<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>deep learning image analysis &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/deep-learning-image-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 15:55:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Man-Made Soil Pores Boost Crop Yields by Helping Roots Break Through Compacted Ground</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/man-made-soil-pores-boost-crop-yields-by-helping-roots-break-through-compacted-ground/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 15:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial macropores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial soil macropores for crop yield increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biopores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crop root exploration in compacted soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crop yield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep learning image analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought resilience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthworms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of soil aeration on crop productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field experiment on soil pore creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improving water and nutrient access in compacted soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term benefits of soil pore intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitigating traffic-induced soil compaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[root growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[root length density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil compaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil compaction alleviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil melioration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil pore creation for root penetration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil restoration techniques for degraded farmland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subsoil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subsoil compaction impact on agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable soil management practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winter wheat]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=271395</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[German researchers show that manually created vertical macropores help crop roots bypass compacted subsoil, boosting grain yields by up to 15 percent and enhancing drought resilience.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Farmers have long battled a hidden enemy beneath their fields: compacted subsoil that blocks roots from reaching the water and nutrients stored deep underground. Now, a team of German researchers has shown that a strikingly simple intervention—punching narrow vertical holes into the soil—can give crops a way through. In a two-year field experiment published in the journal Plant and Soil, Elron Wiedermann, Miriam Athmann, and Axel Don demonstrated that artificial macropores, created by pushing 10-millimeter steel rods 80 centimeters into the ground, significantly increased grain yields and transformed the way cereal roots explore the subsoil. The findings suggest a new strategy for restoring soil function on farmland degraded by decades of heavy machinery.</p>
<p>The scale of the problem is considerable. In Germany, roughly 51 percent of agricultural soils contain compacted layers within the top meter, with traffic-induced compaction concentrated between 30 and 50 centimeters deep. Compacted soil raises penetration resistance and limits oxygen diffusion, both of which impede root elongation. While topsoil compaction can be addressed by routine tillage, subsoil compaction persists for decades, quietly capping the productivity of fields across the temperate zone. Because subsoils can supply between 10 and 70 percent of the nutrients and up to 65 percent of the water a crop needs, cutting roots off from these reserves is a serious constraint on yield stability, particularly during drought.</p>
<p>Existing remedies fall short. Mechanical deep loosening temporarily reduces bulk density but often fails to produce lasting effects and leaves soil vulnerable to recompaction. Biological approaches, such as growing perennial crops like lucerne to generate natural biopores, take at least three years and sacrifice cash-crop revenue. Earthworms, nature&#8217;s own burrowers, are themselves constrained by high soil bulk density. The research team set out to test whether artificial macropores could sidestep these limitations, acting as ready-made channels that roots could use immediately.</p>
<p>The experiment was conducted at two sites in northern Germany with contrasting soils: a loamy sand near Schwerin and a silt loam near Adenstedt, both classified as stagnic Luvisols. In February 2024, the researchers established randomized, fourfold-replicated field trials in winter wheat at the tillering stage. Using steel rods and wooden templates, they manually created vertical pores of 10 millimeters in diameter to a depth of 80 centimeters at densities of 50, 100, and 200 pores per square meter. In total, more than 12,000 artificial pores were installed by hand. The trials were sampled in 2024 and again in 2025, with winter wheat grown at the silt loam site in both years and winter barley at the loamy sand site in the second year.</p>
<p>The yield results were clear. At the loamy sand site, 100 artificial pores per square meter increased grain yield by 9 to 15 percent, equivalent to 0.72 to 1.14 megagrams per hectare, compared with control plots containing only naturally occurring biopores. At the silt loam site, the same treatment raised yields by about 3 percent. Notably, the gains were larger on the more compacted loamy sand and in the drier year of 2025, when growing-season precipitation at the loamy sand site was 59 percent lower than in 2024. At the silt loam, yield rose on average by roughly 3 kilograms per hectare for each additional artificial pore per square meter, though the incremental benefit declined above densities of about 151 pores per square meter.</p>
<p>The mechanism behind these gains lies underground. Using the trench profile method combined with convolutional neural network-based image analysis—the researchers trained a RootPainter segmentation model on 200 images to quantify root length—the team found that artificial pores increased root length density in the subsoil by an average of 91 plus or minus 18 percent across both sites and years. In the 50-to-80-centimeter layer, root length density rose by 120 plus or minus 28 percent, and even below the pores, in the 80-to-100-centimeter layer, it increased by 101 plus or minus 34 percent. Root dry weight in the subsoil rose by about 10 percent under the 100-pore treatment, with significant increases of 16 percent at 50 to 80 centimeters and 13 percent at 80 to 100 centimeters.</p>
<p>Crucially, the roots were not simply trapped inside the artificial channels. Detailed image analysis of vertical strips centered on individual pores showed that roots grew along the pores and extended one to two centimeters into the surrounding bulk soil, with markedly intensified exploration below 50 centimeters and just beneath the lower end of the pores at 80 to 100 centimeters. This contrasts with earlier Australian observations where wheat roots in biopores were effectively imprisoned by impenetrable surrounding soil. The researchers attribute the difference to lower maximum bulk density at their sites, 1.68 grams per cubic centimeter on the loamy sand, and to the fact that roots bypassed the most compacted layer between 30 and 50 centimeters before re-entering the bulk soil below.</p>
<p>One of the study&#8217;s most surprising findings concerns root preference. The team had hypothesized that natural biopores, enriched with nutrients from earthworm casts and decayed roots, would be more attractive to roots than the sterile artificial pores. The opposite proved true: 86 plus or minus 1 percent of artificial pores were colonized by at least one root, compared with 72 plus or minus 1 percent of biopores. Artificial pores also contained 140 percent more pores hosting three roots and 280 percent more hosting four or more roots than biopores. The authors suggest that reduced penetration resistance and higher oxygen concentrations inside the perfectly vertical, structurally intact artificial channels matter more to roots than nutrient-enriched pore walls. Vertical pores also withstand traffic-induced pressure better than the inclined burrows of earthworms, preserving pore continuity and aeration.</p>
<p>The earthworm story adds an intriguing dimension. Four months after pore creation, 1.4 percent of artificial pores at the silt loam site were already colonized by the anecic earthworm Lumbricus terrestris, rising to 3.5 percent one year later. Earthworms still preferred natural biopores, being 3.4 times more likely to occupy them, but the rapid adoption of artificial channels hints at a positive feedback loop: earthworms may maintain and enrich the artificial pores over time, coating their walls with casts and connecting them to natural biopore networks. No decline in artificial pore density was detected over the one-and-a-half-year study period, and the authors expect the pores to persist for decades in loamy subsoils, though they caution that sandy or very clayey soils may not support such stability.</p>
<p>The implications extend beyond yield. Enhanced root biomass means more carbon input into subsoils, where organic carbon is typically scarce and newly added carbon persists longer, raising the prospect of what the authors call a win-win-win outcome for crop productivity, drought resilience, and soil carbon stocks. Because the measured bulk densities at both sites remained below critical thresholds for harmful compaction under European soil monitoring standards, the approach may benefit not only severely degraded headlands but ordinary loamy cropland as well. The researchers emphasize that open questions remain, including the economics of pore installation, optimal pore depth, and long-term effects across multiple seasons. But as climate change brings longer and more frequent droughts, the idea that a steel rod pushed into the ground can open a lifeline for crop roots offers a remarkably low-tech path toward more resilient agriculture.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Field testing of artificial macropores as a subsoil melioration strategy to improve root access to compacted subsoils and increase crop productivity</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Artificial macropores increase crop productivity through improved root access to subsoils</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Wiedermann, E., Athmann, M., &amp; Don, A. (2026). Artificial macropores increase crop productivity through improved root access to subsoils. <em>Plant and Soil</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09016-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09016-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09016-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11104-026-09016-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> artificial macropores, soil compaction, subsoil, root growth, root length density, crop yield, biopores, earthworms, drought resilience, soil melioration, winter wheat, deep learning image analysis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">271395</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Silver Particles on Graphite: A Cleaner Route to Model Catalysts for Ethylene Epoxidation</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/silver-particles-on-graphite-a-cleaner-route-to-model-catalysts-for-ethylene-epoxidation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 06:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atomic-scale studies of silver catalysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catalyst surface analysis techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catalyst surface characterization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean model catalyst development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep learning image analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethylene epoxidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethylene epoxidation mechanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethylene oxide production technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphite-supported silver particles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heterogeneous catalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HOPG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in situ spectroscopy of catalytic surfaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial vs. laboratory catalyst studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[model catalysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[model catalysts for chemical reactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoparticle deposition on graphite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoparticles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ostwald ripening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scanning electron microscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scanning tunneling microscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silver catalyst preparation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silver catalysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=243499</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have identified an electron-beam deposition method on freshly cleaved graphite that produces large, uniformly distributed silver particles with high surface coverage, creating ideal model catalysts for studying the industrially vital ethylene epoxidation reaction.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethylene oxide is one of the most quietly important chemicals in the modern world. It feeds the production of antifreeze, polyester fibers, detergents, and countless medical sterilization processes, and virtually all of it is manufactured by passing ethylene and oxygen over silver catalysts. Yet despite more than eight decades of industrial use, the atomic-scale details of how silver converts ethylene to its epoxide remain contested. A team of researchers at the Boreskov Institute of Catalysis in Novosibirsk, working with a colleague at the Prokhorov General Physics Institute in Moscow, has now tackled a deceptively simple prerequisite for resolving that debate: how to build a clean, well-defined model catalyst that scientists can actually watch while it works. Their study, published in Catalysis Letters, compares preparation strategies for depositing large silver particles on highly oriented pyrolytic graphite, or HOPG, and identifies a method that produces surfaces ideally suited for in situ spectroscopy and microscopy.</p>
<p>The appeal of model catalysts lies in their simplicity. Industrial ethylene epoxidation catalysts consist of silver particles dispersed on porous alumina, often promoted with chlorine, cesium, and other additives. That complexity is a nightmare for mechanistic studies: signals from the support, the promoters, and the metal all overlap in spectroscopic measurements, and the roughness of the porous support frustrates high-resolution imaging. A model catalyst replaces this tangled system with a flat, chemically well-defined substrate carrying metal particles whose size, shape, and density are controlled by the experimenter. HOPG, with its atomically flat and chemically inert basal planes, has long been a favorite support for such studies. The catch is that silver does not wet graphite well, so depositing enough metal to cover a useful fraction of the surface without producing a continuous film is a genuine materials challenge.</p>
<p>The Novosibirsk group, led by Anna Nartova together with coauthors including Alexandra Ananina, Aleksey Dmitrachkov, Ren Kvon, Maxim Panafidin, Boris Andryushechkin, and Valerii Bukhtiyarov, set out to prepare samples with large silver particles and high surface coverage, precisely the combination needed for X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, or XPS, studies of the epoxidation reaction. XPS is exquisitely sensitive to the chemical state of surface atoms, but it needs a substantial amount of the element of interest to produce strong, interpretable signals. If silver particles are too small or too sparse, the spectrum is dominated by the graphite support and the oxygen-bearing species on the silver cannot be tracked reliably. Large particles, in contrast, generate robust Ag 3d and O 1s signals, but growing them uniformly across a flat support is easier said than done.</p>
<p>The researchers compared several preparation routes, and the results reveal how sensitively the final catalyst morphology depends on the details of the deposition process. One approach involved damaging the graphite basal plane by etching with argon ions before depositing silver. The logic is straightforward: defects on the otherwise inert graphite surface act as nucleation sites where silver atoms can anchor, potentially increasing the density of particles and the coverage they achieve. In practice, however, the strategy produced two unwelcome side effects. First, the dense population of closely spaced particles merged as they grew, forming a film-like silver coating rather than the discrete, well-separated particles that mechanistic studies require. Second, and perhaps more insidiously, the damaged graphite promoted encapsulation of silver particles by carbon layers, a phenomenon known as Ag-C encapsulation, in which the metal becomes partially buried beneath graphitic material.</p>
<p>Both effects are fatal for the intended purpose. A film-like coating no longer models the dispersed particles of a real catalyst, so any particle-size or geometry effects on reactivity are lost. Encapsulation is worse still, because it changes which silver atoms are actually exposed to the reactant gases and can create misleading spectroscopic signatures. A sample whose active surface is partially hidden under carbon cannot serve as a trustworthy platform for studying how oxygen species on silver convert ethylene to ethylene oxide. The authors conclude that argon-ion etching of the graphite basal plane, whatever its benefits for nucleation density, makes such samples unsuitable for reaction mechanistic studies, a cautionary finding for anyone tempted to use defect engineering to boost metal loading on graphitic supports.</p>
<p>The winning strategy was far less invasive: thermal vacuum deposition of silver using an electron-beam evaporator onto freshly peeled HOPG. By cleaving the graphite immediately before deposition, the researchers ensured an atomically clean basal plane free of adsorbed contamination, and the gentle thermal evaporation allowed silver to aggregate into discrete particles on the pristine surface. The resulting samples featured uniformly distributed, relatively flat silver particles with mean sizes that could be controlled across a range of roughly 30 to 100 nanometers. Crucially, the silver coverage reached up to 0.59 of the support surface area, meaning that nearly sixty percent of the graphite was decorated with silver particles, a loading high enough to yield strong XPS signals while still preserving the discrete-particle morphology that mechanistic work demands.</p>
<p>Quantifying these morphologies required more than eyeballing micrographs. The team combined scanning electron microscopy, scanning tunneling microscopy, and XPS with deep-learning image analysis, using tools developed by the group to extract particle-size distributions, the number of silver particles per unit area, and the fraction of the support covered by metal. This is a notable methodological point in its own right: manual counting of thousands of nanoparticles across multiple imaging modalities is slow and prone to operator bias, whereas convolutional neural networks can process microscopy images consistently and at scale. The deep-learning approach, which the authors have previously applied to scanning transmission electron microscopy data and to automated analysis of X-ray photoelectron spectra, allowed rigorous comparison between preparation methods on objective, quantitative footing.</p>
<p>The study also probed how the prepared samples behave under thermal treatment, a question of direct relevance to reaction conditions. When a sample containing 100-nanometer silver particles was annealed in vacuum at 500 degrees Celsius, the particles underwent Ostwald ripening, the classic coarsening process in which small particles shrink and disappear as their atoms migrate to feed larger neighbors. Ripening reduces the number of particles and shifts the size distribution upward, which means that any catalytic measurement performed after high-temperature treatment reflects a different surface than the one initially prepared. Documenting this behavior on the model system provides a benchmark for how much thermal history a given sample has experienced and helps researchers design experiments in which the particle population is stable, or at least well characterized, throughout the measurement.</p>
<p>The final validation came from the oxygen signal. Analysis of the O 1s XPS line confirmed that the prepared low-oxygen Ag/HOPG systems are suitable model catalysts for instrumental studies of ethylene epoxidation. In other words, the surfaces carry silver in a state where adsorbed and reactive oxygen species can be detected and distinguished from background oxygen on the support, opening the door to in situ experiments that track the chemical identity of the oxygen species responsible for selective epoxidation. That question, whether electrophilic oxygen species, nucleophilic oxygen, or some combination drives the selective pathway, has animated the epoxidation literature for years, and clean model systems are the key to answering it with spectroscopic rather than circumstantial evidence.</p>
<p>The broader significance of the work extends beyond one reaction. Ethylene epoxidation is a touchstone of heterogeneous catalysis, the rare example of a direct, selective oxidation of a hydrocarbon by molecular oxygen, and silver remains the only metal that performs it industrially. Recent studies continue to probe particle-size effects, the role of chlorine promoters, and the structure of active oxygen species on silver, and some groups are even exploring whether additives such as nickel can extend selective epoxidation beyond silver itself. All of these efforts depend on well-characterized surfaces, and the Novosibirsk study delivers a practical recipe: avoid damaging the graphite, deposit silver gently on freshly cleaved HOPG, control the mean particle size through deposition conditions, and verify the morphology with machine-learning-assisted microscopy. The result is a family of model catalysts with large, flat, uniformly distributed silver particles and coverage approaching sixty percent of the support, ready for the in situ XPS and scanning tunneling microscopy experiments that may finally pin down how silver turns ethylene into one of the chemical industry&#8217;s most valuable building blocks. The work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation under grant 24-63-00037.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Preparation of silver-on-graphite model catalysts for ethylene epoxidation studies</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Model Ag/HOPG Catalysis for Ethylene Epoxidation: Comparison of Methods for the Preparation of Large Ag Particles with High Surface Coverage</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Nartova, A. V., Ananina, А. A., Dmitrachkov, A. M., Kvon, R. I., Panafidin, M. A., Andryushechkin, B. V., &amp; Bukhtiyarov, V. I. (2026). Model Ag/HOPG Catalysis for Ethylene Epoxidation: Comparison of Methods for the Preparation of Large Ag Particles with High Surface Coverage. <em>Catalysis Letters, 156</em>(11), Article 295. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-026-05538-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-026-05538-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-026-05538-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10562-026-05538-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> silver catalysts, HOPG, ethylene epoxidation, XPS, scanning tunneling microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, nanoparticles, Ostwald ripening, deep learning image analysis, surface chemistry, heterogeneous catalysis, model catalysts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">243499</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
