<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>chemotaxonomy &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/chemotaxonomy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 12:23:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Two Anatolian Mountain Teas Reveal Starkly Different Chemistry and Healing Potential</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/two-anatolian-mountain-teas-reveal-starkly-different-chemistry-and-healing-potential/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 12:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anatolia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antifungal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antioxidant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of mountain herbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta-pinene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical diversity in herbal teas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemotaxonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparative phytochemical study of Sideritis species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endemic plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endemic Turkish mountain herbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essential oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GC–MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healing potential of mountain teas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LC-MS/MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediterranean herbal teas and health benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mountain tea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural remedies for digestive and cold relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmacological properties of Sideritis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phenolic compounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientific research on traditional medicinal plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sideritis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sideritis mountain tea chemical analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traditional Anatolian herbal medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkish endemic plant species]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=235014</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A comparative study of two endemic Anatolian mountain teas reveals sharply different essential oil and phenolic profiles, with Sideritis argyrea showing stronger antioxidant and antifungal activity and both species offering chemical markers for authentication.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High in the mountains of Anatolia, a humble herb has been brewed into a beloved tea for generations. Now, scientists have taken a closer look at two endemic species of this mountain tea, known botanically as Sideritis, and discovered that the two plants are far more chemically distinct than their similar appearance and shared folk-medicinal reputation would suggest. A research team led by Nagehan Saltan of Anadolu University in Turkey, working with colleagues at Anadolu University and Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, published their comparative analysis in the journal Plant Biosystems, offering one of the most detailed chemical portraits to date of two rare Turkish endemics: Sideritis syriaca subsp. nusairiensis and Sideritis argyrea.</p>
<p>The genus Sideritis, a member of the mint family Lamiaceae, comprises dozens of species distributed across the Mediterranean basin, and Turkey is one of the richest centers of diversity for the group. Locally, the dried flowering aerial parts of these plants are steeped as a soothing infusion, often called mountain tea or dağ çayı, and traditionally used to ease digestive complaints, calm colds, and support general wellbeing. Earlier pharmacological work on the genus has documented anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antimicrobial, and antispasmodic properties, which has fueled growing scientific and commercial interest in these plants. Yet many Anatolian species remain poorly characterized, and distinguishing between closely related taxa can be surprisingly difficult, both for botanists and for the herbal trade that depends on correctly identified raw material.</p>
<p>That identification problem is precisely where the new study makes its most practical contribution. The researchers set out to determine whether specific secondary metabolites, particularly the phenylethanoid glycoside martynoside, could serve as discriminative chemotaxonomic markers, chemical fingerprints that reliably distinguish one species from another. Chemotaxonomy, the use of chemical profiles to classify and authenticate organisms, has become an increasingly valuable tool as global demand for herbal products rises and adulteration or mislabeling of medicinal plants becomes a genuine concern. For endemic species with limited geographic ranges, such as the two Anatolian Sideritis taxa examined here, robust chemical markers could help protect both consumer safety and biodiversity.</p>
<p>To build those fingerprints, the team deployed a two-pronged analytical strategy. First, they characterized the essential oil compositions of both plants using gas chromatography with flame ionization detection and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry, the gold-standard techniques for resolving and identifying volatile compounds. Second, they mapped the non-volatile phenolic constituents using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, or LC-MS/MS, which allows researchers to detect and tentatively identify polar compounds such as flavonoids and phenylpropanoid glycosides with high sensitivity. The biological potential of the extracts was then evaluated through a battery of standardized antioxidant and antimicrobial assays, allowing the researchers to correlate the chemical findings with measurable functional activity rather than relying on chemistry alone.</p>
<p>The essential oil results revealed two strikingly different volatile worlds. Sideritis syriaca subsp. nusairiensis produced a hydrocarbon-dominated profile, with its most abundant constituents being hexahydrofarnesyl acetone at 11.7 percent, hexadecanoic acid at 11.6 percent, and the long-chain alkane nonacosane at 10.9 percent. This composition translates into the waxy, fatty olfactory notes often associated with cuticle lipids and long-chain molecules. Sideritis argyrea, by contrast, displayed a terpene-rich profile dominated by monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes: beta-pinene at a remarkable 35.5 percent, alpha-pinene at 24.3 percent, and the sesquiterpenoid epi-cubebol at 13.0 percent. Anyone who has walked through a pine forest will recognize the significance of that pinene content, because these compounds are responsible for the fresh, resinous, pine-like aroma that characterizes many coniferous landscapes.</p>
<p>These chemical differences were not merely academic curiosities. The researchers noted that the volatile profiles correlated directly with the olfactory characteristics of the two plants, explaining why the two mountain teas would smell and taste noticeably different despite their close relationship. The waxy and fatty notes of Sideritis syriaca subsp. nusairiensis stand in sharp contrast to the crisp, fresh pine character of Sideritis argyrea. For the herbal tea industry, where aroma is a key driver of consumer preference and product identity, such distinctions carry real economic weight. They also provide a practical means of authentication: a supplier or regulator could, in principle, verify the botanical identity of a batch of dried mountain tea simply by analyzing its volatile profile.</p>
<p>The phenolic analysis added another layer of differentiation. LC-MS/MS identified a higher prevalence of methylated and acylated flavonoid and phenylpropanoid derivatives in Sideritis argyrea compared with its counterpart. Methylation and acylation are biochemical modifications that alter the solubility, stability, and biological behavior of plant phenolics, and their prevalence in one species but not the other reinforces the idea that these two taxa have followed genuinely divergent metabolic paths. Phenylethanoid glycosides such as verbascoside and martynoside, compounds well documented in the Lamiaceae family and studied for their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, form part of this phenolic repertoire and underpin the study&#8217;s chemotaxonomic argument.</p>
<p>When the team turned to biological testing, the functional differences between the two species became even more apparent. Sideritis argyrea exhibited more pronounced antioxidant activity, achieving an IC50 value of 0.18 milligrams per milliliter in the standardized assays, and it demonstrated a broader antifungal spectrum, with particularly notable activity against Candida species. The IC50 value, the concentration required to neutralize half of the free radicals in the test system, serves as a widely used benchmark of antioxidant potency, and lower values indicate stronger activity. Candida species are yeasts that include common human pathogens, and the rise of antifungal resistance has made the search for new antifungal compounds from natural sources an urgent priority in medical mycology.</p>
<p>The superior performance of Sideritis argyrea in both antioxidant and antifungal assays aligns neatly with its chemical profile. Terpene-rich essential oils, particularly those abundant in pinenes, are well known for antimicrobial properties, and the elevated levels of modified flavonoids and phenylpropanoids likely contribute additional radical-scavenging capacity. The authors conclude that Sideritis argyrea possesses genuine potential as a source of natural bioactive substances with medicinal interest. At the same time, they are careful to frame their findings within the scope of the investigated populations, a scientifically responsible caveat given that essential oil composition in plants can vary with geography, altitude, harvest time, and environmental conditions.</p>
<p>Beyond the laboratory findings, the study carries broader implications for conservation and commerce. Both taxa are endemic to Anatolia, meaning they grow nowhere else on Earth, and endemic plants with medicinal reputations are often vulnerable to overharvesting as demand grows. Reliable chemotaxonomic markers give researchers and regulators the tools to authenticate plant material, trace supply chains, and support sustainable cultivation initiatives, much as DNA barcoding has been proposed for related Sideritis species destined for industrial cultivation. For now, the message from the Turkish team is clear: the two mountain teas of Anatolia are not interchangeable. One smells of pine and fights microbes with terpene firepower, while the other carries a waxy, fatty signature and a different phenolic arsenal. As interest in functional foods and plant-based therapeutics continues to surge worldwide, studies like this one remind us that the fine chemical details separating closely related plants can determine everything from the flavor in the cup to the future of a species on a mountainside.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Comparative phytochemistry and biological activities of two endemic Anatolian Sideritis mountain tea species</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Comparative phytochemical analysis and biological activities of two Anatolian Mountain Teas: Sideritis syriaca subsp. nusairiensis and Sideritis argyrea</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Saltan, N., Iscan, G., Kose, Y. B., Goger, F., &amp; Demirci, B. (2026). Comparative phytochemical analysis and biological activities of two Anatolian Mountain Teas: Sideritis syriaca subsp. nusairiensis and Sideritis argyrea. <em>Plant Biosystems, 160</em>(4), Article 223. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44473-026-00231-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44473-026-00231-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44473-026-00231-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44473-026-00231-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Sideritis, mountain tea, chemotaxonomy, essential oil, GC-MS, LC-MS/MS, antioxidant, antifungal, phenolic compounds, beta-pinene, Anatolia, endemic plants</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">235014</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mass Spectrometry Map Reveals Hidden Chemical Diversity Across the Cabbage Family</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/mass-spectrometry-map-reveals-hidden-chemical-diversity-across-the-cabbage-family/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Townsend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 23:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brassicaceae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brassicaceae metabolomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camelina sativa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical novelty in crucifer species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemotaxonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparative plant biochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computational annotation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computational annotation in metabolomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hidden chemical diversity in cabbage family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-resolution Orbitrap mass spectrometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LC-MS/MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass spectrometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metabolomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phylogenetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant biochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant chemical diversity mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant defense chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specialized metabolites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specialized plant metabolites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standardized metabolite profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sulfur compounds in Brassicaceae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[triterpenoid saponins]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=215200</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A standardized mass-spectrometry survey of fourteen crucifer species reveals that triterpenoid saponins and other specialized metabolites are far more widespread across the Brassicaceae than previously believed.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plants cannot run from their enemies, so they fight with chemistry. The mustard family, Brassicaceae, is famous for the pungent sulfur compounds that give mustard, cabbage, and wasabi their bite, but those well-known defenses are only the visible tip of an enormous biochemical iceberg. A new study published in the journal Metabolomics has now mapped the specialized metabolites of fourteen crucifer species in a single, standardized framework, revealing hotspots of chemical novelty that had never been systematically compared before. Led by Felicia C. Wolters of Wageningen University &amp; Research, together with colleagues including Marnix Medema, Klaas Bouwmeester, and Justin van der Hooft, the work combines liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry with a battery of computational annotation tools to ask a deceptively simple question: which chemicals do all these related plants share, and which are unique?</p>
<p>The scale of the undertaking is what sets it apart. The team grew fourteen species under tightly controlled greenhouse conditions, harvested both leaf and root tissue at the same developmental stage and time of day, and extracted metabolites using a single, reproducible protocol. Each batch was then run on the same high-resolution Orbitrap mass spectrometer in both positive and negative ionization modes, capturing semi-polar to moderately polar compounds across a mass range of roughly 90 to 1350 daltons. From the raw spectra, the researchers extracted 7,683 mass features in positive mode and 6,433 in negative mode using the software mzmine. Mass features are the detectable ionic fingerprints of individual compounds in a complex mixture, and aligning them across species is the foundation of any comparative metabolomics study.</p>
<p>Extracting features, however, is only half the battle. The central challenge of untargeted metabolomics is that most detected features cannot be matched to known compounds in spectral libraries, and different computational tools often disagree. To overcome this, the team built a consensus annotation pipeline that integrates several state-of-the-art in silico tools: SIRIUS with CANOPUS for molecular formula and chemical class prediction, MS2Query for spectral analogue searching, and the deep-learning tool DreaMS queried against the MassSpecGym library. Only features whose compound class annotations agreed across multiple tools were retained, yielding 5,118 consistently annotated features in positive mode and 2,542 in negative mode. Chemical classes were assigned using the NP.Classifier ontology, a deep-learning-based classification system for natural products. This consensus approach does not deliver unambiguous structural proof, the authors caution, but it makes chemical ontology assignments considerably more reliable than any single tool alone.</p>
<p>With the annotated dataset in hand, the researchers could define what they call the core metabolome of the family. The Brassicaceae phylogeny was recently revised into two subfamilies and five supertribes, and the study focused on the two largest, Camelinodae and Brassicodae, with the early-diverging species Aethionema arabicum as an outgroup. The results showed that only a small fraction of the chemical space is truly conserved: just 2.9 percent of annotated features in positive mode and 1.5 percent in negative mode were shared across all fourteen species. In contrast, the two supertribes shared 13 percent of features in positive mode and 19.2 percent in negative mode, while species-specific features ranged from 7 to 45 percent of the total fingerprint. Conserved profiles broadly tracked phylogenetic distance, suggesting that chemistry, like genes, carries an evolutionary memory.</p>
<p>The most striking findings came from the chemical mavericks. Camelina sativa, the oilseed crop known as false flax, Capsella rubella, and Barbarea vulgaris, a bitter leafy herb, stood out with exceptionally unique metabolite profiles. In Camelina sativa, unique terpenoid features accounted for 33.5 percent of annotations in positive mode and a remarkable 55.6 percent in negative mode, the largest unique terpenoid profile recorded in the study. Terpenoids are one of the largest and most structurally diverse classes of plant natural products, and their abundance in Camelina hints at biosynthetic pathways that have gone largely unexplored in this crop. The finding could have practical consequences for breeding oilseed crops with enhanced pest resistance or novel nutritional chemistry.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most intriguing discovery concerns triterpenoid saponins, soap-like compounds with a characteristic oleanane-type carbon skeleton. Until now, these molecules were believed to be essentially exclusive to Barbarea vulgaris within the Brassicaceae, where they act as feeding deterrents against the diamondback moth. Using MS2LDA, a topic-modeling approach that extracts recurring fragmentation patterns called Mass2Motifs from tandem mass spectra, the team identified substructure motifs corresponding to oleanane and ursane triterpenoid cores and their conjugated glycosides. These motifs were detected not only in Barbarea but across leaf and root tissue of five Camelinodae species, in Brassica carinata, and even in the outgroup Aethionema arabicum. Characteristic fragment peaks at mass-to-charge ratios of 439.36, 119.09, and 105.07, matching library spectra of oleanolic acid, appeared in species where such saponins had never been reported before.</p>
<p>The authors are careful about interpretation. Some of the glycosylation-related fragmentation patterns required careful scrutiny because in-source fragmentation, in which molecules break apart inside the instrument before mass analysis, can masquerade as genuine sugar-loss signatures. Molecular families with highly similar retention times flagged this phenomenon in the Camelina data. Nevertheless, the convergence of multiple independent lines of evidence, including compound class predictions, spectral library matches, and substructure motifs, makes a compelling case that triterpenoid saponin-like chemistry is far more widespread in the crucifer family than decades of targeted phytochemistry had suggested. The result is a textbook example of how untargeted, computationally guided approaches can overturn long-held assumptions about the distribution of natural products.</p>
<p>The study also probed alkaloids, finding that tryptophan-derived alkaloid annotations were enriched across all species, while anthracillic acid alkaloids were particularly abundant in Isatis tinctoria, the historic dye plant woad, and ornithine alkaloids dominated in Aethionema arabicum. Molecular networking further suggested the presence of the phytoalexin camalexin, previously known mainly from Arabidopsis thaliana and Camelina, in the root tissue of Capsella rubella. Indole ring substructure motifs were widely distributed through the network, and the researchers propose systematically fingerprinting closely related species in the Arabidopsidae and Camelinae tribes to determine how specific camalexin production really is within the supertribe.</p>
<p>To test whether chemistry can reconstruct evolution, the team extended the analysis to seventeen species by integrating a second batch of LC-MS/MS data using the MS-Cluster algorithm, which computes consensus spectra while ignoring retention time shifts between batches. After filtering for high-confidence structural annotations from SIRIUS, 895 unique structures remained. Hierarchical clustering of these annotations, combining leaf and root profiles, largely reproduced the species phylogeny, with Brassicodae and Camelinodae species falling into distinct groups. Notable exceptions were informative: Lepidium sativum consistently grouped with Isatis tinctoria, hinting at phytochemical relatedness within the Lepidae tribe, while Camelina sativa persistently appeared as an outgroup in every clustering scenario, an enigma the authors suggest could be resolved by sampling more Camelinodae species. Tissue-specific clustering also revealed that leaf and root profiles can be conserved to different degrees, consistent with the idea that different organs face different selective pressures from herbivores, pathogens, and microbes.</p>
<p>Beyond its specific findings, the study offers a blueprint. The authors argue that current estimates of the total number of unique plant compounds are extrapolated from a biased sample of species and ignore phylogenetic distance, and they advocate clade-wide, standardized metabolic fingerprinting to correct this bias. Because specialized metabolites are often stress-induced, they note that a single snapshot under benign growth conditions inevitably underestimates the biochemical repertoire, and future designs should systematically elicit hormone-mediated stress responses. The modular pipeline, from growth chamber to consensus annotation, is extendable to other plant families, and all data have been deposited in public repositories including MetaboLights and MassIVE. For a family that supplies much of the world&#8217;s vegetables, oils, and model organisms, the message is clear: the chemical frontier of the Brassicaceae is far wider, and far stranger, than anyone had measured.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Comparative metabolomic fingerprinting of specialized metabolite diversity across Brassicaceae species</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Systematic mass-spectrometry-guided metabolic fingerprinting elucidates diversity of specialized metabolites across the Brassicaceae</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Wolters, F. C., Woldu, T., Schranz, M. E., Medema, M. H., Bouwmeester, K., &amp; van der Hooft, J. J. J. (2026). Systematic mass-spectrometry-guided metabolic fingerprinting elucidates diversity of specialized metabolites across the Brassicaceae. <em>Metabolomics, 22</em>(5), Article 161. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-026-02537-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-026-02537-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-026-02537-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11306-026-02537-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Brassicaceae, metabolomics, mass spectrometry, specialized metabolites, triterpenoid saponins, chemotaxonomy, LC-MS/MS, molecular networking, Camelina sativa, plant biochemistry, computational annotation, phylogenetics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">215200</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
