<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>condition-based maintenance &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/condition-based-maintenance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 11:22:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>New Framework Sorts Rocket Parts by Failure Risk to Make Reusable Launch Vehicles Cheaper</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/new-framework-sorts-rocket-parts-by-failure-risk-to-make-reusable-launch-vehicles-cheaper/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant Pearson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 11:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerospace component reliability analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerospace engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerospace engineering cost discipline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[component failure risk assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition-based maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost-effective space launch operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failure mode and effect analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel supply system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-reliability mechanical systems in aerospace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launch costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launch vehicle lifecycle management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mission-specific component assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prognostics and health management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reliability-centered maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remaining useful life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reusability assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reusable launch vehicle maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reusable launch vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rocket engine maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rocket part durability testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space economy reusability strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space vehicle reusability design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systematic reusability evaluation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=241110</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers at Korea Aerospace University have proposed a systematic framework that classifies reusable launch vehicle components by failure risk and uses sensor-based condition monitoring to assess remaining useful life in the fuel supply system.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reusable launch vehicles have become the defining technology of the modern space economy, promising to slash the cost of reaching orbit by flying the same hardware mission after mission. Yet the economics of reusability rest on a deceptively simple question that operators must answer after every flight: which components can safely fly again, and which need attention before the next launch? A new study published in the International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences by Ho-Beom Park, Joo-Ho Choi, and Hae-Sung Yoon of Korea Aerospace University tackles this question head-on, proposing a systematic reusability assessment procedure designed to bring rigor and cost discipline to the maintenance of reusable launch vehicles, or RLVs.</p>
<p>The researchers argue that the economic promise of reusability cannot be realized unless reliability, operability, and cost-effectiveness are engineered into the vehicle from the earliest design phase. Retrofitting a maintenance philosophy onto a finished rocket, they contend, leads to inefficiency and unnecessary expense. Their starting point is an observation drawn from decades of experience with high-reliability mechanical systems such as aerospace engines: it is neither practical nor economical to re-evaluate the reusability of every single component after every mission. Some parts degrade quickly and predictably, others fail rarely, and still others show no meaningful wear at all. Treating them all identically wastes resources on components that need little scrutiny while potentially under-serving those that need the most.</p>
<p>To resolve this, the team built an integrated maintenance framework that classifies components into four categories based on the severity and frequency of their failures, using NASA engine data as the evidentiary foundation. Components are sorted into On-Condition, Hard-Time, Servicing-Lubrication, and Non-Significant groups, each carrying a corresponding level of maintenance activity. The classification approach draws on the principles of reliability-centered maintenance, a discipline formalized in the aviation industry and popularized by John Moubray&#8217;s influential 1997 work, which holds that maintenance policies should be dictated by the failure characteristics of each item rather than by a uniform schedule applied across the board.</p>
<p>The On-Condition category is the most demanding. These are components whose health cannot be guaranteed by a fixed calendar or usage limit alone, but must instead be verified through inspection and measurement before each subsequent flight. For these parts, the researchers apply condition-based maintenance, an approach in which sensors and diagnostic algorithms determine whether a component retains sufficient remaining useful life, commonly abbreviated RUL, to fly again. The Hard-Time category covers items with well-defined life limits that are replaced or overhauled after a set number of cycles regardless of apparent condition, while Servicing-Lubrication items require routine replenishment and upkeep. Non-Significant components, finally, are those whose failure history and consequences justify minimal dedicated maintenance activity.</p>
<p>As a representative case study for the On-Condition class, the authors selected the fuel supply system of a launch vehicle, the subsystem that typically demands the most intensive maintenance effort. The fuel supply system is a natural choice for such scrutiny: it comprises turbopumps, valves, lines, and pressurization hardware operating under extreme pressures, cryogenic temperatures, and violent vibration, and a failure here can be catastrophic. The paper develops a detailed scenario for assessing the effective remaining useful life of components within this system, showing how sensor data gathered during and after a flight can be fed into a condition-based maintenance workflow to produce a defensible go or no-go decision for the next launch.</p>
<p>The scenario rests on a foundation of failure mode and effect analysis, a structured engineering method for enumerating the ways a component can fail, the mechanisms behind those failures, and their consequences. By pairing this analysis with sensor-based health monitoring, the framework links each critical failure mode to observable physical indicators, such as pressure anomalies, temperature excursions, or vibration signatures, that can be tracked across flights. Prognostics and health management, the broader field to which this work contributes, has matured rapidly in recent years, with techniques ranging from Kalman filter-based fault detection to particle-filter diagnosis of rocket engine startup transients appearing throughout the recent literature on liquid propellant engines.</p>
<p>What distinguishes the Korean team&#8217;s contribution is its insistence on a complete, rational procedure rather than an isolated technique. Previous studies have advanced individual pieces of the puzzle, including model-based and data-driven simulators for rocket engine health management, multi-physics system-level modeling for electromechanical actuators, and reliability-centered maintenance frameworks designed to cope with operational uncertainty. By assembling maintenance classification, reusability assessment, and a concrete sensor-based evaluation scenario into a single coherent workflow, the new paper offers launch operators a template they can adapt to their own vehicles. The authors anticipate that this integrated procedure will enhance both the cost-effectiveness and the reliability of RLVs, directly supporting the ambitions of the so-called New Space era.</p>
<p>The stakes are considerable. Launch cost analysis has repeatedly shown that the price of reaching space is the dominant constraint on the growth of the commercial space industry, and reusable systems are the most credible path to orders-of-magnitude reductions. Regulatory frameworks are evolving in parallel, with the United States Federal Aviation Administration&#8217;s Part 450 rules establishing launch and reentry licensing requirements that implicitly demand rigorous mission assurance practices from reusable vehicle operators. Standards guidance for the structural, propulsion, mechanical, and dynamics aspects of reusable launch vehicles has been developed within the aerospace community, and studies of mission assurance standards for both expendable and reusable vehicles highlight how much depends on disciplined post-flight evaluation. A repeatable, component-level reusability assessment procedure gives operators and regulators alike a common engineering language for those decisions.</p>
<p>The research is also notable for its provenance. It results from the Commissioned Research Project on the Advancement of the Korean Launch Vehicle Program, hosted by the Korea Aerospace Research Institute with funding from the Korea AeroSpace Administration, with additional support from the National Research Foundation of Korea and the Brain Korea 21 FOUR project at Korea Aerospace University. As Korea develops its own launch capabilities, including the KSLV-II program whose 75-ton engine system has been the subject of prior reliability modeling, the transfer of maintenance science from commercial aviation into launch vehicle engineering reflects a maturing domestic space sector preparing for reusable systems of its own.</p>
<p>For the industry at large, the message of the study is that reusability is not a binary property of a rocket but a property that must be assessed, component by component, flight after flight, with the intensity of scrutiny matched to the risk each part carries. The fuel supply system, sitting at the sharp end of that risk, illustrates the approach in action: sensors watch for the signatures of degradation, condition-based maintenance converts those observations into estimates of remaining useful life, and only components with demonstrated margin are cleared to fly again. If frameworks of this kind take hold, the vision of rockets operating more like airliners, turned around quickly and cheaply with maintenance targeted precisely where the data says it is needed, moves one step closer to routine reality, and the cost curve that has already transformed access to orbit may bend further still.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Reusability assessment and condition-based maintenance of reusable launch vehicles</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Assessment Procedure of Reusability of Reusable Launch Vehicles (RLVs) and Sensor-Based Evaluation Scenario in Fuel Supply System</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Park, H.-B., Choi, J.-H., &amp; Yoon, H.-S. (2026). Assessment Procedure of Reusability of Reusable Launch Vehicles (RLVs) and Sensor-Based Evaluation Scenario in Fuel Supply System. <em>International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-026-01305-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-026-01305-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-026-01305-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s42405-026-01305-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> reusable launch vehicles, reusability assessment, condition-based maintenance, remaining useful life, fuel supply system, prognostics and health management, reliability-centered maintenance, failure mode and effect analysis, rocket engine maintenance, New Space, launch costs, aerospace engineering</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">241110</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Sensor Method Reveals Hidden Heat Inside Industrial Storage Tanks</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/new-sensor-method-reveals-hidden-heat-inside-industrial-storage-tanks/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 10:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced sensor technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition-based maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital twin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency in industrial plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat transfer coefficient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat transfer monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hidden heat detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial heat recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial process heat optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[model reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-invasive thermal imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimizing thermal energy storage systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packed-bed storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packed-bed thermal energy storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sensor placement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state estimation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal energy management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal energy storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal energy storage tanks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermocline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TU Wien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TU Wien heat sensor research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste heat recovery]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=237564</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers at TU Wien have developed an observer-based method that reconstructs the full internal temperature distribution of packed-bed thermal energy storage systems from only a few sensors, enabling efficient waste heat recovery and condition-based maintenance.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Industrial plants are, in many respects, enormous heat machines. Steelworks, cement kilns, glass furnaces and chemical reactors continuously produce vast quantities of thermal energy as a by-product of their core processes, and much of that energy simply drifts away unused. The reason is rarely a lack of will or technology; it is a mismatch in timing. Heat is generated when a process runs hot, but it is needed when a downstream step or a neighbouring facility demands it, and those moments seldom coincide. Thermal energy storage systems are designed to close exactly this gap, absorbing surplus heat at one moment and releasing it later. Among the most promising designs are packed-bed thermal energy storage systems, known in the literature as PBTES, in which hot air flows through a bed of solid particles and transfers its thermal energy directly to the storage material. When the stored heat is required, the flow direction is reversed and the energy is recovered. The approach sounds elegantly simple, yet operating such a system efficiently hides a deceptively difficult problem: nobody can see what is happening inside the tank.</p>
<p>Researchers at TU Wien have now developed a method that makes the invisible visible, at least in the mathematical sense. Their work, published in the journal Applied Thermal Engineering, demonstrates how the complete internal temperature state of a packed-bed storage system can be precisely determined during operation using only a small number of strategically placed temperature sensors. The study, which carries the title &#8216;Observer-based thermocline tracking and heat transfer coefficient estimation in packed bed thermal energy storage systems&#8217;, is a striking example of what happens when control engineering meets energy technology. Rather than attempting to measure everything, the team exploits a detailed mathematical model of the storage process to infer the quantities that no sensor can practically reach. The model, in effect, supplements the information that the physical instrumentation cannot deliver, reconstructing the full spatial temperature distribution from sparse measurements taken at the tank&#8217;s boundary regions.</p>
<p>The heart of the challenge lies in a narrow transition zone called the thermocline. Inside a packed-bed storage unit, a hot region and a cold region coexist, separated by this relatively thin boundary layer where the temperature gradient is steepest. As the storage system charges and discharges, the thermocline migrates through the bed of particles, and its position, shape and stability directly determine how efficiently the system operates and how much of the stored energy can actually be extracted for useful work. A diffuse or poorly controlled thermocline means that hot and cold zones blur into one another, degrading the quality of the heat that can be delivered. Tracking this moving front in real time is therefore the key to intelligent operation, but doing so by direct measurement would require an impractically dense array of sensors threaded through the storage material.</p>
<p>Stefan Jakubek from TU Wien explains the practical obstacle plainly: a complete measurement of the spatial temperature distribution would demand a large number of sensors inside the storage system, and particularly given the high temperatures and harsh conditions found in industrial plants, this is technically complex and expensive. Thermocouples buried deep within a bed of hot particles must survive thermal cycling, mechanical stress and potentially corrosive or dust-laden gas flows, and every additional probe adds cost, complexity and another potential point of failure. The alternative pursued by the Vienna team is fundamentally different in philosophy. Instead of saturating the tank with instrumentation, they place a handful of sensors at positions chosen for their informational value and let a mathematical observer do the rest, continuously computing what the interior must look like given the measurements and the known physics of the process.</p>
<p>The technical machinery behind this achievement draws on several research fields at once. The team combines the modelling of distributed physical systems, in which temperature varies continuously across space and time, with mathematical model reduction, a technique that compresses an otherwise computationally heavy model into a leaner form suitable for real-time use. Crucially, the reduction is performed in a way that preserves the properties of the original model that are essential to describing how the thermocline moves through the tank. The researchers also apply optimal sensor placement, asking systematically at which positions a temperature sensor yields the greatest amount of information about the overall state of the storage unit. Control-theoretic state observation then fuses the model with the sensor data, while online parameter identification allows the algorithm to adapt itself to the actual behaviour of the plant as it evolves during operation.</p>
<p>The result is an estimation method that does more than reconstruct temperatures. It simultaneously estimates the heat transfer coefficient between the gas flowing through the bed and the solid storage material, a parameter that describes how effectively thermal energy passes between the two phases. Martin Kozek, one of the researchers involved, notes that this parameter enables the team to describe how effectively heat is transferred between gas and solid, and he adds that it opens up another interesting avenue of research. The significance of this second output is easy to underestimate, but it may prove just as valuable as the temperature reconstruction itself. Heat transfer is not a fixed property of a storage plant; it changes over the lifetime of the facility in ways that reflect its physical condition.</p>
<p>Consider, for example, what happens inside an industrial storage unit that is charged with waste heat carried by dust-laden gas flows. Over months and years of operation, fine particles carried by the gas can deposit on the surfaces of the storage material, gradually coating the very interfaces across which heat must pass. The consequence is a slow degradation of the heat transfer coefficient, which in turn erodes the performance of the entire storage system. Because the new method estimates this coefficient continuously and online, deviations from its expected behaviour can serve as an early warning sign of fouling or other internal changes. In this way, the same algorithm that supports energy-efficient operation also doubles as a diagnostic instrument, providing information on the condition of the plant and enabling a shift towards condition-based maintenance, in which servicing is triggered by the actual state of the equipment rather than by rigid schedules or by failures that have already occurred.</p>
<p>The project also illustrates the value of disciplinary collaboration within a single university. The Institute of Energy Technology and Thermodynamics at TU Wien contributes deep expertise in thermal energy systems and heat storage, while the Institute of Mechanics and Mechatronics complements it with methods from mathematical modelling, control engineering and process automation. The two institutes conduct their joint research as part of the Christian Doppler Laboratory for Digital Twins of Distributed Parameter Systems, a framework dedicated to learning, monitoring and optimising complex physical systems in real time. The phrase &#8216;digital twin&#8217; captures the underlying idea well: a continuously updated computational replica of a physical asset, fed by sparse measurements and refined by physics-based modelling, that mirrors the state of the real system closely enough to support decisions without invasive inspection. For packed-bed storage, that twin now runs on a handful of sensors and a reduced-order model.</p>
<p>The broader implications for the energy transition are considerable. Recovering industrial waste heat is widely regarded as one of the most attractive levers for raising energy efficiency and cutting greenhouse gas emissions, because the energy has already been generated and would otherwise be lost. Packed-bed thermal energy storage is particularly interesting in this context because it uses inexpensive solid storage materials and air as the heat transfer medium, making it suitable for the high-temperature regimes typical of heavy industry. What has been missing is a practical way to know, at any instant, how much usable energy the tank holds and where its thermal front sits. By solving that observability problem with minimal instrumentation, the TU Wien method lowers a genuine barrier to deploying these systems in demanding industrial environments, where dense sensor networks are neither affordable nor durable.</p>
<p>Looking ahead, the combination of thermocline tracking and continuous heat transfer estimation points towards storage plants that largely manage themselves. A control system equipped with such an observer can optimise charging and discharging strategies in real time, maximise the fraction of stored energy that is actually recoverable, and flag maintenance needs long before performance visibly declines. The research, validated through computational simulation and modelling on a fluidised-bed test rig at the university, demonstrates that sophisticated estimation techniques once confined to aerospace and process control can be brought to bear on the unglamorous but essential task of storing industrial heat. In a warming world that must squeeze every useful joule out of the energy it already produces, learning to see inside a hot steel tank without opening it may turn out to be one of the quietly consequential advances of the decade.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Observer-based state estimation for packed-bed thermal energy storage systems</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> A glimpse inside – without actually looking inside</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> A glimpse inside – without actually looking inside. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1146091" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> thermal energy storage, packed-bed storage, waste heat recovery, thermocline, state estimation, sensor placement, model reduction, heat transfer coefficient, digital twin, industrial energy efficiency, TU Wien, condition-based maintenance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">237564</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
