<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>coronal jets &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/coronal-jets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 09:55:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Twisted Solar Null Points Can Become Kink-Unstable, Analytical Study Finds</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/twisted-solar-null-points-can-become-kink-unstable-analytical-study-finds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant Pearson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 09:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alfvénic growth rates in solar plasmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coronal jets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current sheets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deformation of magnetic fields leading to current sheet formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kink instability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kink instability in solar magnetic fields]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kruskal-Shafranov stability threshold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic null points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic reconnection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic reconnection in the solar corona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetohydrodynamic energy principle in solar physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetohydrodynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Corona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar flare initiation mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar flares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar jet and flare dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar magnetic null points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three-dimensional magnetic reconnection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torsional fan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torsional spine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torsional spine and fan magnetic geometries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twisted magnetic flux tubes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=328628</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An analytical Solar Physics study finds that sufficiently twisted torsional spine and fan magnetic null points can develop Alfvénic m=1 kink instability, deform strongly and create current sheets where reconnection may follow.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An analytical study of solar magnetic null points finds that sufficiently twisted configurations can become unstable to the m=1 kink mode, growing at Alfvénic rates and strongly deforming the magnetic geometry. The authors report that the deformation can create current sheets where subsequent magnetic reconnection may substantially change the field’s topology. The results appear in <em>Solar Physics</em> as Volume 301, article 160.</p>
<p>The study focuses on three-dimensional magnetic reconnection at null points in the solar corona, a process associated in the research with flares, jets and rapid restructuring of coronal magnetic fields. Two idealized magnetic-field geometries are examined: the torsional spine and the torsional fan. In both models, the central result is the same. Once the azimuthal magnetic-field amplitude is sufficiently large, the total twist exceeds the Kruskal–Shafranov threshold of 2π, and the configuration becomes kink-unstable.</p>
<p>To derive the behavior of these configurations, the researchers use the ideal magnetohydrodynamic energy principle. Their analysis treats line-tied cylindrical flux tubes and takes the static limit of the equilibrium flows. Within this framework, the linear growth rates show that both the torsional spine and torsional fan are susceptible to the m=1 kink mode. The instability develops with Alfvénic growth rates, indicating a rapid evolution in the model rather than a slow static deformation.</p>
<p>The modeled instability sharply distorts the original null-point geometry and produces current sheets. Those sheets provide sites where magnetic reconnection can subsequently occur, potentially causing substantial changes in magnetic topology. The authors therefore interpret the results as a possible natural route by which twisted null-point configurations in the solar corona evolve into kink-unstable states. They propose that this mechanism may help trigger impulsive energy release and topological restructuring associated with solar flares, jets and coronal-heating events.</p>
<p>Because this is an analytical study based on idealized magnetic-field models, the findings establish behavior within the model’s assumptions rather than directly demonstrating the evolution of a particular solar event. The authors’ connection to flares, jets and coronal heating is a model-based implication. The analysis also depends on its treatment of line-tied cylindrical flux tubes, the ideal magnetohydrodynamic framework and the static limit of equilibrium flows, which define the scope of the reported instability and growth rates.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Analytical modeling of ideal kink instability in twisted solar magnetic null points</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Kink Instability of Torsional Spine and Fan Magnetic Null Points</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Hosseinpour, M. (2026). Kink Instability of Torsional Spine and Fan Magnetic Null Points. <em>Solar Physics, 301</em>(10), Article 160. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-026-02757-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-026-02757-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-026-02757-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11207-026-02757-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> solar corona, magnetic null points, kink instability, magnetic reconnection, torsional spine, torsional fan, magnetohydrodynamics, current sheets, solar flares, coronal jets, Kink, Instability</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">328628</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shear Instability Itself Can Twist Solar Jet Magnetic Fields, Study Finds</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/shear-instability-itself-can-twist-solar-jet-magnetic-fields-study-finds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katie Riggs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 15:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coronal jets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[formation of helical solar coronal jets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gauge invariance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideal incompressible MHD in astrophysical phenomena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of shear-induced instabilities on magnetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of fluid instabilities on magnetic field topology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelvin-Helmholtz instability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in magnetized plasma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic field twist and stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic flux ropes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic helicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic helicity generation in solar jets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetohydrodynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetohydrodynamics analysis of plasma flows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MHD instabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plasma flow instabilities and magnetic energy storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plasma Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of shear instabilities in solar corona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shear flow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shear layer dynamics in astrophysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Corona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space plasma]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=238656</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new analytical study shows that the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in magnetized plasma intrinsically generates magnetic helicity, potentially supplying the twist observed in solar coronal jets.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most familiar instabilities in fluid dynamics may be doing far more than shredding flows into vortices. A new analytical study published in Astrophysics and Space Science argues that the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability, the same wave-growth mechanism that ruffles wind-blown water surfaces and rolls up clouds, can actively generate magnetic helicity in a magnetized plasma. Magnetic helicity is a measure of how much a magnetic field is twisted, knotted, and linked with itself, and it is a quantity that astrophysicists track carefully because it controls how magnetic structures store energy, become unstable, and eventually erupt. The result, derived by Mahboub Hosseinpour of the University of Tabriz, suggests that a process long viewed as mainly disruptive may quietly supply the twist that keeps solar coronal jets helical and stable.</p>
<p>The mathematical heart of the work lies in a careful treatment of the linearized equations of ideal, incompressible magnetohydrodynamics in a 2.5-dimensional configuration, meaning that the equilibrium quantities vary in only one direction while the perturbations are allowed to depend on all three spatial coordinates. Hosseinpour considers a shear layer in which a plasma flow slides past a magnetized background, the classic setup for the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. The key insight is that the operator governing the instability in this magnetized system is neither self-adjoint nor normal. In plain terms, the eigenmodes that describe the growing ripples do not behave like the well-behaved orthogonal modes of a simple vibrating string. Instead, they carry a complex phase asymmetry across the shear layer, with different parts of the wave pattern shifted in phase relative to one another in a way that a symmetric, self-adjoint operator would never produce.</p>
<p>That phase asymmetry turns out to have a striking physical consequence. When the perturbed electric field and the perturbed vector potential of the reference potential field are combined in the flux integral that governs relative magnetic helicity, the time average over an oscillation cycle no longer cancels to zero. The growing instability therefore drives a nonzero, time-averaged helicity flux through the boundaries of any subvolume that encloses the shear layer. Because the system is closed, this flux does not create helicity from nothing in a global sense; rather, it redistributes magnetic helicity within the system, pumping it from the shear interface into the surrounding jet boundary region. The paper derives a closed-form analytical expression for this helicity injection rate, a result that required a meticulous gauge-invariant formulation of the relative helicity evolution equation.</p>
<p>Gauge invariance is not a technical nicety here but the foundation of the claim. Magnetic helicity is defined through integrals involving the vector potential, and the vector potential is only defined up to a gauge transformation, an arbitrary redefinition that leaves the physical magnetic field unchanged. A sloppy gauge choice can make a helicity flux appear or disappear artificially. The study works through the derivation in detail, choosing the gauge on the boundaries of the slab so that the vector potential of the perturbed field matches that of the potential reference field in the components tangential to the boundary. With that choice, the volume terms in the helicity evolution equation vanish identically in ideal magnetohydrodynamics, because the electric field is perpendicular to the magnetic field, and the entire budget reduces to a surface integral of the cross product between the perturbed electric field and the vector potential of the reference field. The surviving expression is unambiguously gauge-invariant, which means the helicity injection it predicts is a genuine physical effect rather than an artifact of the bookkeeping.</p>
<p>The mathematical machinery behind the result is equally careful. Starting from the linearized momentum and induction equations, the analysis eliminates the total pressure perturbation and reduces the full system to a single second-order ordinary differential equation for the velocity perturbation normal to the shear layer. For the specific equilibrium considered, in which the flow profile is proportional to the magnetic field profile, a clever change of variables collapses the equation into a compact form that can be solved with a matched asymptotic expansion. In the outer regions far from the shear layer, where the equilibrium quantities are effectively constant, the equation reduces to a simple Helmholtz equation. Matching the inner and outer solutions then yields the eigenfunctions whose complex phase structure, as the paper shows, is precisely what generates the helicity flux.</p>
<p>To test whether the effect matters in the real universe, Hosseinpour applies the theory to solar coronal jets, narrow, spire-shaped eruptions that shoot plasma along magnetic field lines out of the solar corona. Observations frequently show Kelvin-Helmholtz instability developing at the interface between the fast-moving jet and the slower ambient plasma, appearing as rolled-up vortices along the jet boundary. Using representative jet parameters, a background magnetic field of roughly 10 gauss, a shear-flow Alfvén Mach number of about 1.36, a shear layer half-width of approximately 100 kilometers, and a perturbation wavelength near 10,000 kilometers, the calculation predicts that the linear instability injects magnetic helicity at a rate of about 10 to the 14 webers squared per second into the jet boundary region.</p>
<p>That number becomes meaningful when integrated over the growth time of the instability. The e-folding time, the interval over which the perturbation amplitude grows by a factor of e, is estimated at roughly 8 seconds for these parameters. Over such an interval, the accumulated helicity reaches a magnitude comparable to the twist inferred from observations of active-region jets. This is the most provocative claim of the paper: the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability alone may provide enough magnetic helicity to account for the helical structure and the resulting stability of coronal jets. If correct, it would resolve a persistent puzzle in solar physics, namely where the twist in these structures comes from, and it would elevate the instability from a mere source of turbulence to an active agent in structuring the corona.</p>
<p>The broader implications extend well beyond the Sun. Kelvin-Helmholtz instability is ubiquitous wherever fast plasma flows shear past slower ones, from the flanks of Earth&#8217;s magnetosphere, where rolled-up vortices have been observed to transport solar wind into the magnetosphere, to coronal streamers, prominence bubbles, and the boundaries of astrophysical jets on far larger scales. Magnetic helicity conservation and transport are central to dynamo theory, to the build-up of coronal mass ejections, and to the self-organization of laboratory plasmas. A mechanism that generates helicity flux at any sheared magnetized interface therefore touches a remarkably wide swath of plasma physics, and the analytical nature of the result makes it a benchmark against which numerical simulations can be tested.</p>
<p>It is worth emphasizing the limits of the theory as presented. The derivation assumes an ideal, incompressible plasma in a 2.5-dimensional geometry, with a linear analysis valid only while the perturbations remain small. Real coronal plasmas are compressible, the instability eventually saturates and becomes turbulent, and the nonlinear phase, where vortices merge and magnetic reconnection may set in, lies beyond the reach of the linear eigenmode calculation. The author notes that no datasets were generated or analyzed in the study, underscoring that this is a purely theoretical contribution whose predictions now await observational or numerical scrutiny. Still, the elegance of the result is hard to deny: a closed-form, gauge-invariant expression showing that the very act of shearing a magnetized flow imprints twist on the magnetic field. If future observations confirm that coronal jets acquire their helical structure on the timescales predicted, textbooks may need to add a new entry to the list of ways the universe winds up its magnetic fields, and it will be one written by an instability that scientists have been studying for more than a century and a half.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Generation of magnetic helicity by the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in magnetized plasma and its application to solar coronal jets</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> On the generation of magnetic helicity by the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in 2.5D incompressible MHD</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Hosseinpour, M. (2026). On the generation of magnetic helicity by the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in 2.5D incompressible MHD. <em>Astrophysics and Space Science, 371</em>(10), Article 115. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-026-04648-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-026-04648-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-026-04648-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10509-026-04648-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> magnetic helicity, Kelvin-Helmholtz instability, magnetohydrodynamics, solar corona, coronal jets, plasma physics, shear flow, MHD instabilities, solar physics, gauge invariance, magnetic flux ropes, space plasma</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">238656</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
