<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cryptosporidium &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/cryptosporidium/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 04:23:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Molecular survey finds widespread Cryptosporidium and limited Giardia in Victorian pigs</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/molecular-survey-finds-widespread-cryptosporidium-and-limited-giardia-in-victorian-pigs/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 04:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-sectional study of pig farm parasitology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptosporidium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptosporidium prevalence in Victorian pigs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptosporidium species diversity in pigs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptosporidium subtypes with human connection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic diversity of Cryptosporidium in pigs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giardia duodenalis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giardia duodenalis limited prevalence in pigs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular detection of enteric protozoa in livestock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular epidemiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular survey of pig parasites in Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasite surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCR-based detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pig parasites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pigs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health implications of zoonotic protozoa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victorian agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weaner pigs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoonotic potential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoonotic potential of Cryptosporidium and Giardia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=327042</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A survey of 626 pig faecal samples from 37 Victorian farms found Cryptosporidium in 51.1% of samples and Giardia duodenalis in 1.1%, including two Cryptosporidium subtypes previously identified in humans.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A molecular survey of pigs across 37 farms in Victoria, Australia, found Cryptosporidium in 51.1% of faecal samples and Giardia duodenalis in 1.1%, establishing the first molecular baseline for these enteric protozoa in the state. Cryptosporidium occurred on 28 of the 37 farms surveyed, while G. duodenalis was detected on three. The study also identified two Cryptosporidium subtypes previously recorded in humans, indicating that some parasite genotypes circulating in Victorian pigs have zoonotic potential.</p>
<p>Researchers collected 626 faecal samples representing multiple age groups from farms across Victoria. They used nested polymerase chain reaction assays targeting the small-subunit nuclear ribosomal RNA gene for Cryptosporidium and the tpi locus for G. duodenalis, then amplified the gp60 locus to characterise Cryptosporidium subtypes. Amplified products were analysed by Sanger sequencing. The cross-sectional survey estimated parasite prevalence and examined species composition and genetic diversity within the sampled pig population.</p>
<p>Cryptosporidium detections were dominated by two species. C. scrofarum accounted for 77.5% of Cryptosporidium-positive samples and C. suis for 18.4%. DNA from a third species, C. ubiquitum, was detected in three samples, all from a single farm. Subtyping identified the C. suis subtype XXVa-1 and the C. ubiquitum subtype XIIa; both have previously been identified in humans. This does not demonstrate transmission from pigs to people, but it shows that genotypes of public-health interest are present in the surveyed production environment.</p>
<p>By contrast, G. duodenalis was uncommon: seven of 626 samples were positive, corresponding to a prevalence of 1.1%. The infections occurred on three farms and comprised five samples with assemblage E and two with assemblage A. These findings describe low detected prevalence in this sample rather than establishing the parasite’s distribution throughout Victoria. Cryptosporidium prevalence, however, varied markedly among age groups and production systems, reaching 68.6% among weaners and 78.2% on semi-intensive farms, while it was absent from adult pigs.</p>
<p>The results show that Cryptosporidium is widespread across the Victorian pig farms included in the study, with detection in more than three-quarters of participating properties. The authors describe the work as the first molecular assessment of Cryptosporidium and G. duodenalis in pigs from Victoria and call for continued surveillance and targeted parasite management in Australian pig production. The geographic scope remains important: the estimates are based on 626 samples from 37 farms, and the absence of G. duodenalis outside three sampled farms should not be interpreted as proof that it is absent from other farms. Nevertheless, the baseline identifies frequent Cryptosporidium occurrence, limited detected G. duodenalis infection and zoonotically relevant Cryptosporidium genotypes in the state’s pig population.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Molecular prevalence and genetic diversity of Cryptosporidium and Giardia duodenalis in pigs from Victoria, Australia</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> First molecular survey of pigs in Victoria, Australia, reveals widespread Cryptosporidium infection, limited Giardia duodenalis occurrence and genotypes with zoonotic potential</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Xu, J., Abbas, G., Gauci, C. G., Gasser, R. B., Jabbar, A., &amp; Koehler, A. V. (2026). First molecular survey of pigs in Victoria, Australia, reveals widespread Cryptosporidium infection, limited Giardia duodenalis occurrence and genotypes with zoonotic potential. <em>Parasites &amp; Vectors</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-026-07739-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-026-07739-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-026-07739-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s13071-026-07739-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Cryptosporidium, Giardia duodenalis, pig parasites, molecular epidemiology, zoonotic potential, Victorian agriculture, parasite surveillance, weaner pigs, First, molecular, survey, pigs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">327042</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Europe&#8217;s Pigs Carry a Hidden Parasite Load, Landmark Review Finds</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/europes-pigs-carry-a-hidden-parasite-load-landmark-review-finds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristina Jarvis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 03:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ascaris suum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balantioides coli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blastocystis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptosporidium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cystoisospora suis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diagnostic methods for pig parasites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic pig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enteric protist infections in pigs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European pig health monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European pig parasite prevalence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farm management impact on pig health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gastrointestinal parasites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gastrointestinal parasites in livestock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[host age and parasite infection in pigs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic pig farm parasite prevalence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outdoor vs indoor pig health risks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasite control challenges in pig production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasite load in intensive pig farming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systematic review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systematic review of pig parasitology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veterinary Epidemiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoonotic]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=292942</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A systematic review of 28 studies across 21 European countries finds gastrointestinal helminths and zoonotic enteric protists remain widely distributed in domestic pigs, with prevalence shaped by production system, host age, and diagnostic methodology.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>European pigs, even on the most modern intensive farms, remain widely infected with gastrointestinal parasites and enteric protists, according to a new systematic review published in Frontiers in Parasitology. A research team from the University of Life Sciences &#8220;King Mihai I&#8221; in Timisoara, Romania, led by Alesia Cioacă and Diana Hoffman, synthesized sixteen years of European evidence on the parasites that inhabit the guts of Sus scrofa domesticus, the domestic pig. Their conclusion is striking: despite decades of progress in production efficiency and animal health, parasitic infections remain endemic across the continent, shaped less by geography than by farm management, host age, and, crucially, the diagnostic methods used to detect them.</p>
<p>The review screened 1,655 records from PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect, covering publications from January 2010 to January 2026. After duplicate removal and rigorous title, abstract, and full-text screening, 28 studies conducted across 21 European countries made the final cut. Sample sizes ranged from 48 to 3,938 animals, drawn from intensive indoor units, outdoor systems, free-range and organic farms, and extensive household holdings. The team followed PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines, structured the evidence around a PICO framework, and appraised methodological quality with the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Fifteen studies scored as high quality and twelve as moderate; none were rated low.</p>
<p>Among helminths, three nematodes dominated the European picture: the large roundworm Ascaris suum, the whipworm Trichuris suis, and the nodular worm Oesophagostomum spp. Ascaris suum is transmitted when pigs swallow embryonated eggs from contaminated environments, and its migrating larvae can scar the liver and lungs while intestinal infections erode growth performance. Trichuris suis, which colonizes the caecum and colon, can trigger inflammation, diarrhoea, and anaemia at high burdens. Oesophagostomum dentatum and O. quadrispinulatum, strongyles whose larvae develop within the intestinal mucosa, provoke inflammatory nodules in the large intestine. None of these pig-adapted species are regarded as major zoonotic agents, though their full relevance to human infection remains incompletely characterized.</p>
<p>The prevalence data revealed dramatic variation. On two free-range farms in Romania, Ascaris suum infected 63.1 percent of fattening pigs and 34.1 percent of sows, while Trichuris suis reached 39 percent in fatteners. In Serbia, nearly half of pigs from individual keepers carried the roundworm. By contrast, on intensive farrow-to-finish farms in Greece, Ascaris prevalence was just 3.7 percent, and on conventional Swiss farms a mere 0.8 percent. Age emerged as a consistent pattern for Oesophagostomum: on Swedish indoor farms, prevalence climbed from 4 percent in post-weaning piglets to 40 percent in dry sows, and in Poland it reached 51.8 percent in sows overall, detected on 68.6 percent of the 70 farms investigated.</p>
<p>Management practices showed statistical associations with helminth infections in some populations. On German alternative farms with outdoor access, pasture access was linked to higher odds of infection with Ascaris suum and strongyles, while deep-litter and free-range systems raised the odds for strongyles and whipworm compared with shallow-litter housing. On intensive Italian fattening farms, larger farm size and all-in/all-out production were associated with lower nematode risk. Yet these associations were not universal: a Danish study of modern sow farms found no link between farm-level roundworm prevalence and housing system, farm size, or contact with faecal material. The authors caution that no single production system carries a uniform level of risk.</p>
<p>Molecular tools uncovered diversity invisible to conventional microscopy. Using ITS-2 nemabiome metabarcoding on German outdoor-reared pigs, researchers found Oesophagostomum dentatum accounting for 93.9 percent of the strongyle community, O. quadrispinulatum for 5.9 percent, and Globocephalus urosubulatus for 0.1 percent — the first record of this hookworm species in domestic pigs in Europe. These figures describe the relative composition of the nematode community rather than individual-level prevalence, a technical distinction that matters when interpreting the data.</p>
<p>Coccidia told a different story. Cystoisospora suis, the agent of neonatal piglet cystoisosporosis, damages the small-intestinal epithelium of suckling piglets, causing malabsorption and diarrhoea. Farm-level prevalence on conventional units ranged from 42.9 percent in Germany to 83.3 percent in Spain, with litter-level values spanning 11.5 to 78.2 percent. Where age categories were analysed separately, younger animals consistently carried the highest burdens: on Swedish indoor farms, prevalence fell from 20 percent in post-weaning piglets to 0.3 percent in fatteners, with the parasite absent from sows. Eimeria spp., by contrast, showed no consistent age pattern, flourishing in some free-range and outdoor populations while remaining low in others.</p>
<p>The enteric protists carried the greatest public-health weight. Balantioides coli, a ciliate for which pigs are the principal reservoir hosts, has well-documented zoonotic relevance, with human infection linked to exposure to porcine faecal material. Detection varied wildly by method: on Italian intensive farms, sedimentation found the parasite in 95.9 percent of a comparative subset, FLOTAC with zinc sulphate in 85.7 percent, but FLOTAC with sodium chloride in only 8.9 percent. Cryptosporidium spp. showed a similar method effect — in Denmark, metabarcoding detected the protists in 35 percent of pigs while real-time PCR found them in 92 percent of the same population. Molecular typing repeatedly identified Cryptosporidium suis and Cry. scrofarum, with the zoonotically relevant Cry. parvum reported in fewer investigations, including a single Czech isolate assigned to gp60 subtype IIaA16G1R1b.</p>
<p>Blastocystis sp. revealed rich subtype diversity, with ST5 dominating in pigs from Serbia, Slovakia, and Denmark, where ST1, ST3, ST5, and ST15 co-circulated in the same population, often as mixed infections. Entamoeba polecki ST1 and ST3, both reported in humans, were detected by metabarcoding in 75 percent of a Danish pig population. Giardia duodenalis appeared in only two Danish studies, with Assemblage E — typically animal-associated — dominating, though Assemblage A, of zoonotic relevance, was also found. The microsporidian Enterocytozoon bieneusi, genotyped through the ribosomal ITS region, occurred in 92 percent of a tested Danish subset and 22.6 percent of extensively raised Iberian pigs, harbouring genotypes including EbpA, which has also been reported in humans.</p>
<p>The authors stress that finding the same species, subtype, or genotype in pigs and humans does not by itself demonstrate direct zoonotic transmission; establishing shared cycles requires comparative molecular investigations across host species supported by epidemiological data. Their synthesis nonetheless underlines the One Health imperative: pigs sit at a critical interface between animals, people, and the environment, capable of contaminating soil, water, and food chains. The review also flags uneven geographical coverage and substantial methodological heterogeneity — 13 studies used only conventional diagnostics, 4 only molecular approaches, and 11 combined both — as key limitations. The team calls for surveillance built on well-defined sampling strategies, comparable diagnostic methods, and molecular characterisation where relevant, so that the true parasite landscape of European pig production can finally be mapped with confidence.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> A systematic review of gastrointestinal parasites in Sus scrofa domesticus from Europe (2010 – 2026)</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> A systematic review of gastrointestinal parasites in Sus scrofa domesticus from Europe (2010 – 2026)</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Cioacă, A., Hoffman, D., Dreghiciu, I. C., Florea, T., Imre, M., Plesko, A., Oprescu, M., Oprescu, I., Dărăbuş, G., &amp; Ilie, M. S. (2026). A systematic review of gastrointestinal parasites in Sus scrofa domesticus from Europe (2010 – 2026). <em>Frontiers in Parasitology, 5</em>, Article 1950643. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpara.2026.1950643" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpara.2026.1950643</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpara.2026.1950643" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.3389/fpara.2026.1950643</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> domestic pig, gastrointestinal parasites, Ascaris suum, Cryptosporidium, Balantioides coli, Blastocystis, Cystoisospora suis, zoonotic, One Health, systematic review, Europe, veterinary epidemiology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">292942</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Storing Tap Water at Home May Undo the Promise of Safe Drinking Supplies</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/storing-tap-water-at-home-may-undo-the-promise-of-safe-drinking-supplies/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristina Jarvis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 20:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antimicrobial Resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antimicrobial resistance in stored drinking water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptosporidium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drinking water safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of intermittent water supply on public health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enteric pathogen presence in household water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enteric pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Escherichia coli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giardia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global water safety standards and classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[household water storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[household water storage contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of water storage containers on water safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[importance of household water management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intermittent water supply]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international water safety frameworks and limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozambique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLOS Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risks of human genetic material in stored water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rotavirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RT-qPCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe drinking water challenges in developing countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water quality monitoring in low-income regions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waterborne disease prevention in urban settings]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=271963</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A study in Beira, Mozambique, shows that household water storage and intermittent piped supply allow enteric pathogens, antimicrobial resistance markers, and parasites to contaminate drinking water even in systems officially classified as safely managed.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For hundreds of millions of people around the world, the moment water leaves a pipe is not the moment it becomes safe to drink. A new study from Beira, Mozambique, offers some of the most detailed evidence yet that the humble household storage container, a fixture of daily life wherever piped supply is intermittent, can quietly undo the protections that a well-run water system is supposed to provide. Researchers from the PAASIM Study Authorship Consortium, publishing in PLOS Water, found that stored drinking water in Beira homes carried enteric pathogens, antimicrobial resistance markers, and human genetic material far more often than water drawn directly from the household tap, even though the city&#8217;s supply is officially classified as safely managed.</p>
<p>The classification matters because it shapes how governments and donors spend billions of dollars. Under the monitoring framework used by international agencies, a safely managed drinking water service is one that is located on premises, available when needed, and free from contamination, at least as measured at the point of service. What happens after the water reaches the home has largely been invisible to that framework. In Beira, as in many cities across sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, piped water arrives intermittently, so families fill buckets, jerrycans, and other containers during the hours when supply flows and drink from them over the following hours or days. Each transfer and each hour of storage is an opportunity for contamination to enter, and for any pathogens already present to multiply.</p>
<p>To capture that hidden deterioration, the research team used large-volume sampling methods, a technique that concentrates water from much bigger volumes than a standard laboratory test would use. Rather than testing a few hundred milliliters, the researchers processed large samples and then screened the concentrates with reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction, or RT-qPCR, using a custom TaqMan Array Card. This platform allowed them to look simultaneously for a broad panel of targets: bacteria, protozoan parasites, viruses, helminths, antimicrobial resistance genes, and microbial source tracking markers that indicate whether contamination is of human or animal origin. The approach is far more sensitive than conventional culture-based testing, which often misses low-level contamination and cannot easily detect viruses or parasites.</p>
<p>The results were striking. Stored drinking water samples were more likely than household tap water samples to contain enteric pathogens, antimicrobial resistance targets, and human mitochondrial DNA, a genetic fingerprint suggesting that human waste had entered the water somewhere along the chain from pipe to cup. In other words, the very act of storing water at home, under the conditions typical of an intermittent supply system, was associated with a measurable decline in microbiological quality. The finding challenges the assumption that once water is delivered through an improved, on-premises connection, the remaining risks are negligible.</p>
<p>Equally important was what the team found in the piped supply itself. Enteric pathogens, including the protozoan parasites Cryptosporidium and Giardia, pathogenic strains of Escherichia coli, and rotavirus, were detected directly in 13 percent of the piped source samples, 11 out of 87, drawn from a system the researchers describe as well managed but intermittent. That figure is lower than the detection rates in stored water, but it is not zero, and it points to two distinct vulnerabilities. The first is the intermittent operation of the network itself: when pipes run dry, pressure drops, and contaminated groundwater or soil water can be drawn inward through joints and cracks, a phenomenon engineers call intrusion. The second is the household environment, where unclean containers, hands, and utensils can introduce fecal organisms into water that left the treatment plant clean.</p>
<p>The detection of protozoan parasites is particularly significant from a public health standpoint. Cryptosporidium and Giardia form tough, chlorine-resistant oocysts and cysts that survive standard disinfection far better than bacteria do. Their presence in piped water suggests that chlorine residual alone, the backbone of most municipal disinfection programs, cannot be relied upon to guarantee safety when the network is compromised by intermittent operation. Rotavirus, meanwhile, remains one of the leading causes of severe diarrheal disease in young children worldwide, and its detection in drinking water underscores that viral pathogens can move through municipal systems in ways that routine monitoring rarely catches.</p>
<p>The study&#8217;s setting gives its findings global weight. Beira, a port city of roughly half a million people, is representative of a vast middle ground in global water access: households that are connected to a real piped network, counted as safely served in international statistics, but whose water arrives unpredictably and must be stored. Nearly three-quarters of the world&#8217;s population now uses safely managed drinking water services according to official estimates, yet the Beira data suggest that the true picture at the point of consumption may be considerably worse than those numbers imply. If contamination between the tap and the mouth is common, then progress measured at the point of service overstates progress in health protection.</p>
<p>The researchers&#8217; conclusions point toward a combination of fixes rather than a single silver bullet. Continuity of service delivery is the first pillar: keeping pipes pressurized around the clock would reduce intrusion events and, over time, could reduce the need for household storage altogether. The second is effective filtration treatment within the piped supply, which matters because filtration, unlike chlorination, can physically remove the protozoan oocysts and other particles that resist disinfection. The third is safe storage practice at the household level, including narrow-mouthed containers with lids and taps that minimize hand contact with the water. Without all three, the authors warn, microbial contamination of drinking water at the point of use may continue to occur even in systems that look exemplary on paper.</p>
<p>For policymakers, the study is a reminder that water safety is a chain, and that the weakest link is often the least monitored one. Household water treatment and safe storage have long been championed in public health circles, but they have struggled to attract the infrastructure investment that piped systems command, partly because global monitoring frameworks do not systematically measure what happens inside the home. Techniques like the large-volume sampling and multiplex molecular screening used in Beira could change that, by making the hidden segment of the water chain visible and by giving utilities and regulators a way to audit safety where it actually matters: in the glass of water a family drinks. As climate change intensifies pressure on urban water supplies and intermittency becomes more common even in well-resourced systems, the gap between safely managed on paper and safely consumed in practice is one that the world can no longer afford to ignore.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Microbial contamination of household-stored versus piped drinking water in an intermittently supplied urban water system in Mozambique</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Household water storage compromises drinking water safety in a “safely managed” system</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Linden, Y., Kowalsky, E., Zhu, K., Fagnant-Sperati, C., McGunegill, S., Cumbana, A., Mangamela, M., Nalá, R., Freeman, M. C., Levy, K., Brown, J., &amp; The PAASIM Study Authorship Consortium (2026). Household water storage compromises drinking water safety in a “safely managed” system. <em>PLOS Water, 5</em>(10), e0000523. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000523" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000523</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000523" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1371/journal.pwat.0000523</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> drinking water safety, household water storage, intermittent water supply, enteric pathogens, Cryptosporidium, Giardia, rotavirus, Escherichia coli, antimicrobial resistance, RT-qPCR, Mozambique, PLOS Water</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">271963</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Hidden Lives of Female Cryptosporidium Parasites</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/the-hidden-lives-of-female-cryptosporidium-parasites/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristina Jarvis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 05:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apicomplexa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[challenges in treating Cryptosporidium infections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptosporidium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptosporidium in immunocompromised hosts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptosporidium life cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptosporidium parasite biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptosporidium parvum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptosporidium research and vaccine development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptosporidium transmission and infection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diarrhoeal disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[female sexual stages in Cryptosporidium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gametogenesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global health impact of Cryptosporidium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meiosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neglected parasitic stages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oocyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oocyst development and infectious cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitophorous vacuole formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of female reproductive cells in parasite propagation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transmission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Forming Bodies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=266835</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new PLOS Pathogens review synthesises the unusual biology of female Cryptosporidium parasites, whose oocyst-building programme underpins transmission of a major diarrhoeal pathogen that still lacks effective drugs or vaccines.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cryptosporidium is one of the most consequential parasites in global health, a leading cause of diarrhoeal disease for which no fully effective drugs or vaccines exist. In otherwise healthy adults, infection causes self-limiting diarrhoea, but in young malnourished children and immunocompromised patients the disease can be severe, chronic and often fatal, contributing to wasting and growth stunting. The parasite infects a broad range of vertebrate hosts, and its complete life cycle unfolds within a single host, making both treatment and transmission control exceptionally difficult. Now, writing in PLOS Pathogens, researchers from the University of Dundee and Clemson University have synthesised what is known about one of the most neglected corners of this parasite&#8217;s biology: the female sexual stages, the cells that build the infectious oocyst and thereby drive every new infection.</p>
<p>The life cycle begins when a host ingests an oocyst, a resilient, wall-encased structure containing four sporozoites. In the gastrointestinal tract the oocyst excysts, releasing sporozoites that invade the epithelial cells lining the gut. Cryptosporidia are obligate intracellular parasites: they attach to the surface of a gut cell and pull the host membrane around themselves to form a parasitophorous vacuole, inside which they replicate. The sporozoite develops into a meront, duplicating its nucleus and organelles, and after roughly twelve hours divides into eight motile merozoites. These egress and invade neighbouring epithelial cells, repeating the asexual cycle. Remarkably, live-cell imaging of Cryptosporidium parvum infecting HCT-8 cells, together with single-cell RNA sequencing data from in vitro and in vivo infections, indicates that merozoites from the third round of asexual replication are committed directly to sexual development, apparently without a morphologically distinct type II meront of the kind described in other species such as C. muris and C. mortiferum.</p>
<p>Why and how the parasite commits to sexual stages after exactly three asexual rounds remains unknown. What is clear is that the committed merozoite invades a new epithelial cell and differentiates into either a macrogamont, which develops a single female gamete, or a microgamont, which produces sixteen male gametes. Mature males egress and seek out females, which never leave their host cell and instead mature intracellularly until fertilised. Fertilisation produces a zygote that undergoes meiosis, constructs the oocyst wall and completes sporogony to yield four haploid sporozoites within the protective shell. Because standard co-culture of C. parvum with HCT-8 cells does not support observation of fertilisation or subsequent zygote and oocyst development, sexual commitment, fertilisation, meiosis, sporogony and oocyst construction remain among the most mysterious phases of the life cycle.</p>
<p>Sexual commitment itself is mandatory for the third generation of merozoites and appears to be governed by an intrinsic, non-chromosomal mechanism. Live imaging has shown that merozoites from a single meront give rise to both sexes: of the eight merozoites in a meront, approximately two to three become male and the remaining five to six become female. This produces an excess of small, motile microgametes, presumably improving the odds that a female will be found and fertilised. One known player is the transcription factor Myb-M, expressed early in male development; experimental overexpression of Myb-M in C. parvum is sufficient to drive differentiation into males. No equivalent trigger for female commitment has been identified, leading the authors to suggest that female fate may be the default programme of sexual differentiation.</p>
<p>Female parasites, once committed, undertake one of the most demanding developmental programmes in the parasite&#8217;s repertoire. They carry a large nucleus, reflecting their status as the most transcriptionally and translationally active life cycle stage. Early in development, females express putative transporters, membrane proteins and secreted proteins hypothesised to mediate fertilisation, possibly facilitating male attachment and entry. Later, they mount two distinct waves of gene expression devoted to building the oocyst wall. The wall itself is a multilayered structure: an external glycocalyx, an outer layer of acid-fast lipids, and an inner layer of glycoproteins. These components are synthesised and stockpiled in female-exclusive organelles called Wall Forming Bodies, or WFBs, of which there are two subtypes distinguished by electron density. The prevailing hypothesis is that WFB Type I contents are secreted first to build the outer layer and WFB Type II contents follow to form the inner layer.</p>
<p>Only a handful of WFB components are confirmed. COWP1 is currently the only validated marker for WFB Type I, while COWP6 and COWP8 show punctate localisation in developing females, suggesting they also reside in these organelles. Transcriptomic and oocyst proteomic datasets have generated a comprehensive candidate list of WFB proteins, but how the organelles are synthesised, what exactly they contain, and how their secretion is regulated remain open questions. The single-cell atlas of C. parvum reveals that the first expression wave contains the Cryptosporidium Oocyst Wall Protein family and accessory enzymes such as proteases and protein modifiers for assembling the proteinaceous shell, while the second wave expresses glycosyltransferases and other secreted proteins including mucins and C-type lectins. These components are secreted into the space between the parasite plasma membrane and the host cell membrane, allowing the wall to be built while the parasite is still inside the gut cell. Having wall components ready just in time presumably keeps pace with the rapid turnover of epithelial host cells.</p>
<p>Females also provision their offspring. Genetic crosses using isolates tagged with different fluorescent proteins have shown that maternal cytoplasmic proteins persist in the sporozoites of first-generation progeny, including proteins involved in assembling dense granule organelles, which remodel the host cell after invasion. Females additionally express the proteins of the crystalloid body, a structure whose function is unknown but is likely involved in sporogony. Post-transcriptional control may be equally important: the maternal RNA-binding protein F-RBP, expressed in early females, binds female RNA transcripts, and conditional knockouts in vivo produce sterile sporozoites. F-RBP may therefore be essential for regulating maternally inherited RNA required to generate infectious sporozoites in the next generation.</p>
<p>Transcriptional regulation of female development is only beginning to be mapped. Two female-specific Apetala-2-type DNA-binding proteins have been identified: ApiAP2-1 is required for female differentiation, and ApiAP2-F is required for oocyst shedding. Insulinase-like protease 1 also contributes to female development and oocyst shedding. Intriguingly, females show reduced expression of ribosomal proteins, indicative of translational repression, and the authors hypothesise that epigenetic mechanisms such as chromatin remodelling may operate, consistent with the expansion of the female nucleus. Whatever the precise combination of mechanisms, they are fundamental to completing the life cycle and represent attractive targets for intervention.</p>
<p>What happens after fertilisation is even less understood. Fertilisation is presumed to trigger oocyst wall formation, sporogony and meiosis, but no culture system permits direct observation, so the signals regulating post-fertilisation development remain unknown across the coccidia. In Cryptosporidium, meiotic divisions appear to precede and partially overlap with deposition of the oocyst wall. Genes related to meiosis and DNA repair are expressed by females, including the DNA meiotic recombinase DMC1, detected in female nuclei. Under experimental conditions, C. parvum chromosomes show Mendelian inheritance with high frequencies of meiotic recombination, and frequent sex between genetically distinct parasites could accelerate the evolution and spread of traits such as virulence or drug resistance, as suggested by clofazimine resistance observed between C. parvum subtypes. Unlike other apicomplexans, Cryptosporidium oocysts are shed fully sporulated and immediately infectious, ready either to be excreted into the environment or to excyst in situ and reinfect the current host, a process that underpins the chronic disease seen in vulnerable patients.</p>
<p>A long-standing model proposes two oocyst types: thin-walled oocysts that excyst within the host to drive autoinfection, and thick-walled oocysts that are excreted and transmitted. The evidence for thin-walled oocysts rests on a few electron micrographs, and single-cell data show no transcriptional signature suggesting that some females are programmed to produce thin-walled oocysts. The authors instead hypothesise that all oocysts are thick-walled and environmentally robust, but that a small number excyst in the gut before excretion; given the exponential asexual cycle, even rare reinfections can sustain heavy parasite burdens. Improved culture systems, including organoid co-culture, are now making post-fertilisation biology experimentally accessible for the first time. Because oocyst biogenesis is exclusive to females and conserved across coccidia, dissecting this female-driven process could expose factors essential for transmission and open new avenues for drugs or vaccines. As the authors argue, it is time to stop overlooking Cryptosporidium females, the true engines of the parasite&#8217;s success.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> The biology of female sexual stages and oocyst formation in Cryptosporidium parasites</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Mysterious girls: The biology of female Cryptosporidium parasites</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Stevens, S., Goddard, P., Walzer, K. A., &amp; Pawlowic, M. C. (2026). Mysterious girls: The biology of female Cryptosporidium parasites. <em>PLOS Pathogens, 22</em>(10), e1014678. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1014678" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1014678</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1014678" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1371/journal.ppat.1014678</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Cryptosporidium, parasitology, oocyst, sexual development, gametogenesis, apicomplexa, Cryptosporidium parvum, transmission, diarrhoeal disease, Wall Forming Bodies, meiosis, global health</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">266835</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Frankincense Meets Probiotics: A One-Two Punch Against Cryptosporidiosis</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/frankincense-meets-probiotics-a-one-two-punch-against-cryptosporidiosis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ophelia Keating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 18:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bacillus clausii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bacillus clausii probiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boswellia resin benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CD4/CD8 ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[combination therapy for cryptosporidiosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryptosporidiosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptosporidiosis treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptosporidium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frankincense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gut microbiome and parasitic disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbal and probiotic synergy in disease management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immunosuppressed mice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immunosuppressed patient treatment options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incensole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative approaches to cryptosporidiosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intestinal histopathology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural remedies for parasitic infections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olibanum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oocyst reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxidative stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probiotic therapy for intestinal infections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research on alternative therapies for protozoan infections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[use of frankincense in gut health]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=248773</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases reports that combining frankincense-derived olibanum extract with the probiotic Bacillus clausii reduced intestinal Cryptosporidium oocyst shedding by 98.4 percent in immunosuppressed mice while restoring gut architecture and immune balance.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cryptosporidiosis, the diarrheal disease caused by the protozoan parasite Cryptosporidium, remains one of the most underappreciated threats to vulnerable people worldwide. In healthy adults an infection is usually unpleasant but self-limiting; in young children, the elderly, and above all in patients whose immune systems have been deliberately or accidentally suppressed, the parasite can establish a chronic, wasting illness with no fully satisfactory drug available. Nitazoxanide, the only widely licensed therapy, performs poorly in the very patients who need it most, which is why researchers keep searching for alternatives that can both attack the parasite and repair the damaged gut. A new study published in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases now reports that a combination of an ancient resin extract and a modern probiotic bacterium may offer exactly that dual benefit, at least in a well-characterized mouse model of the disease.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Fadwa M. Arafa and colleagues, set out to test whether olibanum, the oleogum resin better known as frankincense, harvested from Boswellia trees, could work together with Bacillus clausii, a spore-forming bacterium long used in human medicine as a probiotic, to combat intestinal cryptosporidiosis in immunosuppressed mice. The logic of the pairing is appealing on several levels. Olibanum has a long ethnopharmacological history and contains a rich mixture of terpenoids and other bioactive molecules with documented anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties. Bacillus clausii, meanwhile, is remarkably resilient, surviving gastric acid as dormant spores and then germinating in the intestine, where it can modulate the local immune environment and compete with pathogens. Combining a directly acting phytochemical with an immune-modulating probiotic is a rational strategy for a disease in which both the parasite burden and the host&#8217;s inflammatory damage matter.</p>
<p>Before any efficacy testing, the investigators characterized the chemistry of their olibanum extract using liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry, a sensitive analytical technique that separates complex mixtures and identifies individual components by their mass and fragmentation behavior. The analysis revealed that the extract was dominated by isomers of incensole, a diterpenoid compound that has attracted growing scientific interest for its anti-inflammatory and even psychoactive properties. Knowing the dominant constituents matters for reproducibility and for future mechanistic work: if the extract proves effective, incensole isomers become the leading candidates for the active principle, and standardized preparations can be developed around them rather than relying on variable crude resin.</p>
<p>The efficacy experiments were structured around groups of mice rendered immunosuppressed, mimicking the clinical situation in patients with HIV/AIDS, transplant recipients on immunosuppressive drugs, or children with malnutrition-related immune impairment. After infection with Cryptosporidium, the animals received either olibanum extract alone, Bacillus clausii alone, the two together, or no specific therapy. The primary parasitological endpoint was the number of oocysts, the parasite&#8217;s environmentally resistant transmission stage, shed in the feces. Oocyst shedding is the standard measure of parasite burden in this model and also the direct source of environmental contamination, so reducing it has both therapeutic and epidemiological significance.</p>
<p>The results were striking. By the nineteenth day after infection, the combination therapy had reduced fecal oocyst counts by 98.4 percent, the highest reduction recorded in the study. Bacillus clausii alone achieved an 87.6 percent reduction, and olibanum alone came in close behind at 87 percent. Each treatment was therefore clearly active on its own, but the combination outperformed both, providing quantitative evidence of synergy between the resin extract and the probiotic. A reduction of this magnitude, if it translates to humans, would be clinically meaningful even by the standards of modern antiparasitic chemotherapy, and it was achieved without the toxicity concerns that limit some existing drugs.</p>
<p>To understand how the treatments were killing or disabling the parasite, the researchers turned to scanning electron microscopy, which allows visualization of the oocysts&#8217; surface architecture at extremely high magnification. Oocysts from mice treated with olibanum or Bacillus clausii individually showed a consistent pattern of ultrastructural damage: the normally smooth, ovoid structures became shrunken and deformed, with extensive pits and protrusions marring their surfaces. Such damage is more than cosmetic, because the oocyst wall is the parasite&#8217;s armor against the outside world and must remain intact for the organism to survive passage to a new host and to excyst successfully in the next intestine. The most dramatic finding, however, came from the combination group, where the oocysts were not merely deformed but completely distorted and ruptured, their walls destroyed outright. This graded progression of damage, from subtle surface changes with single agents to catastrophic wall failure with the combination, is a compelling visual signature of the synergistic mechanism at work.</p>
<p>The study went beyond parasite killing to examine the biochemical state of the infected animals. Cryptosporidium infection, like many intestinal infections, generates oxidative stress, a state in which reactive oxygen species damage cellular lipids, proteins, and DNA. One standard marker of this lipid damage is malondialdehyde, or MDA, whose serum levels rise as peroxidation proceeds. The antioxidant defense enzyme system, meanwhile, depends on molecules such as reduced glutathione, or GSH, which neutralize those reactive species. In the treated mice, both olibanum and Bacillus clausii, whether given alone or in combination, lowered serum MDA and raised mean GSH levels. In other words, the treatments did not just reduce the parasite load; they also shifted the host&#8217;s internal chemistry back toward a protected, antioxidant state, which likely contributes to the healing of the intestinal lining.</p>
<p>Histopathological examination of the intestine provided the structural counterpart to these biochemical findings. Cryptosporidium colonizes the surface of the small intestinal epithelium, where its presence blunts and distorts the villi, the finger-like projections that multiply the absorptive area of the gut, and disrupts the mucus-secreting goblet cells that form part of the mucosal barrier. The consequence is malabsorption, diarrhea, and weight loss, the clinical hallmarks of severe cryptosporidiosis. In the study, the best histological outcomes were observed after the combined olibanum and Bacillus clausii treatment, which restored the normal villus architecture, markedly ameliorated the detrimental intestinal inflammation, and improved goblet cell counts. The combination therefore did not merely suppress the parasite; it actively promoted the regeneration of the tissue that the parasite had damaged, a distinction that matters enormously for patients whose symptoms persist even when parasite counts fall.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most intriguing results came from immunohistochemical analysis of the lymphocyte populations within the intestinal villi. By staining tissue sections for CD4 and CD8 markers, the researchers could quantify the balance between helper T cells, which coordinate immune responses, and cytotoxic T cells, which kill infected cells. Treatment with olibanum, Bacillus clausii, or the combination produced a statistically significant rise in the CD4-positive to CD8-positive ratio compared with untreated infected animals. A higher CD4 to CD8 ratio signals a rebalancing of the mucosal immune response toward the helper-driven coordination that is essential for clearing protozoal infections, and it is particularly notable given that the animals were immunosuppressed. The probiotic component plausibly drives much of this immune modulation, since Bacillus species are known to interact with gut-associated lymphoid tissue, but the study&#8217;s design suggests that olibanum contributes as well, whether through its incensole-rich chemistry or through reducing the parasite-driven inflammatory burden.</p>
<p>Taken together, the parasitological, ultrastructural, biochemical, histopathological, and immunological data tell a coherent story. Olibanum extract and Bacillus clausii each impair Cryptosporidium oocysts and ease the oxidative and inflammatory damage of infection, but together they achieve near-total suppression of oocyst shedding, outright rupture of the parasite&#8217;s transmission stage, and the most complete restoration of gut structure and immune balance. The findings, published on 30 September 2026, position this resin-plus-probiotic pairing as a promising candidate for further development against a disease for which therapeutic options remain thin. Important caveats remain before any clinical translation: the work was performed in mice, doses and safety in immunosuppressed humans must be established, and the specific active molecules in olibanum need to be identified and standardized. Still, the study exemplifies a growing trend in antimicrobial research, the rational combination of plant-derived compounds with live biotherapeutics, and it offers a glimmer of hope for the immunocompromised patients who currently have the fewest options against this persistent intestinal parasite.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Combination therapy with olibanum extract and Bacillus clausii against intestinal cryptosporidiosis in immunosuppressed mice</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Unravelling the synergistic potential of Olibanum extract and Bacillus clausii in combating intestinal cryptosporidiosis in immunosuppressed mice</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Arafa, F. M., Hagar, M., Zakaria, A., Sheta, E., &amp; Hezema, N. N. (2026). Unravelling the synergistic potential of Olibanum extract and Bacillus clausii in combating intestinal cryptosporidiosis in immunosuppressed mice. <em>PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 20</em>(9), e0014734. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014734" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014734</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014734" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1371/journal.pntd.0014734</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> cryptosporidiosis, Cryptosporidium, olibanum, frankincense, Bacillus clausii, probiotics, immunosuppressed mice, oocyst reduction, incensole, oxidative stress, intestinal histopathology, CD4/CD8 ratio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">248773</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Massive single-cell atlas reveals how diverse gut infections reprogram the intestinal lining</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/massive-single-cell-atlas-reveals-how-diverse-gut-infections-reprogram-the-intestinal-lining/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristina Jarvis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell-cell communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CITE-seq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CITE-seq in gut research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptosporidium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterocytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gut infection response mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gut microbiome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gut pathogen-host interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GutPath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ileum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ileum immune cell profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intestinal epithelial cell diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intestinal epithelium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesenteric lymph node immune profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbiota-driven gut immune responses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mucosal immunology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nippostrongylus brasiliensis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathogen reprogramming of intestinal lining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single-cell atlas of intestinal infections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single-cell genomics in gastrointestinal health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single-Cell RNA Sequencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spatial transcriptomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yersinia pseudotuberculosis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=247778</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new single-cell atlas of more than 500,000 cells shows that viral, bacterial, fungal and parasitic infections each leave distinct transcriptional fingerprints on the intestinal epithelium, including a STAT3-driven enterocyte state spatially linked to Yersinia-induced inflammatory lesions.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The distal small intestine, or ileum, is one of the busiest crossroads in mammalian biology. It absorbs vitamin B12, bile acids, fat-soluble vitamins, water and electrolytes, all while acting as a physical and immunological barrier against a constant stream of microbes. Yet despite its central role in nutrition and host defense, and its prominence in Crohn&#8217;s disease, the ileum has been surprisingly neglected by single-cell genomics compared with the colon. A new Resource published in Nature Immunology by Daniel Beiting of the University of Pennsylvania and colleagues, working as part of the Mucosal Immunology Studies Team consortium, aims to close that gap. The team has built GutPath, a publicly accessible atlas of more than 500,000 individual cells from the mouse ileum and the ileal-draining mesenteric lymph node, profiled both at steady state and during six phylogenetically distinct infections or colonizations.</p>
<p>The technical foundation of GutPath is CITE-seq, a method that simultaneously captures transcriptomes and roughly 100 surface proteins from the same single cells. The researchers profiled the intestinal epithelium, the underlying lamina propria and the mesenteric lymph node in mice infected with segmented filamentous bacteria, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, the helminth Nippostrongylus brasiliensis, the fungus Candida albicans, the apicomplexan parasite Cryptosporidium parvum and murine norovirus strain CR6. After rigorous quality control, the atlas retained 505,956 high-quality cells, split between roughly 321,000 ileal cells and 185,000 lymph node cells, with individual cells averaging more than 6,000 transcripts. Annotation combined automated reference-based methods with extensive manual curation, resolving 91 distinct transcriptional cell states in the ileum and 49 in the lymph node, organized in multiple layers from broad lineages down to highly specific phenotypes.</p>
<p>A crucial validation step was to confirm that the atlas faithfully reproduces established immunological archetypes. Differential abundance analysis of cell neighborhoods showed that Nippostrongylus infection expanded tuft and goblet cell populations, the classic hyperplasia seen in helminth-driven type 2 immunity, while Yersinia drove a marked recruitment of neutrophils and monocytes, hallmarks of acute bacterial infection. Cryptosporidium and Yersinia both increased Ifng expression in natural killer and natural killer T cells and enriched the interferon-gamma signaling program, consistent with known interferon-dependent control of the parasite. Murine norovirus produced a more modest type I interferon signature, and both Candida colonization and segmented filamentous bacteria enriched T helper 17 differentiation programs in lymph node T cells, with Candida also elevating transforming growth factor-beta signaling and hypoxia-related gene sets. In other words, the atlas captures the canonical immunology of each model, giving researchers confidence in what it reports about the unexpected.</p>
<p>That confidence matters because the most striking findings emerged from the epithelial compartment rather than the immune one. When the team performed unbiased differential expression analysis, the magnitude of transcriptional change varied enormously across infections, with Nippostrongylus and Yersinia producing the most robust responses and murine norovirus and Candida the weakest. At stringent fold-change thresholds, intestinal epithelial cells, including enterocytes, stem cells, transit-amplifying cells and goblet cells, together with fibroblasts, emerged as major drivers of the innate response across all infections. Strikingly, the genes induced in stem cells, transit-amplifying cells and enterocytes showed remarkably little overlap between infections, indicating that the epithelium mounts largely pathogen-specific transcriptional programs rather than a generic alarm response.</p>
<p>To understand these programs, the researchers exploited the fact that their sample preparation captured the full developmental lifespan of the enterocyte, from Lgr5-positive stem cells in the crypts through transit-amplifying cells to mature absorptive cells at the villus tip. Pseudotime trajectory inference, validated against well-established marker genes, allowed them to map gene expression along this differentiation axis. Among 4,278 genes whose expression changes along the trajectory in naive mice, 82 encode solute carrier transporters, the transmembrane proteins on apical and basal enterocyte surfaces that move nutrients and ions. Twenty-nine of these transporters, 35 percent, were dysregulated in at least one infection. Some, such as the nucleoside transporter Slc28a2 and the taurine transporter Slc6a6, retained their developmental timing but were downregulated by Yersinia and Nippostrongylus, while others, including the phosphate symporter Slc20a1 and the mitochondrial glutathione transporter Slc25a39, showed infection-altered timing of expression, suggesting either spatially distinct niches along the villus or a broader shift in enterocyte state.</p>
<p>The helminth model revealed how deeply infection can reach into epithelial metabolism. Scoring metabolic tasks with the scCellfie framework showed that enterocytes from Nippostrongylus-infected mice had the most pronounced alterations of any condition, concentrated in lipid metabolism, with reduced synthesis of secondary bile acids and altered handling of fatty acids such as palmitate, linoleate and arachidonate. Cell-cell communication analysis predicted that these enterocytes were receiving interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 signals, the canonical type 2 cytokines, and were producing fibroblast growth factor family ligands, including Fgf15, a key regulator of bile acid and cholesterol metabolism. Mass spectrometry confirmed the biology: epithelial scrapings, but not luminal contents, showed elevated fatty acids in infected mice, and the accumulation correlated with worm burden, linking pathogen load directly to metabolic disruption of the tissue.</p>
<p>Yersinia pseudotuberculosis produced an even more distinctive epithelial phenotype. Clustering imbalance analysis showed that only Yersinia, among all six models, generated a unique enterocyte transcriptional state, which the authors named Yps enterocytes. Pseudotime modeling revealed that Yersinia elicited more temporally regulated differentially expressed genes than all other infections combined, and the 132 genes defining Yps enterocytes included acute-phase proteins such as Saa1 and Saa2, the antimicrobial effectors Nos2 and Reg3a, and a strong enrichment of immune defense ontology terms. Transcription factor motif analysis pointed to STAT3, a downstream effector of many cytokine cascades, and to SREBF1, a regulator of fatty acid synthesis, with the STAT3 signature being specific to the Yps population.</p>
<p>Spatial transcriptomics then connected this state to tissue pathology. Yersinia infection produces dense inflammatory foci called pyogranulomas, rich in bacteria, neutrophils and monocytes. Using the 10x Genomics Xenium platform with a 5,000-gene panel, the team profiled more than 680,000 spatially resolved cells and computationally unrolled intestinal Swiss rolls into a linear proximal-to-distal axis. Yps enterocyte gene expression peaked precisely at pyogranuloma locations, and cell-cell communication predictions identified an IL-22/STAT3/IL-18 signaling axis: IL-22 expression peaked at the pyogranuloma, STAT3-activated enterocytes produced IL-18, and IL-18 receptor signaling was predicted to reach innate lymphoid cells, natural killer cells and natural killer T cells within the inflammatory focus. Stereo-seq analysis showed that Yersinia transcripts remained confined to the base of the pyogranuloma and did not extend into the overlying enterocytes, and immunohistochemistry confirmed phospho-STAT1 activation at pyogranulomas and broader phospho-STAT3 activation across the tissue, supporting a model in which immune-derived cytokines, rather than direct bacterial contact, drive the epithelial phenotype.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most conceptually important observation is that some infection-induced programs ripple far beyond the sites of heaviest pathogen burden. Genes such as Nos2 and Hif1a were restricted to enterocytes immediately above pyogranulomas, but Saa1, Stat3 and the iron exporter Slc40a1 were elevated across the entire ileum. A parallel ripple appeared in the helminth model, where a proximal intestinal infection remodeled the distal ileum. The authors caution that their atlas captures a single early time point per infection and that fragile granulocytes may be underrepresented, but the resource itself, freely queryable through CELLxGENE at gutpath.org with all raw data and code available, offers the immunology community a reference for label transfer, hypothesis generation and the study of how focal infections and inflammatory lesions, including those of Crohn&#8217;s disease, broadcast their effects across the intestinal landscape.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Single-cell transcriptomic profiling of intestinal epithelial and immune cell responses to diverse enteric infections in mice</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Diverse infections transcriptionally reprogram the intestinal epithelium and epithelial–immune cell interactions</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Hart, A., Merolle, M., Howard, C., Haskins, B. E., Cohn, I. S., Bobba, S., Xiao, R., Yang, Y., Cadwell, K., Ma, J., Yano, H., Hou, X., Wallbank, B. A., Cutillo, D., Ivanov, I. I., Striepen, B., Shin, S., Brodsky, I. E., Artis, D., &#8230; Artis, D. (2026). Diverse infections transcriptionally reprogram the intestinal epithelium and epithelial–immune cell interactions. <em>Nature Immunology</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-026-02665-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-026-02665-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-026-02665-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41590-026-02665-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> GutPath, single-cell RNA sequencing, CITE-seq, intestinal epithelium, ileum, enterocytes, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, Nippostrongylus brasiliensis, Cryptosporidium, mucosal immunology, spatial transcriptomics, cell-cell communication</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">247778</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sheep in Central Anatolia Carry a Cattle Parasite for the First Time in Türkiye</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/sheep-in-central-anatolia-carry-a-cattle-parasite-for-the-first-time-in-turkiye/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William Thompson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 09:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18S rRNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Akkaraman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cattle parasite cross-species infection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Anatolia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Anatolia parasite transmission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptosporidium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptosporidium bovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptosporidium bovis in sheep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptosporidium parvum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptosporidium xiaoi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disease risk in small ruminants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA sequencing of parasite species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emerging host range of Cryptos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental resistance of Cryptosporidium oocysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fecal screening for zoonotic parasites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular detection of Cryptosporidium in sheep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular epidemiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ovine cryptosporidiosis in Türkiye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitic infections in Turkish sheep farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prevalence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health implications of Cryptosporidium in livestock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sheep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Türkiye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoonosis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=240914</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A molecular survey of 300 healthy Akkaraman sheep in Central Anatolia has revealed three Cryptosporidium species, including the first detection of the cattle parasite Cryptosporidium bovis in sheep in Türkiye.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A microscopic parasite best known for sickening calves has turned up in an unexpected host. Researchers surveying apparently healthy sheep across Central Anatolia have reported the first detection of Cryptosporidium bovis in sheep in Türkiye, a finding that reshapes assumptions about which Cryptosporidium species circulate among the country&#8217;s small ruminants. The study, published in Acta Parasitologica, combined large-scale fecal screening with DNA sequencing of the parasite&#8217;s 18S ribosomal RNA gene, offering one of the most detailed molecular snapshots to date of ovine cryptosporidiosis in the region.</p>
<p>Cryptosporidium species are obligate intracellular apicomplexan parasites that infect the intestinal epithelium of a wide range of vertebrates, causing gastroenteritis and diarrhea that can be severe in young animals and dangerous, sometimes life-threatening, in immunocompromised people. Unlike many enteric pathogens, Cryptosporidium oocysts are remarkably resistant to environmental stress and to standard water-treatment disinfection, which makes even asymptomatic carriers relevant to public health. Because infected animals shed infectious oocysts in their feces without necessarily showing signs of disease, understanding which species inhabit which hosts is central to assessing transmission risk on farms and in watersheds.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Sümmani Çifci of Aksaray University together with colleagues at Erciyes University, focused on the Akkaraman breed, a hardy indigenous sheep breed that dominates the flocks of Central Anatolia. Between the provinces of Nevşehir, Sivas, and Kayseri, the investigators collected fresh fecal samples from 300 healthy Akkaraman sheep, one hundred animals per province, drawn randomly from a variety of small-scale farms. Restricting the survey to clinically healthy animals was a deliberate choice: it allowed the team to measure the burden of subclinical infections, the silent reservoir that conventional disease surveillance tends to miss.</p>
<p>In the laboratory, genomic DNA was extracted from each sample and screened for Cryptosporidium using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), a technique that amplifies parasite-specific DNA sequences to levels that can be detected even when oocyst numbers are low. Positive samples then underwent sequence analysis of the 18S ribosomal RNA gene, the standard genetic barcode for distinguishing Cryptosporidium species, whose oocysts are morphologically nearly identical under the microscope. The resulting sequences were compared against reference databases and used to build phylogenetic trees, placing each isolate within the parasite&#8217;s evolutionary framework.</p>
<p>The headline result was an overall prevalence of 6.0 percent, with 18 of the 300 sheep testing positive for Cryptosporidium. Sequence analysis resolved these infections into three species: Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium bovis each accounted for seven animals, corresponding to 2.3 percent of the flock sample, while Cryptosporidium xiaoi was found in four animals, or 1.3 percent. The team deposited the sequences in the GenBank database under accession numbers MZ027074 through MZ027078, making them available for future comparative studies worldwide.</p>
<p>The detection of C. bovis in sheep is the study&#8217;s most striking claim. As its name suggests, C. bovis is primarily a cattle parasite, typically associated with subclinical infections in post-weaned calves and adult bovines. Finding it in ovine hosts in Türkiye is, according to the authors, a first for the country and adds to a growing international literature showing that host boundaries among Cryptosporidium species are more permeable than once assumed. Such cross-species spillover matters because it hints at possible transmission between cattle and sheep sharing pasture, water sources, or farm infrastructure, and because it complicates the simple assumption that each livestock species carries its own characteristic parasite fauna.</p>
<p>The other two species found carry their own significance. C. parvum is the most clinically important Cryptosporidium in mammals and a major zoonotic agent, responsible for a large share of human cryptosporidiosis cases worldwide, including outbreaks linked to contaminated drinking water. Its presence in apparently healthy ewes and rams underscores that even symptom-free sheep can contribute oocysts to the environment. C. xiaoi, by contrast, is considered largely host-adapted to sheep and goats and is generally of lower zoonotic concern, though it has been documented in periparturient transmission from ewes to lambs. The mixture of zoonotic and host-adapted species within a single flock profile illustrates the epidemiological complexity of ovine cryptosporidiosis.</p>
<p>Statistical analysis of the survey data added an age dimension to the picture. Positivity rates differed significantly across age groups, with a p-value below 0.0001, indicating that the probability of detecting Cryptosporidium DNA was far from uniform among young and older animals. This pattern is consistent with the biology of the parasite: young lambs are typically more susceptible to active infection and higher oocyst shedding, while adults more often harbor transient or low-level infections. Notably, no significant difference emerged between male and female sheep, with a p-value of 0.548, suggesting that sex does not meaningfully shape infection risk in this population.</p>
<p>Phylogenetic analysis reinforced the coherence of the species identifications. The Anatolian isolates clustered within the same clades as reference sequences reported from different hosts and geographic regions, meaning that the Turkish parasites are genetically consistent with their counterparts elsewhere rather than representing divergent local lineages. This kind of global genetic continuity is exactly what allows molecular epidemiologists to trace potential transmission routes across farms, regions, and even countries, and it strengthens confidence that the species assignments were not artifacts of sequencing noise.</p>
<p>For the authors, the findings carry a clear practical message: Cryptosporidium infections in sheep deserve active control attention, not only because of their potential impact on lamb health and productivity but because of their public health relevance. Healthy sheep on small-scale farms, the study shows, can silently host both zoonotic C. parvum and the previously unrecorded bovine species C. bovis, contributing to environmental contamination that may reach humans through water, food, or direct contact. As molecular surveillance expands, the team suggests that the true diversity of Cryptosporidium circulating among Türkiye&#8217;s small ruminants is likely greater than microscopy-based surveys have revealed, and that continued genotyping will be essential for mapping and ultimately interrupting transmission at the human-animal interface.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Molecular prevalence and species characterization of Cryptosporidium parasites in sheep in Central Anatolia, Türkiye</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Molecular Characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in Sheep from Central Anatolia: First Report of Cryptosporidium bovis in Ovine Hosts in Türkiye</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Çifci, S., Arslanhan, B. A., Önder, Z., &amp; Düzlü, Ö. (2026). Molecular Characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in Sheep from Central Anatolia: First Report of Cryptosporidium bovis in Ovine Hosts in Türkiye. <em>Acta Parasitologica, 71</em>(5), Article 231. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-026-01418-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-026-01418-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-026-01418-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11686-026-01418-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Cryptosporidium, sheep, Akkaraman, Central Anatolia, Türkiye, Cryptosporidium bovis, Cryptosporidium parvum, Cryptosporidium xiaoi, 18S rRNA, molecular epidemiology, zoonosis, prevalence</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">240914</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
