<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>emissions scenarios &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/emissions-scenarios/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 01:37:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Wetlands Turn Up the Heat: New Climate Model Adds Natural Methane Feedback</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/wetlands-turn-up-the-heat-new-climate-model-adds-natural-methane-feedback/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 01:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change impact on wetlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate feedback loops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate modeling upgrades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMIP7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynamic methane emission modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth System Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions scenarios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geoscientific Model Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas feedback mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC climate scenarios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MAGICC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MAGICC climate model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural methane emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simple climate model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temperature overshoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temperature projection uncertainties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wetland methane contribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wetlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wetlands and global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wetlands methane feedback]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=256854</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new version of the widely used MAGICC climate model incorporates a temperature-driven wetland methane feedback, raising projected warming slightly and widening uncertainty across all scenarios.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the world&#8217;s most influential simple climate models has just been given a major upgrade, and it could change how scientists count the cost of a warming planet. MAGICC, the Model for the Assessment of Greenhouse-gas-Induced Climate Change, has long been used to translate emissions scenarios into global temperature projections, including for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). But until now, it carried a hidden simplification: after the historical period, methane emissions from natural sources such as wetlands were held constant, no matter how hot the planet became. A team led by Trevor Sloughter of Imperial College London and the University of Exeter has now built a new version, MAGICC v7.6, that lets wetlands respond dynamically to rising temperatures. Writing in the journal Geoscientific Model Development, the researchers show that this seemingly small change nudges every warming scenario upward and, perhaps more importantly, widens the uncertainty range around future temperature projections.</p>
<p>The stakes are larger than they might first appear. Wetlands cover roughly 12 million square kilometres of the Earth&#8217;s land surface, nearly 8 percent of the total, and their methane emissions account for somewhere between 20 and 30 percent of all global methane emissions, both natural and human-caused. That makes wetlands the single largest methane source in the coupled human-Earth system. Methane is a potent greenhouse gas, far more effective than carbon dioxide at trapping heat over decadal timescales, so any systematic change in wetland output ripples through the entire climate budget. Yet despite their importance, very few of the high-resolution Earth System Models (ESMs) that underpin modern climate projections explicitly model wetlands as a methane source, leaving simple climate models like MAGICC with little evidence to constrain their present and future contributions.</p>
<p>The new work draws on two rare modelling studies that did project wetland methane emissions deep into the twenty-first century. The first, by Thomas Kleinen of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology and colleagues, added a wetlands component to the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM) and ran it under five Shared Socioeconomic Pathways, from the ambitious SSP1-1.9 to the high-emissions SSP5-8.5, extending the simulations all the way to the year 3000. The second, by Zhen Zhang of the Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research and colleagues, used a wetlands model coupled to an earlier version of MAGICC under the older Representative Concentration Pathways. Strikingly, both studies found a strong linear relationship between wetland methane emissions and global average temperature, although they disagreed on how sensitive emissions are to each degree of warming.</p>
<p>That disagreement is at the heart of the new parameterisation. When the team fit a linear equation, expressing emissions as a slope times temperature anomaly plus an intercept, to the Kleinen data, the calibrated temperature sensitivity varied depending on how far into the future the fit extended: 37.5 megatonnes of methane per degree Celsius using data up to 3000, 45.8 megatonnes up to 2500, and 52.6 megatonnes up to 2300. The Zhang calibration produced a value of 35.5 megatonnes per degree. Because the linear relationship breaks down after about 2300, when stabilising temperatures cause wetland emissions in the MPI-ESM to decline, and because uncertainty grows with every additional century, the team chose to treat the higher estimates as bounding the upper end of plausible sensitivity. A recent study by Ulas Im and colleagues, published while the paper was being written, found little to no temperature sensitivity at all, suggesting the true range may span from near zero to the high end of the Kleinen fit.</p>
<p>To capture this deep uncertainty, MAGICC v7.6 draws its temperature-sensitivity parameter from a normal distribution with a median of 30 megatonnes of methane per degree and a standard deviation of 13 megatonnes. This places the Zhang estimate near the centre of the distribution while allowing a substantial fraction of model runs to reach or exceed the Kleinen values. The distribution is also consistent with an ensemble analysis of 16 process-based wetland models published by Zhang and colleagues in 2025. In practice, the model runs concentration-driven until 2015, so that historical methane remains anchored to observations, and then switches to emissions-driven mode, at which point the new wetland feedback kicks in. Each scenario simulation uses 600 probabilistic draws of parameter combinations, allowing MAGICC to propagate the spread of disagreement among Earth System Models into its own output.</p>
<p>The results are revealing. Even in comparatively cool scenarios such as SSP1-2.6, natural methane emissions in the new model climb above 200 megatonnes per year by mid-century, an increase of more than 20 megatonnes over the roughly 182 megatonnes per year that the old version held constant throughout the twenty-first century. In the warmer C3 category of mitigation scenarios, median peak natural emissions rise above 216 megatonnes, and in the 95th percentile they reach as high as 265.8 megatonnes per year. These extra emissions translate into higher atmospheric methane concentrations, which in turn feed back into the carbon cycle: methane oxidation adds carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, and warmer temperatures increase carbon dioxide respiration, producing a small but measurable rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide of a few parts per million.</p>
<p>The temperature consequences are modest but consequential. Peak and end-of-century warming increase across all scenarios by a few hundredths of a degree Celsius, and the warmer the scenario, the larger the increase. More striking is the effect on uncertainty: the spread between the 5th and 95th percentile temperature estimates widens by roughly ten percent in the new version, meaning the wetland feedback makes the hottest plausible futures even hotter relative to the coolest. This has direct implications for how scenarios are classified. Under the IPCC&#8217;s Sixth Assessment Report framework, C1 scenarios are those that limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius by 2100 with at least a 50 percent probability, C2 allows higher overshoot of 1.5 degrees, and C3 limits peak warming to 2 degrees with 67 percent probability. Running the new model, nine of 97 C1 scenarios no longer meet their end-of-century criterion, 33 of 133 C2 scenarios fail to stay below 1.5 degrees at 2100, and 82 of 311 C3 scenarios no longer keep peak warming below 2 degrees with the required probability.</p>
<p>The feedback also stretches the duration and depth of temperature overshoot, the period during which ambitious mitigation pathways temporarily exceed 1.5 degrees before drawing warming back down. In the old model, C1 scenarios overshot 1.5 degrees for an average of 28.7 years and C2 scenarios for 53.3 years. In MAGICC v7.6, those averages stretch to 38.9 and 59.9 years respectively, and the integrated overshoot, measured in degree-years, grows from 1.5 to 2.7 for C1 scenarios and from 7.0 to 9.3 for C2 scenarios. For ecosystems and communities exposed to peak temperatures, those extra years above the threshold matter, even if the annual temperature increment attributable to wetlands is only on the order of hundredths of a degree.</p>
<p>The authors are candid about the limitations of their approach. Temperature is used here as a proxy for a tangle of processes that actually drive wetland emissions, including changing precipitation patterns and the expansion of inundated tropical wetland area, and the linear relationship is known to break down over multi-century timescales, particularly under high warming where reversibility comes into question. Seasonal studies have also documented hysteresis, meaning emissions do not simply retrace their path when temperatures fall. Still, the timing of the upgrade is significant: MAGICC is being used to prepare concentration inputs for the CMIP7 generation of Earth System Model experiments, and the new version ensures that the low bias introduced by assuming constant natural methane in CMIP6 will not be repeated. As more Earth System Models publish twenty-first-century wetland methane projections, the calibration can be refined, or the simple linear relationship replaced with something more sophisticated, bringing the hidden methane feedback one step closer to being fully accounted for.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Representation of temperature-dependent natural wetland methane emissions in the MAGICC simple climate model</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Natural methane emissions feedbacks in MAGICC v. 7.6</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Natural methane emissions feedbacks in MAGICC v. 7.6. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9063-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9063-2026</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9063-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.5194/gmd-19-9063-2026</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> MAGICC, wetlands, methane, climate model, climate feedback, simple climate model, Earth System Models, IPCC, emissions scenarios, temperature overshoot, Geoscientific Model Development, CMIP7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">256854</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corporate Carbon&#8217;s Legacy Will Warm the Planet for Centuries, Simulations Show</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/corporate-carbons-legacy-will-warm-the-planet-for-centuries-simulations-show/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sloane Callahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 08:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attribution science in climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon cycle feedbacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon majors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon majors and their role in global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate attribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate modeling of future temperature rise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfactual simulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions scenarios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact of cement and fossil fuel corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FaIR model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuel emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuel emissions impact on long-term climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global temperature attribution to major carbon producers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of corporate emissions pathways on future climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legacy effects of corporate carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term consequences of fossil fuel industry activities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane lifetime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[persistent climate effects of historical emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLOS Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiative forcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simplified climate models for long-term projections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simulations of planetary warming through 2500]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=252709</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New simulations attribute centuries of future global warming to the world's largest fossil fuel and cement producers, showing their climate legacy persists and even grows relative under low-emissions pathways.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The world&#8217;s largest fossil fuel and cement producers have left a mark on the climate system that will not fade within a human lifetime, a new modeling study suggests. In research published in the journal PLOS Climate, atmospheric scientists Dargan Frierson and Lauren Henrie of the University of Washington used a simplified climate model to trace how the emissions associated with 178 of the world&#8217;s top oil, gas, coal, and cement producers—entities often collectively called the Carbon Majors—will continue to alter global temperature far into the future, potentially out to the year 2500. Their central finding is striking: the warming attributable to past corporate emissions does not simply disappear once those emissions stop. Instead, it persists, and its magnitude in future centuries depends in surprising and counterintuitive ways on which emissions pathway humanity actually follows.</p>
<p>Attribution science, the branch of climate research that assigns observed changes to specific causes, has matured rapidly over the past decade. Earlier studies established methods for attributing a share of historical warming to individual companies, building on the Carbon Majors database, a comprehensive accounting of the emissions associated with the largest fossil fuel and cement producers in the world. Those efforts focused largely on the past and the present. Frierson and Henrie extended the approach forward in time, asking not only how much warming these entities have already caused, but how their historical emissions will continue to shape the climate system across coming centuries under different assumptions about humanity&#8217;s collective future.</p>
<p>To do this, the researchers turned to the Finite Amplitude Impulse Response model, or FaIR, a widely used reduced-complexity climate model that simulates the interactions between greenhouse gas emissions, atmospheric concentrations, radiative forcing, and global temperature. FaIR captures the essential physics of the carbon cycle and the atmospheric chemistry of methane and other greenhouse agents while remaining computationally efficient enough to run many simulations. The team ran the model out to the year 2500, an unusually long horizon for attribution work, and performed counterfactual experiments: simulations in which the emissions associated with the Carbon Majors were removed from the historical record, with the difference between the factual and counterfactual worlds representing the perturbation attributable to those entities.</p>
<p>The counterfactual technique is the analytical heart of the study. By comparing a simulated world that includes the emissions of the top 178 producers with an otherwise identical world that excludes them, the researchers isolated the corporate contribution to atmospheric carbon dioxide, methane, ozone, stratospheric water vapor, and ultimately global mean temperature. They repeated this comparison across several different future emissions scenarios, ranging from futures in which global emissions fall rapidly to futures in which they continue to climb. This design allowed them to test a question that has received little attention: does the warming legacy of past emissions look different depending on what the rest of the world does next?</p>
<p>The answer, perhaps unexpectedly, is yes—and in two opposing directions. For atmospheric carbon dioxide, the anomaly attributable to a company&#8217;s historical emissions is smaller, and carries less uncertainty across the model ensemble, in a low-emissions future than in a high-emissions one. The reason lies in carbon cycle feedbacks. In a high-emissions world, warming itself weakens the ability of oceans and land ecosystems to absorb carbon, so an initial pulse of carbon dioxide produces a larger and more variable atmospheric anomaly. In a cooler, lower-emissions world, those feedbacks are muted, and the extra carbon dioxide from historical emissions is drawn down more efficiently and more predictably.</p>
<p>Yet when the researchers translated those carbon dioxide anomalies into temperature, the picture reversed. The temperature change attributable to past emissions turned out to be larger in a lower-emissions future, even though the atmospheric carbon dioxide anomaly was smaller. The explanation is the logarithmic relationship between carbon dioxide concentration and radiative forcing: each additional part per million of carbon dioxide traps less additional heat than the part per million before it. In a high-emissions future, the background concentration is already so elevated that the corporate contribution sits on the flat, less sensitive portion of the forcing curve. In a low-emissions future, where concentrations are brought down substantially, the same corporate contribution occupies a steeper portion of the curve and therefore exerts a proportionally larger influence on temperature. In other words, the more successfully the world decarbonizes, the more visible the fingerprint of historical emitters becomes in the remaining warming.</p>
<p>Methane added a further twist. The simulations showed that after roughly 2080, the methane concentration anomaly attributable to the Carbon Majors turns negative, meaning the counterfactual world without their emissions actually contains more methane than the factual one. This counterintuitive result stems from atmospheric chemistry: methane&#8217;s lifetime in the atmosphere depends on temperature, and a warmer climate shortens the chemical lifetime of methane by accelerating its removal. The historical warming caused by corporate emissions therefore acts as a small negative feedback on methane concentrations in later centuries, partially offsetting—but nowhere near fully compensating for—the positive forcing from carbon dioxide.</p>
<p>Across every scenario the researchers examined, the net effect of the Carbon Majors&#8217; historical emissions remained a warming one. The perturbations propagate through many linked components of the climate system: carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and in other reservoirs of the carbon cycle, methane, ozone, and stratospheric water vapor, the latter two arising as chemical byproducts of methane oxidation. When all of these contributions to radiative forcing are summed, the total stays positive throughout the simulations running to 2500, and positive forcing translates directly into positive temperature perturbations. There is no scenario in the study in which the corporate legacy simply cancels itself out.</p>
<p>The implications extend well beyond academic attribution. Courts, legislatures, and communities increasingly ask not just who caused climate change, but who bears responsibility for damages that have not yet occurred. This study demonstrates that such future damages are, in principle, calculable on timescales of centuries. Because the temperature perturbation attributable to each entity can be tracked through a physically consistent model under any given emissions pathway, the framework could in theory be coupled with damage functions and sea level projections to quantify ongoing liabilities. The researchers emphasize that the attributable warming is not a fixed historical quantity but a pathway-dependent one, which means that choices made in the coming decades will shape how the responsibility of past emitters is expressed in the climate of the future.</p>
<p>The study also carries a sobering message for the general public: the climate consequences of emissions already released are effectively locked in for many generations, regardless of how quickly the world now decarbonizes. Even in optimistic scenarios, the simulations show the Carbon Majors&#8217; historical emissions continuing to raise global temperatures for centuries, interacting with carbon cycle feedbacks, atmospheric chemistry, and the logarithmic physics of radiative forcing in ways that keep their influence positive and quantifiable. As Frierson and Henrie conclude, in addition to the damages that have already occurred, these entities can be expected to be responsible for calculable climate damages for many centuries to come—a legacy written into the physics of the atmosphere itself.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Attribution of centuries-long global warming to major fossil fuel and cement producers under future emissions scenarios</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Centuries of global heating from Carbon Majors: Dependence on future emissions pathways</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Centuries of global heating from Carbon Majors: Dependence on future emissions pathways. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0001036" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0001036</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0001036" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1371/journal.pclm.0001036</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> climate attribution, Carbon Majors, FaIR model, fossil fuel emissions, carbon cycle feedbacks, radiative forcing, methane lifetime, counterfactual simulations, PLOS Climate, global warming, emissions scenarios, climate damages</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">252709</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Antarctica Is Locked In to Sea-Level Rise by 2100, Machine-Learning Study Finds</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/antarctica-is-locked-in-to-sea-level-rise-by-2100-machine-learning-study-finds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Green]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 11:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctic contribution to global sea level]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctic Ice Sheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctic ice sheet melting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bayesian calibration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change adaptation strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change Impact on Antarctica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate projections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coastal risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of greenhouse gas emission scenarios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions scenarios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice shelf melt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice-sheet model uncertainties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice-sheet modelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implications of irreversible ice loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISMIP6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISMIP6 climate models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term sea-level rise predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine-learning in climate modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine ice-sheet instability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sea level rise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sea level rise projections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sea-level rise by 2100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sliding laws]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=247454</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A machine-learning analysis of ice-sheet model ensembles shows the Antarctic Ice Sheet is very likely committed to mass loss by 2100 even under the most aggressive emissions cuts, with high-emissions pathways capable of driving up to 25.4 centimetres of sea-level rise.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Antarctic Ice Sheet, Earth&#8217;s largest reservoir of freshwater and the equivalent of 57.9 metres of potential global sea-level rise, is now very likely committed to losing mass through the end of this century no matter how aggressively humanity cuts emissions, according to a new study published in Nature Geoscience. Using a machine-learning emulation framework trained on the Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project (ISMIP6), researchers led by Yucheng Lin of City University of Hong Kong and CSIRO Environment quantified, for the first time, how each individual physical assumption in ice-sheet models cascades into projection uncertainty. Their observation-calibrated results suggest a probability of at least 0.92 that the ice sheet continues losing mass by 2100 even under the most ambitious emissions-reduction scenario, SSP1-1.9, rising to at least 0.95 under the very high-emissions SSP5-8.5 pathway.</p>
<p>The central problem the team tackled is that Antarctic sea-level projections have long been dominated by a bewildering spread of outcomes. In ISMIP6, the flagship model intercomparison feeding into the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report, projections of the Antarctic contribution to sea-level rise by 2100 under SSP5-8.5 ranged from less than minus 7 centimetres to more than 40 centimetres of sea-level equivalent, with models outside the exercise suggesting an even broader range. Traditional intercomparison exercises follow a &#8216;one model, one vote&#8217; approach, which can bias ensemble results towards whichever modelling choices happen to be adopted by more research groups, regardless of their physical plausibility or consistency with observations. Until now, the contribution of each individual modelling decision to that spread had never been systematically disentangled.</p>
<p>To break the problem open, the researchers built a statistical emulator that mimics the behaviour of computationally expensive numerical ice-sheet models. They compiled a database of 340 ISMIP6-2300 simulations from 41 model submissions, spanning 29,240 samples across 86 annual time steps, and characterised each simulation with 21 features: 18 ice-dynamical modelling choices, plus the driving atmosphere-ocean general circulation model, the emissions scenario and the projection year. After testing six machine-learning algorithms with tenfold cross validation, they adopted Gradient Boosting, which sequentially builds decision trees that each correct the errors of the last. The emulator achieved a coefficient of determination of 0.98, outperforming previous long-short-term-memory and Gaussian-process emulators, and its 95 per cent credible intervals captured 95.5 per cent of true simulation values. Running at roughly 30,000 samples per second on a laptop, it allowed the team to generate ensembles of half a million projections that would have been computationally impossible with full numerical models.</p>
<p>The variance decomposition delivered a striking verdict: in raw, uncorrected simulations, ice-model features dominate twenty-first-century Antarctic uncertainty, accounting for an average of 64 per cent of projection variance. Sliding laws, the equations relating basal shear stress to sliding velocity at the ice-bed interface, alone contributed 21 per cent of the variance between 2015 and 2100. A Budd-type sliding law yielded 5.0 plus or minus 4.2 centimetres more sea-level rise by 2100 than a linear Weertman law. Ice-shelf melt parameterizations, which translate coarse ocean warming signals into spatially variable basal melt beneath floating ice, contributed another 20 per cent; an observation-calibrated linear thermal forcing function produced 7.8 plus or minus 5.2 centimetres more than the ISMIP6 standard non-local parameterization. Numerical choices mattered too: running models at 1-kilometre resolution instead of 8 kilometres reduced projected sea-level rise by 4.3 plus or minus 2.8 centimetres, because fine grids better resolve the topography controlling ice streams and grounding-line migration.</p>
<p>The picture changes when drift-corrected simulations are used, in which each model&#8217;s control-run variability is subtracted to isolate the dynamical response to climate change. Because control-run variability accounts for 45 per cent of raw-simulation variance, removing it cuts ice-model feature uncertainty to 23 per cent and elevates climate forcing to nearly half of the total, with the choice of atmosphere-ocean model contributing 31 per cent and global mean surface temperature 17 per cent. The team also quantified how the spatial geometry of Antarctic mass loss, which generates gravitational, rotational and deformational sea-level fingerprints, adds location-specific uncertainty. For London and Singapore the fingerprint effect contributes less than 1 per cent of variance, rising to 5 per cent in New York and 3 per cent in Shanghai, but near the ice sheet itself it becomes a major factor, reaching 17 per cent in Buenos Aires and 21 per cent in Melbourne.</p>
<p>Probing the relationship between warming and ice loss, the study found it to be delayed, non-stationary and strongly nonlinear. Distinguishable differences between emissions scenarios in Antarctic sea-level contribution emerge only late in the century, long after global temperature trajectories diverge, reflecting the substantial forcing needed to initiate mass loss and the lag between climate perturbation and dynamical response. By 2100, the sensitivity of Antarctic sea-level rise to warming more than an order of magnitude higher in the calibrated high-end analysis: from 0.56 plus or minus 0.01 centimetres per degree Celsius at 0 to 2 degrees of warming to 5.97 plus or minus 0.01 centimetres per degree at 2 to 4.5 degrees. The choice of climate model also exerts dominant control over whether Antarctica gains or loses mass by 2100. Notably, UKESM1-0-LL, the model producing the highest twenty-first-century warming of any tested, yields net mass gain from enhanced snowfall and modest regional ocean warming, a transient gain the authors caution is confined to this century before sustained ocean-driven dynamic losses overtake surface accumulation.</p>
<p>A key innovation was Bayesian calibration against satellite observations. Many raw ISMIP6 simulations fail to reproduce observed mass-loss trends or exhibit unrealistic model drift, partly because they are initialised to fit static rather than transient observations. The team updated their prior assumptions using the observed 2002-2021 Antarctic mass-loss rate of 0.44 plus or minus 0.04 millimetres per year of sea-level equivalent, measured by the GRACE and GRACE Follow-On gravimetry missions. Calibration reduced projection uncertainty by 30 to 42 per cent and raised median projections by 15 to 25 per cent, while the posterior probabilities shifted decisively against sliding-law formulations, such as pseudo-plastic and Budd variants, that produce unrealistically fast ice flow. Crucially, the calibrated projections raise the probability of committed mass loss under SSP1-1.9 from 0.80 to 0.92, indicating that warming-enhanced snowfall is very unlikely to compensate for ocean-driven losses.</p>
<p>For risk-averse planners responsible for long-lived infrastructure, the team also characterised a physically plausible high-end pathway consistent with satellite observations. This posterior high-end scenario, defined as the top 1 per cent of calibrated 2100 projections under SSP5-8.5, unfolds as a cascade: a highly sensitive ocean warming response coincides with a sensitive melt parameterization, converting warming into vigorous basal melt; paired with a strongly plastic sliding law that lowers basal resistance, ice discharge accelerates, particularly under higher-order stress-balance formulations; and subgrid-scale melt and ice-shelf collapse then reduce buttressing, enabling rapid grounding-line retreat and potentially triggering marine ice-sheet instability. Together these mechanisms yield a median of 15.7 centimetres of sea-level rise by 2100, with a 95th-percentile value of 25.4 centimetres, and a probability of at least 0.99 that higher emissions produce higher sea-level rise than the lowest scenario.</p>
<p>The authors emphasise that several processes remain largely unexplored within ISMIP6, including marine ice cliff instability, coupled ice-ocean-atmosphere interactions, high-resolution surface mass balance, ice damage mechanisms and subglacial hydrology, any of which could accelerate mass loss once incorporated into future experiments. Their framework, they argue, offers a template for transparent documentation of ice-model features and a route to integrating new process representations coherently. The bottom line for coastal communities is sobering but actionable: Antarctic mass loss this century is effectively locked in, higher emissions directly amplify near-term risk with a probability of at least 0.89, and managing that risk demands both rapid emissions reductions in line with the Paris Agreement and sharper constraints on the modelling choices, climate model selection, sliding laws and ice-shelf melt parameterizations, that drive the deepest uncertainties in sea-level projections.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Committed twenty-first-century mass loss of the Antarctic Ice Sheet and its contribution to sea-level rise</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Committed Antarctic Ice Sheet mass loss by the end of the twenty-first century</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Lin, Y., Zhang, X., Golledge, N. R., Kopp, R. E., Church, J. A., Jin, Y., Zhao, C., &amp; Stokes, C. R. (2026). Committed Antarctic Ice Sheet mass loss by the end of the twenty-first century. <em>Nature Geoscience</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-026-02102-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-026-02102-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-026-02102-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41561-026-02102-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Antarctic Ice Sheet, sea-level rise, ice-sheet modelling, ISMIP6, machine learning, Bayesian calibration, emissions scenarios, ice-shelf melt, sliding laws, marine ice-sheet instability, climate projections, coastal risk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">247454</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warming oceans will reshape marine body sizes in surprising and uneven ways</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/warming-oceans-will-reshape-marine-body-sizes-in-surprising-and-uneven-ways/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 12:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Marine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arctic Ocean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltic Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bivalves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[body size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cephalopods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change and marine species distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change impact on marine animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological responses to ocean temperature rise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of warming oceans on marine biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions scenarios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global ocean warming and species adaptation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implications for marine ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine body size and oxygen levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine mollusks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine research on climate change effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine species size variation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mollusk body size trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonuniform marine organism resizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocean deoxygenation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocean warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PNAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temperature-size rule in oceans]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=237916</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A global study of more than 23,000 marine mollusk species projects that climate change will reshape body sizes unevenly by 2100, with most groups shrinking but some, including Arctic cephalopods, growing larger.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For decades, one of the most repeated predictions in marine science has been deceptively simple: as the oceans warm, the animals living in them will shrink. The idea, often called the temperature-size rule, has been treated almost as an ecological law, appearing in textbooks and climate models alike. But a sweeping new analysis of more than 23,000 marine mollusk species suggests that this tidy assumption badly undersells the complexity of what is actually happening beneath the waves. The study, led by Isaac Trindade-Santos, who conducted the research as a postdoctoral researcher in the University of Louisiana at Lafayette laboratory of senior author Craig McClain and is now a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Helsinki, was published on August 31 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences under the title Nonuniform resizing of marine life under climate change.</p>
<p>The research team assembled an extraordinary evidence base to test the shrinking-ocean hypothesis. They combined more than 2.79 million species occurrence records with body-size measurements spanning five major groups of mollusks: bivalves such as clams and oysters, gastropods such as snails, cephalopods such as squid and octopuses, chitons, and the less familiar scaphopods, or tusk shells. By examining how temperature, oxygen availability and ocean productivity correlate with body size across this entire phylum, the researchers built statistical relationships that could then be projected forward in time. Those projections were run through 2100 across 10 major ocean basins under both high- and low-emissions climate scenarios, producing one of the most geographically and taxonomically detailed forecasts of body-size change ever attempted for a single animal phylum.</p>
<p>The headline finding confirms part of the conventional wisdom. Under the high-emissions scenario, mean body size is projected to decline significantly in roughly two-thirds of the group-and-region combinations the team examined, amounting to decreases in 68 percent of class-basin pairings by the end of the century. In the most extreme cases, average body length could fall by as much as 16 percent by 2100. The Baltic Sea emerged as a particular hotspot: clams there are projected to shrink by about 16.2 percent in average length. Because an animal&#8217;s mass scales with the cube of its length, that seemingly modest linear change translates into a staggering estimated 41 percent decrease in average body mass, a figure with profound implications for how much living tissue these ecosystems can support.</p>
<p>Yet the study&#8217;s most striking contribution is what it found in the other direction. Not everything gets smaller. Under high emissions, cephalopods and tusk shells in the Arctic Ocean are projected to grow significantly larger, with average length increasing by 2.9 percent and 3.3 percent respectively. In a field where uniform shrinkage has been the default expectation, the prospect of some animals expanding in the fastest-warming ocean on Earth is a genuine surprise, and one that forces a rethink of how body size responds to environmental change.</p>
<p>The explanation for these divergent trajectories lies in the interplay between geography and biology. Cephalopods carry high oxygen demands, which might seem to make them vulnerable in warming, deoxygenating waters, but they also possess highly efficient circulatory systems and fast life cycles that may allow them to maintain or even increase their size as conditions change. Heavily shell-building groups such as bivalves and gastropods appear more consistently vulnerable to shrinkage, likely reflecting the energetic costs of calcification in warmer, more acidic waters. The lesson, the authors argue, is that no single physiological rule can capture the responses of an entire phylum spread across radically different ocean environments.</p>
<p>Geography, in fact, proved to be as important as taxonomy. The same group of animals can be projected to shrink in one ocean basin while growing in another, because the ocean itself is not changing uniformly. Warming, deoxygenation and shifts in productivity each follow their own regional patterns, and body size responds to the combination of all three rather than to temperature alone. This regional patchiness means that global averages, the currency of most climate impact summaries, can obscure the true biological story unfolding in any given sea.</p>
<p>The research also demonstrates the enduring scientific value of natural history collections and open biodiversity databases. The species records and body-size measurements underpinning the analysis were accumulated over centuries of observation and assembled into openly accessible resources. Trindade-Santos helped McClain develop the Marine Organismal Body Sizes database used in the study, an effort that turned scattered measurements from museums, literature and field surveys into a machine-readable foundation for global forecasting. Without that painstaking accumulation of data, questions of this scale would simply be unanswerable.</p>
<p>The stakes of these projections extend far beyond the animals themselves. Mollusks are ecological workhorses: they filter water, cycle nutrients, create habitat for other species, store carbon in their shells and tissues, and support fisheries and food security for hundreds of millions of people. A 41 percent drop in the average body mass of Baltic clams, if it materializes, would ripple through food webs, alter nutrient processing and affect commercial harvests. Changes in cephalopod abundance and size, meanwhile, could reshape predator-prey dynamics in Arctic ecosystems that are already being transformed faster than any other ocean region.</p>
<p>Critically, the study shows that the future is not yet written. Under the low-emissions scenario, significant declines were projected in only 14 of the 50 group-and-basin combinations studied, less than half the number expected under high emissions, while the number of projected increases remained roughly the same. In other words, the emissions path humanity chooses mainly determines how many groups get smaller, not which few get larger. As Trindade-Santos put it, how much marine life shrinks is, to a large degree, still a choice being made today.</p>
<p>For McClain, a professor in the School of Biological Sciences in the Ray P. Authement College of Sciences at UL Lafayette, the takeaway is a call for intellectual humility. For years, he noted, the idea that warming oceans would simply shrink marine life has been treated almost as a rule of thumb, but the results show that this is too simple a story. Across an entire phylum and at a global scale, some of the most basic animals in the ocean are responding to climate change in strikingly different ways, and a few will actually get bigger. That complexity, he argues, matters enormously for how scientists and policymakers think about the future of ocean ecosystems, and it suggests that the coming decades will demand forecasts as varied and regionally specific as the oceans themselves.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Projected nonuniform changes in body size of marine mollusks under climate change</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Climate change won’t simply shrink marine life</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Climate change won’t simply shrink marine life. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1142598" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> climate change, marine mollusks, body size, ocean warming, bivalves, cephalopods, Baltic Sea, Arctic Ocean, ocean deoxygenation, biodiversity, PNAS, emissions scenarios</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">237916</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legacy Emissions from Carbon Majors Will Keep Warming Earth for Centuries</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/legacy-emissions-from-carbon-majors-will-keep-warming-earth-for-centuries/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sloane Callahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 21:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Athmospheric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attribution of climate disasters to corporate activities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide lifetime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon majors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon majors and their role in global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate attribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change mitigation and responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contribution of oil and cement companies to greenhouse gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions scenarios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extreme weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FaIR model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuel emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future climate risk from historic emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historical emissions and future climate projections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial-era greenhouse gas emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legacy emissions from fossil fuel companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal and moral implications of carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-lasting effects of fossil fuel emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term impact of industrial emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLOS Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Washington]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=210489</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new University of Washington study finds that past emissions from the world's 178 largest fossil fuel and cement producers will continue warming the planet and elevating the odds of extreme weather for decades to come, regardless of future emissions pathways.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When a burst pipe floods a house, assigning blame is straightforward: someone left the faucet running, and the damage can be traced directly back to that act. Climate disasters are far messier. A heat wave, a catastrophic flood or a record-breaking hurricane emerges from a tangle of natural variability and human influence, and for decades the legal and moral question of who caused what remained frustratingly opaque. That opacity is now dissolving. A new study from the University of Washington, published Sept. 23 in the journal PLOS Climate, demonstrates that past emissions from the world&#8217;s largest fossil fuel and cement producers will continue to warm the planet and raise the odds of extreme weather for decades, and in some respects for centuries, into the future. The finding transforms climate accountability from a question about what has already happened into a question about what is still to come.</p>
<p>The research focuses on the so-called carbon majors, a term used by researchers and activists to describe the 178 leading oil, gas, coal and cement companies whose products and operations have released the overwhelming majority of industrial-era greenhouse gases. Together, these entities have emitted more than a trillion tons of carbon dioxide, a staggering quantity whose atmospheric consequences do not simply vanish when the smoke clears. Carbon dioxide is a long-lived gas, and a substantial fraction of every ton released will remain aloft, trapping heat, for millennia. The study&#8217;s central insight is that this persistence creates a long tail of responsibility: the warming attributable to carbon majors is largely locked in, calculable, and relatively independent of what humanity chooses to do next.</p>
<p>To quantify that legacy, the research team turned to the Finite Amplitude Impulse Response model, commonly known as FaIR, a reduced-complexity climate model widely used to simulate how emissions translate into atmospheric concentrations, radiative forcing and global temperature change. The researchers ran simulations of the global climate all the way through the year 2500, exploring both low and higher emissions scenarios. Crucially, they ran each scenario twice: once with the historical emissions of the carbon majors included through 2024, and once with those emissions removed. The difference between the paired runs isolates the temperature signal that can be attributed specifically to the top producers, allowing the team to track how that signal evolves across a wide range of possible futures.</p>
<p>The results reveal a striking asymmetry. In a future where greenhouse gas emissions are sharply limited, the carbon majors account for a larger percentage of the total warming above preindustrial levels, because their historical emissions dominate a smaller overall budget. In higher emissions scenarios, where fossil fuel burning continues unabated and the planet becomes dramatically warmer, future emissions cause a much larger share of the total temperature change. Yet the absolute temperature contribution from the carbon majors remains roughly the same across scenarios. Dargan Frierson, a University of Washington associate professor of atmospheric and climate science and the study&#8217;s lead author, summarized the implication: the amount of warming attributable to the top emitters is calculable and relatively independent of future emissions, meaning their responsibility persists no matter which path the world takes.</p>
<p>The persistence of that warming has profound physical consequences. Even if humanity were to stop emitting greenhouse gases tomorrow, the environment would not revert to its preindustrial state. According to the study&#8217;s findings, Earth would remain approximately 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial temperatures, the threshold that international climate policy has identified as a critical guardrail. Frierson put the conclusion bluntly: we expect continued warming of the climate until fossil fuel emissions stop, and the only stable future is one with no fossil fuels burned at all. In other words, there is no gentle landing. Every additional year of production by the world&#8217;s largest emitters extends and deepens the warming that future generations will inherit.</p>
<p>Why does past emissions translate into future disasters? The answer lies in the mechanics of attribution science, the field that connects individual extreme weather events to climate change. Over the past decade, attribution researchers have developed increasingly rigorous statistical methods to determine how much more likely, or how much more intense, a given heat wave, drought or downpour has become because of human-caused warming. These findings now form the backbone of a growing list of lawsuits attempting to hold major emitters responsible for deaths and damages incurred during climate disasters. The new study extends that logic forward in time: if persistent warming raises the baseline probability of extreme events, then gases released decades ago by leading producers may also be responsible for disasters that have not yet occurred.</p>
<p>This forward-looking dimension is what makes the research legally and ethically explosive. Efforts to hold emitters accountable have traditionally hinged on allegations that companies knew about climate risks many decades ago and concealed that information from the public, sometimes employing deceptive tactics to spread disinformation, as documented in archives such as the climate deception dossiers compiled by the Union of Concerned Scientists. The new analysis adds a second, quantifiable strand to that case: the gases released by extracting and burning fossil fuels are not merely a historical wrong but an ongoing mechanism of harm, one that will keep elevating the odds of future catastrophes long after the emissions themselves took place. Responsibility, as Frierson noted, is not just now; it will continue for many, many years into the future.</p>
<p>The timing of the study could hardly be more consequential. Courts around the world are weighing claims brought by cities, states and indigenous communities against fossil fuel producers, and the scientific credibility of attribution evidence has become a decisive factor in several of those proceedings. By showing that the warming contribution of the carbon majors is stable across emissions pathways, the research gives plaintiffs a robust number that does not depend on contested assumptions about future policy. It also gives regulators and policymakers a clear warning: future fossil fuel production will exacerbate climate disasters for many decades to come, which means new legal battles over accountability should be expected for years. Frierson emphasized that this is important for current decisions about fossil fuels, since every new extraction project adds to a warming burden that cannot be easily undone.</p>
<p>Underlying the entire analysis is a sober piece of climate physics. Carbon dioxide&#8217;s atmospheric lifetime is not measured in years but in centuries to millennia, and the ocean&#8217;s enormous heat capacity means that even after concentrations stabilize, the climate system continues to adjust. Reduced-complexity models like FaIR capture these dynamics by linking emissions pulses to temperature responses with well-constrained parameters drawn from the broader body of climate science. When the model runs with and without carbon major emissions diverge by a consistent margin across 500 simulated years, that margin represents real, physical, irreducible warming, heat that has already been committed to the system by past production decisions. No plausible emissions pathway can claw it back.</p>
<p>The study, co-authored by Lauren Henrie, a former student of Environmental Science and Resource Management at the University of Washington, ultimately reframes the climate crisis as a problem of accumulated, durable responsibility. The faucet is still running, in effect, and the water already in the house will keep spreading through the floors for generations. For the top 178 producers of oil, gas, coal and cement, the message is that their past is the planet&#8217;s future: the trillion tons of carbon dioxide already released will continue trapping heat, intensifying storms, and raising the odds of disaster long after today&#8217;s headlines fade. And for everyone else, the message is equally clear: the only stable future, the only one in which the warming finally stops climbing, is one in which fossil fuels are no longer burned at all.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Attribution of long-term global warming and future extreme weather risk to historical emissions from the largest fossil fuel and cement producers</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Past emissions from top polluters will continue warming the planet for decades to come</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Past emissions from top polluters will continue warming the planet for decades to come. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1144452" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> carbon majors, climate attribution, fossil fuel emissions, PLOS Climate, University of Washington, FaIR model, extreme weather, climate litigation, carbon dioxide lifetime, global warming, emissions scenarios, climate accountability</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">210489</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
