<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>electrochemical oxidation &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/electrochemical-oxidation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 18:46:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Antibiotic Pollution Meets Its Match: Predictive Model Cracks Electrocoagulation Chemistry</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/antibiotic-pollution-meets-its-match-predictive-model-cracks-electrocoagulation-chemistry/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 18:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adsorption–reaction model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced oxidation processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aluminum electrocoagulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antibiotic removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antibiotic resistance mitigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrochemical oxidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrochemical water purification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrocoagulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrocoagulation chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact of antibiotic pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metronidazole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monte Carlo simulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical micropollutants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical wastewater treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictive modeling in water treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reactive chlorine species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[removal of nitroimidazole antibiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface water contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treatment system design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Van't Hoff thermodynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water treatment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=231430</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new unified adsorption–reaction model quantitatively decouples oxidation and adsorption in aluminum electrocoagulation, predicting metronidazole removal with high accuracy across current, concentration and temperature conditions.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Metronidazole is one of those pharmaceuticals that refuses to disappear. The nitroimidazole antibiotic, used worldwide against anaerobic bacterial and parasitic infections, routinely slips through conventional wastewater treatment plants and shows up in hospital effluents and surface waters, where it can drive the emergence of antibiotic resistance and threaten aquatic ecosystems. Now a team of Algerian researchers has delivered what may be the clearest quantitative picture yet of how an electrochemical water-treatment technique dismantles this stubborn molecule, wrapping the entire process in a single predictive model that could reshape how engineers design treatment systems for pharmaceutical-contaminated water.</p>
<p>The study, published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research by Ahlem Aicha Fakir, Nadjib Drouiche and Hakim Lounici, focuses on aluminum electrocoagulation, a process in which sacrificial aluminum electrodes dissolve under an applied current to generate aluminum hydroxide flocs in situ. These gelatinous precipitates sweep contaminants out of solution by adsorption, while parallel electrochemical reactions at the electrode surface generate oxidative species, including hydroxyl radicals and reactive chlorine species such as hypochlorous acid and hypochlorite, that can chemically degrade the antibiotic. The trouble, historically, has been that these two removal routes operate simultaneously and are devilishly hard to separate, which has left much of the electrocoagulation literature relying on empirical fits rather than genuine mechanistic understanding.</p>
<p>To break that impasse, the researchers built what they call a unified adsorption–reaction model, a dynamic framework that tracks four interconnected reservoirs over time: metronidazole dissolved in the aqueous phase, metronidazole adsorbed onto the flocs, the concentration of active chlorine species, and the accumulating mass of aluminum hydroxide. Rather than treating adsorption and oxidation as competing black boxes, the model couples them explicitly, with rate constants for oxidation, adsorption, desorption and surface reaction all estimated simultaneously. The team calibrated the model against sixty concentration–time observations spanning four current intensities and fifteen sampling times, in batch experiments covering initial antibiotic concentrations from 5 to 50 milligrams per liter and temperatures from 15 to 40 degrees Celsius.</p>
<p>The results are striking. The unified model achieved a coefficient of determination of 0.996 with a root mean square error of just 3.2 percent, and it decisively outperformed the classical alternatives. Using the corrected Akaike Information Criterion, a statistical measure that penalizes model complexity while rewarding predictive accuracy, the adsorption–reaction framework beat the Langmuir–Hinshelwood model by 34.5 points, the pseudo-second-order model by 51.3 points and the pseudo-first-order model by 58.3 points. In model-selection terms, those margins are not marginal; they represent overwhelming evidence that the coupled mechanism, not a simple empirical decay curve, is the right description of what happens inside the reactor.</p>
<p>Crucially, the model did not merely fit the data it was trained on. In independent hold-out validation across the current, concentration and temperature domains, the combined root mean square error was 3.7 percent, essentially matching the calibration performance. That kind of transferability is the holy grail of process engineering, because it means the model can be trusted to predict behavior under operating conditions it has never seen, which is precisely what is needed when scaling a laboratory reactor up to a real treatment train.</p>
<p>To dissect the underlying chemistry, the team ran probe experiments with tert-butanol, a scavenger that selectively quenches hydroxyl radicals, and combined this with a dissolved organic carbon mass balance. The analysis suggested an apparent oxidative contribution of about 42 percent to metronidazole elimination, split between 35 percent complete mineralization and 7 percent partial oxidation, with the remaining 58 percent attributed to adsorptive capture. But the authors are refreshingly candid about the limits of that interpretation: because tert-butanol does not efficiently quench reactive chlorine species, those percentages should be read as operationally estimated apparent contributions that bundle together hydroxyl-radical-mediated and chlorine-mediated pathways rather than as cleanly separated mechanistic channels. It is a nuance that matters for anyone hoping to fine-tune the process chemistry.</p>
<p>The thermodynamic side of the study is equally rigorous, and it addresses a well-known pitfall in the adsorption literature. Instead of the frequently misused linear Van&#8217;t Hoff approach, the researchers applied an electrochemical Van&#8217;t Hoff formalism with nonlinear regression, yielding a standard adsorption enthalpy of minus 28.5 kilojoules per mole, consistent with a spontaneous, exothermic adsorption process. They also extracted a current-dependent enthalpy coefficient of 1.85 kilojoules per ampere per mole, though they caution that this parameter is best regarded as an empirical fitting quantity whose molecular interpretation remains phenomenological until direct surface characterization can confirm what it physically represents. That kind of restraint is rare and welcome in a field where thermodynamic parameters are sometimes over-interpreted.</p>
<p>On the practical engineering front, the study maps out an energy and cost landscape that plant designers will recognize immediately. The electrical energy per order of removal, a standard figure of merit for water treatment, came to 17.4 kilowatt-hours per cubic meter per order at 1.50 amperes, achieving 86 percent removal at the lowest total operating cost of 2.7 euros per cubic meter. Pushing the current to 1.98 amperes lifted removal above 90 percent at a modest energy penalty of 19.2 kilowatt-hours per cubic meter per order. The lowest energy per order, 13.5 kilowatt-hours, appeared at the highest tested current of 2.30 amperes, but that condition demanded the greatest total energy input and generated the most sludge, illustrating the classic trade-off between efficiency metrics, throughput and waste production. Operating costs across the tested range spanned 2.7 to 3.5 euros per cubic meter.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most forward-looking element is the uncertainty analysis. Through Monte Carlo simulation, the team estimated a 94 percent probability of achieving better than 85 percent removal even under realistic operational uncertainties, a robustness figure that speaks directly to regulators and utilities weighing whether the technology can be trusted outside pristine laboratory conditions. Sensitivity analysis identified the adsorption rate constant as the dominant control parameter, with a sensitivity index of 0.89, meaning that anything operators can do to enhance floc adsorption kinetics, from pH management to electrode configuration, will pay the largest dividends in overall performance.</p>
<p>The authors are honest about the boundaries of their work: mineralization was only partial, transformation products were not characterized, and validation was confined to synthetic solutions in a single laboratory reactor. Real wastewater, with its competing organics and variable salinity, will pose sterner tests. Even so, the framework represents a meaningful shift in how electrocoagulation can be practiced, moving the technology from trial-and-error optimization toward genuine predictive process engineering. As concerns over pharmaceutical micropollutants and antibiotic resistance intensify worldwide, tools that let engineers forecast removal performance, energy demand and cost before a single electrode is installed could prove indispensable in the effort to build sustainable treatment systems for antibiotic-contaminated waters.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Mechanistic modeling of metronidazole removal from water by aluminum electrocoagulation</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Mechanistic adsorption–reaction modeling and thermodynamic analysis of metronidazole removal by aluminum electrocoagulation: a unified framework for predictive process engineering</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Mechanistic adsorption–reaction modeling and thermodynamic analysis of metronidazole removal by aluminum electrocoagulation: a unified framework for predictive process engineering. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38251-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38251-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38251-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11356-026-38251-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> electrocoagulation, metronidazole, antibiotic removal, water treatment, adsorption–reaction model, electrochemical oxidation, reactive chlorine species, Van&#x27;t Hoff thermodynamics, energy efficiency, pharmaceutical micropollutants, process engineering, Monte Carlo simulation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">231430</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Low-Carbon Water Cleanup Zaps Pollutants With Electrified Adsorbent Regeneration</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/low-carbon-water-cleanup-zaps-pollutants-with-electrified-adsorbent-regeneration/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 14:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adsorbent regeneration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced water treatment technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[closed-loop adsorption systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drinking water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrified adsorbent regeneration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electrocatalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrocatalytic pollutant destruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrochemical oxidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emerging contaminants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emerging contaminants removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentally friendly water cleanup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low footprint pollutant capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-carbon technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low-carbon water treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature Communications.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature-inspired water purification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phase transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regenerative water treatment methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selective adsorption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selective adsorption for water pollutants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable water purification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water treatment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=205871</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have coupled selective adsorption with electrocatalytic, phase-transferred regeneration to remove and destroy emerging water contaminants in a low-carbon closed loop.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Water utilities around the world are facing an uncomfortable truth: some of the most worrying pollutants in drinking water are also the hardest to remove. So-called emerging contaminants, a sprawling category that includes per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, pharmaceutical residues, endocrine-disrupting chemicals, pesticides and industrial solvents, slip through conventional treatment trains designed for pathogens, sediments and organic matter. Activated carbon can capture many of them, but the spent carbon must then be incinerated or shipped to landfill, transferring the problem rather than solving it. A new study published in Nature Communications describes a treatment concept that aims to break this cycle by pairing highly selective adsorption with an electrocatalytic regeneration step that destroys or phase-transfers the captured pollutants in place, with a carbon footprint that the authors argue is dramatically lower than incumbent approaches.</p>
<p>The central insight of the work is that the two halves of the treatment cycle, capture and release, should be designed together rather than sequentially. Most adsorption systems treat the sorbent as a disposable sponge: it accumulates contaminants until it saturates, and then it is replaced. The researchers instead engineered a closed-loop material in which the adsorption step is selective enough to concentrate trace contaminants from large volumes of water, and the regeneration step is energetic enough to destroy those contaminants or drive them into a separate, easily managed phase. The result is a process in which the sorbent is not a consumable but a durable, rechargeable component of the treatment infrastructure.</p>
<p>Selectivity is the first pillar of the design. Emerging contaminants typically exist at concentrations of nanograms to micrograms per liter, dwarfed by orders of magnitude by natural organic matter, carbonate, sulfate and chloride that compete for adsorption sites. The team addressed this by tailoring the surface chemistry of the adsorbent so that it presents binding motifs matched to the electronic and structural features of target pollutants, such as fluorinated tails, aromatic rings or ionizable amine and carboxyl groups. This molecular recognition strategy, borrowed in spirit from affinity chromatography, allows the material to preferentially pull dilute targets out of a noisy background matrix, extending its working lifetime far beyond that of non-selective carbons, which foul quickly in real waters.</p>
<p>The second pillar is the regeneration chemistry. Rather than washing the sorbent with solvents or heating it in a furnace, the researchers immerse the loaded adsorbent in an electrochemical cell where a controlled potential drives electrocatalytic reactions at the material interface. At the cathode, reduction reactions can defluorinate stubborn carbon-fluorine bonds or reductively dehalogenate chlorinated compounds; at the anode, oxidation can mineralize pharmaceutical fragments to carbon dioxide, water and inorganic ions. Crucially, the design also exploits phase transfer: contaminants desorbed during regeneration are shuttled into a distinct liquid or gas phase, physically separating the pollutant load from the treatment water so that it can be captured, concentrated and accounted for rather than redissolved into the effluent.</p>
<p>This phase-transferred regeneration is what distinguishes the approach from earlier electrochemical regeneration attempts, which often simply desorb contaminants back into a small volume of rinse water that still requires disposal. By coupling desorption to an interfacial reaction that moves the pollutant into a different phase, the system converts a waste-handling liability into a separable stream. The authors report that the adsorbent retains the majority of its capacity over repeated adsorption-regeneration cycles, an essential requirement if the material is to function as long-lived infrastructure rather than a single-use product that quietly accumulates a hidden manufacturing footprint.</p>
<p>The sustainability argument rests on a lifecycle comparison. Incineration of spent granular activated carbon is energy-intensive and, for fluorinated compounds, raises concerns about the formation of volatile fluorinated degradation products in stack emissions. High-temperature regeneration furnaces similarly demand continuous fossil energy input. In contrast, electrocatalytic regeneration can be powered directly by renewable electricity, operates near ambient temperature and pressure, and avoids the transport emissions associated with hauling spent media off site. When the authors tally the energy and material flows across the full treatment cycle, including sorbent manufacture and repeated regeneration, the low-carbon case for the coupled process becomes clear, particularly in grids where the electricity mix is decarbonizing rapidly.</p>
<p>The electrochemical engineering details matter as much as the chemistry. The researchers describe how the applied potential window must be tuned carefully: too mild, and desorbed contaminants simply accumulate at the interface or re-adsorb; too aggressive, and the electrode material corrodes, or the background matrix of chloride and natural organic matter consumes charge in unproductive side reactions that generate chlorinated byproducts. By controlling current density, electrolyte composition and electrode architecture, the team demonstrates conditions under which target contaminants are degraded efficiently while energy consumption per unit of pollutant removed remains competitive. Modular electrode stacks, they suggest, could be retrofitted to existing adsorber vessels, allowing utilities to upgrade rather than rebuild their plants.</p>
<p>Like any laboratory advance, the technology faces real-world tests before it can be considered proven at scale. Real drinking water sources vary enormously in pH, hardness, dissolved organic carbon and ionic strength, and each of these variables can shift adsorption affinity, regeneration efficiency and electrode stability. Long-duration cycling experiments, fouling studies with genuine surface waters and brines, and pilot-scale trials treating actual contaminated groundwater will be needed to confirm that the selectivity and capacity measured in the laboratory survive contact with the messy chemistry of the field. The economics, too, will hinge on the cost and durability of the engineered sorbent and on whether the phase-transferred pollutant stream can be disposed of or valorized cheaply enough to close the business case.</p>
<p>Even so, the study sketches a compelling vision for the next generation of water treatment: adsorbents that behave like rechargeable batteries for pollution, soaking up dilute threats and then being electrically reset, with the captured contaminants destroyed or concentrated rather than displaced elsewhere. As regulators tighten limits on PFAS and pharmaceuticals, and as utilities confront the carbon cost of energy-hungry advanced oxidation and activated carbon regeneration, processes that couple selective capture to renewable-powered electrocatalytic destruction could reshape how the industry thinks about the full lifecycle of its treatment media. The work suggests that the path to cleaner water need not run through hotter furnaces or longer landfill hauls, but through smarter interfaces where electrons do the work that energy and waste streams once did.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Selective adsorption coupled with phase-transferred electrocatalytic regeneration for sustainable, low-carbon removal of emerging contaminants from water.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Sustainable and low-carbon removal of emerging contaminants by selective adsorption and phase-transferred electrocatalytic regeneration</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Sustainable and low-carbon removal of emerging contaminants by selective adsorption and phase-transferred electrocatalytic regeneration. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-77385-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-77385-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-77385-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41467-026-77385-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> emerging contaminants, water treatment, selective adsorption, electrocatalysis, PFAS, adsorbent regeneration, low-carbon technology, phase transfer, electrochemical oxidation, drinking water, sustainability, Nature Communications</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">205871</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
