<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dendrite suppression in lithium batteries &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/dendrite-suppression-in-lithium-batteries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 02:10:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Corn Starch Electrolyte Boosted Tenfold with Plasticizer and Graphene Oxide</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/corn-starch-electrolyte-boosted-tenfold-with-plasticizer-and-graphene-oxide/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Sanderson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 02:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced solid-state electrolyte development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodegradable lithium-ion battery electrolytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biopolymer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corn starch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corn starch electrolyte enhancement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dendrite suppression in lithium batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dielectric behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrochemical impedance spectroscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTIR spectroscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphene oxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphene oxide nanofillers in electrolytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ionic conductivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithium perchlorate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithium perchlorate salt in biopolymer matrices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithium-ion batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plasticizer effects on biopolymer electrolytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pluronic plasticizer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable biopolymer-based energy storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[room-temperature ionic conductivity improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safer and greener battery technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid polymer electrolyte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable energy storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable materials for battery electrolytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermally stable electrolyte films]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=200712</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers boosted the ionic conductivity of corn starch solid polymer electrolytes nearly tenfold by adding Pluronic plasticizer and graphene oxide nanofiller, achieving 3.55 × 10⁻⁵ S cm⁻¹ at room temperature with an ion transference number of 0.90.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A team of researchers at Quaid-i-Azam University in Islamabad has shown that an ordinary kitchen staple, corn starch, can be transformed into a surprisingly capable solid electrolyte for lithium-ion batteries when it is combined with the right additives. In work published in Discover Electrochemistry, Muhammad Numan, Sajal Arwish, Khizar Hayat Khan, Syed Mujtaba Shah, and Hazrat Hussain report that blending lithium perchlorate salt into a biodegradable corn starch matrix, then further adding the triblock copolymer Pluronic as a plasticizer and tiny amounts of graphene oxide as a nanofiller, lifts the room-temperature ionic conductivity to 3.55 × 10⁻⁵ S cm⁻¹, nearly ten times higher than a starch-salt electrolyte on its own. Because the optimized film also delivers an ion transference number of 0.90 and remains thermally stable above 230 °C, the study offers a compelling case that renewable biopolymers can compete with synthetic polymer hosts in the race toward safer, greener energy storage.</p>
<p>The motivation stems from a well-known weakness of conventional lithium-ion batteries. Since their commercial debut in 1991, these devices have relied on flammable liquid organic carbonate electrolytes that permit uneven lithium flux and the growth of metallic dendrites, structures that can pierce the separator, trigger internal short circuits, thermal runaway, and in extreme cases fire or explosion. Solid-state electrolytes act as a physical barrier to dendrite growth and are widely regarded as the safest long-term solution. Inorganic ceramic conductors achieve superb conductivities between 10⁻³ and 10⁻² S cm⁻¹ but are brittle, hard to process at scale, and suffer from high interfacial impedance. Polymer electrolytes, by contrast, are flexible and electrode-compatible but typically conduct at a sluggish 10⁻⁷ S cm⁻¹, a gap the new work sets out to narrow using sustainable materials.</p>
<p>Composite polymer electrolytes, which disperse a secondary filler into a polymer host, have long been used to push conductivity upward. Fillers suppress polymer recrystallization, create amorphous regions and grain boundaries, and promote salt dissociation through Lewis acid-base interactions. Yet most polymer hosts studied to date, including polyethylene oxide, poly(methyl methacrylate), PVDF, polyacrylonitrile and poly(vinyl alcohol), derive from fossil feedstocks and are not biodegradable. Biopolymers offer a striking alternative: cellulose, chitosan, lignin and starch are abundant, renewable, nontoxic and richly decorated with polar hydroxyl and ether groups that can coordinate lithium ions and host high salt loadings. Corn starch in particular, composed of roughly 20 to 30 percent linear amylose and 70 to 80 percent branched amylopectin linked by alpha glycosidic bonds, is cheap, lightweight and compatible with ionic salts, making it an attractive host for solid electrolyte research.</p>
<p>The researchers fabricated their films by solution casting. Corn starch was dispersed in a dilute acetic acid solution at 80 °C, lithium perchlorate was added in concentrations from 20 to 50 weight percent, and the mixtures were stirred, cast onto Teflon dishes and dried under vacuum to yield free-standing membranes roughly 140 micrometers thick. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy identified 40 weight percent salt as the optimum: below that limit, conductivity rose with charge carrier concentration, while above it undissociated salt accumulated and impeded ion motion. Building on that baseline, the team introduced Pluronic, a PEG-PPG-PEG triblock copolymer, at 10 to 30 weight percent, and finally dispersed graphene oxide, synthesized by the modified Hummers method, at loadings of 0.1 to 0.7 weight percent into the best plasticized formulation.</p>
<p>Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy revealed exactly what each additive does to the starch structure. The ratio of the crystalline band at 993 cm⁻¹ to the amorphous band at 1015 cm⁻¹, a standard order parameter, fell from 1.24 for neat starch to 0.98 with salt, then to 0.69 after Pluronic addition and to 0.65 once graphene oxide was incorporated. Peak shifts and broadening across the fingerprint region confirmed complexation between lithium ions and the starch oxygen atoms, while the gradual disappearance of the band at 1366 cm⁻¹ signaled progressive disruption of crystalline order. The result is a predominantly amorphous matrix in which polymer chain segments can move freely, a prerequisite for fast ion hopping through the electrolyte.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most elegant finding involves the perchlorate anion band near 623 cm⁻¹. By deconvoluting the overlapping peaks corresponding to free perchlorate and contact ion pairs, the authors quantified the fraction of dissociated salt in each film. That fraction climbed steadily as Pluronic and then graphene oxide were added, providing direct spectroscopic evidence that both additives actively break lithium-perchlorate ion pairs. Pluronic is no ordinary diluent: because its PEG and PPG segments contain ether oxygens that coordinate lithium ions, it participates directly in conduction pathways while also softening the film. Graphene oxide, with its dense surface population of hydroxyl and carboxyl groups, interacts with the salt through Lewis acid-base chemistry and creates low-energy percolation channels at the polymer-filler interface. Both effects multiply the population of mobile charge carriers.</p>
<p>The electrical measurements tell a consistent story. Room-temperature conductivity climbed from the salt-only baseline to 1.33 × 10⁻⁵ S cm⁻¹ at the optimal 20 weight percent Pluronic loading, and then to 3.55 × 10⁻⁵ S cm⁻¹ with 0.5 weight percent graphene oxide, roughly triple the plasticized value. Beyond 0.5 percent, graphene oxide sheets aggregate into insulating barriers that disrupt the conduction network, a phenomenon the group had documented previously in PVDF-HFP/Pluronic blend systems. Temperature-dependent impedance from 20 to 80 °C showed classic Arrhenius behavior, with conductivity reaching 6.45 × 10⁻⁴ S cm⁻¹ at 80 °C and the activation energy falling stepwise from 0.69 eV for the salt-only film to 0.67 eV with plasticizer and 0.59 eV with the nanofiller, confirming that the additives smooth the energetic landscape for lithium-ion hopping.</p>
<p>Direct-current polarization measurements using ion-blocking electrodes added a crucial safety metric. The ion transference number rose from 0.58 at 20 weight percent salt to 0.76 at 40 weight percent, then to 0.82 with Pluronic and finally to 0.90 in the fully optimized composite, indicating that ionic conduction overwhelmingly dominates over electronic leakage. Dielectric analysis reinforced the picture: both the dielectric constant and dielectric loss surged in the low-frequency regime as Pluronic and graphene oxide were added, a hallmark of increased free-ion density and enhanced electrode polarization. According to Bjerrum theory, the elevated dielectric constant also shortens the critical distance for ion-pair formation, further favoring salt dissociation, while the higher permittivity exponentially boosts charge carrier density. Electric modulus formalism, which suppresses electrode polarization, showed no relaxation peak within the measured frequency window, implying ion hopping times shorter than 1.6 × 10⁻⁷ seconds, fast dynamics for a biopolymer electrolyte.</p>
<p>Thermal data close the loop on practicality. Differential scanning calorimetry showed that the onset of chain fragmentation shifts downward as salt, plasticizer and filler are added, from 272 °C for the 20 weight percent salt film to about 253 °C for the optimized composite, but all samples remain comfortably above the operating temperatures of real batteries. The optimized conductivity is comparable to other reported systems such as starch/PEGMA (3.8 × 10⁻⁵ S cm⁻¹) and PEO/sepiolite nanoribbon composites (9.22 × 10⁻⁵ S cm⁻¹), though it trails ionic-liquid and chemically modified electrolytes in the 10⁻⁴ to 10⁻³ S cm⁻¹ range. The authors caution that their study was limited to structural characterization, impedance and dielectric analysis; validating the electrolyte in actual cells will require linear sweep and cyclic voltammetry to establish the electrochemical stability window, along with full-cell testing. If those trials succeed, tomorrow&#8217;s batteries could draw part of their backbone not from petrochemicals but from a crop grown on farms worldwide, a small but meaningful step toward truly sustainable energy storage.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Biodegradable corn starch-based solid polymer electrolytes enhanced with lithium perchlorate, Pluronic plasticizer, and graphene oxide nanofiller for sustainable lithium-ion battery applications.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Pluronic and graphene oxide influence the structural properties as well as the ionic conductivity and dielectric behavior of corn starch based solid electrolytes</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Numan, M., Arwish, S., Khan, K. H., Shah, S. M., &amp; Hussain, H. (2026). Pluronic and graphene oxide influence the structural properties as well as the ionic conductivity and dielectric behavior of corn starch based solid electrolytes. <em>Discover Electrochemistry, 3</em>(1), Article 69. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44373-026-00157-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44373-026-00157-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44373-026-00157-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44373-026-00157-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> solid polymer electrolyte, corn starch, graphene oxide, Pluronic plasticizer, ionic conductivity, lithium perchlorate, dielectric behavior, biopolymer, lithium-ion batteries, FTIR spectroscopy, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, sustainable energy storage</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">200712</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Void-Suppressing Lithium Anodes Could Improve All-Solid-State Batteries</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/void-suppressing-lithium-anodes-could-improve-all-solid-state-batteries/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 03:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced lithium anode engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all-solid-state battery energy density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dendrite suppression in lithium batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrode-electrolyte interface stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improving lithium-metal battery lifespan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithium anode void formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithium stripping and plating dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithium-metal battery safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitigation of lithium dendrite growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid electrolyte interface issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid-state battery failure mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[void suppression capability (VSC) in battery design]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/void-suppressing-lithium-anodes-could-improve-all-solid-state-batteries/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The lithium-metal battery has long been regarded as the ultimate prize in rechargeable energy storage: lithium is exceptionally light, and a metallic lithium anode can store far more charge per unit mass than the graphite used in most commercial batteries. Replacing flammable liquid electrolytes with solid materials could also improve safety and enable batteries with [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lithium-metal battery has long been regarded as the ultimate prize in rechargeable energy storage: lithium is exceptionally light, and a metallic lithium anode can store far more charge per unit mass than the graphite used in most commercial batteries. Replacing flammable liquid electrolytes with solid materials could also improve safety and enable batteries with greater energy density. Yet one of the most stubborn obstacles has remained hidden inside the battery interface itself. During charging and discharging, lithium can be removed unevenly from the metal electrode, leaving behind microscopic empty regions known as voids. Those gaps disrupt electrical contact, concentrate current into smaller areas and can eventually encourage needle-like lithium structures called dendrites. A study published in <em>Nature Materials</em> now reports a strategy for designing lithium anodes that resist this failure pathway, while identifying a quantitative rule that links void formation to both how much lithium is removed and how quickly it is extracted.</p>
<p>The researchers show that void formation is governed by the product of the lithium full-stripping areal capacity and the applied current density. They describe this combined quantity through a parameter called void suppression capability, or VSC. In practical terms, the metric captures a central trade-off in solid-state cells: stripping a large amount of lithium at a high current places a severe demand on the metal anode, because lithium atoms must move through the electrode quickly enough to replenish the interface as lithium ions migrate into the electrolyte. If the supply cannot keep pace with the electrochemical reaction, the interface begins to lose physical contact. Instead of remaining a uniform, electronically connected surface, it develops cavities where lithium has been depleted. The VSC framework provides a way to compare anodes according to how effectively their internal atomic transport can prevent that process.</p>
<p>At the heart of the problem is the difference between ionic and electronic transport in a solid-state battery. During discharge, lithium atoms in the metal anode give up electrons and become lithium ions, which travel through the solid electrolyte toward the cathode. During charging, lithium ions return and are reduced back to metallic lithium at the anode. For the reaction to remain stable, newly deposited lithium must spread across the interface, while lithium being stripped must be supplied from the bulk metal. In a liquid electrolyte, fluid motion and intimate wetting can help maintain contact, but a solid electrolyte does not readily flow into newly formed gaps. A void can therefore act like a growing crack in the electrochemical pathway. The local current then becomes concentrated around the remaining contact points, increasing the likelihood of uneven deposition and dendrite growth when the battery is charged again.</p>
<p>The study identifies two material properties that improve VSC: lithium self-diffusivity and the initial concentration of lithium atoms available to move through the metal. Self-diffusivity describes the thermally activated motion of lithium atoms within the anode. A higher value means that atoms can redistribute more rapidly in response to concentration gradients created during stripping. This redistribution can help replenish regions beneath the electrolyte interface before they become isolated and empty. The initial lithium atom concentration, meanwhile, affects how much mobile material is available to sustain the reaction. Together, these factors determine whether the anode can accommodate a demanding current without losing continuity. The finding shifts attention away from treating voids as an unavoidable consequence of solid-state operation and toward engineering the microscopic transport properties of the lithium itself.</p>
<p>To test that idea, the researchers introduced a small amount of magnesium and lanthanum into molten lithium. The resulting material, described as LiMgLa, contains magnesium with 1 weight percent lanthanum and was designed to refine the metal’s grain structure. Grain refinement changes the network of boundaries and pathways through which atoms move inside a polycrystalline metal. In the researchers’ experiments, the inoculant increased lithium self-diffusivity and improved the anode’s void suppression capability. The comparison was made with a LiMg anode, which contained magnesium but not the lanthanum addition. This type of alloying is significant because it does not depend solely on coating the electrode or modifying the solid electrolyte. Instead, it alters the transport behavior of the lithium electrode throughout its volume, potentially allowing the metal to respond more quickly as lithium is stripped from and plated back onto its surface.</p>
<p>The improvement was reflected in the critical operating limits of the anodes. For the LiMg material, the critical current density and areal capacity were reported as 1.2 milliamperes per square centimeter and 0.6 milliampere-hours per square centimeter, respectively. With the LiMgLa anode, those values increased to 2.2 milliamperes per square centimeter and 1.1 milliampere-hours per square centimeter. Critical current density indicates how rapidly charge can be transferred per unit area before unstable behavior emerges, while areal capacity describes how much charge is moved through a defined electrode area. These measures are especially important for practical batteries because increasing the active material loading and operating at higher power both raise the amount of lithium that must be transported through the interface. An anode that survives only gentle laboratory cycling may offer little advantage in a high-energy cell, whereas a wider operating window could make solid-state designs more relevant to electric vehicles and other demanding applications.</p>
<p>The LiMgLa electrodes also enabled stable lithium plating and stripping for more than 1,200 hours at room temperature under a current density of 0.7 milliamperes per square centimeter. Plating refers to the deposition of metallic lithium during charging, while stripping is the removal of lithium during discharge. Repeating these processes without rapid failure is difficult because each cycle can magnify small variations in contact, surface roughness and local current density. The reported endurance suggests that the refined alloy can maintain a more uniform electrochemical interface over long operation, although a laboratory symmetric-cell result is not equivalent to demonstrating a complete commercial battery. Full cells introduce additional complications, including cathode limitations, interfacial chemical reactions, mechanical pressure changes and the need to balance the amount of lithium against the cathode’s capacity. Even so, long-duration cycling at room temperature is an important demonstration that the material’s benefits are not limited to a single short experiment.</p>
<p>The researchers used phase-field modelling to examine how void formation and dendrite growth are connected. Phase-field models simulate the evolution of interfaces by representing transitions between different material states—such as lithium metal, solid electrolyte and empty space—through spatially varying fields. Rather than tracking every atom, the method calculates how thermodynamics, diffusion and electrochemical forces reshape the interface over time. The modelling indicates that the interfacial overpotential becomes larger than the electrolyte’s critical overpotential when the stripped capacity exceeds 70 percent of the full depletion capacity. Overpotential is the additional voltage required to drive an electrochemical reaction beyond its equilibrium condition. Once it passes the critical value, the interface can become unstable, favouring localized lithium deposition and dendritic structures. This 70 percent threshold offers a practical warning: operating too close to complete local lithium depletion may trigger failure even if the average current appears acceptable.</p>
<p>That threshold also helps explain why voids and dendrites should be treated as parts of the same failure sequence rather than as entirely separate problems. Stripping can first create a gap and reduce the area through which current flows. The remaining contact area then carries a larger fraction of the total current, increasing the local current density and interfacial overpotential. During the next charging step, lithium preferentially deposits at sites where the electrochemical conditions are most favorable, potentially producing protrusions that grow toward or through the solid electrolyte. Those dendrites can cause short circuits, while the mechanical stress associated with deposition can further damage the interface. By improving atomic self-diffusion, the LiMgLa alloy appears to reduce the likelihood that the initial void will form, thereby interrupting the chain of events before current focusing and unstable growth begin. The work therefore presents an anode-centered route to controlling a problem often attributed primarily to the solid electrolyte.</p>
<p>The findings provide a design rule for all-solid-state lithium-metal batteries: maximize the anode’s ability to redistribute lithium, and avoid operating conditions that strip the metal beyond the point where the interface can remain supplied. The proposed VSC concept could help researchers compare different lithium alloys, microstructures and processing methods using a common framework rather than relying only on trial-and-error cycling. It may also guide the selection of electrode thickness, applied current and usable lithium inventory in future cells. Important questions remain, including how the alloy behaves against different solid electrolytes, how it performs under practical stack pressures and whether the lanthanum-containing composition can be manufactured economically at large scale. Nevertheless, by connecting atomic motion to a measurable operating limit and demonstrating more than 1,200 hours of stable cycling, the study offers a concrete path toward lithium-metal batteries that combine high energy density with the mechanical and electrochemical stability required for real-world use.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Void-suppressive lithium-metal anodes for all-solid-state batteries</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Void suppressive lithium anodes for all-solid-state batteries</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Ji, X., Liu, Y., He, X. <i>et al.</i> “Void suppressive lithium anodes for all-solid-state batteries.” <i>Nature Materials</i> (2026). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-026-02729-w">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-026-02729-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-026-02729-w</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> all-solid-state batteries, lithium-metal anodes, void formation, dendrite growth, lithium self-diffusivity, void suppression capability, LiMgLa alloy, solid electrolytes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">182623</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
