<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>calcareous soil &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/calcareous-soil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 22:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Thirty-year residue trial links soil aggregation to carbon and nitrogen storage</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/thirty-year-residue-trial-links-soil-aggregation-to-carbon-and-nitrogen-storage/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calcareous soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crop residue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of residue return on soil physical structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of crop residue management on soil health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-Gangetic plains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of crop residues on soil organic matter accumulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term effects of crop residue return on soil nutrients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term field experiment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term field experiment on soil carbon dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macroaggregates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic carbon and nitrogen retention in calcareous soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice-wheat system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil aggregation and carbon sequestration in long-term rice-wheat cropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil nitrogen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil physical and chemical properties in residue management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil profile analysis in residue-traced soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable agriculture practices for carbon storage]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=328127</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A 30-year field trial in Bihar found that returning all available rice–wheat crop residue increased soil aggregation, raised profile-scale organic carbon stocks from 34.25 to 62.15 megagrams per hectare and strengthened carbon–nitrogen retention through 60 centimeters.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a 30-year field experiment conducted in calcareous soil in Bihar, India, progressively greater retention of rice and wheat crop residues improved soil aggregation and increased the retention of organic carbon and nitrogen through a 60-centimeter soil profile. The strongest effects occurred when all available crop residue was returned to the field. Under that treatment, the soil held 62.15 megagrams of organic carbon per hectare, compared with 34.25 megagrams per hectare where crop residue was removed, while the estimated carbon-sequestration rate rose from 0.11 to 1.04 megagrams per hectare per year. The findings come from a long-term rice–wheat experiment, rather than a short laboratory comparison or a survey of farms, and they link repeated residue inputs to changes in the physical arrangement of soil particles and the carbon- and nitrogen-bearing materials associated with them.</p>
<p>The experiment began in the 1994 kharif season at Pusa, Bihar, and was evaluated during 2023–2024. Its five randomized treatments included uncultivated soil, rice–wheat cultivation with no residue returned, and residue return at 25%, 50% and 100% of the available material. Each treatment had four field replications, and composite samples were taken from four depths: 0–5, 5–15, 15–30 and 30–60 centimeters. The site’s calcareous sandy loam initially had a pH of 8.6, an electrical conductivity of 0.36 decisiemens per meter, 0.62% soil organic carbon and 35.6% calcium carbonate. The subtropical site receives about 1,330 millimeters of rain annually and has distinct rainy, winter and summer seasons. Rice was grown under conventional puddling and wheat under no-till. Fertilizer rates, irrigation and other crop-management operations were otherwise the same across cultivated treatments, while the amount of residue returned was the defining difference among them.</p>
<p>Residue handling changed partway through the trial. Before 2017, crop residues were incorporated into the soil. From the 2017 rice crop onward, rice residue was used as mulch in the following wheat crop, while wheat straw continued to be incorporated. The uncultivated plot served as a long-term reference condition and was not a direct measurement of the soil’s carbon stock when the trial began. Soil samples were cleared of debris and stones, passed through an 8-millimeter sieve and separated by wet sieving into large macroaggregates larger than 2 millimeters, small macroaggregates from 0.25 to 2 millimeters, microaggregates from 0.053 to 0.25 millimeters and a silt-plus-clay fraction below 0.053 millimeters. Bulk density was measured for each layer, and carbon and nitrogen contents were determined within the separated fractions.</p>
<p>Returning residue consistently improved the size and stability of water-stable aggregates. Mean weight diameter, geometric mean diameter, the proportion of macroaggregates and the aggregate ratio all increased with the amount of residue returned, with the highest values generally recorded under complete residue return. The clearest responses occurred near the surface and became weaker with depth. Relative to the uncultivated reference, complete residue return increased mean weight diameter by 71% in the uppermost layer, 55% at 5–15 centimeters, 47% at 15–30 centimeters and 40% at 30–60 centimeters. Complete retention also produced the largest macroaggregate share at every depth and the smallest microaggregate and silt-plus-clay fractions. Bulk density was slightly lower with residue addition, although treatment differences were not statistically significant across depths. The pattern nevertheless indicated a shift from fragmented, less stable soil toward a structure dominated by larger aggregates capable of physically enclosing and protecting organic matter.</p>
<p>Carbon and nitrogen followed the aggregate-size gradient. Macroaggregates contained the highest concentrations of both soil organic carbon and total nitrogen, microaggregates were intermediate, and the silt-plus-clay fraction had the lowest concentrations in every treatment and depth. Macroaggregates contributed more than half of the soil carbon and nitrogen in the 0–5-centimeter layer, although their relative contribution declined as the profile deepened. Complete residue return increased aggregate-associated organic carbon across the profile: relative to the uncultivated reference, concentrations rose by 55–140% in macroaggregates, 52–67% in microaggregates and 107–199% in the silt-plus-clay fraction. Total nitrogen increased in parallel, and the bulk-soil ordering in the upper 30 centimeters was complete return, 50% return, 25% return, no residue and uncultivated soil. These results show that repeated residue inputs supplied organic material beyond the coarse surface layer and promoted its incorporation into multiple soil pools. Because the researchers did not directly trace carbon with isotopes or separately quantify undecomposed, particulate, microbial-derived and mineral-associated fractions, they could not determine the precise contribution of each pool.</p>
<p>The profile-scale stock calculations supplied the clearest numerical contrast. Total organic carbon in the upper 60 centimeters ranged from about 33 to 62 megagrams per hectare and generally rose as the residue-return rate increased. The uncultivated reference contained 32.78 megagrams per hectare, the no-residue treatment 34.25, the 25% treatment 41.01, the 50% treatment 44.68 and the complete-return treatment 62.15. The estimated sequestration rate over the 30-year period was 0.057 megagrams per hectare per year for uncultivated soil, 0.107 for the no-residue treatment, 0.33 for 25% return, 0.45 for 50% return and 1.04 for complete return. These are study-specific estimates based on measured stocks and assumed baseline information, not direct observations of atmospheric carbon removal. Estimated annual straw-carbon inputs ranged from 833 kilograms per hectare in the no-residue treatment to 6,731 kilograms per hectare under complete return. Yet the proportion of straw carbon converted to soil organic carbon remained similar across treatments, between 12.7% and 15.5%, indicating that the principal distinction was the scale of the annual carbon input rather than a dramatic change in conversion efficiency.</p>
<p>Total nitrogen storage increased with residue return and paralleled the carbon trend. Relative to uncultivated soil, the estimated increase in the 0–60-centimeter nitrogen stock ranged from 4.2% without residue to 54.9% with complete residue return. Residue retention also increased vertical stratification of carbon, nitrogen and their carbon-to-nitrogen ratios. Stratification ratios compare concentrations in the uppermost layer with those in progressively deeper layers, so larger values indicate stronger concentration near the surface. The 50% treatment had the highest surface-to-5–15-centimeter soil-organic-carbon ratio, while complete return had the highest values for the broader comparisons with 15–30- and 30–60-centimeter layers. The three residue-added treatments had statistically similar total-nitrogen stratification ratios, whereas the uncultivated treatment had the lowest values. These patterns show where organic matter accumulated, but they do not by themselves demonstrate a change in nutrient-use efficiency or crop nutrient uptake.</p>
<p>Residue management was accompanied by signs of greater biological activity in the surface soil. The geometric mean of five measured enzyme activities—dehydrogenase, β-glucosidase, alkaline phosphatase, acid phosphatase and phenol oxidase—was highest under complete residue return, followed by 50%, 25%, no residue and uncultivated soil. The reported geometric mean was 37.55 for complete return in the 0–5-centimeter layer, compared with 32.32 for 50% return, 28.14 for 25% return, 28.48 for no residue and 22.03 for uncultivated soil. Values in the 0–5-centimeter layer exceeded those at 5–15 centimeters. The enzyme results are consistent with a larger supply of decomposable substrate and more active cycling of carbon and nitrogen, although enzyme activity is a proxy for biological functioning rather than a direct measurement of microbial diversity, specific pathways or net mineralization. The experiment did not identify microbial taxa, microbial community shifts or the relative roles of roots, residue decomposition and mineral binding in producing the observed changes.</p>
<p>Multivariate analysis supported an aggregate-mediated explanation for the field pattern. A global redundancy analysis found that soil depth accounted for 73.6% of the variation in the measured physical, chemical and aggregate-related variables, while residue management accounted for 23.2%; together, the model explained 92.9% of the variation. Treatments receiving more residue clustered near variables representing larger, more stable aggregates and greater carbon and nitrogen storage, while the uncultivated and no-residue treatments occupied the opposite side of the ordination. A partial least squares structural equation model then linked greater straw-carbon input to stronger aggregation, aggregate-associated carbon and nitrogen, and ultimately higher profile-scale carbon and nitrogen stocks. The model reported coefficients of determination of 0.96 for aggregation, 0.97 for aggregate-associated soil organic carbon, 0.97 for aggregate-associated total nitrogen and 0.99 for both profile-scale carbon and nitrogen stocks. These figures describe performance within the specified dataset, not independent predictive accuracy: aggregate-associated carbon and total carbon stocks are mathematically related variables, so their shared variance inflates the apparent explanatory power.</p>
<p>Taken together, the observations show that three decades of residue retention altered both the quantity and the apparent physical protection of soil organic matter in this calcareous rice–wheat system. The simplest treatment—returning all available residue—produced the largest macroaggregate fraction, the strongest aggregate-associated enrichment of carbon and nitrogen, the highest measured profile carbon stock and the greatest enzyme activity. The evidence is consistent with a continuing stabilization pathway in which fresh plant carbon feeds microbial transformation and aggregate formation, aggregate structure protects organic material from decomposition, and finer particles provide additional opportunities for organo-mineral association. That pathway remains a mechanistic interpretation rather than definitive proof of causation: the structural model establishes statistical relationships among measured variables, while the field comparison does not trace individual carbon molecules or measure greenhouse-gas emissions. The results therefore show a strong field association between residue retention, improved soil structure and greater carbon and nitrogen retention under the specific climatic and agronomic conditions of the eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Long-term crop residue effects on soil aggregation and carbon–nitrogen retention in a calcareous rice–wheat system</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Long-term crop residue management drives soil aggregation and carbon–nitrogen retention in a calcareous rice–wheat system of the eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Jose, A. T., Das, S., Mandal, D., Bhattacharyya, R., Singh, S. K., Dey, A., Shrivastava, M., Singh, R. K., Saini, P., &amp; Aditya, K. (2026). Long-term crop residue management drives soil aggregation and carbon–nitrogen retention in a calcareous rice–wheat system of the eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains. <em>Frontiers in Agronomy, 8</em>, Article 1924145. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2026.1924145" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2026.1924145</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2026.1924145" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.3389/fagro.2026.1924145</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> crop residue, soil aggregation, soil carbon, soil nitrogen, rice–wheat system, calcareous soil, macroaggregates, carbon sequestration, long-term field experiment, Indo-Gangetic Plains, Long-term, crop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">328127</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sugar Beet Waste Beats High-Tech Fertilizers in Drought-Stressed Legume Fields</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/sugar-beet-waste-beats-high-tech-fertilizers-in-drought-stressed-legume-fields/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 14:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agricultural waste utilization for crop yield improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefit-cost ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calcareous soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison of natural waste versus nano-fertilizers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crop rotation in arid environments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit irrigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic benefits of using sugar beet waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faba bean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of alkaline soils on legume cultivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative approaches to sustainable farming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legume rotation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molybdenum nanoparticles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant stress tolerance in drought conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of organic residues in improving soil nutrient availability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil health enhancement with crop residues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soybean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugar beet residue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugar beet residue as soil amendment for drought-stressed legumes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable agriculture in desert soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water-efficient farming practices in Egypt]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=264895</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A two-season Egyptian field trial found that sugar beet residue at 24 tonnes per hectare outperformed molybdenum oxide nanoparticles and proline sprays in sustaining soybean and faba bean yields, water productivity, and profitability under deficit irrigation on calcareous soil.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the newly reclaimed desert farmlands of Egypt, where alkaline, calcium carbonate–rich soils and chronic water scarcity conspire against farmers, a humble byproduct of the sugar industry has just delivered a striking upset. A two-season field trial published in Plant and Soil found that sugar beet residue — the soil and plant debris washed off beets during processing — outperformed both cutting-edge molybdenum oxide nanoparticles and exogenous proline sprays in sustaining soybean and faba bean yields under deficit irrigation. The result challenges the assumption that engineered inputs must trump agricultural waste, and it arrives with hard numbers on yield, water productivity, and profit that farmers and agronomists can act on directly.</p>
<p>The study, conducted at the El-Nubaria Agricultural Research Station in Beheira Governorate, was designed around a soybean–faba bean rotation typical of Egypt&#8217;s expanding agricultural frontier. Soybean (cv. Giza 111) was sown in June 2024 and faba bean (cv. Giza 716) in November 2024, on a sandy clay loam soil with a pH between 8.04 and 8.19 and a calcium carbonate content exceeding 25 percent. Such soils are notoriously hostile to crops: the alkaline chemistry drives phosphorus, iron, and zinc into insoluble forms, while the fragile surface crusts easily and organic matter is scarce. When water deficit is layered on top, nutrient movement toward roots slows further, compounding the stress.</p>
<p>The researchers, led by Dalal Hereimas Sary of Egypt&#8217;s Soils, Water and Environment Research Institute together with colleagues including Ozkan Kaya and Harlene Hatterman-Valenti of North Dakota State University, set up a split-plot experiment with two irrigation regimes — full irrigation at 100 percent of crop evapotranspiration (ETc) and deficit irrigation at 75 percent ETc — crossed with seven treatments. These were an untreated control; sugar beet residue incorporated into the soil at 12 and 24 tonnes per hectare; foliar sprays of molybdenum trioxide nanoparticles (n-MoO₃) at 200 and 400 milligrams per liter; and foliar sprays of the amino acid L-proline at the same two concentrations. The nanoparticles averaged roughly 10 nanometers in diameter, while the sugar beet residue, collected from the El-Nubaria Sugar Company, proved remarkably rich: 83 percent organic matter, 1.8 percent nitrogen, 2.0 percent potassium, and a balanced carbon-to-nitrogen ratio of 27:1.</p>
<p>The yield results were unambiguous and remarkably stable across both crops. Sugar beet residue at 24 tonnes per hectare (SB₂₄) ranked first in every case, followed by the 12-tonne rate, then the high-dose nanoparticles, high-dose proline, and the low-dose versions of each, with the untreated control trailing last. Under full irrigation, SB₂₄ lifted faba bean plant dry weight, seed yield, and 100-seed weight to 9.63 kilograms per plot, 3.27 kilograms per plot, and 100.50 grams respectively — 88 percent, 146 percent, and 12 percent above the corresponding controls. In soybean, the same treatment produced the highest seed yield of 2.66 kilograms per plot and the highest oil content measured in the study, 21.45 percent.</p>
<p>The physiological data revealed why the treatments behaved so differently. Foliar molybdenum nanoparticles dominated one narrow axis: they raised leaf molybdenum concentrations dramatically, by roughly 89 percent in soybean compared with the deficit-irrigated control, and nearly doubled seed molybdenum. This matters because molybdenum is a rate-limiting cofactor for nitrate reductase and nitrogenase, the enzymes at the heart of nitrogen assimilation and biological nitrogen fixation in legumes. Delivering it as a nanoscale oxide through the leaf surface proved an efficient route into the harvested seed. Proline sprays, meanwhile, peaked on their own axis: leaf proline reached its maximum under the high-dose proline treatment at 75 percent ETc, hitting 48.55 micrograms per gram in soybean, about 16 percent above the control, consistent with proline&#8217;s well-documented role in osmotic adjustment and membrane stabilization under drought.</p>
<p>Sugar beet residue operated on an entirely different and broader front. Rather than targeting a single micronutrient or osmolyte, the organic amendment reshaped the rhizosphere, raising leaf and seed concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium simultaneously in both crops. Leaf potassium in faba bean reached 1.58 percent under SB₂₄ at full irrigation, and seed nitrogen in soybean climbed to 6.25 percent. The authors interpret this as rhizosphere-mediated action: the residue&#8217;s organic matter and cation-exchange-active functional groups progressively improve nutrient availability and uptake dynamics, in contrast to the foliar absorption pathway exploited by the nanoparticle sprays.</p>
<p>One of the study&#8217;s most intriguing findings is a counterintuitive biochemical signature. Ascorbic acid, a key non-enzymatic antioxidant, was highest in untreated, deficit-irrigated plants — 23.14 milligrams per liter in soybean — and declined progressively under the most effective treatments, falling to 16.31 milligrams per liter under high-dose proline at full irrigation. Rather than indicating weakened antioxidant defenses, the authors argue this decline signals stress relief: when a treatment successfully mitigates water stress, the plant no longer needs to deploy its full antioxidant arsenal, and freed metabolic resources are channeled into growth and yield. A negative correlation between leaf proline and seed yield in faba bean (r = –0.64) reinforced this interpretation, and principal component analysis placed the antioxidant pair at the opposite end of the productivity axis from yield traits.</p>
<p>Water productivity — the kilograms of seed produced per cubic meter of irrigation water — told perhaps the most consequential story. The SB₂₄ treatment combined with 75 percent ETc achieved the highest values in both crops: 0.56 kilograms per cubic meter in faba bean and 0.32 in soybean, which were 3.7-fold and 4.6-fold higher than the untreated controls under the same deficit regime. Because the deficit regime applied 4,742 cubic meters per hectare to faba bean and 6,507 to soybean, compared with 6,323 and 8,676 under full irrigation, pairing the organic amendment with a 25 percent water cut allowed the crops to squeeze dramatically more output from every drop. Notably, the SB₂₄ deficit combination matched or exceeded several full-irrigation treatments for seed nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, suggesting the amendment can partially compensate for a moderate reduction in water supply.</p>
<p>The economics sealed the case. Under full irrigation, SB₂₄ generated the highest returns in both crops: a gross income of US$2,302.22 per hectare and a benefit-to-cost ratio of 3.53 in faba bean, and US$1,418.44 per hectare with a ratio of 2.32 in soybean. Under deficit irrigation, SB₂₄ still delivered strong ratios of 2.93 and 1.84 respectively, while conserving roughly 1,600 to 2,200 cubic meters of water per hectare. The contrast with the control was stark: untreated soybean under deficit irrigation was the only combination to lose money, posting a net loss of US$115.42 per hectare. In soybean, only the two residue rates and high-dose proline cleared the break-even threshold under full irrigation, and only SB₂₄ did so under deficit irrigation.</p>
<p>The authors are careful to acknowledge the limits of their evidence. The proposed mechanisms — improved soil water retention, aggregate stability, and modified microbial activity — were inferred rather than directly measured, since the study did not characterize the soil water characteristic curve, hydraulic conductivity, bulk density, or microbial activity, and leaf gas exchange and water potential were likewise not assessed. The trial also spanned a single site and one rotational cycle. Still, the convergence of nutritional, physiological, multivariate, and economic data on a single conclusion is compelling: for water-limited legume production on calcareous soils, a low-cost industrial residue can outperform sophisticated nano-fertilizers and biostimulants, and the choice between applying it with full or reduced irrigation comes down to whether water or land is the scarcer resource on a given farm. As Egypt and other arid nations push agriculture into marginal soils, the most powerful tool on the field may be the one the sugar factory throws away.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Sugar beet residue, nano-MoO₃, and proline as stress-mitigating amendments for deficit-irrigated soybean and faba bean on calcareous soil</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Sugar beet residue outperforms foliar nano-MoO₃ and proline under deficit irrigation in a soybean–faba bean rotation on calcareous soil</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Sary, D. H., Emam, A. A. E., El-Nagar, D. A., Mahmoud, M. A., Kaya, O., &amp; Hatterman-Valenti, H. (2026). Sugar beet residue outperforms foliar nano-MoO₃ and proline under deficit irrigation in a soybean–faba bean rotation on calcareous soil. <em>Plant and Soil</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-08974-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-08974-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-08974-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11104-026-08974-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> sugar beet residue, deficit irrigation, calcareous soil, soybean, faba bean, molybdenum nanoparticles, proline, water productivity, soil amendment, legume rotation, Egypt, benefit-cost ratio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">264895</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cover Crops Boost Phosphorus Fertilizer Efficiency in Wheat by Up to Sixfold</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/cover-crops-boost-phosphorus-fertilizer-efficiency-in-wheat-by-up-to-sixfold/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 15:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apparent phosphorus recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calcareous soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation practices for phosphorus retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cover crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cover crops and phosphorus fertilizer efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[durum wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enhancing fertilizer use efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental benefits of cover cropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of cover crops on soil nutrients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improving wheat yield through cover cropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrated nutrient management strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iron oxides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legumes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient management in crop production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphatase activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphorus availability in calcareous soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphorus cycling in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphorus-use efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of cover crops in sustainable farming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil phosphorus cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil phosphorus fixation and mobilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable agriculture]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=262514</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A controlled pot study shows that cover crops, especially legumes and oat, can raise apparent phosphorus fertilizer recovery by a following durum wheat crop two- to sixfold depending on soil chemistry.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phosphorus is one of agriculture&#8217;s most paradoxical ingredients. Crops cannot complete their life cycle without it, yet the vast majority of phosphorus applied to fields never reaches a harvest. In calcareous soils it precipitates into insoluble calcium phosphates; in soils rich in iron oxides it binds tightly to mineral surfaces. The result is a global system in which a finite, strategically critical resource is squandered, driving both rising fertilizer costs and mounting environmental pressure. A new controlled-environment study published in Plant and Soil suggests that a familiar conservation practice, cover cropping, could dramatically change that equation, with the right cover crop multiplying the recovery of applied phosphorus fertilizer by a subsequent wheat crop as much as six times.</p>
<p>The research, led by Juan Nieto-Cantero of the University of Seville together with colleagues at the Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training in Seville and the University of Palermo, set out to answer a question that has received surprisingly little attention. While cover crops are well established as nitrogen suppliers, particularly when legumes fix atmospheric nitrogen into the soil, their influence on phosphorus cycling and on the fate of phosphorus fertilizer applied to the following cash crop has remained poorly understood. The team designed a pot experiment under controlled growing-chamber conditions to isolate the effects of cover crop species, soil chemistry, and phosphorus fertilization on durum wheat, one of the Mediterranean region&#8217;s staple cereals.</p>
<p>The experimental design was deliberately rigorous. The researchers selected two soils that were otherwise similar in texture and pH but differed sharply in the properties that govern phosphorus dynamics: one rich in carbonates, where phosphorus tends to precipitate as calcium phosphates, and one rich in iron oxides, where adsorption onto oxide surfaces dominates. Both soils had Olsen phosphorus values below the established threshold for a fertilizer response, ensuring genuinely phosphorus-limiting conditions. Onto these soils they grew five cover crop treatments: oat (Avena sativa), the common vetch Vicia sativa, the rustic Mediterranean legume Vicia narbonensis, and two mixtures of oat with each vetch, alongside a bare-soil control. After two months of growth, the cover crop residues were chopped and incorporated into the soil, and durum wheat was then grown to maturity, both with and without a dose of 50 milligrams of phosphorus per kilogram of soil applied as potassium phosphate.</p>
<p>The first striking finding concerned what happened to soil phosphorus during the cover crop phase. As the cover crops grew, they drew down the labile phosphorus pool, and Olsen phosphorus measurements declined significantly by the time the crops were terminated. This might seem like bad news for the following wheat, and it echoes recent reports that cover crop cultivation can deplete readily available phosphorus. Yet the picture changed after the residues were incorporated and incubated in the soil for a month. Olsen phosphorus partially recovered, driven by rapid turnover of phosphorus from decaying plant material and by a surge in microbial activity fed by the fresh organic carbon. In other words, the phosphorus the cover crops had locked up was not lost; it was cycling back into the system through decomposition.</p>
<p>The researchers went further, calculating an operational index they call P cycling potential, defined as the difference between the phosphorus taken up by the cover crop and the estimated decline in plant-available soil phosphorus. When this value is positive, it means the cover crop has accessed phosphorus from pools that do not normally contribute to the plant-available reservoir, effectively replenishing it from less labile sources. Three treatments showed this behavior: Vicia narbonensis grown alone, and the two mixtures containing it. Vicia narbonensis achieved the highest value, averaging 3.4 milligrams of phosphorus per pot across both soils, while Vicia sativa alone showed no net cycling benefit. The mechanism, the authors argue, lies in the phosphorus-mobilizing toolkit of legumes: exudation of organic acids such as citric acid that dissolve calcium phosphates or desorb phosphorus from mineral surfaces, and phosphatase enzymes that cleave organic phosphorus into plant-usable forms. Legumes need abundant phosphorus to sustain their nitrogen-fixing symbiosis, which partly explains their aggressive mobilization strategies.</p>
<p>Enzyme assays and microbial measurements added a crucial layer of mechanistic detail. One month after residue incorporation, acid and alkaline phosphatase activities were significantly elevated in soils that had carried cover crops. Treatments containing Vicia sativa showed the highest acid phosphatase activity, a 55 percent increase over the bare-soil control, and also the highest alkaline phosphatase activity, with gains of 66 percent in the carbonate-rich soil and 40 percent in the iron-oxide soil. Vicia sativa also produced the largest microbial biomass carbon, while treatments dominated by oat produced the smallest, likely because oat&#8217;s high carbon-to-nitrogen ratio slows decomposition. Interestingly, microbial biomass phosphorus did not track microbial biomass carbon, and the authors suggest that microbial immobilization of phosphorus, rather than depletion, explains why the treatment with the greatest microbial biomass also left the lowest Olsen phosphorus after incorporation: the phosphorus was temporarily held in microbial cells, a reservoir that mineralizes over time and feeds the following crop.</p>
<p>The most consequential result emerged when phosphorus fertilizer entered the picture. The apparent phosphorus recovery, an estimate of the fraction of applied fertilizer actually taken up by the wheat, was consistently and substantially higher after cover crops. In the carbonate-rich soil, recovery averaged 2.2 times the bare-soil control, with Vicia sativa delivering the highest value at 10.5 percent. In the iron-oxide soil the effect was even more dramatic: oat alone lifted apparent recovery to 11 percent, compared with a mere 1 percent in the control, an average sixfold improvement across cover crop treatments. The species-specific pattern is telling. In the carbonate soil, the best performers were the cover crops with the highest microbial biomass, pointing to microbially driven processes such as organic acid exudation that slow calcium phosphate precipitation. In the iron-oxide soil, oat excelled, plausibly because cereals exude phytosiderophores to acquire iron, compounds that indirectly liberate phosphorus held on oxide surfaces. The practical message is clear: the optimal cover crop for phosphorus efficiency depends on the soil&#8217;s dominant phosphorus-retention chemistry.</p>
<p>Equally important was what did not happen. Despite the temporary dip in Olsen phosphorus after cover crop termination, unfertilized wheat following cover crops showed no significant reduction in phosphorus uptake compared with wheat on bare soil. The feared short-term penalty of cover cropping in phosphorus-poor systems did not materialize, a finding the authors attribute to the steady release of phosphorus from decaying residues and microbial biomass, supported by elevated phosphatase activity throughout the wheat growth phase. Bicarbonate-extractable organic phosphorus, considered a readily mineralizable pool, did not decline during wheat cultivation, confirming that the organic phosphorus supplied by residues acts as a buffer that sustains availability. With fertilizer applied, phosphorus uptake by wheat increased by an average of 30 percent after cover crops, with oat alone driving a 45 percent increase over the control.</p>
<p>The study also surfaced nuances that complicate a simple success story. Physiological phosphorus use efficiency, the grain produced per unit of phosphorus taken up, worsened by about 17 percent on average when fertilizer followed cover crops, and the harvest index and phosphorus harvest index both declined under some treatments, particularly in the carbonate soil and with the cover crops that had built the largest microbial biomass. The authors suggest this reflects a stimulation of vegetative growth over grain production, possibly mediated by rhizosphere microorganisms energized by the influx of organic carbon. In agronomic terms, cover crops may shift how the wheat partitions its phosphorus even as they improve how much fertilizer phosphorus it captures, a trade-off that field trials will need to weigh against yield outcomes.</p>
<p>The implications extend well beyond the pot experiment. As rock phosphate reserves dwindle and agriculture confronts the twin demands of food security and reduced nutrient losses, strategies that squeeze more crop uptake from every kilogram of applied phosphorus become essential. This study demonstrates that cover crops can enhance soil phosphorus cycling without penalizing the subsequent cash crop, and can multiply fertilizer recovery two- to sixfold depending on soil type and species choice. The authors emphasize that their results must be validated under real field conditions, and they highlight a further frontier: interactions between cover crops and bio-based fertilizers derived from recycled phosphorus, which are expected to play a growing role as conventional supplies tighten. If those trials confirm the controlled-environment findings, the humble practice of sowing vetches and oats between cash crops could become a cornerstone of sustainable phosphorus management, tailored deliberately to the chemistry of the soil beneath the farmer&#8217;s boots.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effect of cover crop species and soil properties on phosphorus cycling and fertilizer-use efficiency in a subsequent durum wheat crop</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Cover crop cultivation and incorporation improve phosphorus fertilizer-use efficiency by subsequent wheat crop</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Nieto-Cantero, J., Perea, F., Laudicina, V. A., &amp; Delgado, A. (2026). Cover crop cultivation and incorporation improve phosphorus fertilizer-use efficiency by subsequent wheat crop. <em>Plant and Soil</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-08955-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-08955-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-08955-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11104-026-08955-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> cover crops, phosphorus use efficiency, durum wheat, soil phosphorus cycling, legumes, oat, phosphatase activity, microbial biomass, calcareous soil, iron oxides, apparent phosphorus recovery, sustainable agriculture</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">262514</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thirsty Soils, Hidden Phosphorus: Barley–Lentil Teams Mine Deeper When Water Runs Short</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/thirsty-soils-hidden-phosphorus-barley-lentil-teams-mine-deeper-when-water-runs-short/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 22:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barley-lentil farming practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calcareous soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crop rotation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crop rotation and intercropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit irrigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fertilizer efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grain phosphorus recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intercropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legume cropping systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lentil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-year field experiments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olsen-P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphorus availability in soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphorus mining and reserves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhizosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semi-arid agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semi-arid region farming challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil chemistry and pH impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil nutrient cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil phosphorus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water management in farming]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=260130</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A four-year Idaho field trial shows that deficit irrigation and barley–legume intercropping, especially with lentil, steepen soil phosphorus depletion gradients and boost grain phosphorus recovery in calcareous soils.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phosphorus is the quiet bottleneck of world agriculture. Unlike nitrogen, which can be pulled from the air, phosphate must be scavenged from soil, where it moves only a few millimeters per growing season and is quickly locked away by calcium in alkaline soils. A four-year field experiment in southern Idaho, published in Plant and Soil, now shows that two levers farmers already control—how much water they deliver and which crops they grow together—can dramatically change how much of this stubborn nutrient crops pull from the ground. The findings come at a moment when phosphate rock reserves are finite, fertilizer prices are volatile, and semi-arid regions face mounting pressure to produce more with less irrigation.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Asia Akter of the University of Idaho with Zachary Kayler and Hamed Arfania, set up their trial at the Aberdeen Research and Extension Center on a calcareous sandy clay loam with a pH of 8.3—exactly the kind of soil where phosphorus availability is most severely constrained. Over four growing seasons, from 2020 to 2023, they compared seven barley-based cropping systems: barley grown alone, barley intercropped in alternate rows with pea, lentil, or chickpea, and the same three legumes rotated annually with barley. Crucially, no phosphorus fertilizer was applied at any point, so every change in soil phosphorus reflected the crops&#8217; own ability to mine native reserves.</p>
<p>The irrigation design was equally deliberate. Half of the plots received full irrigation, replacing 100 percent of crop evapotranspiration—roughly 450 millimeters of water per season—while the other half received only half that amount, about 225 millimeters, simulating the deficit-irrigation regimes increasingly common across the water-stressed American West. Water was applied weekly through a fixed sprinkler system using evapotranspiration figures calculated with the FAO Penman–Monteith method and data from a nearby AgriMet weather station. The 2020 season, marked by above-average temperatures and below-average precipitation, made the deficit treatment even harsher than intended.</p>
<p>To track what happened below ground, the researchers pushed a soil auger 90 centimeters into each plot and sliced the profile into four layers: 0–15, 15–30, 30–60, and 60–90 centimeters. In intercropped plots, cores were taken between the barley and legume rows to capture the shared rhizosphere—the narrow zone of soil where roots, microbes, and chemistry interact. Available phosphorus was measured with the Olsen bicarbonate extraction, the standard method for alkaline soils, and quantified colorimetrically. Grain samples from every harvest were digested and analyzed by ICP–OES at a commercial laboratory to determine total phosphorus concentrations in the harvested seed.</p>
<p>The first striking result was temporal: across every treatment, Olsen phosphorus declined between 2020 and 2023, and it declined most steeply in the top 60 centimeters, the biologically active rooting zone. Below 60 centimeters, concentrations actually rose slightly, presumably because roots rarely reach that deep and biological demand there is minimal. With no fertilizer inputs, this pattern is a direct signature of cumulative biological extraction—crops steadily draining the native phosphorus bank. The depletion was strongest in the surface 15 centimeters and progressively weakened with depth, exactly where root density and rhizosphere activity are greatest.</p>
<p>The more novel contribution lies in how the team analyzed these vertical patterns. Rather than comparing phosphorus at isolated depths, they fitted linear depletion gradients across the 0–60 centimeter profile using a mixed-effects model that respected the split-plot experimental design. The model-estimated gradient was significantly steeper under deficit irrigation—minus 0.387 milligrams per kilogram per centimeter—than under full irrigation, at minus 0.301, a difference of 0.086 that was statistically significant at P = 0.037. In plain terms, water-stressed crops dug into the profile harder, extracting phosphorus from deeper layers more aggressively than their well-watered counterparts.</p>
<p>Why would less water lead to more phosphorus extraction? The explanation lies in soil physics and root physiology. Phosphate reaches root surfaces almost entirely by diffusion through water films in the soil; when soil dries, hydraulic connectivity breaks and diffusion slows to a crawl. Plants respond by investing in root proliferation, root hairs, and rhizosphere chemistry—releasing organic acids, protons, and phosphatase enzymes that liberate phosphorus from calcium-bound and organic pools. Deficit irrigation, in other words, forces crops to shift from passive uptake to active foraging, and the steeper depletion gradients are the fingerprint of that shift written into the soil itself.</p>
<p>Crop diversification amplified the effect. Barley–legume intercropping systems generally produced the steepest depletion slopes of all, with barley intercropped with pea and barley intercropped with lentil showing the strongest gradients at roughly minus 0.45 milligrams per kilogram per centimeter. The mechanism is belowground complementarity: barley&#8217;s dense fibrous roots excel at exploring soil volume, while legumes modify the rhizosphere through carboxylate exudation, proton release, and phosphatase activity, and both partners can tap mycorrhizal networks. The two species effectively hunt different phosphorus pools in different ways, extracting more from the same soil than either could alone—a facilitative interaction long documented in Chinese and European intercropping studies and now confirmed in a semi-arid calcareous soil under two water regimes.</p>
<p>The aboveground evidence matched the soil story. Lentil- and chickpea-based systems consistently accumulated more phosphorus in their grain than monocropped barley, and under deficit irrigation even the intercropped barley component outperformed barley grown alone. Grain phosphorus recovery—the ratio of grain phosphorus to available soil phosphorus—was significantly higher under deficit irrigation and in legume-containing systems, with barley–lentil combinations topping the rankings in both 2020 and 2023. A recovery index comparing each intercrop against its component monocrops told the same tale: under deficit irrigation, intercropped lentil scored 4.16 in 2020 and 3.28 in 2023, meaning the mixture recovered several times more available soil phosphorus into harvested grain than the corresponding sole crops.</p>
<p>The practical implications cut both ways. On the positive side, pairing barley with lentil under moderated irrigation offers a low-input route to better phosphorus nutrition, potentially reducing fertilizer dependence in regions where water and phosphorus are both scarce. On the cautionary side, the same mechanism that boosts recovery also accelerates the drawdown of native soil phosphorus reserves; without soil testing and eventual nutrient replacement, aggressive mining could erode long-term fertility. The authors are careful to note that rhizosphere processes were inferred rather than directly measured, and that future work should quantify root traits, phosphorus fractions, and microbial activity. Still, the study delivers a memorable message: in the dryland soils of the future, the crops that thrive may be those planted not in isolation, but in partnership—and given just enough water to be hungry.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Depth-specific soil phosphorus dynamics and grain phosphorus recovery in barley–legume cropping systems under full and deficit irrigation</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Depth-specific soil phosphorus dynamics and grain phosphorus recovery in barley–legume cropping systems under contrasting irrigation</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Akter, A., Kayler, Z., &amp; Arfania, H. (2026). Depth-specific soil phosphorus dynamics and grain phosphorus recovery in barley–legume cropping systems under contrasting irrigation. <em>Plant and Soil</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09043-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09043-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09043-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11104-026-09043-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> soil phosphorus, barley, lentil, intercropping, deficit irrigation, Olsen-P, grain phosphorus recovery, rhizosphere, calcareous soil, semi-arid agriculture, crop rotation, nutrient cycling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">260130</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chelated Zinc Boosts Groundnut Yields in Tricky Calcareous Soils</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/chelated-zinc-boosts-groundnut-yields-in-tricky-calcareous-soils/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 09:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits of chelated zinc in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calcareous soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chelated zinc fertilizer for calcareous soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crop yield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fertilizer management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groundnut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groundnut yield improvement techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groundnut zinc deficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of zinc on groundnut yield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micronutrients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient uptake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oilseed crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant micronutrient supplementation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil zinc deficiency management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamil Nadu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamil Nadu soil health study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zinc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zinc application in calcareous soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zinc availability in high pH soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zinc EDTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zinc fertilizer dosage optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zinc foliar spray for groundnuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zinc sulphate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=240818</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A field trial in Tamil Nadu shows chelated zinc EDTA outperforms zinc sulphate for groundnut in calcareous soil, with 10 mg of zinc per kilogram of soil delivering yields statistically equal to a higher dose.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zinc is one of those nutrients that plants need only in trace amounts, yet when it runs short, entire harvests can falter. For groundnut, the world&#8217;s fourth most important source of edible oil and third major source of plant protein, this hidden hunger is a chronic problem in calcareous soils, where high pH and abundant calcium carbonate lock zinc into insoluble forms that roots cannot absorb. A new field study from Tamil Nadu, India, published in the journal Discover Soil, has now put two competing zinc fertilizers head to head and identified a sweet spot for dosage that could save farmers money while lifting yields by more than 20 percent.</p>
<p>The research team, led by S. Praveen Kumar of Annamalai University together with colleagues from Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, conducted a factorial randomized block experiment on a farmer&#8217;s field in Thiruvannamalai District between January and April 2025. The experimental soil was unmistakably hostile to zinc: a pH of 8.11, a calcium carbonate content of 6.54 percent, and a DTPA-extractable zinc level of just 0.57 milligrams per kilogram, well into deficient territory. The team grew the groundnut variety Kadhiri 9 and compared two zinc sources, inorganic zinc sulphate and the chelated compound zinc EDTA, each applied at four rates: zero, 5, 10, and 15 milligrams of zinc per kilogram of soil.</p>
<p>The chemistry behind the problem is worth appreciating. In calcareous soils, zinc solubility collapses because the alkaline environment drives the precipitation of zinc as insoluble zinc carbonate and zinc hydroxide. Free zinc ions are also strongly adsorbed onto calcium carbonate particles, and elevated calcium competes with zinc at the root surface, while bicarbonates interfere with zinc transport inside the plant. The result is that even soils with reasonable total zinc can leave crops starving. Chelated forms such as zinc EDTA sidestep this trap by binding the zinc ion within an organic cage, protecting it from precipitation and keeping it mobile in the soil solution until the root can take it up.</p>
<p>That theoretical advantage translated into striking field results. Zinc EDTA outperformed zinc sulphate across every growth, yield, and nutrient-uptake parameter the researchers measured. Plants receiving the chelated form grew taller, branched more profusely, and accumulated more dry matter. The best-performing combination, zinc EDTA at 15 milligrams per kilogram, produced plants reaching 53.82 centimeters at harvest, compared with just 43.88 centimeters in the unfertilized control. Branch numbers rose from 3.95 per plant at flowering in the control to 5.11 under the top chelated treatment, and dry matter production climbed from modest control levels to 5344 kilograms per hectare at harvest.</p>
<p>The yield data tell the most compelling story. Pod yield peaked at 2269 kilograms per hectare with zinc EDTA at 15 milligrams per kilogram, against a control yield of only 1837 kilograms per hectare, a gain of roughly 23 percent. Kernel yield followed the same trajectory, reaching 1472 kilograms per hectare versus 1148 in the control, while haulm yield, the vegetative fodder that many smallholders value as livestock feed, rose from 2507 to 3011 kilograms per hectare. Shelling percentage, a measure of how efficiently pods fill with kernels, also improved, topping out at 64.87 percent under the highest chelated dose compared with 62.49 percent in the control. Notably, 100-kernel weight did not change significantly, suggesting that zinc primarily boosted reproductive efficiency and kernel number rather than individual seed size.</p>
<p>Here is the twist that makes the study economically important: the 15 milligram rate was statistically indistinguishable from the 10 milligram rate across virtually every measured trait. Pod yields of 2227 versus 2269 kilograms per hectare, kernel yields of 1444 versus 1472, and haulm yields of 2987 versus 3011 all fell within the critical difference, meaning the extra zinc simply did not pay. The researchers attribute this plateau to a physiological saturation point. Once the plant&#8217;s internal zinc requirement is met, zinc ceases to be the limiting factor, and consistent with Liebig&#8217;s law of the minimum, additional supply cannot drive further growth. The practical recommendation is therefore zinc EDTA at 10 milligrams of zinc per kilogram of soil, capturing the full agronomic response at lower cost.</p>
<p>The nutrient-uptake analysis revealed how deeply zinc fertilization reshapes the plant&#8217;s entire mineral economy. Nitrogen uptake climbed from 43.53 kilograms per hectare in pods under the control to 52.93 under the top chelated treatments, reflecting zinc&#8217;s role in activating enzymes such as nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase. Phosphorus and potassium uptake followed parallel patterns, as did zinc uptake itself, which reached 62.78 grams per hectare in pods under the highest chelated dose. Because zinc supports auxin synthesis, chlorophyll formation, and carbohydrate metabolism, adequate supply ripples through photosynthate translocation, pollen viability, and pod set, linking micronutrient status directly to the machinery of reproduction.</p>
<p>The soil itself bore the fingerprint of better-fed crops. Post-harvest available nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium all declined as zinc rates increased, not because zinc depleted them chemically, but because the larger plants extracted more of each nutrient. Residual soil zinc, by contrast, was highest and most persistent under zinc EDTA, with the 10 and 15 milligram chelated treatments leaving 0.75 and 0.76 milligrams per kilogram respectively, compared with 0.45 in the control. The chelated form&#8217;s resistance to fixation means it keeps feeding the soil&#8217;s available zinc pool after harvest, a bonus for the following season&#8217;s crop.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most elegant piece of the analysis was a principal component assessment of all measured variables. The first principal component alone explained 98.80 percent of the total variance, with plant height, dry matter production, pod yield, haulm yield, phosphorus uptake, and zinc uptake all clustering tightly along its positive axis. In plain terms, nearly all of the variation among treatments could be summarized by a single underlying factor: zinc nutrition. Available phosphorus pointed in the opposite direction, consistent with its depletion by hungrier plants, while available zinc sat near the origin. The multivariate picture confirmed what the individual comparisons suggested, that zinc fertilization was the dominant driver of crop performance in this system.</p>
<p>The authors are candid about the study&#8217;s limits. The experiment ran for a single season at one location, and long-term effects on soil fertility were not assessed, so multi-location and multi-season trials will be needed before the recommendation travels widely. Still, the implications are significant for the roughly 228.8 million hectares of calcareous soils in India, nearly 69 percent of the country&#8217;s land area, and for the millions of tonnes of groundnut grown across Asia and Africa on similar terrain. Zinc deficiency alone can shave 15 to 20 percent off groundnut yields in these soils, and this study suggests that a modest, precisely targeted dose of chelated zinc can recover much of that loss without waste. For farmers weighing fertilizer budgets against harvest prospects, the message is refreshingly concrete: choose the chelated form, apply 10 milligrams of zinc per kilogram of soil, and let the chemistry do the rest.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effect of zinc fertilizer source and application rate on groundnut productivity in calcareous soil</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Effect of zinc source and application rate on groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) productivity in calcareous soil</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Kumar, S. P., Sathiyamurthi, S., Poonkodi, P., Muthukumararaja, T., &amp; Prabudoss, V. (2026). Effect of zinc source and application rate on groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) productivity in calcareous soil. <em>Discover Soil, 3</em>(1), Article 180. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00337-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00337-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00337-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44378-026-00337-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> groundnut, zinc, zinc EDTA, zinc sulphate, calcareous soil, soil chemistry, micronutrients, nutrient uptake, crop yield, fertilizer management, oilseed crops, Tamil Nadu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">240818</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Compost Outperforms Manures in Cleaning Oil-Soaked Calcareous Soil</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/compost-outperforms-manures-in-cleaning-oil-soaked-calcareous-soil/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 08:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bio-composting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioremediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C/N ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calcareous soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calcareous soil contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicken manure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compost vs manure for soil cleaning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crude oil contamination cleanup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact of illegal oil refineries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental standards in oil processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of petroleum spills on soil health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraqi Kurdistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial degradation of hydrocarbons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil pollution in Kurdistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil spill bioremediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil-contaminated soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil-soaked soil treatment methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sheep manure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil bioremediation strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable soil remediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[total nitrogen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[total petroleum hydrocarbons]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=234210</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A 60-day field-scale trial in Iraqi Kurdistan shows that bio-composting with mature compost delivers the best nutrient balance and hydrocarbon removal in crude-oil-contaminated calcareous soil.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Kwashe industrial area of Duhok, Iraqi Kurdistan, more than fifty small private refineries process crude oil with little regard for environmental standards. The consequences are written into the ground: an estimated 15,000 to 20,000 tons of crude oil and refined products such as diesel, gasoline, kerosene and lubricating oils escape into the surrounding soil and water every year, from roughly 500,000 tons of oil handled illegally across the district. A new open-access study in Discover Soil by Suzan Qaseem Hasan, Mustafa Ismail Umer and Ramadhan Omer Hussien of the University of Duhok now offers the region&#8217;s first systematic comparison of bioremediation strategies for these heavily polluted, calcium-carbonate-rich soils, and its verdict is clear: mature compost beats manures, and doing nothing is the worst option of all.</p>
<p>The scale of the problem in Kwashe is striking when placed in global context. Nigeria&#8217;s Niger Delta, one of the world&#8217;s most notorious oil-pollution hotspots, accumulated roughly 10 million tons of spilled crude over five decades, while China reports 1.5 to 2 million tons of petroleum-related soil contamination annually. A single industrial zone in Kurdistan releasing up to 20,000 tons per year represents an extraordinary local burden. Once oil enters soil, it follows three main pathways: it adsorbs onto organic matter and mineral surfaces, it dissolves only minimally into soil water because hydrocarbons are hydrophobic, and its lighter fractions volatilize into the air. In Kwashe, surface spills from refineries and unlined waste pits are the primary entry route, followed by downward migration through the vadose zone and lateral spreading via rain-driven runoff.</p>
<p>Oil contamination fundamentally rewires soil chemistry and biology. It reduces water infiltration, creates water repellency, lowers pH, strips out available nitrogen and phosphorus, and reshapes microbial communities toward hydrocarbon-degrading specialists. Conventional cleanup options such as incineration, landfilling, thermal desorption and chemical oxidation cost between US$200 and $1,500 per ton, consume enormous energy, generate secondary pollutants like dioxins and nitrogen oxides, and destroy the soil&#8217;s structure and living biota. For vast, resource-limited contamination zones like Kwashe, biological approaches that harness soil microbes to digest hydrocarbons are far more attractive, provided the microbes receive the nutrients they need to keep working.</p>
<p>The research team hauled two to three tons of polluted clay-loam soil, sampled from the top 30 centimeters at ten random points across a 500-square-meter contaminated area near the refineries, to the College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences in Duhok. There they built six experimental heaps, each one meter wide and 1.5 meters high, representing five treatments plus a non-polluted control soil collected from an uncontaminated agricultural field five kilometers upwind. The treatments were intrinsic bioremediation, in which polluted soil was simply left undisturbed; biostimulation through aeration and watering; and three bio-composting variants in which the soil was amended with sheep manure, chicken manure or mature compost. All treated heaps were moistened to 80 percent of water-holding capacity, covered with nylon sheeting to trap heat and odor, and turned at two-day intervals through the thermophilic phase, which began around day eight when temperatures climbed to 55 to 65 degrees Celsius, the window in which rapid hydrocarbon breakdown occurs.</p>
<p>Over 60 days, the researchers tracked four key soil health indices: total nitrogen, total organic carbon, total organic matter and the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio. The nitrogen story was dramatic. Chicken manure started with the highest nitrogen at 0.822 percent, followed closely by compost at 0.801 percent and sheep manure at 0.680 percent, while the unamended treatments languished below 0.07 percent. Yet by day 60, chicken manure had lost a staggering 76.5 percent of its nitrogen, sheep manure 62.4 percent, and compost only 37.6 percent, retaining a final 0.301 percent. The authors attribute the chicken manure collapse to its high uric acid and protein content, which microbes mineralize rapidly, followed by ammonia volatilization during the hot thermophilic phase. Compost&#8217;s lignin-rich, less labile nitrogen fraction releases slowly and resists volatilization, which is precisely what sustained bioremediation requires.</p>
<p>Organic carbon told a parallel tale. The compost treatment maintained the highest total organic carbon at every time point, declining just 39.2 percent from 6.931 to 4.216 percent, and its time-point differences were not all statistically significant, indicating genuine carbon stabilization. Sheep manure lost 36.7 percent, while chicken manure, which began with far less carbon, shed 54.6 percent of it. Biostimulation fared worst, losing 60.7 percent of its organic carbon, because aeration without amendments simply accelerates the oxidation of whatever carbon exists without replenishing the pool. Total organic matter followed the same pattern, with all three bio-composting treatments retaining 11 to 13.7 percent at day 60, versus a catastrophic 60.7 percent loss under intrinsic bioremediation. Interestingly, chicken manure retained the most absolute organic matter despite losing carbon fastest, because loss-on-ignition counts nitrogen, sulfur and microbial biomass alongside carbon, and its nitrogen-rich composition inflated that measure.</p>
<p>The carbon-to-nitrogen ratio proved to be the decisive indicator. Microbial hydrocarbon degradation works best between roughly 15:1 and 30:1, and only the compost treatment stayed within or near that optimal band throughout, drifting from 13.41 to 22.60 over 60 days. Sheep manure crossed into moderate nitrogen limitation by day 60 at 38.31, and chicken manure, despite its nitrogen-rich start, rocketed to 59.75, a paradoxical 293 percent increase driven by rapid carbon mineralization and nitrogen loss. Biostimulation peaked at 68.21 before easing to 34.56, but intrinsic bioremediation was the disaster the authors had hypothesized: its C/N ratio soared past 100, from 45.44 to 100.61, signaling extreme nitrogen starvation that effectively stalls microbial metabolism, because carbon-rich, nitrogen-poor conditions prevent the enzyme synthesis on which hydrocarbon digestion depends.</p>
<p>What makes these nutrient dynamics matter is how tightly they track actual oil removal. Supplementary total petroleum hydrocarbon data revealed a strong negative correlation between final C/N ratio and TPH reduction, with a correlation coefficient of minus 0.89. Compost achieved the highest TPH reduction at 75.5 percent, sheep manure a strong 67.9 percent, biostimulation a modest 31 percent, and intrinsic bioremediation a dismal 22.4 percent. A separate correlation of 0.82 between nitrogen retention and TPH reduction cements the conclusion that sustained nitrogen availability is the primary engine of hydrocarbon degradation in these calcareous soils. The authors caution that they did not directly enumerate microbes, so references to hydrocarbon-degrading genera such as Pseudomonas, Bacillus and Mycobacterium rest on established literature rather than direct measurement, and the 60-day window captures only the active composting phase rather than long-term recovery.</p>
<p>The practical implications for polluted regions are immediate. Chicken manure, often favored for its cheap, concentrated nutrients, emerges from this study as a short-term booster rather than a durable solution, better suited to an initial nutrient pulse than to lasting soil restoration. Sheep manure offers a respectable middle path with its balanced 21:1 starting ratio and fibrous structure. But mature compost, with its recalcitrant lignin, humic substances and slow-release nutrients, is the amendment the researchers recommend for large-scale deployment in Kurdistan and comparable calcareous environments. It optimizes nutrient cycling, keeps microbial degradation running within the optimal C/N window, and leaves the soil more stable and fertile than any alternative tested. As oil pollution continues to accumulate wherever refining outpaces regulation, this modest heap experiment in Duhok delivers a message with global resonance: the difference between a thriving microbial cleanup crew and a starved, stalled one can come down to the slow, steady chemistry of well-made compost.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Bioremediation of crude-oil-contaminated calcareous soil using organic amendments</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Dynamics of some bioremediation techniques indices in calcareous oil-contaminated soil</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Hasan, S. Q., Umer, M. I., &amp; Hussien, R. O. (2026). Dynamics of some bioremediation techniques indices in calcareous oil-contaminated soil. <em>Discover Soil, 3</em>(1), Article 119. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00263-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00263-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00263-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44378-026-00263-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> bioremediation, oil-contaminated soil, calcareous soil, bio-composting, compost, chicken manure, sheep manure, C/N ratio, total nitrogen, organic carbon, total petroleum hydrocarbons, Iraqi Kurdistan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">234210</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
