<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>conditional knockout mice &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/conditional-knockout-mice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:49:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Oxygen Shapes the Developing Cortex, but HIF-2α Turns Out Not to Be the Messenger</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/oxygen-shapes-the-developing-cortex-but-hif-2%ce%b1-turns-out-not-to-be-the-messenger/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cassandra Pierce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cerebral cortex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cerebral cortex formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conditional knockout mice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cortical development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cortical neurogenesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developmental neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic regulation of brain development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIF-1α in neural development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIF-2α]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hyperoxia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypoxia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypoxia and brain maturation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypoxia-inducible factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neural Stem Cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurogenesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxygen as a signaling molecule in neurodevelopment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxygen gradient in embryonic brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxygen signaling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxygen signaling in brain development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physioxia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLOS One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of oxygen in neural stem cell behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stem cell regulation in cortex]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=273883</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new mouse study shows that oxygen levels strongly influence cortical development, but the oxygen sensor HIF-2α is not the mediator of these effects.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oxygen is usually cast in the brain as a fuel, the invisible gas that keeps neurons firing and mitochondria humming. But over the past two decades, developmental neuroscientists have come to appreciate a second, subtler role: oxygen acts as a signaling molecule, one whose concentration fluctuates naturally as an embryo grows and whose levels can steer the behavior of the stem cells that build the cerebral cortex. The developing mammalian brain is anything but uniformly oxygenated. Early in gestation, the embryonic brain exists in a state of profound hypoxia, and as the placental circulation matures and vascular networks penetrate the neural tissue, oxygen tensions rise and shift in dynamic patterns. These changing oxygen landscapes are now understood to be part of the developmental program itself, not merely a background condition that the growing brain must tolerate.</p>
<p>The best-characterized translator of oxygen signals into genetic instructions is hypoxia-inducible factor 1α, or HIF-1α, a transcription factor that accumulates when oxygen is scarce and activates a broad program of genes involved in angiogenesis, glycolytic metabolism, and cell survival. HIF-1α has been implicated in nearly every stage of cortical development, from the maintenance of neural stem cells in the ventricular zone to the timing of neuronal differentiation and the migration of newborn neurons into their final laminar positions. Yet HIF-1α has a close sibling, HIF-2α, encoded by the EPAS1 gene, which binds a nearly identical DNA motif and partners with the same HIF-1β subunit. Because the two isoforms overlap so heavily in their downstream targets, a persistent question has hung over the field: if oxygen shapes cortical development through HIF signaling, which of the two isoforms is actually doing the work?</p>
<p>A new study published in PLOS One by Jennifer Lanto, Laura Rohmann, Tim Theege, Valeriia Abramenko, Lisa Große, Andreas Madlener, Julia Anna Elisabeth Neitzel, Alexander Storch, and Franz Markert set out to answer that question directly, and the answer it delivers is a decisive negative for HIF-2α. Using conditional knockout mice in which the HIF-2α gene was deleted specifically in neural tissue, the team exposed pregnant dams and their developing fetuses to three distinct oxygen environments and then examined the resulting cortical architecture in detail. Their findings, while confirming that oxygen powerfully modulates cortical development, rule out HIF-2α as the mediator of those effects, redirecting attention toward other oxygen-dependent mechanisms that remain to be identified.</p>
<p>The experimental design was deliberately ambitious in its coverage of the physiological oxygen range. Starting at embryonic day 14.5, a stage at which the cerebral cortex is in the midst of its most intense neurogenic activity, the researchers maintained the animals for 48 hours under one of three conditions: maternal hypoxia at 10 percent oxygen, physioxia at ambient 21 percent oxygen, or hyperoxia at 75 percent oxygen. This window matters. Between E14.5 and E16.5, the cortex is generating deep-layer projection neurons, including the layer IV and layer V populations that will form the output highways of the neocortex, while the upper-layer neurons that define the more recently evolved superficial strata are just beginning to appear. Perturbing oxygen across this interval is therefore a sensitive probe of the mechanisms that govern cortical lamination and neurogenesis.</p>
<p>When the researchers analyzed the E16.5 fetuses by immunohistochemistry, the oxygen manipulations produced clear and interpretable effects. Markers of newborn neurons, detected through BrdU incorporation, and of layer-specific neuronal populations, identified through the transcription factors Tbr1 for layer IV, Ctip2 for layer V, and Satb2 for upper-layer neurons, all shifted in response to altered oxygen. The most striking observation concerned hyperoxia, which particularly increased the number of Ctip2-positive, Tbr1-negative layer V neurons in the E16.5 fetuses. In other words, breathing air enriched with oxygen pushed the developing cortex toward an expanded production of a specific deep-layer neuronal subtype, a measurable remodeling of the cortical output architecture driven purely by the ambient gas mixture.</p>
<p>Against this backdrop of oxygen sensitivity, the HIF-2α knockout results came as a genuine surprise. Neither the number of newborn neurons nor the number of layer-specific neurons was affected by the loss of HIF-2α, regardless of whether the animals carried the deletion under the Emx1 promoter, which targets the cortical primordium, or the Nestin promoter, which targets broader neural stem and progenitor populations. The oxygen-related effects on neural stem cells and neuroprogenitor cells observed in the E16.5 fetuses likewise persisted without any detectable contribution from HIF-2α. Whatever oxygen was doing to the developing cortex, it was not doing it through this transcription factor, despite the molecule&#8217;s established role as a bona fide oxygen sensor in other tissues and developmental contexts.</p>
<p>To probe the question from a second angle, the team turned to an in vitro system in which neural stem cells could be cultured under controlled oxygen tensions. Here again the oxygen effect was unmistakable: the expansion and stem cell maintenance of neural stem cells were accelerated under physioxia at 3 percent oxygen compared with hyperoxia at 21 percent oxygen. This result is consistent with a growing body of literature suggesting that the low oxygen tensions characteristic of the embryonic niche are not a stress to be overcome but an actively favorable environment for stem cell self-renewal. Yet, mirroring the in vivo findings, HIF-2α was not involved under either condition. The stem cell response to oxygen tension operated independently of the isoform, reinforcing the conclusion drawn from the intact animals.</p>
<p>The implications of this double negative are worth unpacking. On one hand, the study strengthens the case that oxygen is a genuine developmental signal in the cortex, capable of altering the balance of neuronal subtypes produced during neurogenesis and modulating the behavior of the stem cells that supply them. On the other hand, it removes HIF-2α from the list of candidate mediators, at least for the developmental window and cell populations examined. The field is left with a sharpened question: if not HIF-2α, then what? The obvious remaining candidate is HIF-1α, whose involvement in cortical development is already well documented, but the authors&#8217; findings also leave open the possibility of HIF-independent oxygen sensing pathways, including those involving prolyl hydroxylase domain enzymes, oxygen-sensitive ion channels, reactive oxygen species signaling, or metabolic reprogramming that does not route through canonical HIF transcription factors at all.</p>
<p>There are also important caveats and boundaries to the conclusion. The study focused on a specific developmental window, E14.5 to E16.5 in the mouse, and on the cortical neuroepithelium targeted by the Emx1 and Nestin promoters. It remains possible that HIF-2α plays a role at earlier embryonic stages, in other brain regions, or in cell types outside the targeted lineages. Conditional knockout strategies, for all their power, also leave open the possibility of compensatory upregulation of HIF-1α in the absence of HIF-2α, a scenario that could mask a genuine requirement for the deleted isoform. These are the standard qualifications of developmental genetics, and they do not diminish the central result: within the tested parameters, the oxygen-dependent modulation of cortical neurogenesis proceeds normally without HIF-2α.</p>
<p>For researchers working on cortical development, the study is a reminder that the oxygen signaling landscape of the embryonic brain is more complex than the HIF-centric model suggests, and that negative results can be as informative as positive ones. For the broader audience fascinated by how the brain takes shape, the work offers a vivid illustration of a principle that developmental biology keeps reasserting: the environment in which an organ grows is part of its blueprint. The air a pregnant mouse breathes, at concentrations spanning from 10 percent to 75 percent oxygen, can measurably alter the composition of her offspring&#8217;s cortex within 48 hours. Decoding exactly how that environmental information reaches the genome, now with HIF-2α crossed off the list of suspects, is the task the field must take up next.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> The role of hypoxia-inducible factor 2α in oxygen-dependent regulation of cortical brain development in mice</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Hypoxia-inducible factor 2α does not regulate cortical brain development</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Lanto, J., Rohmann, L., Theege, T., Abramenko, V., Große, L., Madlener, A., Neitzel, J. A. E., Storch, A., &amp; Markert, F. (2026). Hypoxia-inducible factor 2α does not regulate cortical brain development. <em>PLOS One, 21</em>(10), e0359507. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359507" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359507</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359507" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1371/journal.pone.0359507</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> HIF-2α, cortical development, oxygen signaling, neural stem cells, neurogenesis, hypoxia, hyperoxia, physioxia, conditional knockout mice, cerebral cortex, developmental neuroscience, PLOS One</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">273883</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Faulty Epigenetic Switch Disrupts Brain Cell Cycles and Drives White Matter Defects in Autism-Linked Disorders</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/faulty-epigenetic-switch-disrupts-brain-cell-cycles-and-drives-white-matter-defects-in-autism-linked-disorders/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliet Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 22:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autism spectrum disorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chromatin regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conditional knockout mice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consequences of]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epigenetic gene regulation in neurodevelopmental disorders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epigenetic switches and neural cell cycle disruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epigenetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic variants causing autism spectrum disorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H3K4me3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[histone modification and myelin production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitotic spindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular mechanisms of white matter defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRI detection of white matter abnormalities in autism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSL2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSL2 gene mutations and their impact on brain development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myelination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neurodevelopmental Disorders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurodevelopmental syndromes linked to epigenetic dysregulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oligodendrocyte precursor cell dysfunction in autism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oligodendrocytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of DNA packaging genes in brain wiring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white matter]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=250053</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New research shows that pathogenic variants in the chromatin regulator MSL2 disrupt oligodendrocyte precursor cell division and myelination through loss of H3K4me3, explaining the white matter defects seen in children with neurodevelopmental disorders.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A single gene that helps package DNA inside cells has emerged as a surprising linchpin of brain wiring, and when it goes wrong, the consequences ripple through the entire architecture of the developing brain. In a study published in Experimental &amp; Molecular Medicine, an international team of researchers traced how pathogenic variants in MSL2, a core component of a histone-modifying complex, sabotage the production of myelin, the fatty insulation that lets electrical signals race along nerve fibers. The work connects a rare neurodevelopmental syndrome to a precise molecular failure inside oligodendrocyte precursor cells, the stem-like cells responsible for wrapping axons in myelin, and it does so with a level of mechanistic detail that has been missing from the field.</p>
<p>The clinical starting point came from three patients with neurodevelopmental disorders who carried damaging MSL2 variants. Two harbored protein-truncating variants, one a de novo frameshift and one a stop-gain mutation with undetermined inheritance, while the third carried a de novo 83-kilobase microdeletion spanning both MSL2 and the neighboring PCCB gene. All three children presented with moderate to severe intellectual disability, language impairment, and motor delay, and two showed autism or autistic features. Critically, magnetic resonance imaging revealed white matter abnormalities in every patient, ranging from a thin corpus callosum and punctate frontal hyperintensities in the oldest patient to diffuse symmetrical T2 hyperintensity, ventricular enlargement, and widespread polymicrogyria in a seven-month-old infant. The consistency of these imaging findings across patients with different mutation types underscored white matter vulnerability as a hallmark of MSL2-related disease.</p>
<p>To probe what the variants actually do to cells, the team turned to immortalized lymphocytes available from the patient carrying the microdeletion. Western blotting and immunofluorescence showed markedly reduced MSL2 protein compared with four age- and sex-matched healthy controls, and the levels of two histone marks that MSL2 helps regulate, H4K16ac and H3K4me3, trended downward in the patient&#8217;s cells. These marks are chemical embellishments on histone proteins that flag chromatin as open and transcriptionally active, so their reduction signaled that the mutation genuinely impairs MSL2&#8217;s epigenetic function rather than merely removing one copy of the gene. The finding gave the researchers a molecular fingerprint to hunt for in the brain.</p>
<p>That hunt required a new animal model, because mice lacking Msl2 from conception die as embryos, masking any role the gene plays in specific cell types. The team instead crossed mice carrying a floxed Msl2 allele with Olig1-Cre mice, deleting a critical exon that encodes both the N-terminal RING finger domain and the C-terminal CXC domain, thereby producing a loss-of-function mutation exclusively in the oligodendrocyte lineage. Quantitative PCR and western blotting confirmed that Msl2 expression collapsed in purified precursor cells from these conditional knockouts, while MSL2 protein remained intact in mature neurons, proving the deletion was cell-type specific. The researchers also tracked where and when MSL2 acts normally, finding that Msl2 transcripts were far more abundant in white matter structures such as the corpus callosum and optic nerve than in cortex at postnatal day 7, peaked in the first two postnatal weeks, and were highest in newly formed oligodendrocytes before declining in mature myelin-producing cells.</p>
<p>What happened when the gene was removed was striking. The density of SOX10-positive oligodendrocyte lineage cells was normal at birth but fell significantly from postnatal day 7 through day 50 in both the corpus callosum and the cortex. The proportion of CC1-positive mature oligodendrocytes dropped, myelin basic protein levels declined sharply, and electron microscopy at postnatal day 40 revealed fewer myelinated axons with thinner myelin sheaths and higher g-ratios, a quantitative measure of reduced myelin thickness. TUNEL assays ruled out increased cell death, but EdU incorporation showed far fewer proliferating precursor cells in the mutants, and fewer of the cells that did incorporate EdU went on to become MBP-positive oligodendrocytes. In purified cultures treated with thyroid hormone to drive differentiation, Msl2-deficient cells showed intrinsically reduced capacity to become CNPase- and MBP-positive oligodendrocytes, and an inducible knockout triggered at the onset of differentiation still impaired maturation, indicating that MSL2 is required both for proper cell division and for the initiation of differentiation.</p>
<p>The behavioral fallout mirrored the cellular damage. In the three-chamber sociability test, mutant mice showed no preference for a stranger mouse over an empty chamber and failed to recognize social novelty, while the resident-intruder test revealed strong social avoidance and the self-grooming test revealed repetitive behavior, together recapitulating the core diagnostic domains of autism spectrum disorder. Open field and elevated plus maze tests showed heightened anxiety, the tail suspension test and sucrose preference test indicated depressive-like states, and notably, novel object recognition remained intact, suggesting that cognition was spared even as social and emotional behaviors were disrupted. This constellation of social withdrawal, repetitive grooming, and comorbid anxiety and depression makes the conditional knockout a potentially valuable model for studying how epigenetically regulated myelin contributes to autism.</p>
<p>The mechanistic core of the study came from integrated transcriptomic and epigenomic profiling of purified precursor cells. RNA sequencing identified 1,166 genes upregulated and 327 downregulated after Msl2 loss, and gene ontology analysis of the downregulated set pointed squarely at cell cycle, cell division, mitotic spindle, and myelin sheath terms. Among the affected genes were Aspm, a microcephaly-associated spindle assembly factor; Tpx2, which nucleates spindle microtubules; and Bub1b, a kinase essential for the spindle-assembly checkpoint. Cell synchronization experiments made the consequence concrete: while nearly 70 percent of phospho-histone H3-positive control cells reached metaphase, only about 25 percent of mutant cells did, with most stalling in prophase or prometaphase and metaphase cells displaying loose chromosome compaction, triple or multipolar spindles, and twisted spindle architectures. Meanwhile, the upregulated genes were enriched for inflammatory response, innate immune response, and cytokine activity, with chemokines such as Cxcl1, Cxcl2, Ccl4, and Ccl20 elevated, hinting that MSL2 loss may endow precursor cells with immunomodulatory properties that could exacerbate neuroinflammation.</p>
<p>Epigenomic mapping revealed which histone mark carries the weight. ChIP-seq for H3K4me3 showed that although the genomic distribution of peaks was broadly preserved, peak signals dropped dramatically near transcription start sites after Msl2 deletion, and genes losing the mark were enriched for myelination, oligodendrocyte differentiation, cell proliferation, and mitotic G2/M transition terms. Cross-referencing with the transcriptome showed that 177 genes with reduced H3K4me3 were also transcriptionally downregulated, accounting for nearly 36 percent of all downregulated genes. By contrast, H4K16ac, the canonical product of the MSL-MOF complex, was only mildly reduced and overlapped with just 12 percent of downregulated genes, while H2BK120ub, an indirect target of MSL2&#8217;s ubiquitin ligase activity, showed minimal concordance with either H3K4me3 loss or transcriptional change. The data collectively reposition H3K4me3, rather than H4K16ac, as the dominant downstream effector of MSL2 in oligodendrocyte lineage cells.</p>
<p>Proteomics added an unexpected twist to the mechanism. Co-immunoprecipitation coupled with mass spectrometry identified 160 MSL2-interacting proteins in precursor cells, including the expected partner KAT8, also known as MOF, but also ASH2L and RBBP5, the core subunits of the COMPASS-like H3K4 methyltransferase complex, and SOX10, the master transcription factor of the oligodendrocyte lineage. Western blotting on MSL2 immunoprecipitates validated all of these interactions. This suggests a previously unrecognized model in which MSL2 physically recruits the H3K4 methylation machinery to myelination and cell cycle genes, with SOX10 potentially guiding the complex to its oligodendrocyte-specific targets, independent of MSL2&#8217;s E3 ubiquitin ligase activity toward H2B.</p>
<p>The implications extend well beyond a rare syndrome. Because MSL2 governs the transition from proliferating precursor cells to differentiating oligodendrocytes rather than lineage commitment itself, modulating MSL2 complex activity could, in principle, enhance myelination programs not only in MSL2-related neurodevelopmental disorders but also in conditions involving demyelination. The study&#8217;s authors caution that more than 60 percent of downregulated genes did not show significant H3K4me3 reduction, leaving room for additional mechanisms such as H3K79 methylation or MSL2&#8217;s proposed role in protecting regulatory regions from DNA methylation. Still, by linking patient genetics, cell-autonomous mouse genetics, cell cycle biology, and chromatin profiling into a single coherent story, the work transforms MSL2 from a gene of uncertain function into a defined epigenetic regulator of the brain&#8217;s insulation, and it offers the white matter defects seen on MRI in affected children their first clear molecular explanation.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> The role of the chromatin regulator MSL2 in oligodendrocyte precursor cell cycle control, H3K4me3-mediated gene regulation, and white matter defects in neurodevelopmental disorders.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> MSL2 orchestrates oligodendrocyte precursor cell cycle via H3K4me3 to prevent white matter defects in neurodevelopmental disorders</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Yuan, J., Dong, Y., Zhang, K., Wei, Z., Zhang, Z., Zhang, M., Luo, S., Jiang, S., Peng, Y., Wu, X., Yvan, H., Goel, H., Zhang, E., The Australian Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN-Aus), Guo, H., Wu, S., &amp; Zhao, X. (2026). MSL2 orchestrates oligodendrocyte precursor cell cycle via H3K4me3 to prevent white matter defects in neurodevelopmental disorders. <em>Experimental &amp;amp; Molecular Medicine</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-026-01858-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-026-01858-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-026-01858-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s12276-026-01858-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> MSL2, oligodendrocytes, H3K4me3, myelination, neurodevelopmental disorders, autism spectrum disorder, white matter, epigenetics, cell cycle, mitotic spindle, conditional knockout mice, chromatin regulation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">250053</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Loss of a Single Protein Derails Brain Development and Drives Autism-Like Behavior in Mice</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/loss-of-a-single-protein-derails-brain-development-and-drives-autism-like-behavior-in-mice/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cassandra Pierce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 12:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autism spectrum disorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autism-like behaviors in animal models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain development in mice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cerebral cortex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conditional knockout mice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cortical lamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cortical organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developmental delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic mechanisms of neurodevelopmental disorders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of gene deletion on brain structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MAPK pathway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mouse models of autism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neural progenitor cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neural stem cell regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurodevelopmental disorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurogenesis and neural differentiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PI3K/AKT pathway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of single proteins in brain development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBAP2L]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBAP2L gene function]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wnt signaling]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=238096</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New research shows that the protein UBAP2L is essential for neural progenitor cell division, and that its loss in mice produces cortical malformations and autism-like behavioral deficits.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A single gene, quietly working inside the neural stem cells that build the mammalian cortex, has emerged as a critical gatekeeper of brain development. In a study published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, researchers led by Jieqiong Tan of Central South University, together with colleagues at institutions across China, report that mice lacking the protein UBAP2L in their nervous systems develop smaller bodies, structurally disorganized cortices, and behavioral deficits that strikingly resemble core features of autism spectrum disorder. The findings provide the most direct experimental evidence to date that UBAP2L is not merely associated with neurodevelopmental disorders in human genetics studies but is functionally required for the construction of a healthy cerebral cortex.</p>
<p>UBAP2L first attracted attention from geneticists through the patients themselves. Rare variants in the UBAP2L gene have been repeatedly identified in individuals diagnosed with neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder, a condition that affects communication, social interaction, and learning in millions of families worldwide. What those human genetic findings could not establish, however, was mechanism. Correlation between a mutated gene and a disorder does not reveal whether the protein acts during embryonic brain construction, in mature neurons, or in both. The new study was designed to answer precisely that question by removing the gene selectively from the developing nervous system of laboratory mice and watching what breaks.</p>
<p>The team used a well-established genetic engineering strategy known as the Nestin-Cre conditional knockout system. Nestin is a marker gene active in neural stem and progenitor cells, so pairing it with the Cre recombinase enzyme allows researchers to delete Ubap2l specifically and efficiently in the embryonic nervous system while leaving the gene intact everywhere else in the body. The researchers generated two groups of animals: heterozygous mutants, called cHET, carrying one functional copy of the gene, and homozygous conditional knockouts, called cKO, in which both copies were deleted from neural tissue. This design also mirrors the human genetic situation, where many patients carry a single damaged copy.</p>
<p>The anatomical consequences were unambiguous. Adult cKO mice weighed significantly less than their normal littermates, and histological examination of their brains revealed a marked reduction in the number of mature cortical neurons. The cortex, the folded outer layer of the brain responsible for perception, cognition, and voluntary movement, is built in an inside-out sequence: the earliest-born neurons settle in the deepest layers while successive waves of newborn neurons migrate past them to form the outer layers. At embryonic day 18.5, near the end of gestation, the knockout mice showed abnormal cortical lamination, meaning this precisely choreographed layering had gone wrong. The blueprint of the cortex had been corrupted at its source.</p>
<p>Tracing the defect further back in time, the researchers examined embryos at embryonic day 14.5, the height of the cortical neurogenic period when neural progenitor cells are dividing furiously to produce the neurons that will populate the cortex. At this stage, the abundance of cortical neural progenitor cells was already reduced, and the proliferation of the remaining progenitors was impaired. In other words, the root cause of the later cortical disorganization was not a failure of neurons to migrate or survive, but a failure of the stem cell pool to expand and deliver its full quota of neurons on schedule. Fewer progenitors dividing less efficiently means fewer neurons, and fewer neurons means a thinner, mislayered cortex.</p>
<p>Behavioral testing translated the cellular damage into functional terms. The cKO mice exhibited impaired social interaction and deficits in learning and memory, phenotypes that resonate strongly with the diagnostic features of autism spectrum disorder and related neurodevelopmental conditions. Importantly, the cHET mice, with only one copy of the gene deleted, showed milder behavioral and cognitive impairments. This dose-sensitive pattern, where gene copy number tracks with symptom severity, is a hallmark of many neurodevelopmental disorders and strengthens the argument that the mouse model faithfully recapitulates the human condition associated with UBAP2L variants.</p>
<p>To understand what was happening inside the cells, the researchers performed transcriptomic profiling, sequencing the RNA of the embryonic day 14.5 cortex to measure the activity of every gene. The differentially expressed genes clustered around three biological themes: transcriptional regulation, neuronal differentiation, and cell proliferation, with proliferation-related genes predominantly downregulated. Pathway analysis sharpened the picture further, revealing dysregulation of three major signaling cascades known to steer brain development: the PI3K-AKT pathway, which controls cell growth and survival; the MAPK pathway, which transmits proliferative signals; and the Wnt pathway, a master regulator of embryonic patterning and progenitor behavior. The convergence of these three pathways on a single deleted gene suggests that UBAP2L sits at or near a hub coordinating the proliferative program of neural progenitors.</p>
<p>The most mechanistically revealing experiments came from direct cell-cycle analysis. By examining cell-cycle phases in the embryonic cortex and running flow cytometric analysis on UBAP2L-deficient cells in culture, the team demonstrated that loss of Ubap2l produces two distinct cell-cycle defects: the S phase, during which DNA is replicated, became abnormally shortened, and cells accumulated in the G2/M checkpoint, indicating arrest before or during mitosis. A shortened S phase raises the specter of incomplete or error-prone DNA replication, while G2/M arrest halts division altogether. Together, these defects would throttle the output of the progenitor pool exactly when the cortex can least afford it. The cell cycle, it turns out, is where UBAP2L exerts its essential function.</p>
<p>The rescue experiments delivered the study&#8217;s most compelling verdict. When the researchers re-introduced wild-type UBAP2L into the deficient cells, the cell-cycle defects were reversed, confirming that the phenotype was specifically caused by the absence of this protein rather than by collateral damage from the engineering process. Critically, however, UBAP2L variants associated with neurodevelopmental disorders in patients failed to rescue cell-cycle progression. This is the functional smoking gun: the very mutations found in affected individuals abolish the protein&#8217;s ability to support normal cell division, directly linking patient genetics to a concrete cellular failure mode.</p>
<p>The broader implications reach well beyond a single gene. UBAP2L is known to participate in RNA processing and the assembly of membraneless cellular compartments called stress granules, and this study now positions it as a bridge between the cell&#8217;s gene-expression machinery and the proliferative demands of embryonic neurogenesis. For the growing number of families carrying UBAP2L variants, the work offers a biological explanation for their children&#8217;s conditions and a defined cellular process, progenitor cell-cycle control, as a potential point of therapeutic intervention. More generally, the study adds to a compelling emerging theme in neuroscience: many autism-related genes converge not on synapses or neurotransmitters, as once assumed, but on the fundamental mechanics of how the embryonic brain builds itself, one dividing progenitor at a time.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> The role of the UBAP2L protein in neural progenitor proliferation, cortical development, and autism-related neurodevelopmental disorders</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Neural-specific UBAP2L deficiency causes developmental delay and cortical abnormalities in mice</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Hu, M., Xie, M., Qiu, C., Peng, X., Hou, H., Zhang, S., Jia, X., Wan, Z., Guo, H., Cai, M., Hu, Z., &amp; Tan, J. (2026). Neural-specific UBAP2L deficiency causes developmental delay and cortical abnormalities in mice. <em>Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-026-06416-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-026-06416-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-026-06416-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00018-026-06416-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> UBAP2L, autism spectrum disorder, neurodevelopmental disorder, cerebral cortex, neural progenitor cells, cell cycle, conditional knockout mice, PI3K-AKT pathway, MAPK pathway, Wnt signaling, cortical lamination, developmental delay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">238096</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Touch-Sensing Piezo Channels Found to Steer the Cells That Build Our Teeth</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/touch-sensing-piezo-channels-found-to-steer-the-cells-that-build-our-teeth/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Townsend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 14:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellular signaling in tooth germ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conditional knockout mice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dental pulp and odontoblast function]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dentin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dentin defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic regulation of tooth development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of mechanical forces on dental cell behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Journal of Oral Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ion channels in tissue engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanical sensing in tooth mineralization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanobiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanobiology of dentin formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanosensitive ion channels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanosensitive ion channels in oral health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanotransduction in dental tissue formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[odontoblasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piezo channels as therapeutic targets in dentistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piezo channels in tooth development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piezo1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piezo2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of Piezo1 and Piezo2 in odontogenesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tooth development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wnt signaling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wnt10a]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=235266</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers at the University of Maryland Baltimore have shown that the mechanosensitive ion channels Piezo1 and Piezo2 drive the terminal differentiation of odontoblasts into dentin-forming cells by modulating Wnt signaling, a finding that could inform therapies for dentin defects.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every tooth in the human mouth is a monument to a remarkably precise sequence of biological events. The hard outer enamel arises from the epithelial component of the embryonic tooth germ, while the underlying mesenchymal tissue gives rise to the dental pulp, the soft core of blood vessels and nerves that keeps the tooth alive. Wrapped around that pulp sits a layer of specialized cells called odontoblasts, whose entire adult purpose is to secrete the organic matrix that mineralizes into dentin, the calcified tissue that makes up the bulk of every tooth. Scientists have long understood that this choreography is written in the genome, but a growing body of evidence shows that mechanical forces, the physical pushes and pulls experienced by developing tissues, also help direct the process. A new study from the University of Maryland Baltimore now reveals, at the level of individual genes and signaling molecules, how two of the body&#8217;s most famous mechanical sensors shape the way teeth are built.</p>
<p>The sensors in question are Piezo1 and Piezo2, ion channels that open in response to mechanical stimulation and allow calcium and other charged particles to flood into cells. Since their discovery, Piezo channels have been implicated in everything from the sense of touch to blood pressure regulation, and previous work had shown that they are expressed in tooth-forming cells and participate in postnatal tooth development. What remained murky was their precise role in odontoblast differentiation, the process by which progenitor cells in the outermost layer of the dental pulp transform into mature, dentin-secreting odontoblasts. That gap in knowledge mattered, because dentin formation is the foundation of tooth structure, and defects in odontoblast maturation can produce structurally weakened teeth that are vulnerable throughout life.</p>
<p>To close that gap, a research group led by Professor Man-Kyo Chung and Dr. Xuguang Nie of the University of Maryland Baltimore turned to genetic mouse models in which the Piezo genes could be selectively deleted. Their findings, published in Volume 18, Article number 61 of the International Journal of Oral Science on 10 September 2026, provide the first in vivo demonstration that Piezo channels drive the terminal differentiation of odontoblasts, and they identify the Wnt signaling pathway as the molecular bridge between mechanical sensing and tooth formation. The work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant R35 DE030045, with additional support to researcher Kelley Huang through the R25 DE32530 Maryland Program in Dental Research Experience.</p>
<p>Explaining why the team took this approach, Professor Chung noted that although earlier studies had reported that Piezo1 and Piezo2 are expressed in tooth-forming cells, their roles in tooth development in living animals remained poorly understood. By using a conditional knockout strategy, the researchers could remove the genes at specific times and places rather than eliminating them throughout the embryo, which allowed them to focus on the cells that actually build teeth. The Wnt1-Cre2 system they employed deletes target genes specifically in cells of neural crest origin, a lineage that includes odontoblasts, giving the team a precise genetic scalpel for the job.</p>
<p>The first experiments produced a surprise. When the researchers generated mice lacking either Piezo1 or Piezo2 alone in these neural crest-derived cells, tooth development proceeded essentially normally. This result pointed to a functional redundancy between the two channels, a phenomenon that has been documented in many other tissues and biological processes, where one channel can compensate for the loss of its sibling. To test that idea, the team engineered mice lacking both genes simultaneously, creating the Piezo1/Piezo2 double knockout model that would become the centerpiece of the study.</p>
<p>At the embryonic stage, the double knockout mice still showed no obvious defects in tooth development, suggesting that the earliest steps of tooth patterning do not depend on these mechanosensitive channels. But the picture changed dramatically at birth. Newborn double knockout mice exhibited a striking reduction in odontoblast height, a hallmark of immature odontoblasts, along with decreased expression of the key proteins that define odontoblast differentiation: dentin sialophosphoprotein, known as Dspp, alkaline phosphatase, or Alpl, and collagen type 1, or Col1a1. Together, these molecular and cellular changes signaled a clear impairment of odontoblast maturation. The double knockout animals did not survive beyond the first day after birth, likely reflecting the broader importance of Piezo channels in craniofacial and systemic development, but in the tissue that could be examined at this most advanced stage of survival, dentin matrix was present only in some areas, and overall tooth development was atypical.</p>
<p>With a differentiation defect firmly established, the researchers turned to the question of mechanism. Wnt signaling is one of the master regulators of tooth development, controlling multiple stages from initiation to maturation, and previous studies had reported correlations between Wnt signaling and Piezo1 activity in a variety of biological contexts. That made the Wnt pathway an obvious suspect. The team therefore measured the expression of Wnt10a and β-catenin, two central components of the canonical Wnt signaling cascade that operates during odontoblast differentiation. In the double knockout mice, both factors were significantly downregulated, and the suppression extended downstream as well: Axin1, a known target of β-catenin signaling, was also reduced. The mechanical sensors, it appeared, were feeding directly into one of developmental biology&#8217;s most important signaling networks.</p>
<p>The most compelling evidence came from a rescue experiment. When the researchers supplied exogenous Wnt10a to the deficient mice, odontoblast differentiation and Wnt signaling were partially restored, demonstrating that the loss of Wnt activity was not merely a side effect of the differentiation failure but a causal link in the chain. In a complementary approach, the team treated pregnant wild-type mice with Yoda1, a pharmacological activator of Piezo1, and observed increased odontoblast differentiation, increased matrix deposition, and elevated expression of Wnt10a and β-catenin in the embryos. In other words, turning up the mechanical signal turned up the tooth-building program. Taken together, these experiments show that Piezo1 and Piezo2 contribute to the terminal differentiation of odontoblasts, at least in part, by modulating canonical Wnt signaling.</p>
<p>The implications of the work extend beyond basic developmental biology. Dentin malformations and inherited dentin defects, such as those seen in genetic conditions affecting dentin sialophosphoprotein and related pathways, remain difficult to treat because dentin, unlike many other tissues, cannot regenerate once the odontoblasts that formed it are lost or dysfunctional. Dr. Nie emphasized the translational potential of the findings, remarking that this is the first study to reveal the roles of Piezo1 and Piezo2 in odontoblast differentiation in an in vivo model, and that the molecular links between the Piezo channels and Wnt signaling could potentially be harnessed to develop therapeutic strategies for dentin malformations or inherited dentin defects. If pharmacological manipulation of Piezo channels, as the Yoda1 experiment suggests, can enhance odontoblast maturation and matrix deposition, similar approaches might one day strengthen dentin formation in patients with congenital tooth defects or even support regenerative dental therapies.</p>
<p>The study also adds an important chapter to the rapidly expanding field of mechanobiology, the discipline that explores how physical forces influence gene expression and cell fate. The idea that a developing tooth needs to sense its mechanical environment in order to mineralize properly is a vivid illustration of how deeply embedded mechanical signaling is in embryonic development. Odontoblasts, after all, will spend their entire postnatal lives as mechanosensitive sentinels of the tooth, detecting stimuli that travel through dentin and orchestrating responses such as tertiary dentin formation. The new findings suggest that this mechanical sensitivity is not a late addition to the odontoblast toolkit but a fundamental requirement for the cells to reach their mature, dentin-forming state in the first place. As researchers continue to map the intersections between ion channels, mechanical forces, and developmental signaling pathways, the humble tooth is proving to be a powerful model for understanding how the body translates physical cues into biological structure, one calcified matrix molecule at a time.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> The role of mechanosensitive Piezo1 and Piezo2 ion channels in odontoblast differentiation and dentin formation during tooth development</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Mechanosensitive ion channels regulate tooth development</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Mechanosensitive ion channels regulate tooth development. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1146019" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Piezo1, Piezo2, odontoblasts, dentin, tooth development, Wnt signaling, mechanosensitive ion channels, mechanobiology, conditional knockout mice, International Journal of Oral Science, dentin defects, Wnt10a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">235266</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
