<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>cement composites &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/cement-composites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 22:13:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Flax-Fiber Foamed Mortars Turn Waste Rubber and Lightweight Aggregates into Sound-Absorbing Building Materials</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/flax-fiber-foamed-mortars-turn-waste-rubber-and-lightweight-aggregates-into-sound-absorbing-building-materials/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 22:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acoustic panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cement composites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison of foam mortars with different aggregates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expanded vermiculite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flax fiber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flax fiber reinforcement in construction materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foam insulation with lightweight aggregates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foamed mortar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of aggregate type and microstructure on mortar properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative use of waste rubber in construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lightweight aggregates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lightweight thermal and acoustic building materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multifunctional foam mortars for energy-efficient buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-load-bearing applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porosity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porous microstructure for acoustic performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rubber-flax hybrid foam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sound absorption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sound-absorbing building materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable cement-based mortars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal conductivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal insulation in non-load-bearing structures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste rubber]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=210753</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A controlled study of twenty mortar mixtures shows that flax-fiber-reinforced foamed mortars containing waste rubber or expanded vermiculite can deliver exceptional sound absorption and thermal insulation for non-load-bearing building applications.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A team of civil engineers has produced one of the most comprehensive head-to-head comparisons yet of sustainable cement-based mortars, testing twenty different mixtures that combine five aggregate types, two matrix systems, and flax fiber reinforcement under identical production and testing conditions. The study, published in Case Studies in Construction Materials, maps how density, porosity, strength, thermal conductivity, and sound absorption interact across a single experimental framework, and it identifies two standout formulations for non-load-bearing building applications: an ultra-light vermiculite foam for thermal insulation and a rubber-flax hybrid foam that absorbs more sound than anything else in the series.</p>
<p>The research was motivated by a persistent gap in the literature. Traditional dense mortars are mechanically stiff and thermally conductive but absorb almost no sound because of their compact microstructure, which drives up both energy demand and acoustic discomfort in buildings. Foamed mortars, whose densities can range from 400 to 1800 kilograms per cubic meter and whose thermal conductivities fall between 0.10 and 0.35 watts per meter-kelvin, offer a lighter and quieter alternative. Yet most previous studies examined a single aggregate within a single binder system, making it impossible to disentangle how aggregate shape, matrix architecture, and fiber inclusions jointly control multifunctional performance. The researchers, led by Elif Tuğçe Kocabeyoğlu and Fuat Köksal of Yozgat Bozok University together with Osman Gencel, set out to close that gap with a controlled benchmark of twenty mixtures.</p>
<p>The experimental design was deliberately systematic. Five fine aggregates in the 0–2 millimeter range were selected: crushed sand as the conventional reference, expanded clay, pumice, expanded vermiculite as lightweight mineral aggregates, and waste rubber granules as an eco-friendly damping additive. Each aggregate was combined with a normal mortar matrix and a foamed mortar matrix, and each of those ten combinations was produced with and without 15 kilograms per cubic meter of flax fiber. The flax fibers, used as received without surface treatment, had tensile strengths of 800 to 1500 megapascals, an elastic modulus of 50 to 70 gigapascals, and a density of just 1.54 grams per cubic centimeter. Foamed mixtures were produced by introducing preformed foam with a density of 80 grams per liter, generated from a plant-based foaming agent and compressed air. All specimens were water-cured for 28 days and then subjected to an extensive battery of tests covering physical, mechanical, thermal, acoustic, and microstructural behavior.</p>
<p>The physical results traced a clear hierarchy. Dry unit weights ranged from 2179 kilograms per cubic meter for the dense crushed-sand reference mortar down to just 562 kilograms per cubic meter for the flax-reinforced foamed vermiculite mixture, the lightest material in the entire series. Porosity followed the inverse pattern, climbing from 12.27 percent in the dense reference to 55.18 percent in the foamed vermiculite composite. Expanded vermiculite proved the most efficient single ingredient for reducing both density and thermal conductivity, a consequence of its lamellar, highly porous particle structure. Flax fiber addition consistently lowered unit weight and raised water absorption, capillary uptake, and porosity, because the fibers disrupted particle packing and introduced interconnected voids during mixing and drying.</p>
<p>Mechanical performance told a more sobering story. The crushed-sand reference mortar dominated every strength measure, achieving a compressive strength of 49.91 megapascals, a flexural strength of 10.6 megapascals, a splitting tensile strength of 5.32 megapascals, and an elastic modulus of 10.83 gigapascals. Foaming cut these values substantially; the foamed crushed-sand mixture reached only 21.17 megapascals in compression. Lightweight aggregates imposed further penalties, with vermiculite mixtures dropping to roughly 2.4 megapascals in compression. Intriguingly, the rubber mixtures recorded the lowest ultrasonic pulse velocities despite moderate porosity, because soft, hydrophobic rubber particles form weak interfacial transition zones that scatter and attenuate ultrasonic waves far more effectively than stiffer mineral pores. The study demonstrates that mechanical behavior cannot be predicted from porosity alone; the stiffness and interfacial compatibility of the aggregate skeleton matter just as much.</p>
<p>Thermal conductivity results delivered the study&#8217;s most dramatic numbers. The dense reference mortar conducted heat at 2.00 watts per meter-kelvin, but the foamed vermiculite composite with flax fiber achieved just 0.198 watts per meter-kelvin, a tenfold reduction and the lowest value of the entire series. This performance arises from three stacked mechanisms: the lamellar porosity of vermiculite particles, the air-void cellular structure of the foamed matrix, and the microstructural discontinuities introduced by fiber incorporation. Flax fiber alone reduced conductivity measurably even in dense mixes, dropping the crushed-sand mortar from 2.00 to 1.441 watts per meter-kelvin. Rubber aggregates also performed well thermally, at 0.371 watts per meter-kelvin in the best foamed variant, thanks to their low intrinsic conductivity and poor interfacial bonding with cement paste.</p>
<p>The acoustic findings overturned a common assumption. Noise reduction coefficients increased with specimen thickness across all mixtures, with 5-centimeter samples consistently absorbing the most sound, and foamed mortars outperforming their dense counterparts. But when the team moved from vermiculite to rubber mixtures, porosity dropped sharply while sound absorption rose. The flax-fiber-reinforced foamed rubber mixture, F-KAU-KL, achieved the highest noise reduction coefficient of the series at 0.5740 for 5-centimeter specimens, despite having lower porosity than the vermiculite foams. The researchers attribute this to the viscoelastic damping of rubber granules combined with the additional microstructural discontinuities created by flax fibers, which multiply internal friction and scattering pathways for sound energy. Porosity helps, but it is not the whole story.</p>
<p>Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction provided the microstructural evidence behind these macroscale trends. The dense reference mortar showed a compact, well-interlocked C–S–H gel network with minimal voids, explaining its strength and high conductivity. Fiber-reinforced samples revealed grooved flax fibers with partial debonding and interfacial gaps that created microchannels, reducing strength but opening pathways for thermal and acoustic insulation. The foamed rubber composite displayed large irregular voids between 50 and 390 micrometers, weak rubber-paste interfaces, and fragmented hydration products, a morphology that cripples load transfer but excels at dissipating sound and blocking heat. XRD confirmed the mineralogical signatures of each aggregate, from the quartz-rich expanded clay to the layered vermiculite and phlogopite of the GV particles and the amorphous rubber matrix with crystalline vulcanization residues.</p>
<p>The authors are careful about practical limits. The mechanically weak mixtures, particularly the foamed vermiculite and foamed rubber composites, are suitable only for protected non-load-bearing uses such as interior acoustic linings, insulation layers, lightweight infill, and sandwich-panel cores, and must never be used in load-bearing masonry, slabs, or impact-exposed elements. They also note that their comparisons are descriptive rather than statistically validated, since inferential analyses were not performed, and they recommend future work with confidence intervals, analysis of variance, dynamic mechanical analysis, and detailed pore evaluation. Within those constraints, the study delivers a rare integrated performance map: F-GV-KL is the material of choice when minimum density and maximum thermal insulation are the goals, while F-KAU-KL offers the best combination of low weight, high sound absorption, and moderate insulation for acoustic panels. By benchmarking five aggregates, two matrices, and a natural fiber in a single framework, the research gives designers of sustainable, acoustically enhanced buildings a quantitative basis for choosing the right mortar for the right job.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Hybrid flax fiber reinforced normal and foamed mortars with five aggregate types for sustainable, acoustically enhanced non-load-bearing applications</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Comparative evaluation of hybrid flax fiber reinforced normal and foamed mortar using five aggregates for sustainable and acoustically enhanced non-load-bearing applications</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Comparative evaluation of hybrid flax fiber reinforced normal and foamed mortar using five aggregates for sustainable and acoustically enhanced non-load-bearing applications. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214509526007795?dgcid=rss_sd_all" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> foamed mortar, flax fiber, expanded vermiculite, waste rubber, sound absorption, thermal conductivity, lightweight aggregates, porosity, sustainable construction, non-load-bearing applications, cement composites, acoustic panels</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">210753</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advancements in Rice Husk Ash Cement Composites</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/advancements-in-rice-husk-ash-cement-composites/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 04:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agricultural byproducts in construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cement composites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact of cement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative construction materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanical properties of concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanomaterials in construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pozzolanic activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice husk ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silica-rich materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable building materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste management in construction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/advancements-in-rice-husk-ash-cement-composites/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Rice husk ash (RHA) has emerged as a compelling alternative to traditional cement materials in recent years, garnering significant interest in both academic and industrial circles. As the global demand for sustainable building materials rises, researchers are turning to innovative sources like RHA that can minimize environmental impact while enhancing the mechanical properties of concrete. [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rice husk ash (RHA) has emerged as a compelling alternative to traditional cement materials in recent years, garnering significant interest in both academic and industrial circles. As the global demand for sustainable building materials rises, researchers are turning to innovative sources like RHA that can minimize environmental impact while enhancing the mechanical properties of concrete. RHA is a byproduct derived from the agricultural industry, particularly from rice processing, representing an abundant and inexpensive resource. The incorporation of RHA into cement composites not only addresses waste management issues but also enhances the overall performance of construction materials.</p>
<p>The benefits of using rice husk ash cannot be overstated. It is rich in silica, a crucial component that contributes to the pozzolanic activity required for effective cement hydration. The fine particles of RHA provide a high surface area that can react with calcium hydroxide, a byproduct of cement hydration, to form additional cementitious compounds. This reaction results in improved strength, durability, and resistance to aggressive environmental conditions. Traditional cement production, in contrast, is a significant source of carbon emissions; thus, blending materials like RHA can foster more sustainable construction practices.</p>
<p>Nanomaterials have also gained attention for their potential to revolutionize the field of construction. When blended with ordinary Portland cement, these materials can significantly modify the microstructure of geopolymer cement composites. The fascination with nanomaterials stem from their unique physical and chemical properties, which can enhance the mechanical strength and enhance the resilience of the final product. Researchers are currently exploring various nanomaterials such as nano-silica, carbon nanotubes, and titanium dioxide to determine their synergistic effects when combined with RHA in cement matrices.</p>
<p>The amalgamation of RHA and nanomaterials sets the stage for innovation in composite materials, enabling engineers to tailor blends that not only perform exceptionally well under compressive loads but can also withstand harsh environmental conditions. Such advancements might prove vital for regions prone to aggressive weather patterns or for structures requiring longevity in marine environments. The transportation and construction sectors, which account for vast energy consumption and resource usage, stand to benefit immensely if these materials can be effectively employed in real-world applications.</p>
<p>Moreover, the sustainability implications of utilizing RHA and nanomaterial blends extend beyond structural integrity. Reduced dependence on conventional cement leads to decreased energy usage and carbon emissions, aligning with global goals for sustainable development. The production process of conventional cement is not only carbon-intensive but also demands vast quantities of raw materials and water. By adopting RHA-based composites in construction, the industry can pivot towards eco-friendlier methodologies that preserve natural resources while still meeting the infrastructural needs of an ever-growing global population.</p>
<p>However, the journey towards widespread adoption of RHA and nanomaterial composites is fraught with challenges. One major concern is the variability in the properties of RHA, which can be influenced by factors such as the type of rice, burning temperatures, and methods of processing. Such variations can affect the performance of cement composites significantly. Researchers are actively investigating ways to standardize the characteristics of RHA, ensuring consistency and reliability in its application for construction.</p>
<p>To improve the understanding of the interactions between RHA, nanomaterials, and conventional cement, detailed studies into their microstructural properties are necessary. It is essential to explore how the morphology and size distribution of RHA and nanomaterials influence the overall performance of the cement composites. Advanced imaging techniques and analytical methods play a crucial role here, revealing the nuances of particle interactions and the development of creating durable bonding phases.</p>
<p>The collaboration between academia and industry is crucial for accelerating the transition from laboratory-scale innovations to commercial applications. As researchers unveil the potential of RHA-blended cement composites, industry stakeholders must engage by conducting field trials that validate the findings through real-world performance assessments. This connection between research and application not only strengthens the empirical base but also fuels investment in novel material solutions.</p>
<p>Furthermore, public awareness of environmental issues linked to construction practices fosters an environment conducive to the acceptance of RHA and nanomaterial composites. As builders and consumers increasingly prefer sustainable options, there is mounting pressure on manufacturers to innovate. Demonstrating the benefits of RHA and nanomaterial composites effectively to policymakers, contractors, and the public could stimulate wider implementation and a shift in building material standards.</p>
<p>In the broader context, the integration of materials like RHA represents a significant opportunity to build resilient infrastructure that can withstand future challenges. Climate change, urbanization, and resource scarcity are pressing issues that demand innovative solutions in construction. RHA and nanomaterials, accordingly, represent not only a scientific advancement but also a response to these existential concerns about resource and environmental sustainability.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the future of cement composites leans toward utilizing waste and innovative materials like rice husk ash and nanomaterials. The ongoing research demonstrates a promising path towards developing materials that optimize performance while aligning with sustainability goals. Addressing the challenges inherent in using these materials will be crucial as the construction industry moves towards greener alternatives. With continued research and collaboration between scientists and industry professionals, the transformation of the built environment into a sustainable, eco-friendly space may indeed become a reality.</p>
<p>Through years of persistence in research and development, it is becoming evident that building materials have the potential to undergo a monumental transformation. The exploration and utilization of low-impact alternatives, like RHA and nanomaterial blends, can pave the way for sustainable construction practices, addressing both immediate and long-term challenges in a world that increasingly depends on resilience and innovation in its building processes.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research</strong>: Rice husk ash and nanomaterial-blended cement composites</p>
<p><strong>Article Title</strong>: Rice husk ash and nanomaterial-blended cement composites: a review</p>
<p><strong>Article References</strong>:<br />
Samarajeewa, P., Buddika, S., Yapa, H. <i>et al.</i> Rice husk ash and nanomaterial-blended cement composites: a review.<br />
<i>Environ Sci Pollut Res</i>  (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-37361-9</p>
<p><strong>Image Credits</strong>: AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI</strong>: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-37361-9</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Rice husk ash, nanomaterials, cement composites, sustainability, pozzolanic activity, construction, eco-friendly materials, durability, waste management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">125388</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
