<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>cryptomare &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/cryptomare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 14:50:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Chang&#8217;e-6 Moon Soil Reveals 500-Million-Year Cosmic-Ray Exposure History</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/change-6-moon-soil-reveals-500-million-year-cosmic-ray-exposure-history/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 14:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chang'e-6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chang'e-6 lunar soil cosmic-ray exposure history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cosmic-ray exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cosmogenic isotope analysis in lunar rocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cosmogenic isotopes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryptomare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ejecta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extraterrestrial cosmic-ray exposure dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact excavation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KREEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KREEP-bearing lunar rock provenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lunar basaltic clast excavation timeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lunar far side]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lunar impact event chronology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lunar regolith formation and evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lunar sample return mission insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lunar surface material redistribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lunar surface stratigraphy and material mixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature Communications.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote sensing of lunar surface composition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Pole-Aitken basin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Pole-Aitken basin impact processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space weathering]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=334895</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Cosmogenic isotope measurements in Chang'e-6 samples show the returned soil was exposed to cosmic rays for roughly 500 million years and reveal multiple excavation histories, including KREEP-bearing clasts that suggest this material is more widespread on the lunar far side than previously recognized.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fragments of rock carried back from the Moon&#x27;s far side by China&#x27;s Chang&#x27;e-6 mission have yielded new clues about how the giant South Pole-Aitken basin shuffled material across the lunar surface. By measuring cosmogenic isotopes of samarium, hafnium, and chromium in the returned soil and individual rock clasts, researchers determined that the Chang&#x27;e-6 soil has an average cosmic-ray exposure age of roughly 500 million years, indicating when its constituent material was excavated at the sampling site. Most of the low-titanium basaltic clasts in the sample set showed prolonged exposure histories similar to the host soil, suggesting they were dug up in the same excavation event.</p>
<p>However, two basaltic clasts stood out: they were excavated more recently, meaning their material traveled to the sampling site through a different or later impact process. The team then turned to the KREEP-bearing clasts. These clasts fell into two distinct compositional groups, and their cosmic-ray exposure ages did not overlap, pointing to separate excavation histories rather than a single provenance event.</p>
<p>In other words, the KREEP materials at the Chang&#x27;e-6 site arrived through more than one route. By comparing the clast compositions with remote-sensing observations of the lunar surface, the researchers identified candidate source regions: the magnesium-rich pyroxene annulus surrounding the basin for one compositional group, and buried basalt plains known as cryptomare for the other. Ejecta transport within and beyond the South Pole-Aitken basin therefore appears to have delivered geochemically distinct material to the far-side sampling location from multiple destinations.</p>
<p>The broader significance lies in the distribution of KREEP material. The study, published in Nature Communications as an open-access article, is based on Chang&#x27;e-6 samples from the South Pole-Aitken basin, though the authors note that effects of impact and space weathering on the lunar farside remain only partially constrained.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Cosmic-ray exposure ages and ejecta provenance of Chang&#x27;e-6 samples from the South Pole-Aitken basin</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Cosmogenic isotopic evidence from Chang’e-6 clasts for excavation history and ejecta provenance in the South Pole-Aitken basin</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Zhou, M., Zhang, Y., Chen, J., Luo, R., Wang, Z., Zuo, Z., Chen, D., Chen, K., Liu, K., Shen, J., Liu, B., &amp; Qin, L. (2026). Cosmogenic isotopic evidence from Chang’e-6 clasts for excavation history and ejecta provenance in the South Pole-Aitken basin. <em>Nature Communications</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-78270-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-78270-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-78270-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41467-026-78270-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Chang&#x27;e-6, Moon, South Pole-Aitken basin, cosmic-ray exposure, cosmogenic isotopes, KREEP, lunar far side, ejecta, cryptomare, impact excavation, space weathering, Nature Communications</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">334895</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
