<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>carbon and nitrogen cycling &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/carbon-and-nitrogen-cycling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 22:02:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Wastewater Chemical Stress Pushes River Microbes to Emit More Greenhouse Gases</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/wastewater-chemical-stress-pushes-river-microbes-to-emit-more-greenhouse-gases/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan Morrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 22:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Marine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon and nitrogen cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical reprogramming of microbial communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change and urban waterways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cytotoxicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defence–energy trade-off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emerging contaminants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental toxicology of wastewater effluents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas emissions from waterways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of emerging contaminants on river ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanisms of greenhouse gas emission in polluted rivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial metabolism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial response to chemical stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-omics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-omics analysis of river microbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxidative stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollutants inducing methane and nitrous oxide production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[river microbial metabolism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[river microbiome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban rivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater chemical pollutants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater treatment plant effluent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater treatment plant pollution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=208123</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New research shows that mixtures of emerging contaminants in treated wastewater trigger a microbial defence–energy trade-off in receiving rivers that substantially increases greenhouse gas production.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rivers that receive treated wastewater have long been known as hotspots for greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide. What has remained murky is exactly why. A new study published in Nature Water offers a striking answer: the very chemicals that slip through treatment plants appear to rewire the metabolism of river microbes in a way that favours gas production. The research, led by Rui-Feng Yan and Ai-Jie Wang of the Harbin Institute of Technology together with colleagues at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, tracked a wastewater treatment plant and its receiving river from end to end, combining an unusually broad chemical survey with toxicity testing, gas measurements, multi-omics analysis and controlled laboratory experiments. The result is one of the most complete mechanistic pictures to date of how pollutant mixtures translate into climate-relevant emissions in urban waterways.</p>
<p>The team sampled along a continuum running from the treatment plant itself into the river that receives its effluent. They measured 159 emerging contaminants, a category that includes pharmaceuticals, personal care products, endocrine disruptors, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, ultraviolet filters, organophosphate esters and phthalate esters. These compounds are called emerging not because they are new to the environment but because their ecological consequences are only now coming into focus. Even though the treatment plant removed 82.21 percent of the contaminants it received, the effluent still raised downstream concentrations by 53.21 percent compared with upstream water. Cytotoxicity, measured with a luminescent bacterial bioassay, climbed by 44.15 percent, and the dissolved greenhouse gas burden, expressed as carbon dioxide equivalents, increased by 11.31 percent downstream of the discharge point.</p>
<p>Those field numbers alone would be noteworthy, but the real surprise lay in the microbial data. Using metagenomic and metatranscriptomic profiling across the sampling sites, the researchers found that genes governing microbial defence functions, including efflux pumps that expel toxic compounds, biofilm formation that shields cells from stress, and cytochrome P450 detoxification enzymes that chemically neutralize xenobiotics, had declined by 52.34 to 57.98 percent downstream. At the same time, genes linked to greenhouse gas production through carbon and nitrogen transformations were between 1.94 and 33.67 times more abundant than at upstream sites. The pattern exceeded what simple dilution or mixing of effluent with river water could explain, pointing to an active biological reorganization rather than a passive change in community composition.</p>
<p>To test whether the contaminants themselves were driving this shift, the team built semi-continuous microcosms in the laboratory, comparing microbial communities exposed to EC-rich effluent, upstream river water, and effluent from which the contaminants had been depleted. The comparison proved decisive. Only the microcosms receiving contaminant-rich effluent showed the characteristic signature observed in the river: suppression of defence functions alongside activation of respiration, fermentation, and carbon and nitrogen transformation pathways. When the contaminants were stripped out, the metabolic shift largely disappeared. This controlled evidence strengthens the causal chain from chemical exposure to metabolic rewiring to greenhouse gas production, a chain that field observations alone could only suggest.</p>
<p>The biochemical details reveal a story of stress and adaptation that will feel familiar to anyone who has studied cellular stress responses. Enzyme and metabolite analyses showed that contaminant exposure induced oxidative stress and a transient depletion of cellular energy. In the early phase of exposure, the microbes&#8217; energy currency, adenosine triphosphate, dropped as cells diverted resources away from growth and maintenance. But the communities then recovered: acetyl-CoA content rebounded, citrate synthase activity, a key gatekeeper of the tricarboxylic acid cycle, climbed back, and ATP availability was restored. The researchers interpret this recovery as evidence of a fundamental shift in microbial strategy, from investing in defence against chemical attack to prioritizing energy maintenance and core metabolism.</p>
<p>This defence–energy trade-off is the conceptual heart of the paper. Microbes facing toxic stress face a budgeting problem: the ATP and enzymatic machinery spent on efflux pumps, biofilm matrices and detoxification enzymes cannot simultaneously power other functions. When long-term exposure makes sustained defence too costly, communities appear to abandon that investment and fall back on energy-generating metabolism, including respiration and fermentation, which happen to release carbon dioxide, and nitrogen transformation pathways, which can release nitrous oxide. The genes for these gas-producing pathways became markedly more abundant downstream, and the microcosm experiments showed the same activation under controlled conditions. In effect, chemical stress pushes microbial communities into a metabolic mode that is intrinsically gassier.</p>
<p>The findings arrive at a moment of growing concern about inland waters as emission sources. Previous work has established that urban rivers are hotspots of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide fluxes, and that global riverine methane emissions are substantial. Earlier studies had also hinted that individual pollutants, such as the fungicide chlorothalonil or the antibiotic ciprofloxacin, can alter denitrification and nitrous oxide production in sediments and soils. What distinguishes the new study is its treatment of contaminants as mixtures rather than single compounds, its use of cytotoxicity as an integrating measure of mixture effects, and its combination of field continuum sampling with experiments that isolate cause from correlation. The risk prioritization analysis embedded in the work also identified key compounds that contribute disproportionately to both water quality health risks and greenhouse effect risks.</p>
<p>The implications for wastewater management are uncomfortable but clear. Conventional treatment plants are designed to remove bulk organic matter, nutrients and pathogens, and many do so reasonably well, as the 82 percent contaminant removal in this study shows. Yet the residual mixture that passes through is biologically potent enough to reshape downstream microbial ecology and measurably increase the climate footprint of the receiving water. Advanced treatment options, including ozonation and activated carbon filtration, have been evaluated at European scale for micropollutant removal, and the new results suggest that their benefits may extend beyond ecotoxicity reduction to climate mitigation. If contaminant stress is what tips microbial communities toward gas production, then removing that stress could keep the defence functions intact and the emissions lower.</p>
<p>There are also broader ecological questions raised by the trade-off framework. Microbial ecologists have long recognized that stress responses divert resources from growth and ecosystem functions, and trait-based frameworks in soil science have explored similar logic for carbon cycling. Extending that framework to riverine greenhouse gas production links two research communities that have largely worked in parallel: those studying pollutant effects on microbial communities and those quantifying inland water emissions. The multi-omics approach used here, spanning genes, transcripts, enzymes and metabolites, offers a template for testing whether similar trade-offs operate in other stressed environments, from agricultural soils exposed to pesticides to sediments contaminated with microplastics, which have also been reported to amplify greenhouse gas emissions from freshwater systems.</p>
<p>For now, the study stands as a warning that the climate cost of wastewater is not fully captured by what leaves the pipe. The effluent that meets regulatory targets can still carry a chemical load sufficient to reprogramme the microbial metabolism of an entire river reach, suppressing the communities&#8217; defensive capabilities and channelling their energy budgets into pathways that emit greenhouse gases. As monitoring programs worldwide begin to grapple with hundreds of unregulated contaminants, the message from this river continuum is that the atmosphere may be keeping score even when the water quality ledger looks clean. Understanding and managing the defence–energy trade-off in receiving waters may therefore become an essential piece of both pollution control and climate policy in the decades ahead.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> How emerging contaminant mixtures in wastewater effluent drive greenhouse gas production in receiving rivers through a microbial defence–energy trade-off.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Emerging contaminant stress promotes greenhouse gas production through microbial defence–energy trade-off in receiving rivers</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Yan, R.-F., Han, J.-L., Han, Y.-N., Liang, B., Gao, S.-H., Sun, Y.-L., &amp; Wang, A.-J. (2026). Emerging contaminant stress promotes greenhouse gas production through microbial defence–energy trade-off in receiving rivers. <em>Nature Water</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-026-00704-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-026-00704-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-026-00704-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s44221-026-00704-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> emerging contaminants, wastewater treatment plant effluent, greenhouse gases, river microbiome, microbial metabolism, defence–energy trade-off, multi-omics, cytotoxicity, carbon and nitrogen cycling, oxidative stress, Nature Water, urban rivers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">208123</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How soil microbes shift nutrient limits and carbon use as forests recover</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/how-soil-microbes-shift-nutrient-limits-and-carbon-use-as-forests-recover/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 04:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon and nitrogen cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of disturbance on soil microbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest recovery and succession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest succession and microbial activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of soil microbes on global carbon cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact on global carbon sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial carbon metabolism in forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial community changes during forest regeneration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial contribution to nutrient cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial nutrient dynamics during forest recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial responses to forest disturbance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient constraints in recovering forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient limitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphorus limitation in soil microbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphorus scarcity in soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secondary forest ecosystem dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secondary forest recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil biochemistry in temperate forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbes and carbon sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbial communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbial metabolism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbial nutrient cycling]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/how-soil-microbes-shift-nutrient-limits-and-carbon-use-as-forests-recover/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Beneath the quiet canopy of cold-temperate poplar-birch forests in northern China, an invisible metabolic drama is unfolding. As secondary forests recover from disturbance and mature over decades, the microbial communities in the soil beneath them are renegotiating their relationship with carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus—and the outcome of that negotiation may shape how much carbon these [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beneath the quiet canopy of cold-temperate poplar-birch forests in northern China, an invisible metabolic drama is unfolding. As secondary forests recover from disturbance and mature over decades, the microbial communities in the soil beneath them are renegotiating their relationship with carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus—and the outcome of that negotiation may shape how much carbon these ecosystems can lock away. A new study published in the journal Plant and Soil by researchers at Hebei Agricultural University and their collaborators has charted this hidden process in remarkable detail, revealing that soil microbes face persistent phosphorus scarcity even as their carbon constraints ease with forest succession, and that the intensity of microbial carbon metabolism steadily climbs as the forest ages.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Jiahe Zhou, with Yue Pang and Jing Tian serving as corresponding authors, set out to answer a deceptively simple question: how do microbial nutrient limitation and carbon metabolism change—and interact—during the progression of artificially promoted forest succession? Secondary forests that regrow after logging or other disturbances dominate landscapes worldwide, and understanding their below-ground biochemistry is critical for predicting their contribution to the global carbon cycle. Yet the coupling between what microbes find limiting in their diet and how fast they burn through soil organic carbon has remained poorly resolved, particularly in cold-temperate systems where decomposition is slow and growing seasons are short.</p>
<p>To untangle this, the researchers employed a space-for-time substitution approach, sampling soils across four distinct successional stages of poplar-birch secondary forests. This method assumes that sites of different ages represent a temporal sequence, allowing scientists to compress decades of ecological change into a single field campaign. At each stage, the team measured a comprehensive suite of soil physical and chemical properties, alongside the activities of extracellular enzymes—proteins secreted by microbes into the soil to break down complex organic molecules that are otherwise too large to cross cell membranes. Because microbes must invest resources to produce these enzymes, the relative balance of enzyme activities serves as a sensitive indicator of what the microbial community is most hungry for.</p>
<p>The analytical framework at the heart of the study is ecoenzymatic stoichiometry, a technique that compares the ratios of carbon-acquiring, nitrogen-acquiring, and phosphorus-acquiring enzymes against the presumed nutritional needs of microbial biomass. Deviations from theoretical optimum ratios reveal whether microbes are energy-starved, nitrogen-limited, or phosphorus-limited. The researchers complemented this with vector analysis, which uses the length and angle of a stoichiometric vector to quantify the degree of nutrient limitation, and with two key parameters of microbial carbon metabolism: carbon use efficiency, or CUE, which describes the fraction of metabolized carbon that microbes convert into their own biomass rather than releasing as carbon dioxide, and the microbial organic carbon decomposition rate, abbreviated M<sub>C</sub>, which measures how quickly soil organic carbon is being broken down.</p>
<p>The results paint a vivid picture of an ecosystem in transition. Activities of both carbon-acquiring and nitrogen-acquiring enzymes increased steadily with succession, signaling rising microbial demand for energy and nitrogen as the developing forest pumped more organic matter into the soil. Microbial carbon limitation followed a distinctive trajectory: it peaked at the middle stage of succession before declining, suggesting that early-to-mid successional soils offer abundant but nutritionally imbalanced carbon that forces microbes to work hard to acquire it, while later stages provide a more accessible carbon supply. Phosphorus limitation, by contrast, told a different story altogether—it persisted across all four successional stages, never relenting as the forest matured.</p>
<p>This persistent phosphorus hunger is ecologically significant. Phosphorus is derived ultimately from weathering rock, and as soils age, available forms of the element become increasingly locked in organic compounds or bound to minerals. The finding aligns with a growing body of global evidence that microbial phosphorus limitation is widespread in forest ecosystems, particularly in older, more weathered soils. For the poplar-birch forests of the study, it means that no matter how much carbon the maturing forest delivers to the soil, the microbial community remains constrained by a nutrient that cannot simply be manufactured from air.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most striking results concern the twin metrics of carbon metabolism. Carbon use efficiency reached its lowest point at the mid-successional stage, exactly when carbon limitation peaked—a logical pairing, since microbes struggling to acquire carbon have fewer resources to spare for growth and must dissipate more of what they metabolize as heat and carbon dioxide. Meanwhile, the microbial organic carbon decomposition rate increased continuously throughout succession, reaching 0.24 percent per day at the late stage. Intriguingly, CUE and the decomposition rate showed a positive relationship with each other, a coupling that challenges any simplistic assumption that faster decomposition necessarily means less efficient carbon use. Instead, the two processes appear to rise and fall together in a coordinated fashion across successional time.</p>
<p>The study&#8217;s correlation analysis deepens this picture. Carbon limitation was associated with reduced carbon use efficiency, meaning that when microbes faced energy scarcity, they converted less of their carbon intake into biomass. Persistent phosphorus limitation, on the other hand, was associated with increased decomposition rates—a counterintuitive link that the authors interpret as evidence that nutrient stress drives microbes to mine soil organic matter more aggressively, releasing enzymes to extract the scarce phosphorus they need and, in the process, decomposing carbon that might otherwise have remained stored. When microbes are phosphorus-starved, they essentially ramp up their digestive machinery, with carbon oxidation as an unavoidable by-product.</p>
<p>The environmental drivers behind these two facets of microbial physiology turned out to be distinct. Carbon use efficiency was significantly negatively related to dissolved organic carbon, suggesting that abundant labile carbon in solution does not translate into efficient microbial growth—possibly because it reflects an imbalance between carbon supply and nutrient availability. The decomposition rate, in contrast, was primarily governed by soil water content and nitrogen availability, two factors that control both the physical accessibility of organic matter and the capacity of microbes to build the enzymes needed to degrade it. In other words, what limits how efficiently microbes use carbon is not the same as what controls how fast they decompose it—a decoupling of regulation despite a coupling of patterns.</p>
<p>Taken together, these findings carry weighty implications for carbon sequestration management in cold-temperate forests. As secondary forests succeed, their soils host microbial communities that are metabolically intensifying—processing more carbon per unit time—while remaining shackled by phosphorus scarcity. If phosphorus availability moderates the pace of decomposition, then management strategies that alleviate microbial phosphorus stress might paradoxically accelerate carbon loss, whereas strategies that maintain nitrogen supply and soil moisture regimes could influence decomposition in the opposite direction. The authors suggest that their results advance mechanistic understanding of soil carbon dynamics and offer insights for managing soil carbon storage in these ecosystems, which cover vast areas of northeastern China and comparable cold-temperate zones globally.</p>
<p>The work also contributes to a lively scientific debate about the role of microbial physiology in Earth&#8217;s carbon cycle. Recent global modeling studies have argued that microbial carbon use efficiency is a dominant control on global soil carbon storage, potentially rivaling the influence of climate and carbon inputs. By demonstrating that CUE and decomposition rates are shaped by different environmental levers yet move in concert during succession, the new study adds nuance to these models: future predictions may need to represent nutrient limitation and carbon metabolism as linked but separately regulated processes rather than a single dial. For a forest regrowing after disturbance, the microbial underworld is not merely a passive decomposer community—it is an active, nutrient-starved, metabolically intensifying engine whose appetites will help determine whether the carbon that forests capture from the atmosphere ends up locked in soil or returned to the sky.</p>
<p>As forests worldwide continue to recover from centuries of logging and land-use change, studies like this one remind us that the fate of the carbon cycle is negotiated in the dark, by organisms too small to see, one enzyme at a time.</p>
<div class="scienmag-article-metadata"><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Soil microbial nutrient limitation and carbon metabolism during succession stages of poplar-birch secondary forests</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Driving mechanisms of soil microbial nutrient limitation and carbon metabolism during succession stages of poplar-birch secondary forests</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Zhou, J., Li, G., Zhang, Z., Ma, D., Liu, Q., Sun, L., Pang, Y., Tian, J., &amp; Wang, X. (2026). Driving mechanisms of soil microbial nutrient limitation and carbon metabolism during succession stages of poplar-birch secondary forests. <em>Plant and Soil</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09079-1" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09079-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09079-1" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11104-026-09079-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Enzyme stoichiometry, Microbial nutrient limitation, Secondary forest succession, Soil carbon metabolism, Carbon use efficiency, Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry, Phosphorus limitation, Soil organic carbon decomposition, Poplar-birch forests, Cold-temperate forest ecosystems, Soil microbial ecology, Carbon sequestration</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">191260</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
