<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>drag-based model &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/drag-based-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 08:24:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>New hybrid model sharpens predictions of when solar eruptions will strike Earth</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/new-hybrid-model-sharpens-predictions-of-when-solar-eruptions-will-strike-earth/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Teresa Odom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 08:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constructing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coronal mass ejection propagation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coronal Mass Ejections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data-driven solar wind analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drag-based model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forecasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid physics-based machine learning model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid space weather prediction models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improving accuracy of solar eruption timing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine learning for solar event prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phy-XGBoost model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residual error correction in solar eruption prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar eruption prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar eruption transit time prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun-earth space weather forecasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transit time prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weighted generalized drag-based model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XGBoost]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=351176</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new hybrid model combining a physics-based drag model with XGBoost machine learning reduced average forecast errors for coronal mass ejection arrival times in testing.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> A team of researchers from Nanjing Normal University and the Chinese Academy of Sciences has now introduced Phy-XGBoost, a hybrid framework that combines a physics-based propagation model with machine learning to predict when these eruptions will arrive.</p>
<p> The researchers first extended this standard model into a Generalized Drag-Based Model, designed to explore potential differences in how fast and slow coronal mass ejections propagate. They then refined this generalized version into a weighted variant, which they call w-GDBM, that serves as the physical backbone of the new framework.</p>
<p>Because any physical model carries limitations, the team added a data-driven layer on top of the weighted model. XGBoost, a widely used machine learning algorithm, is trained to predict the residuals—the differences between the actual observed transit times and the times predicted by w-GDBM. The algorithm learns from features describing both the coronal mass ejection itself and the surrounding solar wind, allowing it to correct systematic errors that the physics model alone cannot capture.</p>
<p>The performance of the hybrid framework was tested across 800 random train-test splits of the data. Compared with the weighted Drag-Based Model alone, Phy-XGBoost reduced the average mean absolute error from 13.44 hours to 11.40 hours, and the average median absolute error from 11.14 hours to 8.79 hours. The researchers also compared their method with a purely data-driven XGBoost model that relied on the same features without a physical model underneath. The hybrid achieved a comparable average mean absolute error but a lower average median absolute error, suggesting that anchoring the machine learning correction in physics improves the reliability of typical predictions even when the average performance is similar.</p>
<p>The authors caution that these results, reported in their study accepted by Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, suggest the physics-guided machine learning framework is a promising approach to predicting coronal mass ejection arrival times rather than a finished operational forecasting system.  The physical model supplies a structured first estimate grounded in the dynamics of propagation, while the machine learning component learns where that estimate tends to go wrong and adjusts it using observed conditions. </p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> A hybrid physics-guided machine learning model for predicting the arrival times of coronal mass ejections</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Constructing a new hybrid model–Phy-XGBoost to predict the arrival time of coronal mass ejections</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Guan, F., Yang, Y., Xu, G., Yu, L., &amp; Shen, F. (2026). Constructing a new hybrid model–Phy-XGBoost to predict the arrival time of coronal mass ejections. <em>Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 13</em>, 1977142. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2026.1977142" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2026.1977142</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2026.1977142" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.3389/fspas.2026.1977142</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> coronal mass ejections, space weather, XGBoost, machine learning, drag-based model, solar physics, forecasting, solar wind, hybrid model, transit time prediction, Constructing, hybrid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">351176</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
