<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>carbon-to-nitrogen ratio &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/carbon-to-nitrogen-ratio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 01:25:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>What Happens When Roots Die? New Experiment Rethinks How We Measure Underground Decay</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/what-happens-when-roots-die-new-experiment-rethinks-how-we-measure-underground-decay/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 01:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[belowground biomass decay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[belowground decomposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon-to-nitrogen ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought-induced senescence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecologically significant root decay processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measuring belowground decay rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology in root decomposition studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant and Soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant and soil interaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[potassium content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhizomes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[root and rhizome decay experiments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[root decay measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[root senescence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[root traits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil carbon release from roots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbial activity in root decay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil nutrient recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specific root length]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[split-root method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underground organic matter decay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underground plant material decomposition]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=269587</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A microcosm experiment on four Carex species shows that healthy roots and rhizomes decompose at rates comparable to senescing ones, but the method used to induce senescence leaves distinct chemical fingerprints on the tissue.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beneath every meadow lies a hidden economy of death and renewal. Roots and rhizomes die continuously, and their decay releases carbon and nutrients back into the soil, shaping everything from grassland fertility to global carbon budgets. Yet scientists have long struggled with a deceptively simple question: when we want to measure how fast belowground plant material decomposes, which material should we actually collect? A new study published in the journal Plant and Soil by Szilvia Márta Neumann of the University of South Bohemia and colleagues tackles this methodological dilemma head-on, and its findings may change how ecologists design decomposition experiments belowground.</p>
<p>The problem stems from a well-known asymmetry between what we know about leaves and what we know about roots. For leaves, the rules of decomposition research are firmly established. Ecologists almost always use naturally senesced leaf litter, the brown material that falls in autumn, because plants systematically withdraw nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus from leaves before shedding them. This nutrient resorption means that green leaves and dead leaves differ dramatically in chemistry, and consequently in how fast microbes and detritivores can break them down. Using green leaves in a leaf decomposition experiment would give misleadingly fast decay rates. But roots do not follow the same script. Roots die underground, often without a visible signal, and researchers cannot simply wait for a root to drop the way a leaf does.</p>
<p>This leaves belowground ecologists with an awkward choice. Some studies use living, healthy root material, assuming it approximates dead roots well enough. Others try to induce senescence artificially, for example by withholding water and letting drought kill the plant, hoping this mimics natural root death. Still others dig up field material and sort senescing from healthy organs by eye. Each approach carries assumptions that have rarely been tested. If the choice of method systematically changes the measured decomposability, then decades of belowground decomposition data may be harder to compare than anyone realized. Neumann and her team set out to test exactly this, using four closely related sedge species from the genus Carex as their experimental subjects.</p>
<p>The experimental design was elegant in its simplicity. The researchers grew the sedges in pots and then applied three different ways of obtaining belowground material. In the first treatment, they induced senescence across the whole plant by imposing a drought, killing both shoots and the entire belowground system together. In the second, they used a split-pot technique: the root system was divided between two connected containers, and drought was applied to only one side, so that part of the belowground system senesced while the rest remained hydrated and healthy. This clever manipulation allowed the researchers to compare senescing and non-senescing organs within the very same individual plants, controlling for genotype and growing conditions. In the third approach, they sampled roots and rhizomes directly from the field, classifying material as senescing or healthy by its appearance, which represents the observational reality most ecologists face.</p>
<p>All of this material, gathered through the three routes, was then subjected to a standardized microcosm decomposition experiment, in which the plant tissues decompose under controlled conditions so that mass loss can be tracked precisely. Alongside decomposition rates, the team measured a suite of underlying tissue traits, including concentrations of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio, and specific root length, a morphological measure of how finely branched and thin the roots are. These traits are the currency of plant ecology, thought to govern how quickly microbes can colonize and consume dead organic matter.</p>
<p>The headline result was surprising: for roots and rhizomes, it may not matter much whether the material is alive or dying. Across the four Carex species, the decomposability of healthy, non-senescing organs was generally comparable to that of senescing organs, for both roots and rhizomes. This stands in sharp contrast to the leaf literature, where green and senesced leaves routinely differ because of heavy nutrient resorption before leaf fall. The implication is that belowground organs may lack the dramatic pre-death chemistry shift that makes aboveground decomposition studies so methodologically sensitive. If this holds more broadly, researchers could use healthy root material as a reasonable proxy for estimating decomposability within Carex species, a considerable practical simplification, since obtaining truly senesced roots is notoriously difficult.</p>
<p>Yet the study also revealed that the devil is in the details of how senescence is induced. Although the overall effect sizes were small, the different senescence methods produced contrasting responses. In the split-pot treatment, where drought struck only part of the root system, senescing roots actually decomposed significantly faster than healthy ones, and they carried higher nutrient contents. The likely explanation is physiological: when only part of a plant&#8217;s belowground system is stressed, the plant may abandon that portion, withdrawing little from it or even reallocating nutrients in ways that leave the senescing roots nutrient-rich and palatable to decomposers. In field-collected samples, by contrast, senescing roots generally decomposed the slowest of all. Field senescence may reflect a different, slower process, perhaps involving older organs that have already lost nutrients over time, or material whose appearance-based classification captures a different biological state than experimentally induced drought death.</p>
<p>The trait analysis added a technical layer to the story. When the researchers asked which tissue characteristics best explained variation in root decomposability, potassium content emerged as the strongest single predictor, explaining most of the variability, followed by specific root length and the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio. Potassium is a highly mobile element in plant tissues, involved in osmotic regulation and enzyme activation, and its prominence here suggests that the ionic environment of decaying roots matters more than previously appreciated. The importance of specific root length echoes a growing body of work linking root economics, thin, cheap, fast-turning roots versus thick, persistent ones, to ecosystem processes. Notably, the study also found that the different senescence methods induced contrasting trait responses themselves, meaning that drought-induced senescence and field senescence do not simply produce the same tissue chemistry.</p>
<p>Why does this matter beyond the world of sedge specialists? Belowground organs are major contributors to carbon and nutrient cycling. Fine roots are among the largest sources of soil organic matter, and rhizomes, the horizontal underground stems of clonal plants like Carex, can persist for years before dying in bulk. Estimates of how fast this material decays feed directly into models of soil carbon storage and nutrient supply, which in turn inform predictions about climate change feedbacks and ecosystem management. If the methodological choice of healthy versus senescing material, or drought-induced versus field-collected tissue, shifts measured decomposability, then those model inputs carry hidden uncertainty. By showing that healthy material is a defensible proxy within Carex, while also documenting that senescence methods leave distinct trait fingerprints, the study gives the field both reassurance and a caution.</p>
<p>The authors are careful about the limits of their conclusions. The work was conducted in microcosms with four congeneric species, and the effects of senescence method, while statistically detectable, were of small magnitude. Whether the contrasting responses observed between split-pot and field material translate into meaningful differences in real-world belowground decomposition remains to be tested, and the researchers flag this as an exciting avenue for future research. Still, the study marks a rare direct comparison of experimental and observational approaches to a problem that has quietly undermined belowground ecology for decades. As climate change intensifies droughts across grasslands and wetlands, understanding how drought-induced root death alters the chemistry and decay of the material entering the soil becomes not just a technical question but a predictive one. For now, the underground half of decomposition science has gained a clearer map of its own blind spots, and a hint that, underground, death may be far less transformative than it is above.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Methodological comparison of experimental and observational approaches for assessing decomposability of senescing versus healthy roots and rhizomes in Carex species</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Assessing plant belowground decomposability: comparing experimental and observational approaches</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Neumann, S. M., Janíková, E., Konečná, M., Švancárová, T., Applová, M., Blažek, P., Lisner, A., Vörös, A. F., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Götzenberger, L., Lepš, J., &amp; Segrestin, J. (2026). Assessing plant belowground decomposability: comparing experimental and observational approaches. <em>Plant and Soil</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09032-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09032-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09032-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11104-026-09032-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> belowground decomposition, root senescence, drought-induced senescence, Carex, rhizomes, root traits, potassium content, specific root length, carbon-to-nitrogen ratio, split-root method, plant and soil, nutrient cycling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">269587</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Invasive Roots Do Not Silence Soil Microbes, They Just Make Them Wasteful</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/invasive-roots-do-not-silence-soil-microbes-they-just-make-them-wasteful/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan Morrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 11:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biogeochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biogeochemistry of invasive plant roots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon-to-nitrogen ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Himalayan balsam effect on riparian soil microbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of Impatiens glandulifera on soil ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impatiens glandulifera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasion biology and microbial efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invasive plant impact on soil microbial communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invasive Species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laboratory microcosm studies on invasive plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial biomass conversion of plant carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial respiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microcosm experiment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[native vs invasive plant root interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phenolics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant roots influence on soil carbon cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riparian soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riparian soil microbial dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[root exudates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbial community resilience to invasion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbial response to invasive roots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stoichiometry]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=222222</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A laboratory microcosm study shows that root extracts of invasive Impatiens glandulifera do not suppress soil microbial activity but instead reduce the efficiency with which riparian soil microbes convert carbon into biomass, driven primarily by the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio of the root input.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Himalayan balsam, Impatiens glandulifera, is one of the most conspicuous plant invaders of European riverbanks, towering over native vegetation each summer and dying back in autumn to leave bare, erodible soil. Ecologists have long suspected that its belowground influence is as dramatic as its aboveground presence, reshaping the microbial communities that govern how carbon is stored or released in riparian soils. A new laboratory experiment, published in the journal Biogeochemistry, puts that suspicion to a rigorous test, and the results are surprising in a way that could change how scientists think about invasion biology altogether. The study, led by Aira Sacha Ferrer and colleagues at RPTU University Kaiserslautern-Landau in Germany, found that the invasive plant&#8217;s roots do not poison or suppress the soil microbial community. Instead, they change something subtler and arguably more consequential: how efficiently soil microbes convert carbon from plant roots into their own biomass.</p>
<p>The research team set up a controlled microcosm experiment using soil that had never been invaded by Himalayan balsam, collected from a riparian site. Into this soil they introduced aqueous extracts prepared from the roots of two plants: the invasive Impatiens glandulifera and the native stinging nettle, Urtica dioica. Root extracts were used to mimic the natural processes of root lysis, the breakdown of dead root tissue, and root exudation, the release of soluble compounds from living roots. By applying the extracts at two different concentration levels, the researchers could simulate both light and heavy inputs of root-derived carbon, and then watch, over a 21-day incubation, how the soil microbial community responded to each chemically distinct food source.</p>
<p>The measurement strategy combined several complementary techniques. Microbial respiration was tracked with the MicroResp system, which quantifies how much carbon dioxide the community releases as it metabolizes substrates, while enzyme assays revealed which classes of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus-acquiring enzymes the microbes deployed. Substrate-induced respiration provided an estimate of the active microbial biomass, effectively measuring how much living microbial material the community could build when given an easily usable food pulse. In parallel, the researchers characterized the chemistry of the root extracts themselves, measuring dissolved carbon, dissolved nitrogen, and total phenolic content, the latter being a group of plant secondary metabolites often invoked as chemical weapons against soil biota.</p>
<p>The first headline finding is a negative result that matters. The extracts from the invasive plant did not suppress microbial activity. Despite its reputation as a chemical aggressor, Impatiens glandulifera root extract did not shut down respiration or enzyme production in the recipient soil. What differed was the physiological efficiency of the community. When soils received the native nettle extract, the microbes responded with high substrate-induced respiration, a signature of biomass accretion, meaning they were successfully converting the supplied carbon into new microbial cells. When soils received the invasive plant&#8217;s extract, the community showed relatively higher basal respiration but low biomass formation. In plain terms, the microbes were burning the carbon off as carbon dioxide rather than building their bodies with it, a pattern the authors describe as lower physiological efficiency.</p>
<p>To understand why, the team turned to stoichiometric modelling, an approach that examines how the balance of elements in a resource constrains what organisms can do with it. The analysis identified the dissolved carbon-to-nitrogen ratio of the root extracts as the primary driver of the inefficiency. Microbes need nitrogen in roughly predictable proportions to build proteins and nucleic acids; when a carbon-rich, nitrogen-poor substrate arrives, they must either invest energy in acquiring nitrogen from elsewhere or simply respire the excess carbon away. The invasive plant&#8217;s root chemistry apparently pushed the community toward this second, wasteful fate. The implication is striking: the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio of root inputs, a simple chemical property, may explain shifts in soil organic carbon cycling better than the biogeographic status of the plant that produced them.</p>
<p>The experiment also revealed that time, not just identity, shapes these interactions. Temporal dynamics over the three-week incubation were governed more by the concentration of the substrate than by which plant species it came from. Low-dose treatments of both species displayed what the authors call boom-and-bust dynamics: an initial burst of microbial activity as easily degradable compounds were consumed, followed by a crash as the labile fraction was depleted, likely accompanied by recycling of microbial necromass, the dead remains of the first wave of responders. High-dose treatments, by contrast, produced a monotonic response, with activity sustained more steadily throughout the incubation, presumably because the larger substrate pool buffered the community against rapid depletion.</p>
<p>One of the most intriguing observations concerns phenolics, the aromatic plant compounds frequently cast as antimicrobial defenses. Rather than showing a steady decline, the total phenolic content of the treatments exhibited temporal spikes, and these spikes were linked to a process the authors describe as the possible enzymatic unmasking of reactive moieties. The idea is that as microbes selectively harvest the most labile carbon compounds first, the remaining pool becomes relatively enriched in phenolic structures that were previously bound up or diluted within the mixture. Enzymatic activity may then expose these reactive groups, causing measured phenolics to rise even as total carbon falls. This dynamic complicates the simple narrative in which invasive plants dump defensive chemicals into the soil and the microbes suffer; instead, phenolic availability appears to be an emergent property of microbial processing itself.</p>
<p>For the science of invasion ecology, the study&#8217;s message is a call to look past species labels and into elemental budgets. Much of the literature on invasive plants assumes that novel secondary metabolites are the main mechanism by which invaders rewire belowground processes. This experiment suggests that, at least for carbon processing in riparian soils, the stoichiometric quality of the root input, particularly its carbon-to-nitrogen balance, can be the decisive variable. If an invasive species happens to produce roots with a chemistry similar to a native counterpart, the microbial consequences may be similar too, regardless of where the plant evolved. Conversely, a native plant with unusual root chemistry could exert effects conventionally attributed to invaders. The biogeographic origin of a plant, in other words, may be a poor proxy for its biogeochemical behavior.</p>
<p>There are also practical implications for carbon accounting in floodplain ecosystems. Riparian soils are hotspots of carbon cycling, sitting at the interface between aquatic and terrestrial systems and subject to frequent pulses of organic matter. If invasive plants like Himalayan balsam deliver root carbon in a form that microbes respire rather than assimilate, invasion could shift these soils toward greater carbon loss as carbon dioxide and reduced microbial biomass, a change with consequences for both local food webs and landscape-scale carbon storage. The finding that low-dose inputs trigger boom-and-bust cycles adds further nuance, because such pulses may generate bursts of respiration followed by periods of dormancy, making carbon fluxes harder to predict from single measurements.</p>
<p>The authors are careful to frame their work as a microcosm experiment, and its simplifications are part of its power. By isolating root extracts from living plants, excluding the full rhizosphere community, and holding soil conditions constant, they could attribute differences in microbial response to the chemistry of the inputs themselves. The next step for the field will be testing whether these stoichiometric rules hold in the field, where roots interact with mycorrhizal fungi, fauna, fluctuating water tables, and seasonal phenology. For now, the study offers a memorable reframing: the invader in the soil story may not be the plant at all, but the elemental ratio it delivers. When it comes to soil carbon, what matters may be less where a root came from than what it is made of.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Microbial carbon processing responses to native versus invasive root inputs in riparian soil</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Microbial carbon processing in a riparian soil: a microcosm experiment on responses to native vs. invasive root input</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Ferrer, A. S., Muñoz, K., Nguyen, T.-T., &amp; Diehl, D. (2026). Microbial carbon processing in a riparian soil: a microcosm experiment on responses to native vs. invasive root input. <em>Biogeochemistry</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-026-01377-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-026-01377-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-026-01377-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10533-026-01377-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> invasive species, Impatiens glandulifera, riparian soil, soil microbiology, carbon cycling, stoichiometry, root exudates, microbial respiration, phenolics, biogeochemistry, microcosm experiment, carbon-to-nitrogen ratio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">222222</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fungi in Chinese mangrove sediments assemble in ways that shift with scale</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/fungi-in-chinese-mangrove-sediments-assemble-in-ways-that-shift-with-scale/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan Morrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 10:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biogeography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon-to-nitrogen ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese mangrove ecosystem biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chytridiomycota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-occurrence network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispersal limitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological drivers of fungal assemblages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental factors shaping fungal distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungal communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungi-prokaryote interactions in sediments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-throughput sequencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of temperature and dispersal on fungi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mangrove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mangrove sediment fungal communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial diversity in coastal wetlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial ecology of mangrove sediments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiscale analysis of fungal communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rozellomycota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salinity and nutrient chemistry in mangroves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scale-dependent fungal community assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sediment microbiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sediment sampling and fungal diversity analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structural equation modeling]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=222066</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A survey of 300 sediment samples from Chinese mangrove wetlands shows that fungal communities are shaped by temperature and dispersal limitation at regional scales, salinity and nutrients locally, and cross-kingdom interactions at the micro scale.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Along the southeastern coast of China, where mangrove forests grip the boundary between land and sea, the mud beneath the roots is home to a fungal world that scientists have only now begun to map in detail. A new study published in Mycology: An International Journal on Fungal Biology reports one of the most systematic surveys to date of fungal communities in mangrove sediments, and its central finding is striking: the forces that shape which fungi live where depend fundamentally on the scale at which you look. At the regional level, temperature and the difficulty of dispersal dominate; at the local level, salinity and nutrient chemistry take over; and at the smallest scale, the interactions between fungi and their prokaryotic neighbors leave their mark on community structure.</p>
<p>The research was led by Dr. Meng Li of the Institute for Advanced Study at Shenzhen University, working with colleagues across six national nature reserves that protect seven representative mangrove wetlands along the Chinese coast. In total, the team collected 300 sediment samples, a sampling intensity that allowed them to compare fungal assemblages both among distant wetlands and within individual sites. Mangrove wetlands are among the most demanding habitats on Earth for microbial life. They sit at the tropical and subtropical land-sea interface, where sediments experience high salinity, low oxygen availability, and an abundance of organic matter, conditions that together create a powerful environmental filter for any organism attempting to persist there.</p>
<p>Fungi matter enormously in these systems. They are among the few organisms capable of efficiently decomposing lignocellulose, the tough structural material of plant tissues, and their activity drives much of the nutrient cycling that sustains mangrove food webs. Despite this ecological importance, the diversity, biogeographic distribution, and assembly mechanisms of sediment fungal communities in mangroves had remained poorly characterized, a gap the new study set out to close with a combination of high-throughput sequencing and ecological modeling.</p>
<p>Methodologically, the team employed dual-amplicon high-throughput sequencing, simultaneously targeting the fungal internal transcribed spacer 2 region and the prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene. This design allowed fungal and prokaryotic communities to be characterized from the same samples, opening the door to direct analysis of cross-kingdom relationships. The sequencing effort recovered 14,771 fungal operational taxonomic units, distributed across 15 phyla, 51 classes, and 594 genera. Perhaps the most humbling number in the dataset is this: roughly one-third of the observed fungal diversity could not be assigned to any known phylum. Mangrove sediments, it turns out, harbor a substantial reservoir of fungi that are effectively unknown to science, lineages whose ecological roles remain entirely unexplored.</p>
<p>The survey also highlighted the prominence of early-diverging fungal lineages. Rozellomycota and Chytridiomycota, groups that branch near the base of the fungal tree of life, proved to be relatively diverse and widely distributed across the sampled wetlands. Their prevalence in these sediments suggests that mangrove ecosystems may serve as important refugia for ancient fungal lineages, and it underscores how much of fungal evolutionary history remains concentrated in environments that have historically been undersampled by mycologists, who have traditionally focused on soils, forests, and freshwater systems.</p>
<p>When the researchers examined biogeographic patterns, a clear hierarchy of influences emerged. Geographic location exerted a stronger effect on fungal community composition than the identity of the mangrove plants themselves. Fungal communities clustered primarily by sampling site rather than by vegetation type, and two factors were associated with these patterns: mean annual temperature and dispersal limitation. The explanation likely lies in the fragmented geography of mangrove forests themselves. Because mangroves occur in patchy stands separated by stretches of unsuitable coastline, long-distance dispersal of fungal propagules between wetlands is restricted. Each forest effectively functions as a partially isolated microbial island, allowing communities to diverge over time through the combined action of environmental sorting and limited gene flow.</p>
<p>Zooming in to the local scale, the picture changes. Within individual wetlands, salinity and the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio emerged as the main environmental factors associated with variation in fungal community structure. Salinity acts as a physiological gatekeeper: high salt concentrations limit fungal growth to taxa capable of tolerating osmotic stress, filtering out sensitive lineages and favoring halotolerant specialists. The carbon-to-nitrogen ratio reflects the balance between carbon availability and nitrogen supply in the sediment. When this ratio is elevated, it signals an imbalance that may constrain which taxa can persist, because decomposer fungi require nitrogen to build the enzymes that break down carbon-rich plant litter. Intriguingly, total phosphorus showed an indirect positive association with fungal diversity, likely operating through its influence on nutrient availability and on the connectivity of the microbial co-occurrence network, rather than through any direct effect on fungal physiology.</p>
<p>To probe these biotic interactions, the team constructed a co-occurrence network from the most abundant fungal and prokaryotic taxa. The resulting network contained 777 nodes and 3,680 edges, and a remarkable 99 percent of those edges represented positive correlations, suggesting that coexistence and cooperation, rather than exclusion, dominate the visible structure of the mangrove sediment microbiome. Bacteria and archaea exhibited higher average connectivity than fungi and formed the structural backbone of the network. Yet certain fungal nodes occupied central positions, acting as potential bridges that link fungal and prokaryotic components of the community. These hub fungi may represent keystone taxa whose activities, perhaps through the decomposition of complex organic matter, create resources and conditions that shape the surrounding microbial neighborhood.</p>
<p>The analytical centerpiece of the study is a piecewise structural equation model, a statistical framework that allows researchers to test networks of hypothesized causal pathways rather than isolated correlations. Using this approach, the authors integrated their results into a three-tier model of fungal community assembly. At the regional scale, temperature and dispersal limitation filter which lineages can reach and survive in a given wetland. At the local scale, salinity and nutrient conditions, including the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio and phosphorus availability, further sort the regional species pool. At the micro scale, cross-kingdom interactions with bacteria and archaea fine-tune community structure. No single factor explains who lives in the mud; instead, nested layers of environmental and biological filtering operate simultaneously across spatial scales.</p>
<p>The implications extend beyond basic mycology. Mangrove wetlands are under sustained pressure from coastal development, sea-level rise, and changing salinity regimes, and the microbial communities that power their nutrient cycles will respond to these changes in ways that are only beginning to be understood. By establishing that salinity and nutrient chemistry govern local fungal assemblages while temperature and dispersal shape regional patterns, the study provides a predictive framework for anticipating how sediment fungal communities might shift as coastal environments warm and saltwater intrusion intensifies. Just as importantly, the large fraction of unclassified fungal diversity signals that a vast amount of functional novelty remains hidden in these sediments, potentially including enzymes relevant to lignocellulose degradation and other biotechnological applications. For now, the muddy forests of the Chinese coast have offered a rare, scale-resolved glimpse of the hidden fungal architecture beneath one of the planet&#8217;s most productive ecosystems, and that architecture turns out to be built layer by layer, from the regional climate down to the microscopic handshakes between species.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Scale-dependent assembly and biogeography of fungal communities in Chinese mangrove sediments</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Chinese mangrove sediments reveal scale-dependent assembly of fungal communities</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Chinese mangrove sediments reveal scale-dependent assembly of fungal communities. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1146059" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> mangrove, fungal communities, sediment microbiology, biogeography, dispersal limitation, salinity, carbon-to-nitrogen ratio, co-occurrence network, structural equation modeling, Rozellomycota, Chytridiomycota, high-throughput sequencing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">222066</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
