<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ecotoxicological assessment &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/ecotoxicological-assessment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 11:46:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Advanced oxidation process reduces micropollutant toxicity in wastewater for agricultural reuse</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/advanced-oxidation-process-reduces-micropollutant-toxicity-in-wastewater-for-agricultural-reuse/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 11:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced oxidation process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced oxidation technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biological compatibility of treated sewage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical and biological safety of wastewater reuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical and biological water safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecotoxicological assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecotoxicological assessment of treated effluent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact of micropollutants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental sustainability in water management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid AOP treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid AOPs in water treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micropollutant removal in wastewater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micropollutant toxicity reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical contaminants in sewage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical contaminants removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant and microorganism safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reactive free radicals in pollutant degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable wastewater management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transformation products toxicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater reuse in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater treatment for agricultural reuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater treatment innovation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/advanced-oxidation-process-reduces-micropollutant-toxicity-in-wastewater-for-agricultural-reuse/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers in Brazil have demonstrated that a hybrid advanced oxidation process can transform pharmaceutical-laden wastewater into an effluent that is dramatically safer for plants, earthworms, onion root cells, and beneficial microorganisms, offering a rigorous ecotoxicological case for reusing treated sewage in agriculture. The study, published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, addresses a long-standing blind [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Researchers in Brazil have demonstrated that a hybrid advanced oxidation process can transform pharmaceutical-laden wastewater into an effluent that is dramatically safer for plants, earthworms, onion root cells, and beneficial microorganisms, offering a rigorous ecotoxicological case for reusing treated sewage in agriculture. The study, published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, addresses a long-standing blind spot in water treatment: proving that a chemically &#8220;clean&#8221; effluent is also biologically compatible.</p>
<p>Conventional wastewater treatment plants were never designed to strip out recalcitrant organic micropollutants such as pharmaceuticals, and trace amounts routinely slip through into receiving waters. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) attack these stubborn compounds by generating highly reactive free radicals that fragment contaminant molecules. But chemical degradation alone does not guarantee safety. As contaminants break down, they spawn transformation products (TPs) that can, in some cases, be as toxic as—or more toxic than—the parent compounds. The research team, led by Lucas Gustavo da Costa and Alam Gustavo Trovó of the Federal University of Uberlândia, together with collaborators at the Oswaldo Cruz Institute, set out to answer a deceptively simple question: does measurable chemical removal of micropollutants actually translate into reduced biological harm?</p>
<p>The centerpiece of their work is the H₂O₂/S₂O₈²⁻/UVC process, a hybrid system that combines hydrogen peroxide and persulfate with short-wave ultraviolet C radiation. UVC photons cleave both oxidants simultaneously, generating hydroxyl radicals (HO•) and sulfate radicals (SO₄•⁻) in the same reaction volume. This dual-radical strategy outperforms systems relying on either oxidant alone, or on peroxymonosulfate (HSO₅⁻), which is costlier and demands more energy for activation. The hybrid route also resists interference from inorganic species commonly found in real effluents, making it an economically attractive candidate for deployment at full-scale treatment plants. The process had already been chemically optimized in the team&#8217;s earlier work using multivariate mixture design and rotatable central composite design experiments; the new study is its first integrated biological stress test.</p>
<p>The experiments used real municipal effluent from a wastewater treatment plant in Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, sampled after the plant&#8217;s final tertiary treatment stage of coagulation-flocculation with ferric chloride and flotation. The effluent was enriched with three pharmaceuticals representing different therapeutic classes: colchicine (COL, an antimitotic agent), nitazoxanide (NTZ, an antiparasitic), and sulfamethoxazole (SMX, a widely detected antibiotic), each at 325 nmol L⁻¹—equivalent to 130, 100, and 82 micrograms per liter, respectively. That concentration was deliberately chosen as high enough for direct HPLC–DAD analysis without preconcentration, yet low enough to be environmentally representative. Treatment was carried out in an amber glass reactor irradiated by two 8-watt UVC mercury lamps emitting at 254 nm, with a measured irradiance of 4.9 W m⁻². Residual oxidants were neutralized with sodium thiosulfate before any biological testing, ensuring that observed effects could not be attributed to leftover peroxide chemistry.</p>
<p>The ecotoxicological battery spanned multiple trophic levels and levels of biological organization. Oxidative stress was assessed in the earthworm Eisenia andrei by measuring malondialdehyde (MDA), a marker of lipid peroxidation, and protein carbonylation, an irreversible oxidative modification of proteins. Phytotoxicity was evaluated using lettuce (Lactuca sativa) seeds and a growth index combining germination rate and root elongation. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity were quantified in onion (Allium cepa) root meristems through the mitotic index and the frequency of chromosomal and nuclear aberrations—micronuclei, chromosome breaks, stickiness, bridges, and nuclear buds—across 5,000 cells per sample. Finally, growth inhibition was tested in two environmentally relevant microbes: Azospirillum brasilense, a plant growth-promoting bacterium used in soybean cultivation, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a yeast that persists in soils and fermentative niches.</p>
<p>The untreated enriched effluent told a worrying story. It exhibited substantial genotoxicity in onion cells—21%, approaching the 24% seen with the positive control, methyl methanesulfonate—and severe phytotoxicity, with lettuce growth indices far below the 80% threshold that signals absence of toxicity. Even the unspiked effluent itself suppressed lettuce growth, achieving a growth index of only 47%, evidence that bioactive compounds survive conventional treatment. In earthworms, individual aqueous solutions of NTZ and SMX raised MDA levels by 37.2% and 23.5% respectively, while the three-compound mixture increased lipid peroxidation by 38.0%, pointing to additive or synergistic oxidative stress mechanisms involving reactive oxygen species and Fenton-type chemistry within cells.</p>
<p>The picture changed decisively after oxidation. Following 10 minutes of UVC-driven treatment—the point at which 80% chemical degradation had been achieved, matching the minimum removal target proposed in the European Union&#8217;s COM(2022)541 directive—genotoxicity fell to 10%, and after 20 minutes, corresponding to the limit of quantification for the parent compounds, it dropped further to 6%, a statistically significant reduction. The plant growth index climbed above 80%, crossing from toxic territory into biocompatibility. The mitotic index in onion cells remained statistically indistinguishable from the deionized-water control (around 39–40% versus 40%), demonstrating that the process generated no cytotoxic byproducts capable of arresting cell division. And crucially for agricultural applications, neither the treated effluent nor its transformation products inhibited growth of A. brasilense or S. cerevisiae.</p>
<p>The mechanistic details are instructive. In the untreated enriched effluent, micronuclei—membrane-bound DNA fragments expelled from the nucleus during flawed cell division—were among the most frequent aberrations, indicating clastogenic and aneugenic damage. Colchicine exposure predictably produced C-metaphase accumulation, a signature of its tubulin-binding, spindle-disrupting mechanism first described in Allium nearly a century ago. SMX depressed the mitotic index and induced chromosomal damage, consistent with prior findings in Vicia faba. NTZ, whose genotoxicity had never before been reported, produced chromosome breaks, stickiness, and nuclear buds. After oxidation, the overall aberration burden fell sharply, particularly micronuclei and stickiness, although a few bridges and polyploid cells persisted even at 20 minutes—a reminder that some transformation products or resistant residuals may linger.</p>
<p>The microbial results came with a subtlety. Reduced A. brasilense growth after treatment initially looked like a red flag, but the team attributes it to depletion of assimilable organic matter, which serves as radical scavenger during oxidation and as a nutrient source afterward—not to toxicity. The negative control likewise grew slowly. This distinction matters because AOPs are designed to mineralize organic carbon, and a nutrient-poorer medium should not be misread as a more toxic one. For S. cerevisiae, no inhibition occurred at any stage of treatment, although NTZ alone significantly depressed yeast optical density, reinforcing the compound&#8217;s cell-cycle interference potential even at nanomolar-scale exposures.</p>
<p>The study&#8217;s broader significance lies in its methodological stance. By adopting an &#8220;effect-driven approach,&#8221; the team evaluated the toxicity of whole reaction mixtures without needing to isolate and identify individual transformation products—an impractical task given that many degradation byproducts are not commercially available. Their findings align with a growing consensus that treatment efficacy must be judged not merely by parent-compound removal but by the nature and reactivity of the resulting transformation products. Biochemical biomarkers such as MDA and protein carbonylation detected sublethal disturbances that mortality-based endpoints would have missed entirely, providing early warnings of cellular distress at environmentally relevant concentrations.</p>
<p>One caveat deserves attention: while lipid peroxidation declined after treatment, protein carbonylation rose slightly—1.05-fold above control—suggesting some transformation products may still provoke protein oxidation even as lipid damage subsides. The authors flag this discrepancy and call for future identification of the specific TPs responsible, alongside expanded organism panels, longer-term exposure studies, and pilot-scale validation across different environmental matrices.</p>
<p>The regulatory context sharpens the urgency. The EU&#8217;s proposed urban wastewater treatment directive mandates at least 80% removal of specified organic micropollutants and microbiological control for agricultural reuse, yet it conspicuously omits eco-compatibility assessment of the treated water itself. This study supplies exactly that missing dimension, showing that a process satisfying the chemical benchmark also delivers measurable biological benefit—lower genotoxicity, restored plant growth, intact cell division, and unharmed beneficial microbes. As water scarcity intensifies globally and reuse becomes less optional, the Brazilian team&#8217;s integrated bioassay framework offers a template for ensuring that the water farmers irrigate with is not merely chemically compliant, but genuinely ecologically safe.</p>
<div class="scienmag-article-metadata"><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Mitigation of micropollutant toxicity in treated wastewater using the H₂O₂/S₂O₈²⁻/UVC advanced oxidation process, assessed through integrated ecotoxicological bioassays for potential agricultural reuse.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Mitigation of micropollutant toxicity in treated wastewater using the H2O2/S2O82−/UVC process: An ecotoxicological perspective for agricultural reuse</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> da Costa, L. G., dos Santos, G. M., Marson, E. O., de Lima, M. G. F., de Souza Bessa, M. A., Scarafiz, G., Junior, S. F. S., Saggioro, E. M., de Carvalho, S. R., de Siqueira Ferreira, A., Nilin, J., Neto, W. B., &amp; Trovó, A. G. (2026). Mitigation of micropollutant toxicity in treated wastewater using the H2O2/S2O82−/UVC process: An ecotoxicological perspective for agricultural reuse. <em>Environmental Science and Pollution Research</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38218-5" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38218-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38218-5" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11356-026-38218-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Advanced oxidation process, Micropollutants, Wastewater reuse, Ecotoxicity, Genotoxicity, Phytotoxicity, Oxidative stress, Hydroxyl radicals, Sulfate radicals, UVC treatment, Agricultural irrigation, Transformation products</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">191469</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deltamethrin insecticide harms aquatic caddisfly larvae, a pyrethroid pollution bioindicator</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/deltamethrin-insecticide-harms-aquatic-caddisfly-larvae-a-pyrethroid-pollution-bioindicator/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gavin Prescott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 23:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aquatic insect toxicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bioindicators of water quality degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caddisfly larvae as bioindicators of water quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caddisfly larvae sensitivity to insecticides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cellular effects of pyrethroids on aquatic insects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellular-level damage in caddisflies caused by pyrethroids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deltamethrin environmental impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deltamethrin insecticide toxicity to aquatic caddisfly larvae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecotoxicological assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecotoxicological assessment of deltamethrin in freshwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of pyrethroid insecticides on aquatic insect midgut and fat body]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact of agricultural runoff on stream ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental safety thresholds for pyrethroids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freshwater invertebrate ecotoxicology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freshwater invertebrate sensitivity to insecticide exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impact of agricultural runoff on freshwater invertebrates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insecticide harm to aquatic ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midgut and fat body damage in caddisflies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pyrethroid pollution bioindicators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pyrethroid pollution impact on freshwater invertebrates]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/deltamethrin-insecticide-harms-aquatic-caddisfly-larvae-a-pyrethroid-pollution-bioindicator/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a laboratory in southeastern Brazil, caddisfly larvae abandoned their protective silk-and-detritus cases, slowed their movements, and suffered severe damage to their guts after exposure to deltamethrin at concentrations far below levels routinely measured in the environment. A new study, published in the journal Ecotoxicology, provides the first detailed description of the midgut and fat [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a laboratory in southeastern Brazil, caddisfly larvae abandoned their protective silk-and-detritus cases, slowed their movements, and suffered severe damage to their guts after exposure to deltamethrin at concentrations far below levels routinely measured in the environment. A new study, published in the journal Ecotoxicology, provides the first detailed description of the midgut and fat body of the aquatic insect Grumichella boraceia and demonstrates that this little-known species may be among the most sensitive freshwater invertebrates yet tested against one of the world&#8217;s most widely used pyrethroid insecticides.</p>
<p>The research, conducted by Álvaro Domingues Ataide and colleagues at the Federal University of Viçosa, focused on a species of long-horned caddisfly described only in 2016. Trichoptera larvae, familiar to stream ecologists as the architects of portable cases, capture nets, and retreats built from silk and debris, occupy a central place in freshwater food webs. Because they respond measurably to environmental degradation, caddisflies are already widely used as bioindicators of water quality. What the new study adds is a cellular-level account of exactly how a commercial pyrethroid formulation attacks a sensitive non-target species, together with a toxicity benchmark that raises uncomfortable questions about the safety margins currently assumed for agricultural runoff.</p>
<p>The commercial product tested was Decis 25EC, a deltamethrin-based insecticide manufactured by Bayer CropScience. Deltamethrin belongs to the pyrethroid class, synthetic compounds derived from the insecticidal principle of chrysanthemum flowers. Pyrethroids act primarily on voltage-gated sodium channels in neurons, keeping them open and producing hyperexcitation, paralysis, and death. They also inhibit glutathione S-transferase, a key detoxifying enzyme in insects. Although the nerve and muscle are the classic targets, the new results show that the gut suffers profound structural damage as well, even when the dose is too low to kill most individuals quickly.</p>
<p>The team&#8217;s laboratory bioassay followed standard protocols from the US Environmental Protection Agency and the OECD. Larvae collected from a stream at Fazenda Remanso in Araponga, Minas Gerais, between January and October 2024, were acclimated and reared in glass aquariums fitted with gentle filters and natural stony substrate, at temperatures of 20 to 23 degrees Celsius. Groups of ten larvae, each between one and two centimeters long, were then exposed to four concentrations of the insecticide in dechlorinated water, with four replicates per treatment and a total of 200 individuals. Mortality was recorded every 24 hours for up to 72 hours, and lethal concentrations were estimated with a Probit model.</p>
<p>The results were striking. The 24-hour LC50, the concentration that kills half the exposed animals, came out at just 0.0037 micrograms of active ingredient per liter. That figure is 16.2 times lower than the field-relevant residual level of 0.06 micrograms per liter previously reported in a river of the same basin. In other words, concentrations already documented in the wild would be more than enough to kill a substantial fraction of the larvae within a day. At the pilot concentration of 0.06 micrograms per liter, mortality was a hundred percent.</p>
<p>The comparison with other aquatic arthropods sharpens the picture further. The mayfly Callibaetis radiatus, considered sensitive to pyrethroids, shows a 24-hour LC50 of 0.60 micrograms per liter for deltamethrin, more than 160 times higher than that of G. boraceia. The phantom midge Chaoborus obscuripes, a standard reference species for pyrethroid sensitivity, requires 0.027 to 0.075 micrograms per liter of lambda-cyhalothrin over longer exposure windows. Against these benchmarks, the Brazilian caddisfly stands out as exceptionally vulnerable, and the authors argue that this sensitivity makes it a strong candidate for inclusion in ecological risk assessments and freshwater biomonitoring programs.</p>
<p>Beyond lethality, the bioassay documented a disturbing behavioral signature. Larvae exposed to all four insecticide dilutions abandoned their cases within 24 hours, whereas control animals stayed inside their shelters and aggregated normally. Treated larvae showed reduced motility and a blunted response to mechanical stimulation. Case abandonment has been reported before, notably in the caddisfly Brachycentrus americanus exposed to the pyrethroid esfenvalerate, and it is usually interpreted as an escape response to contamination. The irony is grim: leaving the case increases exposure to predation, so even larvae that survive the chemical may pay an ecological price afterward. Similar reductions in movement and responsiveness have been described in lepidopteran larvae, including the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda, treated with pyrethroids.</p>
<p>To understand the cellular basis of these effects, the team turned to histology. Surviving larvae exposed for 24 hours to the LC50 concentration were fixed in glutaraldehyde, embedded in historesin, sectioned at three micrometers, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin, with additional histochemical tests for total proteins using mercury-bromophenol blue and for neutral polysaccharides using the periodic acid-Schiff reaction. Every treated larva examined showed midgut damage compared with controls.</p>
<p>The normal midgut of G. boraceia proved to be an elegant structure. Its wall consists of a simple columnar epithelium wrapped in circular and longitudinal muscle layers, with a peritrophic matrix lining the lumen. The epithelium is dominated by columnar digestive cells bearing a well-developed apical brush border and a central ovoid nucleus packed with decondensed chromatin, the signature of active protein synthesis. Less numerous are goblet-like cells, identified by an apical invagination forming a cavity lined with its own brush border, and clusters of small regenerative cells nestle at the base of the epithelium, ready to replace worn cells. Histochemistry confirmed abundant proteins throughout the epithelium and carbohydrate-rich vesicles in the apical cytoplasm and brush border.</p>
<p>After deltamethrin exposure, this architecture fell apart. All five treated larvae displayed epithelial disorganization, with apical protrusions bulging from the digestive cells, some of them released as fragments into the gut lumen, and intense cytoplasmic vacuolization, some of the vacuoles corresponding to spherocrystals that failed to stain for protein. The pattern echoes damage reported in caterpillars exposed to deltamethrin and other insecticides, and in the mayfly C. radiatus treated with the same compound. The researchers interpret the increased apocrine secretion observed in treated larvae as a possible detoxification response, since similar secretions in other insects have been linked to enzymes involved in xenobiotic metabolism. Spherocrystals, meanwhile, have previously been associated with detoxification and osmoregulation in wasps and honey bees exposed to contaminants.</p>
<p>One organ remained untouched. The fat body of G. boraceia, organized into a peripheral parietal region and a visceral region hugging the midgut, is composed of trophocytes with irregular nuclei, basophilic cytoplasm, and lipid droplets. After exposure to the LC50 concentration, neither the structure of the fat body nor its protein and carbohydrate content differed from controls. The authors suggest that the fat body may have successfully detoxified the sublethal dose, a capacity documented in mosquito larvae exposed to ivermectin and in honey bees treated with imidacloprid. The contrasting picture, a wrecked midgut beside a pristine fat body, offers a rare anatomical snapshot of where a pyrethroid&#8217;s sublethal damage concentrates in an aquatic larva.</p>
<p>The study also carries an evolutionary footnote. Goblet cells in the insect midgut were long thought to be unique to caterpillars, where they pump potassium and support nutrient absorption and detoxification. Finding goblet-like cells in G. boraceia aligns with the only previous Trichoptera histological study, of Limnephilus stigma in 1980, and supports the view that goblet cells are a shared derived trait of the Amphiesmenoptera clade, which unites butterflies and moths with caddisflies as sister orders. The detailed anatomy reported here, the first for any species of the genus Grumichella, doubles as a contribution to comparative insect morphology in a group whose internal biology remains almost unstudied.</p>
<p>The practical message is sobering. Decis 25EC is toxic to G. boraceia at concentrations below those already measured in natural waters of the region, and it damages the gut and behavior of survivors. Because commercial formulations contain adjuvants that are themselves sometimes harmful to non-target insects, the results also underline the importance of testing products as they are actually applied, not just the purified active ingredient. For rivers draining agricultural land across the tropics, a recently described caddisfly may now serve as an early-warning sentinel, its abandoned cases and ravaged midguts signaling contamination long before fish or other vertebrates show effects.</p>
<div class="scienmag-article-metadata"><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Morphological and toxicological effects of a deltamethrin-based insecticide (Decis 25EC) on the midgut and fat body of aquatic caddisfly larvae Grumichella boraceia (Trichoptera: Leptoceridae) as a bioindicator of pyrethroid contamination</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Morphological and toxicological effects of a deltamethrin-based insecticide on aquatic insect larvae: Grumichella boraceia (Trichoptera) as a bioindicator of pyrethroid contamination</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Ataide, Á. D., da Silva, L. L., Santos Pereira, G. D., Salgado, F. S., da Costa, D. A., &amp; Serrão, J. E. (2026). Morphological and toxicological effects of a deltamethrin-based insecticide on aquatic insect larvae: Grumichella boraceia (Trichoptera) as a bioindicator of pyrethroid contamination. <em>Ecotoxicology, 35</em>(6), Article 135. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-026-03121-9" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-026-03121-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-026-03121-9" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10646-026-03121-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> caddisfly, Grumichella boraceia, deltamethrin, Decis 25EC, pyrethroid, ecotoxicology, bioindicator, midgut histopathology, fat body, aquatic insects, freshwater contamination, LC50</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">188315</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
