<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>carbon cycle and climate models &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/carbon-cycle-and-climate-models/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 21:38:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Future Emissions and Uncertainty Shape Sea-Level Rise</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/future-emissions-and-uncertainty-shape-sea-level-rise/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Green]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 11:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctic Ice Sheet response to warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon cycle and climate models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change impact on sea levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate modeling and predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate-driven sea-level fluctuations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth system responses to emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emission pathways and sea-level scenarios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future sea-level rise projections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term climate change effects on oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polar ice dynamics and tipping points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uncertainty in sea-level projections]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/future-emissions-and-uncertainty-shape-sea-level-rise/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As the planet grapples with the mounting consequences of climate change, one of the most pressing concerns lies in the future trajectory of sea-level rise and the factors dictating its variability. New research has shed light on the intricate interplay between anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions and the Earth&#8217;s geophysical responses, offering unprecedented clarity into how [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the planet grapples with the mounting consequences of climate change, one of the most pressing concerns lies in the future trajectory of sea-level rise and the factors dictating its variability. New research has shed light on the intricate interplay between anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions and the Earth&#8217;s geophysical responses, offering unprecedented clarity into how these elements jointly influence projections of rising seas. The findings not only deepen our understanding of how future emissions pathways dominate near-term sea-level scenarios but also highlight critical tipping points within polar ice dynamics that could amplify risks over longer timescales.</p>
<p>At the heart of this investigation is the complex relationship between carbon emissions and the climate system&#8217;s resulting temperature changes that ultimately drive sea-level fluctuations. By leveraging an ensemble of meticulously calibrated carbon cycle–climate–sea-level models, researchers have dissected how different emission scenarios propagate through the Earth system to shape sea-level rise trajectories. This modeling approach integrates both human-induced factors — mainly the timing and magnitude of CO2 emissions — and intrinsic Earth system uncertainties, such as the potential thresholds in the Antarctic Ice Sheet’s response to warming temperatures.</p>
<p>One of the most compelling revelations from this work is the primacy of emissions scenarios in dictating sea-level variability in the near future, specifically the mid-21st century window between 2065 and 2075. During this period, the pathway of CO2 emissions — and critically, when society manages to clamp down on these emissions — emerges as the dominant factor driving differences in predicted sea-level rise. This finding underscores the power and immediacy of human agency, where decisions made today about decarbonization timelines will profoundly shape coastal futures.</p>
<p>The study also elevates the role of the Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS), a colossal reservoir of ice whose stability remains a subject of intense scientific scrutiny and uncertainty. Particularly, the researchers highlight that accelerated melting of the AIS could significantly amplify global sea-level sensitivity to both the average temperature over time and the total cumulative warming experienced by the planet. What this means in practice is that if certain critical thresholds within the AIS are surpassed, the rate and magnitude of sea-level rise could escalate beyond what would be expected solely from thermal expansion and melt from other ice masses.</p>
<p>Central to the nuances of this research is the concept of geophysical tipping points—nonlinear thresholds beyond which the ice sheet&#8217;s response to warming accelerates irreversibly. Identifying these tipping points and understanding their probabilities is pivotal for accurately assessing the risk that sea levels will surpass certain critical benchmarks, threatening millions of coastal inhabitants and ecosystems. The study emphasizes that among these uncertainties, pinpointing the AIS tipping threshold and refining estimates of equilibrium climate sensitivity remain paramount.</p>
<p>Equilibrium climate sensitivity, a measure of how much the Earth’s temperature will ultimately rise in response to a doubling of atmospheric CO2, remains one of the most debated parameters in climate science. Its value heavily influences the projected temperature scenarios fed into sea-level rise projections. The range of uncertainty around this sensitivity directly translates to variability in how researchers estimate future sea-level change, reinforcing that a better grasp of climate sensitivity is crucial to reducing predictive ambiguities.</p>
<p>This research conveys a sobering reality: the future trajectory of sea-level rise is not solely a function of emissions quantity but is deeply intertwined with the timing of emission reductions. Delaying significant emission cuts even by a decade or two could lock in a higher range of sea-level rise scenarios by mid-century. This temporal sensitivity elevates the urgency for near-term policy decisions focused on rapid decarbonization efforts.</p>
<p>At the same time, the study cautions against complacency in adaptation strategies. Given the geophysical uncertainties, especially concerning accelerated AIS melting and its nonlinear impact, coastal communities must brace for a wide range of possible futures. Preparing for higher-end sea-level scenarios without certainty about tipping points requires flexible and robust planning that can incorporate new scientific knowledge as it emerges.</p>
<p>Tools that propagate emissions uncertainties through the entire carbon cycle, climate response, and sea-level rise continuum represent a significant advance in climate risk assessment. By constructing an integrated ensemble that encompasses multiple interacting processes, the researchers provide risk managers and policymakers with more holistic and probabilistic projections rather than deterministic predictions. This approach fosters a richer dialogue about managing risk under deep uncertainties.</p>
<p>Negative emissions technologies, which aim to remove CO2 from the atmosphere, were notably excluded from this modeling framework. This decision was intentional, as the absence of negative emissions illustrates the full impact of the emission trajectory itself without technological offsets. While such innovations hold promise, their real-world scalability and effectiveness remain contested, reinforcing that immediate emission reductions remain the surest lever.</p>
<p>In dissecting the relative roles of human and geophysical drivers, the research effectively disentangles a longstanding knot in climate projection science. Variability in emissions dominates near-term uncertainty, but as the century unfolds, Earth system dynamics, particularly ice sheet instability, can take over as the principal determinants of sea-level rise magnitude. This temporal shift in the hierarchy of influences refines how scientists and decision-makers should prioritize actions and research.</p>
<p>Employing advanced carbon-climate-sea-level model chains also permits a clearer identification of key knowledge gaps. For example, the precise mechanisms and temperatures at which AIS melting accelerates are still poorly constrained, highlighting an area where observational and theoretical work is critically needed. Similarly, efforts to hone in on equilibrium climate sensitivity through paleoclimate reconstructions and emerging climate models remain essential to narrowing predictive spreads.</p>
<p>The study’s insights bear significant implications beyond academia. Coastal cities around the world—from megacities to small island nations—stand on the frontline of sea-level rise impact. Understanding when and how much the seas might rise informs not only infrastructure investments and disaster preparedness but also economic policies, insurance schemes, and migration planning. The intertwined uncertainties of emissions and geophysical processes translate directly into real-world stakes for billions of lives.</p>
<p>Ultimately, this new research encapsulates a clarion call for dual-track climate action: accelerating decarbonization at unprecedented speed to minimize near-term uncertainties, while simultaneously advancing geophysical science to anticipate and mitigate longer-term risks. In this dual approach lies the best hope for managing the existential challenges posed by rising seas.</p>
<p>The synthesis of emission pathways and ice dynamics highlights the necessity for international cooperation. Global emissions trajectories hinge on collective political will, while understanding ice sheet behavior benefits from coordinated observational networks and open scientific collaboration. Facing sea-level rise requires an integrated response, weaving together scientific insight, policy action, and community resilience.</p>
<p>Emerging from this body of work is not only a better scientific understanding but a roadmap for balancing mitigation with adaptation. The coastal futures illuminated by these models are not predestined but contingent on humanity’s choices made today and over coming decades. This research thus provides both a warning and a guidepost, underscoring that managing sea-level rise risk demands swift emissions action coupled with vigilant attention to the Earth’s changing geophysical systems.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the interplay of future CO2 emissions pathways and Earth system uncertainties creates a complex but decipherable narrative of sea-level rise risk. The dominant hand of emissions in shaping near-term variability makes rapid decarbonization an imperative, while the lurking potential of Antarctic tipping points urges continued vigilance and enhanced scientific understanding. By navigating this nexus thoughtfully, society can better chart a resilient course amidst the rising tide.</p>
<hr />
<p><strong>Subject of Research</strong>:<br />
The study focuses on the relative contributions of future carbon dioxide emissions trajectories and geophysical uncertainties—particularly Antarctic Ice Sheet tipping points and equilibrium climate sensitivity—to projections of global sea-level rise.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title</strong>:<br />
The interplay of future emissions and geophysical uncertainties for projections of sea-level rise.</p>
<p><strong>Article References</strong>:<br />
Darnell, C., Rennels, L., Errickson, F. et al. The interplay of future emissions and geophysical uncertainties for projections of sea-level rise. Nat. Clim. Chang. (2025). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02457-0">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02457-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits</strong>:<br />
AI Generated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">88703</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diatom surprise could rewrite the global carbon cycle</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/diatom-surprise-could-rewrite-the-global-carbon-cycle/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 18:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Marine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon cycle and climate models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon cycle revision research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon cycling in marine ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide absorption by diatoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide absorption by ocean plankton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change and carbon cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change and ocean carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change and oceanic carbon cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diatom carbon accumulation methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diatom feeding strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diatoms carbon accumulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global carbon cycle revision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of diatoms on global carbon cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine biomass carbon sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine carbon sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine carbon sequestration mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine carbon sequestration processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new findings in marine biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oceanic carbon cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oceanic carbon flux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oceanic diatom feeding behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oceanic single-celled plankton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic carbon consumption by diatoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic carbon consumption by plankton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic carbon uptake in oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photosynthesis and organic carbon feeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photosynthesis in diatoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photosynthesis vs heterotrophy in diatoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plankton biomass formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plankton feeding strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plankton role in carbon cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single-celled plankton biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single-celled plankton carbon uptake]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/diatom-surprise-could-rewrite-the-global-carbon-cycle/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When it comes to diatoms that live in the ocean, new research suggests that photosynthesis is not the only strategy for accumulating carbon. Instead, these single-celled plankton are also building biomass by feeding directly on organic carbon in wide swaths of the ocean. These new findings could lead researchers to reduce their estimate of how [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to diatoms that live in the ocean, new research suggests that photosynthesis is not the only strategy for accumulating carbon. Instead, these single-celled plankton are also building biomass by feeding directly on organic carbon in wide swaths of the ocean. These new findings could lead researchers to reduce their estimate of how much carbon dioxide diatoms pull out of the air via photosynthesis, which in turn, could alter our understanding of the global carbon cycle, which is especially relevant given the changing climate.  </p>
<p></p>
<div class="entry">
<p>When it comes to diatoms that live in the ocean, new research suggests that photosynthesis is not the only strategy for accumulating carbon. Instead, these single-celled plankton are also building biomass by feeding directly on organic carbon in wide swaths of the ocean. These new findings could lead researchers to reduce their estimate of how much carbon dioxide diatoms pull out of the air via photosynthesis, which in turn, could alter our understanding of the global carbon cycle, which is especially relevant given the changing climate.  </p>
<p>This research is led by bioengineers, bioinformatics experts and other genomics researchers at the University of California San Diego. The new findings are published in <em>Science Advances</em> on July 17, 2024. </p>
<p>The team showed that the diatom <em>Cylindrotheca closterium, </em>which is found in oceans around the world, regularly performs a simultaneous mix of both photosynthesis and direct eating of carbon from organic sources such as plankton. In more than 70% of the water samples the researchers analyzed from oceans around the world, the team found signs of simultaneous photosynthesis and direct organic carbon consumption from <em>Cylindrotheca closterium.</em> </p>
<p>The team also showed that this diatom species can grow much faster when consuming organic carbon in addition to photosynthesis.  </p>
<p>Furthermore, the new research hints at the tantalizing possibility that specific species of bacteria are feeding organic carbon directly to a large percentage of these diatoms living all across the global ocean.</p>
<p>This work is based on a genome-scale metabolic modeling approach that the team used to unravel the metabolism of the diatom <em>Cylindrotheca closterium</em>. The researchers constrained their genome-scale metabolic model with global gene expression data obtained from the TARA ocean expedition. The researchers believe this is the first time genome-scale models have been used at a global scale. </p>
<p>The team’s new metabolic modeling data support recent lab experiments suggesting that some diatoms may rely on strategies other than photosynthesis to intake the carbon they need to survive, thrive and build biomass.</p>
<p>The UC San Diego led team is in the process of expanding the scope of the project to determine how widespread this non-photosynthetic activity is among other diatom species.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Are ocean bacteria feeding diatoms?</strong></p>
<p>When the team looked at the physical and chemical parameters measured in their ocean water samples – including temperature, pH, salinity, light, nitrogen and carbon availability – they did not find any correlation between those parameters and a tendency by the diatoms to steer away from photosynthesis-only strategies. </p>
<p>However, the team found a clear signal when exploring specific bacterial populations co-existing with the diatom <em>Cylindrotheca closterium</em> in the ocean water samples. This finding hints at bacteria-diatom interactions that drive the simultaneous mix of photosynthesis and direct consumption of organic carbon – a phenomenon known as “mixotrophy.” </p>
<p>The team believes that specific bacteria may be feeding the diatoms directly, helping these diatoms to be one of the most successful and important microbes on the planet, in terms of oxygen production, carbon sequestration, and as a foundation of food webs that support nearly all life in the ocean. </p>
<p>“Diatoms are major contributors to marine food chains and key drivers of the global carbon cycle. Previously, we have estimated all carbon cycling models on the assumption that the only role that diatoms play is in carbon dioxide fixation. Our findings demonstrate that this is not the case, but that diatoms simultaneously also eat organic carbon. In other words, we have shown that diatoms do not rely exclusively on carbon dioxide fixation for their growth and biomass production. We believe these results will have major implications for our understanding of global carbon cycling,” said UC San Diego Professor <u>Karsten Zengler</u>, professor in the Departments of Pediatrics and Bioengineering and researcher in the Center for Microbiome Innovation at the Jacobs School of Engineering.</p>
<p>“While there have been curious observations in the laboratory regarding diatoms deviating from photosynthesis, it has been impossible to test what kind of metabolism these diatoms perform in the ocean – until now. This is because there are many, many genes involved in this process, and it&#8217;s very difficult to delineate what process is active from gene expression data alone. Our approach gets around this challenge.”</p>
<p>The research team hopes this work will stimulate interest in taking a much closer look at our understanding of the global carbon cycle, taking into consideration this new broader understanding of how ocean diatoms get their carbon. </p>
<p>What the bacteria feeding the diatoms may be getting out of the relationship is another question for further research. </p>
<p>The paper &#8220;<em>Mixotrophic growth of a ubiquitous marine diatom</em>&#8221; by Kumar <em>et al</em> appears in <em>Science Advances</em>. </p>
<p>Complete author and funding information are listed in the paper. </p>
<p>The corresponding author is UC San Diego Professor Karsten Zengler. He holds faculty appointments in the Department of Pediatrics at the UC San Diego School of Medicine; and the Shu Chien-Gene Lay Department of Bioengineering at the UC San Diego Jacobs School of Engineering. He is a faculty member of the Center for Microbiome Innovation at the UC San Diego Jacobs School of Engineering and Affiliate Faculty in the Program in Materials Science and Engineering. </p>
<p> </p>
<hr class="hidden-xs hidden-sm">
<hr class="major visible-sm">
<div class="featured_image">
<div class="details">
<div class="well">
<h4>Journal</h4>
<p>                            Science Advances
                        </p></div>
<div class="well">
<h4>Method of Research</h4>
<p>                            Data/statistical analysis
                        </p></div>
<div class="well">
<h4>Subject of Research</h4>
<p>                            Animals
                        </p></div>
<div class="well">
<h4>Article Title</h4>
<p>                            Mixotrophic growth of a ubiquitous marine diatom
                        </p></div>
<div class="well">
<h4>Article Publication Date</h4>
<p>                            17-Jul-2024
                        </p></div>
<div class="well">
<h4>COI Statement</h4>
<p>                            The authors declare no competing interests.
                        </p></div></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14627</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
