<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cunninghamia lanceolata &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/cunninghamia-lanceolata/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 08:30:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Drought Dimmed the Canopy: Subtropical Trees Absorb Less Light as Soils Dry</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/drought-dimmed-the-canopy-subtropical-trees-absorb-less-light-as-soils-dry/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gavin Prescott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 08:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Castanopsis carlesii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cunninghamia lanceolata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought impact on leaf light absorption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought-induced changes in plant canopy function]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological strategies of subtropical trees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of soil dryness on plant optical properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experimental study on drought effects in subtropical forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest productivity models and water availability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaf light absorptance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaf spectroscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaf water content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light absorption variability in trees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photosynthetically active radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant adaptation to climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant water stress effects on photosynthesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of leaf optical properties in ecosystem carbon cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPAD index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specific leaf area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spectral analysis of drought-stressed leaves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spectral indices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subtropical tree species response to drought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subtropical trees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warming]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=252817</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A controlled experiment on three subtropical tree species shows that drought steadily reduces leaf light absorptance below the standard 85 percent assumption, with structure-sensitive spectral indices outperforming conventional chlorophyll measures under water stress.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For decades, plant scientists have made a deceptively simple assumption: that a healthy green leaf absorbs roughly 85 percent of the photosynthetically active radiation striking its surface. That single number, applied across ecosystems from boreal forests to tropical plantations, sits quietly inside nearly every model of global carbon uptake. A new study published in BMC Plant Biology now shows that this convenient constant can quietly collapse when trees run out of water. Researchers at Fujian Normal University in Fuzhou, China, grew potted seedlings of three functionally distinct subtropical tree species under ambient conditions, simulated warming, and drought, and tracked how the leaves&#8217; ability to absorb light changed week by week across a spectrum stretching from 350 to 2500 nanometers. What they found challenges the fixed 85 percent figure at the heart of productivity models and reveals a hidden optical dimension to drought stress.</p>
<p>The three species at the center of the experiment were chosen to represent contrasting ecological strategies in China&#8217;s humid subtropics. Castanopsis carlesii is a shade-tolerant, broad-leaved evergreen typical of mature forests; Schima superba is a fast-growing pioneer broadleaf often planted in restoration projects; and Cunninghamia lanceolata, Chinese fir, is a commercially vital conifer that dominates vast timber plantations across southern China. Because these species differ in leaf anatomy, longevity, and drought tolerance, they offered the team a rigorous test of whether light absorptance responds to environmental stress in a species-specific way or follows a more universal pattern. The answer, it turns out, is a bit of both, and the details matter for anyone trying to predict how subtropical forests will fare as climates warm and dry.</p>
<p>The core measurement in the study was leaf light absorptance, symbolized by the Greek letter alpha, which quantifies the fraction of incoming solar radiation a leaf actually absorbs rather than reflects or transmits. In the photosynthetically active radiation band, the 400 to 700 nanometer window that chlorophyll and accessory pigments harvest to power photosynthesis, absorptance determines how much energy is available for carbon fixation. It also governs the leaf&#8217;s energy balance, since absorbed radiation that is not used in photosynthesis must be dissipated as heat. The researchers measured absorptance not only in the visible range but across the entire shortwave spectrum, including the near-infrared region between 700 and 2500 nanometers, where leaf structure rather than pigments dominates optical behavior. This full-spectrum approach allowed them to disentangle pigment-driven changes from structural ones.</p>
<p>The headline result is strikingly consistent: across all three species, absorptance in the photosynthetically active radiation band declined continuously as drought progressed. The decline crossed the critical 85 percent threshold at slightly different times for each species. Castanopsis carlesii fell below the conventional constant after three weeks of drought, while both Cunninghamia lanceolata and Schima superba held out for four weeks before dropping under it. This gradual dimming of the canopy means that drought-stressed forests are not just closing their stomata and slowing their biochemistry; they are physically absorbing less of the sunlight that models assume they capture. In a region where seasonal droughts are projected to intensify, such an optical shift could translate into meaningful overestimates of carbon uptake if the 85 percent assumption is left uncorrected.</p>
<p>Warming, by contrast, produced a more nuanced and species-specific signal. In Castanopsis carlesii, leaves exposed to simulated warming showed slower reductions in near-infrared absorptance during drought than their counterparts grown at ambient temperature. This suggests that elevated temperature may alter the pace at which leaf structure and water status change under water stress, potentially moderating some optical consequences of drought in this shade-tolerant broadleaf. The effect was not observed as a simple universal pattern across the other species, underscoring a recurring theme in plant ecophysiology: responses to combined global change factors are rarely uniform, and the identity of the species involved matters. For mixed subtropical forests, this means that the optical fingerprint of drought will vary with forest composition, complicating any attempt to scale from leaf to landscape using a single parameter.</p>
<p>To understand why absorptance falls during drought, the team connected their optical measurements to a suite of classical leaf traits, and here the species diverged in instructive ways. In Schima superba, variation in photosynthetic-band absorptance tracked the relative leaf chlorophyll content index, commonly measured with a SPAD meter, pointing to pigment degradation as the dominant mechanism. In Castanopsis carlesii, absorptance was instead associated with leaf water content and specific leaf area, implicating both hydration and the thinning or restructuring of the lamina. In Cunninghamia lanceolata, lamina thickness emerged as the key correlate, consistent with the conifer&#8217;s needle-like anatomy mediating how light interacts with internal tissues. Drought, in other words, reduces light absorption through two intertwined routes: altering the content of light-absorbing compounds such as chlorophyll, and physically reshaping leaf structure.</p>
<p>One of the study&#8217;s most practically consequential findings concerns the tools scientists use to estimate leaf properties remotely. The SPAD chlorophyll index, a staple of both field ecophysiology and precision agriculture, proved unreliable under drought conditions. Changes in leaf water content and leaf structure rendered the SPAD index ineffective for estimating absorptance once water stress set in, a caution for anyone extrapolating chlorophyll readings to photosynthetic capacity in drying ecosystems. The researchers therefore turned to the full reflectance spectrum for a better predictor. They tested normalized difference indices, the same mathematical family as the famous NDVI used in satellite remote sensing, but built from wavelength pairs sensitive to leaf structure rather than pigments alone.</p>
<p>The results of that spectral search were decisive. Normalized difference indices incorporating structure-sensitive wavelengths, such as the band centered near 565 nanometers, outperformed conventional spectral indices like the normalized difference vegetation index in predicting absorptance across all three species and all treatments. This is a meaningful advance for the growing field of leaf spectroscopy, which seeks to read plant physiology directly from patterns of reflected light. It implies that future remote sensing of drought-affected forests should weight structural and water-sensitive bands more heavily than vegetation indices built primarily around chlorophyll absorption. For satellite missions and drone-based hyperspectral surveys monitoring subtropical plantations, the study offers a concrete recipe for improving estimates of how much solar energy stressed canopies actually absorb.</p>
<p>The broader implications extend to the terrestrial biosphere models that forecast regional and global carbon budgets. If drought systematically pushes leaf absorptance below the standard 85 percent assumption, then photosynthesis estimates for water-stressed forests carry a built-in bias, one that grows as droughts lengthen. Incorporating dynamic absorptance, driven by measurable traits such as leaf water content, specific leaf area, and lamina thickness, would bring these models closer to reality. The species-specific timing of the decline below the threshold, three weeks for Castanopsis and four for the fir and Schima, even hints at how forest composition could modulate the magnitude of the bias. As climate change intensifies both warming and drying across the subtropics, this study reminds us that even the most basic constants in plant science deserve periodic scrutiny, and that a leaf&#8217;s color is only part of the story it tells about light.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effects of warming and drought on leaf light absorptance in three subtropical tree species</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Warming and drought effects on leaf light absorptance in three subtropical tree species</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Xie, X., Yuan, Z., Kang, H., Zhong, S., Miao, G., Wang, X., &amp; Gong, X. Y. (2026). Warming and drought effects on leaf light absorptance in three subtropical tree species. <em>BMC Plant Biology</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-026-09948-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-026-09948-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-026-09948-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s12870-026-09948-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> leaf light absorptance, drought, warming, subtropical trees, photosynthetically active radiation, leaf spectroscopy, SPAD index, spectral indices, leaf water content, specific leaf area, Castanopsis carlesii, Cunninghamia lanceolata</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">252817</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simple Quadratic Model Best Predicts Tree Height in Chinese Fir Plantations of Southern Jiangxi</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/simple-quadratic-model-best-predicts-tree-height-in-chinese-fir-plantations-of-southern-jiangxi/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Porter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 12:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application of mathematical models in forestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomass and carbon stock prediction in Chinese forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese fir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese fir height-diameter relationship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cunninghamia lanceolata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological diversity in Chinese fir plantations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest canopy understory diversity in Chinese plantations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest measurement techniques in Chinese timber plantations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest modeling in southern Jiangxi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[height-diameter model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mantel test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-access forest science studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plantation forestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quadratic model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small-scale ecological statistics in forest research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[southern Jiangxi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[species diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subtropical forest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable forest management in Jiangxi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timber volume estimation models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tree height prediction in Chinese forestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[understory vegetation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=194183</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study of 910 Chinese fir trees in southern Jiangxi identifies the Quadratic model as the best height-diameter predictor while documenting 74 understory plant species across stand ages.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deep in the mountainous hinterland of southern Jiangxi Province, China, the rolling hills of Ganxian District are blanketed with one of the country&#8217;s most economically and ecologically important timber species: Chinese fir, <i>Cunninghamia lanceolata</i>. A new open-access study published in <i>Discover Forests</i> has now combined two strands of forest science that are rarely examined together, testing nine mathematical models of the relationship between tree height and trunk diameter while simultaneously cataloguing the hidden diversity of shrubs and herbs growing beneath the plantation canopy. The results offer both a practical tool for foresters and a candid lesson in the limits of small-scale ecological statistics.</p>
<p>The height-diameter relationship is one of the foundational equations of forest science. Measuring the diameter at breast height, or DBH, is quick and cheap; climbing or using instruments to measure total tree height is laborious and expensive. Because height is essential for estimating timber volume, biomass and carbon stocks, foresters rely on models that predict height from diameter. The research team, led by Yan Lu and Huiping Zeng of Southwest Forestry University together with colleagues at Ningxia University, measured 910 Chinese fir trees across nine 20-meter-by-20-meter plots, spanning young stands of eight years, middle-aged stands of seventeen years and mature stands of twenty-five years.</p>
<p>Nine candidate growth functions were fitted to the data, ranging from simple linear and power equations to the Korf, Michaelis-Menten, exponential and mixed models. The 910 trees were split by stratified random sampling into a calibration set of 728 trees and an internal validation set of 182 trees, with performance judged on the coefficient of determination, root mean square error, mean absolute error and the Akaike information criterion. The Quadratic model emerged as the overall winner, achieving the highest R-squared value of 0.6429 in validation, with root mean square errors between 2.39 and 2.43 meters and mean absolute errors between roughly 1.90 and 1.92 meters. The Mixed and Exponential models followed closely behind.</p>
<p>The authors are refreshingly honest about what those numbers mean. An R-squared near 0.5 during calibration indicates that diameter alone explains only about half of the variation in tree height, a level of noise that reflects microsite variability, competition and management history in these dense plantations. For individual trees, prediction uncertainty of around 2.4 meters is considerable. Yet for stand-level applications, estimating mean height, approximating timber volume and conducting large-scale inventories, the Quadratic model provides a useful, economical alternative to direct height measurement. Notably, the best-performing models diverge from earlier Chinese fir studies in Fujian and southeastern China that favored Richards-type or nonlinear mixed-effects models, a difference the researchers attribute to the distinctive soils, climate and growth conditions of the southern Jiangxi mountains.</p>
<p>Beneath the uniform fir canopy, the team documented a surprisingly rich hidden world. Across the nine plots, the understory contained 74 plant species belonging to 64 genera and 43 families, split evenly between 37 shrub species and 37 herbaceous species. The spreading fern <i>Dicranopteris pedata</i> proved to be the most ubiquitous companion, appearing across all stand ages, while dominant species shifted with forest age, from <i>Myrsine africana</i> and <i>Smilax glabra</i> in young stands to <i>Rubus corchorifolius</i> and <i>Gardenia jasminoides</i> in middle-aged ones.</p>
<p>Diversity indices told a nuanced story. Species richness declined gradually with stand age, with young forests holding the most species and mature forests the fewest, a pattern consistent with previous findings in pine and rubber plantations. Species diversity, measured by the Simpson and Shannon-Wiener indices, peaked numerically in middle-aged stands, while evenness was highest in mature stands. The shrub layer consistently showed higher diversity and evenness values than the herb layer. Floristic analysis revealed a strong tropical signature: the 43 families fell into seven distribution types and the 64 genera into thirteen, with tropical elements accounting for nearly 58 percent of genera, and clustering analysis showed that plants from similar or adjacent biogeographic regions tended to group together, hinting at deep phylogeographic roots in this subtropical flora.</p>
<p>The most provocative part of the study is its use of Mantel correlation tests to link tree growth with understory diversity. The tests showed that tree height and DBH were mostly insignificantly and negatively correlated with understory diversity indices, though both were positively associated with the Simpson evenness index. The researchers interpret this cautiously: the growth of dominant fir individuals may primarily affect how evenly resources are allocated among understory plants rather than the total number of species present, with a few shade-tolerant species thriving under larger trees while light-loving herbs decline. Among the diversity indices themselves, significant differentiated association patterns emerged, including a significant positive link between the Shannon-Wiener and Pielou evenness indices and a significant negative link between species richness and evenness.</p>
<p>Crucially, the team refuses to overclaim. With only nine plots, three per age class, and topographic factors partially confounded with stand age, the statistical power was limited and causal inference impossible. The authors explicitly frame all results, from the model rankings to the correlation analyses, as exploratory and descriptive, intended for hypothesis generation rather than definitive conclusions. This kind of methodological transparency is increasingly valued in ecology, where small-sample studies often generate headlines that later fail to replicate.</p>
<p>The practical implications remain substantial. As China pushes forward with carbon-neutral forestry initiatives, accurate growth models for Chinese fir are essential for monitoring timber production, estimating yields and planning ecological services. The study suggests that the Quadratic model, with its stable and interpretable parameters, is the most suitable local tool, while cautioning against extrapolation beyond the observed diameter range of 3.3 to 29.1 centimeters. Future work, the authors argue, should expand sampling across broader environmental gradients and incorporate site-specific covariates such as soil properties, light availability and management history to sharpen both the models and the ecological inferences they support.</p>
<p>For now, the study stands as a model of careful, self-aware field science: a modest dataset, honestly analyzed, that maps the growth equations of one of China&#8217;s most planted trees while revealing a floristically rich and historically layered understory beneath its shadows. It reminds foresters and ecologists alike that even in intensively managed monocultures, biodiversity persists, and that the relationship between the giants above and the small plants below is subtler than any single correlation coefficient can capture.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Height-diameter modeling and understory vegetation diversity of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations in southern Jiangxi, China</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Height-diameter models and understory vegetation diversity analysis of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations in the mountainous areas of Southern Jiangxi, China</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Lu, Y., Zeng, H., Li, X., Long, Q., Shen, Q., &amp; Dong, Q. (2026). Height-diameter models and understory vegetation diversity analysis of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations in the mountainous areas of Southern Jiangxi, China. <em>Discover Forests, 2</em>(1), Article 66. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44415-026-00127-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44415-026-00127-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44415-026-00127-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44415-026-00127-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Cunninghamia lanceolata, Chinese fir, height-diameter model, plantation forestry, understory vegetation, species diversity, Mantel test, southern Jiangxi, forest ecology, Quadratic model, biodiversity, subtropical forest</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">194183</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
