<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>data quality in climate science &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/data-quality-in-climate-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 05:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>China&#8217;s climate record gets a 60-year cleanup as scientists scrub hidden biases from the data</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/chinas-climate-record-gets-a-60-year-cleanup-as-scientists-scrub-hidden-biases-from-the-data/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell Cooper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 05:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Athmospheric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China climate dataset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate bias correction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change detection in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate data homogenization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate dataset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate research transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data quality in climate science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERA5-Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historical climate analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homogenization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homogenized climate datasets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term climate records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meteorological station data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meteorological stations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peking University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reanalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reanalysis climate data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relative humidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science China Earth Sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban and environmental climate studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urbanization]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=243399</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A Peking University team has released HCD01, a homogenized daily gridded climate dataset for China covering 1961 to 2022, after correcting non-climatic biases in station observations and merging them with ERA5-Land reanalysis.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you measure the climate of a country when the rulers keep changing? That deceptively simple question sits at the heart of one of the most persistent problems in climate science, and it is the problem a research team led by Professor Kaicun Wang of the College of Urban and Environmental Sciences at Peking University has now tackled head-on for China. In a paper published in Science China Earth Sciences, the team describes the construction of a Homogenized Gridded Climate Dataset for China, known as HCD01, and has simultaneously released it publicly through the National Tibetan Plateau Data Center. The dataset delivers daily climate information at a spatial resolution of 0.1 degrees, covering the period from 1961 to 2022, and it is built from homogenized raw observations at roughly 2,400 national meteorological stations combined with reanalysis data. For anyone studying how China&#8217;s climate has shifted over more than six decades, this is the most carefully cleaned foundation yet.</p>
<p>The reason such an effort is needed lies in the nature of the observing network itself. Surface meteorological stations are the workhorses of climate-change detection, attribution, and impact studies, and they also serve as the yardsticks against which satellite remote-sensing retrievals and climate model simulations are evaluated. But these stations are not pristine instruments floating above history. Observing instruments are continuously upgraded and replaced, and different instruments carry different biases. When a thermometer design changes or a humidity sensor is swapped for a newer model, the recorded values can shift for reasons that have nothing to do with the atmosphere. These artificial changes, known as inhomogeneities, contaminate the very records scientists rely on to detect long-term climate signals.</p>
<p>In principle, observational data are expected to represent large-scale climate-change signals on the order of 100 kilometers or more. Yet changes in the local environment surrounding a station, most notably urbanization, can be superimposed on those large-scale signals. To accurately detect and attribute climate change, the effects of non-climatic factors and local environmental changes must be removed as much as possible. Some of these effects are comparatively easy to handle. Abrupt changes caused by station relocations and instrument replacements tend to be large and can usually be detected and corrected through conventional homogenization techniques. The harder problem is the slow one: changes in the observing environment around a station are often gradual, and each individual change has only a small effect on the observations, making it extremely difficult to identify and correct. Over decades, however, these small effects accumulate into systematic biases that can significantly distort estimates of climate-change trends and even undermine the reliability of detection and attribution studies.</p>
<p>Traditional homogenization methods generally rely on comparisons with neighboring stations. A set of reference stations with similar elevation and reliable data quality is selected around a target station, and possible inhomogeneities are identified by comparing their time series. The logic is sound when the neighbors are clean. But when many stations in a region are simultaneously affected by instrument sensitivity drift, instrument replacement, urbanization, and other factors, the reference stations themselves may contain inhomogeneities. In that case, the method can miss the very signals it is designed to find, and its ability to detect both gradual and abrupt inhomogeneities becomes limited. This is precisely the situation across much of China, where the national station network has undergone sweeping technological and environmental change over the past sixty years.</p>
<p>To break this deadlock, Wang&#8217;s team spent more than a decade developing a homogenization method based on same-station comparison. Instead of leaning on neighboring stations that may share the same hidden biases, the approach overcomes key difficulties in detecting and correcting gradual inhomogeneities, and it enables the detection and correction of both gradual and abrupt inhomogeneities in China&#8217;s land-surface climate observations. The variables it covers are the essential ones for climate monitoring: surface solar radiation, wind speed, relative humidity, air temperature, ground temperature, and precipitation. The method provides the technical backbone for building high-quality climate datasets for China, and HCD01 is the first major product of that backbone.</p>
<p>The corrections the team uncovered are striking, and they change how several well-known features of China&#8217;s climate record should be interpreted. Before 1990, strict calibration instruments and procedures were lacking, and gradual inhomogeneity caused by instrument sensitivity drift crept into China&#8217;s surface solar radiation observations. The consequence is significant: the widely reported decreasing trend in surface solar radiation during 1960 to 1990 was seriously overestimated. Then, during 1990 to 1993, instrument updates caused a sudden increase in the observations, an artificial step that had nothing to do with the sun or the clouds. In other words, part of the famous global dimming and brightening story as recorded over China was an artifact of the instruments rather than the atmosphere.</p>
<p>The twenty-first century brought a different kind of discontinuity. China&#8217;s meteorological observations began shifting from manual to automatic observation, and the greatest impact fell on relative humidity. Under conditions of low near-surface wind speed, the dry- and wet-bulb thermometers used in manual observations tended to overestimate relative humidity, whereas the capacitive sensors used in automatic observations did not have this problem. The transition between the two methods therefore produced a false decreasing trend in relative humidity observations in the twenty-first century, a trend that reflects changing hardware rather than a drying atmosphere. Correcting this bias matters enormously, because relative humidity feeds directly into calculations of evaporation, heat stress, and the behavior of the hydrological cycle.</p>
<p>Urbanization left its own fingerprints on the record. The growth of cities around meteorological stations amplified the observed warming trend of daily minimum temperature, since urban surfaces store and release heat differently than the rural landscapes that once surrounded the stations. Urbanization also increased surface roughness, which reduced near-surface wind speed as measured at those sites. Meanwhile, relocations of meteorological stations from urban to rural areas caused abrupt increases in observed wind speed, the opposite artifact. The team notes that although the decline in station-observed near-surface wind speed does not represent large-scale change, it does reflect real changes in near-surface wind speed at the observing sites themselves, and it affects station precipitation observations, since wind influences how effectively rain gauges catch falling precipitation.</p>
<p>Cleaning the station records, however, is only half the battle. Homogenized station observations alone remain insufficient for climate-change research because observing stations are sparse and unevenly distributed across China, and because observation periods differ among stations. That makes direct spatiotemporal analysis at the national scale difficult. To solve this, the team merged the homogenized station observations with ERA5-Land reanalysis data to construct HCD01, providing complete spatial coverage at a daily, 0.1-degree resolution for 1961 through 2022. The results show that HCD01 clearly improves the representation of long-term trends compared with both reanalysis data alone and raw observations, offering a high-quality data basis for studies of regional climate change and its impacts across China.</p>
<p>The study was led by Professor Kaicun Wang, who served as first author and corresponding author. The research team included current graduate students Hongze Cai, Yun Li, Hanmeng Xia, and Changjian Yin from Wang&#8217;s group, along with former graduate students including Professor Chunlue Zhou and Associate Professor Yanyi He, both of Sun Yat-sen University, Young Researcher Zhengtai Zhang of Lanzhou University, and Dr. Runze Zhao of the National Satellite Meteorological Center of the China Meteorological Administration. The work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China and the Science and Technology Program of Guizhou Province. With HCD01 now openly available, researchers studying everything from agricultural water demand to solar energy potential in China have access to a climate record in which the instruments, the cities, and the station moves have been carefully accounted for, leaving the climate signal standing on its own.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Homogenization of Chinese meteorological station records and construction of a gridded climate dataset</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Peking University team releases homogenized gridded climate dataset for China</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Peking University team releases homogenized gridded climate dataset for China. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1141765" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> climate dataset, homogenization, China, meteorological stations, solar radiation, relative humidity, urbanization, ERA5-Land, reanalysis, climate change detection, Peking University, Science China Earth Sciences</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">243399</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
