<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cochylimorpha bucegiana &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/cochylimorpha-bucegiana/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 06:15:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>European moth review identifies four species and describes a Romanian taxon</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/european-moth-review-identifies-four-species-and-describes-a-romanian-taxon/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 06:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carpathian moth diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cochylimorpha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cochylimorpha bucegiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cochylimorpha perfusana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cochylimorpha perfusana species group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA barcode analysis European moths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA barcoding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European moth species revision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genital morphology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geographic distribution of Cochylimorpha species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morphological and genitalia examination moth taxonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moth species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new species description Romania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclassification of Cochylimorpha dorsimaculana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revision of European moth records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Carpathians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[species delimitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxonomic history of European moths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxonomic review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxonomy of European moths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tortricidae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voucher specimen verification]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=324473</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A European taxonomic review separated the Cochylimorpha perfusana moth group into four species, reinstated two previously synonymized taxa and described the Romanian species Cochylimorpha bucegiana.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A taxonomic review of the European <em>Cochylimorpha perfusana</em> species group concluded that the group contains four species rather than one. The study reinstated <em>Cochylimorpha dorsimaculana</em> and <em>Cochylimorpha callosana</em> to species rank and described <em>Cochylimorpha bucegiana</em>, a new species from Romania’s Southern Carpathians.</p>
<p>The authors combined examination of 157 specimens with external morphology, male and female genitalia, type material, DNA barcodes and a reassessment of geographic records. The specimens came from the Austrian, Slovenian, Italian and French Alps; the Romanian Carpathians; Bulgaria’s Pirin Mountains; and the Velebit Mountains and neighboring low-mountain habitats in Croatia, Slovenia and Italy. The review was limited to European material, and some published geographic records could not be verified because the associated voucher specimens were unavailable or required re-examination.</p>
<p>The taxonomic problem arose after three European taxa described between 1845 and 1908 were combined under <em>C. perfusana</em> in a 1970 revision. The authors traced part of this history to an incorrect cross-reference in Herrich-Schäffer’s index, which directed both <em>C. perfusana</em> and <em>C. callosana</em> to the page containing only the former description. Later treatments consequently cited an incorrect year and publication for <em>C. callosana</em> and gave the wrong type locality. The three named taxa remained synonymized for more than 50 years.</p>
<p>Evidence of distinct Romanian populations had been reported more than 20 years earlier, when two populations assigned to <em>C. perfusana</em> were treated as typical and “callosana” forms. When female genitalia became available for study, material from the Eastern Carpathians resembled Austrian specimens and the figures published by Razowski, whereas material from the Southern Carpathians differed from the genitalia illustrated in his works. Subsequent examination of collections, type specimens and molecular data supported the presence of four related taxa.</p>
<p>DNA from 19 specimens was processed at the Canadian Centre for DNA Barcoding. Seven complete 658-base-pair cytochrome c oxidase I sequences and four shorter sequences were obtained, while eight samples failed to yield barcodes. The neighbour-joining tree was based on sequences longer than 600 base pairs and used the Kimura 2-parameter model, with two <em>Cochylimorpha jucundana</em> sequences as the outgroup. Two of the four shorter sequences were excluded from that tree because they were only 145 base pairs long.</p>
<p>External morphology and genitalia distinguished all four species. <em>C. perfusana</em> has a fine olive-green reticulate forewing pattern without brown scales and a straight phallus. <em>C. dorsimaculana</em> has a less contrasting brownish-yellow pattern, a prominent dorsal blotch and an S-shaped phallus. <em>C. callosana</em> has an extensive straw-yellow pattern with scattered brown scales. The newly described <em>C. bucegiana</em> has a yellowish-brown pattern forming a basal blotch, median transverse fascia, subapical blotch, subterminal blotch and narrow terminal fascia. Differences in the female genitalia, including the form and position of the signum and associated thorns, also separated the taxa.</p>
<p>The DNA results broadly supported the morphological divisions, although the barcode patterns were not identical to the species boundaries. <em>C. perfusana</em> and <em>C. dorsimaculana</em> shared one Barcode Index Number but formed separate sister groups with a minimum barcode distance of 1.07%. <em>C. callosana</em> had a minimum distance of 3.12% from <em>C. dorsimaculana</em> and 3.13% from <em>C. perfusana</em>. The new species occupied a separate BIN, BOLD:AEH6249, with minimum distances of 3.62% from <em>C. dorsimaculana</em>, 3.73% from <em>C. perfusana</em> and 4.43% from <em>C. callosana</em>. The authors considered the conspicuous morphological and habitat differences between the two species sharing a BIN sufficient to maintain them as separate species.</p>
<p>The revised distributions and habitats also separated the taxa. <em>C. dorsimaculana</em> is known only from Wachau and Retz in Lower Austria, where it occupies dry to semi-open meadows at approximately 200–300 metres. Larvae were reared from the flower heads of <em>Centaurea triumfettii</em>, and adults emerged between 8 and 10 May. <em>C. perfusana</em> inhabits mountain and high-mountain meadows at roughly 550–2100 metres across parts of the Alps, Carpathians and Pirin Mountains. <em>C. callosana</em> occurs mainly in Croatia, Slovenia and north-eastern Italy, with localized records in eastern France, Corsica and Hungary, generally in drier open slopes and meadows between 350 and 1500 metres.</p>
<p><em>C. bucegiana</em> was described from the Bucegi and Făgăraș Mountains of Romania’s Southern Carpathians, with its type locality in Jepii Valley in the Bucegi Mountains. It is known from high-mountain to subalpine meadows at 1500–2200 metres. The examined material includes Bucegi specimens collected from 1986 onward and one specimen collected in the Făgăraș Mountains in 1994. The species is known only from Romania and may be a Southern Carpathian endemic, although its presumed host plant, <em>Centaurea kotschyana</em>, occurs more widely in the Carpathians and Balkan Peninsula. Biology remains incompletely known for several members of the group, but the available observations indicate one generation annually, daytime adult activity and an association with <em>Centaurea</em> host plants.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Taxonomic review of four European species in the Cochylimorpha perfusana moth group</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> ﻿A review of the Cochylimorpha perfusana (Guenée, 1845) species group ( Lepidoptera , Tortricidae ) in Europe, with the description of a new species from the Southern Carpathians (Romania)</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Kovács, Z., Kovács, S., Buchner, P., &amp; Junnilainen, J. (2024). A review of the Cochylimorpha perfusana (Guenée, 1845) species group (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) in Europe, with the description of a new species from the Southern Carpathians (Romania). <em>Nota Lepidopterologica, 47</em>, 125-162. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3897/nl.47.122906" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.3897/nl.47.122906</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.3897/nl.47.122906" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.3897/nl.47.122906</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Cochylimorpha perfusana, taxonomic review, moth species, Cochylimorpha bucegiana, Southern Carpathians, DNA barcoding, species delimitation, genital morphology, Romania, Tortricidae, review, Cochylimorpha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">324473</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
