<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>canopy cover &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/canopy-cover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 22:08:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Human Pressure Is Silently Rewiring Himalayan Forests, Landmark Survey Reveals</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/human-pressure-is-silently-rewiring-himalayan-forests-landmark-survey-reveals/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Porter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 22:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abies pindrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthropogenic disturbance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biodiversity Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canopy cover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation of Himalayan woodlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of human disturbance on forest understorey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elevational variation in Himalayan forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest ecology in Garhwal Himalaya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest regeneration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest regeneration decline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest regeneration failure in Uttarakhand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garhwal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Himalaya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Himalayan biodiversity loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Himalayan forest disturbance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human impact on temperate ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human-induced changes in Himalayan forest composition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of human pressure on forest structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landscape-level impacts of human activity on mountain ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quercus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saplings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seedlings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxus wallichiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temperate forests]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=219578</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A detailed survey of 24 forest stands in the Garhwal Himalaya shows that human disturbance is disrupting tree regeneration, with more than a fifth of recorded species failing to produce any seedlings or saplings.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High in the Bhagirathi river catchment of the Garhwal Himalaya, where steep gorges give way to forests of fir, oak and deodar, the future of an entire temperate ecosystem is being decided in the understorey. A new field study of twenty-four forest stands between 1500 and 3000 metres above sea level has documented, in unprecedented detail, how human disturbance reshapes the structure and regeneration of these ecologically vital forests. The findings, published in Discover Forests, paint a picture of woodlands that still appear intact from the canopy down, but are quietly failing to replace themselves from the forest floor up.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Om Prakash Tiwari of the Department of Botany at HNB Garhwal University, together with Chandra Mohan Sharma and Yashwant Singh Rana, set out to test a deceptively simple hypothesis: that the regeneration ability, composition and structure of Himalayan temperate forests change as disturbance intensity increases. After a reconnaissance survey, the researchers selected twenty-four forest stands spanning the full temperate elevational band of the catchment, each characterised by a different degree of human pressure. The Bhagirathi Catchment Area, located in the Uttarkashi and Tehri districts of Uttarakhand, is a rugged landscape of high peaks and narrow valleys where commercial timber extraction, livestock grazing, fuelwood collection, agriculture, road building, tourism and hydropower development have intensified since the colonial period.</p>
<p>To quantify disturbance, the team went well beyond visual impressions. They measured canopy cover directly with a spherical densiometer, recorded the presence and frequency of lopping, grazing, litter removal, fires, stem cutting, hutments, scraping and resin tapping, and counted cut stumps in every sampling unit. From these data they derived disturbance indices based on stump density and total basal cover, and classified each stand as highly disturbed, moderately disturbed or least disturbed. Highly disturbed forests showed open canopies below 40 percent cover and heavy human activity; least disturbed stands retained almost closed canopies above 75 percent. Light attenuation within each forest was measured with a digital lux meter, allowing the researchers to link the physical light environment directly to the fate of young trees.</p>
<p>The sampling design was exhaustive. Ten 10 by 10 metre plots were laid out in each of the twenty-four stands, giving 240 plots in total, in which all trees greater than or equal to 10 centimetres in diameter at breast height were measured. Nested 5 by 5 metre quadrats captured saplings, and 2 by 2 metre quadrats placed along regeneration survey lines counted seedlings. This three-tiered approach, tracking the full life cycle from seedling to adult tree, is what makes the study a genuine diagnostic of forest health rather than a simple inventory of what currently stands.</p>
<p>The results were stark. Tree species richness ranged from just 2 species in a highly disturbed pure chir pine forest to 20 species in a least disturbed mixed broad-leaved forest, with richness values generally declining as disturbance intensified. Tree density spanned 411 to 840 trees per hectare, sapling density ranged from 587 to 3655 saplings per hectare, and seedling density from 944 to 6572 seedlings per hectare. Crucially, the highest sapling and seedling densities were recorded in moderately disturbed stands rather than intact ones, a pattern the authors attribute to moderate canopy gaps that increase solar influx and ground temperature while reducing humidity, creating favourable conditions for seedling establishment. Under heavy disturbance, however, seed sources collapse, and the entire regeneration pipeline fails.</p>
<p>Of the 41 species recorded across all life stages, only about 34 percent showed good regeneration, defined as seedlings outnumbering saplings outnumbering adults. More alarmingly, 22.6 percent of species showed no regeneration at all, surviving only as adult trees with seedlings and saplings completely absent. Species failing to regenerate included Acer caesium, Aesculus indica, Cedrus deodara in certain stands, Juglans regia, Taxus wallichiana and Ulmus wallichiana, among others. Such discontinuous population structures, the study warns, signal regeneration failure and raise serious concerns about long-term persistence, since populations without young individuals inevitably age out of the landscape.</p>
<p>The species-level stories are particularly revealing. The Himalayan fir, Abies pindrow, regenerated fairly well at higher altitudes but produced no seedlings at all in a highly disturbed Quercus semecarpifolia stand, where human interference was intense. The high-altitude birch Betula utilis showed poor regeneration overall and appeared only as saplings in some stands, marking it as a species requiring continuous monitoring. Perhaps most striking was the case of the Himalayan yew, Taxus wallichiana, whose regeneration was poor across most stands, apparently because its tiny population produces too little seed and because illegal lopping for pharmaceutical purposes continues unabated. Earlier research cited in the study notes that ruthless harvesting of twigs, bark peeling and whole-tree felling place this species at high risk of extinction, even though yew seedlings need only 2 to 3 percent of incident light to grow and can persist for very long periods under unfavourable conditions.</p>
<p>Statistical analysis confirmed that these patterns were not random. Sapling density correlated positively with adult tree density, seedling density correlated positively with sapling density, and total regeneration potential tracked seedling and sapling densities closely. Regression models showed that canopy cover significantly explained variation in seedling density, sapling density and total regeneration across all stands, while the density of cut stumps significantly depressed seedling and sapling numbers, and tree lopping significantly reduced total regeneration. The average diameter of trees in these forests was 31.38 centimetres, with most stands in a demographic transition phase dominated by smaller diameter classes, and old-growth trees either dead or displaced from the upper canopy by past disturbance and habitat fragmentation.</p>
<p>Population structure analysis added a further layer of insight. Many dominant species, including Abies pindrow, Quercus semecarpifolia and Rhododendron arboreum in several stands, displayed the inverse-J shaped diameter distributions that signal stable, self-replacing populations. Others showed sporadic or unimodal structures, with gaps in intermediate size classes or peaks that indicate hampered seedling establishment and intense competition. Logarithmic density-diameter curves ranged from near-linear to reverse-J and sigmoid shapes, with depressions in the mid-diameter range of many stands pointing to disturbance-driven mortality at those sizes. Notably, several species, including Abies spectabilis, Betula utilis and Lyonia ovalifolia, were recorded as new recruits outside their conventional altitudinal ranges, suggesting that some dominant species may be shifting uphill toward alpine meadows under changing climatic conditions.</p>
<p>The authors argue that the findings carry an urgent management message. Forests near human settlements at lower altitudes experienced the heaviest pressure, partly because peak seed production in many trees coincides with the period of intensive forest resource collection, and seasonal migration of communities to upper reaches compounds the problem, with fir planks and oak logs harvested for temporary wooden hutments. The study concludes that species showing poor or no regeneration require immediate conservation intervention and assisted regeneration, including enrichment planting with native, site-appropriate species, to arrest population decline. Cut-stump density and canopy cover emerged as the most decisive factors governing tree regeneration in the catchment, offering managers concrete, measurable levers. As the Himalaya warms and human pressure mounts, this survey provides both a warning and a baseline: the temperate forests of the Bhagirathi catchment can still sustain themselves, but only where the disturbance clock is slowed and the next generation of trees is given a fighting chance to grow.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Regeneration and structure of temperate Himalayan forests along altitudinal and human disturbance gradients</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Forest structure and regeneration responses to altitudinal and disturbance gradients in the temperate Garhwal Himalaya</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Tiwari, O. P., Sharma, C. M., &amp; Rana, Y. S. (2026). Forest structure and regeneration responses to altitudinal and disturbance gradients in the temperate Garhwal Himalaya. <em>Discover Forests, 2</em>(1), Article 71. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44415-026-00135-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44415-026-00135-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44415-026-00135-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44415-026-00135-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Himalaya, forest regeneration, anthropogenic disturbance, temperate forests, canopy cover, seedlings, saplings, Abies pindrow, Quercus, Taxus wallichiana, biodiversity conservation, Garhwal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">219578</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forest Structure and Soil Texture Steer Carbon Storage in Nepal&#8217;s Community Forests</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/forest-structure-and-soil-texture-steer-carbon-storage-in-nepals-community-forests/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 15:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[above-ground forest architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthropogenic disturbance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basal area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[below-ground soil organic carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotic and abiotic factors in carbon storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canopy cover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon measurement in forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate policy and forest management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community forestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community forests in Nepal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest carbon storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest structure influence on climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest types in Nepal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Himalayan forest ecosystem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nepal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REDD+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shorea robusta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil and vegetation interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil organic carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil texture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil texture impact on carbon sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stand structure]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=206559</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A study of Nepal's mid-hill community forests finds that stand structure, especially basal area and canopy cover, drives vegetation carbon storage while soil texture, particularly silt and sand content, regulates soil organic carbon.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deep in the mid-hills of Nepal, where community-managed forests blanket steep slopes above the Pokhara Valley, scientists have uncovered a deceptively simple truth about how forests lock away carbon: what matters most above ground is the architecture of the trees themselves, while what matters below ground is the texture of the soil. A new study published in Discover Forests provides one of the most integrated assessments to date of the biotic and abiotic forces governing carbon storage in community forests, and its findings carry immediate consequences for climate policy in the Himalayan region and beyond.</p>
<p>The research, led by Binayak Poudel of the Institute of Forestry at Tribhuvan University, together with colleagues in Canada and Nepal, quantified both vegetation carbon and soil organic carbon across three dominant forest types: Shorea robusta (sal), Pinus roxburghii (chir pine), and mixed broadleaved forests. Working in two community forests in Kaski District—the 162-hectare Sityum Kasyari and Simsar Patleswara Jukepani Community Forest and the 14-hectare Banpale Community Forest—the team established nineteen nested circular plots of 500 square meters each, measuring every tree with a diameter at breast height of at least five centimeters. Soil samples were collected from four depth intervals reaching down to 80 centimeters, with five subsamples composited at each depth to smooth out local heterogeneity.</p>
<p>The results were striking. Shorea robusta forests emerged as the undisputed carbon champions, storing 113.5 plus or minus 7.1 megagrams of carbon per hectare in vegetation and 102.0 plus or minus 2.3 megagrams per hectare in soil—substantially more than chir pine forests, which held 96.5 and 85.5 megagrams respectively, and far ahead of mixed broadleaved forests at just 64.2 and 84.9 megagrams. Together, the sal forests banked roughly 215 megagrams of carbon per hectare across vegetation and soil combined, placing them at the upper end of the range reported for South Asian subtropical forests.</p>
<p>But the real analytical payoff came from teasing apart why these differences exist. The researchers evaluated fourteen predictors spanning stand structure, anthropogenic disturbance, soil properties, topography, and climate, using Pearson correlation analysis and principal component analysis to identify the dominant drivers. For tree carbon, two structural variables towered above the rest: basal area, with a correlation coefficient of 0.641, and canopy cover, at 0.635, both highly significant. Tree height and stem density, by contrast, showed only weak, non-significant positive relationships—a reminder that a forest crowded with small stems stores far less carbon than one anchored by a few massive trunks.</p>
<p>Equally important was what the analysis revealed about human pressure. The team constructed an Anthropogenic Disturbance Index combining stem cutting, leaf litter collection, lopping intensity, and fire influence, each weighted equally. This index correlated negatively with tree carbon at r equals minus 0.60, a statistically significant signal that where people extract biomass, carbon stocks suffer. Mixed broadleaved forests, which local communities depend on most heavily for fuelwood and cattle fodder, showed the highest disturbance levels and the lowest carbon stocks. Chir pine forests, whose needles are unsuitable for composting or fodder, experienced the least disturbance.</p>
<p>Soil organic carbon told a different story entirely. Here, the strongest correlate was not a property of the trees but a property of the ground itself: soil texture. Silt content correlated positively with SOC at r equals 0.587, while sand content showed a significant negative correlation at r equals minus 0.581. This pattern reflects a well-established mechanism in soil science—fine mineral particles form stable organo-mineral complexes that physically shield organic matter from microbial decomposition, whereas sandy soils, with poor aggregate structure and low water retention, accelerate mineralization. Canopy cover was the only structural variable significantly associated with soil carbon, at r equals 0.560, suggesting that dense canopies moderate soil temperature and moisture in ways that favor organic matter accumulation.</p>
<p>Principal component analysis confirmed this division of labor. For tree carbon, the first two principal components explained 53.2 percent of total variance, with carbon clustering alongside basal area, canopy cover, and stem density. For soil carbon, the first two components accounted for 52.8 percent of variation, dominated by textural and site variables. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance showed that forest type explained 45 to 46 percent of the variation in both pools—statistically significant for each. Intriguingly, elevation correlated negatively with soil carbon while aspect correlated positively with tree carbon, and mean annual temperature showed a positive relationship with SOC that the authors attribute to the co-distribution of warmer, more productive lower-elevation sal forests rather than a direct climatic effect.</p>
<p>The comparison with earlier Nepalese and Himalayan studies adds valuable context. Previous work in Makawanpur district reported sal forest biomass as high as 313.69 megagrams per hectare in well-managed community forests, while degraded stands in Dang district stored barely 99 megagrams. Protected-area studies in Shuklaphanta National Park found core-zone carbon stocks of 258.56 megagrams per hectare versus 193.3 in buffer zones—a protected-area effect that mirrors the disturbance gradient documented in the new study. The authors also note that Nepal&#8217;s total forest topsoil SOC has been estimated at 494 million tons, a figure that local-scale studies like this one help refine for national inventories.</p>
<p>The study is candid about its limitations. Nineteen plots distributed unevenly across three forest types constrain statistical power, and the geographic scope of two community forests in a single district limits extrapolation. The analysis relies on correlation and PCA, which identify associations without establishing causality, and the disturbance index applies equal weights to pressures that likely differ in carbon impact. Climate data at 1-kilometer resolution from WorldClim varied too little across plots to serve as strong predictors, and the fieldwork captured only a single post-monsoon season. The authors recommend denser plot networks, structural equation modeling, soil carbon fractionation, and longer observation windows in future work.</p>
<p>Yet the management implications are clear and actionable. Because basal area, canopy cover, and disturbance intensity are readily measurable in routine forest inventories, they can be embedded directly into community forest operational plans and carbon monitoring frameworks. Protecting large-diameter trees, maintaining canopy closure, and strictly regulating cutting, lopping, litter removal, and fire emerge as the highest-leverage interventions for maximizing ecosystem carbon. For Nepal&#8217;s REDD+ program and national carbon accounting, the message is that structural integrity—rather than forest type alone—should anchor carbon-oriented planning in the country&#8217;s community forests, which cover nearly 45 percent of the national land area and represent one of the developing world&#8217;s most celebrated conservation success stories.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Carbon storage drivers in Nepalese mid-hill community forests</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Stand structure drives vegetation carbon storage while soil texture regulates soil organic carbon in Nepalese mid-hill community forests</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Poudel, B., Bhattarai, S., Koirala, S., Chapagain, J., &amp; Timilsina, S. (2026). Stand structure drives vegetation carbon storage while soil texture regulates soil organic carbon in Nepalese mid-hill community forests. <em>Discover Forests, 2</em>(1), Article 69. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44415-026-00130-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44415-026-00130-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44415-026-00130-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44415-026-00130-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> forest carbon, soil organic carbon, stand structure, basal area, canopy cover, Shorea robusta, anthropogenic disturbance, soil texture, community forestry, Nepal, REDD+, carbon stocks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">206559</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
