<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>drought resistance &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/drought-resistance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 13:33:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Quinoa: The Salt-Loving Super Grain That Could Future-Proof Farming</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/quinoa-the-salt-loving-super-grain-that-could-future-proof-farming/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliet Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 13:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andes native plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change agricultural adaptation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRISPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epidermal bladder cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future-proof farming solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genomic selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Food Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[halophyte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[halophyte plant science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-protein gluten-free grains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritional benefits of quinoa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pangenome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preharvest sprouting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quinoa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quinoa crop resilience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salinity tolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salinity-affected soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salt-tolerant super grain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stress-resistant crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable crop development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waterlogging]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=238224</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new review in Stress Biology details how quinoa's extraordinary salt, drought, and cold tolerance, now backed by reference genomes, a pangenome, and gene-editing tools, positions the Andean halophyte as a model crop for feeding a warming, salinizing world.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As climate change pushes soils toward salinization and water supplies grow increasingly unpredictable, scientists are turning to one of the Andes&#8217; most remarkable gifts: quinoa. A comprehensive review published in Stress Biology by Heng Zhang of Shanghai Jiao Tong University and colleagues Guojun Feng and Yaozu Feng of the Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences maps out why this semi-domesticated halophyte has become the most closely watched stress-resistant crop in modern plant science, and what it will take to turn its natural toughness into a global agricultural asset. The review arrives at a moment when the pressures on the food system have never been sharper, with the world&#8217;s population projected to approach ten billion by 2050 and roughly 10.7 percent of global land already affected by salinity.</p>
<p>Quinoa&#8217;s credentials as a nutritional powerhouse are well established, but the review emphasizes that its agronomic versatility is equally striking. The seeds contain 12 to 23 percent protein, comparable to milk and superior to wheat, maize, and rice, and they deliver all essential amino acids, including lysine, methionine, and threonine, which are typically scarce in true cereals. The crop is naturally gluten-free, making it a lifeline for people with celiac disease, and its leaves, sprouts, and microgreens are emerging as novel plant foods in their own right, with dried quinoa leaves reaching protein levels of 37.7 percent, exceeding even spinach. Beyond human nutrition, the whole plant serves as green fodder or silage, and harvest residues feed livestock, making quinoa a genuinely multi-purpose crop.</p>
<p>The agronomic headline, however, is salt. Quinoa is a facultative halophyte, a rare classification among crops that means it can complete its entire life cycle at salinity levels up to 400 millimolar sodium chloride, equivalent to around 40 decisiemens per meter, conditions that would devastate wheat or rice. Remarkably, its growth is often optimal at moderate salinity of 100 to 200 millimolar NaCl, suggesting an inherent appetite for salt. Field trials in the United Arab Emirates demonstrated that quinoa produced seed yields between 0.7 and 1.05 tonnes per hectare using irrigation water at 14 to 15 decisiemens per meter, comparable to yields in non-saline traditional growing regions. Yet the tolerance has limits: one study identified a soil salinity threshold of roughly 12 decisiemens per meter above which seed yield declines rapidly, and germination remains a particularly sensitive stage.</p>
<p>At the heart of quinoa&#8217;s salt strategy lies one of plant biology&#8217;s most debated structures: the epidermal bladder cell. These balloon-like cells, which cloak the aerial surfaces of leaves, stems, and inflorescences, can reach volumes up to 1,000 times larger than ordinary epidermal cells. For decades they were regarded as salt glands, dumping toxic sodium and chloride ions away from metabolically active tissue. Supporting evidence came from experiments in which mechanically brushing off the bladder cells produced a salt-sensitive phenotype with increased sodium accumulation in the leaf lamina. Transcriptomic work identified key transporters, including the sodium-selective channel CqHKT1.2 and the anion transporter CqClC-c, proposed to load these ions into bladder vacuoles, with stalk cells acting as traffic controllers directing polar ion transport.</p>
<p>But the story has recently grown more complicated. Mutant quinoa lines that completely lack epidermal bladder cells show no loss of salt tolerance compared with wild-type plants, challenging the sequestration hypothesis. Instead, researchers have proposed that oxalic acid accumulated in the bladders deters arthropod herbivores. Intriguingly, multiple studies indicate that bladder cells accumulate potassium in quantities exceeding sodium even under saline conditions, and a recent study found epidermal bladder cells in some spinach varieties with potassium as the dominant ion. Knocking down a WD40 gene reduced bladder cell density and increased water loss, while removing stem bladder cells, but not leaf ones, reduced transpiration and growth. These findings point toward an evolutionarily conserved role in water management rather than a simple salt-dumping function, and the review makes clear that the debate is far from settled.</p>
<p>Whatever the bladder cells&#8217; exact role, quinoa&#8217;s osmotic strategy is well characterized. Unlike glycophytes that burn energy synthesizing organic osmolytes, quinoa preferentially uses inorganic ions as cheap osmotica, with an estimated 80 to 95 percent of leaf osmotic adjustment achieved through accumulation of sodium, potassium, and chloride. Toxic ions are sequestered into vacuoles by tonoplast antiporters driven by proton pumps, while tolerant genotypes excel at retaining potassium in the cytosol, maintaining the high cytosolic potassium-to-sodium ratio essential for enzymatic function. Organic solutes play supporting roles: proline acts as a reactive oxygen species scavenger and stabilizer of subcellular structures, betalain pigments in colored varieties protect the photosynthetic machinery from oxidative damage, and soluble sugars contribute to osmotic balance and stress signaling.</p>
<p>Drought tolerance follows a complementary logic. Quinoa behaves as an isohydric species, rapidly closing its stomata in response to water deficits to preserve leaf water potential, a response mediated by abscisic acid transported from roots to shoots. Although this closure restricts carbon dioxide uptake, quinoa maintains photosynthetic capacity even under severe water deficits, hinting at robust non-stomatal resilience. Root architecture adds another layer: genotypes from arid environments develop faster taproot elongation and longer, coarser root segments than their humid-environment counterparts, a phenotypic flexibility that lets the plant forage for deep soil moisture. The crop also tolerates frost down to roughly minus 8 degrees Celsius depending on developmental stage, using soluble sugars and proline as cryoprotectants and accumulating dehydrin proteins to shield seeds and embryos from desiccation and cold.</p>
<p>The review is candid about quinoa&#8217;s vulnerabilities, which matter enormously for its expansion beyond the Andes. Heat is the most serious threat: temperatures exceeding 32 to 35 degrees Celsius can slash yields by 31 to 85 percent depending on genotype and timing, and high temperatures reduce pollen viability by 30 to 80 percent, with the most sensitive window falling 8 to 10 days before flowering. Heat also alters seed composition, changing mineral concentrations of calcium, iron, and zinc in ways that persist after the stress ends. Waterlogging is equally damaging, reducing yields by more than 70 percent when it strikes during anthesis, and comparative studies suggest it is more detrimental than drought or salinity. Preharvest sprouting, driven by weak seed dormancy selected against during domestication, threatens harvests in increasingly erratic rainy seasons. Wild relatives such as Chenopodium berlandieri, which show superior yield stability and pollen viability under extreme heat, are now viewed as valuable resources for introgression breeding.</p>
<p>On the genomics front, the past decade has transformed quinoa from an orphan crop into a genetically well-resourced species. High-quality chromosome-scale reference genomes for the coastal Chilean accession QQ74 and the Real cultivar enabled the identification of TSARL1, a transcription factor whose mutation underlies saponin-free sweet quinoa, and revealed expansions of gene families involved in ion transport and abscisic acid homeostasis. An updated QQ74-V2 assembly placed 90.5 percent of the sequence on 18 chromosome-scale scaffolds and uncovered a 52-megabase pericentromeric inversion on chromosome 3B distinguishing coastal from highland ecotypes. A newly developed Chenopodium pangenome spanning 12 species and all eight known genome types shows that Gypsy retrotransposon expansion drives genome size differences and that roughly 65 percent of gene families in the genus are variable shell genes enriched for environmental adaptation. Functional tools have kept pace: the Apple latent spherical virus system for virus-induced gene silencing has confirmed the roles of sodium transporters CqHKT1 and CqSOS1, and a stable Agrobacterium-mediated floral culture transformation system now permits non-chimeric transgenic plants.</p>
<p>The path forward, the authors argue, lies in integrating these resources with modern breeding technologies. High-throughput phenomics using drones equipped with thermal and hyperspectral sensors can capture dynamic stress responses in the field, while artificial intelligence-driven genomic selection predicts breeding values for complex polygenic traits such as yield and stress tolerance. CRISPR/Cas9 editing, potentially delivered through transgene-free viral systems, could introduce targeted mutations for saponin reduction and heat tolerance, and speed breeding techniques that shorten generation times promise to compress cultivar development timelines dramatically. The review also flags institutional hurdles: quinoa&#8217;s absence from the Multilateral System of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources and the Nagoya Protocol&#8217;s restrictions hamper cross-border germplasm exchange, and researchers have proposed a Global Collaborative Network on Quinoa to standardize descriptors and phenotyping protocols. If these biological and institutional challenges can be met, the authors conclude, quinoa will serve not merely as a promising pseudo-cereal but as a vital model system for translating halophytic mechanisms into resilient cropping systems, turning the world&#8217;s degraded, salt-blighted soils into productive farmland.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Physiological mechanisms and genomic resources underlying abiotic stress resistance in quinoa</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Quinoa as a naturally stress-resistant crop: current status and future promises</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Zhang, H., Feng, G., &amp; Feng, Y. (2026). Quinoa as a naturally stress-resistant crop: current status and future promises. <em>Stress Biology, 6</em>(1), Article 12. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-025-00283-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-025-00283-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-025-00283-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44154-025-00283-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> quinoa, halophyte, salinity tolerance, drought resistance, epidermal bladder cells, pangenome, genomic selection, CRISPR, heat stress, waterlogging, preharvest sprouting, food security</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">238224</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Compound Drought-Heatwaves During Establishment Push Perennial Ryegrass Toward Total Dominance in Grassland Mixtures</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/compound-drought-heatwaves-during-establishment-push-perennial-ryegrass-toward-total-dominance-in-grassland-mixtures/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 22:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate extremes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compound drought effects on perennial ryegrass establishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compound drought-heatwave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drought-heatwave impact on young grassland diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecosystem services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of drought-heat events on grassland biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of drought-heatwaves on nitrogen fixation in grasslands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[establishment phase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grassland ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grassland management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gross primary production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of compound droughts on forage crop dominance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perennial ryegrass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resilience of mixed grassland swards during climate extremes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of climate extremes in grassland ecosystem stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[species dominance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability of diverse grassland mixtures under climate stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerability of grassland mixtures to establishment phase droughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white clover]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=232310</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A controlled experiment shows that compound drought-heatwave events striking during grassland establishment buffer biomass losses in mixtures while simultaneously driving perennial ryegrass dominance to as much as 97 percent of community biomass.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Managed grasslands cover some 3.37 billion hectares worldwide, roughly 70 percent of all agricultural land and about half of Europe&#8217;s farmland. For decades, the trend in these systems was simplification: dense stands of a single grass species, bred for uniform growth and maximum digestibility. In recent years, however, volatile fertiliser prices and rising sustainability demands have pushed farmers and researchers back toward diverse mixtures of grasses, legumes and forbs, which can deliver high yields at lower nitrogen inputs, improve forage quality and fix nitrogen biologically. A growing body of evidence also suggests that diverse swards buffer drought better than monocultures. But a new study raises a troubling caveat: that buffering may hinge on a narrow and vulnerable window, the establishment phase, and compound drought-heatwave events striking during this window can quietly dismantle the very diversity that makes mixtures valuable.</p>
<p>The research, published in the journal Plant and Soil, was led by Sophia Moracchioli Philadelphi of the University of Hohenheim in Germany, together with colleagues at Hohenheim and Aarhus University in Denmark. The team set out to answer a question that most drought experiments have sidestepped: what happens when a compound drought-heatwave, or CDHW, hits a young grassland community that is still assembling itself? Mature swards have been studied extensively, but during establishment the competitive hierarchies, root systems and canopies that underpin complementarity are still forming. Stress at this stage can leave lasting legacies for productivity, species composition and the ecosystem services a sward will deliver for years afterward.</p>
<p>To simulate a realistic western European summer extreme, the researchers ran a 112-day controlled growth-chamber experiment at Hohenheim. They grew mesocosms containing three functionally contrasting forage species: perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne), a fast-growing grass; white clover (Trifolium repens), a nitrogen-fixing legume; and chicory (Cichorium intybus), a deep-rooted non-leguminous forb. Each species was grown alone, and three mixture types were created: a binary grass-forb mixture and two three-species mixtures with either 33 or 67 percent legume. Climate profiles followed weekly averages recorded at Stuttgart Airport between 1991 and 2005, mimicking a typical regional growing season. For the first 90 days after sowing, all mesocosms were kept identical and well watered at 65 percent of field capacity.</p>
<p>Then came the stress. From day 91, a nine-day CDHW event was imposed in three of the chambers: irrigation was withheld to create an edaphic drought while air temperatures were raised by up to 8 degrees Celsius at the daily maximum and 3.4 degrees at the minimum, with relative humidity cut by 17 percent. The result was a doubling of the vapour pressure deficit, from about 1.1 to 2.21 kilopascals, a measure of how hard the atmosphere pulls water out of leaves. Dry soils suppress evapotranspiration and cloud formation, amplifying surface heating, which is precisely why drought and heat so often arrive together. The team tracked the consequences daily, measuring gross primary production, evapotranspiration, gravimetric soil water content and leaf water potential, then harvested all biomass at the end.</p>
<p>The physiological responses were strikingly species-specific. White clover proved the most resistant: its photosynthetic rate per unit of canopy area barely declined during stress and showed only weak coupling to soil moisture, evapotranspiration or leaf water status. Chicory took the opposite path, losing 24 percent of its normalised gross primary production during the event, the highest hydraulic sensitivity, but then staging the most dramatic recovery, rebounding to an average of 204 percent of control levels once water returned. Perennial ryegrass was the least resistant, its photosynthesis tracking soil drying closely, with reductions of roughly 37 to 47 percent in the grass monoculture and all mixtures. Leaf water potential, a direct indicator of plant hydraulic strain, diverged from control values within just two to four days of stress onset in all three species.</p>
<p>Yet here lay the study&#8217;s central paradox: this rich physiological diversity never scaled up to the community level. In mixtures, the photosynthetic trajectories closely followed those of the dominant ryegrass, regardless of whether the more resistant clover or the faster-recovering chicory were present. The authors point to the mass-ratio hypothesis, which holds that ecosystem functioning is governed primarily by the traits of the most abundant species. Because ryegrass already accounted for the bulk of the biomass, the physiological strengths of the subordinate species were simply underrepresented at the canopy scale, and no community-level physiological buffering could be detected.</p>
<p>The biomass data told a subtler story. Across all communities, the CDHW event cut aboveground shoot dry weight by about 20 percent, an estimated mean loss of 147 grams per square metre. All three monocultures ended with harvest ratios significantly below one relative to their controls, with chicory suffering the steepest decline at 41 percent, followed by clover at 28 percent and ryegrass at 20 percent. The mixtures, by contrast, all showed ratios that did not differ significantly from one, indicating greater biomass stability, exactly as the team&#8217;s first hypothesis predicted. Net diversity effects, the difference between observed mixture biomass and the sown-proportion-weighted expectation from monocultures, were positive in both climates and grew substantially under stress, rising on average by nearly 88 grams per square metre under CDHW.</p>
<p>But that stability came at a hidden cost. The diversity effects were non-transgressive: mixtures matched, but never exceeded, the best-performing monoculture, which was ryegrass itself. And beneath the stable totals, the community composition was being rewritten. Under control conditions, ryegrass already dominated the mixtures, contributing roughly 69 to 75 percent of shoot dry weight. Under CDHW, its share surged to 94 to 97 percent, a statistically significant reinforcement of grass dominance, while chicory and clover were squeezed down to minor fractions of 1 to 5 percent, though neither species was completely eliminated. Crucially, both subordinates experienced more negative leaf water potentials in mixtures than in their own monocultures during the stress, direct evidence that the dominant grass intensified their hydraulic stress through competition for belowground water.</p>
<p>The mechanism, the authors argue, is structural rather than physiological. Ryegrass entered the stress period with greater canopy development and finished with by far the largest root biomass, about 2,300 grams per square metre, significantly more than any other community. That early structural pre-emption, combined with rapid regrowth capacity, allowed it to convert the disturbance into a competitive legacy. Clover, despite its physiological resistance, lacked the structural reserves to capitalise on it, while chicory lost too much tissue during the event to recover its position. Rapid photosynthetic recovery after rewatering, the study shows, was simply not enough to restore biomass within the experiment&#8217;s timeframe, because shallow roots and limited carbon reserves constrained compensatory growth in these young swards.</p>
<p>The implications reach well beyond the growth chamber. A grassland mixture can hold its yield steady through a compound extreme and still lose the functional diversity that underpins biological nitrogen fixation, forage quality and long-term multifunctionality. If CDHW events, which are becoming a defining feature of western European summers, increasingly strike during establishment, farmers may end up with swards that look diverse on the seed label but function as near-monocultures in the field. The authors suggest that management strategies promoting balanced early establishment, such as optimised sowing rates and sowing timing, may be essential if mixtures are to deliver their promised benefits under climate change. Short-term biomass stability, this study makes clear, is no guarantee of compositional stability, and the most important battle for diversity in a grassland may be fought in its first few months of life.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effects of compound drought-heatwave events on species interactions and community assembly during grassland establishment</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Compound drought-heatwave events during establishment reinforce perennial ryegrass dominance in grassland mixtures</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Philadelphi, S. M., Berauer, B. J., Eriksen, J., Schweiger, A., Högy, P., &amp; Malisch, C. S. (2026). Compound drought-heatwave events during establishment reinforce perennial ryegrass dominance in grassland mixtures. <em>Plant and Soil</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09168-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09168-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09168-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11104-026-09168-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> grassland ecology, compound drought-heatwave, perennial ryegrass, white clover, chicory, plant diversity, drought resistance, gross primary production, species dominance, establishment phase, climate extremes, ecosystem services</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">232310</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Severe Drought Flips the Balance Between Resistance and Recovery in China&#8217;s Drylands</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/severe-drought-flips-the-balance-between-resistance-and-recovery-in-chinas-drylands/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gavin Prescott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 13:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aridity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon uptake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought resistance and post-drought recovery dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dryland vegetation resilience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drylands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological implications of increasing drought severity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of climate change on arid ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of severe drought on ecosystem stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implications for sustainable dryland management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net primary productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant community responses to drought stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-drought recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of drylands in global carbon cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPEI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Three-North Shelterbelt Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Three-North Shelterbelt Program ecological restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vegetation adaptation strategies in drylands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vegetation stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerability of water-limited landscapes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water scarcity in China's northern drylands]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=223042</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new satellite-based study of northern China's drylands shows that severe drought transforms the positive link between vegetation drought resistance and post-drought recovery into a tradeoff, with arid ecosystems becoming increasingly fragile as drought intensifies.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across the vast drylands of northern China, vegetation has long walked a delicate tightrope between surviving drought and bouncing back from it. A new study published in Forest Ecosystems suggests that this tightrope becomes far more precarious as droughts intensify, with severe water stress fundamentally reshaping the relationship between two of the most important traits governing ecosystem stability: drought resistance and post-drought recovery. The findings carry significant implications for the future of some of the world&#8217;s most water-limited landscapes, including the region covered by the Three-North Shelterbelt Program, the largest ecological restoration project on Earth.</p>
<p>Drylands occupy a special and vulnerable place in the global carbon cycle. Although they are defined by scarcity of water, they are extensive enough that their vegetation exerts considerable influence on terrestrial carbon uptake from year to year. Because their ecosystems sit close to physiological limits imposed by aridity, even modest shifts in precipitation and evaporative demand can ripple through plant communities, altering growth, survival, and the capacity of the land to store carbon. Under climate change, droughts in these regions are expected to become more frequent and more severe, making it essential to understand how dryland vegetation copes when water becomes scarce.</p>
<p>The research team focused on the drylands of northern China, a region that spans pronounced gradients of aridity and includes vast areas of restored and semi-natural vegetation. To track how plants responded to drought over more than two decades, the researchers turned to satellite observations covering the period from 2001 to 2022. Rather than relying on ground measurements alone, which are sparse across such an enormous territory, they used satellite-derived estimates of net primary productivity, or NPP, as an indicator of vegetation productivity and carbon uptake. NPP captures the amount of carbon that plants fix through photosynthesis and retain as growth, making it a widely used proxy for ecosystem health and function.</p>
<p>To characterize drought conditions, the team employed the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index, known as SPEI, which integrates both water supply through precipitation and atmospheric water demand through evapotranspiration. This index allowed the researchers to identify drought years of varying intensity across the study period. They combined the satellite productivity data with SPEI, land-cover classifications, and meteorological observations, then applied machine learning and statistical approaches to disentangle how vegetation behaved during drought years and in the years that followed.</p>
<p>At the heart of the analysis were two complementary abilities. The first is resistance, which describes how well vegetation maintains its productivity during drought years; a highly resistant ecosystem loses little carbon uptake even when water is scarce. The second is recovery, which reflects how quickly and completely vegetation regains its productivity once drought stress has passed. Together, these two traits determine whether an ecosystem&#8217;s carbon uptake remains stable over the long term, and ecologists have increasingly recognized that the balance between them may shift depending on the severity of the disturbance.</p>
<p>The study&#8217;s first major finding was encouraging: dryland vegetation with stronger resistance tended to show greater stability in carbon uptake over the long term. In other words, the ability to keep functioning during dry years is a cornerstone of stable ecosystem productivity in these water-limited environments. This result underscores why drought resistance has long been a central concern for ecologists and land managers working in arid regions, and it suggests that maintaining or enhancing resistance could help buffer dryland carbon cycling against the growing variability of the climate.</p>
<p>But the relationship between resistance and recovery proved to be far from fixed. Under moderate drought, the two traits moved in harmony: vegetation that resisted drought well also tended to recover well afterward. This positive association implies that, under less extreme water stress, the underlying physiological and structural attributes that help plants endure drought, such as deep roots or efficient water use, also position them to rebound quickly once conditions improve. Resistance and recovery, in this regime, are two faces of the same adaptive capacity.</p>
<p>Under severe drought, however, that harmony broke down. The positive relationship between resistance and recovery shifted into a tradeoff: vegetation that resisted drought better often recovered more slowly, while vegetation that rebounded faster tended to be less resistant during the drought years themselves. This reversal suggests that the strategies plants use to survive intense water stress may come at the cost of a slower return to full productivity, and vice versa. For ecosystems, such a tradeoff means that no single strategy guarantees stability, and that severe drought can expose vulnerabilities that moderate drought does not. Intriguingly, under extreme drought the tradeoff itself disappeared, which the researchers interpret as a sign that extreme water stress may disrupt the usual coordination between resistance and recovery altogether, potentially signaling increased vulnerability to drought across the system.</p>
<p>The study also revealed important differences across aridity zones. Arid ecosystems appeared more fragile as drought intensified, suggesting that the driest parts of the region have the least capacity to absorb escalating water stress. Semi-arid areas, by contrast, relied more heavily on recovery, meaning that their stability depends more on how quickly vegetation can regain productivity after drought than on how well it resists during the event. This distinction matters because it implies that the same drought can destabilize different landscapes through different mechanisms, and that assessments of ecosystem vulnerability must account for regional aridity rather than treating drylands as a uniform category.</p>
<p>The practical implications extend well beyond academic understanding. Because looking at only resistance or only recovery may miss important signs of vulnerability, the researchers argue that both abilities should be considered together when assessing the future of dryland ecosystems under climate change. For ecological restoration, the message is equally clear: strategies in water-limited regions should be matched to local drought conditions. Potential approaches include selecting drought-tolerant species, optimizing planting density to reduce competition for scarce soil water, improving soil moisture retention, and avoiding restoration schemes with excessive water demand. In a region that hosts the Three-North Shelterbelt Program, where decades of effort and enormous resources have been invested in reforesting and stabilizing dry landscapes, ensuring that restored vegetation can both withstand drought and recover from it may prove decisive for the long-term success of one of the planet&#8217;s most ambitious ecological experiments.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Drought resistance and recovery dynamics of dryland vegetation in northern China</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Severe drought disrupts the balance between vegetation’s resistance and recovery in dryland</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Severe drought disrupts the balance between vegetation’s resistance and recovery in dryland. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1146003" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> drylands, drought, vegetation stability, drought resistance, post-drought recovery, net primary productivity, SPEI, carbon uptake, northern China, Three-North Shelterbelt Program, aridity, ecological restoration</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">223042</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
