<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ecological stoichiometry &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/ecological-stoichiometry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 14:01:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Rings of Power: How Key Biomolecules Could Tame Nutrient Cycles in Aquatic Food Webs</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/rings-of-power-how-key-biomolecules-could-tame-nutrient-cycles-in-aquatic-food-webs/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gavin Prescott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 14:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aquaculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aquatic food webs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aquatic nutrient cycles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomolecular packages in food webs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomolecules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomolecules regulating nutrient dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological stoichiometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological stoichiometry and Redfield ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essential amino acids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eutrophic lakes and algae blooms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eutrophication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food web nutrient transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen and phosphorus pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient cycles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient flow in aquatic ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient forms and ecosystem health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient management in freshwater systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphorus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planetary boundaries and nutrient overload]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategies for mitigating nutrient pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zooplankton]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=254249</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new conceptual paper argues that the biomolecular packaging of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, not their elemental ratios, governs nutrient cycling in aquatic food webs and could turn eutrophic ponds into regenerative nutrient-capture systems.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Global nutrient cycles are running dangerously hot. Humanity has already pushed nitrogen and phosphorus flows beyond the safe operating space of Earth&#8217;s planetary boundaries, and the consequences are visible in every eutrophic lake and algae-choked pond. A new conceptual paper published in Web Ecology by Koushik Roy and Jan Mraz of the University of South Bohemia argues that the scientific community has been tackling this crisis with the wrong toolkit. The problem, they contend, is not simply how much carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus circulate through ecosystems, but in which biomolecular packages those elements arrive at the animals that sit above the primary producers. Their provocative answer borrows a metaphor from fantasy fiction: certain nutrient forms act like rings of power, orchestrating the fate of entire nutrient cycles in aquatic food webs.</p>
<p>For decades, ecologists have understood food webs through the lens of elemental ratios. Ecological stoichiometry, built on the famous Redfield ratio, treats carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus as the fundamental currencies of life, tracking how these elements flow from algae to zooplankton to fish. Roy and Mraz acknowledge that this framework works reasonably well up to the level of primary producers. Plants, fungi, and protists genuinely do grow on free forms of elements, and the more nitrogen or phosphorus is fertilized into their environment, the more they grow. But the moment you move above the producers, the logic breaks down, and this is where the authors believe ecology has gone astray.</p>
<p>Animals, unlike plants, do not grow on free elemental nitrogen or phosphorus. They require biomolecules: proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, phospholipids, and specific amino acids. The evidence for this disconnect is striking. In fish, a meta-analysis of diet manipulation studies and field surveys found that the mean effect of dietary nitrogen-to-phosphorus ratios on excretion ratios was not significantly different from zero. This led researchers to hypothesize that future work must consider not just the ratios of nutrients in the diet but the molecular forms in which they are delivered. Roy and Mraz take this hypothesis to its logical conclusion: total nitrogen in seston or algae may be essentially meaningless for a zooplankter or a fish. What matters is the nitrogen bound in essential amino acids such as lysine and methionine, the carbon carried in digestible non-protein fractions like starch, and the phosphorus packaged in phospholipids rather than in apatite or phytate forms.</p>
<p>The authors illustrate this with concrete examples from fish nutrition. Supply the same amount of nitrogen to fish mainly through non-essential amino acids, and growth is modest; supply it through essential amino acids, and growth improves markedly. Deliver carbon through a high-protein diet versus non-protein energy fractions on an isoenergetic basis, and the non-protein route yields better growth. Phosphorus storage in fish remains low whenever key biomolecular packages are in short supply, regardless of how much total phosphorus the diet contains. These interactions, well documented in animal nutrition literature, are systematically overlooked in food web ecology, where carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus are mathematically treated as if every atom were equivalent.</p>
<p>Why does this matter so much for animals? The answer lies in evolutionary physiology. Consumers above the primary producers have lost roughly half of their amino acid synthesis capabilities, including the ability to make essential amino acids. Unlike plants, animals cannot use photonic energy to synthesize biomass from absorbed elements; they must first catabolize energy-rich molecules to fuel the synthesis and storage of new matter. Their bodies are governed by homeostatic control, meaning they cannot simply mirror the elemental composition of their food. The fates of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus inside an animal, whether retained in biomass or excreted back into the environment, are dictated by a handful of key biomolecules whose required proportions shift relative to the energy available from non-key molecules.</p>
<p>This is where the rings of power concept acquires its practical teeth. When surplus energy comes from dietary non-key biomolecules such as starch, glycogen, saturated fats, or non-essential amino acids, the animal&#8217;s requirement for expensive key biomolecules drops, and more dietary nitrogen and phosphorus remain locked in body tissue. When energy from non-key biomolecules is inadequate, the animal is forced to burn its own key biomolecules for fuel, destroying them and releasing their nitrogen and phosphorus back into the water. In the authors&#8217; framing, sufficient rings of power abolish the nutrient-energy transfer barriers between food and body and suppress nutrient leakage from consumers. When the rings are missing, ecosystems degrade into a soup of free nutrients: primary productivity overshoots, secondary and tertiary productivity stall, and the chain of trophic transfer efficiency breaks down entirely.</p>
<p>The concept has immediate relevance for one of the most stubborn water quality problems on the planet. Nutrients from human settlements, agricultural runoff, and farming accumulate in standing water bodies like the drain of a shower sink, driving harmful algal blooms and hypoxic dead zones. Roy and Mraz point out that specific rings of power, such as the amino acid lysine, saturated fatty acids, and the carbohydrate starch, go missing from pond plankton over the vegetative season or are absent throughout it. Their absence impedes the assimilation of nutrients into the bodies of aquatic consumers, leaving nitrogen and phosphorus freely available in the water column. Fish excretion alone can support a significant proportion of lake primary productivity, so the nutritional state of fish stocks directly modulates how much phosphorus recycles versus how much stays locked in biomass.</p>
<p>The proposed solution is audacious: design stoichiometrically corrective seasonal feeds spiked with the rings of power and deploy them in hypertrophic inland water bodies to convert pollution into harvestable biomass. In spring and autumn, digestible non-protein energy feeds would tip the balance; in summer, feeds balanced in essential amino acids and non-protein energy would sustain it. Well-fed fish with high metabolic satiety and gut fullness would graze less actively on zooplankton, allowing the planktonic food web to keep carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus sequestered. Fish would additionally absorb orthophosphate directly from the water through their integuments, adding a second pathway for nutrient removal. Periodic stocking and harvesting of fish stocks would then physically crop the anthropogenic nutrients out of the ecosystem, transforming eutrophic ponds from points of pollution into regenerative solutions.</p>
<p>This approach deliberately exploits what the authors call a natural flaw. Natural food webs help digest nutrients, but metabolic assimilation is poorly constrained by stoichiometric errors and consumer homeostasis when diets are imbalanced. In nature, this is a deliberate error that keeps primary productivity running on the free nutrients leaked by consumers. Animal nutritionists have spent decades correcting precisely these flaws in commercial production systems, achieving far higher nutrient use efficiencies in poultry, pigs, and fish than were possible in the past. Roy and Mraz argue that this expertise, honed by commercial interest and physiological understanding, is exactly what ecology has been missing, and they call for the establishment of nutritional ecology as a formal field within educational and research organizations, with animal nutritionists trained and tasked to work on ecological applications.</p>
<p>The rings of power concept is, at this stage, a conceptual framework rather than a proven remedy, and the authors are candid about its speculative nature. Yet it arrives at a moment when conventional remediation, chemical treatments, and algae- or microbe-based biotechnologies struggle against the sheer scale of global eutrophication. If even a fraction of the framework holds under field testing, the implications ripple outward: pond aquaculture could become a nutrient-capture industry, fishponds across temperate Europe could double as water purification infrastructure, and the stubborn boundary between the science of what animals eat and the science of how ecosystems work might finally be bridged. Sometimes, the authors suggest, the most powerful tool for saving an ecosystem is not a new chemical or a new organism, but a better understanding of the molecular packages in which nature&#8217;s elements already travel.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Biomolecular control of nutrient cycling in aquatic food webs and regenerative aquaculture</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> The Rings of Power: managing nutrient cycles in aquatic food webs above and beyond primary producers</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Roy, K., &amp; Mraz, J. (2026). The Rings of Power: managing nutrient cycles in aquatic food webs above and beyond primary producers. <em>Web Ecology, 26</em>(1), 27-33. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/we-26-27-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.5194/we-26-27-2026</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/we-26-27-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.5194/we-26-27-2026</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> nutrient cycles, aquatic food webs, ecological stoichiometry, eutrophication, fish nutrition, essential amino acids, phosphorus, nitrogen, zooplankton, aquaculture, biomolecules, water quality</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">254249</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ancient Torreya Trees Are Quietly Starving for Potassium, Century-Long Study Reveals</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/ancient-torreya-trees-are-quietly-starving-for-potassium-century-long-study-reveals/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gavin Prescott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 04:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ancient Torreya trees potassium depletion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ancient trees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[century-long forest soil chemistry changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chronosequence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological stoichiometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of nutrient depletion on ancient tree longevity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of potassium deficiency on tree health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implications of nutrient loss in ancient cultivated trees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaf-litter-soil continuum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term ecological research on Torreya grandis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term forest nutrient cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[millennial tree ecosystem study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient recycling in old-growth trees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient resorption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[potassium depletion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of potassium in forest ecosystem sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil acidification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil nutrient analysis in ancient forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil-plant nutrient dynamics over centuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stoichiometric homeostasis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torreya grandis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=240262</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A 100-to-1,600-year chronosequence of ancient Torreya grandis plantations reveals progressive soil potassium depletion and collapsing nutrient resorption efficiency in the oldest trees.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the oldest cultivated trees on Earth are running out of a nutrient that most ecologists rarely worry about. A new study of Torreya grandis, the Chinese nutmeg tree whose ancient plantations in Zhejiang Province have been tended for up to sixteen centuries, shows that these millennial giants face a progressive and potentially severe depletion of potassium in their soils, and that the shortage is quietly unraveling the nutrient-recycling machinery that has sustained them for generations. The findings, published in the journal Plant and Soil, offer a rare long-term window into how the chemistry of a forest ecosystem changes over timescales that span the rise and fall of dynasties.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Mengyuan Chang and Zongxing Wang of Zhejiang A&amp;F University, took advantage of an extraordinary natural experiment: a chronosequence of Torreya grandis stands ranging from 100 to 1,600 years old. Because the trees in each age group grow under broadly similar climate and management traditions, differences among the groups can be attributed largely to age itself. The researchers sampled the full leaf-litter-soil continuum, measuring concentrations of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in green leaves, fallen litter, and soil at two depths, and then calculated how efficiently the trees resorbed each nutrient before leaf drop.</p>
<p>The soil results told a story of slow but relentless change. Organic carbon and total nitrogen in the soil actually increased as stands aged, a pattern consistent with centuries of litter accumulation and organic matter buildup. Total phosphorus remained relatively stable across all age groups in both the 0-10 and 10-20 centimeter layers. But potassium broke the pattern dramatically: soil total potassium declined consistently with tree age, signaling what the authors describe as progressive potassium depletion. In other words, the very nutrient that plants need in large quantities for enzyme activation, stomatal regulation, and stress tolerance was steadily draining away from the system over the centuries.</p>
<p>The trees themselves reflected this depletion. Leaf concentrations of carbon, nitrogen, and potassium all decreased with tree age, while leaf phosphorus held comparatively steady. This divergence matters because leaf chemistry is a sensitive indicator of what a tree can actually extract from its environment. A falling leaf potassium concentration in the oldest stands suggests that the trees were no longer able to take up enough of the element to maintain the internal concentrations seen in their younger counterparts, even as they continued to photosynthesize and grow on the accumulated organic capital of their soils.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most striking result concerned nutrient resorption efficiency, the process by which trees withdraw valuable nutrients from senescing leaves before they fall, effectively recycling their own biochemical investments. Resorption efficiencies of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium all declined substantially as tree age increased, but potassium resorption showed by far the largest drop, plummeting from about 75 percent in the youngest stands to just 32 percent in the oldest. For a tree, losing the ability to salvage three-quarters of the potassium in its leaves before abscission represents a fundamental shift in nutrient economy, forcing greater dependence on an increasingly depleted soil pool.</p>
<p>The drivers behind these shifts were traced through statistical modeling of soil chemistry. Nitrogen resorption efficiency responded primarily to soil nitrogen availability, specifically the concentrations of nitrate and ammonium, the two inorganic forms plants can absorb directly. Phosphorus and potassium resorption, by contrast, were more sensitive to soil potassium levels and pH. This dissociation suggests that different nutrients are governed by different environmental levers, and that a one-size-fits-all fertilization strategy would fail to address the specific bottlenecks emerging in ancient stands.</p>
<p>To integrate these relationships, the team employed structural equation modeling, a technique that allows researchers to test networks of hypothesized cause-and-effect pathways simultaneously. The analysis revealed that tree age influences nutrient resorption efficiency primarily indirectly, through its effects on soil nutrient stoichiometry and on the stoichiometry of leaves and litter. Crucially, potassium-related imbalances exerted the most negative influence on resorption efficiency of any factor examined. The implication is that potassium is not merely one nutrient among several running low; it acts as a keystone element whose scarcity destabilizes the balance of nitrogen and phosphorus cycling throughout the ecosystem.</p>
<p>This finding resonates with a growing body of global evidence. A 2023 meta-analysis cited in the study highlighted that potassium limitation is far more widespread in terrestrial ecosystems than classical nutrient-paradigm thinking, which has long focused on nitrogen and phosphorus, would suggest. Potassium is unusual among macronutrients because it does not form part of any organic structural compound; it exists in plant tissue as a free ion, which means it is easily leached from litter and soils and cannot be locked into stable organic pools the way nitrogen and phosphorus can. Over sixteen centuries of continuous cultivation and harvest, that mobility appears to have worked against the ancient Torreya stands.</p>
<p>The study also touches on the concept of stoichiometric homeostasis, the ability of organisms to maintain stable internal elemental ratios despite variation in what their environment supplies. As the ancient trees aged, their capacity to buffer against shifting soil chemistry appears to have weakened, leaving them increasingly exposed to the elemental imbalances developing around their roots. Combined with the region&#8217;s history of high atmospheric nitrogen deposition, which earlier work on Torreya plantations suggested can blunt the benefits of conventional fertilization, the picture that emerges is one of multiple nutrient stresses compounding one another in the oldest stands.</p>
<p>For conservationists, the practical implications are concrete. The authors argue that soil test-based nutrient management, including targeted potassium fertilization and measures to prevent soil acidification, could help sustain the ancient Torreya grandis forests, which are both culturally treasured and economically important for their edible nuts. More broadly, the study underscores that ancient trees are not simply younger trees scaled up in time; they occupy a distinct biogeochemical state shaped by centuries of nutrient cycling, and protecting them may require understanding and correcting elemental deficits that only become visible across millennial timescales. As the world&#8217;s oldest living trees face mounting pressures from climate change and land-use intensification, this research suggests that what lies beneath them, in the slow chemistry of their soils, may matter as much as what threatens them above ground.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Long-term soil potassium depletion and nutrient resorption dynamics in millennial-aged Torreya grandis forests</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Potassium depletion and reduced nitrogen resorption intensifies the nutrient constraints in millennial-aged Torreya grandis forests</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Chang, M., Wang, Z., Fan, Y., Jin, S., &amp; Xie, H. (2026). Potassium depletion and reduced nitrogen resorption intensifies the nutrient constraints in millennial-aged Torreya grandis forests. <em>Plant and Soil</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09116-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09116-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09116-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11104-026-09116-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Torreya grandis, potassium depletion, nutrient resorption, ecological stoichiometry, ancient trees, chronosequence, soil science, forest ecology, stoichiometric homeostasis, leaf-litter-soil continuum, nitrogen cycling, soil acidification</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">240262</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nitrogen-Rich Leaf Litter Turns Soil Microbes into Carbon Storage Machines</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/nitrogen-rich-leaf-litter-turns-soil-microbes-into-carbon-storage-machines/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 23:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amino sugars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadleaved forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate resilience through forest composition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison of broadleaved and coniferous forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coniferous forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological stoichiometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of leaf litter quality on soil health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest management for carbon storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest soil microbial communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of leaf litter nitrogen content on soil carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of tree species on soil carbon stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lignin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litter nitrogen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial carbon pump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial contribution to soil carbon dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial necromass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial residue carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen-rich leaf litter decomposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of microbes in carbon storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil carbon sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil organic carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil organic matter formation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=236158</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New research shows that nitrogen-rich broadleaved leaf litter drives soil carbon sequestration by fueling microbial growth and the accumulation of stable microbial residue carbon.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deep in the floor of every forest, an invisible transformation is taking place that may help determine how much carbon the planet&#8217;s soils can lock away. When leaves fall and decompose, they feed vast communities of bacteria and fungi, and when those microbes die, their bodies become part of the soil itself. A new study published in the journal Plant and Soil suggests that the nitrogen content of fallen leaf litter is the single most important factor controlling this process, with nitrogen-rich broadleaved forests proving far more effective at building stable soil carbon than their coniferous counterparts. The findings, led by Min Zhang of Hebei Agricultural University together with colleagues in China and Germany, offer a fresh perspective on why some forests store carbon better than others and how tree species choice could shape the climate resilience of landscapes for decades to come.</p>
<p>For much of the history of soil science, researchers assumed that the slow decay of tough plant compounds such as lignin was the main route by which organic matter accumulated in soils. That view has been overturned in the past decade. Today, a growing body of evidence indicates that a large share of stable soil organic carbon is not plant material at all, but the residues of dead microorganisms, often called microbial necromass or microbial residue carbon. Microbes consume plant litter, build their own biomass, and when they die, their cell walls and other structural molecules bind to soil minerals and persist far longer than most raw plant debris. This pathway, sometimes described as the microbial carbon pump, effectively converts labile plant carbon into a more durable form. Understanding what controls the pump has become a central question for scientists trying to predict how soils will respond to climate change and shifting vegetation.</p>
<p>The research team set out to answer that question by comparing three types of forest stands: broadleaved forests, coniferous forests, and mixed forests. In each, they measured the chemical quality of the leaf litter, the total soil organic carbon content and its various fractions, and two powerful molecular fingerprints of carbon origin. Amino sugars served as markers for microbial residues, allowing the researchers to distinguish carbon left behind by bacteria from carbon left behind by fungi. Lignin phenols, meanwhile, acted as tracers of plant-derived carbon and revealed how far the lignin in the litter had been degraded. To probe the nutritional state of the microbial communities, the team applied an ecological stoichiometric approach, which evaluates whether microbes are limited more by carbon, nitrogen, or phosphorus based on the balance of these elements in their environment.</p>
<p>The results revealed a striking pattern. Broadleaved forest litter contained the lowest lignin content and the least carbon lability, meaning its carbon was less readily decomposable, but it boasted the highest levels of nitrogen, phosphorus, and cellulose, as well as the highest ratio of nitrogen to lignin. These stands also showed the greatest microbial nitrogen limitation, the highest total soil organic carbon, and, crucially, the largest accumulations of microbial residue carbon, including both bacterial residue carbon and fungal residue carbon. Lignin phenol concentrations and the degree of lignin degradation were likewise highest under broadleaved trees. In other words, the forests with the most nitrogen-rich, easily digestible litter were the ones where microbes were working hardest, dying in greatest numbers, and leaving the most residue behind.</p>
<p>Across all three stand types, the researchers observed that microbial residue carbon and plant residue carbon accumulated in step with total soil organic carbon, suggesting that both sources contribute synchronously to the growing carbon pool rather than one simply replacing the other. To identify which factors mattered most, the team used random forest analysis, a machine learning technique that ranks the influence of many variables simultaneously. The verdict was unambiguous: litter nitrogen emerged as the primary driver of microbial residue carbon accumulation, outweighing other litter characteristics such as lignin content or carbon lability.</p>
<p>But correlation alone does not establish mechanism, so the researchers turned to structural equation modeling, a statistical framework that allows scientists to test hypothesized chains of cause and effect. The model supported a compelling sequence. Higher litter nitrogen intensified the microbial nitrogen limitation, and that intensified limitation in turn promoted the accumulation of microbial residue carbon. This may seem counterintuitive at first glance: why would nitrogen limitation stimulate carbon storage? The likely explanation lies in microbial physiology. When nitrogen-rich litter raises the nitrogen supply relative to microbial demand, it spurs microbial growth and activity, and microbes constrained by nitrogen must invest more effort in acquiring it, processing more carbon in the process and building more biomass that eventually becomes residue. The nitrogen limitation detected by the stoichiometric analysis thus reflects a dynamic, growth-driven system in which abundant nitrogen fuels the microbial engine that converts plant carbon into persistent soil carbon.</p>
<p>The study also traced the consequences of this microbial activity for the composition and stability of the soil carbon pool. The accumulation of microbial residue carbon, and particularly bacterial residue carbon, increased the content of recalcitrant organic carbon, the fraction of soil organic carbon that resists decomposition. At the same time, this shift reduced the overall carbon lability of the soil, meaning a smaller proportion of the carbon pool was readily available for microbes to respire back into the atmosphere as carbon dioxide. In practical terms, nitrogen-rich broadleaved litter did not just add more carbon to the soil; it changed the character of that carbon, steering it toward a more stable, longer-lived form. This is a critical distinction, because the climate value of soil carbon depends not only on how much is stored but on how long it stays stored.</p>
<p>The implications extend well beyond forest ecology. As governments and land managers around the world pursue afforestation and reclamation programs to sequester carbon, the choice of tree species is often made on the basis of growth rates and timber value. This study suggests that litter chemistry deserves equal attention. Planting or encouraging nitrogen-rich broadleaved species could enhance the microbial carbon pump, boosting both the quantity and the stability of soil organic carbon. Conversely, stands dominated by conifers, whose litter is lignin-rich and nitrogen-poor, may build soil carbon more slowly and in a less stable form. In mixed forests, the researchers found intermediate patterns, hinting that species composition within a stand can be tuned to manage below-ground carbon dynamics. Such insights could inform everything from carbon credit accounting to the restoration of degraded soils.</p>
<p>The work also adds nuance to a long-running scientific debate about the role of nitrogen in decomposition. Nitrogen limitation of decay has been documented in many ecosystems, and some researchers have argued that it slows the breakdown of organic matter, potentially preserving soil carbon. The new findings suggest a more intricate picture: nitrogen availability shapes not only how fast litter decomposes but how effectively the products of decomposition are funneled into microbial biomass and, ultimately, into stable necromass. The microbial carbon pump, in this view, is throttled by the nitrogen supply in the litter, and managing that supply is a lever for managing soil carbon. As the authors conclude, shifts in stand type alter litter nitrogen, which primarily regulates soil organic carbon sequestration through this microbial pathway.</p>
<p>There remain open questions. The study was conducted across forest stands of different types, and future work will need to test whether the same relationships hold across climates, soil types, and timescales, and how disturbances such as fire, harvesting, or warming might disrupt the nitrogen-microbe-carbon chain. Data from the study will be made available on request, and the research was supported by funding from Chinese national and provincial science programs. For now, the message is clear and quietly profound: the fate of carbon in forest soils rests substantially on the shoulders of microscopic organisms, and what those organisms accomplish depends on the chemistry of the leaves that fall above them. A forest&#8217;s legacy in the soil, it turns out, is written as much in the nitrogen of its litter as in the wood of its trees.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> The role of litter nitrogen in regulating soil organic carbon sequestration through microbial residue carbon accumulation in forest soils</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Litter nitrogen drives soil organic carbon sequestration by promoting microbial residue carbon accumulation</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Zhang, M., Li, H., Wang, Y., Cui, Y., Gao, Y., Jia, Y., Yu, H., Dong, Q., Wang, Y., &amp; Xu, Z. (2026). Litter nitrogen drives soil organic carbon sequestration by promoting microbial residue carbon accumulation. <em>Plant and Soil</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09109-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09109-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09109-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11104-026-09109-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> soil organic carbon, microbial residue carbon, litter nitrogen, microbial carbon pump, forest soils, broadleaved forests, coniferous forests, lignin, amino sugars, ecological stoichiometry, carbon sequestration, microbial necromass</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">236158</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spiders&#8217; Bodies Shift Their Elemental Makeup Dramatically Across a Single Season</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/spiders-bodies-shift-their-elemental-makeup-dramatically-across-a-single-season/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Townsend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 09:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dietary influences on spider nutrient content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological role of spiders in nutrient dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological stoichiometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of prey consumption on spider chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excreta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food webs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insect predation impact on nutrient cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invertebrate predator nutrient footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invertebrate predators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larinioides cornutus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macronutrients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nickel bioaccumulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen and phosphorus in spiders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riparian ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riparian orb-weaver nutrient uptake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seasonal changes in spider body composition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seasonal shifts in predator elemental makeup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seasonal variation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spider-environment interactions across seasons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spiders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spiders' elemental chemistry seasonal variation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trace elements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trace elements in spider biology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=221738</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A season-long study of riparian orb-weaving spiders reveals that their body concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus, and trace elements—including a 287 percent rise in nickel—shift dramatically across a single growing season.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spiders eat an astonishing amount of the world&#8217;s insects. By some estimates, the global spider community consumes between 400 and 800 million tons of prey biomass every year, making these eight-legged predators one of the most influential groups of carnivores on land. Yet the way spiders process all that food—what they keep in their bodies and what they release back into the environment—has remained largely a black box, especially when it comes to how those processes change over time. A new study of a common riparian orb-weaver, Larinioides cornutus, now shows that the elemental chemistry of a spider&#8217;s body is anything but static. Over a single growing season, the concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus, and a suite of trace elements in these spiders shifted substantially, in some cases by hundreds of percent, suggesting that the nutrient footprint of invertebrate predators may be far more dynamic than ecologists have assumed.</p>
<p>The research, conducted by Colton Herzog and Shawn Wilder and published in the journal Ecology and Evolution, focused on adult female L. cornutus living in the vegetation along the banks of Lake McMurtry in Noble County, Oklahoma. From mid-June through early October, the team collected twenty spiders during each of seven sampling trips, timed at roughly two- to three-week intervals across the growing season. Each spider was brought into the laboratory and housed individually for seven days under controlled conditions of 25 degrees Celsius and a 14-hour light cycle, with water provided freely. This week-long holding period served a dual purpose: it allowed the animals to clear their guts completely, ensuring that any excreta collected came from the spiders themselves rather than from their last field meal, and it standardized conditions so that differences among sampling dates would reflect seasonal biology rather than laboratory artifacts.</p>
<p>After the holding period, a subset of spiders from each date was frozen, dried at 60 degrees Celsius for 72 hours, weighed to obtain whole-body dry mass, and ground into a homogeneous powder for chemical analysis. Carbon and nitrogen concentrations were measured at the University of Florida Stable Isotope Laboratory, while a broader suite of seventeen additional elements—including phosphorus, potassium, sodium, sulfur, and a range of trace metals—was quantified using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry at Oklahoma State University. In total, seventy spiders were analyzed for whole-body elemental composition. The remaining spiders were released at sites away from their original collection locations.</p>
<p>Excreta presented a more delicate analytical challenge. Spider waste is produced in tiny quantities, so the researchers pooled low-mass samples from different individuals within each sampling date to obtain enough material for carbon and nitrogen analysis, ultimately processing fifty excreta samples. Because pooling could theoretically distort the data, the team ran a careful series of checks, comparing pooled and unpooled samples for differences in variance, multivariate dispersion, and overall composition. None of these tests detected any effect of pooling, giving the authors confidence that their excreta measurements faithfully reflected the spiders&#8217; waste chemistry. All statistical analyses used generalized linear models with Julian day as a continuous predictor, comparing linear and quadratic seasonal patterns with Akaike&#8217;s Information Criterion.</p>
<p>The first major finding concerned body size and waste production. Both followed strikingly similar unimodal trajectories across the season. Spider dry mass rose from early summer, peaked around Julian day 220—August 7—and then declined toward October. Aggregate excreta production followed the same arc, peaking just eight days earlier, around July 30, and falling to its lowest levels at the beginning and end of the sampling period. This tight temporal alignment suggests that mid-summer spiders were both larger and processing more food, likely reflecting peak prey availability during the height of the growing season. The pattern is intuitively satisfying: when resources are abundant, predators eat more, grow more, and excrete more, all at once.</p>
<p>The elemental story, however, proved more surprising. While the carbon and nitrogen concentrations of spider excreta remained essentially stable across the entire season—changes of less than eleven percent that failed to reach statistical significance—the composition of the spiders&#8217; own bodies shifted dramatically. Whole-body nitrogen concentrations declined by 5.77 percent over the season, while phosphorus concentrations moved in the opposite direction, climbing by 25.3 percent. These opposing trajectories in two of the most ecologically important macronutrients mean that a spider eaten by a bird in June delivers a different nutrient package than one eaten in October. Because spiders occupy intermediate trophic levels, serving as both predators and prey, such shifts could ripple through food webs in both directions, altering the timing and composition of nutrient transfer to animals above them and to decomposers below.</p>
<p>The trace element results were even more dramatic. Eight elements—potassium, lithium, manganese, sodium, nickel, sulfur, silicon, and strontium—showed significant seasonal patterns in whole-body concentrations. Lithium rose by nearly 70 percent and silicon by 128 percent over the season, while strontium fell by almost 40 percent. Potassium and sodium followed non-monotonic, mid-season peaks that roughly coincided with the peak in body mass, hinting that shared seasonal drivers such as shifting prey communities or changing physiological demands shape both growth and elemental accumulation. Manganese, sulfur, and strontium have well-established roles in arthropod biology—sulfur in protein structure, strontium as a calcium analog incorporated into the exoskeleton, and manganese in enzymatic reactions and oxidative stress regulation—so their seasonal swings may track genuine physiological needs.</p>
<p>The most eye-catching result of all belonged to nickel, a trace metal with a strong propensity for bioaccumulation. Whole-body nickel concentrations in the spiders increased by a staggering 287 percent across the growing season. Nickel can act as a micronutrient at low doses, but it readily accumulates in arthropod tissues, and previous studies have documented similar accumulation in other spider taxa. The Oklahoma findings suggest that riparian orb-weavers may function as prominent transient sinks for nickel in their food webs, concentrating the metal from their prey and then potentially passing it upward to the birds, wasps, and other spiders that eat them—or releasing it into detrital pathways when they die. Whether consuming nickel-laden spider biomass carries physiological costs for those predators remains an open and potentially important question.</p>
<p>What emerges from this study is a picture of spiders as temporally variable reservoirs of biologically important elements rather than fixed chemical entities. The authors emphasize that the physiological mechanisms behind these shifts remain unresolved. Spiders may prioritize somatic growth early in the season and shift toward reproductive investment later, and because spider eggs differ compositionally from female somatic tissues and can represent a substantial share of total body mass, reproduction could substantially reshape whole-body chemistry. Diet almost certainly plays a role as well: invertebrate prey communities change composition through the season, and elements like lithium and silicon, which appear to be weakly regulated homeostatically, may simply mirror whatever the spiders happen to encounter in their food and environment.</p>
<p>For ecologists, the implications extend well beyond a single species of Oklahoma orb-weaver. If the elemental phenotype of an abundant invertebrate predator can swing this much within a few months, then models of predator-mediated nutrient cycling that assume constant body chemistry may be missing a crucial dimension of temporal variation. Spiders return nutrients to ecosystems through excreta, discarded prey remains, and mortality, and they also export nutrients upward through predation. Quantifying how those fluxes change with the seasons—and how trace metal accumulation in predator biomass affects the animals that consume it—will require integrating ecological stoichiometry with physiology and toxicology. This study provides a template for that integration, and a reminder that even the most familiar backyard predators are chemically far more changeable than they look.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Seasonal variation in whole-body elemental concentrations and excreta production of the riparian orb-weaving spider Larinioides cornutus</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Seasonal Variation in Whole‐Body Elemental Concentrations and Excreta Production of a Riparian Orb‐Weaving Spider (Larinioides cornutus)</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Herzog, C., &amp; Wilder, S. M. (2026). Seasonal Variation in Whole‐Body Elemental Concentrations and Excreta Production of a Riparian Orb‐Weaving Spider ( Larinioides cornutus ). <em>Ecology and Evolution, 16</em>(9), Article e74385. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.74385" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.74385</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.74385" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1002/ece3.74385</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> spiders, ecological stoichiometry, nutrient cycling, trace elements, nickel bioaccumulation, Larinioides cornutus, riparian ecosystems, excreta, seasonal variation, food webs, macronutrients, invertebrate predators</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">221738</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nitrogen Pollution Still Reshapes Forest Tree Chemistry Without Signs of Saturation</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/nitrogen-pollution-still-reshapes-forest-tree-chemistry-without-signs-of-saturation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 21:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atmospheric nitrogen deposition effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological stoichiometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecosystem responses to nitrogen pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of nitrogen on leaf chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental consequences of atmospheric nitrogen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global nitrogen cycle and forest ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implications of nitrogen pollution for forest health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaf stoichiometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term nitrogen deposition in subtropical ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelia wilsonii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen cycling in high-deposition forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen deposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen fertilization in evergreen forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nitrogen pollution impacts on forest tree chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen saturation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen saturation in forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient resorption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphorus limitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant and Soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil acidification from nitrogen deposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil organic carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subtropical forest]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=202612</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A field experiment in a high-nitrogen-deposition forest in western China shows that added nitrogen still alters the leaf carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus stoichiometry of the dominant tree Michelia wilsonii without any sign of nitrogen saturation.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the mist-shrouded evergreen forests of western China, one of the world&#8217;s most heavily nitrogen-polluted regions, scientists have uncovered a surprising twist in the story of how air pollution transforms ecosystems. A new field experiment shows that even in a forest already drenched by decades of atmospheric nitrogen deposition, adding more nitrogen still changes the leaf chemistry of the dominant tree species—and the trees show no sign of the much-feared condition known as nitrogen saturation. The findings, published in the journal Plant and Soil, challenge a long-standing assumption about how forests in high-deposition regions respond to continuing pollution, and they carry important implications for the future structure and function of subtropical ecosystems.</p>
<p>Nitrogen is the nutrient that most often limits plant growth, and human activities—from fossil fuel combustion to intensive agriculture—have more than doubled the amount of reactive nitrogen cycling through the global environment. When this nitrogen rains down on forests, it can fertilize trees, acidify soils, and shift the delicate balance of elements such as carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus within living tissue. Ecologists have long predicted that forests receiving chronically high nitrogen inputs should eventually reach</p>
<p>The concept of nitrogen saturation, formalized in influential syntheses of temperate forest research in the late 1990s, describes a sequence of stages through which a forest ecosystem passes as chronic nitrogen inputs accumulate. In the earliest stages, added nitrogen is captured efficiently by plants and soil microbes, stimulating growth and enhancing nutrient uptake. As deposition continues, however, the system&#8217;s capacity to retain nitrogen becomes exhausted: excess nitrate leaches into streams, soils acidify, base cations are depleted, and the availability of other nutrients, particularly phosphorus, becomes the principal constraint on plant productivity. Under this framework, forests in regions with decades of elevated deposition were expected to exhibit symptoms of saturation, including diminished growth responses to further nitrogen inputs and declining foliar nitrogen relative to phosphorus. The new study from western China complicates this tidy progression, finding that a dominant tree in a high-deposition subtropical forest continues to respond nutritionally to added nitrogen rather than showing the plateau or decline that saturation would predict.</p>
<p>The setting matters enormously for interpreting this result. Subtropical China receives some of the highest rates of atmospheric nitrogen deposition anywhere on Earth, driven by dense industrial activity, intensive fertilizer use, and rapid urbanization in the region. Yet the soils and vegetation of these humid, warm forests differ in fundamental ways from the temperate and boreal systems where the saturation model was originally developed. Subtropical forests tend to be phosphorus-limited rather than nitrogen-limited, with highly weathered, acidic soils that hold relatively little labile phosphorus. In such systems, nitrogen deposition can act as a partial fertilizer even at high background rates, because the trees have evolved under conditions where nitrogen availability fluctuates and phosphorus scarcity, not nitrogen scarcity, sets the ceiling on productivity. The evergreen secondary forest where Michelia wilsonii grows represents exactly this kind of environment, where the interplay between abundant nitrogen and constrained phosphorus shapes every aspect of plant nutrient strategy.</p>
<p>Stoichiometry, the study of the ratios of elements such as carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in living tissue, provides a powerful lens for reading these nutrient dynamics. Leaf carbon concentrations are typically quite stable across environmental gradients, reflecting the structural and metabolic constancy of the photosynthetic apparatus. Nitrogen and phosphorus, by contrast, vary considerably with supply, because both are essential to proteins, nucleic acids, and the energy-transfer machinery of cells. The ratio of nitrogen to phosphorus in leaves is widely used as an indicator of which nutrient limits plant growth at a given moment, while carbon-to-nutrient ratios reflect how efficiently plants convert assimilated carbon into nutrient-rich tissue. When nitrogen deposition alters these ratios, it signals a shift in the internal economy of the plant, with cascading consequences for herbivores, decomposers, and the recycling of nutrients through the ecosystem.</p>
<p>The experimental design employed in the study followed a now-standard approach in deposition research: plots received supplemental nitrogen at rates of zero, twenty, and forty kilograms of nitrogen per hectare per year, spanning the range of additional inputs that forests in the region might plausibly experience. By measuring leaf carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus concentrations alongside soil and microbial biomass pools, the researchers could trace how nitrogen moved through the ecosystem and where its effects originated. This multi-tiered sampling is critical because leaf chemistry does not respond to deposition in isolation; it reflects the integrated outcome of soil nutrient availability, microbial competition for nutrients, and the tree&#8217;s own physiological regulation of uptake and internal recycling.</p>
<p>One of the most intriguing patterns in the results is the non-linear response of leaf nitrogen and phosphorus, which rose at moderate nitrogen addition and then declined at the highest rate. This initial-increase-then-decline trajectory suggests that moderate nitrogen inputs relieve a nutrient constraint and allow the tree to enrich its foliage, but that heavier inputs trigger compensatory mechanisms or stress responses that pull nutrient concentrations back down. Possible explanations include increased leaching of nutrients from soils under heavier loading, soil acidification that reduces phosphorus availability, or physiological downregulation of uptake when the tree has accumulated sufficient nitrogen. The corresponding seasonal shifts in carbon-to-nitrogen and carbon-to-phosphorus ratios in summer samples reinforce the picture of a tree actively recalibrating its tissue chemistry as inputs change, rather than passively accumulating nitrogen.</p>
<p>Nutrient resorption, the process by which trees withdraw nitrogen and phosphorus from leaves before they are shed, is another key thread in the study. Resorption efficiency is a central component of nutrient conservation in evergreen species, which must sustain their foliage for multiple growing seasons in nutrient-poor environments. When soil nitrogen is abundant, trees typically reduce their reliance on resorption and instead draw more nitrogen directly from the soil, a shift that can loosen the tight internal cycling characteristic of infertile sites. The finding that resorption efficiencies followed the same rise-and-fall pattern as leaf nutrient concentrations indicates that deposition is reshaping not just what the leaves contain but how the tree manages its nutrient capital over time. Changes in resorption feed back into litter quality, which in turn alters decomposition rates and the release of nutrients back into the soil, closing a loop that connects deposition to the entire biogeochemical cycle of the forest floor.</p>
<p>The soil and microbial measurements add an important belowground dimension to the story. Soil organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon emerged as the primary determinants of variation in leaf stoichiometry, implicating the microbial community as a gatekeeper controlling nutrient flows to tree roots. Microbes and plant roots compete directly for nitrogen and phosphorus in the soil, and the elemental composition of microbial biomass determines whether immobilized nutrients are locked up in microbial tissue or released for plant uptake. Nitrogen deposition is known to shift microbial communities, favoring some groups over others and altering the balance of fungal and bacterial dominance, with consequences for carbon storage and nutrient turnover. The strong correlations observed between microbial biomass composition and leaf chemistry in this forest suggest that belowground responses are not merely a side effect of deposition but an active mediator of how trees experience added nitrogen.</p>
<p>The absence of nitrogen saturation in this system deserves particular attention. Several factors could explain why the forest has not crossed the saturation threshold despite high background deposition. The humid subtropical climate supports rapid plant growth and high nutrient demand, allowing trees and microbes to absorb substantial nitrogen inputs. Deep soils and abundant organic matter may provide large exchange and retention capacities. Moreover, if phosphorus availability, while low, is sufficient to support continued growth, then added nitrogen can still be converted into biomass rather than accumulating as excess. The authors&#8217; conclusion that high deposition continues to enhance the nutrition and growth of dominant species implies that these forests remain in the fertilization stage of the saturation sequence, a finding that extends the applicability of the saturation framework by revealing how differently it can unfold in subtropical versus temperate settings.</p>
<p>The ecological implications of this continued fertilization are far-reaching. If dominant species such as Michelia wilsonii gain a nutritional advantage under sustained deposition, they may outcompete subordinate species that are less able to exploit the extra nitrogen, simplifying forest composition and altering canopy structure. Shifts in leaf chemistry also propagate upward and downward through the food web, affecting insect herbivores whose foliar diets become more nitrogen-rich, and decomposer communities whose litter inputs change in quality. Over longer timescales, the combination of enhanced growth, altered litter chemistry, and modified microbial activity could change how much carbon these forests store, a question of global relevance given the role of subtropical forests in the terrestrial carbon sink. At the same time, the non-linear responses observed here caution against assuming that fertilization benefits will persist indefinitely; the decline in leaf nutrients at the highest addition rate hints that thresholds may exist beyond which negative effects emerge.</p>
<p>More broadly, the study underscores the value of examining plant responses to pollution through the integrated framework of ecological stoichiometry, which links leaf chemistry, soil processes, and microbial ecology into a single analytical picture. Rather than treating nitrogen deposition as a simple dose of fertilizer or toxin, this approach reveals it as a force that reorganizes the flow of multiple elements through an ecosystem, with effects that depend on season, soil properties, and the identity of the organisms involved. For forests across subtropical Asia, where deposition rates remain high and may continue to rise, understanding these element-coupled responses will be essential for predicting which species thrive, which decline, and how the structure and function of some of the world&#8217;s most biodiverse ecosystems will be reshaped in the decades ahead.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effects of nitrogen addition on leaf carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus stoichiometry of the dominant tree Michelia wilsonii in a high-nitrogen-deposition subtropical forest in western China.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> No N saturation, N addition still alters leaf stoichiometry of Michelia wilsonii in a high-N input forest</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Liu, S., Zheng, X., Xiao, Y., Wang, L., Li, H., You, C., Xu, L., Xu, H., Xu, Z., Tan, B., Yuan, Y., &amp; Zhang, L. (2026). No N saturation, N addition still alters leaf stoichiometry of Michelia wilsonii in a high-N input forest. <em>Plant and Soil</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09111-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09111-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09111-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11104-026-09111-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> nitrogen deposition, nitrogen saturation, leaf stoichiometry, Michelia wilsonii, ecological stoichiometry, soil organic carbon, microbial biomass, nutrient resorption, subtropical forest, phosphorus limitation, forest ecology, Plant and Soil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">202612</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
