professional was not an external resource but rather an intrinsic team member, facilitating immediate, context-sensitive mental health support. By being onsite and continually present, the therapist could cultivate trust, offer real-time interventions, and attune therapeutic strategies to the evolving dynamics of the ICU environment. This contrasts with the episodic and often impersonal nature of traditional external counseling services.

Quantitative data from nurse surveys captured the intervention’s impact, revealing that engagement with the onsite therapist correlated with substantial improvements across key dimensions of nurse wellbeing. Job satisfaction indices increased, while burnout scores declined considerably. Nurses also reported enhanced resilience, an attribute crucial for withstanding prolonged stress without succumbing to despair. Another notable outcome was the elevation in nurses’ self-efficacy regarding mental health management, indicating that these professionals felt more competent in recognizing and addressing their own psychological needs after receiving consistent support.

One of the most striking institutional benefits was the dramatic reduction in nurse turnover following the therapist’s integration. After the therapist role became permanent, turnover plunged from a staggering 29% to as low as 1% at its nadir. While this ultra-low turnover rate was not entirely sustained over time, it remains significantly reduced compared to pre-intervention figures. From an organizational perspective, this translates to substantial cost savings, as the financial implications of recruiting and training replacement nurses are high. Dr. Graham emphasized that the salary of a single therapist could offset expenses incurred by multiple nurse departures, underscoring the intervention’s cost-effectiveness.

The embedded therapist model also addresses a core limitation of peer support systems. While peer supporters bring valuable empathy and relatability, their efficacy can be compromised when they are concurrently managing their own trauma or fatigue. Conversely, a professional therapist is trained in evidence-based psychotherapeutic techniques and maintains clinical boundaries that enable sustained, objective support. This distinction is critical in an ICU setting, where emotional contagion and cumulative trauma can quickly overwhelm informal support networks.

The embedded therapist supports a broad spectrum of mental health needs, employing strategies like cognitive-behavioral interventions, mindfulness-based stress reduction, and trauma-informed care tailored to frontline nursing staff. The immediacy of support not only mitigates acute distress but also fosters preventative mental health care, potentially reducing incidence of more severe psychopathology such as depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This proactive model contrasts with reactionary or crisis-only approaches prevalent in many healthcare systems.

As this model gains traction, the research team is expanding their inquiry through a prospective cohort study in partnership with San Diego State University’s School of Business. This follow-up research aims to quantitatively link the embedded therapist’s presence with additional outcomes including reduced absenteeism, sustained staff retention, and improved patient care metrics. These institutional indicators will provide a more comprehensive understanding of the model’s systemic value and scalability.

The implications of these findings extend beyond critical care nursing, highlighting a paradigm shift in occupational mental health support within healthcare environments. Integrating mental health professionals directly into clinical teams establishes a culture of wellbeing that normalizes psychological care and mitigates stigma barriers. It fosters a sustainable workforce capable of delivering high-quality patient care without succumbing to burnout. This is especially critical as healthcare systems worldwide confront nurse shortages and escalating demands exacerbated by global health crises.

Dr. Graham’s work calls for a reevaluation of traditional employee mental health support frameworks and advocates for widespread adoption of embedded therapist roles. The evidence presented not only argues for the humanitarian imperative to support those who care for the critically ill but also delineates a financially prudent strategy that benefits healthcare organizations holistically. As this intervention garners attention, it is poised to transform institutional approaches to nurse wellbeing, ensuring that these vital healthcare providers receive the support they urgently need in their challenging roles.

Subject of Research: Mental Health Support Interventions for Critical Care Nurses
Article Title: Having a Team Therapist Reduces Burnout in Critical Care Nurses
News Publication Date: May 19, 2025
Web References: https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1164/ajrccm.2025.211.Abstracts.A3142
Image Credits: Julie Graham, PhD, APRN
Keywords: Nursing, Stress management, Mental health, Burnout, Critical care, Therapist support, Nurse wellbeing, Occupational health