Every beach on Earth carries a faint trace of the planet’s geological origins. Primordial radionuclides, including uranium-238, radium-226, thorium-232 and potassium-40, have existed since the formation of the Earth and are incorporated into the minerals that make up sand, rock and soil. In most coastal environments, these isotopes occur at modest concentrations that pose little concern. But where heavy minerals accumulate, sands can become strikingly radioactive. The Visakhapatnam coast, with its complex geology and active sediment transport, proved to be exactly such a place, and measuring it required laboratory instrumentation of the highest sensitivity.

The research team collected beach sand samples from locations along the coastline and analysed them using a high-purity germanium gamma spectrometry system, a technique prized for its ability to resolve the characteristic gamma-ray signatures emitted by individual radionuclides. High-purity germanium detectors, cooled to reduce thermal noise, can distinguish the faint energy lines of uranium, radium, thorium and potassium decay chains from the background of ambient radiation, allowing precise quantification of each isotope’s activity concentration in units of becquerels per kilogram. The researchers also measured ambient radiation levels directly on the beaches to connect their laboratory findings to real-world exposure conditions.

The results were remarkable. Activity concentrations of uranium-238 ranged from 8.9 to 868 becquerels per kilogram, with a mean of 167. Radium-226 spanned from 2.8 to 1,282.8, averaging 292. The most dramatic findings concerned thorium-232, which ranged from 6.9 to a staggering 13,691.7 becquerels per kilogram, with a mean of 2,614, while potassium-40 ranged from 77.2 to 1,191.1 with a mean of 449. Each of these mean values exceeds the global averages reported for ordinary soils and sediments, and the thorium figures in particular place the most enriched samples firmly in the territory of monazite-bearing sands, the mineral that has made parts of the Indian coastline famous among radiation scientists for decades.

Thorium’s dominance in these sands is no accident. Monazite, a phosphate mineral rich in thorium and rare earth elements, is a hallmark of India’s eastern and southwestern coastal placer deposits. When waves and longshore currents sort sediments by density and grain size, heavy resistant minerals such as monazite, zircon and ilmenite become concentrated into placer deposits, while lighter quartz is winnowed away. Because thorium and its decay products are locked into monazite’s crystal lattice, these deposits act as natural concentrators of radioactivity. The measured absorbed gamma dose rates on the Visakhapatnam beaches, the study found, are comparable to those in monazite-rich high background radiation areas in India and worldwide, confirming that the same mineralogical processes are at work here.

One of the study’s most valuable contributions is its mapping of spatial variability. Rather than presenting a single average figure, the researchers generated spatial distribution maps that visualize the heterogeneity of radionuclide concentrations along the entire study area. These maps revealed a clear pattern: radioactivity levels rise consistently toward the northern sector of the coastline. This gradient likely reflects the interplay of sediment sources, wave-driven transport directions and the geomorphology of the coast, which ranges from sandy beaches to rocky headlands between Visakhapatnam and Bhimunipatnam. The authors also observed that radioactivity varied across the width of individual beaches, meaning that a visitor standing at the waterline may be on sand with a different radiological character than sand collected near the dunes or backshore.

To translate raw activity concentrations into statements about human risk, the team computed a battery of internationally recognized radiological hazard indices. These included radium equivalent activity, which combines the contributions of the uranium and thorium series and potassium into a single comparable quantity; the absorbed gamma dose rate, which estimates the energy deposited in air per unit time; the annual effective dose equivalent, which converts that dose into a projection of yearly health-relevant exposure; the gamma level index; and the external and internal hazard indices used in building-material and land-use assessments. Together, these indices allow the Visakhapatnam data to be compared directly with safety benchmarks established by bodies such as the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation and the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

The researchers went beyond measurement and mapping by applying statistical analyses to the relationships among the radionuclides themselves. Correlation analysis indicated a strong relationship between the radium series and the thorium series, a signature that the authors interpret as evidence of a common geological origin for the two decay chains. This makes geochemical sense: both uranium and thorium series isotopes tend to reside in the same heavy mineral phases, so their concentrations rise and fall together as those minerals are concentrated or diluted in the sand. Such correlations transform a set of isolated numbers into a coherent narrative about where the sand comes from and how the coast has sorted it over time.

It is important to keep the findings in perspective. Natural radioactivity in beach sand is not the same as contamination from human activity; these radionuclides are part of the Earth’s crust and have always been present. Millions of people worldwide live safely in high background radiation areas, including the well-studied monazite sands of Chhatrapur in Odisha and regions of Brazil, China and Kerala. What the Visakhapatnam study provides is a rigorous, spatially resolved baseline against which any future changes, whether from coastal engineering, sediment redistribution, or industrial development, can be judged. Baseline data of this quality are the foundation of long-term environmental monitoring and credible radiological risk assessment in coastal ecosystems.

The study also carries a broader message about how science sees ordinary landscapes. A beach that appears uniform to the eye is, to a gamma spectrometer, a patchwork of geological history written in decaying atoms. By combining sensitive nuclear instrumentation, spatial mapping and statistical interpretation, the researchers have shown that radioactivity along a single coastline can vary by three orders of magnitude within short distances. For coastal managers, public health authorities and the millions who visit these shores, the work of Ramesh and his colleagues offers both a caution about localized hotspots and a model of how careful, transparent measurement can turn invisible hazards into mapped, understood and monitorable features of the environment.

Subject of Research: Natural radionuclide distribution and radiological hazard assessment in beach sands of the Visakhapatnam coast, India

Article Title: Spatial distribution of natural radionuclides and radiological hazard assessment in beach sands of the Visakhapatnam coast, Eastern India

Article References: Ramesh, B., Savitri, P. P., Sudhakar, J., Kumar, R. B., Sahoo, S. K., Saradhi, I. V., & Pulhani, V. (2026). Spatial distribution of natural radionuclides and radiological hazard assessment in beach sands of the Visakhapatnam coast, Eastern India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 198(10), Article 1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-026-15926-6

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1007/s10661-026-15926-6

Keywords: natural radioactivity, gamma spectrometry, beach sand, thorium-232, radium-226, monazite, Visakhapatnam, radiological hazard, spatial distribution, coastal environment, high background radiation, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment