<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>C-(A)-S-H &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/c-a-s-h/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 01:17:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Ceramic Tile Waste Transformed Into Carbon-Neutral Bricks That Match Conventional Strength</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/ceramic-tile-waste-transformed-into-carbon-neutral-bricks-that-match-conventional-strength/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 01:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-(A)-S-H]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceramic tile waste recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate-friendly building materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compressive strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentally friendly brick manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fly ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geopolymer bricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geopolymer bricks from industrial waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green building innovations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial residue valorization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial waste valorisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life Cycle Assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-carbon cement alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N-A-S-H]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxide-rich ceramic waste applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reduction of landfill waste in ceramics industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sodium hydroxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sodium silicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable construction materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vitrified tile sludge reuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vitrified tiles sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste-to-resource in construction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=211886</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers in India have developed geopolymer bricks made from vitrified tiles sludge powder and fly ash that achieve 23 MPa strength with zero climate change impact compared to cement bricks.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year, the global ceramics industry grinds out billions of square metres of vitrified tiles for kitchens, bathrooms and office lobbies. The polishing and cutting that give these tiles their signature glassy finish also generate a fine, oxide-rich sludge that is difficult to dispose of and often ends up in landfills. A new study published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research suggests that this overlooked industrial residue could become a core ingredient of the next generation of green building materials, in the form of geopolymer bricks that match conventional products in strength while dramatically cutting their climate footprint.</p>
<p>The research, conducted by Praseeda Dandu and Rithwik Reddy Gattu of VNR Vignana Jyothi College of Engineering and Technology in Hyderabad together with Ravi Sankar Cheela of MVGR College of Engineering in Vizianagaram, set out to answer a deceptively simple question: can vitrified tiles sludge powder, a by-product rich in oxides of silicon and aluminium, serve as a viable precursor material for geopolymer synthesis alongside fly ash? Geopolymers are inorganic binders formed when aluminosilicate materials react with alkaline solutions, bypassing the energy-intensive calcination process at the heart of ordinary Portland cement production.</p>
<p>To find out, the team formulated ten different mix proportions, systematically varying the variables that matter most in geopolymer chemistry. They tested sodium hydroxide concentrations of 3, 6, 9 and 12 molar, adjusted the ratio of sodium hydroxide to sodium silicate activator between 2 and 2.5, and blended the vitrified tiles sludge powder with fly ash at substitution levels ranging from 10 to 50 percent. Each mix was cast into specimens and evaluated for the three parameters that govern brick performance: compressive strength, water absorption and bulk density.</p>
<p>The chemistry behind these bricks is elegant in its simplicity. When the alkaline activator contacts the silica- and alumina-rich particles of fly ash and tile sludge, it dissolves those oxides and reprecipitates them as a three-dimensional network of hydration products. The study attributes the observed strength development primarily to the formation of C-A-S-H, a calcium-aluminosilicate-hydrate phase, and N-A-S-H, its sodium-based counterpart. These interlocking gel phases densify the matrix, filling the microscopic pores between particles and progressively locking the material into a hard, durable solid that mimics the binding action of cement clinker without any of its associated carbon emissions.</p>
<p>The standout formulation emerged from the middle of the experimental range rather than its extremes. A brick containing vitrified tiles sludge powder and fly ash in equal 50:50 proportions, activated with 6 molar sodium hydroxide combined with sodium silicate at a 1:2 ratio, delivered a compressive strength of 23 megapascals at 28 days, comfortably meeting the requirements for load-bearing masonry in most building codes. Water absorption in this optimised mix measured below 6 percent, an important threshold for durability, since porous bricks that drink up moisture are vulnerable to freeze-thaw damage, efflorescence and salt crystallisation over time.</p>
<p>That the highest sludge content proved optimal is one of the study&#8217;s most commercially significant findings. In waste-valorisation research, performance frequently degrades as waste substitution rises, forcing engineers to trade environmental benefit for mechanical quality. Here, the opposite occurred: a formulation that diverts the maximum tested quantity of ceramic sludge from the waste stream also produced the best brick. The fine, reactive silica and alumina in the vitrified tiles residue appears to complement the fly ash chemistry rather than dilute it, suggesting a genuine industrial symbiosis in which one factory&#8217;s problem becomes another&#8217;s raw material.</p>
<p>Strength alone, however, was only half of the story. The researchers also carried out a life cycle analysis comparing their geopolymer bricks with conventional cement bricks across both mid-point and end-point impact categories. Mid-point indicators measure specific environmental mechanisms such as global warming potential, acidification and eutrophication, while end-point categories aggregate those effects into damage to human health, ecosystems and resource availability. The results were striking: the geopolymer bricks showed essentially zero impact on climate change, whereas cement bricks accounted for contributions amounting to roughly 100 percent of the climate change impact in the comparison.</p>
<p>This near-total decarbonisation stems from the fundamental difference in how the two binders are made. Portland cement releases carbon dioxide in two ways: the combustion of fossil fuels to reach clinkering temperatures near 1,450 degrees Celsius, and the stoichiometric release of CO2 as limestone decomposes into lime during calcination. Geopolymerisation sidesteps both processes, requiring only moderately alkaline activation at ambient or mildly elevated temperatures. The sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate activators do carry their own manufacturing footprints, which is precisely why the optimisation of molarity and activator ratio matters, since a leaner 6 molar solution minimises the chemical input while still achieving full geopolymerisation.</p>
<p>Across the remaining mid-point categories, the optimised geopolymer mix showed minimal environmental disturbance compared with both conventional cement bricks and other synthesised alternatives tested in the broader literature. The authors conclude that the resulting green geopolymer brick can serve as a construction material with significant physical and mechanical properties while remaining environmentally competent, a combination that has long eluded waste-based masonry products. Because the bricks simultaneously address two environmental problems, ceramic sludge disposal and the carbon intensity of masonry, they fit squarely within the circular economy framework that regulators and certification schemes increasingly demand from the building sector.</p>
<p>The implications extend well beyond the laboratory. India, where the research was conducted, hosts one of the world&#8217;s largest ceramics industries alongside enormous coal-fired power generation that produces vast quantities of fly ash, meaning both precursor materials are available locally and in abundance. If manufacturers can adapt existing brick production lines to handle alkaline activation, the study&#8217;s 50:50 formulation offers a template for scaling up: no exotic additives, moderate activator concentrations and a binder built almost entirely from industrial by-products. As the construction sector faces mounting pressure to decarbonise, bricks forged from polished-tile waste and coal ash may prove that the greenest building materials are sometimes the ones made from what industry throws away.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Synthesis and life cycle assessment of sustainable geopolymer bricks incorporating vitrified tiles sludge powder and fly ash</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Synthesis and environmental impact assessment of sustainable geopolymer bricks incorporating vitrified tiles sludge powder</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Dandu, P., Cheela, R. S., &amp; Gattu, R. R. (2026). Synthesis and environmental impact assessment of sustainable geopolymer bricks incorporating vitrified tiles sludge powder. <em>Environmental Science and Pollution Research</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38247-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38247-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38247-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11356-026-38247-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> geopolymer bricks, vitrified tiles sludge, fly ash, life cycle assessment, sustainable construction, compressive strength, sodium hydroxide, sodium silicate, industrial waste valorisation, C-A-S-H, N-A-S-H, carbon footprint</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">211886</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steel and Soda Waste Combine to Make Cement That Traps Chloride</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/steel-and-soda-waste-combine-to-make-cement-that-traps-chloride/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 21:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alkali activation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all-solid-waste cementitious materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blast-furnace slag and fly ash in cement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-(A)-S-H]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical industry waste valorization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chloride ion binding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chloride solidification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chloride-resistant cementitious binder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compressive strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact of industrial waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fly ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friedel's salt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ground granulated blast furnace slag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrocalumite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industrial waste-based cement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative cement formulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kanbara reactor desulfurization slag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soda residue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soda residue utilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steel industry waste reuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable construction materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste-derived building materials]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=198948</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have engineered a cement made entirely from industrial wastes that accelerates hydration, densifies its microstructure and locks up corrosive chloride ions in a stable mineral phase.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year, the global steel and chemical industries bury mountains of waste that could have been something more. A new study published in Waste and Biomass Valorization reports a cementitious material built entirely from industrial by-products, with no ordinary Portland cement at all, that achieves useful mechanical strength while solving one of the field&#8217;s most stubborn problems: the chloride ions that normally limit how far solid-waste binders can be used. The work, led by Yannian Zhang and Weijin Chen of Dalian Jiaotong University together with Yingliang Tan, Qingjie Wang, Moncef L. Nehdi of the University of Guelph and Weijia Meng, demonstrates a four-component system the authors call KSGF, combining Kanbara reactor desulfurization slag, soda residue, ground granulated blast-furnace slag and fly ash.</p>
<p>The two activating ingredients come from very different corners of heavy industry. Kanbara reactor desulfurization slag, or KRDS, is the residue left when molten iron is desulfurized in a Kanbara reactor vessel before steelmaking. It is rich in calcium and carries a strongly alkaline character, along with a meaningful chloride content inherited from the desulfurization process. Soda residue, or SR, is the waste stream from soda ash production, and it too is alkaline. Rather than treating these two materials as liabilities, the researchers paired them deliberately to create what they describe as a dual-alkaline solid waste synergistic activation system. Each waste contributes calcium, alkalinity and, in the case of KRDS, chloride ions, and the combination turns out to accelerate the hydration of the reactive components far more effectively than either activator alone.</p>
<p>The reactive backbone of the system is supplied by ground granulated blast-furnace slag, a well-established supplementary cementitious material from iron production, and fly ash, the fine powder captured from coal combustion flue gases. Both are alumino-silicate rich, and both respond to alkaline activation by dissolving and reprecipitating as binding phases. The team systematically adjusted the mix proportions of the four components and evaluated the resulting pastes and mortars with compressive strength and fluidity tests, mapping how the ratios of KRDS, SR, GGBS and FA governed early and later-age performance. The abbreviation KSGF denotes the full four-part system, while comparison blends such as KG, SG, KSG and KSF allowed the authors to isolate the contribution of each ingredient.</p>
<p>What makes the study more than a mix-design exercise is the depth of the microstructural investigation. The researchers characterized their materials using X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis with derivative thermogravimetry, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive spectroscopy. Together these techniques reveal which crystalline and amorphous phases form, how much bound water each phase holds, how the silicate network polymerizes, and how the solid microstructure develops in three dimensions over time. The results converge on a coherent picture of why the dual-alkaline system outperforms simpler formulations.</p>
<p>The first key finding concerns tricalcium aluminate, or C3A, one of the most reactive phases in calcium-rich binders. According to the study, C3A hydration is significantly accelerated by the KR desulfurization slag and alkali-slag system through the combined action of calcium, alkalinity and chloride ions. In conventional all-solid-waste binders, hydration is often sluggish, and one reason is that an early hydration film forms on particle surfaces, acting as a barrier that inhibits further reaction. The KSGF system attacks this problem directly. As Friedel&#8217;s salt, a calcium chloroaluminate phase, grows within the hydrating matrix, the crystallization pressure it exerts disrupts the hydration film, allowing slag hydration to continue rather than stall.</p>
<p>This mechanism has cascading benefits. With the diffusion barrier broken, hydration proceeds deeper into the slag and fly ash particles, producing more calcium aluminosilicate hydrate gel, the glue-like C-(A)-S-H phase that gives the material its strength. The study further reports that the calcium-chloride synergy enhances the incorporation of aluminum into the C-(A)-S-H structure. Aluminum substitution in the silicate chain is known to cross-link and strengthen the gel network, and the resulting microstructure is measurably denser: the researchers observed reduced porosity across the system. A finer, less connected pore network generally translates into better mechanical performance and improved resistance to the transport of aggressive species.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most consequential result, however, involves chloride. In cementitious materials, free chloride ions are notorious for depassivating reinforcing steel and triggering corrosion, which is why chloride-bearing wastes have historically been restricted in construction applications. The KSGF system flips this liability into an asset through the formation of layered hydrocalumite, a layered double hydroxide belonging to the AFm family of phases. Hydrocalumite&#8217;s positively charged layers and exchangeable interlayer anions provide an ideal host for chloride: the study shows that the activation system promotes layered hydrocalumite formation, which effectively immobilizes chloride ions and reduces the fraction of free chlorides in the pore solution. In effect, the binder locks up the very ion that would otherwise disqualify it from service.</p>
<p>The thermal behavior of this chloride-bearing phase matters too, because AFm phases can destabilize and release their bound anions at elevated temperatures. The authors report that hydrocalumite thermal stability is improved through enhanced Al-O and Ca-O bond energies via chloride-aluminum coordination. In other words, when chloride and aluminum coordinate within the hydrocalumite structure, the chemical bonds anchoring the framework become stronger, raising the temperature at which the phase degrades. This improves the overall thermal stability of the material and gives added confidence that the immobilized chloride will stay put under realistic exposure conditions, including fire scenarios that concern building designers.</p>
<p>Taken together, the findings address the three obstacles the authors set out to solve: low hydration efficiency, inhibition by early hydration films, and the restricted application of all-solid-waste cementitious materials due to chloride ions. The dual-alkaline system accelerates hydration, the calcium-chloride synergistic effect breaks the hydration film, reduces porosity and improves thermal stability, and layered hydrocalumite enables solidification of chloride while decreasing free chloride ions. The practical implication is a pathway toward construction binders in which the cement, the activator and even part of the chemistry that would normally be a contaminant all come from waste streams that would otherwise be landfilled.</p>
<p>The environmental arithmetic is compelling. Ordinary Portland cement production accounts for a substantial share of global carbon dioxide emissions, driven both by the calcination of limestone and by the fossil fuels burned to reach clinkering temperatures. All-solid-waste binders of the KSGF type sidestep clinker entirely, repurposing desulfurization slag, soda residue, blast-furnace slag and fly ash into a material whose hydration chemistry is not merely tolerated but actively engineered. The work was supported by the Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China and several Liaoning provincial programs, reflecting the strategic weight that Chinese institutions place on industrial waste valorization. If the dual-alkaline activation strategy proves scalable, steel plants and soda ash factories could find themselves supplying not waste, but the raw materials of a lower-carbon construction industry, one hydration reaction at a time.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> A dual-alkaline all-solid-waste cementitious system combining Kanbara reactor desulfurization slag, soda residue, blast-furnace slag and fly ash with enhanced hydration and chloride solidification.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Preparation and Mechanical Properties of KSGF All-Solid-Waste Cementitious Materials</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Zhang, Y., Chen, W., Tan, Y., Wang, Q., Nehdi, M. L., &amp; Meng, W. (2026). Preparation and Mechanical Properties of KSGF All-Solid-Waste Cementitious Materials. <em>Waste and Biomass Valorization</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-026-03785-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-026-03785-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-026-03785-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s12649-026-03785-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> all-solid-waste cementitious materials, Kanbara reactor desulfurization slag, soda residue, ground granulated blast-furnace slag, fly ash, chloride solidification, hydrocalumite, Friedel&#x27;s salt, alkali activation, C-(A)-S-H, compressive strength, sustainable construction</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">198948</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
