The review was designed to support nurses who assess patients, provide health education, monitor symptoms and safety, and assist with post-discharge follow-up. The authors said the available evidence was fragmented and varied in quality, leaving clinical practice without unified, actionable guidance on activity intensity, safety thresholds, contraindications and sustained physical activity.

To compile the evidence, researchers searched international and Chinese guideline repositories, professional society websites and electronic databases. The search covered clinical decision resources, recommended practices, evidence summaries, expert consensus statements, systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials from database inception through November 2025.

Three researchers independently assessed methodological quality and carried out evidence extraction and synthesis. The final evidence base included five guidelines, 21 systematic reviews and four randomized controlled trials. These sources informed the 24 statements, which were organized into the six physical activity management domains.

The findings position nursing care as a coordinated process rather than a single exercise prescription. Pre-intervention assessment is linked with decisions about suitable activity types and intensity, while individualized planning addresses implementation in the patient’s clinical setting. Safety considerations and contraindications form a separate domain, alongside longer-term strategies intended to maintain activity and support behavior.

The review identifies the roles nurses may undertake across the continuum of care, including functional assessment, patient education, symptom and safety monitoring, and follow-up support after discharge. However, the supplied research summary does not reproduce the full text of each of the 24 statements. It therefore does not provide the wording, thresholds or activity doses that would permit one universal regimen to be inferred from the findings.

The authors concluded that physical activity guidance should be tailored to the clinical context, available resources and patient preferences. They present risk assessment and stratification as ways to support safe implementation and long-term maintenance. This conclusion is an approach for organizing nursing guidance, not evidence that any particular nursing-led intervention was tested by the review as a single new program.

The principal output is a synthesized evidence base for nursing practice rather than a new trial or a meta-analytic estimate of treatment effects. Although four randomized controlled trials were among the 30 included studies, the supplied abstract reports their presence in the evidence base without presenting their populations, interventions, outcomes or effect estimates. The article was published as open-access research in BMC Nursing in an early accepted version that may still undergo editorial changes.

Subject of Research: Evidence synthesis of nursing physical activity management in advanced lung cancer

Article Title: Evidence-based summary of nursing care for physical activity management in advanced lung cancer

Article References: Yang, X., Sun, X., Hu, G., Cheng, S., & Zhang, Z. (2026). Evidence-based summary of nursing care for physical activity management in advanced lung cancer. BMC Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-026-05220-8

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1186/s12912-026-05220-8

Keywords: advanced lung cancer, physical activity, nursing care, evidence synthesis, clinical guidelines, risk assessment, patient safety, behavioral support, functional monitoring, Evidence-based, summary, nursing