<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bundelkhand &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/bundelkhand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 11:48:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Nine-Year Field Trial Reveals Which Perennial Grasses Best Restore Degraded Semi-Arid Soils</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/nine-year-field-trial-reveals-which-perennial-grasses-best-restore-degraded-semi-arid-soils/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 11:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bundelkhand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon management index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate resilience in semi-arid agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison of grass species for degraded land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Degraded semi-arid soil restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought-prone region land rehabilitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fodder productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grass species effectiveness in soil fertility restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guinea grass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of irrigation on grass-based soil restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian grassland research for soil restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irrigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term field trial soil recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perennial grasses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perennial grasses for soil improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restoration efficiency index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semi-arid agroecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semi-arid land degradation solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbial biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil organic carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil organic carbon enhancement in semi-arid regions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable land management in semi-arid ecosystems]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=244329</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A nine-year Indian field trial found that guinea grass and a tri-specific hybrid grass most effectively rebuilt soil carbon, fertility, and microbial health in degraded semi-arid land, with irrigation amplifying gains and the hybrid showing superior drought resilience.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the drought-prone Bundelkhand region of central India, where summer temperatures can climb to 49 degrees Celsius and nearly all of the year&#8217;s roughly 908 millimeters of rain falls in just four monsoon months, a nine-year field experiment has delivered some of the clearest evidence yet that the right perennial grass can rebuild a broken landscape. Researchers at the ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute in Jhansi set out to answer a deceptively simple question: if you plant degraded semi-arid farmland with perennial grasses, which species actually restores the soil best, and does it matter whether you irrigate? Their answer, published in the open-access journal Discover Soil, carries practical weight for the roughly one-quarter of Earth&#8217;s land surface now classified as degraded.</p>
<p>The team, led by Mukesh Choudhary and Mahendra Prasad, compared four perennial grasses over nine consecutive growing seasons from 2015-16 to 2023-24: guinea grass (Megathyrsus maximus), a tri-specific hybrid (TSH), the bajra-napier hybrid (BNH), and the hardy rangeland grass Cenchrus ciliaris. Each species was grown under two contrasting moisture regimes, rainfed and irrigated, in a factorial randomized block design with three replications. The starting point was a sandy clay loam classified as a Typic Haplustept, with soil organic carbon of just 5.0 grams per kilogram in the top 15 centimeters, available nitrogen of 170 kilograms per hectare, and the low fertility typical of a region battered by recurrent drought, shallow undulating soils, and potential evapotranspiration of 2,565 millimeters per year.</p>
<p>The headline finding is that guinea grass emerged as the standout restoration champion. Under irrigation it produced a mean green fodder yield of 85.9 tonnes per hectare and dry fodder yield of 20.4 tonnes per hectare, increases of 37.0 and 28.3 percent over rainfed conditions. More importantly for soil health, irrigated guinea grass plots recorded the highest total organic carbon of any treatment, 9.56 grams per kilogram in the surface soil, along with the greatest hot water soluble carbon (146.13 milligrams per kilogram), particulate organic carbon (6.12 grams per kilogram), labile carbon (371.75 milligrams per kilogram), and soil microbial biomass carbon (365.83 micrograms per gram). These values exceeded the tri-specific hybrid, bajra-napier hybrid, and Cenchrus ciliaris by margins ranging from 2 percent to as much as 234 percent depending on the indicator.</p>
<p>Across all species, irrigation proved a powerful amplifier of both productivity and soil recovery. Green fodder yields rose by 11.9 to 44.7 percent under irrigation compared with rainfed conditions, and dry yields by 5.5 to 34.4 percent. Below ground, irrigation lifted total organic carbon by about 5 percent, hot water soluble carbon by roughly 19 percent, particulate organic carbon by about 12 percent, labile carbon by around 6 percent, and microbial biomass carbon by approximately 23 percent. Carbon buildup relative to the experiment&#8217;s starting conditions ranged from 3 to 41 percent under rainfed management and climbed to 5 to 49 percent with irrigation, with guinea grass and the tri-specific hybrid consistently at the top of that range. Available nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium followed the same pattern, with guinea grass under irrigation increasing nutrient availability by 5.8 to 16.6 percent relative to its rainfed counterpart.</p>
<p>To move beyond single measurements, the researchers deployed two composite metrics. The carbon management index, which combines a carbon pool index with a lability index against a reference fallow soil, exceeded 185 under guinea grass in both moisture regimes, a value well above the threshold of 100 that signals sustainable soil management. Under irrigation, guinea grass posted a carbon management index 21, 45, and 75 percent higher than the tri-specific hybrid, bajra-napier hybrid, and Cenchrus ciliaris respectively. The team also introduced a restoration efficiency index, a weighted composite integrating productivity, soil fertility, microbial health, and soil carbon dynamics, with biological recovery and carbon restoration weighted at 0.30 each. Guinea grass scored above 80 percent, the study&#8217;s threshold for high restoration efficiency, in both rainfed (86.7 percent) and irrigated (84.8 percent) conditions, while Cenchrus ciliaris languished at the bottom.</p>
<p>Interestingly, the tri-specific hybrid revealed a different kind of strength. Although its absolute yields and carbon metrics trailed guinea grass, it suffered the smallest penalty when the irrigation was switched off: its irrigated green fodder yield of 78.6 tonnes per hectare was only 12.0 percent above its rainfed yield, and its dry yield just 5.5 percent higher. That drought resilience translated into moderate restoration efficiency under rainfed conditions, with a carbon management index of at least 150 and a restoration efficiency index above 60 percent. The authors&#8217; practical recommendation therefore splits by context: guinea grass for maximizing biomass and soil carbon restoration wherever water allows, and the tri-specific hybrid as the more reliable choice for purely rainfed systems.</p>
<p>The study also probed the quality and vertical distribution of the carbon being accumulated. The recalcitrant index, the proportion of carbon resistant to acid hydrolysis, varied only narrowly, from 95.91 to 97.13 percent, with Cenchrus ciliaris and the bajra-napier hybrid tending toward slightly higher values. The authors interpret the lower recalcitrant index under guinea grass and the tri-specific hybrid not as a weakness but as evidence of active carbon cycling, with abundant labile fractions turning over rapidly in these biologically vigorous rhizospheres. In soils this depleted, they argue, carbon sink strength is limited primarily by the quantity of carbon inputs rather than by the soil&#8217;s capacity to stabilize them. Stratification ratios, comparing surface to subsurface carbon pools, ranged from 0.89 to 1.22 and trended higher under irrigation, consistent with litter, fine root turnover, and rhizodeposition enriching the upper 15 centimeters of the profile.</p>
<p>Correlation and network analyses added a systems-level view of how restoration proceeds. Soil organic carbon correlated almost perfectly with total organic carbon (r = 1.00) and very strongly with microbial biomass carbon (r = 0.97), particulate organic carbon (r = 0.95), labile carbon (r = 0.95), and the carbon management index (r = 0.95). Microbial biomass carbon itself tracked available nitrogen at r = 0.99. Within the correlation network, built from significant correlations of r at or above 0.85, the variables with the greatest connector importance were the carbon management index, labile carbon, microbial quotient, particulate organic carbon, and microbial biomass carbon, marking them as the most informative sentinels of recovery. The restoration efficiency index behaved differently, correlating negatively with these indicators, which the authors attribute to the mathematical structure of the composite index rather than any biological trade-off, and they candidly flag indicator redundancy and the author-defined weighting scheme as limitations requiring validation in independent datasets.</p>
<p>The broader significance is considerable. Land degradation undermines food security, biodiversity, and climate resilience worldwide, and restoring degraded lands is embedded in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Perennial grasses work as restoration agents because their deep, persistent root networks pump carbon below ground year after year, stabilize aggregates, reduce erosion, and feed the microbial communities that drive nutrient cycling. This trial shows that species choice and water availability jointly determine how fast that recovery happens, and it offers farmers and land managers in semi-arid regions a concrete, evidence-based menu: guinea grass where biomass and carbon gains are the priority, the tri-specific hybrid where drought risk dominates. The authors caution that the study covered a limited set of species in a single semi-arid environment, that the persistence of these gains under future climate variability remains untested, and that microbial community dynamics, greenhouse gas fluxes, and economic feasibility were beyond its scope. Still, after nine years of monitoring, the message from Bundelkhand is unusually clear: the humblest of crops, a well-chosen perennial grass, may be among the cheapest and most effective tools humanity has for putting carbon, fertility, and life back into exhausted soil.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Long-term comparative evaluation of perennial grass species for restoring soil carbon and fertility in degraded semi-arid agroecosystems under rainfed and irrigated conditions</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Comparative assessment of perennial grasses for restoring degraded semi-arid agroecosystems under contrasting moisture regimes</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Choudhary, M., Prasad, M., Dixit, A. K., Kantwa, S. R., Mahawer, S. K., &amp; Palsaniya, D. R. (2026). Comparative assessment of perennial grasses for restoring degraded semi-arid agroecosystems under contrasting moisture regimes. <em>Discover Soil, 3</em>(1), Article 182. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00342-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00342-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00342-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44378-026-00342-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> perennial grasses, soil restoration, soil organic carbon, semi-arid agroecosystems, carbon management index, restoration efficiency index, guinea grass, land degradation, soil microbial biomass, irrigation, fodder productivity, Bundelkhand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">244329</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Satellites and Smart Maps Reveal Where Hidden Water Lies Beneath India&#8217;s Driest District</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/satellites-and-smart-maps-reveal-where-hidden-water-lies-beneath-indias-driest-district/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 06:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytical hierarchy process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bundelkhand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decision algorithms for water resource management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital mapping for groundwater exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drought-prone regions of Uttar Pradesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geoscience studies on underground water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groundwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Groundwater depletion and sustainable management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Groundwater mapping in India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hidden water reserves in granitic terrains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogeology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impact of climate change on Indian groundwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landsat 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lineament density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mahoba district]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multi-criteria decision analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote sensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote sensing technology for water resource assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Satellite-based water resource detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban and rural water dependence in India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uttar Pradesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water scarcity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water scarcity solutions in India]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=233930</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers combined satellite imagery, GIS mapping and the Analytical Hierarchy Process to produce the first groundwater potential map of Mahoba district, India, validated at eighty percent accuracy against well discharge data.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In one of India&#8217;s most water-stressed corners, a team of researchers has turned satellites, digital maps and a classic decision-making algorithm into a treasure map of a different kind: one that shows where precious groundwater is most likely to be hiding beneath the hard, granitic terrain of Mahoba district in Uttar Pradesh. The study, published in the journal Discover Geoscience, is the first of its kind for this drought-prone part of the Bundelkhand region, and it arrives at a moment when the district&#8217;s underground water reserves are under relentless pressure from a growing population, expanding agriculture and increasingly erratic monsoon rains.</p>
<p>Groundwater is easy to overlook precisely because it is invisible. Yet it is the invisible backbone of Indian life: nearly half of urban Indians and about ninety percent of rural households depend on it for their daily needs. Globally, groundwater accounts for roughly thirty percent of the fresh water consumed by humanity, and more than seventy percent of the water supply in some regions is drawn from underground aquifers, which are being depleted at an estimated 545 cubic kilometres per year. India, home to eighteen percent of the world&#8217;s population, holds only four percent of the planet&#8217;s renewable water resources, a mismatch that makes every new well, every irrigation schedule and every planning decision a high-stakes calculation.</p>
<p>Traditionally, finding good places to drill was a slow and expensive business, relying on physical field surveys and geophysical instruments deployed across large areas. The new research, led by Mukesh Kumar of United University in Prayagraj, together with Pitam Singh of Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology and Priyamvada Singh of the University of Allahabad, replaces much of that legwork with a workflow built on geographic information systems, remote sensing and the Analytical Hierarchy Process, a structured weighting technique invented by mathematician Thomas Saaty in 1980. The result is a district-wide map that sorts the landscape into five categories of groundwater potential, from very high to very low.</p>
<p>The study area covers roughly 2,884 square kilometres in southwestern Uttar Pradesh, a landscape dominated by the ancient Bundelkhand Gneissic Complex and layers of Archaean and recent alluvium. In hard rock regions like this one, water does not sit in porous sandstone but in the cracks, joints and fractures that cut through the granite, which makes the search for productive wells especially challenging. Agriculture is the district&#8217;s main occupation, with wheat as a staple crop that demands heavy irrigation the rains cannot reliably provide. Seasonal rivers run thin, waterborne illness is common, and sanitation infrastructure struggles to keep pace, all of which raises the stakes of knowing exactly where the next borehole should go.</p>
<p>To build their model, the researchers assembled seven thematic layers that together control how water enters, moves through and is stored within the ground: lithology, geomorphology, rainfall, slope, land use and land cover, drainage density and lineament density. Each layer was constructed from publicly available data. Lithological and geomorphological information came from the Geological Survey of India at a scale of 1:250,000, while the drainage pattern was derived from the thirty-metre-resolution Shuttle Radar Topography Mission digital elevation model provided by the United States Geological Survey. Landsat 8 imagery, captured in May 2025 across four overlapping tiles, was classified using a supervised technique in ArcGIS software to produce the land use map, which revealed that barren land dominates the district.</p>
<p>Rainfall posed a particular challenge because the team had data from 156 individual weather stations spanning twenty years, from 1998 to 2018, supplied by the India Meteorological Department in Pune. To turn those point measurements into a continuous surface, the researchers applied Inverse Distance Weighting interpolation, a method that estimates values at unmeasured locations based on the values at surrounding stations, weighting nearer stations more heavily. The resulting map showed that the district&#8217;s largest area receives between 463 and 629 millimetres of rain annually, a modest total that makes efficient recharge and careful siting of wells all the more important. Lineament density, a measure of the fractures per unit area that act as natural conduits for water, was computed from Geological Survey of India lineament data using the line density tool in ArcGIS.</p>
<p>The heart of the method lies in the Analytical Hierarchy Process, which converts expert judgment into numerical weights through pairwise comparisons. Each of the seven factors was compared against every other using Saaty&#8217;s scale of importance, producing a matrix from which normalized weights were calculated. Subclasses within each layer, such as individual rock types or slope categories, were rated on a scale of one to five according to their influence on groundwater potential. Crucially, the technique includes a built-in sanity check: the consistency ratio, which measures whether the expert judgments are internally logical. The team&#8217;s matrix yielded a consistency ratio of 0.07, comfortably below the 0.10 threshold, indicating that the weighting scheme was coherent rather than arbitrary.</p>
<p>With weights assigned, all seven layers were converted to thirty-metre rasters in a common coordinate system and overlaid to compute a groundwater potential index for every pixel in the district. The final map tells a clear story. Moderate potential zones dominate, covering 1,837 square kilometres, or 63.7 percent of the study area, reflecting the region&#8217;s overall hard rock limitations. Very high potential zones are rare, occupying just 5.12 square kilometres, a mere 0.18 percent of the district, while low potential zones cover 10.52 square kilometres, or 0.36 percent. The best prospects cluster where rainfall is highest, slopes are gentle, drainage density is low and lineament density is high, conditions that favour infiltration and storage over rapid runoff. Conversely, the steepest, most fractured-drainage areas with the least rain scored lowest.</p>
<p>A model is only as good as its validation, and here the researchers overlaid their map with well discharge data from 37 wells recorded by the Central Ground Water Board in Lucknow, measured in litres per minute. The pattern was striking: high-yield wells overwhelmingly fell within the high and very high potential zones, moderate-yield wells landed in the moderate zone, and low-yield wells coincided with the low and very low zones. Overall, about eighty percent of the well discharge data agreed with the mapped categories, a figure the authors report as the model&#8217;s accuracy. They are candid about the caveats, noting that well discharge is also shaped by seasonal water table fluctuations, aquifer characteristics, well construction and pumping regimes, factors no static map can fully capture.</p>
<p>The implications reach well beyond one district. Because the entire workflow relies on open satellite data, freely available geological maps and a transparent weighting procedure, it can be replicated in other data-scarce regions where drilling campaigns are too expensive to deploy blindly. The authors position this map as the first scientific baseline for groundwater exploration in Mahoba, offering government agencies a rational starting point for siting wells, planning recharge structures and managing the district&#8217;s aquifers sustainably. They also outline the next step: the current output will supply training and testing points for machine learning, deep learning and ensemble techniques, which studies suggest can outperform statistical models in prediction tasks. In a region where a failed borehole can bankrupt a farming family, a map that raises the odds of striking water from guesswork to four in five is not just an academic exercise; it is a lifeline drawn in pixels.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Mapping groundwater potential zones in Mahoba district, India, using GIS, remote sensing and the Analytical Hierarchy Process</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Integration of GIS, remote sensing and AHP technique for delineation of groundwater potential zones in Mahoba district Uttar Pradesh, India</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Kumar, M., Singh, P., &amp; Singh, P. (2026). Integration of GIS, remote sensing and AHP technique for delineation of groundwater potential zones in Mahoba district Uttar Pradesh, India. <em>Discover Geoscience, 4</em>(1), Article 346. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-026-00716-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-026-00716-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-026-00716-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44288-026-00716-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> groundwater, GIS, remote sensing, Analytical Hierarchy Process, Mahoba district, Uttar Pradesh, Bundelkhand, water scarcity, hydrogeology, lineament density, Landsat 8, multi-criteria decision analysis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">233930</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
