<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>carbon/carbon composites &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/carbon-carbon-composites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 06:41:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>High-Entropy Alloy Filler Tames Brittle Layers in Carbon-Carbon Brazed Joints</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/high-entropy-alloy-filler-tames-brittle-layers-in-carbon-carbon-brazed-joints/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 06:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced brazing techniques for Cf/C composites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerospace materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brazing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brittle interfacial phase suppression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon-carbon composite metal joining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon/carbon composites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[composite-metal interface chemistry control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[durability of rocket nozzle repairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finite element simulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high entropy alloy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High-entropy alloy brazing filler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-entropy alloys in aerospace manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-temperature aerospace component assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid materials for high-temperature applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative brazing materials for extreme environments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interfacial reactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microstructure engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitigation of joint failure in thermal protection systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[niobium interlayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refractory metals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residual stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shear strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stress reduction in composite-metal joints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vacuum brazing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=310184</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Chinese researchers used a face-centered cubic FeCoNiAlCuTi high-entropy alloy filler to suppress continuous brittle carbide layers in carbon-carbon composite brazed joints, cutting peak stress from 371 to 274 MPa and achieving a shear strength of 40.7 MPa.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joining carbon fiber reinforced carbon matrix composites to metals has long been one of the most stubborn problems in high-temperature aerospace manufacturing. These composites, known as Cf/C, can survive conditions that would melt or creep most conventional alloys, which makes them attractive for rocket nozzles, thermal protection panels, and other components that face extreme heat. The trouble is that a Cf/C component rarely works alone; it must be bolted, welded, or brazed to metallic structures, and every one of those connections becomes a potential point of failure. A team of Chinese researchers now reports a new brazing strategy based on a high-entropy alloy filler metal that suppresses the brittle interfacial phases responsible for many of these failures, while also cutting joint stress significantly. Their work was published in the journal Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials.</p>
<p>The core problem lies in chemistry. Traditional active brazing fillers contain elements such as titanium or chromium that react with carbon to form carbides, which is precisely what allows the molten filler to wet the composite surface in the first place. Wetting requires some reaction at the interface. But when that reaction runs out of control, it produces a continuous layer of brittle carbide phases along the entire contact area. Such a layer acts like a built-in crack: it has almost no tolerance for the shear and tensile loads that a real joint experiences, and the mismatch in thermal expansion between ceramic-like composites and metals adds large residual stresses during cooling after brazing. The result is joints that may look perfect under the microscope yet fail at low loads in service.</p>
<p>Researchers led by Jinzheng Li, Pengcheng Wang, Haiyan Chen, and Wenya Li at Northwestern Polytechnical University, together with collaborators from Xi&#8217;an Space Engine Company, the Harbin Institute of Technology, and the Zhengzhou Research Institute of Mechanical Engineering, attacked the problem with an unusual choice of filler: a face-centered cubic FeCoNiAlCuTi high-entropy alloy. High-entropy alloys, or HEAs, are composed of several principal elements mixed in near-equal proportions, and their defining feature is a very high configurational entropy of mixing. In a conventional alloy, one dominant element dictates the crystal structure and behavior; in a high-entropy alloy, the chaotic atomic-level mixing itself stabilizes a single solid-solution phase and complicates the formation of ordered, brittle intermetallic compounds.</p>
<p>That disorder proved to be the key. When the team used the FCC FeCoNiAlCuTi alloy to braze Cf/C composites to a refractory metal interlayer, the same high mixing entropy that stabilizes the bulk filler also hampered the continuous, cooperative reactions that normally produce an unbroken brittle layer on the composite side. Instead of growing as a continuous film, the interfacial phases were fragmented and dispersed. The resulting joint did not contain a continuous brittle layer at the Cf/C interface at all, which is exactly the failure-prone feature the researchers set out to eliminate. Without that weak seam running across the joint, cracks lose the easy path they would otherwise follow.</p>
<p>The microstructure that emerged is strikingly hierarchical. The brazed seam develops as a multi-layered structure with three principal regions: a reaction zone where the filler meets the Cf/C composite, a band of niobium solid solution, and a eutectic zone within the seam. Crucially, the interface with the composite takes on a gully-shaped, interlocking geometry, anchored by a ductile FeCoNiAl-rich phase rather than by a brittle carbide film. This mechanical interlocking does more than improve adhesion. Because the ductile FCC phase bridges the interface, it redirects a portion of the load away from the fragile composite surface and into the tougher interior of the joint, where the FCC structure can deform plastically and absorb energy instead of fracturing.</p>
<p>The mechanical consequences were quantified with finite element simulations. When the team modeled the stress state of a conventionally brazed joint, the peak Mises stress, a standard measure of the combined stresses that drive yielding and fracture, reached 371 megapascals. With the hierarchical microstructure engineered by the high-entropy filler, that peak dropped to 274 megapascals, a reduction of roughly a quarter. Lower peak stress means less driving force for crack initiation at the interface and a longer fatigue life in service. It also means the joint tolerates the thermal expansion mismatch between composite and metal far more gracefully, since stress is spread through the ductile phase rather than concentrated against a brittle layer.</p>
<p>The experimental performance matched the modeling. Under optimized brazing conditions of 1340 degrees Celsius held for 20 minutes, the joints achieved a shear strength of 40.7 megapascals. For carbon-carbon composite joints, where brittle interfacial layers and residual stresses have historically limited reliability, that figure represents a meaningful benchmark. The brazing window itself is technologically significant: vacuum brazing at around 1340 degrees Celsius is compatible with existing industrial equipment used for joining refractory metals and high-temperature assemblies, so the process does not demand exotic infrastructure to be adopted.</p>
<p>The study also highlights how a refractory metal participates in the design. Niobium, used as an interlayer material in the joint, dissolves into the seam to form a banded solid-solution zone. This band serves as a compliant, ductile buffer between the composite and the eutectic regions of the filler, further moderating the transfer of stress. Refractory metals are natural partners for carbon-carbon composites in aerospace systems because they retain strength at high temperature, but they bring their own joining difficulties. By integrating the niobium band into a deliberately layered seam architecture, the researchers turned what is often a liability into an engineered component of the joint&#8217;s mechanics.</p>
<p>What makes the approach conceptually interesting beyond this specific material pair is the use of thermodynamics as a design tool. Rather than adding inhibitors or controlling reaction time more tightly, the team exploited the intrinsic high mixing entropy of a multi-principal-element alloy to make brittle phase formation simply less favorable. The same principle could be transferable to other difficult joining problems, for example between silicon carbide composites and superalloys, or titanium aluminides and steels, wherever continuous brittle reaction layers undermine joint strength. High-entropy fillers remain a young field, and questions about cost, oxidation behavior, and long-term performance at sustained high temperature will need answers before flight-critical adoption, but the fundamental demonstration is clear.</p>
<p>The work, which was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and several provincial and state key laboratory programs, arrives at a moment when aerospace designers are pushing carbon-carbon composites from niche thermal-protection roles toward broader structural use. Every step in that direction multiplies the number of composite-to-metal joints required, and each of those joints is only as reliable as its weakest interfacial layer. By showing that hierarchical microstructure engineering with an FeCoNiAlCuTi high-entropy filler can eliminate the continuous brittle layer, redistribute stress into ductile phases, and deliver a shear strength of more than 40 megapascals, the Northwestern Polytechnical University-led team has provided a concrete recipe for stronger, more dependable bonds. The research was published as an open-access article, making the detailed microstructural analysis available to joining engineers worldwide who are racing to make extreme-temperature composite hardware a routine reality.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> High-entropy alloy brazing of carbon fiber reinforced carbon composites to suppress brittle interfacial layers</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Brittle interfacial layer suppression in Cf/C brazed joints with refractory metal via hierarchical microstructure engineering</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Li, J., Wang, P., Chi, J., Shao, H., Pan, Z., Wang, J., Long, W., Song, X., Chen, H., &amp; Li, W. (2026). Brittle interfacial layer suppression in Cf/C brazed joints with refractory metal via hierarchical microstructure engineering. <em>Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-026-02101-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-026-02101-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-026-02101-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s42114-026-02101-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> carbon-carbon composites, high-entropy alloy, brazing, vacuum brazing, interfacial reactions, refractory metals, niobium interlayer, residual stress, shear strength, microstructure engineering, aerospace materials, finite element simulation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">310184</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon Materials Outperform Metals in the Race to Cool Space Telescopes</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/carbon-materials-outperform-metals-in-the-race-to-cool-space-telescopes/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant Pearson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 07:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced materials for space telescope cooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon materials for space applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon nanotubes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon-based heat dissipation in space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon-based materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon/carbon composites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryogenic thermal straps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[durability of space telescope materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineering challenges in space thermal management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphite heat spreaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-thermal-conductivity carbon composites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[materials outperforming metals in space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phonon conduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space optical remote sensors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space telescope thermal management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spacecraft thermal control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spacecraft thermal control innovations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temperature fluctuation impact on space instruments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal conductivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal expansion mismatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal regulation in satellite optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal stability of optical components]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=237288</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new review shows that graphene, carbon nanotubes, and carbon composites can slash weight and dramatically outperform metals in the thermal management of space optical remote sensors.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Space is a place of brutal thermal extremes. A satellite optical remote sensor circling the Earth can swing from searing sunlight to the deep cold of shadow in a matter of minutes, and every one of those transitions threatens the delicate alignment of mirrors, lenses, and focal-plane arrays that make precision imaging possible. When temperatures fluctuate, optical components deform thermally, dark current in the focal plane rises, and in the worst cases the entire instrument fails. For decades, engineers have relied on aluminum, copper, and other metals to shuttle heat away from sensitive components, but as imaging accuracy demands and on-orbit service lifetimes continue to climb, those traditional materials are running out of headroom. A new systematic review published in Space: Science &amp; Technology, led by Yu Shanmeng of the Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, argues that carbon-based high-thermal-conductivity materials are now ready to break that bottleneck, provided the community can translate laboratory promise into engineering practice.</p>
<p>The appeal of carbon is easy to state in numbers. According to the review, the thermal conductivity of carbon-based materials can reach several to more than ten times that of copper, while their density is only about two-thirds that of aluminum. That combination of ultra-high heat transport and low mass is exactly what spacecraft designers crave, because every kilogram launched is a kilogram that cannot be spent on payload. Carbon also brings a low coefficient of thermal expansion and inherent radiation resistance, making it a research hotspot in space thermal management. The physics behind this performance lies in phonons, the quantized lattice vibrations that dominate heat conduction in carbon materials. Thermal conductivity is governed primarily by microstructure, including grain size, impurities, and defects, as well as by the phonon mean free path, which means that how a carbon material is fabricated matters as much as what it is made of.</p>
<p>The review organizes the carbon family by dimensionality, and the numbers across that spectrum are striking. Zero-dimensional fullerenes, one-dimensional carbon nanotubes and carbon fibers, two-dimensional graphene, and three-dimensional diamond, graphite, and carbon foam structures each occupy a distinct niche. Monolayer graphene has a theoretical thermal conductivity of 5000 watts per meter-kelvin, carbon nanotubes reach 3500 watts per meter-kelvin at room temperature, and the in-plane thermal conductivity of three-dimensional carbon/carbon composites can exceed 400 watts per meter-kelvin. Yet none of these microscopic structures can do useful work on their own. They must first be assembled into macroscopic all-carbon forms such as graphite paper, graphite blocks, carbon fiber blocks, and carbon foams before they can be integrated into real thermal management devices, a step that introduces its own losses and engineering complications.</p>
<p>Where do these materials actually earn their keep in orbit? The review catalogs three broad arenas: heat dissipation for electronic devices, flexible thermal conduction, and structural temperature homogenization. In the first category, high-thermal-conductivity graphite heat spreaders with an in-plane conductivity of 650 watts per meter-kelvin and a density of just 2.1 grams per cubic centimeter have been applied to the thermal management of FPGA and DDR memory chips. By machining bosses on the back side of the graphite plate to guarantee tight contact with the chips, engineers effectively solved the heat dissipation challenge posed by high-heat-flux devices, meeting requirements that conventional metal spreaders struggled to satisfy.</p>
<p>Phase-change energy storage devices represent a second, subtler application. Here, high-thermal-conductivity carbon foam serves as a skeleton that encapsulates phase-change materials, which absorb heat as they melt and release it as they solidify. The carbon foam&#8217;s role is to spread heat uniformly through the phase-change medium, and the payoff is substantial: the peak temperature of the unit drops by approximately 10 degrees Celsius, thermal control compensation power consumption falls by 30 percent, and the entire satellite sheds more than a kilogram of mass. For a mission where mass margins are measured in grams, a single-kilogram saving on a thermal subsystem is the kind of result that reshapes payload budgets.</p>
<p>Flexible thermal conduction is the third arena, and it is where carbon materials deliver perhaps their most dramatic comparative numbers. Cryogenic optical systems require thermal straps that can link moving or thermally isolated components without transmitting vibration or stress, and flexible graphite films excel in this role. A thermal strap composed of 60 layers of graphite film exhibits an equivalent thermal resistance of only 48 percent of a copper thermal cable of the same dimensions, while weighing a mere 23 percent as much. Deployed in a cryogenic optical system, such a strap successfully maintained lens temperature within stringent limits. Carbon fiber bundle cryogenic thermal straps have already flown in multiple space programs, including NASA&#8217;s ORION and JAXA&#8217;s ASTRO-H, achieving a thermal conductance of 0.7 watts per kelvin at 100 kelvin, proof that the technology is not merely a laboratory curiosity.</p>
<p>Structural temperature homogenization rounds out the application portfolio. When carbon/carbon composite materials were attached to the surface of a star tracker bracket, the axial temperature difference fell from 28 degrees Celsius to 5 degrees Celsius, effectively eliminating a large-temperature-differential problem that would otherwise distort pointing accuracy. High-thermal-conductivity graphite radiator panels built as a composite of graphite laminates and aluminum honeycomb achieve a mass of only about one-third that of conventional aluminum panels while significantly improving radiation efficiency. And when flexible graphite films were introduced into multi-layer insulation assemblies, the temperature fluctuation inside a camera narrowed from plus or minus 2.8 degrees Celsius to plus or minus 0.9 degrees Celsius, a threefold improvement in thermal stability that translates directly into sharper, more consistent imagery.</p>
<p>None of this means carbon is a drop-in replacement for metal, and the review is candid about the obstacles. Chemical vapor deposition of large-area, high-quality graphene remains costly and difficult to control for uniformity. Graphite heat spreaders suffer from low compressive strength and are susceptible to surface contamination, while interfacial bonding and dispersion uniformity directly determine the performance of composites. Perhaps the thorniest issue is thermal expansion mismatch: carbon/carbon composites expand at roughly 1 times 10 to the minus 6 per kelvin, compared with approximately 23 times 10 to the minus 6 per kelvin for aluminum alloys. That twentyfold gap induces thermal stresses at bonded interfaces, which can lead to delamination or bubble formation, forcing designers to insert intermediate layers such as flexible silicone adhesives to accommodate the strain.</p>
<p>Long-term survival in the space environment poses its own questions. Extreme temperature cycling, hard vacuum, and high-energy radiation may cause oxidation or structural degradation of graphene and carbon nanotubes over a mission&#8217;s lifetime. High-specific-surface-area carbon materials can also outgas in vacuum, and those released molecules risk condensing on and contaminating precisely the optical surfaces the thermal system is meant to protect. These are not disqualifying problems, but they demand rigorous qualification testing and careful material selection before carbon components can be trusted on multi-year missions, particularly for sensors whose science return depends on sub-degree thermal stability.</p>
<p>The path forward, the authors argue, lies in deepening theoretical research on multiscale thermal conduction mechanisms, developing multifunctional composites that integrate thermal conduction, lightweighting, and structural reinforcement in a single material, and exploring metastructured carbon materials whose performance breakthroughs come from precise structural and functional tailoring rather than raw conductivity alone. If those efforts succeed, the review&#8217;s systematic framework, spanning phonon theory, fabrication processes, and application cases from chip cooling to radiator panels, could serve as the reference standard for selecting and engineering carbon-based thermal solutions. For the next generation of space optical remote sensors, the difference between a blurry image and a discovery may well come down to how cleverly engineers weave graphene, carbon nanotubes, and carbon composites into the machine.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Carbon-based high-thermal-conductivity materials for thermal management in space optical remote sensors</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Carbon-based high-thermal-conductivity materials for thermal management in space optical sensors</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Carbon-based high-thermal-conductivity materials for thermal management in space optical sensors. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1144795" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> carbon-based materials, graphene, carbon nanotubes, thermal management, space optical remote sensors, thermal conductivity, carbon/carbon composites, graphite heat spreaders, cryogenic thermal straps, spacecraft thermal control, phonon conduction, thermal expansion mismatch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">237288</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
