The defining trick of a high entropy alloy lies in its name. Where a conventional alloy is dominated by a single base metal doped with trace additions, an HEA dissolves five or more elements at concentrations of roughly 5 to 35 atomic percent, typically with atomic radii differing by less than 15 percent. The authors note that the field has converged on a second, thermodynamic definition as well: a genuine HEA must possess a configurational entropy of at least 1.5R, where R is the gas constant, meaning the sheer number of possible atomic arrangements is large enough to stabilise simple solid solution phases instead of brittle intermetallic compounds. The result is a material whose structure and properties can be tuned not by tweaking a trace element but by redesigning the entire elemental recipe.

The review organises the field around four so-called core effects, first outlined by Jien-Wei Yeh and completed by S. Ranganathan in 2003. The high entropy effect favours stable, disordered solid solutions; sluggish diffusion slows the rate at which atoms move and phases transform; severe lattice distortion arises because every atom is surrounded by neighbours of different sizes, straining the crystal; and the cocktail effect captures the surprising composite behaviours that emerge when many elements interact at once. Crucially, each of these effects has a direct electromagnetic consequence. Lattice distortion bends electronic energy bands, splits energy levels and creates localised states between the valence and conduction bands, modulating conductivity and dielectric response in ways conventional alloys cannot easily replicate.

That structural disorder translates into an unusually rich toolbox of electromagnetic loss mechanisms. When a microwave strikes an HEA, energy is dissipated through electronic polarisation, as electron clouds shift against their nuclei in the local electric fields created by chemically distinct atoms; through interfacial polarisation, as charges pile up at grain and phase boundaries; through magnetic loss, as magnetic domains in ferromagnetic alloys containing iron, cobalt, nickel or manganese respond and resonate; and through conductive loss, as free electrons oscillate and convert wave energy into heat via Ohmic heating. The challenge, the authors stress, is balance: too much conductivity turns an absorber into a mirror, and a large mismatch between the material’s impedance and that of free space causes most of the wave to reflect away before it can be absorbed.

Impedance matching is therefore the central design problem, and here HEAs offer unusual flexibility. Because complex permittivity and complex permeability can both be adjusted through composition, HEAs can be engineered to bring the material impedance closer to that of ambient space, minimising the reflection coefficient while maximising the attenuation constant that governs how quickly the wave’s amplitude decays inside the absorber. The quantitative payoff is striking. Reported reflection losses for HEA-based materials span from about minus 10 decibels, the threshold below which 90 percent of incident power is absorbed, down to roughly minus 70 decibels, depending on composition, thickness and frequency. The reviewed literature includes an FeCoNiMnCu0.5 alloy with a reflection loss of minus 71.0 decibels at 6.79 gigahertz from a layer just 2.93 millimetres thick, and boron-doped FeCoNiCr alloys reaching minus 62.5 decibels at 2.11 millimetres.

Getting there, however, takes careful processing. Because pure HEAs tend to be strongly metallic and conductive, the review describes several engineering strategies for taming them. Mechanical alloying, particularly high-energy ball milling, flattens spherical particles into high aspect ratio flakes that promote multiple polarisation events and tune the complex electromagnetic parameters. Annealing then sharpens crystallinity and boosts saturation magnetisation: FeCoNiAlCr0.9 powders improved from minus 26.88 to minus 47.55 decibels after heat treatment, while FeCoNiMn0.5Al0.2 annealed at 500 degrees Celsius delivered minus 44.425 decibels over a 3.825 gigahertz bandwidth. Surface modifications do impressive work too. Phosphating FeCoNiMn flakes produced a protective layer that lifted performance to minus 62.4 decibels at 10.7 gigahertz while adding corrosion and oxidation resistance, and dealloying, which leaches aluminium out of FeCoNiCuAl surfaces, enhanced impedance matching and pushed losses past minus 56 decibels at two separate frequencies.

Doping and compositing broaden the palette further. Adding small amounts of non-metals such as carbon, nitrogen or boron introduces ionic character and dipole oscillations that feed dielectric loss; boron-doped FeCoNiCr alloys achieved a maximum bandwidth of 5.78 gigahertz while retaining mechanical strength and oxidation resistance. Encapsulating HEA nanoparticles in graphitic carbon shells, via routes from arc discharge in methane to metal-organic chemical vapour deposition, simultaneously improves impedance matching and reduces radar cross-section, with one carbon-coated FeCoNiCuMn composite reaching minus 65.8 decibels and an absorption width of 7.68 gigahertz. Pairing HEAs with polymers, oxides or ceramics blends the alloy’s magnetic loss and structural stability with the partner phase’s dielectric loss, as in FeNiCrMn-polylactic acid composites printable by fused deposition modelling, and FeCoNi(Si0.6Al0.2B0.2) powders embedded in paraffin, which the review singles out as among the most versatile performers, combining thin 1.2 to 2.0 millimetre layers with reflection losses down to minus 44.1 decibels in the X and Ku bands.

Measuring all this in a way that matters outside the laboratory is its own discipline, and the review devotes detailed attention to it. Vector network analysers paired with horn antennas measure scattering parameters such as S11 and S21 in free-space fixtures, from which shielding effectiveness and reflection loss are derived; HEA-reinforced carbon fibre composites tested this way achieved total shielding of about 45.9 decibels at 4 gigahertz. Open area test sites, with calibrated ground planes and antennas separated by 3 to 30 metres, serve compliance testing of large enclosures, while indoor anechoic chambers lined with pyramidal absorbers provide reflection-free environments for monostatic and bistatic radar cross-section measurements across controlled angles, polarisations and frequency sweeps. The review reports HEA composite radar cross-section reductions of roughly 10 to 30 decibels in chamber tests, and notes that such measurements bridge laboratory-grade shielding data and real-world electromagnetic detectability.

Obstacles remain before these alloys fly on actual aircraft. The authors highlight the absence of standardised testing protocols across frequency bands and environments, which makes comparing studies difficult; edge effects and sample size limits that hamper scaling VNA results to full components; interfacial stability and oxidation concerns when HEAs are coupled with polymers; and early-stage cost and manufacturability. Even the frequency coverage is lopsided: most HEA research targets the C and X bands central to military radar and communications, leaving S-band and Ku-band coverage comparatively underexplored. The review calls for quantitative assessment of absorption mechanisms, a firmer physical understanding of lattice distortion, scalable synthesis, multi-scale modelling and durability testing under extreme conditions as the priorities that will determine whether laboratory spectacles become fielded technologies.

The most transformative possibility, the authors argue, lies in merging HEA chemistry with additive manufacturing. Because 3D printing can control composition, microstructure and geometry simultaneously, it promises lightweight graded structures whose electromagnetic response is designed in from the melt, capable of surviving high temperatures and corrosive atmospheres while retaining their absorption performance. From stealth platforms and radar-visible UAV signatures to telecommunications, energy storage and even healthcare electronics, the combination of chaotic multielement chemistry and precision manufacturing offers something conventional absorbers cannot: a single material family whose dielectric and magnetic personalities can be tuned almost at will. If the remaining manufacturing and standardisation hurdles fall, the alloys once prized mainly for their strength and heat resistance may quietly become the invisible backbone of an electromagnetically cleaner, harder-to-detect world.

Subject of Research: High entropy alloys as electromagnetic wave absorbing materials for stealth and shielding applications

Article Title: A review on high entropy alloys as an absorber of electromagnetic radiation

Article References: Gowda, N. R., Setupathy, A., Raj, A. A. B., & Thangaraju, S. (2026). A review on high entropy alloys as an absorber of electromagnetic radiation. Journal of Materials Science: Metallurgy, 1(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44492-026-00006-0

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1007/s44492-026-00006-0

Keywords: high entropy alloys, electromagnetic wave absorption, stealth technology, radar cross section, impedance matching, magnetic loss, dielectric loss, radar absorbing materials, electromagnetic interference shielding, mechanical alloying, additive manufacturing, lattice distortion

The core of the innovation lies in the filler itself, a three-component architecture the researchers call poly(Ani-co-Cz)@GO-Fe₃O₄. Graphene oxide, a two-dimensional carbon sheet decorated with oxygen-containing groups, serves as the structural backbone. Iron oxide nanoparticles, Fe₃O₄, contribute magnetism, while a copolymer of aniline and carbazole is grown onto the surface, providing the conjugated, electron-delocalized pathways that make the material electrically conductive. Aniline-based polyaniline is one of the most studied conducting polymers, prized for its stability and tunable conductivity, but it can be brittle and difficult to process. Carbazole, a fused-ring aromatic unit, brings additional rigidity, thermal robustness, and photoelectronic functionality. Co-polymerizing the two monomers onto graphene oxide yields a hybrid in which each component compensates for the weaknesses of the others, and the magnetic particles anchor a functionality that pure carbon fillers cannot supply.

To confirm that the hybrid really formed as designed, the team subjected the material to an extensive battery of characterization techniques. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy tracked the chemical bonds and surface chemistry, verifying that the copolymer had grafted onto the graphene oxide and that the iron oxide phase was present. Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction probed the electronic structure and crystallinity, while scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray analysis, and atomic force microscopy mapped the morphology and confirmed that the nanocomposite dispersed uniformly through the silicone rather than clumping into conductive islands. Vibrating sample magnetometry delivered perhaps the most striking result: the filled films exhibited superparamagnetic behavior, meaning they magnetize strongly in an external field but lose their magnetization when the field is removed, exactly the property needed for devices that must not retain magnetic memory or stick to one another.

Uniform dispersion is the make-or-break variable in polymer nanocomposites, and here the chemistry worked in the researchers’ favor. Hydrogen bonding between the oxygen groups on graphene oxide, the amine and imine sites along the copolymer backbone, and the siloxane network of PDMS creates strong interfacial interactions that restrain the mobility of neighboring polymer chains. Those interactions show up clearly in the mechanical tests. As nanocomposite loading increased, both tensile strength and tensile modulus rose significantly, transforming a soft, nearly featureless elastomer into a film that resists deformation and carries load. The trade-off is a reduction in flexibility, a familiar dilemma in composite design, though the authors report that the films retain useful elastomeric character, particularly at moderate filler contents, making them compatible with bendable and wearable form factors.

Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis added another layer of insight, revealing that the viscoelastic behavior of the films can be tuned by adjusting the filler loading. The glass transition temperature of the silicone shifted as the nanocomposite content changed, a direct consequence of the hydrogen-bonding network tethering polymer segments to filler surfaces and altering how segments relax under thermal agitation. In practical terms, this means an engineer could dial in not only the electrical and magnetic properties of a film but also its damping and thermal-mechanical response, an attractive degree of freedom for protective coatings that must survive vibration, flexing, and temperature swings in communication hardware.

The headline application, electromagnetic interference shielding, was evaluated across the X-band from 8 to 12.4 gigahertz, the frequency range used by radar, satellite links, and many wireless systems. The measurements showed that both direct-current and alternating-current conductivity of the films increased with nanocomposite loading, as expected when more conductive pathways thread through the insulating silicone. Shielding performance likewise climbed with loading, reaching a maximum shielding effectiveness of 1.2 decibels at 40 weight percent filler. That figure is modest compared with dense metal shields or high-loading carbon composites, but the significance lies in the mechanism and the multifunctionality: the films achieve shielding while remaining thin, elastomeric, and magnetically responsive, attributes that conventional metallic enclosures cannot match.

Dissecting the shielding mechanism revealed a synergistic interplay between reflection and absorption. Incoming electromagnetic waves are first partially reflected at impedance mismatches at the film surface, while the portion that penetrates is attenuated inside the material through dielectric losses, driven by interfacial polarization and conduction along the copolymer-graphene network, and through magnetic losses from the iron oxide phase. Notably, the analysis showed that dielectric loss dominates over magnetic loss in these films, indicating that the conductive copolymer and graphene oxide components do the heavy lifting in converting wave energy into heat, while the magnetic particles primarily add magnetic responsiveness and complementary attenuation pathways. This kind of mechanistic understanding is essential for rational design, because it tells future researchers which component to optimize when higher shielding is needed.

The broader context makes clear why multifunctionality matters. Most shielding research to date has focused on single-objective materials: carbon nanotube networks for conductivity, MXene films for ultrahigh absorption, or ferrite powders for magnetic loss. Each approach typically sacrifices something else, whether it is mechanical flexibility, processability, weight, or cost. By covalently and noncovalently integrating a conducting copolymer, graphene oxide, and superparamagnetic iron oxide into one filler, and then embedding that filler in a medically benign, optically transparent elastomer, the Mazandaran team has produced a platform in which shielding, mechanical reinforcement, electrical conduction, and magnetic function coexist in a single film. The authors highlight potential uses in flexible electronics, wearable electromagnetic shielding garments, and advanced protective coatings for communication devices.

The work also illustrates the pragmatic realities of translating laboratory nanocomposites into products. A shielding effectiveness of 1.2 decibels corresponds to attenuating roughly a quarter of the incident power, sufficient for reducing interference in low-to-moderate exposure scenarios but well below the 20 decibels or more demanded by military and high-power applications. Nonetheless, the loading-dependent trends in conductivity, modulus, and viscoelasticity provide a clear roadmap: optimizing percolation pathways, reducing the filler content needed for a given conductivity, or structuring the film with segregated or layered architectures could push performance substantially higher without sacrificing the flexibility that makes PDMS attractive in the first place. The fact that the researchers received no external funding for the study underscores the accessibility of the synthesis route, which relies on well-established polymerization and co-precipitation chemistry.

As the electromagnetic spectrum grows ever more crowded and flexible, skin-conformal electronics move from concept to clinic, materials that can do several jobs at once will increasingly define the state of the art. The PDMS films described here are not the final word on multifunctional shielding, but they demonstrate a compelling design principle: build the conductivity, magnetism, and mechanical reinforcement into a single nanoscale hybrid, and let strong interfacial chemistry knit it into an elastic matrix. If subsequent work can amplify the absorption component and trim the loading required, the same strategy could yield the thin, stretchable, magnetically addressable shields that the next generation of wearables, implants, and communication devices will need to operate cleanly in a noisy wireless world.

Subject of Research: Multifunctional PDMS nanocomposite films containing a poly(aniline-co-carbazole)@graphene oxide-Fe₃O₄ hybrid for electromagnetic interference shielding, mechanical reinforcement, and magnetic functionality.

Article Title: High performance PDMS nanocomposite films with poly(Ani-co-Cz)@GO–Fe₃O₄ toward enhanced EMI shielding, mechanical integrity, and magnetic functionality

Article References: Fallah, M., Lakouraj, M. M., & Norouzian, R.-S. (2026). High performance PDMS nanocomposite films with poly(Ani-co-Cz)@GO–Fe₃O₄ toward enhanced EMI shielding, mechanical integrity, and magnetic functionality. Polymer Bulletin, 83(11), Article 631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-026-06684-z

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1007/s00289-026-06684-z

Keywords: PDMS nanocomposite, EMI shielding, graphene oxide, Fe3O4 nanoparticles, polyaniline, polycarbazole, superparamagnetism, flexible electronics, X-band, dielectric loss, mechanical reinforcement, wearable devices