<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>carbohydrates &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/carbohydrates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 10:22:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Tryptophan Glows Brightest as Electron Beams Reveal Hidden Light in Biomolecules</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/tryptophan-glows-brightest-as-electron-beams-reveal-hidden-light-in-biomolecules/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 10:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amino acids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biological tissue imaging with electron beams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomolecular cathodoluminescence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomolecules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbohydrates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cathodoluminescence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[difference between cathodoluminescence and optical fluorescence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electron beam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electron microscopy signals in biological tissues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electron-beam excitation of organic molecules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electron-beam interactions with amino acids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fluorescence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-energy electron effects on biomolecules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light emission from organic molecules in electron microscopes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NADH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new insights into molecular radiation response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic molecule luminescence mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation damage detection in biomaterials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiolysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scanning electron microscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spectroscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tryptophan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tryptophan fluorescence under electron bombardment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=234634</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A systematic cathodoluminescence study reveals that aromatic amino acids, coenzymes, and carbohydrates emit light under electron-beam excitation in ways that defy the rules of ordinary fluorescence, with tryptophan glowing brightest and phenylalanine brightening under sustained irradiation.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When a beam of high-energy electrons strikes a crystal of tryptophan, the humble amino acid best known for its role in turkey dinners and serotonin production, it does something remarkable: it glows with an intensity that dwarfs nearly every other biological molecule tested. A new systematic study published in Results in Chemistry has mapped, for the first time, how a diverse panel of biologically essential organic molecules responds to electron-beam excitation, revealing that the rules governing this so-called cathodoluminescence are strikingly different from the familiar rules of optical fluorescence. The findings could reshape how scientists interpret signals from electron microscopes probing biological tissue, and may even point toward new ways of reading out radiation damage in soft molecular materials.</p>
<p>Cathodoluminescence, or CL, is a spectroscopic technique in which electrons rather than photons excite a material, prompting it to emit light. The method has long been a workhorse for characterizing inorganic semiconductors, phosphors, and wide-bandgap materials, where defect-related emission and excitation dynamics are well understood. Organic molecules, however, have remained largely terra incognita. Their structural complexity, strong nonradiative relaxation pathways, and susceptibility to irradiation-induced chemical modification have made them difficult subjects. Yet the payoff for studying them is considerable: high-energy electrons generate a broad cascade of secondary electrons that produce excitation and ionization events fundamentally different from those triggered by a laser or a lamp, potentially granting access to electronic states that optical methods simply cannot reach.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Wataru Inami and Yoshimasa Kawata with colleagues including Machi Takahashi, Kentaro Nakajima, Yu Masuda, and Kei Hosomi, chose their molecular targets with care. They compared three classes of biologically relevant compounds: the aromatic amino acids tryptophan, tyrosine, and phenylalanine in both their D- and L-forms; the coenzymes NADH and FAD, central players in cellular metabolism; and the carbohydrates glucose, glycogen, and sodium glucose-6-phosphate. All samples were measured as powders mounted on carbon tape inside a scanning electron microscope, with a parabolic collection mirror gathering the emitted light and feeding it through an optical fiber to a spectrometer equipped with a photomultiplier tube. Measurements were performed in vacuum at an acceleration voltage of 10 kilovolts and a beam current of 1 nanoampere, with the beam raster-scanned over the sample to record spatially integrated spectra.</p>
<p>The results were unambiguous in their hierarchy. Aromatic amino acids outshone coenzymes, which in turn outshone carbohydrates. When intensities were normalized to sodium glucose-6-phosphate, the weakest emitter, L-tryptophan registered a relative signal of roughly 305, while L-tyrosine and D-phenylalanine came in at around 10 to 11, NADH at about 3, FAD near 1, and glucose and glycogen at under 2. In absolute terms, L-tryptophan emitted approximately 30 times more light than L-tyrosine and 27 times more than D-phenylalanine. The likely culprit behind this dramatic difference is the indole ring, the fused double-ring structure unique to tryptophan&#8217;s side chain, whose conjugated system of delocalized pi-electrons provides an efficient channel for both electron excitation and radiative relaxation.</p>
<p>But here is where the story takes a turn that should make microscopists sit up: the dominant emission from tryptophan appeared not in the near-ultraviolet, where its famous intrinsic fluorescence lives, but as a broad, asymmetric band centered around 570 nanometers in the visible spectrum. The authors caution that this visible band cannot be straightforwardly assigned to the conventional low-lying excited states of the indole chromophore that govern ordinary photoluminescence. Instead, they suggest it may arise from solid-state or irradiation-modified emissive states, possibly involving molecular packing effects or multiple overlapping transitions. Notably, both D- and L-tryptophan showed comparable near-UV emission around 340 nanometers, yet the visible band was markedly stronger in the L-isomer, evidence that the visible component is not simply a scaled copy of the molecule&#8217;s familiar fluorescence.</p>
<p>Time-resolved measurements added another layer of intrigue. Under continuous electron irradiation, the 570-nanometer band of L-tryptophan steadily declined over 30 minutes, suggesting that the visible-emitting states are progressively deactivated or degraded rather than continuously generated. L-tyrosine, by contrast, held remarkably stable, its luminescence barely changing over 35 minutes of bombardment. Then came the surprise: L-phenylalanine did the opposite of fading. Its CL intensity increased with irradiation time, most dramatically between 10 and 20 minutes, while its dominant emission peak shifted from about 500 nanometers to 430 nanometers, a blue shift of roughly 0.40 electron-volts toward higher energy. Something about the electron beam appears to generate or activate additional higher-energy emissive states in phenylalanine, a molecule whose intrinsic fluorescence is normally confined to the near-ultraviolet and far too weak to explain these broad visible bands.</p>
<p>What could account for such divergent behavior among three amino acids that share the same backbone? The authors point to a competition between destructive and constructive processes. Electron irradiation can induce radiolysis and other chemical modifications that degrade existing emissive states, as apparently happens in tryptophan. But it can also create new radiative centers, as the phenylalanine results imply. Previous work has shown that self-assembled phenylalanine exhibits aggregation-induced visible emission, hinting that intermolecular organization and molecular packing, not just molecular composition, shape the CL response. The differing 430-to-500-nanometer intensity ratios between D- and L-phenylalanine reinforce this picture: the visible emission likely involves multiple electron-beam-induced emissive states whose populations depend on solid-state structure and irradiation history. The researchers are careful to note that their measurements alone cannot distinguish among molecular rearrangement, changes in packing, phase transformation, or specific radiolysis products, and that structural characterization before and after irradiation, for example by Raman spectroscopy, would be needed to settle the question.</p>
<p>The coenzymes and carbohydrates, though fainter, told a consistent story. NADH produced a broad band peaking near 510 nanometers but at only about one-sixtieth the intensity of L-tryptophan, while FAD yielded barely detectable signal across the visible range. Glucose and glycogen, despite glycogen&#8217;s being a complex branched polymer of glucose units, emitted nearly identical broad spectra centered around 460 nanometers, a neat confirmation that their shared glucose-based composition dictates their spectral character. Sodium glucose-6-phosphate, a central metabolic intermediate, glowed only weakly, with a low signal-to-noise ratio. Across all three classes, the degree of aromatic conjugation emerged as the decisive variable: the more extended and delocalized the pi-electron system, the brighter the electron-beam-induced glow.</p>
<p>The practical implications extend well beyond basic molecular spectroscopy. Electron-beam-induced autofluorescence has already been demonstrated in living cells, and cathodoluminescence has been observed in functional proteins such as enhanced green fluorescent protein and even in biogenic materials like human kidney stones. As label-free electron-beam microscopy techniques mature, understanding which biomolecules light up, at what wavelengths, and how their emission evolves under bombardment becomes essential for interpreting images correctly. A tryptophan-rich region of a protein will not simply mimic its optical fluorescence signature; it will glow green-yellow at 570 nanometers and fade with dose, while a phenylalanine-rich region may brighten and blue-shift as the beam lingers. Irradiation history, in other words, is written into the spectrum itself.</p>
<p>The study also demonstrates that CL measurements can serve as a sensitive readout of irradiation-induced changes in soft organic materials, a capability with potential relevance for radiation chemistry, electron-beam lithography of organic films, and even assessing radiation damage in biological specimens. The authors emphasize that systematic measurements as a function of accelerating voltage and quantified electron dose will be needed to disentangle direct excitation from irradiation-induced modification. For now, the message is clear and a little humbling: the molecules of life respond to electron beams in ways that neither textbooks on fluorescence nor intuition from optical spectroscopy would predict, and each molecule carries its own signature of damage, resilience, and transformation under the electron&#8217;s gaze.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Cathodoluminescence properties and electron-beam irradiation responses of biologically relevant organic molecules</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Electron-beam-induced responses of biologically relevant organic molecules</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Inami, W., Takahashi, M., Nakajima, K., Masuda, Y., Hosomi, K., &amp; Kawata, Y. (2026). Electron-beam-induced responses of biologically relevant organic molecules. <em>Results in Chemistry, 31</em>, Article 103940. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2026.103940" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2026.103940</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2026.103940" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.rechem.2026.103940</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> cathodoluminescence, tryptophan, amino acids, electron beam, biomolecules, spectroscopy, radiolysis, NADH, FAD, carbohydrates, fluorescence, scanning electron microscopy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">234634</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
