<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>desiccant &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/desiccant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 19:00:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Simple Bed Materials and Humid Coastal Air Drive Water Harvesting in Solar Desiccant Systems, Study Finds</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/simple-bed-materials-and-humid-coastal-air-drive-water-harvesting-in-solar-desiccant-systems-study-finds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 19:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atmospheric water harvesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bed material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calcium chloride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calcium chloride hygroscopic salt in water harvesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coastal climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desiccant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desiccant-based solar water extraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experimental study on atmospheric water collection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[factors affecting water yield in solar desiccant systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humid coastal air water harvesting techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of ambient humidity on water harvesting efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of bed materials in atmospheric water collection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pareto analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable freshwater generation from humid air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar collector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar desiccant system for freshwater production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar thermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar-driven atmospheric moisture condensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable water resources in arid and coastal regions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taguchi experimental design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water resources management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water scarcity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=201424</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A systematic experimental study identifies bed material and ambient climate as the dominant factors controlling water yield in a solar collector and calcium chloride desiccant system, achieving about 0.87 liters per day per square meter under humid coastal conditions.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every day, the atmosphere carries an almost unimaginable volume of water—an estimated tens of thousands of cubic kilometers at any given moment—distributed as vapor across climates from arid deserts to humid coastlines. For regions where groundwater is depleted and surface water is scarce, that airborne reservoir represents a tantalizing resource. Atmospheric water harvesting, or AWH, seeks to tap it directly by extracting moisture from ambient air and condensing it into usable freshwater. Now, a study published in Water Resources Management offers a rigorously controlled, experimentally grounded answer to a deceptively simple question: which factors actually matter most when you try to pull drinking water out of thin air with nothing but sunshine, a desiccant, and a modest solar collector?</p>
<p>Researchers Ali Fayaz and Elshan Soltani of the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Islamic Azad University in Takestan, Iran, designed a systematic parametric study around a desiccant-based solar collector system. Their setup pairs a flat solar collector with a host bed impregnated with calcium chloride (CaCl₂), a hygroscopic salt solution that absorbs water vapor from the surrounding air. During the day, the desiccant-loaded bed soaks up atmospheric moisture; as solar radiation heats the collector, the absorbed water is regenerated and released as vapor, which then condenses and is collected as liquid water. The elegance of the approach lies in its simplicity: no compressors, no refrigerants, no grid electricity—only a passive material doing chemistry with the sky.</p>
<p>What sets this study apart from many earlier efforts is its use of the Taguchi experimental design, a statistical framework widely used in engineering to evaluate multiple factors efficiently with a limited number of experimental runs. Implemented in Minitab, the Taguchi approach allowed the researchers to vary seven parameters simultaneously—relative humidity, CaCl₂ desiccant concentration, bed material, solar collector inclination, bed height, ambient temperature, and operating time—without needing to run every possible combination in isolation. The harvested-water yield served as the response variable, and the relative importance of each factor was quantified through Pareto analysis, a statistical technique that ranks contributions by the magnitude of their effect.</p>
<p>The desiccant concentrations tested spanned 40, 60, and 80 percent CaCl₂, while the bed materials included four distinct candidates: sawdust, a wool blanket, cotton fabric, and a polyurethane sponge. These materials serve as porous host beds that hold the liquid desiccant and present a large wetted surface area to the ambient air. Collector inclination angles were varied to explore how solar capture geometry influences regeneration, and bed height—the vertical distance between the desiccant bed and the underside of the collector glass—was adjusted to probe its effect on heat transfer and vapor release. Experiments were conducted under contrasting climatic conditions, including a humid coastal setting in Tonekabon and a drier inland site at Qazvin, allowing the researchers to evaluate how climate shapes system performance.</p>
<p>The Pareto analysis delivered a clear and somewhat surprising hierarchy. The bed material emerged as the single most influential factor governing water yield, outranking every environmental and geometric variable tested. Ambient temperature ranked second, followed by desiccant concentration and relative humidity. By contrast, collector inclination, operating time, and bed height had comparatively modest effects on the outcome. This ranking carries real engineering significance: it suggests that designers of solar desiccant water harvesters should prioritize material selection and thermal environment over fine-tuning the collector&#8217;s tilt or the depth of the desiccant bed. In other words, the choice of what you put in the tray matters more than how you angle the glass above it.</p>
<p>The performance of the wool blanket as a host bed proved particularly noteworthy. Under the investigated conditions, the combination of humid coastal air and a wool blanket bed was associated with the highest water harvesting results. This outcome is consistent with the material&#8217;s fiber structure, which can retain substantial quantities of CaCl₂ solution while maintaining capillary pathways for vapor transport, though the study&#8217;s authors frame the result empirically rather than attributing it to any single mechanism. The finding also hints at a broader design philosophy for low-cost water harvesting in developing regions: everyday textiles, rather than exotic engineered sorbents, may offer competitive performance when paired with the right desiccant and climate.</p>
<p>In quantitative terms, the system&#8217;s best daily performance reached a cumulative yield of 314 milliliters of water from the 0.36-square-meter collector area—equivalent to approximately 0.87 liters per day per square meter of collector. This normalized productivity figure gives the work immediate practical relevance, providing a benchmark against which other solar desiccant systems reported in the literature can be compared. The authors are careful to note that such comparisons are inherently approximate, since reported yields depend strongly on local climatic conditions, seasonal variation, and operating protocols that differ from study to study. Even so, the figure places this simple, passive configuration within the range of performance reported for considerably more complex solar-driven atmospheric water generation systems.</p>
<p>Beyond the ranking of individual factors, the study examined how parameters interact through two-dimensional contour plots and combined response plots, revealing that the effects of the variables are not purely additive. The interplay between ambient temperature and desiccant concentration, for example, illustrates a fundamental thermodynamic tension: higher temperatures accelerate the regeneration and release of absorbed water, but they also shift the vapor pressure equilibrium in ways that can influence how much moisture the desiccant can retain during the absorption phase. Mapping these combined effects experimentally provides a data-driven foundation for predicting water yield across a range of operating scenarios, effectively turning the experimental matrix into a predictive tool for system designers.</p>
<p>The full experimental dataset—including operating conditions, hourly and cumulative water yields for both the Tonekabon and Qazvin experiments, and identified bed materials—is published as an appendix and made available in machine-readable format as supplementary material. This commitment to data transparency positions the study as a reusable resource for the growing community of researchers working on atmospheric water harvesting, including those applying machine learning and optimization algorithms to the same class of systems. Related work from the same research group has explored neural networks and evolutionary algorithms for optimizing desiccant-driven water production, and an open experimental dataset of this kind provides exactly the ground truth that such computational approaches require.</p>
<p>The broader context makes the work timely. With global freshwater demand rising and roughly two billion people lacking access to safely managed drinking water, technologies that produce water from air using renewable energy have attracted intense scientific attention, from metal-organic framework sorbents to desiccant-coated heat exchangers. Thermodynamic analyses have established that the theoretical limits of atmospheric water harvesting depend critically on ambient humidity and temperature, meaning that practical systems must be matched to the climates they serve. The new study&#8217;s demonstration that material choice and climate dominate the parameter space—while geometric refinements matter less—offers a pragmatic simplification. For communities on humid coastlines where sunlight is abundant and infrastructure is limited, a wool blanket, a salt solution, and a sloped pane of glass may one day translate directly into a reliable daily ration of drinking water, harvested one sunlit cycle at a time.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Experimental parametric study of atmospheric water harvesting using a solar collector and calcium chloride desiccant system</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> An Experimental and Combined Parametric Study on Predicting Atmospheric Water Harvesting in a Solar Collector and Desiccant-Based System</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Fayaz, A., &amp; Soltani, E. (2026). An Experimental and Combined Parametric Study on Predicting Atmospheric Water Harvesting in a Solar Collector and Desiccant-Based System. <em>Water Resources Management, 40</em>(12), Article 526. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-026-04885-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-026-04885-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-026-04885-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11269-026-04885-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> atmospheric water harvesting, desiccant, solar collector, calcium chloride, Taguchi experimental design, water scarcity, Pareto analysis, renewable energy, bed material, coastal climate, water resources management, solar thermal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">201424</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kaolin Recipe Tweak Controls the Water-Trapping Power of Silica Gel</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/kaolin-recipe-tweak-controls-the-water-trapping-power-of-silica-gel/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 11:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amorphous silica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applications of silica gel in electronics and pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameroon kaolin clay for industrial chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desiccant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effect of metakaolin stirring on silica architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydroxysodalite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of kaolin to sodium hydroxide ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaolin-based silica gel synthesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaolinite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layered silicate structure of kaolinite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-cost tuning of silica gel porosity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[materials chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metakaolin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moisture absorption in desiccants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimizing desiccant performance through recipe modification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of hydroxyl groups in moisture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silica gel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sodium hydroxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sol-gel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable methods for silica gel production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water-trapping properties of silica gel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X-ray diffraction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=193870</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By varying the amount of metakaolin dissolved in sodium hydroxide, researchers can tune silica gel's chain length and hydroxyl content to control its moisture-trapping capacity.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Researchers in Cameroon have shown that a deceptively simple change in a well-known chemistry recipe—how much metakaolin powder is stirred into a fixed volume of sodium hydroxide solution—can dramatically reshape the internal architecture of the silica gel that emerges at the end. The finding, published as an open-access study in Discover Industrial Chemistry and Materials, matters because silica gel is one of the world&#8217;s workhorse desiccants: the porous, moisture-hungry material tucked into electronics packaging, pharmaceutical bottles and food containers. If the ratio of clay to alkali determines how many water-grabbing hydroxyl groups the final gel carries, manufacturers may gain a new, low-cost lever for tuning desiccants without exotic reagents or expensive processing.</p>
<p>The team, led by Cyrill Joël Ngally Sabouang and Jean Aimé Mbey and drawn from the University of Yaoundé I, the University of Bamenda and the University of Ngaoundere, started with kaolin clay from the Mayouom locality of Cameroon. Kaolinite, the dominant mineral in this clay, is a layered silicate made of one tetrahedral silica sheet stacked on one octahedral alumina sheet, with an ideal formula of Al2Si2O5(OH)4. That structure means kaolinite contains roughly 46.5 percent silicon dioxide by mass, making it an attractive and abundant feedstock for producing amorphous silica, the reactive form of the material prized for adsorption applications. Prior to synthesis, the raw clay was wet-sieved at 45 micrometers, dried, and characterized as containing more than 80 weight percent kaolinite with good structural organization.</p>
<p>The first critical transformation was thermal. Heating the kaolin in a muffle furnace to 650 degrees Celsius at 5 degrees per minute, holding for one hour, and then cooling converted the crystalline kaolinite into amorphous metakaolinite. X-ray diffraction confirmed the change: the characteristic kaolinite reflection at 7.16 angstroms vanished, replaced by a broad diffraction halo between 20 and 35 degrees two-theta that signals a disordered, glass-like atomic arrangement. Infrared spectroscopy told the same story from a different angle. The sharp O-H stretching bands of kaolinite at 3691 and 3620 inverse centimeters disappeared after calcination, evidence that the structural hydroxyls had been driven off and the crystal lattice disrupted. Thermal analysis added a third confirmation, showing the expected dehydroxylation event near 546 degrees with a 10.8 percent mass loss, and a later exothermic event near 1013 degrees marking the onset of mullite formation if the material were heated further.</p>
<p>Before gel synthesis, the metakaolin was purified by dispersing it in excess 3 molar hydrochloric acid for one hour under constant stirring, a treatment that dissolves metallic impurities such as iron oxide and calcium or magnesium compounds. After decantation and repeated washing with distilled water—until a silver nitrate test confirmed the supernatant was free of chloride ions—the cleaned solid was dried and stored airtight. The synthesis itself followed a classic sol-gel route: batches of 5, 10, 15 and 20 grams of treated metakaolin were dispersed in 100 milliliters of 8 molar sodium hydroxide, stirred for 20 minutes, and left for 24 hours. During this alkaline digestion, hydroxide ions attack the silicate network of the metakaolin, dissolving silicon species into solution as sodium silicate. The supernatant was filtered off, and the pH was dropped to 3 with hydrochloric acid, triggering the hydrolysis and condensation reactions that precipitate silica gel. The gels were collected by centrifugation, dried at room temperature, and labeled GS1:20 through GS4:20 according to their clay-to-solution ratios.</p>
<p>X-ray diffraction of the finished gels revealed a broad amorphous silica halo between 15 and 40 degrees two-theta in every sample, but the details differed in ways that turned out to be scientifically revealing. All gels contained crystalline reflections from halite—ordinary sodium chloride—formed either when excess sodium hydroxide reacted with the hydrochloric acid during the pH adjustment step, or when sodium silicate was directly neutralized during precipitation. Crucially, the intensity of the halite peak at 2.82 angstroms shrank as the metakaolin fraction increased, indicating that the dominant source of salt contamination was leftover alkali rather than the silicate itself. The researchers suggest that a post-centrifugation washing step could strip out much of this by-product, and note that the brief 3-minute spin at 2000 rpm may have left enough liquid in the cake for salt to precipitate during drying.</p>
<p>The highest metakaolin loading, GS4:20, produced the most distinctive mineralogy. Its halite peaks were faintest, its amorphous halo strongest, and its pattern showed traces of hydroxysodalite, an ordered aluminosilicate framework that the authors interpret as the beginning of crystallization from the silica oligomers in the gel. They attribute this to the mixture approaching a stoichiometric balance, leaving less free sodium available to form salt. The halo intensity ranked GS3:20 below GS2:20, below GS1:20, below GS4:20, consistent with more silica gel forming as more metakaolin was dissolved into the alkali.</p>
<p>Infrared spectroscopy then exposed how the ratio sculpted the gel&#8217;s molecular structure. All gels showed a broad band near 3385 inverse centimeters from O-H stretching of terminal silanol groups and adsorbed water, a Si-OH vibration near 930, an H-O-H bending band near 1640 from physically adsorbed water, and Si-O-Si stretching modes near 1010, 780 and 420. In GS4:20, the silanol and water bands were strongest, pointing to a network built from short oligomeric chains. Shorter chains mean more chain ends, and more chain ends mean more exposed hydroxyl groups available to hydrogen-bond with water molecules—an outcome directly beneficial for a desiccant. By contrast, gels made with less metakaolin, such as GS1:20, showed enhanced Si-O-Si bands without equivalent silanol signals, indicating longer polymer chains with fewer terminal hydroxyls, and trapped structural water instead.</p>
<p>Thermal analysis corroborated the spectroscopic picture. All samples lost physisorbed water below 100 degrees, but the temperature of that event increased in the order GS2:20, GS3:20, GS1:20, GS4:20, implying progressively stronger water-gel bonding forces. Only GS1:20 and GS2:20 showed additional water evaporation between 100 and 210 degrees, attributed to water trapped inside the growing silica network when more effective dissolution allowed optimal chain growth. Total mass loss rose with metakaolin content, again consistent with short-chain, hydroxyl-rich structures adsorbing more water. A thermal event near 800 degrees marked halite melting, weakest in GS4:20, matching the diffraction evidence of minimal salt in that sample.</p>
<p>The overall mechanistic narrative is one of competing interactions. When metakaolin is scarce, the abundant hydroxide solution interacts strongly and effectively with each silicate unit, dissolving species thoroughly and allowing silica particles to grow into extended chains that incorporate structural water. When metakaolin is plentiful, solid-solid interactions between particles stabilize them and limit their contact with the alkali, curtailing particle growth and freezing short oligomers rich in terminal hydroxyls into the network. Meanwhile, excess sodium hydroxide left over after sodium silicate formation reacts with the hydrochloric acid added for precipitation, generating the halite by-product that contaminates low-ratio gels.</p>
<p>The authors are careful to flag a limitation: the study did not specify sodium-to-silicon ratios in a normalized way, which may restrict how directly the conclusions transfer to metakaolins from other natural sources with different purities and reactivities. Even so, the practical takeaway is striking. By simply adjusting how much clay is loaded into the alkali bath, a producer can bias the product toward either long-chain gels with structural water or short-chain gels dense with adsorption-ready hydroxyl groups—tunable moisture retention from one of the cheapest raw materials on Earth. For a material that quietly protects everything from medicines to microchips against humidity, that kind of formulation control, derived from Cameroonian kaolin and conventional laboratory reagents, could reshape how low-cost desiccants are designed.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effect of metakaolin mass fraction in sodium hydroxide on sol-gel silica gel structure and water retention</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Influence of the metakaolin mass fraction in sodium hydroxide solution on the synthesis of silica gel from metakaolin</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Influence of the metakaolin mass fraction in sodium hydroxide solution on the synthesis of silica gel from metakaolin. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44508-026-00015-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44508-026-00015-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44508-026-00015-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44508-026-00015-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> metakaolin, silica gel, sol-gel, kaolinite, sodium hydroxide, amorphous silica, X-ray diffraction, FTIR, thermal analysis, desiccant, hydroxysodalite, materials chemistry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">193870</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
