The study, published in the Journal of Materials Science by Mahdieh Sabbaghian and Mohammad Zaman Kabir, focuses on a copper-aluminum-manganese alloy with a composition of 15.8 percent aluminum and 11 percent manganese by atomic fraction. Copper-based shape memory alloys have attracted attention for decades precisely because their raw materials are cheap and abundant compared with nickel and titanium. Yet they have historically suffered from a critical weakness: in polycrystalline form, meaning materials made of many small crystals rather than a single crystal, they tend to crack along grain boundaries during repeated elastic cycling. The intergranular brittleness has been the Achilles heel that kept them confined to laboratory curiosities and niche applications.

The Iranian team approached this challenge through the lens of thermomechanical processing, the art and science of combining heat treatment with mechanical deformation to sculpt a material’s internal structure. They compared several processing routes applied to the same base alloy: hot rolling followed by quenching, conventional annealing, and a more exotic procedure called cyclic heat treatment, in which the material is repeatedly heated and cooled through a critical temperature range. Each route leaves a distinct fingerprint on the microstructure, and the researchers set out to map exactly how those fingerprints translate into functional performance.

Characterization was carried out with an impressive battery of techniques. Differential scanning calorimetry measured the temperatures at which the alloy transforms between its high-temperature austenite phase and its low-temperature martensite phase, the reversible crystallographic shift that underpins all shape memory behavior. X-ray diffraction identified the phases present, while optical and scanning electron microscopy revealed the grain structures, and microhardness testing probed local mechanical resistance. Superelasticity itself was evaluated through cyclic tensile testing, in which specimens are stretched and unloaded repeatedly while stress-strain curves are recorded, and the shape memory effect was assessed through bending recovery experiments in which pre-strained samples are heated and their recovery angle measured.

The physics here deserves a moment of explanation. Superelasticity is not ordinary elasticity. In a superelastic alloy, applying stress at a temperature above the austenite finish temperature triggers a stress-induced transformation from austenite to martensite. The material yields at a nearly constant stress plateau as the transformation proceeds, absorbing enormous strain, sometimes several percent, which would permanently deform an ordinary metal. When the load is removed, the martensite becomes unstable and reverts to austenite, and the material snaps back almost completely. The catch is that this reversible transformation must sweep through entire grains without generating damaging stress concentrations at grain boundaries. Large grains, and ideally single crystals, make this far easier, which is why grain size control is the central battleground for polycrystalline shape memory alloys.

This is where cyclic heat treatment enters the story, and it is the most striking part of the new work. The technique, pioneered by researchers including Takashi Omori and Ryosuke Kainuma at Tohoku University, exploits a phenomenon called abnormal grain growth. Under normal circumstances, heating a metal causes its grains to grow uniformly and modestly. But under specific cyclic conditions, a select few grains develop a growth advantage, consuming their neighbors until they dominate the entire microstructure. The result can be grains centimeters long, effectively transforming a polycrystal into an oligocrystal or even a single crystal without any of the expensive directional solidification or crystal-pulling methods traditionally required. The mechanism is thought to involve the repeated dissolution and reprecipitation of phases during each thermal cycle, which selectively favors grains with particular orientations or defect structures.

Applying cyclic heat treatment to their Cu-Al-Mn alloy, the researchers achieved dramatic results. Differential scanning calorimetry of the treated specimens revealed austenite finish temperatures below zero degrees Celsius, a crucial finding because it means the alloy is fully austenitic, and therefore superelastic, at room temperature. Cyclic tensile testing then showed that the cyclically heat treated material exhibited pronounced superelasticity, with a recoverable strain of 6.24 percent, more than five times that of the untreated control specimen. For a polycrystalline copper-based alloy, that is an extraordinary figure, and it demonstrates that the abnormal grain growth strategy transfers effectively from the iron-manganese-aluminum-nickel systems where it was first demonstrated to the copper-based family.

Hot rolling, meanwhile, delivered a different but complementary set of benefits. The rolled specimens showed ultimate tensile strength and cumulative energy density to fracture increased by approximately 74 percent and 39 percent respectively compared with the control. Rolling refines the microstructure, breaks up casting defects, and can introduce beneficial texture, aligning the crystallographic grains in ways that accommodate the transformation strain more gracefully. The most exciting result, however, came from combining the two processes. A route that paired hot rolling with cyclic heat treatment promoted pronounced abnormal grain growth while simultaneously enhancing strength, ductility, and superelasticity, yielding an ultimate tensile strength of up to 572 megapascals, a total strain at fracture of up to 15.4 percent, and a recoverable superelastic strain of up to 6.86 percent. Achieving all three properties together is rare; usually improving one comes at the expense of another.

The implications extend well beyond the laboratory. Shape memory alloys are increasingly specified in civil infrastructure, where their superelasticity allows them to absorb seismic energy and re-center structures after earthquakes, and where their shape memory effect lets them apply permanent prestressing forces to concrete elements as they are heated. Reviews of the field have highlighted applications ranging from bridge shear reinforcement to column retrofitting and vibration damping systems. In these large-scale structural uses, the cost of nickel-titanium is often prohibitive, since tonnage quantities would be required. A copper-based alternative with competitive functional properties, produced from inexpensive raw materials through conventional rolling and furnace treatments, could change the economics of resilient infrastructure design entirely.

There are, of course, questions that future work must address. Cyclic heat treatment schedules can be time-consuming, and scaling the abnormal grain growth process from laboratory coupons to commercial bar and plate stock will demand careful process control. Fatigue behavior over thousands of superelastic cycles, corrosion resistance in realistic environments, and compatibility with welding and joining methods all remain to be fully characterized for the processed alloy. Still, the demonstration that a simple combination of rolling and thermal cycling can coax a cheap copper alloy into delivering nearly seven percent recoverable strain alongside 572 megapascals of strength marks a genuine advance. It suggests that the era of superelastic metals may not belong exclusively to nickel and titanium after all, and that with clever processing, some of the oldest and most familiar metals in human history still have remarkable new tricks to teach us.

Subject of Research: Thermomechanical processing and cyclic heat treatment of Cu–Al–Mn shape memory alloys to enhance superelasticity

Article Title: Adapting superelasticity in Cu–Al–Mn shape memory alloys via thermomechanical processing and cyclic heat treatment

Article References: Sabbaghian, M., & Kabir, M. Z. (2026). Adapting superelasticity in Cu–Al–Mn shape memory alloys via thermomechanical processing and cyclic heat treatment. Journal of Materials Science, 61(43), 34049-34087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-026-13738-0

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-026-13738-0

Keywords: shape memory alloys, superelasticity, Cu–Al–Mn, cyclic heat treatment, abnormal grain growth, thermomechanical processing, hot rolling, martensitic transformation, grain size, structural materials, seismic resilience, Journal of Materials Science