<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>decarboxylation &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/decarboxylation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 23:13:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Cannula Position Makes or Breaks Carbon Dioxide Removal in High-Flow ECCO2R</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/cannula-position-makes-or-breaks-carbon-dioxide-removal-in-high-flow-ecco2r/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ophelia Keating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 23:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial lung device optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannula design in respiratory support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannula position]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinical outcomes of ECCO2R]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decarboxylation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECCO2R]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECMO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECMO cannula placement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extracorporeal blood flow rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extracorporeal CO2 removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extracorporeal CO2 removal technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-flow ECCO2R clinical trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICU extracorporeal blood circulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intensive care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanical ventilation assistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[membrane oxygenator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[membrane oxygenator efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recirculation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[respiratory failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veno-venous support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venous cannula positioning impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venous system cannulation techniques]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=260250</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A French study of high-flow ECCO2R found that centrally positioned draining cannulas cut recirculation from 59 percent to 9 percent and more than doubled carbon dioxide elimination compared with distal configurations.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For patients drowning in their own carbon dioxide, an artificial lung outside the body can be a lifeline. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal, or ECCO2R, draws blood out of a large vein, strips CO2 across a membrane oxygenator, and returns it to the circulation, easing the burden on failing lungs and allowing gentler mechanical ventilation. Yet the technology has struggled to prove itself in large clinical trials, and one of the most persistent suspicions has been that many devices simply do not remove enough CO2 to matter. A new study from a French intensive care unit now points to a surprisingly simple culprit: where exactly the draining cannula sits inside the venous system.</p>
<p>The research, conducted at Lapeyronie University Hospital in Montpellier and published in the Journal of Artificial Organs, analyzed 17 patients treated with high-flow ECCO2R between January 2018 and May 2024. All patients received extracorporeal blood flows of at least 2 liters per minute, delivered through an ECMO console with a large membrane oxygenator and two single-lumen cannulas inserted on the same side of the body. Because the drainage and reinfusion cannulas are separate, the team could deliberately vary the position of the draining cannula, creating four distinct configurations: central and distal versions of both a jugular-jugular and a femoro-femoral setup. In the central configurations, the multistage draining cannula was advanced through the right atrium, while in the distal configurations it remained close to the reinfusion cannula in the distal portions of the vena cava.</p>
<p>The physiological variable at the heart of the study is recirculation, a phenomenon familiar to anyone who works with extracorporeal circuits. When freshly reinfused blood is immediately sucked back into the draining cannula, the machine processes the same blood twice while the patient&#8217;s CO2-rich venous return flows past untouched. The team quantified this with a recirculation coefficient calculated from oxygen saturations in the inlet and outlet lines of the oxygenator, using an assumed mixed venous saturation of 65 percent, and validated the approach with sensitivity analyses across a range of plausible values. They also computed the effective extracorporeal blood flow, the portion of the pump flow that actually represents new blood from the patient, and measured CO2 elimination across the membrane in standard-temperature-and-pressure-dried milliliters per minute.</p>
<p>The results were stark. In the central drainage configurations, the median recirculation coefficient was just 9 percent, whereas the distal configurations produced a median of 59 percent, more than six times higher. Effective blood flow collapsed accordingly: about 2.1 liters per minute in the central setups versus 0.9 liters per minute in the distal ones, with the distal femoro-femoral configuration falling to a median of only 0.5 liters per minute. Because CO2 transfer depends on both how much blood crosses the membrane and how much CO2 that blood carries, this hidden shunting translated directly into lost decarboxylation. Median CO2 elimination was 122 milliliters per minute with central drainage but only 58 milliliters per minute with distal drainage, despite comparable nominal pump flows between the groups.</p>
<p>The statistical analysis went beyond simple comparison. Using multivariable linear mixed models that accounted for repeated measurements in each patient, the researchers examined how much CO2 elimination increased for each unit of the decarboxylation index, a product of blood flow and sweep gas flow that they had previously validated as a predictor of performance. For every additional unit of that index, CO2 elimination rose 5.2 times less under a distal drainage configuration than under a central one. Compared with the central jugular-jugular reference, the distal jugular-jugular setup lost 3.2 milliliters per minute of CO2 elimination per unit of index, and the distal femoro-femoral setup lost 5.2 milliliters per minute, both highly significant. The central femoro-femoral configuration performed nearly as well as the jugular reference, a difference that was not statistically significant.</p>
<p>The mechanics behind this failure of distal drainage are rooted in fluid dynamics and venous anatomy. In the distal portions of the superior or inferior vena cava, the available blood volume is small, the side holes of the cannula can be occluded by the venous wall, and the negative pressures generated by spontaneous breathing further reduce the suction gradient. As a result, the proportion of drainage drawn from freshly reinfused blood rapidly becomes dominant, and recirculation soars. High recirculation also lowers the CO2 content of the blood entering the oxygenator, and because diffusion across the membrane follows Fick&#8217;s law, a lower inlet CO2 concentration means less driving force for transfer. The machine appears to be working hard while accomplishing progressively less.</p>
<p>These findings carry an uncomfortable implication for standard practice. The authors note that their distal drainage configurations behave much like the single dual-lumen cannulas used in most ECCO2R programs worldwide, in which drainage and reinfusion ports coexist within one catheter. If distal drainage inherently produces high recirculation, the modest decarboxylation performance that has dogged dual-lumen ECCO2R may be a structural feature rather than a fixable flaw. Recent trials have suggested that only veno-venous systems running high blood flows, generally above 2 liters per minute, can meaningfully manage severe respiratory acidosis or reduce ventilator settings, and this study shows that even a nominally high-flow circuit can be quietly sabotaged by cannula geometry. No CO2 elimination value in the distal group reached 110 milliliters per minute.</p>
<p>The study also offers practical guidance for clinicians. The central jugular-jugular configuration, which routes drainage from the inferior vena cava through the right atrium, delivered the best rheological conditions but requires sedation, ultrasound guidance to advance the cannula across the atrium, and head positioning that is uncomfortable for awake patients. The central femoro-femoral configuration emerged as a compelling compromise, providing high and stable flows with acceptable recirculation even in seated, spontaneously breathing patients, thanks to wire-reinforced cannulas and proximal placement near the right atrium. The authors suggest it is particularly suited to awake patients undergoing respiratory weaning with non-invasive ventilation. A further advantage of the two-cannula approach is upgradeability: in case of refractory hypoxemia, the same access sites can be reconfigured into full veno-venous ECMO without new punctures.</p>
<p>Safety data temper the enthusiasm. Nine of the 17 patients, 53 percent, developed one or more thromboembolic events, all of them cannula-associated deep vein thromboses that occurred exclusively in the central drainage group and were detected by systematic CT scanning after decannulation. The authors suspect their anticoagulation targets were too lenient, particularly during the decannulation phase, when endothelial injury from catheter removal activates the coagulation cascade, and they point to percutaneous closure devices as a possible mitigation. The study has other limitations that the authors acknowledge candidly: it is a single-center retrospective analysis with a small and imbalanced cohort, only the first 72 hours of therapy were analyzed to avoid membrane fouling effects, and the recirculation calculation necessarily relies on an assumed mixed venous saturation. Clinical outcomes such as ventilation duration were not assessed. Still, the internal consistency of the findings, replicated across sensitivity analyses and mixed models, makes the central message hard to dismiss. In extracorporeal CO2 removal, the dose delivered to the patient is not set by the pump alone; it is set by the plumbing, and a cannula placed a few centimeters too distal can halve the therapy before it begins.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effect of draining cannula position on recirculation and CO2 elimination in high-flow extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Impact of draining cannula position and configuration under high-flow extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) on recirculation and extracorporeal decarboxylation</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Charbit, J., Muller, C., Girard, M., Courvalin, E., Dagod, G., Bouchdoug, K., Deras, P., Weber, H., &amp; Capdevila, X. (2026). Impact of draining cannula position and configuration under high-flow extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) on recirculation and extracorporeal decarboxylation. <em>Journal of Artificial Organs, 29</em>(4), Article 69. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-026-01582-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-026-01582-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-026-01582-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10047-026-01582-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> ECCO2R, extracorporeal CO2 removal, recirculation, cannula position, ECMO, decarboxylation, respiratory failure, ARDS, COPD, membrane oxygenator, veno-venous support, intensive care</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">260250</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Light and Electricity Join Forces to Forge Carbon-Carbon Bonds from Everyday Chemicals</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/light-and-electricity-join-forces-to-forge-carbon-carbon-bonds-from-everyday-chemicals/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 10:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced organic synthesis methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C(sp3)–C(sp3) bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon-carbon bond formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decarboxylation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct coupling of carboxylic acids and alcohols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electrocatalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy-efficient chemical reactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functional group activation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative catalysis in organic chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iron catalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ligand-to-metal charge transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural product and drug molecule construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nickel catalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic synthesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overcoming challenges in sp3 hybridized carbon bonding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photocatalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoelectrochemical synthesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoelectrochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radical sorting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radical-mediated carbon coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SH2 mechanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sp3–sp3 bond forging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable chemical synthesis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=227039</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Chemists at Harbin Institute of Technology have developed a photoelectrochemical method that joins saturated carbon atoms directly from carboxylic acids, alcohols and aldehydes using light, electricity and iron–nickel dual catalysis.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chemists have long dreamed of snapping together the carbon backbones of molecules the way children snap together building blocks — taking two simple, abundant starting materials and joining them directly to make something more valuable. A team at Harbin Institute of Technology in Shenzhen, China, has now brought that vision considerably closer to reality. In a study published in Nature Synthesis, Ping-Fu Zhong, Chao Yang, Lin Guo, Wujiong Xia and colleagues describe a photoelectrochemical strategy that welds two carbon atoms together directly from carboxylic acids, alcohols and aldehydes — the workhorse functional groups that chemists find ready-made in countless molecules — without any of the laborious pre-activation steps that such transformations traditionally demand.</p>
<p>The bond at the heart of the work is the C(sp3)–C(sp3) linkage, the connection between two tetrahedral, saturated carbon atoms. These bonds form the skeletal framework of the vast majority of drugs, agrochemicals and natural products, yet they remain among the hardest bonds for synthetic chemists to forge selectively. Conventional cross-coupling methods, which earned the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2010, excel at joining flat, sp2-hybridized carbons but struggle with the stubborn, unreactive sp3 carbons that dominate three-dimensional molecular architecture. Radical approaches — in which two carbon-centred radicals recombine — offer an appealing alternative, but they come with a fundamental catch.</p>
<p>That catch is diffusion control. When two free radicals meet in solution, they combine at essentially the rate at which random molecular motion brings them together. The chemistry offers no inherent preference for coupling two different radicals over two identical ones, so reactions tend to produce statistical mixtures: the desired cross-coupled product alongside wasteful homodimers of each partner. Compounding the problem, the transition-metal catalysts typically used to impose order on this chaos are exquisitely sensitive to the redox environment of the reaction. Radical generation is inherently a redox process, and the reactive intermediates it creates can push a delicate nickel or iron catalyst into inactive oxidation states, collapsing the very selectivity the catalyst is meant to provide.</p>
<p>The Harbin team&#8217;s solution is an elegant act of chemical bookkeeping: decoupling radical generation from catalytic redox maintenance. Instead of asking a single catalytic system to both create radicals and keep the cross-coupling catalyst in its productive state, the researchers split the labour. Light handles the first job through photoinduced ligand-to-metal charge transfer, a process in which a photon excites an electron from a ligand — here, a carboxylate or alkoxide bound to an iron centre — up to the metal, tearing the bond apart and releasing an alkyl radical under remarkably mild conditions. Electricity handles the second job, continuously regulating the redox balance of the catalytic cycle through the applied potential at the electrode, so that the metal catalyst neither accumulates in an over-reduced state nor burns out through over-oxidation.</p>
<p>Bringing these two energy inputs together with a dual-metal catalyst — iron for radical generation and nickel for selective bond formation — the system accomplishes an impressive range of transformations. Double decarboxylative couplings join two carboxylic acids by expelling carbon dioxide from both partners. Dehydroxymethylative couplings convert alcohols into alkyl radicals by cleaving a C–C bond adjacent to the hydroxyl group. Deformylative couplings do the same for aldehydes, stripping the formyl group to reveal the underlying alkyl fragment. In every case, the starting materials are native functional groups — the very handles already present in feedstock chemicals, metabolites and drug candidates — requiring no conversion into redox-active esters or other activated derivatives.</p>
<p>The substrate scope reported in the study is strikingly broad. The method accommodates primary, secondary and even sterically hindered tertiary carbon centres, and it works across every pairing: primary-to-primary, primary-to-secondary, secondary-to-secondary, primary-to-tertiary and even tertiary-to-tertiary couplings. Quaternary carbon centres — carbons bonded to four other carbons, a structural motif that confers biological potency but that synthetic chemists find notoriously difficult to construct — fall within reach. The authors also demonstrated applications to the synthesis of pharmaceutically relevant intermediates, suggesting the chemistry could shorten routes to drug candidates by allowing medicinal chemists to couple molecular fragments at late stages rather than building complex scaffolds from scratch.</p>
<p>How does the system avoid the statistical chaos that plagues ordinary radical recombination? The mechanistic studies point to a process called SH2 radical sorting, or bimolecular homolytic substitution at a metal centre. Rather than letting two radicals find each other freely in solution, the nickel catalyst captures one radical to form a high-valent organonickel species, and the second radical then attacks that complex directly, displacing the coupled product in a single, ordered step. This pathway imposes selectivity that diffusion-controlled recombination cannot, channelling the reaction toward the cross-coupled product. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry provided experimental support for this picture, tracking the radical intermediates and the oxidation states of the nickel catalyst as the reaction proceeded.</p>
<p>One of the most intriguing mechanistic findings concerns a seemingly humble additive: a sacrificial alkyl bromide. Mechanistic analysis indicated that this reagent prevents over-reduction of nickel, sustaining a Ni(II)/Ni(III) catalytic cycle — the oxidation-state shuttle that mediates the selective radical cross-coupling. In an electrochemical setting, where the electrode continuously pumps electrons into the system, keeping the catalyst from sliding into an inactive low-valent state is a genuine challenge. The sacrificial bromide acts as a redox buffer, preferentially accepting electrons that would otherwise reduce the nickel catalyst beyond its productive cycle. It is a small molecular chaperone with an outsized role in keeping the entire catalytic machine running.</p>
<p>The significance of the work extends beyond any single reaction. It sits at the confluence of three rapidly advancing fields: photocatalysis, electrocatalysis and first-row transition-metal catalysis. By using earth-abundant iron and nickel rather than precious metals, and by drawing energy from light and electricity rather than stoichiometric chemical oxidants and reductants, the approach aligns with the growing demand for sustainable synthesis. The electrochemical component also offers something batch chemistry rarely can: a tunable dial. By adjusting the applied potential, chemists can influence which intermediates form and which oxidation states persist, effectively programming the reaction&#8217;s selectivity through waveform control — a concept that has already transformed related electrochemical transformations such as modern versions of the century-old Kolbe electrolysis.</p>
<p>For the broader chemistry community, the study offers a template for taming radical reactions that were previously considered too promiscuous to be useful. If two carbon radicals can be generated from the most ordinary functional groups and then sorted selectively into a single cross-coupled product under mild conditions, the retrosynthetic imagination of chemists expands considerably: complex molecules could be conceived as combinations of simple carboxylic acid, alcohol or aldehyde fragments, joined where needed by a photon, an electron and a pair of cheap metal catalysts. The Harbin team&#8217;s data, including raw NMR, cyclic voltammetry and EPR datasets deposited openly on Zenodo, will allow other groups to scrutinize and build upon the mechanism. What remains to be seen is how far the platform can stretch — whether it can be rendered enantioselective, extended to heteroatom-bearing fragments, and scaled from milligram demonstrations to the gram and kilogram quantities that industrial synthesis demands. For now, the message is clear: the once-chaotic world of radical coupling is being brought under disciplined control, one photon and one electron at a time.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Photoelectrochemical C(sp3)–C(sp3) radical cross-coupling of native functional groups using iron–nickel dual catalysis</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Photoelectrochemical C(sp3)–C(sp3) cross-coupling using native functional groups</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Zhong, P.-F., Yang, C., Guo, L., &amp; Xia, W. (2026). Photoelectrochemical C(sp3)–C(sp3) cross-coupling using native functional groups. <em>Nature Synthesis</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s44160-026-01162-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s44160-026-01162-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s44160-026-01162-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s44160-026-01162-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> photoelectrochemistry, cross-coupling, C(sp3)–C(sp3) bonds, radical sorting, nickel catalysis, iron catalysis, ligand-to-metal charge transfer, decarboxylation, SH2 mechanism, electrocatalysis, photocatalysis, organic synthesis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">227039</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
