<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>carboxylates &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/carboxylates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 15:48:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Reactor Design and pH Steer Microbes That Turn Xylose Into Valuable Carboxylates</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/reactor-design-and-ph-steer-microbes-that-turn-xylose-into-valuable-carboxylates/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Townsend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 15:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bifidobacterium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioprocess engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[butyrate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carboxylate production from lignocellulosic biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carboxylates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chain elongation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conversion of plant biomass into bio-based chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSTR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design of bioreactors for targeted carboxylate yields]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineering microbial communities for organic acid production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lignocellulosic biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microbial community dynamics in xylose fermentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microbial fermentation of xylose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mixed culture fermentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pH-controlled bioreactors for microbial synthesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Role of pH in microbial metabolic pathways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequencing batch reactor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sporolactobacillus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable bioconversion of hemicellulose sugars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valorization of agricultural and forestry residues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xylose]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=265175</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study shows that pH, loading rate, and reactor configuration predictably steer mixed microbial communities fermenting xylose toward lactate, butyrate, or medium-chain carboxylates.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xylose rarely makes headlines, yet it is arguably one of the most important sugars on the planet. As the second most abundant sugar on Earth, it forms the backbone of hemicellulose in lignocellulosic biomass, the woody and fibrous material that plants build from. Every year, agriculture and forestry generate staggering quantities of this material, and most of it still ends up burned or left to decompose. A new study published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology suggests that with the right engineering choices, this overlooked sugar stream could be converted by microbial communities into carboxylates, a family of organic acids and their derivatives that serve as building blocks for fuels, plastics, and animal feed additives. The research, led by Juan Iglesias-Riobó of the Universidade de Santiago de Compostela together with colleagues at the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research in Leipzig, shows that the identity of the final product depends less on the microbes themselves than on the conditions engineers impose on them.</p>
<p>The team set out to address a persistent gap in the literature. While glucose fermentation by open mixed cultures has been studied extensively, xylose fermentation has received far less attention, even though any realistic biorefinery built on plant biomass would have to process both sugars. Xylose is a five-carbon sugar, chemically distinct from the six-carbon glucose, and microorganisms handle it differently. Understanding which community members bloom when xylose is the sole carbon source, and which products they preferentially excrete, is therefore essential for anyone hoping to design an industrial process around lignocellulosic feedstocks.</p>
<p>To answer these questions, the researchers ran a carefully controlled comparison. Four bioreactors were inoculated with identical biomass drawn from a sewage sludge anaerobic digester and operated at a mesophilic 37 degrees Celsius. Two of the vessels were continuous stirred-tank reactors, or CSTRs, in which fresh medium flows in and spent culture flows out continuously, washing cells through the system at a rate set by the hydraulic retention time. The other two were sequencing batch reactors, or SBRs, which operate in repeated cycles of filling, reaction, settling, and decanting, so that biomass is retained and only the liquid phase is exchanged. The CSTRs ran for up to 180 days across pH values from 4.5 to 6.0 and hydraulic retention times from half a day to one full day. The SBRs were held at pH 6 and tested organic loading rates of 12 and 24 grams of chemical oxygen demand per litre per day, alongside the same range of retention times.</p>
<p>Throughout the experiments, the researchers tracked both the chemical output of each reactor and the composition of its microbial community, using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing to inventory which bacterial genera were present and in what proportions. This combination of process data and community profiling allowed them to link specific operating conditions to specific microbial players and, in turn, to specific fermentation products. The result is a kind of operating manual for steering open-culture xylose fermentation, one of the most detailed pictures yet of how engineering choices cascade down through ecology to chemistry.</p>
<p>The most striking finding concerned pH. When the reactors were held at a sharply acidic pH of 4.5, the communities were dominated by Sporolactobacillus, a lactic acid bacterium well adapted to low-pH environments, and the product spectrum shifted decisively toward lactate. At the milder pH range of 5.0 to 6.0, a different regime took hold: Bifidobacterium rose to dominance and the reactors produced butyrate as the principal carboxylate. This switch matters because butyrate is a more valuable and more versatile target than lactate in the context of carboxylate platform chemistry. Butyrate can serve as a precursor for further chain elongation into medium-chain fatty acids such as caproate, which have higher energy density and market value. The study thus identifies pH control as the primary lever for choosing between a lactic acid process and a butyrate process when fermenting xylose with undefined mixed cultures.</p>
<p>Reactor configuration proved to be a second, independent lever. The sequencing batch reactors consistently supported higher microbial diversity than the continuous stirred-tank reactors, and they showed greater selectivity toward medium-chain carboxylates, particularly when the systems were pushed into organic overload at the higher loading rate of 24 grams of chemical oxygen demand per litre per day. Under those stressed conditions, the SBR communities became enriched in Veillonella, Megasphaera, and Pseudoramibacter, genera associated with the consumption of lactate and its conversion into longer-chain acids. This is a crucial mechanistic insight: lactate produced by primary fermenters can act as an intermediate that chain-elongating organisms pick up and extend, and the batch-style operation of the SBR appears to create conditions that favour this handoff between functional guilds.</p>
<p>The CSTRs told a different story about robustness. When these reactors were subjected to hydraulic overload, meaning the retention time was shortened and cells were washed out faster, the composition of the communities shifted measurably, yet the product profiles remained largely intact. The authors interpret this as evidence of functional redundancy: multiple species in the community can perform the same metabolic role, so when some are lost, others expand to fill the gap and the chemistry stays on course. For process engineers, this resilience is reassuring, because it suggests that continuous reactors fermenting xylose can absorb disturbances in flow without catastrophic changes in output, even though the underlying ecology is being reshaped.</p>
<p>Why does all of this matter beyond the laboratory? Carboxylate production from mixed cultures is one of the leading candidates for a genuinely flexible biorefinery platform. Unlike pure-culture fermentation, which requires sterile feed, defined strains, and tight contamination control, open mixed cultures can accept complex, unsterilized waste streams and still function. The trade-off has always been control: without a defined inoculum, the product spectrum depends on which organisms win the ecological competition. This study demonstrates that the competition can be rigged, predictably, through mundane engineering parameters. Lower the pH and you select for lactate producers; raise it slightly and butyrate specialists take over; switch reactor architecture and you open the door to chain elongation and medium-chain products.</p>
<p>The work also carries a broader ecological lesson. The same inoculum, the same substrate, and the same temperature produced markedly different communities and product profiles depending solely on pH, loading regime, and reactor type. This is a vivid demonstration that in open microbial systems, the environment is the selector. The researchers&#8217; finding that SBR operation enriched known chain-elongating taxa under organic overload hints that deliberate stress application, rather than avoidance of stress, could become a design strategy in its own right. Overloading a reactor is normally something operators try to prevent, but here it appears to have pushed the community toward more reduced, longer-chain, higher-value products.</p>
<p>There remain open questions before these results translate into industrial practice. The experiments used xylose as a single substrate, whereas real lignocellulosic hydrolysates contain glucose, other sugars, inhibitors, and nutrients that will alter the competitive landscape. Long-term stability, product titres, and downstream recovery costs will all need attention. Nevertheless, the study provides a rigorous, quantitative foundation for the next generation of experiments, and it was supported by the Spanish Government through the Cell4Chem project under the ERACoBioTech framework. As the pressure to replace petrochemical supply chains with biological ones intensifies, work like this shows that the path from plant waste to platform chemicals may run not through exotic engineered organisms, but through the disciplined manipulation of the microbial communities that nature already provides.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Microbial xylose fermentation to carboxylates under varying process parameters and reactor configurations</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Effect of process parameters and reactor configuration on microbial communities fermenting xylose to carboxylates</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Effect of process parameters and reactor configuration on microbial communities fermenting xylose to carboxylates. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-026-14064-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-026-14064-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-026-14064-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00253-026-14064-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> xylose, carboxylates, mixed culture fermentation, Bifidobacterium, Sporolactobacillus, butyrate, chain elongation, CSTR, sequencing batch reactor, lignocellulosic biomass, microbial communities, bioprocess engineering</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">265175</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beetle Larva Gut Inspires Three-Stage Reactor That Turns Wheat Straw Into Methane and Carboxylates</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/beetle-larva-gut-inspires-three-stage-reactor-that-turns-wheat-straw-into-methane-and-carboxylates/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 14:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anaerobic digestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beetle larva digestion mimicry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioenergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biogas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomimetic bioenergy production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomimicry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carboxylates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compartmentalized digestion system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gut microbiome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insect-inspired bioreactor design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lignocellulose breakdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lignocellulosic biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lignocellulosic biomass bioconversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methanogenesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial methane generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbiome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pachnoda marginata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second-generation biofuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable agricultural waste utilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three-stage anaerobic digestion reactor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volatile fatty acids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volatile fatty acids fermentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat straw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat straw to biogas]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=195191</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[German researchers built a three-stage anaerobic digestion system modeled on the sun beetle larva gut that converts wheat straw into methane and volatile fatty acids without co-substrates.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wheat straw is one of the most abundant agricultural residues on the planet, yet its tough lignocellulosic architecture makes it notoriously resistant to microbial breakdown in industrial biogas plants. Now, researchers at the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) in Leipzig, Germany, have taken an unusual route to unlock this stubborn feedstock: they modeled an anaerobic digestion system on the digestive tract of the sun beetle larva, <em>Pachnoda marginata</em>, an insect renowned for its remarkable ability to degrade lignocellulose-rich biomass. The study, published open access in <em>Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts</em>, describes a three-stage semi-continuous reactor cascade that converts wheat straw into volatile fatty acids and biogas without any co-substrates, offering a fresh biomimetic blueprint for second-generation bioenergy production.</p>
<p>The sun beetle larva served as more than a source of inspiration in name only. Its gut is functionally compartmentalized: the midgut excels at hydrolyzing complex plant polymers and fermenting the resulting sugars into volatile fatty acids (VFAs), while the hindgut hosts methanogenic archaea that consume these intermediates and release methane. The research team, led by Bruna G. Schroeder and corresponding author Marcell Nikolausz, translated this spatial division of labor into hardware. Three stirred tank reactors were connected in series and operated at 37 degrees Celsius. The first two vessels were configured to emulate the larval midgut, favoring hydrolysis and acidification, while the third was optimized to mirror the hindgut environment and promote methanogenesis.</p>
<p>A key design feature was the inclusion of polyurethane foam inserts within the reactors. These porous carriers provide surface area for microbial attachment, helping to retain slow-growing cellulolytic and methanogenic organisms that would otherwise be washed out at practical hydraulic loading rates. Retaining biomass is a persistent challenge in anaerobic digestion of particulate substrates such as straw, where solids residence time and microbial residence time must be decoupled to keep the process stable. The foam carriers, together with the serial configuration, were intended to create distinct ecological niches along the reactor train, just as the different gut compartments do in the insect.</p>
<p>The system was fed semi-continuously with ground wheat straw suspended in an alkaline medium, and the reactors were inoculated with enrichment cultures derived directly from the midgut and hindgut of sun beetle larvae. Three operating conditions were tested with increasing organic loading rates, allowing the team to probe how the system responded when the microbial community was pushed to process more substrate per unit volume and time. This semi-continuous regime, rather than batch operation, was crucial for assessing whether a beetle-inspired design could function under realistic conditions approaching those of an industrial digester.</p>
<p>The results revealed a clear trade-off between throughput and conversion efficiency. The highest conversion of biomass to methane occurred at the lowest organic loading rate and the longest retention time. Under that regime, the process achieved a methane yield of 148 milliliters under normal conditions per gram of volatile solids, with volatile solids degradation reaching 44 percent. While these figures remain below the yields obtainable from pre-treated or co-digested straw in conventional systems, they are notable because the process relied on mono-digestion of untreated, merely ground straw, without thermochemical pretreatment, enzymatic additives, or co-substrates that typically inflate costs and complexity.</p>
<p>Molecular monitoring of the microbial communities showed that the reactor ecosystems had been shaped decisively in favor of lignocellulose degradation. Bacterial taxa enriched in the system included families well known for cellulose and hemicellulose deconstruction, among them Dysgonomonadaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Marinilabiliaceae and Ruminococcaceae. These organisms collectively attack the crystalline cellulose and hemicellulosic fractions of straw, hydrolyzing them into sugars that are then fermented into VFAs such as acetate, propionate and butyrate. The staged design allowed hydrolytic and acidogenic populations to dominate the first two reactors while shielding the methanogenic stage from fluctuations in substrate supply, echoing the physiological separation observed along the beetle larva gut.</p>
<p>The archaeal side of the story proved equally dynamic. Over the course of operation, the methanogenic community shifted from a predominance of <em>Methanosarcina</em>, a metabolically versatile genus capable of both acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis, toward <em>Methanobacterium</em> and <em>Methanoculleus</em>, two genera that rely primarily on hydrogen and carbon dioxide to produce methane. This shift suggests that the hydrogenotrophic route became the dominant methane-forming pathway as the system matured, a pattern often associated with stable syntrophy between fermenting bacteria and methanogens under lignocellulose-fed conditions.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most broadly significant finding emerged when the authors compared their system with other straw-utilizing bioreactors reported in the literature. Across studies that differ widely in inoculum source and process conditions, a consistent core microbiome composed of the phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria appears to underpin the anaerobic digestion of lignocellulose-rich materials. This convergence implies that engineers need not obsess over sourcing exotic inocula for straw digestion; instead, process design and operating conditions can steer a functionally equivalent core community toward efficient performance. For a field where inoculum provenance is often treated as a make-or-break variable, the demonstration that the same three phyla repeatedly carry out the work is a unifying insight.</p>
<p>The authors conclude that the beetle-inspired cascade was stable throughout operation and capable of converting wheat straw into both methane and carboxylates, the latter representing valuable platform chemicals for a range of industrial applications. Because VFAs can be harvested as products in their own right, the staged configuration opens the door to a dual-product strategy: acids from the front end, biogas from the back end. At the same time, the team is candid about the system&#8217;s limitations. Methane yields must rise for economic viability, and further adaptations are suggested to improve anaerobic digestion performance while decreasing both assembly and operating costs. Refinements might include longer acclimation periods, improved biomass retention, or mild pretreatment strategies compatible with the biomimetic concept.</p>
<p>Beyond its immediate numbers, the study demonstrates the practical power of biomimicry in bioprocess engineering. Rather than copying a single enzyme or microbe from an insect, the researchers copied an architecture, a compartmentalized flow scheme in which hydrolysis, acidification and methanogenesis each receive their own optimized habitat. As global agriculture generates hundreds of millions of tonnes of straw annually and biogas seeks robust pathways away from energy crops and food competition, designs that let nature&#8217;s own lignocellulose specialists, from beetle larvae to their gut microbes, guide reactor engineering could help turn one of farming&#8217;s most underused residues into a dependable feedstock for renewable energy and green chemistry.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> A biomimetic three-stage anaerobic digestion system inspired by the sun beetle larva gut for converting wheat straw into volatile fatty acids and biogas.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Anaerobic mono-digestion of wheat straw in a three-stage semi-continuous system inspired by a beetle larva gut</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Schroeder, B. G., Bhattacherjee, R., Bonatelli, M. L., da Rocha, U. N., Sträuber, H., Harms, H., &amp; Nikolausz, M. (2026). Anaerobic mono-digestion of wheat straw in a three-stage semi-continuous system inspired by a beetle larva gut. <em>Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, 19</em>(1), Article 70. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-026-02819-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-026-02819-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-026-02819-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s13068-026-02819-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> anaerobic digestion, wheat straw, biomimicry, Pachnoda marginata, gut microbiome, biogas, volatile fatty acids, lignocellulosic biomass, methanogenesis, carboxylates, bioenergy, microbiome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">195191</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
