<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DMSO &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/dmso/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 19:28:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>New Method Strips Yeast Glucans to Reveal True Cellulose in Fermentation Samples</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/new-method-strips-yeast-glucans-to-reveal-true-cellulose-in-fermentation-samples/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Townsend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 19:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced analytical chemistry in biofuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytical chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biochemical analysis of grain fermentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biochemical characterization of fermentation intermediates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biomass conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cellulase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellulose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cellulose measurement in fermentation samples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellulose quantification in complex matrices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[challenges in polysaccharide differentiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMSO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethanol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grain fermentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of yeast cell walls on cellulose measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial ethanol fermentation analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new protocols for glucan isolation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novel sample preparation for industry-relevant biofuel samples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polysaccharide separation techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pullulanase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resistant starch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yeast beta-glucan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yeast glucan removal methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zymolyase]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=218538</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have developed a DMSO, pullulanase, and Zymolyase-based method that selectively removes yeast beta-glucan and resistant starch to accurately quantify cellulose in industrial grain fermentation samples.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Measuring cellulose sounds like it should be one of the straightforward tasks in analytical chemistry: take a sample, dissolve the interfering materials, and quantify what remains. In industrial grain fermentation, however, the reality is far messier. A fermentation intermediate drawn from a working ethanol plant is a dense slurry of partially digested grain, residual starch fragments, and enormous populations of yeast cells, all of which carry polysaccharides of their own. When analysts try to isolate and measure the small amount of cellulose that may be present in such a matrix, the signals from these other glucans can swamp or distort the result. A new study published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts by Justin Sluiter and Katie Michel of the National Laboratory of the Rockies, together with colleagues at Novonesis and POET, describes an analytical procedure designed to cut through that ambiguity and deliver a defensible number for cellulose content and conversion in mixed, industry-relevant samples.</p>
<p>The core problem the team set out to address lies in how cellulose has traditionally been separated from everything else in a sample. Conventional protocols rely on cold caustic extraction, in which a strong alkali solution is used to dissolve non-cellulosic glucans while leaving crystalline cellulose behind as a solid residue. That approach works reasonably well for clean biomass samples, but it carries a known risk: under cold caustic conditions, cellulose can undergo what chemists call mercerization, a transformation in which the crystalline structure of the polymer is altered and some of the material can be lost or converted into forms that no longer respond to the assay. For samples that contain only trace amounts of cellulose to begin with, such as grain fermentation intermediates, even a small systematic loss of this kind can translate into a large relative error, potentially masking the very conversion the process engineers are trying to detect.</p>
<p>To sidestep mercerization entirely, the researchers turned to dimethyl sulfoxide, or DMSO, as the solvent for removing the non-cellulosic carbohydrates. DMSO is a polar aprotic solvent with a long history in carbohydrate chemistry, and its key advantage here is that it can dissolve starch-derived glucans without exposing cellulose to the harsh alkaline conditions that drive structural change. Swapping caustic extraction for DMSO treatment protects the cellulose fraction from chemical modification, which means the measured residue is more likely to represent the cellulose that was genuinely present in the original sample rather than a partially degraded remnant of it. The trade-off, however, is that DMSO does not remove everything. Some resistant starch, the fraction of starch whose granular structure or chemical modification makes it stubbornly insoluble under ordinary conditions, can survive the DMSO step and contaminate the apparent cellulose measurement.</p>
<p>The solution to the resistant starch problem came from enzymology rather than solvent chemistry. The team employed a mixture of enzymes, including pullulanase, a debranching enzyme that cleaves the alpha-1,6 glycosidic linkages responsible for the branched architecture of starch molecules. By attacking these branch points, pullulanase renders resistant starch accessible to the other amylolytic enzymes in the mixture, allowing the residual starch to be hydrolyzed completely to glucose and washed away. This enzymatic cleanup step is what allows the DMSO-based protocol to achieve the selectivity that caustic extraction provided by brute chemical force, but without the collateral damage to cellulose. The combination of a gentler solvent and a targeted enzyme cocktail means that each class of interfering polysaccharide is removed by the mechanism best suited to it.</p>
<p>One more source of interference remained, and it is specific to fermentation samples: the yeast itself. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells that carry out industrial ethanol fermentation are encased in cell walls rich in beta-glucan, a glucose polymer that, despite its similar name and composition, is structurally unrelated to cellulose. In a fermentation intermediate, yeast beta-glucan can be present in quantities that dwarf the cellulose content of the grain, and any measurement that fails to distinguish between these two glucans will attribute the yeast-derived glucose to the cellulose fraction, inflating the result. The researchers solved this by incorporating Zymolyase, a commercially available enzyme preparation well known to microbiologists for its ability to digest yeast cell walls. Zymolyase selectively hydrolyzes yeast beta-glucan, dismantling the cell wall polysaccharide while leaving cellulose untouched, and thereby eliminating the single largest source of false attribution in these samples.</p>
<p>With all three components in place, DMSO to dissolve non-cellulosic glucans, pullulanase and its enzymatic partners to clear resistant starch, and Zymolyase to remove yeast beta-glucan, the protocol delivers a residue that can be confidently identified and quantified as cellulose. The performance of the method was assessed on samples with low cellulose content, which is precisely the regime where analytical precision matters most and where errors are hardest to avoid. The procedure demonstrated excellent reproducibility, with coefficients of variance of 7.14 percent or less. In practical terms, this means that repeated measurements of the same low-cellulose samples clustered tightly around their mean value, giving analysts and process engineers confidence that a change in the measured cellulose number reflects a real change in the process rather than noise in the assay.</p>
<p>Crucially, the method was not validated only on laboratory-prepared mixtures. The team tested it on samples relevant to both laboratory and full-scale plant operations, which is a meaningful distinction in the world of biofuel analytics. Industrial fermentation intermediates contain compounds, particulates, and microbial communities that are difficult to reproduce in a laboratory setting, and an assay that performs well on synthetic samples can still fail on the real thing. By demonstrating the procedure on authentic plant samples, the researchers provided evidence that the method holds up under the conditions where it will actually be used.</p>
<p>The most striking demonstration of the method&#8217;s discriminating power came from experiments in which cellulase, the enzyme cocktail that breaks cellulose down into fermentable glucose, was either added to or withheld from the process. When cellulase was included, the analysis showed an average of 0.9 percent of the ethanol in the final product derived from the conversion of cellulose. When no cellulase was added, the method returned a zero response, indicating no detectable cellulose-derived ethanol. This paired result is exactly what a correct assay should produce: a small but measurable signal when cellulose conversion is enzymatically enabled, and silence when it is not. It confirms that the protocol is not merely detecting glucose from starch or yeast glucan and mislabeling it as cellulose-derived, but is genuinely tracking the fate of the cellulose fraction through the fermentation.</p>
<p>For the biofuels industry, the significance of this work extends beyond a single laboratory technique. Grain-based ethanol plants are increasingly interested in understanding and quantifying every stream of carbohydrate flowing through their processes, both to maximize yield and to evaluate whether cellulosic conversion can be layered onto existing starch-based operations. If a plant adds cellulase to its process, it needs a reliable way to verify that the enzyme is actually converting cellulose to ethanol, and by how much. An assay that overstates cellulose conversion because it counts yeast beta-glucan or resistant starch as cellulose would lead to flawed economic decisions and misallocated engineering effort. Conversely, an assay that loses cellulose during sample preparation would understate conversion and could cause a viable process improvement to be abandoned. The DMSO, pullulanase, and Zymolyase approach gives the industry a measurement it can trust at the low concentrations where these questions are decided.</p>
<p>The study, which received support from the U.S. Department of Energy&#8217;s Office of Science and the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy&#8217;s Bioenergy Technologies Office, with nuclear magnetic resonance work performed at the University of Georgia&#8217;s Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, ultimately makes a simple but consequential claim: that a cellulose method built on DMSO, pullulanase, and commercially available Zymolyase provides a complete and accurate view of cellulose content, composition, and conversion in industrial fermentation processes. By replacing a lossy chemical extraction with a sequence of selective, well-characterized dissolution and enzymatic steps, the researchers have turned a persistent attribution problem into a solved one. For a field in which the difference between 0 and 0.9 percent cellulose-derived ethanol can determine whether a new process pathway is pursued, that kind of analytical clarity is not a technical nicety. It is the foundation on which the next generation of grain fermentation chemistry will be built.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Analytical quantification of cellulose in grain fermentation intermediates by selective removal of yeast glucans</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Improving cellulose attribution by selectively removing yeast glucans from grain fermentation intermediates</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Sluiter, J., Michel, K., Moxley, G., Gogerty, D., Plocher, B., &amp; Tille, M. (2026). Improving cellulose attribution by selectively removing yeast glucans from grain fermentation intermediates. <em>Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-026-02820-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-026-02820-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-026-02820-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s13068-026-02820-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> cellulose, yeast beta-glucan, Zymolyase, DMSO, pullulanase, resistant starch, grain fermentation, biofuels, ethanol, cellulase, analytical chemistry, biomass conversion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">218538</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists Unravel How Forever Chemical PFOA Breaks Down in Alkaline Solvent Mixtures</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/scientists-unravel-how-forever-chemical-pfoa-breaks-down-in-alkaline-solvent-mixtures/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 22:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alkaline solvent chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical decomposition of persistent pollutants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical pathways of fluorinated compounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defluorination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dimethyl sulfoxide water mixtures for pollutant breakdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMSO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electron transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental persistence of PFOA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental remediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental remediation of perfluorinated chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fluoride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fluorine atom release in PFOA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forever chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydroxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanistic study of PFOA destruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perfluorooctanoic acid degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFOA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFOA breakdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reaction kinetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redox chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redox mechanisms of forever chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sodium hydroxide in pollutant degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water treatment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=216729</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A French research team has mapped the stepwise redox mechanism by which PFOA loses its fluorine atoms in alkaline DMSO/water solutions, identifying the conditions that maximize destruction of the notorious forever chemical.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfluorooctanoic acid, better known as PFOA, has earned its place among the most notorious of the so-called forever chemicals. Its carbon-fluorine bonds are among the strongest in organic chemistry, which is precisely why the compound has persisted in soils, rivers, and drinking water supplies decades after its widespread use in non-stick coatings, water-repellent fabrics, and firefighting foams. Now, a team of French researchers led by Raphaël Tur of the French Geological Survey (BRGM), working with colleagues from Colas Environnement and the Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, has published a detailed kinetic and mechanistic study of how PFOA can be broken down in alkaline mixtures of dimethyl sulfoxide and water. The work, published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, offers one of the most granular pictures yet of the redox chemistry that governs the destruction of this stubborn pollutant.</p>
<p>The research team set out to answer a deceptively simple question: under what conditions, and through what sequence of electron-transfer events, does PFOA surrender its fluorine atoms as harmless fluoride ions? To do so, they subjected PFOA to alkaline dimethyl sulfoxide/water (DMSO/H2O) solutions under a range of carefully controlled conditions, varying the amount of sodium hydroxide, the proportion of water in the solvent blend, and the reaction temperature. The fate of PFOA and its degradation by-products was tracked using ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry, a technique sensitive enough to detect and relatively quantify the short-chain fluorinated fragments that appear as the long molecule is dismantled. Destruction efficiency, in turn, was measured by potentiometric fluoride detection with a fluoride-selective electrode, complemented by scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive spectroscopy to examine solid residues.</p>
<p>The central conceptual contribution of the study lies in how the authors frame the degradation chemistry. Rather than treating hydroxyl and hydrogen radicals as freely diffusing species that randomly attack PFOA molecules, the researchers describe the entire process through redox couples involving only the carbon atoms within PFOA and its by-products. In this framework, the hydroxyl radical paired with hydroxide (OH·/OH⁻) and the hydrogen radical paired with water (H·/H2O) act as transient redox intermediates associated with discrete electron-transfer events. The electron donor in the system is hydroxide, while the electron acceptors are molecular oxygen, PFOA itself, and water. This carbon-focused redox description allows the team to explain why certain reactions proceed readily while others stall, simply by examining the oxidation state of each carbon atom in the molecule.</p>
<p>A key insight emerging from this analysis is that the nucleophilic or electrophilic character of each redox reaction depends on the oxidation state of the carbon atom involved. Carbons bearing multiple fluorine atoms sit at high oxidation states and behave as electrophilic targets, while carbons that have been partially reduced become susceptible to different modes of attack. The most favorable degradation pathway identified by the team involves the stepwise oxidation of carbon driven solely by the OH·/OH⁻ redox couple. Through this repeated sequence, the molecule is progressively shortened, with each cycle eliminating one –CF2– unit from the chain in the form of two fluoride ions and one carbonate ion. In effect, the perfluorinated backbone is unzipped two fluorine atoms at a time, converting the once-inert fluorocarbon chain into benign inorganic products.</p>
<p>The study also reveals that degradation is not purely an oxidative affair. The OH·/OH⁻ and H·/H2O redox couples together mediate secondary electron-transfer pathways in which two different carbon atoms within the same PFOA-derived molecule are simultaneously oxidized and reduced. This coupled oxidation-reduction within a single molecule helps explain the variety of by-products observed chromatographically, including shorter-chain perfluorinated species that retain some of their fluorine content. Understanding these parallel pathways matters for remediation engineering, because incomplete mineralization can leave behind shorter perfluorinated acids that are themselves persistent and, in some cases, more mobile in groundwater than the parent compound.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most practically important finding concerns the role of water. Although water is a participant in the redox chemistry, the researchers found that both the initial water content of the solvent mixture and the water continuously formed during the reactions actually limit the destruction process. The mechanism is subtle: water enhances the solvation of hydroxide ions, and a heavily solvated hydroxide is a weaker electron donor. Because the oxidizing capacity of the OH·/OH⁻ redox couple depends on the availability of unsolvated, reactive hydroxide, excess water effectively throttles the reaction. This finding provides a clear chemical rationale for why DMSO-rich mixtures outperform more aqueous media, and it suggests that managing water activity will be essential in any attempt to scale the chemistry beyond the laboratory bench.</p>
<p>The kinetic data translate into a straightforward recipe for maximizing defluorination. The higher the molar ratio of sodium hydroxide to PFOA, at 62:1 or greater, the lower the water content, with DMSO/H2O volume ratios of at least 3.87:1, and the higher the temperature, at 120 °C or above, the greater the extent of defluorination achieved. Each of these parameters pushes the chemistry in the same direction: abundant hydroxide supplies the electron donor that fuels the redox chain, a DMSO-rich environment keeps hydroxide minimally solvated and maximally reactive, and elevated temperature accelerates the electron-transfer steps that cleave the carbon-fluorine bonds. The conditions are demanding, but they remain far milder than the incineration temperatures, often exceeding 1000 °C, required to destroy PFAS thermally.</p>
<p>The significance of this work is best appreciated against the backdrop of the broader PFAS remediation challenge. Thousands of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances are in commercial use, and their chemical inertness, which made them so valuable in industry, renders them essentially immune to conventional water treatment. Adsorption onto activated carbon or ion-exchange resins merely concentrates the problem rather than solving it, transferring the chemicals from water to a spent sorbent that still requires destruction. Advanced oxidation processes, which have proven effective against many organic pollutants, often fail against fully fluorinated compounds because hydroxyl radicals preferentially attack electron-rich moieties that perfluorinated chains simply do not possess. Reductive approaches using hydrated electrons have shown promise, but they too face structural and practical constraints. Chemical destruction in solvent systems, exemplified by the low-temperature mineralization of perfluorocarboxylic acids reported in Science in 2022, has emerged as one of the most exciting frontiers in the field.</p>
<p>The new study adds mechanistic depth to this frontier by explicitly mapping the electron-transfer choreography that underlies solvent-phase destruction. Prior work in alkaline DMSO systems had established that hydroxide can act as a one-electron reducing agent in aprotic solvents, generating superoxide and other reactive intermediates, and that DMSO itself participates in the radical chemistry of such mixtures. What the French team contributes is a unified, carbon-centered accounting of where electrons flow during PFOA degradation, showing that the apparent complexity of the product distribution can be rationalized by the oxidation states of individual carbon atoms and the redox couples that address them. This level of mechanistic resolution is precisely what engineers need to design reactors that push reactions down the most productive pathways while suppressing the side reactions that generate problematic intermediates.</p>
<p>Challenges remain before such chemistry can treat real-world contamination. The solvent volumes, hydroxide loadings, and temperatures required are substantial, and contaminated environmental matrices introduce water, dissolved oxygen, co-contaminants, and sorbed phases that the pristine laboratory solutions do not contain. The research was conducted under the European Union&#8217;s Horizon 2020 PROMISCES project, which targets the monitoring and elimination of emerging contaminants in soil and water, suggesting that the authors view the work as a step toward applied solutions rather than pure curiosity. Even so, the study&#8217;s message is ultimately an optimistic one: the carbon-fluorine bond, long considered an insurmountable barrier, yields predictably to a well-understood sequence of electron transfers when the solvent environment is engineered to keep hydroxide in its most reactive form. For a class of pollutants whose very name, forever chemicals, encodes despair, that predictability is a genuinely hopeful development, turning the destruction of PFOA from an empirical art into a science that can be rationally optimized.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Chemical defluorination kinetics and redox mechanisms of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in alkaline dimethyl sulfoxide/water solutions</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Defluorination of perfluorooctanoic acid in alkaline dimethyl sulfoxide/water solutions: kinetics and carbon-focused redox mechanism insights</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Tur, R., Betelu, S., Colombano, S., Davarzani, D., Bristeau, S., Grandclément, J., Perrault, A., Lions, J., van Hullebusch, E. D., &amp; Ignatiadis, I. (2026). Defluorination of perfluorooctanoic acid in alkaline dimethyl sulfoxide/water solutions: kinetics and carbon-focused redox mechanism insights. <em>Environmental Science and Pollution Research</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38216-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38216-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38216-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11356-026-38216-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> PFOA, PFAS, forever chemicals, defluorination, DMSO, redox chemistry, hydroxide, electron transfer, water treatment, environmental remediation, reaction kinetics, fluoride</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">216729</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
