<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CRBN &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/crbn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 23:41:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>New High-Throughput Screening Platform Accelerates the Hunt for Molecular Glue Degraders</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/new-high-throughput-screening-platform-accelerates-the-hunt-for-molecular-glue-degraders/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis Brooks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 23:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CK1α]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRBN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRISPR knockout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug discovery platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRUG-seq2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E3 ubiquitin ligase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E3 ubiquitin ligase modulators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event-driven pharmacology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gene set enrichment analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glue Perturbation Screen (GPS)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSPT1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-throughput screening for protein degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immunomodulatory drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular glue degraders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein-protein interaction modulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proteomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small molecule degraders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systematic screening for molecular glues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[targeted protein degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transcriptomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transcriptomics-driven drug discovery]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=213447</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have built a scalable transcriptomic screening platform that uses gene expression signatures and CRBN knockout cell models to systematically identify and prioritize molecular glue degraders from large compound libraries.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For decades, one of the most powerful ideas in modern pharmacology has been remarkably difficult to pursue systematically: the molecular glue. These small compounds do not block a protein&#8217;s active site the way conventional drugs do. Instead, they stick to an E3 ubiquitin ligase and remodel its surface, creating a brand-new docking interface that drags an otherwise unwanted protein into the cell&#8217;s waste-disposal machinery. The result is event-driven pharmacology—rather than merely occupying a target, the drug eliminates it entirely. The clinical triumphs of immunomodulatory drugs such as lenalidomide and of the sulfonamide indisulam proved the concept, but both were recognized as molecular glues only years after their phenotypic effects were first observed. Discovery, in other words, has been largely an accident of history. A new study published in iScience by Diyun Huang, Zeyu Shuang, Lu Chen, and colleagues now describes a scalable, transcriptomics-driven platform—dubbed the Glue Perturbation Screen, or GPS—that aims to replace serendipity with a systematic, high-throughput pipeline for finding these elusive degraders.</p>
<p>The core problem the researchers set out to solve is a bottleneck familiar to anyone working in targeted protein degradation. Proteomics-based approaches can, in principle, reveal every protein whose abundance changes when a compound is applied, but they are expensive and slow, making them impractical as a first-pass screen for large chemical libraries. Target-based biochemical assays such as AlphaLISA or TR-FRET require purified proteins and, crucially, prior knowledge of which target-E3 pair to test—an assumption that defeats the purpose of hunting for glues against unknown or classically undruggable substrates like transcription factors and scaffold proteins. Phenotypic screens, meanwhile, are biologically rich but cannot easily distinguish a true degrader from an ordinary inhibitor, forcing laborious downstream mechanistic deconvolution. What the field needed was a cheap, fast, and mechanistically informative primary readout.</p>
<p>The team&#8217;s answer was to make the transcriptome itself the universal readout. Gene expression signatures are high-dimensional proxies for cellular state, a principle demonstrated at scale by the L1000 platform and made affordable by DRUG-seq, which skips RNA purification and uses direct cell lysis with multiplexed library preparation. The researchers employed an optimized version, DRUG-seq2, which they report offers superior sensitivity for low-abundance regulatory transcripts—a critical feature when the signals of interest come from immature, weak molecular glues. In their workflow, Hep3B liver cancer cells were seeded in 96-well plates, treated with compounds at a uniform concentration of 1 micromolar for 24 hours, and processed through the miniaturized sequencing protocol. The library comprised 117 compounds: 11 commercial molecular glues serving as validated benchmarks and 106 in-house candidates synthesized by two collaborative research groups, all rationally designed to modulate the cereblon (CRBN) E3 ligase.</p>
<p>A deceptively simple but essential innovation lies in how the baseline is defined. Because DRUG-seq2 relies on direct lysis, technical noise can swamp the subtle transcriptional ripples produced by nascent glues. Before any analysis, the team performed systematic pairwise Pearson correlation analysis across all DMSO vehicle wells on each plate, excluding any replicate with a correlation coefficient below 0.95. By constructing the reference transcriptome solely from high-consensus control wells, they established a robust, self-consistent zero-point that maximizes statistical power to resolve low-magnitude perturbations. Downstream, differential expression analysis with DESeq2—flagging genes with absolute log2 fold change greater than 1 and adjusted p-value below 0.05—was paired with gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) built from six curated collections, including Hallmark, Reactome, KEGG, Gene Ontology Biological Process, C6, and the C3 transcription factor target set. This two-layer design means even compounds with few or zero individual differentially expressed genes can still betray coordinated pathway-level activity.</p>
<p>The mechanistic heart of the platform is a genetic benchmark: an isogenic pair of Hep3B cell lines, one wild-type and one in which CRBN has been knocked out via CRISPR-Cas9. The researchers established a stable Cas9-expressing parent line, introduced single-guide RNAs targeting CRBN, and isolated single-cell clones. Clone 3 emerged as the definitive knockout after rigorous validation. Treatment with CC-90009, a clinical molecular glue that degrades the translation termination factor GSPT1, provided the proof: in wild-type cells the drug rapidly and almost completely eliminated GSPT1 protein, while in the knockout the effect vanished entirely, along with the drug&#8217;s cytotoxic potency, which showed a pronounced right-shift in the IC50 curve. Any compound whose transcriptional signature collapses in the knockout is therefore flagged as CRBN-dependent—a hallmark of a genuine glue—whereas signals that persist likely reflect off-target toxicity, conventional inhibition, or hijacking of a different E3 ligase such as VHL or DCAF16.</p>
<p>Screening the full library revealed a strikingly polarized activity spectrum. Roughly 20 percent of the compounds were transcriptionally inert, producing zero differentially expressed genes under the test conditions. At the other extreme, the high-activity cluster was dominated by known glues: SJ3149, which targets CK1α, elicited the most profound response, followed by lenalidomide, BMS-986397, and a MYC degrader. For most of these, transcriptional activity was almost completely abolished in the CRBN knockout, exactly as expected for classic glues. Encouragingly, one in-house compound, LC-02-047-P1, landed among the potent performers, marking it as a promising novel candidate. Conversely, compounds such as LC-02-105 and LC-02-033 displayed a paradoxical knockout-amplified phenotype, indicating CRBN-independent mechanisms and allowing the team to filter out molecules whose intrinsic scaffold toxicity overwhelmed any degradation function.</p>
<p>The pathway-level analysis added mechanistic texture that raw gene counts alone could not provide. Potent GSPT1 degraders such as CC-90009 upregulated regulators of the integrated stress response—DDIT3 (CHOP), GDF15, TRIB3, DDIT4, and PPP1R15A—consistent with the biology of translation termination failure: ribosomes stall at stop codons, collide, and trigger the ZAKα-mediated ribotoxic stress response, which in turn activates ATF4 and suppresses the translational apparatus to mitigate proteotoxic stress. GSEA of CC-90009 confirmed enrichment of integrated stress response, proteasome, and apoptosis pathways alongside downregulation of translation machinery. LC-02-047-P1, by contrast, showed metabolic rather than stress-related regulatory characteristics, hinting that its degraded target might be an upstream switch governing multiple metabolic pathways. The enrichment layer also rescued latent hits: LC-02-051 performed modestly in the differential expression analysis but ranked near the top in pathway enrichment, and its signal was completely blocked by CRBN knockout—suggesting a genuine but weak glue worth optimizing. Even CC-92480 yielded an instructive anomaly, showing slightly expanded enrichment in knockout cells, which the authors attribute to the absence of its high-affinity target IKZF1 in Hep3B, pushing the compound toward non-canonical substrates or generic xenobiotic stress.</p>
<p>To translate these multidimensional data into decisions, the researchers built a scatterplot integrating transcriptional potency (differential gene counts) with functional breadth (enriched pathway counts) across both wild-type and knockout conditions, then stratified the library into four tiers. Tier one comprises potent glues with high wild-type activity that nearly vanishes upon CRBN loss—the highest priorities for optimization. Tier two captures intermediate and latent leads whose coordinated functional signals suggest seed scaffolds needing structural refinement. Tier three contains active but E3-independent perturbators, likely conventional inhibitors, and tier four collects inert compounds. The spatial logic is intuitive: strong glues such as SJ3149, lenalidomide, CC-90009, and LC-02-047-P1 occupy the upper-right quadrant and collapse toward the origin in the knockout, while pharmacologically inert molecules cluster near the origin in both conditions and target-independent agents stubbornly refuse to move. The thresholds, the authors note, can be customized for different libraries.</p>
<p>Proteomic cross-validation demonstrated that the transcriptomic tiers predict real degradation events. Tandem mass tag quantitative proteomics of LC-02-047-P1-treated Hep3B cells revealed marked downregulation of CSNK1A1 (CK1α), and western blotting across Hep3B, Huh7, and HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma lines confirmed near-complete, selective CK1α degradation with no effect on GSPT1. A decisive control sealed the case: cells engineered to express a non-degradable GSPT1 mutant abolished CC-90009&#8217;s activity but left LC-02-047-P1&#8217;s CK1α degradation untouched, proving the candidate acts entirely independently of GSPT1. The weaker tier-two compound LC-02-051 produced only minor proteomic perturbation, with TPM3 changes failing statistical validation—consistent with its latent classification. On scalability, the economics are compelling: the platform costs less than 100 RMB (roughly 14 US dollars) per sample, about 2 percent of standard TMT proteomics, with an end-to-end turnaround of three to four weeks even beyond 1,000 compounds.</p>
<p>The authors are candid about limitations. The single 24-hour window captures an integrated cellular state—primary degradation consequences blended with secondary cascades and stress responses—rather than the immediate transcriptional footprints of neosubstrate depletion, and future iterations will incorporate time-resolved profiling. Transcriptomic signatures also remain an indirect proxy for protein-level events, so candidate leads must ultimately be confirmed by quantitative proteomics and structural biology demonstrating direct ternary complex formation. The choice of screening cell line matters too, since E3 and substrate abundance dictate sensitivity; the authors suggest abundance-matched models, such as VHL-high or DCAF15-high backgrounds, for targeted campaigns. Even so, the GPS platform fills a genuine gap, bridging high-volume chemical screening and low-throughput mechanistic validation, and offering the field a practical roadmap for converting molecular glue discovery from a lucky accident into an engineering discipline.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> High-throughput transcriptomic screening for the discovery of CRBN-dependent molecular glue degraders</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> A scalable, high-throughput glue perturbation screening platform for molecular glue discovery</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Huang, D., Shuang, Z., Chen, L., Ouyang, H., Yang, P., Huang, L., Lu, W., Shi, M., Ding, X., Jiang, B., &amp; Wu, W. (2026). A scalable, high-throughput glue perturbation screening platform for molecular glue discovery. <em>iScience, 29</em>(10), Article 117600. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.117600" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.117600</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.117600" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.isci.2026.117600</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> molecular glue degraders, targeted protein degradation, CRBN, DRUG-seq2, transcriptomics, gene set enrichment analysis, CRISPR knockout, E3 ubiquitin ligase, proteomics, drug discovery, GSPT1, CK1α</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">213447</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dogs May Not Respond to Thalidomide, Genetic Study Warns</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/dogs-may-not-respond-to-thalidomide-genetic-study-warns/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathaniel Bowman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 18:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canine cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canine cancer treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cereblon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cereblon protein and drug response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparative genomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparative genomics of dogs and mice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRBN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dog10K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug repurposing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic analysis of dogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of thalidomide on animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implications for human and veterinary drug use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limitations of drug repurposing in veterinary medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular signature in dogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neo-substrates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teratogenicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thalidomide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thalidomide resistance in canines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tumor sequencing in canine cancers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubiquitin ligase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veterinary oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veterinary oncology and drug efficacy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=197456</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Genomic analysis of nearly 2,000 dogs reveals that they carry the same cereblon variation that makes mice insensitive to thalidomide, casting doubt on the drug's therapeutic use in canine cancer.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thalidomide is one of the most infamous drugs in modern medicine, a sedative withdrawn from the market in 1961 after causing severe birth defects in thousands of children. Yet in the decades since, the drug has been carefully repurposed for human cancers such as multiple myeloma and for inflammatory skin conditions, and veterinary oncologists have increasingly explored its use in dogs with cancer. A new genetic analysis now throws that practice into serious doubt. By examining the genomes of nearly 2,000 canids together with tumor sequencing data from multiple canine cancers, researchers found that dogs carry the same molecular signature that renders mice largely insensitive to thalidomide, raising the possibility that the drug may be ineffective, or at least behave very differently, in canine patients.</p>
<p>The study, led by Maja Louise Arendt of the University of Copenhagen and Jennifer R. S. Meadows of Uppsala University and SciLifeLab, focused on cereblon, the protein that thalidomide binds. Cereblon was only identified as the drug&#8217;s primary target in 2010, when researchers showed that thalidomide attaches to this substrate receptor of the cullin-4 E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, known as CUL4-RBX1-DDB1. When thalidomide occupies cereblon, the degradation machinery&#8217;s specificity changes: it begins recruiting, ubiquitinating and destroying an unnatural set of proteins called neo-substrates, including transcription factors such as SALL4, p63, Ikaros and Aiolos. These proteins govern critical developmental and immunological processes, which helps explain both the drug&#8217;s teratogenic tragedy and its therapeutic benefits. At the same time, native substrates such as MEIS2 are no longer degraded, adding further biological consequences. To date, cereblon remains the only described mammalian target of thalidomide.</p>
<p>The crux of the new findings lies in a single amino acid position within the cereblon protein. The C-terminal region of human cereblon, spanning roughly amino acids 318 to 426, forms the thalidomide-binding CULT domain, and variation within this 109-amino-acid stretch is known to determine how different species respond to the drug. In humans, the amino acid at position 388 is a valine, abbreviated V388. In mice, the equivalent position holds an isoleucine instead. This seemingly minor substitution does not prevent thalidomide from binding to cereblon, but it creates steric hindrance that blocks neo-substrates from entering the binding pocket, preventing their ubiquitination and degradation. The result is that thalidomide and its derivatives are pharmacologically ineffective in mice, a fact that contributed to the drug&#8217;s original licensing as a supposedly safe sedative, since rodent tests failed to predict its devastating effects in humans.</p>
<p>When the researchers mined the Dog10K consortium datasets, which include single nucleotide and structural variant calls from 1,929 and 1,879 canids respectively, they found that every single dog examined encodes an isoleucine at the position equivalent to human V388. Across the roughly 30-kilobase CRBN gene region, 384 variable sites were detected, but only three had any potential to alter the protein&#8217;s coding sequence, and each of these was extraordinarily rare, with allele frequencies below 0.2 percent. Two structural deletions overlapping the gene were also identified, both at frequencies below 0.5 percent. In other words, the canine cereblon protein is essentially uniform across the species, and it uniformly carries the mouse-like isoleucine that has been shown to abolish thalidomide&#8217;s neo-substrate degradation activity.</p>
<p>To place this finding in evolutionary context, the team turned to two massive comparative genomics resources: the Zoonomia alignment of 240 mammalian species and the TOGA alignment covering 344 eutherian mammals. At the nucleotide level, the codon encoding position 388 showed little evolutionary constraint, with phyloP conservation scores of 0.40, 4.66 and -1.74 across its three bases; only the second position showed purifying selection. This wobbling tolerance is mirrored by amino acid variability across the mammalian tree. Among 344 species, 72 percent encode an isoleucine at the equivalent position, including all 55 available species of the order Carnivora, to which dogs belong. Only bats, rodents and rabbits, and the order Primates, which includes humans, were found to encode both valine and isoleucine at this site. Notably, rabbits and guinea pigs carry a valine, consistent with decades of toxicology data showing that rabbits, unlike mice, do develop thalidomide-induced birth defects similar to those seen in humans.</p>
<p>The researchers also considered whether cancer itself might change the equation. Tumors accumulate mutations that can alter drug sensitivity, so the team searched for non-silent, protein-altering mutations in the CRBN gene within two published canine tumor-normal sequencing datasets, comprising 55 mammary tumors and 43 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cases, as well as 723 samples from the cBioportal Canine Cancer Genome Atlas. The search yielded almost nothing: a single non-synonymous mutation, p.CRBN A10T, was found in one lymphoma sample, affecting the N-terminal region far from the thalidomide-binding CULT domain. No mutations were identified that would plausibly make canine cancer cells more susceptible to thalidomide than normal cells. In human multiple myeloma, somatic CRBN mutations are likewise reported to be neutral or to confer resistance, never enhanced sensitivity.</p>
<p>These genetic findings cast a revealing light on the veterinary literature. Thalidomide has been tested in dogs with splenic hemangiosarcoma, mammary carcinoma, lung carcinoma, lymphoma and multiple myeloma, usually in combination with other therapies, making efficacy difficult to assess. One recent multicentre retrospective study reported that 71 percent of seven dogs with relapsed multiple myeloma maintained or achieved complete remission on thalidomide as a single-agent rescue therapy, with moderate lethargy in two dogs as the only recorded side effect. Strikingly, a 53-week toxicology study in beagles using doses up to 1,000 milligrams per kilogram daily, roughly fifty times the human clinical dose for a ten-kilogram dog, found no clinically significant adverse effects, no hematological or biochemical changes and no evidence of the peripheral neuropathy that plagues human patients. The authors argue that this remarkable tolerance is itself a warning sign: a drug with no side effects at massive doses may simply have no pharmacological activity.</p>
<p>There are caveats. The sedative effect of thalidomide appears to be independent of cereblon, and one canine study reported reduced vascular endothelial growth factor staining in metastatic tissue from treated dogs, hinting that anti-angiogenic mechanisms independent of the CRBN-CUL4-RBX1-DDB1 complex might operate in dogs. A pharmacokinetic study in tumor-bearing dogs also reported a range of clinical signs, though the authors of the new analysis note these could reflect advanced cancer rather than drug toxicity. The researchers are careful not to claim that thalidomide is definitively useless in dogs; rather, they conclude that the molecular function of the drug in this species must be directly investigated before its therapeutic role in canine cancer can be understood or justified.</p>
<p>Beyond its immediate veterinary implications, the study is a compelling demonstration of how publicly available genomic data can inform clinical pharmacology. Because DNA-damaging chemotherapy agents tend to work comparably across humans and dogs, veterinary oncologists have reasonably borrowed human anticancer drugs. But for targeted agents such as thalidomide, whose action depends on the precise structure of a single protein, species differences in that target can silently nullify the drug&#8217;s effect. Given thalidomide&#8217;s tragic history and its strict regulation in human medicine, the authors advocate that molecular evidence of function should be established before the drug is used therapeutically in dogs, a lesson that applies equally to the growing arsenal of cereblon-targeting protein degraders now entering human clinical development.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Genetic variation in the canine cereblon protein and its implications for thalidomide therapy in dogs with cancer</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Genetic evidence supports that thalidomide should not be used therapeutically in dogs</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Arendt, M. L., &amp; Meadows, J. R. S. (2026). Genetic evidence supports that thalidomide should not be used therapeutically in dogs. <em>Veterinary Oncology, 3</em>(1), Article 14. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s44356-026-00067-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s44356-026-00067-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s44356-026-00067-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s44356-026-00067-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> thalidomide, cereblon, CRBN, dogs, canine cancer, veterinary oncology, comparative genomics, neo-substrates, ubiquitin ligase, drug repurposing, teratogenicity, Dog10K</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">197456</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
