<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ecosystem functioning &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/ecosystem-functioning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:58:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Mud-Dwelling Seafloor Animals Quietly Steer Carbon Storage in the North Sea</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/mud-dwelling-seafloor-animals-quietly-steer-carbon-storage-in-the-north-sea/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benthic macrofauna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benthic macrofauna and carbon cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity roles in carbon burial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioirrigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioturbation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecosystem functioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functional traits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global carbon cycle and seabed reservoirs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helgoland marine research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine ecosystem biodiversity and climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mud depocenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mud depocenter sediment dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Sea carbon storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic carbon sequestration in seabed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seafloor mud-dwelling animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sediment biogeochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sediment biogeochemistry in marine environments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sedimentary processes in North Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shelf sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tidal currents impact on marine sediment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=264871</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A large-scale survey of the southeastern North Sea's muddy seafloor shows that environmental gradients shape benthic communities in ways that split carbon cycling between deep, bioturbation-dominated zones and shallow, respiration-dominated ones.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beneath the gray, churning waters of the southeastern North Sea lies a stretch of fine-grained mud that scientists increasingly view as one of the shelf&#8217;s most important carbon vaults. A new study published in the journal Biogeosciences reveals that the animals burrowing through this sediment are not passive residents but active managers of the carbon cycle, and that their influence shifts dramatically with depth, salinity, and the force of tidal currents. Drawing on 171 macrofaunal taxa collected from 50 stations across a muddy depocenter off the island of Helgoland, a team led by Chueh-Chen Tung of the Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research has produced one of the most detailed portraits yet of how seafloor biodiversity governs the processes that determine whether organic carbon is buried or released back to the atmosphere.</p>
<p>The study area, a region of fine-grained sediment known as a mud depocenter, sits in water depths of roughly 7 to 51 meters and has recently been identified as a hotspot for carbon burial, with burial efficiency reported to be about twice the global average. Such depocenters form where hydrodynamic conditions trap and retain fine particles delivered by rivers, allowing organic matter to accumulate rapidly. While the geochemistry of these deposits has attracted considerable attention, the biological side of the equation has remained poorly resolved. The new research addresses that gap by asking how the composition, traits, and diversity of bottom-dwelling invertebrates vary across the depocenter and how those variations translate into ecosystem functions tied to carbon cycling.</p>
<p>Sampling was carried out in July 2023 aboard the research vessel Heincke, using a van Veen grab at each of the 50 stations. The team identified 31,086 individual animals spanning 9 phyla and 89 families, ranging from brittle stars and heart urchins to bivalves and bristle worms. Biomass across the stations varied more than twentyfold, from less than 0.4 grams to more than 10 grams of ash-free dry mass per square tenth of a meter. When the researchers clustered the communities by their biomass composition, four distinct assemblages emerged, arranged in a striking east-west pattern: two clusters dominated the deeper western reaches of the study area, while the other two occupied the shallower eastern zone, with all four overlapping in a transitional band between 20 and 30 meters of water depth.</p>
<p>Statistical modeling revealed that this spatial structure was not random. A distance-based redundancy analysis showed that environmental variables explained 44.1 percent of the variation in community composition, with sediment sorting, skewness, kurtosis, median grain size, bottom salinity, and bottom shear stress all emerging as significant predictors. The deeper communities were associated with higher salinity and calmer bottom waters, whereas the shallower communities endured stronger tidal shear stress and fresher, more variable conditions. In effect, the seafloor fauna of the depocenter is sorted along two intersecting gradients: one physical, driven by the friction of currents on the bed, and one chemical, driven by the mixing of saline North Sea water with freshwater runoff from the coast.</p>
<p>The functional contrast between deep and shallow assemblages proved even more telling than the taxonomic one. In the deeper clusters, biomass was dominated by mobile biodiffusors and subsurface filter feeders, most notably the brittle star Amphiura filiformis, which alone accounted for nearly 59 percent of total macrofaunal biomass in those communities on average. Laboratory studies cited by the authors show that this species can mix sediments at rates of roughly 35 square centimeters per year, actively transporting particles both downward to its mouth and upward to the surface. In the shallower clusters, by contrast, the fauna was dominated by less mobile, surface-modifying bivalves such as Abra species and tube-dwelling polychaetes, organisms that redistribute particles only at the sediment surface and ventilate their burrows infrequently.</p>
<p>These trait differences translated directly into divergent ecosystem functions. The team calculated four functions for each community: bioturbation potential, bioirrigation potential, secondary production, and respiration. Bioturbation and bioirrigation, the processes by which animals rework sediment particles and pump oxygenated water into their burrows, were roughly two to two and a half times higher in the deep clusters than in the shallow ones, with mean bioturbation potential of 284.0 versus 151.2 and mean bioirrigation potential of 223.2 versus 86.6. Both differences were highly significant statistically. The pattern reversed for energy-related functions: community respiration averaged 505.9 milligrams of carbon per square meter per day in the shallow clusters against 347.6 in the deep ones, a significant difference, while secondary production showed the same trend at 135.9 versus 107.5 milligrams of carbon per square meter per day.</p>
<p>The biodiversity-functioning relationships that emerged were, in places, counterintuitive. Secondary production and respiration both increased with taxonomic and functional richness, with correlation coefficients around 0.54, consistent with the idea that a greater variety of species brings a greater variety of trait combinations and enhances niche complementarity. But bioturbation and bioirrigation potentials were negatively correlated with Shannon diversity, Simpson diversity, and community evenness, with the strongest negative correlation, r equal to minus 0.55, linking evenness to bioturbation. The explanation, the authors argue, lies in a selection effect: sediment reworking in this system is disproportionately driven by a few highly efficient key species, above all Amphiura filiformis, rather than by the collective action of a diverse community. Where one dominant bioturbator reigns, evenness falls and reworking potential soars.</p>
<p>Crucially, the study shows that these biodiversity-functioning relationships are not fixed but bend along environmental gradients. Interaction regressions and simple slope analyses revealed that bottom shear stress and salinity significantly modulated the sign and strength of the correlations. In the deeper, high-salinity, low-shear habitats, the negative relationships between bioturbation or bioirrigation and diversity were pronounced; in the shallower, high-shear, low-salinity zone, they weakened or even turned slightly positive, though not significantly. The relationship between functional redundancy and energy-related functions was likewise modulated by shear stress, salinity, and sediment kurtosis, a measure of the peakedness of the grain-size distribution that the authors suggest may serve as a proxy for habitat stability. In stable, high-kurtosis sediments, functionally redundant communities appeared to prioritize persistence over peak performance, hinting at a trade-off between resilience and functioning efficiency.</p>
<p>The implications extend beyond the German Bight. Because bioturbation and bioirrigation control the delivery of oxygen and electron acceptors such as nitrate into deeper sediment layers, they regulate the microbial processes that determine whether organic matter is remineralized to carbon dioxide or preserved in the deposit. The finding that deeper communities combine high biomass with intense reworking suggests that carbon and nutrient cycling in the heart of the depocenter is strongly biologically driven, whereas in the shallower, physically disturbed margins, carbon dynamics are governed more by hydrodynamic forces than by fauna. As the authors note, a direct measurement linking macrofaunal communities to carbon sequestration is still missing, and closing that gap will be essential for predicting how these systems respond to change.</p>
<p>What the study delivers, meanwhile, is a clear warning wrapped in an opportunity. Biodiversity loss in shelf seas may not simply erode ecosystem functions uniformly; it may rewire them, suppressing some pathways while leaving others intact, depending on which species disappear and where. Preserving functional diversity, and in particular the keystone bioturbators that dominate the deep muds, appears essential for sustaining the benthic machinery that allows coastal depocenters to act as carbon reservoirs. As climate policy increasingly looks to natural carbon sinks, this work makes the case that the humble invertebrates of the seafloor, from brittle stars to burrowing clams, deserve a seat at the table alongside forests and wetlands in the accounting of the planet&#8217;s carbon budget.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Benthic macrofaunal biodiversity and its role in carbon cycling ecosystem functions in a North Sea mud depocenter</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Linking marine benthic biodiversity and ecosystem functions related to carbon cycling in a continental mud depocenter</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Tung, C.-C., Holtappels, M., Wrede, A., Köster, M., Sander, L., Beermann, J., Sidorenko, V., &amp; Gutow, L. (2026). Linking marine benthic biodiversity and ecosystem functions related to carbon cycling in a continental mud depocenter. <em>Biogeosciences, 23</em>(19), 7129-7150. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-7129-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-7129-2026</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-7129-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.5194/bg-23-7129-2026</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> benthic macrofauna, biodiversity, carbon cycling, bioturbation, bioirrigation, North Sea, mud depocenter, ecosystem functioning, sediment biogeochemistry, functional traits, carbon sequestration, shelf sea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">264871</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global synthesis of 423 studies reveals biodiversity&#8217;s uneven grip on nature&#8217;s services</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/global-synthesis-of-423-studies-reveals-biodiversitys-uneven-grip-on-natures-services/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Porter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 21:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity and climate change resilience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity ecosystem services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity's role in pollination and food security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comprehensive global biodiversity studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecosystem functioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecosystem services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of land-use change on ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functional redundancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global biodiversity data synthesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global synthesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human pressures on biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of exotic species on native ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPBES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine and freshwater ecosystem health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pest regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy implications for biodiversity conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shared Socioeconomic Pathways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[threats to biodiversity and ecosystem services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uneven impact of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=249905</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A landmark synthesis of 423 studies and over 200,000 data points shows that biodiversity strengthens most ecosystem functions and services worldwide, with oceanic carbon sequestration exceptionally sensitive and pest regulation forecast to decline fastest in fast-growing, low-development countries.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most comprehensive synthesis of its kind ever assembled has delivered a verdict that will reshape how scientists and policymakers think about the living world: biodiversity underpins the functioning of ecosystems and the services they provide to humanity, but it does so with startling unevenness. An international team led by researchers at Imperial College London and King&#8217;s College London compiled 423 studies containing more than 222,000 individual data points, drawn from terrestrial, freshwater, marine and estuarine systems across every inhabited continent. Published in Nature Ecology &amp; Evolution, the analysis is more than twice the size of the next largest database in the field, and it moves the debate beyond the simple question of whether biodiversity matters to the far more consequential questions of where, how and under what circumstances it matters most.</p>
<p>The scale of the undertaking reflects the urgency of the problem it addresses. Human pressures such as land-use change and the spread of exotic species are estimated to have pushed around one million species towards extinction, threatening the pollination, carbon storage, water purification and food production systems on which societies depend. Global frameworks, including the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, aim to halt these declines, but effective action demands a quantitative understanding of exactly how diversity translates into ecological performance. The new study follows the classification scheme of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, distinguishing ecosystem functions, the processes occurring within ecosystems, from ecosystem services, the contributions those processes make to human well-being, while treating carbon sequestration separately across land and sea because of its central role in climate regulation.</p>
<p>One of the study&#8217;s central findings concerns the shape of the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem performance. Ecologists have long debated whether adding species yields steadily increasing benefits, a linear relationship implying that every species, including rare ones, contributes meaningfully, or whether benefits plateau quickly, a saturating relationship suggesting widespread functional redundancy. Across 23 categories of functions and services, the team found that quadratic models best described 11 categories and linear models 9, with only two best fit by logarithmic curves. In other words, linear and saturating forms are almost equally common, and for many services the benefits of diversity continue to climb across the biodiversity gradients observed in the empirical literature. The authors argue that saturation limits have rarely been reached in the studies compiled, implying that functional redundancy may be systematically overestimated and that individual species contribute more uniquely than commonly assumed.</p>
<p>Where saturation does occur, the thresholds differ dramatically between realms. In freshwater systems, service delivery typically saturates at a median of roughly four species, with a median absolute deviation of two, whereas terrestrial systems require around 14 species and marine systems around 23. The researchers attribute this gradient to fundamental differences in ecological architecture: freshwater food webs tend to be dominated by generalists operating at relatively small scales, while marine systems, exemplified by coral reefs, combine vast spatial extent, high trophic complexity and pervasive mutualisms and co-evolutionary interactions that demand a larger species pool to sustain function. Marine ecosystems may also display low species multifunctionality, meaning individual services can be supported by a small subset of species, but maintaining the full portfolio of services requires high overall diversity.</p>
<p>To compare effect strengths across these different functional forms, the team calculated standardized effect sizes, using Fisher&#8217;s Z-transformed correlation coefficients for each of 1,959 datasets. The results were emphatic: higher biodiversity enhanced most functions and services, from carbon capture to food production, but the magnitude varied enormously. Regulation of air quality showed an effect size of essentially zero, while oceanic carbon sequestration registered a value of 1.48, by far the strongest response of any category examined. This exceptional sensitivity of oceanic blue carbon, a significant component of the global carbon cycle, suggests that marine carbon cycling, including phytoplankton productivity, microbial loop dynamics and the biological carbon pump, is under tight biological control linked to community composition and trophic structure. The authors caution, however, that oceanic sequestration is represented by only seven datasets in the database, compared with 154 for terrestrial sequestration, a critical knowledge gap that itself constitutes a call to action.</p>
<p>Not every service behaves the same way. Hazard regulation, the capacity of ecosystems to buffer floods, storms and erosion, showed weak overall sensitivity to biodiversity despite often displaying linear relationships in the functional-form analysis. The explanation lies in functional uniqueness: some services are delivered overwhelmingly by a few foundational species or ecosystem engineers. Sand dunes, for instance, are stabilized by one or two key shrub species that create a natural barrier against flooding and erosion, and adding further species does not necessarily improve that protective performance. Yet the wider community still matters, because the persistence of these foundational taxa depends on the ecological conditions that a diverse community maintains. The study connects this pattern to the concept of ecosystem-specific planetary boundaries, thresholds beyond which ecosystem functions can collapse, and proposes developing a typology of species and system traits to help conservationists identify in advance which systems are governed by uniqueness and which by redundancy.</p>
<p>Context proved decisive throughout the analysis. Using linear mixed-effects models, the team found that biodiversity effects generally strengthened with increasing spatial grain, consistent with beta-diversity effects in which spatial turnover in species composition enhances functional complementarity across sites. But the pattern reversed for specific services: contributions to hazard regulation, net primary productivity and biomass turnover all declined significantly at coarser scales, echoing forest studies where positive relationships at fine grains turn negative at broader ones. Ecosystem type also mattered, with biodiversity effects positive on average in freshwater systems, negative in marine systems and non-significant in terrestrial ones, though these averages concealed strong variation among service categories. Observational studies revealed modestly but statistically stronger effects than experiments, suggesting that small-scale, simplified experimental plots may underestimate the cumulative, context-dependent impacts of biodiversity loss that play out across real landscapes.</p>
<p>The synthesis then ventures beyond description into forecasting. Because the underlying literature is heavily biased towards developed countries, underrepresenting regions critical for global food production such as South America and Africa, the team built a heuristic modelling framework linking their biodiversity-ecosystem service relationships with projected biodiversity intactness under the IPCC&#8217;s Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Applied to agricultural pest regulation, measured as the ratio of natural enemies to pests, a widely used proxy for top-down biological control, the model projects that pest regulation declines more severely under the fossil-fuel-driven SSP5 scenario than under the middle-of-the-road SSP2, with reductions forecast across North America, South America and Asia. Crucially, the declines are disproportionately concentrated in countries experiencing rapid population growth and low Human Development Index values, precisely the nations most reliant on local ecosystem services and least equipped to substitute pesticides or imports for lost natural pest control.</p>
<p>The implications reach well beyond agriculture. By quantifying where biodiversity loss will bite hardest, the framework gives planners a scientifically grounded basis for anticipating problems before they materialize, and the team has released model outputs and forecasts for all 23 service and function categories across five socioeconomic scenarios. The authors are candid about limitations: the projections assume that species loss is random with respect to functional importance, whereas if vulnerable species are also functionally critical, future service declines could be steeper than predicted. Progress, they argue, will require hybrid networks embedding experimental manipulations within long-term monitoring, hierarchical sampling to separate local, regional and landscape diversity contributions, and a new generation of field experiments designed explicitly to disentangle redundancy from uniqueness. What the synthesis establishes beyond reasonable doubt is that biodiversity is not a luxury of pristine wilderness but the operating infrastructure of a functioning planet, and that the richest communities, those closest to saturation thresholds never yet observed, are the ones humanity can least afford to lose.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Global relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and services</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Biodiversity safeguards ecosystem services and functions worldwide</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Moffett, E. R., Gayford, J. H., Chen, L., Morris, O. F., Shi, Y., Somekh, L., Stasik, N., Purvis, A., Woodward, G., &amp; Pearse, W. D. (2026). Biodiversity safeguards ecosystem services and functions worldwide. <em>Nature Ecology &amp;amp; Evolution</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-026-03200-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-026-03200-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-026-03200-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41559-026-03200-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> biodiversity, ecosystem services, ecosystem functioning, carbon sequestration, blue carbon, pollination, pest regulation, IPBES, shared socioeconomic pathways, functional redundancy, marine ecosystems, global synthesis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">249905</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heavy Grazing Unravels the Hidden Microbial Networks Beneath Desert Grasslands</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/heavy-grazing-unravels-the-hidden-microbial-networks-beneath-desert-grasslands/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan Morrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 08:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[16S rRNA sequencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-occurrence networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desert grassland microbial diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desert grasslands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecosystem functioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of overgrazing on soil organic matter decomposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grazing intensity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of grazing intensity on soil fungi and bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of grazing on microbial-mediated nutrient cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inner Mongolia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactions between microbes and vegetation types in desert grasslands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITS sequencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial community structure in arid ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial network disruption in desert ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial resilience to grazing pressure in Inner Mongolia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of bacteria and fungi in desert soil stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shrub encroachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil health and microbial diversity in pastoral landscapes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbial networks under overgrazing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbiome]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=237312</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study of Inner Mongolian desert grasslands shows that heavy grazing erodes soil microbial diversity and produces complex but unstable bacterial networks, while shrub cover partially buffers the damage.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beneath the windswept desert grasslands of Inner Mongolia, an invisible economy hums along regardless of what happens above ground. Bacteria and fungi trade nutrients, decompose organic matter, and anchor the thin soils that hold this fragile ecosystem together. A new study published in Plant and Soil now shows that the relentless pressure of overgrazing does not merely thin the vegetation and compact the soil; it quietly dismantles the diversity and the intricate web of relationships among the microbes that make these arid lands function at all. The findings carry an uncomfortable warning for one of the world&#8217;s largest pastoral landscapes.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Shaokun Wang and Salman Zare of the Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, working from the Urat Desert-grassland Research Station, set out to answer a deceptively simple question: how do different grazing intensities reshape the soil microbial communities of desert grasslands, and does the dominant vegetation type, shrubs versus grasses, change that answer? To find out, they sampled soils across six treatment combinations, pairing three grazing regimes, non-grazing, light grazing, and heavy grazing, with two vegetation types, shrub-dominated and grass-dominated plots, in the Inner Mongolian desert steppe.</p>
<p>The methodological backbone of the study was high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene for bacteria and the internal transcribed spacer region for fungi, the standard molecular barcodes that allow ecologists to inventory entire microbial communities from a pinch of soil. Rather than stopping at a simple species list, the researchers also constructed co-occurrence networks, statistical maps in which microbial taxa are nodes and significant correlations between their abundances are edges. These networks offer a window into the potential ecological interactions, cooperation, competition, and shared habitat preferences, that structure life below ground, and their architecture is increasingly used as a proxy for ecosystem stability.</p>
<p>What the sequencing revealed first was a familiar cast of characters. The bacterial communities were dominated by the phyla Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Chloroflexi, a lineup typical of arid-land soils where rapid-growing copiotrophs and slow, resilient oligotrophs jostle for scarce carbon. On the fungal side, a single phylum, Ascomycota, overwhelmingly dominated, reflecting the capacity of many ascomycete lineages to tolerate drought, exploit plant litter, and persist in harsh, resource-poor conditions. But the real story emerged not from who was present, but from how many were present and how they were connected.</p>
<p>Across the board, heavy grazing eroded microbial diversity. Plots that had never been grazed supported the highest richness, the highest Shannon diversity, and the greatest phylogenetic diversity of soil microbes, meaning they harbored not just more species but a broader evolutionary spread of lineages. Light grazing occupied an intermediate position, while heavy grazing consistently produced the poorest communities. This pattern matters because diversity is widely treated as insurance: communities rich in species and evolutionary history are expected to buffer ecosystems against disturbance, maintain nutrient cycling under stress, and recover more readily after shocks. Stripping away that insurance in already marginal desert soils is a gamble with thin margins.</p>
<p>The network analysis delivered the study&#8217;s most striking and counterintuitive result. The most complex bacterial network appeared not in the untouched plots but under heavy grazing in the grass-dominated sites, where the network boasted 62,255 edges, a density of 0.0530, and a complexity index of 43.65. At first glance, that might sound like good news, as if heavy grazing somehow stimulated a richer web of microbial interactions. But the researchers found that this apparent complexity came bundled with reduced stability indicators. In other words, the network had become tangled and densely connected in a way that signals fragility rather than robustness, a crowded switchboard in which the failure of a few key nodes could cascade through the whole system.</p>
<p>This distinction between complexity and stability is the conceptual heart of the paper. Ecologists have long debated whether bigger, denser ecological networks are inherently more stable, and the evidence from Inner Mongolia argues emphatically that they are not. A network can be large and interconnected yet brittle, particularly when that structure arises as a stress response rather than as the product of a mature, well-buffered community. Under heavy grazing pressure, the loss of plant cover, the trampling and compaction of soil, and the depletion of carbon and nitrogen inputs appear to force microbes into a reorganized, densely correlated state, one that may reflect shared stress responses or disrupted niche partitioning rather than healthy mutualism. Complexity, the authors conclude, is not synonymous with stability.</p>
<p>Vegetation type turned out to be a critical modifier of these grazing effects. Shrub-dominated plots partially mitigated the damage that heavy grazing inflicted on the microbial communities. Shrubs, with their deeper roots, woody litter, and ability to trap windblown organic material, create fertile islands beneath their canopies that can sustain microbial populations even when livestock pressure is intense. Grass-dominated communities, by contrast, offered less protection, and it was precisely in the heavily grazed grass sites that the most complex yet least stable bacterial networks appeared. For land managers, this suggests that the composition of the plant community is not a backdrop to soil health but an active participant in it, capable of either cushioning or amplifying the impacts of grazing.</p>
<p>The statistical analyses reinforced how tightly the underground world is coupled to what happens above it. Mantel tests, which measure the correspondence between two distance matrices, revealed strong positive associations between microbial community composition and plant diversity, plant biomass, soil carbon, and soil nitrogen, with Mantel&#8217;s r exceeding 0.4 and p-values below 0.001. Pearson correlations painted a consistent picture at the level of individual variables. The message is that microbes are not passive residents of these soils; their diversity and their interaction networks track the plant community and the soil&#8217;s chemical fertility almost in lockstep. When grazing degrades plants and depletes carbon and nitrogen, the microbial world degrades with them, and the ecosystem services those microbes provide, decomposition, nutrient mineralization, soil aggregation, are likely to follow.</p>
<p>The practical implications stretch well beyond Inner Mongolia. Desert grasslands cover vast swaths of Central Asia and similar arid regions worldwide, and they support pastoral livelihoods that have persisted for millennia. Yet they are also among the ecosystems most vulnerable to degradation, and the soil microbes that underpin their functioning recover slowly, if at all, once lost. The study&#8217;s authors argue that their findings underscore the necessity of sustainable grazing management to preserve soil microbial resilience and ecosystem functioning. Concretely, that means keeping stocking rates within the carrying capacity of the land, rotating livestock to allow recovery periods, and paying particular attention to shrub-dominated patches, which appear to act as refugia for below-ground biodiversity. The invisible economy beneath the steppe, the new research makes clear, can only absorb so much before its tangled connections begin to fray, and once they do, the productivity and stability of the entire grassland hang in the balance.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effects of grazing intensity on soil microbial diversity and co-occurrence networks in Inner Mongolian desert grasslands</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Responses of soil microbial diversity and network complexity to the grazing intensities in grass and shrub dominated desert-grasslands of Inner Mongolia</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Wang, S., Zhao, S., Zhao, X., Liu, L., Zare, S., Qu, H., Ma, X., &amp; Yue, P. (2026). Responses of soil microbial diversity and network complexity to the grazing intensities in grass and shrub dominated desert-grasslands of Inner Mongolia. <em>Plant and Soil</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09069-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09069-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09069-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11104-026-09069-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> soil microbiome, grazing intensity, desert grasslands, Inner Mongolia, co-occurrence networks, microbial diversity, 16S rRNA sequencing, ITS sequencing, network stability, shrub encroachment, soil carbon, ecosystem functioning</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">237312</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Billions of Marine Worms Move Mountains of Estuary Mud, Study Finds</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/billions-of-marine-worms-move-mountains-of-estuary-mud-study-finds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gavin Prescott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 00:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bahia Brazil estuary study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bayesian modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benthic invertebrate ecosystem functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioturbation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological scaling of invertebrate activities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecosystem functioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estuarine ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estuarine organic matter consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functional redundancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term benthic monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macrofauna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine worm ecological impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic material processing in estuaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic matter decomposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polychaete sediment reworking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polychaetes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of marine worms in sediment turnover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salinity gradient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sediment displacement by worms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sediment dynamics in estuarine environments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sediment reworking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tropical estuary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tropical estuary biodiversity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=211498</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study estimates that polychaete worms in a tropical Brazilian estuary consume over 232 tons of organic matter and rework more than 6,000 cubic meters of sediment every four days, revealing how laboratory experiments and long-term monitoring can be combined to quantify ecosystem-level functions.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beneath the mudflats of a tropical Brazilian estuary, an army of unassuming marine worms is quietly performing labor on a staggering scale. A new study estimates that polychaetes—bristled segmented worms that most beachgoers never notice—consume roughly 232.6 tons of organic material and rework more than 6,000 cubic meters of sediment every 96 hours across a 23.7 square kilometer stretch of the Jaguaripe River estuary in Bahia, Brazil. That sediment volume, the researchers note, is equivalent to about two and a half Olympic swimming pools, or roughly 407 dump truckloads, moved by worms in just four days. The work, published in the journal Discover Ecology, represents one of the first attempts to scale up the ecological functions of estuarine invertebrates from laboratory bench measurements to an entire ecosystem.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Amanda Martins of the Federal University of Bahia together with Marcos Krull and Francisco Barros, combined two rarely united sources of evidence: a long-term benthic monitoring dataset stretching back to 2004, and controlled laboratory experiments that measured exactly how much organic matter individual worms eat and how much sediment they displace. The monitoring data came from ten sampling stations along the estuary&#8217;s salinity gradient, surveyed on six separate occasions between 2004 and 2022. At each station, researchers collected cores of sediment, sieved the samples through a 0.5 millimeter mesh, and identified the invertebrates to the family level. Polychaetes made up more than half of all benthic macroinvertebrates in the system, making them the natural focal group for the study.</p>
<p>To translate counts of worms into estimates of ecosystem-wide function, the team turned to Bayesian generalized linear mixed models, a statistical framework that allows researchers to predict abundance across unsampled areas while quantifying uncertainty. The models incorporated environmental predictors including salinity and sediment grain size fractions—ranging from coarse sand upstream to fine sand and mud downstream—drawn from high-resolution environmental layers covering the modeled estuarine portion of the system. The researchers tested both Poisson and negative binomial distributions, with and without zero-inflation parameters, and compared generalized additive and generalized linear mixed models. Model selection relied on leave-one-out cross-validation using Pareto-smoothed importance sampling, and the winning models were fitted with Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods using a Hamiltonian sampler, with four independent chains and weakly informative priors to regularize the estimates.</p>
<p>The result of this statistical machinery was a population estimate of roughly 2,062.5 million individual polychaetes across the estuarine system, with a 95 percent credible interval spanning about 1.87 to 2.63 billion individuals. Seven families dominated the analysis: Orbiniidae, Spionidae, Eunicidae, Pilargidae, Lumbrineridae, Onuphidae, and Goniadidae. Orbiniidae alone accounted for an estimated 1,045.9 million individuals, followed by Onuphidae with 671.6 million. Densities were highest in the marine-influenced regions of the estuary, particularly for these two dominant families, setting the stage for a strongly spatially patterned delivery of ecological functions.</p>
<p>The functional measurements themselves came from a previous experimental study in which worms collected from the Jaguaripe estuary were kept under controlled laboratory conditions. Organic matter decomposition was quantified as the consumption rate of standardized pieces of shrimp tissue over 96 hours, corrected for natural decomposition using controls. Bioturbation—the reworking of sediment—was measured as the volume of sediment displaced by each species, reconstructed from computed tomography scans of the burrow systems the worms produced. This CT-based approach allowed the researchers to visualize and measure the three-dimensional architecture of worm burrows without disturbing them, providing an unusually precise metric of a notoriously difficult-to-quantify process.</p>
<p>When the per-individual rates were multiplied by the model-predicted abundances across the estuary, the numbers were striking. Polychaetes consumed an estimated 232.56 tons of organic material over 96 hours, with Orbiniidae responsible for 123.16 tons—about 53 percent of the total—and Onuphidae contributing another 89.81 tons, or nearly 39 percent. Bioturbation totaled an estimated 6,098.3 cubic meters of sediment over the same period, again dominated by Orbiniidae at 4,495.1 cubic meters and Onuphidae at 1,070.7 cubic meters, together accounting for more than 91 percent of the total. Smaller families such as Eunicidae, Spionidae, and Lumbrineridae contributed comparatively little to bioturbation, while Eunicidae and Pilargidae were minor players in organic matter consumption as well.</p>
<p>The spatial patterns were equally revealing. Both functions peaked in regions of elevated salinity, in the euhaline and polyhaline zones near the estuary&#8217;s mouth. Orbiniidae and Onuphidae delivered their largest contributions at salinities between 25 and 40, whereas Spionidae showed a strikingly different profile, contributing up to 80 percent of decomposition and bioturbation in the lower-salinity upstream reaches, between roughly 5 and 20 on the salinity scale. Sediment grain size also mattered: the dominant families responded to different granulometric fractions, with Orbiniidae and Onuphidae key in coarse sand and mud regions respectively, and Spionidae playing its characteristic upstream role in very fine sand. No single sediment variable was consistently selected across all taxa, underscoring that each family responds to its own combination of environmental conditions.</p>
<p>Correlation analyses of the functional contributions revealed another important pattern: functional redundancy. In the marine lower estuary, the contributions of Orbiniidae, Onuphidae, and Lumbrineridae rose and fell together, with correlation coefficients for bioturbation reaching 0.93 between Orbiniidae and Onuphidae and 0.92 between Lumbrineridae and Onuphidae. This overlap means that if one family were lost, others performing similar roles could partially compensate, buffering the ecosystem against disturbance. In the oligohaline upstream zones, by contrast, fewer families contributed to the functions, and redundancy was correspondingly lower—making those reaches potentially more vulnerable to species loss. Spionidae, with low correlations to all other taxa, stands out as functionally irreplaceable in the upstream areas where it dominates.</p>
<p>The study&#8217;s authors are candid about its limitations. Only seven families and two functions were analyzed, other taxa in the estuary may contribute substantially, and variables such as food resources beyond the measured organic matter could not be included. The decomposition measurements represent early-stage, macrofauna-mediated breakdown driven by direct consumption at the sediment surface, not the full complexity of benthic metabolism. Body size, which likely influences per-individual function, could not be incorporated because weight data were unavailable for several taxa. Still, the researchers argue, the demonstration that laboratory experiments can be combined with long-term monitoring and Bayesian modeling to produce ecosystem-level estimates is itself a methodological advance, offering a template for other systems where functional data remain scarce—particularly in the tropics, where most species-specific functional measurements to date have been conducted in temperate terrestrial environments.</p>
<p>The broader implications extend to conservation and climate adaptation. Estuaries are hotspots of organic matter input and nutrient cycling, disproportionately productive relative to their area, yet they face mounting pressures from eutrophication, metal pollution, shrimp farming, and sea-level rise. Because polychaete bioturbation aerates deeper sediment layers, reduces compaction, and accelerates organic matter processing, the loss of these worms could tip sediments toward anoxia, with cascading effects on entire benthic communities. The functional maps generated by the study highlight regions of high activity that could guide conservation priorities, and the identification of low-redundancy upstream zones flags areas where monitoring should be intensified. As climate change reshapes salinity gradients and species distributions, the authors suggest that modeling the distribution and functioning of organisms under future scenarios will be essential for predicting trends—and for protecting the billions of small engineers whose invisible labor keeps coastal ecosystems running.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Ecosystem-level estimation of polychaete-mediated organic matter decomposition and bioturbation in a tropical estuary</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Scaling up polychaete contributions to estuarine ecosystem functions</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Martins, A., Krull, M., &amp; Barros, F. (2026). Scaling up polychaete contributions to estuarine ecosystem functions. <em>Discover Ecology, 2</em>(1), Article 6. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44396-026-00023-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44396-026-00023-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44396-026-00023-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44396-026-00023-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> polychaetes, estuarine ecology, bioturbation, organic matter decomposition, ecosystem functioning, Bayesian modeling, functional redundancy, salinity gradient, macrofauna, tropical estuary, sediment reworking, conservation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">211498</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sacred Forests of Eastern India Prove to Be Powerful Engines of Nutrient Cycling</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/sacred-forests-of-eastern-india-prove-to-be-powerful-engines-of-nutrient-cycling/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chloe Pearson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 21:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biocultural conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity preservation through cultural practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community-led biodiversity conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decomposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological significance of sacred groves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecosystem functioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in situ conservation of biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaf litter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaf litter decomposition rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litterbags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litterfall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient cycling in tropical forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient flux in sacred woodlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient recycling efficiency in protected forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Odisha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious protection of forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sacred forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacred forests of Odisha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sal-dominated forest ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seasonal effects on forest floor processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shorea robusta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil fertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tropical dry deciduous forest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tropical savanna climate impact on forests]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=203216</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A year-long study of four sacred forests in Western Odisha, India, reveals exceptionally high litterfall and rapid decomposition that make these culturally protected groves powerful engines of nutrient cycling.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deep in the western districts of Odisha, India, small patches of forest have been protected for generations not by fences or legislation, but by faith. These sacred forests, guarded by local communities through religious beliefs and cultural traditions, are among the oldest forms of in situ biodiversity conservation on the subcontinent. A new year-long study has now revealed that these culturally protected woodlands are not merely spiritual refuges; they are also remarkably efficient nutrient-recycling machines, churning through leaf litter at speeds that rival or exceed those of better-studied tropical forests.</p>
<p>Researchers from Sambalpur University, Terracon Ecotech, and the Government of Odisha set out to quantify litterfall production, standing litter biomass, decomposition rates, and nutrient fluxes in four sacred forests across the region: Andhari, Dedungri, Medha, and Papanga. Three of the sites are dominated by sal (Shorea robusta), while Papanga is dominated by Cleistanthus collinus. The forests lie within a tropical savanna climate zone, where annual rainfall ranges from 900 to 1,400 millimeters, almost all of it delivered during the June-to-September monsoon, and where pre-monsoon temperatures can exceed 45 degrees Celsius. That pronounced seasonality shapes nearly everything that happens on the forest floor.</p>
<p>Between January and December 2023, the team measured litter inputs monthly using one-square-meter collection pits established at least ten meters inside each forest boundary to avoid edge effects. The collected material was separated into leaves, twigs, branches, and miscellaneous fragments, then oven-dried and weighed. Annual litterfall ranged from 8.59 megagrams per hectare per year at Andhari to 11.32 megagrams per hectare per year at Medha, figures that sit comfortably within the global range for tropical forests and actually exceed values reported for several other tropical dry deciduous forests in India. Leaves dominated the mix, contributing between 80.65 and 83.35 percent of total litterfall, followed by twigs, branches, and other material.</p>
<p>The seasonal signal was unmistakable. Litter production peaked in March at all four sites, coinciding with the height of the dry season, when water stress triggers leaf senescence and abscission in deciduous trees. Statistical analysis confirmed that month-to-month variation within sites was highly significant, while differences among the four forests were not. In other words, climate and phenology, not site identity, are the primary engines driving litterfall in these ecosystems. Standing litter biomass followed the same rhythm, accumulating to a maximum in March and dwindling to a minimum during the rainy and post-rainy months of August through November, with annual means ranging from 2.39 megagrams per hectare at Andhari to 2.68 at Medha.</p>
<p>The speed at which that litter disappeared was the study&#8217;s most striking finding. Using the classic litterbag technique, the researchers placed 20-gram samples of mixed-species fresh leaf litter, collected during the February-March peak litterfall period, into 20-by-20-centimeter nylon bags with one-millimeter mesh and laid them on the forest floor in a completely randomized design. Six bags were retrieved from each site every month. Roughly 95 percent of the initial litter mass had vanished within six months at every site. The fitted decay constants ranged from 5.75 to 6.65 per year, corresponding to half-lives of just 38 to 44 days. Model-based extrapolation suggested that 99 percent decomposition would be achieved within 274 to 318 days, although the authors caution that these figures extend beyond the six-month observation window.</p>
<p>Litter turnover rates told a similar story. The ratio of annual litterfall to standing litter biomass, a standard index of how quickly organic matter cycles through the forest floor, ranged from 3.59 to 4.22 per year, equivalent to residence times of only 87 to 102 days. Those turnover rates are higher than values reported for tropical semi-deciduous, tropical dry evergreen, and tropical evergreen forests, indicating that these small sacred groves process organic matter unusually fast. The researchers attribute the rapid decay to favorable temperature and moisture conditions during the decomposition period, which stimulate microbial activity, possibly combined with relatively high litter nutrient quality.</p>
<p>That quality question was addressed through chemical analysis of the mixed-species litter. Initial concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium differed significantly among the four forests, with Papanga showing the highest nutrient levels and the most favorable stoichiometric profile. Correlation analyses revealed that initial nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations were significantly associated with decomposition rates, while carbon content was not. The authors note an important caveat: lignin and cellulose, structural compounds that strongly regulate decomposability, were not measured, so the full biochemical picture of litter quality in these forests remains incomplete.</p>
<p>Nutrient release during decomposition followed a clear hierarchy: potassium was lost fastest, followed by nitrogen, then phosphorus. Potassium, highly soluble and prone to leaching, declined rapidly throughout the experiment, with release reaching 98.72 to 99.20 percent across the sites. Nitrogen loss ranged from 92.26 to 95.08 percent, and phosphorus from 80.54 to 95.34 percent after six months. Papanga recorded the highest total nutrient loss at 96.57 percent. Meanwhile, nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations actually increased in the residual litter, a pattern the researchers attribute to microbial immobilization, in which decomposer organisms accumulate these nutrients in their own biomass before releasing them back to the soil. Carbon concentrations remained relatively stable at Andhari and Medha but declined at Dedungri and Papanga.</p>
<p>The study&#8217;s authors are candid about its limitations. There were no non-sacred control forests for direct comparison, so the work characterizes variation within sacred forests rather than testing the effects of sacred-forest protection itself. Repeated temporal observations were not analyzed with mixed-effects models, and the correlation results should be read as associations rather than causal claims. Still, the baseline data fill a genuine gap: while litterfall and nutrient cycling have been extensively documented in tropical evergreen forests and, to a lesser degree, in sacred groves elsewhere in India, comparable information for the dry deciduous sacred forests of Western Odisha had been essentially absent.</p>
<p>The implications extend beyond ecology into conservation policy. Sacred forests persist as biodiversity hotspots and providers of ecosystem services, including carbon sequestration, water regulation, and soil conservation, precisely because community restrictions limit timber extraction, grazing, and fuelwood collection. Yet pressures such as fuelwood harvesting, livestock grazing, and non-timber forest product extraction persist to varying degrees, with Andhari and Dedungri showing signs of moderate degradation while Medha and Papanga remain relatively well preserved. By demonstrating that these culturally protected patches sustain high litter production, rapid decomposition, and substantial nutrient turnover, the study provides quantitative evidence that sacred forests function as localized reservoirs of soil fertility in human-dominated landscapes. As land-use intensification continues across tropical India, the researchers argue, protecting these living laboratories of biocultural conservation may be one of the most cost-effective strategies for maintaining nutrient cycling and ecological resilience in dry deciduous landscapes.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Litterfall production, decomposition rates, and nutrient cycling in tropical dry deciduous sacred forests of Western Odisha, India</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Litterfall dynamics and decomposition-driven nutrient cycling in sacred forests of Eastern India</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Pradhan, A., Mansingh, A., Gopinath, J. S., &amp; Ekka, N. J. (2026). Litterfall dynamics and decomposition-driven nutrient cycling in sacred forests of Eastern India. <em>Discover Plants, 3</em>(1), Article 412. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44372-026-00892-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44372-026-00892-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44372-026-00892-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44372-026-00892-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> litterfall, decomposition, nutrient cycling, sacred forests, tropical dry deciduous forest, Odisha, Shorea robusta, litterbags, soil fertility, ecosystem functioning, biocultural conservation, leaf litter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">203216</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tree Diversity and Fungal Partners Drive Forest Life Below Ground More Than Above</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/tree-diversity-and-fungal-partners-drive-forest-life-below-ground-more-than-above/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gavin Prescott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 04:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[below ground ecosystem dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[belowground ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecosystem functioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forest biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest biodiversity drivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungal partnerships in forest health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of tree composition on soil life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multitrophic interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mycorrhiza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mycorrhizal fungi and tree diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature Ecology & Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of fungi in forest ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil food webs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microorganisms in forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil nutrient exchange in forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symbiosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tree diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tree species diversity impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trophic levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underground forest ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underground interactions in forests]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=193710</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A large-scale forest experiment reveals that tree species richness and mycorrhizal fungal dominance independently shape biodiversity across food webs, with the strongest effects occurring below ground.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forests are often celebrated for what we can see — the towering trunks, layered canopies, and the birds and insects that move through them. Yet a new study published in Nature Ecology &amp; Evolution suggests that much of the real action in a forest ecosystem happens underground, where an intricate web of roots, fungi, and soil organisms responds to the composition of the trees above in ways that scientists are only beginning to untangle. The research, based on a large-scale experiment combining tree diversity with mycorrhizal fungal dominance, provides some of the clearest evidence yet that two fundamental features of forest stands — how many tree species grow together and which types of root-associated fungi dominate — independently shape biodiversity across multiple trophic levels.</p>
<p>The study addresses a long-standing puzzle in forest ecology. For decades, researchers have documented that forests with more tree species tend to support more diverse communities of animals, fungi, and microorganisms, a pattern broadly consistent with the idea that greater plant diversity creates more niches, more resources, and more structural complexity. At the same time, ecologists have recognized that nearly all tree species form symbiotic relationships with mycorrhizal fungi — root-dwelling partners that exchange soil nutrients for plant carbon — and that the two dominant types of these symbioses, associated with different nutrient-acquisition strategies, create profoundly different soil environments. What has remained unclear is whether these two factors operate independently, interact with one another, or merely reflect the same underlying gradient of forest conditions.</p>
<p>Disentangling these effects requires a special kind of experiment, one in which tree diversity and mycorrhizal composition are manipulated deliberately rather than merely observed. The researchers behind the new study designed exactly such an experiment, establishing forest plots in which the number of tree species and the identity of the mycorrhizal types associated with those trees were controlled in a replicated design. This approach allowed the team to statistically separate the influence of tree species richness from the influence of mycorrhizal dominance, and to measure how each factor cascades through food webs both above the soil surface and within it.</p>
<p>The central finding is striking: tree diversity and mycorrhizal type each exert their own distinct influence on the diversity of organisms at higher trophic levels, and these influences do not simply collapse into a single combined effect. In other words, a forest&#8217;s capacity to support diverse communities of herbivores, predators, decomposers, and microbes depends both on how many tree species are present and on which fungal symbionts dominate the root systems — and knowing one of these factors does not allow scientists to predict the other. This independence has important implications, because it means that conservation and restoration strategies targeting only one of these dimensions may miss critical levers for supporting biodiversity.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most consequential result concerns the direction of these effects relative to the soil surface. While tree diversity and mycorrhizal composition shaped communities both above and below ground, the strength of their influence was consistently greater below ground. Organisms living in the soil — from fungal and bacterial decomposers to root-feeding insects and the predators that hunt them — responded more strongly to variation in tree diversity and mycorrhizal type than did organisms living in the canopy and on the forest floor above. This asymmetry makes intuitive sense once the biology is considered: soil communities are physically close to the roots and fungal networks through which trees channel carbon and draw up nutrients, so any change in the composition of those roots and symbionts propagates rapidly through the belowground food web.</p>
<p>The belowground emphasis of the findings adds to a growing appreciation among ecologists that soils are not merely a substrate supporting plant life but a vast reservoir of biodiversity in their own right. A single handful of forest soil can contain thousands of species of bacteria, fungi, and microscopic animals, many of which remain formally undescribed. These organisms drive the decomposition of organic matter, the cycling of nitrogen and phosphorus, and the formation of soil structure — processes on which forest productivity and, ultimately, the global carbon cycle depend. If the diversity and composition of these communities are governed largely by the trees and their fungal partners above them, then the way forests are planted, managed, and restored will echo through soil ecosystems for decades.</p>
<p>The mycorrhizal dimension of the study deserves particular attention. Trees are commonly categorized by the type of mycorrhizal association they form, with two major groups dominating temperate and boreal forests. One group of fungi is especially adept at accessing nitrogen directly from organic matter in the soil, while the other excels at scavenging inorganic nutrients over larger soil volumes. These different strategies leave different chemical fingerprints on the soil: stands dominated by one mycorrhizal type tend to accumulate organic layers and cycle nutrients more slowly, while stands dominated by the other foster faster decomposition and different microbial assemblages. By manipulating which type dominated their experimental plots, the researchers could show that these fungal legacies shape entire communities of soil organisms independently of how many tree species were planted.</p>
<p>The experimental design also allowed the team to examine how the two factors play out across trophic levels — the successive tiers of a food web, from primary producers through herbivores and decomposers to predators. The results indicate that the influence of tree diversity and mycorrhizal type propagates upward and outward through these levels, affecting not only the organisms that directly consume plant material or live on roots, but also the predators and higher-order consumers that depend on them. This multitrophic perspective is critical for understanding ecosystem functioning, because the diversity of consumers influences processes such as herbivore control, pollination, and the rate at which organic matter is broken down and its nutrients returned to the soil.</p>
<p>For forest managers and policymakers, the findings arrive at a moment when tree planting and forest restoration have become central pillars of climate and biodiversity policy around the world. Ambitious pledges to plant billions of trees frequently emphasize quantity — how many trees, how many hectares — while giving far less attention to which species are planted and in what combinations. The new study suggests that such considerations are not ecological fine print but fundamental determinants of how much biodiversity a restored forest can support. Mixtures of tree species spanning different mycorrhizal types, the results imply, are likely to support richer and more functionally robust communities both above and below ground than monocultures or narrowly composed plantations.</p>
<p>The research also carries implications for how scientists model and predict the consequences of global environmental change. As climate shifts, air pollution alters nutrient deposition, and land-use change simplifies forests, both tree diversity and the relative abundance of different mycorrhizal types are expected to change — often in ways that reinforce one another. Understanding that these two drivers operate independently gives modelers a clearer framework for predicting how forest biodiversity will respond, and it highlights the belowground realm as the arena where those responses will be felt most strongly and most rapidly. It is a reminder that the invisible architecture of roots and fungi beneath a forest floor may be as important to the future of biodiversity as the visible trees rising above it.</p>
<p>Beyond their immediate findings, studies of this kind contribute to a broader methodological shift in ecology. Observational surveys, while valuable, often struggle to separate correlated variables, because in natural forests tree species richness and mycorrhizal composition frequently co-vary with soil age, moisture, and land-use history. Manipulative experiments such as the one underlying this research allow ecologists to assign plots to combinations of tree species and mycorrhizal types at random, so that differences in biodiversity among plots can be attributed with confidence to the manipulated factors rather than to confounding environmental gradients. This is the same logic that underpins long-running grassland biodiversity experiments, which helped establish the relationship between plant diversity and ecosystem productivity decades ago, now extended to forest systems where trees interact with symbiotic fungi over much longer timescales.</p>
<p>The distinction between the two major mycorrhizal types also connects to fundamental biogeochemistry. Because one type mobilizes nitrogen from organic residues while the other relies more heavily on inorganic uptake, the two associations are associated with different rates of carbon storage in soils and different patterns of nutrient loss through leaching. Communities of decomposer animals, bacteria, and protists assemble differently under these contrasting conditions, which helps explain why belowground food webs responded so strongly in the experiment. For restoration practice, the practical takeaway is that species selection lists for planting programs could usefully include mycorrhizal type alongside growth rate and climate suitability, ensuring that new forests recreate not only the visible structure of natural stands but also the subterranean partnerships that sustain their biodiversity.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> The independent effects of tree diversity and mycorrhizal fungal type on above- and belowground multitrophic biodiversity in forests.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Tree diversity and mycorrhizal type independently shape multitrophic biodiversity, with stronger effects belowground than aboveground</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Yi, H., Ferlian, O., Becker, P. J., Christel, H., Huang, Y., Köhler, M., Meier, I. C., Ul Haq, H., Wubet, T., &amp; Eisenhauer, N. (2026). Tree diversity and mycorrhizal type independently shape multitrophic biodiversity, with stronger effects belowground than aboveground. <em>Nature Ecology &amp;amp; Evolution, 10</em>(9), 1628-1643. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-026-03147-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-026-03147-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-026-03147-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41559-026-03147-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> tree diversity, mycorrhiza, forest ecology, biodiversity, soil food webs, belowground ecology, ecosystem functioning, symbiosis, trophic levels, forest restoration, Nature Ecology &amp; Evolution, multitrophic interactions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">193710</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
