<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Clostridium &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/clostridium/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 14:27:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Gut Microbes and Tryptophan Metabolism Linked to Aggression in Stressed Chickens</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/gut-microbes-and-tryptophan-metabolism-linked-to-aggression-in-stressed-chickens/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daisy Hatcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 14:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggressive behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animal welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broiler chickens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chronic stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clostridium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corticosterone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gut microbiota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metabolomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbiota-gut-brain axis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poultry Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serotonin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stress-induced physiological and behavioral changes in poultry.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tryptophan metabolism]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=228243</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A multi-omics study shows that chronic corticosterone stress in broiler chickens reshapes gut bacteria and plasma metabolites, reducing hypothalamic serotonin and driving aggressive behavior through tryptophan metabolism.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chronic stress does more than stunt the growth of farmed chickens—it appears to rewire their gut bacteria and blood chemistry in ways that make them measurably more aggressive. That is the central finding of a new multi-omics study published in the journal Stress Biology, in which researchers at Nanjing Agricultural University traced a molecular chain of evidence connecting stress hormones, cecal microbes, circulating metabolites, and hostile behavior in broiler chickens. By combining 16S rRNA gene sequencing of gut bacteria with untargeted plasma metabolomics and behavioral testing, the team has assembled one of the most detailed pictures yet of how the microbiota-gut-brain axis may drive aggression in poultry.</p>
<p>The experiment began with fifty one-day-old yellow-feather broilers, housed in standard cages under a controlled 16-hour light and 8-hour dark cycle and fed a commercial diet. At 28 days of age, the birds were sorted into body-weight-matched pairs and randomly assigned to two groups. One group received daily subcutaneous injections of corticosterone—the principal stress hormone in birds—at a dose of 4 milligrams per kilogram of body weight for seven consecutive days. The control group received injections of a 15% ethanol solution at the same volume. This corticosterone regimen is a well-established way to simulate chronic stress in poultry, allowing researchers to isolate the hormonal component of stress without confounding factors such as heat, crowding, or transport.</p>
<p>The physiological consequences were swift and clear. After 35 days, corticosterone-treated broilers had significantly lower final body weights and reduced average daily gain compared with controls. Paradoxically, they ate more: average daily feed intake rose significantly, and the feed-to-weight ratio worsened, meaning the stressed birds converted feed into body mass far less efficiently. The authors suggest this pattern reflects a metabolic shift under chronic stress, with energy diverted toward fat deposition through increased proteolysis and gluconeogenesis—essentially, the birds were burning muscle to fuel a stress response while consuming more feed overall.</p>
<p>Behavioral testing, conducted on days 35 and 36 using video-recorded encounters between unfamiliar birds from the same treatment group, revealed a striking escalation in aggression. Corticosterone-exposed chickens pecked their opponents significantly more often, and the total number of aggressive acts rose sharply. The effect spanned the social hierarchy: both dominant birds—identified by how frequently their opponents avoided them—and subdominant birds showed elevated aggression, though dominant individuals displayed the strongest increases, including more twisting attacks. This aligns with earlier observations that dominant animals may have aggression reinforced through mesolimbic reward circuitry, and with prior reports that prenatal corticosterone exposure and social stress both heighten injurious pecking in hens.</p>
<p>Crucially, the team also measured serotonin, the neurotransmitter long associated with behavioral inhibition. Chronic corticosterone significantly reduced serotonin concentrations in the hypothalamus—a key brain region for stress regulation—while paradoxically increasing serotonin levels in the plasma. Dopamine levels in the plasma, hippocampus, and hypothalamus remained unchanged. Because more than 90% of the body&#8217;s serotonin is produced by enterochromaffin cells in the gut, and because peripheral serotonin cannot cross the blood-brain barrier, this split pattern points to a gut-centered mechanism: stress may boost peripheral serotonin synthesis while starving the brain of the tryptophan precursor it needs to maintain central serotonergic tone. Low central serotonin activity is consistently associated with heightened aggression and impulsivity across species, from fish and rodents to humans.</p>
<p>Sequencing of the cecal microbiota added a microbial dimension to the story. Overall diversity metrics told a subtle tale: seven alpha-diversity indices showed no significant differences between stressed and control birds, and principal coordinate analysis based on Bray-Curtis distances found their community structures broadly similar. Firmicutes and Actinobacteria dominated both groups, with Faecalibacterium, Bifidobacterium, and Lactobacillus as the most abundant genera. But linear discriminant analysis effect size screening identified 29 differentially abundant taxa. Stressed birds carried more Shigella, Holdemania, and Clostridium, and fewer Desulfovibrio, Cellulosimicrobium, Enterococcus, Coriobacteriaceae, and Bacteroidales.S24_7. The message is that chronic stress reshapes the gut ecosystem in targeted ways rather than broadly collapsing it.</p>
<p>The metabolomics analysis, performed on plasma using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to an Orbitrap mass spectrometer, identified 281 metabolites, of which 53 differed significantly between groups—23 upregulated and 30 downregulated under stress. Pathway enrichment pointed to tryptophan metabolism, pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis, and beta-alanine metabolism as the most affected networks. Tryptophan and its derivatives were upregulated in the plasma of stressed birds, even as hypothalamic serotonin fell. The researchers propose that immune activation under chronic stress may divert tryptophan away from serotonin production and into the kynurenine pathway, whose rate-limiting enzymes, IDO and TDO, are highly responsive to inflammatory cytokines. Kynurenine pathway metabolites such as quinolinic acid are themselves neuroactive and have been implicated in behavioral disorders.</p>
<p>Spearman correlation analyses then wove the threads together. Aggressive behavior correlated positively with the genus Clostridium and negatively with Actinomycetales and Coriobacteriaceae—relationships the authors note had not been described before. Clostridium, in turn, correlated positively with indole, L-tryptophan, and butyryl-L-carnitine, while Actinomycetales and Coriobacteriaceae tracked with beneficial compounds such as niacinamide and salicylic acid. Of 31 metabolites linked to the three key microbial taxa, 18 were also associated with aggression, including indole, L-tryptophan, biochanin A, niacinamide, leucodopachrome, and pyroglutamic acid. The mechanism may run through the vagus nerve: Clostridium species are known to metabolize tryptophan into neuroactive indoles and tryptamines that stimulate vagal afferents, and microbial metabolites such as kynurenine and indole derivatives are ligands for the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, a regulator of intestinal immune tone that can further bias tryptophan toward the kynurenine route.</p>
<p>The findings carry immediate practical weight for an industry where aggression translates directly into economic loss—non-beak-trimmed hens, for instance, show roughly a tenfold increase in mortality from aggressive pecking. The authors outline nutrition-based interventions supported by prior work: ensuring adequate dietary tryptophan, with commercial target tryptophan-to-lysine ratios around 16 to 19 percent, can support serotonergic tone and reduce abnormal pecking; probiotics such as Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Bacillus subtilis have been shown to mitigate stress-linked injurious behavior; and sodium butyrate, a microbial postbiotic, counters corticosterone-induced oxidative stress. The team is careful to stress that correlation is not causation, and that the observed taxa-metabolite-behavior links should be validated under different housing systems, stocking densities, lighting programs, and diets. Future experiments using fecal microbiota transplantation from donors with divergent stress phenotypes, gnotobiotic colonization, and targeted tryptophan manipulation could establish whether these gut communities truly transfer aggressive tendencies—a question made more plausible by mammalian studies in which microbiota transfer has conveyed anxiety- and depression-like behaviors between animals.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Gut microbiota and plasma metabolite mechanisms underlying stress-induced aggressive behavior in broiler chickens</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Integrative analysis of gut microbiota and plasma metabolites reveals mechanisms underlying aggressive behavior in chronically stressed broiler chickens</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Wu, X., Zhang, J., Ren, H., Cheng, X., Gao, J., &amp; Ma, W. (2026). Integrative analysis of gut microbiota and plasma metabolites reveals mechanisms underlying aggressive behavior in chronically stressed broiler chickens. <em>Stress Biology, 6</em>(1), Article 30. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-026-00297-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-026-00297-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-026-00297-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44154-026-00297-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> gut microbiota, broiler chickens, chronic stress, aggressive behavior, tryptophan metabolism, serotonin, corticosterone, metabolomics, microbiota-gut-brain axis, Clostridium, animal welfare, poultry science</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">228243</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gut Bacteria Turn Sugarcane Waste into Fuel Gold in Biorefinery Breakthrough</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/gut-bacteria-turn-sugarcane-waste-into-fuel-gold-in-biorefinery-breakthrough/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan Morrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1,3-propanediol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anaerobic bacteria biorefinery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioconversion of vinasse and glycerol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiesel crude glycerol conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethanol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofuel waste management and recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofuel waste valorization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofuel waste-to-value processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biohydrogen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biorefinery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[butyric acid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clostridium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clostridium bacteria for industrial chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crude glycerol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metabolic engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial production of bio-based chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial transformation of biofuel byproducts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[n-butanol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second-generation biofuel feedstock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugarcane bagasse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugarcane vinasse utilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable biofuel industry innovations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vinasse]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=212370</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new review maps how Clostridium bacteria can convert sugarcane ethanol and biodiesel waste streams into hydrogen, butanol, butyric acid, and 1,3-propanediol.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The world&#8217;s two largest biofuel industries—bioethanol and biodiesel—generate staggering mountains of waste every year. Sugarcane mills in Brazil alone produce billions of liters of vinasse, an acidic, nutrient-rich liquid residue, while biodiesel plants worldwide accumulate crude glycerol as an unwanted byproduct of transesterification. A new review published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts argues that these waste streams should not be seen as disposal problems at all, but as feedstock for an entirely second generation of industrial chemistry—one powered by a remarkable group of anaerobic bacteria from the genus Clostridium. The review, led by Rafael de Moraes Altafini and Valeria Reginatto of the University of São Paulo together with Mónica Coca of the University of Valladolid, systematically maps how these microbes can transform the leftovers of sugarcane ethanol and biodiesel production into hydrogen, butanol, butyric acid, and 1,3-propanediol, four compounds with substantial commercial value.</p>
<p>What makes Clostridium species so compelling as biocatalysts is the extraordinary breadth of carbon sources they can assimilate. The review emphasizes that these bacteria span the full range from C1 compounds such as carbon dioxide up to C6 sugars like glucose, a metabolic versatility few other industrial microbes can match. In the bioethanol sector, the relevant substrates are the C5 and C6 sugars liberated from sugarcane bagasse and straw—lignocellulosic materials left over after the sucrose has been pressed out—as well as vinasse itself. In the biodiesel sector, the star substrate is crude glycerol, the ten-percent fraction of every batch of biodiesel that plants often struggle to sell. Clostridium strains can ferment all of these, redirecting carbon that would otherwise be burned, landfilled, or discharged into waterways.</p>
<p>The metabolic machinery behind this flexibility is elegantly described in the review. Clostridium fermentation proceeds through two characteristic phases. During the acidogenic phase, cells grow rapidly and channel pyruvate—derived from glycolysis—into acids, chiefly acetic and butyric acid, via the enzyme pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase, which also generates reduced ferredoxin that can be used to evolve hydrogen gas. As the culture acidifies and enters the solventogenic phase, the cells switch metabolic gears, re-assimilating acids and reducing them into solvents, most notably n-butanol, the flagship product of the classic acetone–butanol–ethanol fermentation. A further layer of sophistication comes from the NADH-ferredoxin oxidoreductase system, which links the cell&#8217;s NADH pool to ferredoxin and thereby determines how much reducing power flows toward hydrogen versus reduced end products such as ethanol, lactate, and butyrate.</p>
<p>For the biodiesel side of the biorefinery, the review focuses on three species in particular: Clostridium butyricum, Clostridium pasteurianum, and Clostridium beijerinckii. Crude glycerol fermentation splits along two branches. In the oxidative branch, glycerol is converted through glycolysis into pyruvate and then into the usual acidogenic and solventogenic products, including hydrogen and butanol. In the reductive branch, glycerol is dehydrated to 3-hydroxypropionaldehyde and then reduced to 1,3-propanediol, a molecule with real industrial cachet because it serves as a monomer for polytrimethylene terephthalate, a high-value polyester used in carpets and textiles. The balance between these branches depends on the species, the strain, and the operating conditions, which is precisely why the comparative analysis in this review matters for anyone designing a process.</p>
<p>The comparative data deliver some clear winners. When it comes to producing 1,3-propanediol from biodiesel-derived crude glycerol, C. butyricum emerges as the most efficient producer among the species examined. The review reports productivities reaching 44.16 millimoles per liter per hour when the crude glycerol was pretreated with activated carbon—a striking demonstration that impurity removal can pay dividends—while untreated crude glycerol still supported respectable productivities of 20.4 to 36.8 millimoles per liter per hour. Those numbers matter because crude glycerol is contaminated with methanol, fatty acid soaps, and catalyst residues, all of which can inhibit fermentation. The finding suggests that a modest purification step, rather than full refining, may be the sweet spot for industrial economics.</p>
<p>Hydrogen production tells a more sobering story. The theoretical maximum yield from glucose is four moles of hydrogen per mole of glucose, but yields from lignocellulosic hydrolysates—the sugars obtained from sugarcane bagasse and straw—remain well below that ceiling. The review identifies three culprits. First, the partial pressure of hydrogen in the reactor headspace thermodynamically constrains further hydrogen evolution, which is why reactor design and gas sparging strategies feature prominently in the literature. Second, the competing reduction of NADH toward ethanol, lactate, and butyrate diverts electrons away from proton reduction. Third, and perhaps most insidiously, the harsh pretreatments needed to deconstruct lignocellulose release inhibitors such as 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and other furan and phenolic compounds that poison fermentative metabolism. Strategies to mitigate these effects, including the use of zero-valent iron to lower hydrogen partial pressure and adaptive laboratory evolution to build tolerance, are discussed as part of the optimization toolkit.</p>
<p>One of the most intriguing themes in the review is mixotrophy—the ability of certain Clostridium species to assimilate organic and inorganic carbon simultaneously. Through the Wood–Ljungdahl pathway, these organisms can fix carbon dioxide while fermenting sugars, effectively squeezing additional carbon out of every molecule of substrate and even improving product yields by rebalancing the cell&#8217;s redox state. The authors highlight this capability as a distinctive and underexplored asset for biorefinery integration, since bioethanol and biodiesel plants emit carbon dioxide streams that could, in principle, be fed directly into fermentation alongside vinasse or hydrolysate. In a future integrated facility, the same microbial platform could consume C5 and C6 sugars, organic acids in vinasse, glycerol, and CO2 all at once.</p>
<p>The review also surveys the process engineering landscape, comparing reactor configurations and operational modes across the literature. Continuous stirred tank reactors, anaerobic fluidized bed reactors, and upflow anaerobic sludge blanket systems each offer different trade-offs between biomass retention, mass transfer, and hydrogen partial pressure control, and the optimal choice depends on whether the target product is a gas, a solvent, or a diol. Immobilized-cell configurations and hydraulic retention time optimization appear repeatedly as levers for pushing productivities upward. What unites these engineering questions with the metabolic ones is that Clostridium processes are highly sensitive to operating conditions in ways that traditional ethanol fermentation is not, making careful bioreactor design a prerequisite rather than an afterthought.</p>
<p>The authors are refreshingly candid about the gap between laboratory promise and industrial reality. Every productivity figure in the review comes from laboratory-scale experiments, and no technoeconomic assessment of an integrated Clostridium-based biorefinery has yet been performed. Closing the material loops of the bioethanol and biodiesel chains—turning vinasse, bagasse hydrolysate, and crude glycerol into hydrogen, n-butanol, butyric acid, and 1,3-propanediol—will require advances in metabolic engineering, bioreactor design, and process optimization before any industrial-scale deployment can be justified. The review frames these as prerequisites, not optional refinements, and calls explicitly for rigorous technoeconomic analysis and life cycle assessment of the integrated configurations.</p>
<p>Even with those caveats, the vision is hard to dismiss. The products with the greatest market potential—hydrogen as a clean fuel and chemical feedstock, n-butanol as a drop-in fuel component and solvent, butyric acid for animal feed and plastics, and 1,3-propanediol for biopolymers—can all be obtained from residues that the biofuel industries already generate in enormous volumes. As the world&#8217;s ethanol and biodiesel capacity continues to grow, the economics of waste valorization improve with every new plant. Clostridium bacteria, once famous for their historical role in the first industrial acetone–butanol fermentation a century ago, may be poised for a second act: as the microbial workhorses that convert the biofuel economy&#8217;s leftovers into its next revenue stream. The review, funded by FAPESP, CAPES, and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, provides the roadmap—now the engineering has to catch up.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Clostridium-based biorefineries for valorizing sugarcane bioethanol and biodiesel byproducts</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Clostridium-based biorefineries in sugarcane bioethanol and biodiesel production: metabolic pathways, substrate diversity, and bioproduct yields</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> de Moraes Altafini, R., Bortolucci, J., Monico, D. A., Coca, M., &amp; Reginatto, V. (2026). Clostridium-based biorefineries in sugarcane bioethanol and biodiesel production: metabolic pathways, substrate diversity, and bioproduct yields. <em>Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-026-02818-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-026-02818-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-026-02818-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s13068-026-02818-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Clostridium, biorefinery, bioethanol, biodiesel, crude glycerol, vinasse, 1,3-propanediol, biohydrogen, n-butanol, butyric acid, sugarcane bagasse, metabolic engineering</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">212370</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
