<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bridge scour &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/bridge-scour/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 01:51:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Climate Change Could Scour Away 80 Percent More Riverbed Beneath a Vital Indian Bridge</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/climate-change-could-scour-away-80-percent-more-riverbed-beneath-a-vital-indian-bridge/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 01:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bed shear stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge scour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate-related infrastructure vulnerability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMIP6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental monitoring of river systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[erosion prediction models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flood risk assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geomorphology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HEC-RAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydraulic engineering challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydraulic modelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impacts of high-emissions scenarios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian infrastructure safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure vulnerability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riverbed erosion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupnarayan River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sediment motion physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sediment transport under climate stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSP585]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SWaT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=256918</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new modelling study projects that climate-driven increases in flow energy could deepen pier scour at India's Kolaghat Bridge by about 80 percent by 2100, pushing foundation safety below code thresholds.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beneath the piers of the Kolaghat Bridge, where the Rupnarayan River winds through the peri-urban heartland of eastern India, a slow and largely invisible threat is gathering force. New research published in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment suggests that by the end of this century, under a high-emissions future, the riverbed around the bridge&#8217;s foundations could be carved out by roughly 80 percent more than today&#8217;s scour depths, eroding the safety margin that keeps the structure standing. The study, led by Arnab Ghosh of Jadavpur University with Moumita Kundu of Vidyasagar University and Ellora Padhi of IIT Roorkee, is among the first to trace a complete, quantified chain from global climate projections down to the centimetre-scale physics of sediment motion around a bridge pier in a basin where measured data are notoriously scarce.</p>
<p>The problem the researchers set out to solve is one that haunts hydraulic engineers across the developing world. Bridge scour, the removal of sediment from around foundations by flowing water, is the leading cause of bridge collapse worldwide, and its severity depends on river discharge, sediment load, and channel geometry. Yet most design codes still assume that the statistics of future floods will resemble those of the past, an assumption famously challenged in 2008 when hydrologists declared that stationarity is dead. In data-scarce tropical basins like the Rupnarayan, where gauge records are short and sparse, quantifying how climate change will alter the forces acting on critical infrastructure has remained poorly constrained. The team&#8217;s answer was to build a modelling pipeline that squeezes usable engineering numbers out of limited observations.</p>
<p>At the top of the pipeline sits a high-resolution global climate model, the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model version 1.2 Higher Resolution, known as MPI-ESM1-2-HR. Raw global model output is too coarse and too biased to drive a local river model, so the researchers downscaled and bias-corrected the projections before feeding them into the Soil and Water Assessment Tool, a widely used watershed model that simulates how rainfall becomes runoff and sediment. The calibration was strong: the coupled model achieved a Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency of 0.90 and a coefficient of determination of 0.86 for discharge, figures that indicate the simulated river flows track the observed record closely. That performance matters, because every downstream estimate of scour depends on the credibility of the flow and sediment series entering the hydraulic model.</p>
<p>To bracket the range of possible futures, the team ran three Shared Socioeconomic Pathways: the moderate SSP245, the intermediate SSP370, and the fossil-fuel-intensive SSP585. The observed record from 1960 to 2020 shows no significant trend in the basin&#8217;s hydrology, but the projections diverge sharply from that historical baseline. Under SSP585, mean annual temperature rises by 1.31 degrees Celsius and mean annual rainfall increases by 22.1 percent by 2100. Those shifts translate into altered river flow regimes and sediment delivery, which the researchers propagated through a two-dimensional Hydrologic Engineering Center River Analysis System model, HEC-RAS 2D, to compute water-surface elevations, energy gradients, and bed shear stress for floods with return periods ranging from 2 to 100 years.</p>
<p>The hydraulic results reveal a consistent intensification of the forces that move sediment. Across the three-scenario comparison, critical shear stress and the energy gradient at the Kolaghat Bridge increase by 11 to 18 percent, with the MPI-ESM1-2-HR-driven projections clustering around 15 percent. Bed shear stress is the fundamental quantity in sediment transport: it describes the drag exerted by moving water on the channel bed, and when it exceeds the critical threshold for the bed material, grains begin to move. A higher energy gradient means steeper, more energetic flow, and a higher critical shear stress at the site means the river is pushing harder against its bed precisely where the bridge foundations are anchored.</p>
<p>The most striking number in the study comes from applying the HEC-18 procedure, the standard method of the U.S. Federal Highway Administration for evaluating scour at bridges. Total pier scour at the Kolaghat Bridge, projected under the high-emissions pathway, grows from approximately 6.07 metres to approximately 10.93 metres, an increase of about 80 percent. Pier scour develops when flowing water accelerates around a pier, forming horseshoe vortices at the bed that excavate a hole around the foundation. The deeper that hole becomes, the less of the pile remains embedded in competent material, and the smaller the reserve of safety against collapse. According to the study, the projected scour would diminish the foundation safety margin below the code threshold, a finding that converts an abstract climate statistic into a concrete engineering liability.</p>
<p>Paradoxically, the same simulations point to a second, opposite hazard. The projected water-surface elevations show reduced high-frequency variability, which the researchers interpret as a signal of increased sedimentation, channel narrowing, and a rise in overall channel sinuosity from 1.08 to 1.67. A sinuosity increase of that magnitude describes a river meandering more sharply through its floodplain, reshaping its course over decades. Sedimentation and narrowing can raise flood levels for a given discharge, while the shifting thalweg, the deepest line of the channel, can direct erosive flow toward piers that were designed for a different channel alignment. The bridge, in other words, faces threats from both directions: stronger scour during floods and a progressively less stable channel around it.</p>
<p>What makes the study methodologically significant is that it accomplishes this assessment in a basin with almost no dedicated monitoring infrastructure. The authors combined openly available bias-corrected CMIP6 climate projections, published by Mishra and colleagues on Zenodo, with satellite-derived terrain data and standard public modelling tools, creating a replicable template for other data-scarce rivers. The three-scenario, three-model comparison also gives engineers a sense of uncertainty: the 11 to 18 percent spread in shear stress intensification reflects how different scenario pathways and model configurations propagate through the chain. Similar physics-based approaches have been applied to regional bridge scour risk in the United States and to national scour assessments in Sweden, but applications to tropical, monsoon-dominated, peri-urban basins in South Asia have been rare, despite the region&#8217;s dense inventory of aging river crossings.</p>
<p>The practical implications extend well beyond a single bridge. The authors argue that their results make a clear case for climate-adjusted hydraulic design loads, meaning that new structures and retrofits should be sized not on historical flood statistics but on projected future flows and shear stresses. They also recommend regular bathymetric monitoring, repeated surveys of the riverbed depth around foundations, so that scour can be tracked as it develops rather than discovered after the fact, together with planned dredging to manage sediment accumulation. For the Kolaghat Bridge, which carries traffic across a working river in a densely populated corridor of West Bengal, such monitoring could mean the difference between a scheduled intervention and an emergency.</p>
<p>More broadly, the study is a reminder that climate change does not only arrive as floods and droughts; it arrives as altered physics in the beds of rivers, working silently on the foundations of the built world. A warming atmosphere loads more moisture into monsoon systems, reshaping discharge regimes and sediment budgets in ways that standard design manuals, written for a stationary climate, never anticipated. As extreme rainfall intensifies across South Asia, the modelling chain demonstrated here, from downscaled Earth system projections through watershed simulation to two-dimensional hydraulics and scour analysis, offers a way for engineers in data-poor regions to see that hidden stress coming, and to reinforce their infrastructure before the river quietly undermines it.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Climate change impacts on bridge pier scour and river channel morphology in the data-scarce Rupnarayan basin, India</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Climate-induced hydraulic stress and geomorphological changes: an assessment of vulnerability of critical river infrastructure in the data-scarce basin, India</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Ghosh, A., Kundu, M., &amp; Padhi, E. (2026). Climate-induced hydraulic stress and geomorphological changes: an assessment of vulnerability of critical river infrastructure in the data-scarce basin, India. <em>Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 198</em>(11), Article 1175. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-026-16013-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-026-16013-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-026-16013-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10661-026-16013-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> bridge scour, climate change, HEC-RAS, SWAT, CMIP6, Rupnarayan River, bed shear stress, hydraulic modelling, infrastructure vulnerability, SSP585, India, geomorphology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">256918</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wireless Tracking Particles Offer a New Way to Watch Flood Scour in Real Time</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/wireless-tracking-particles-offer-a-new-way-to-watch-flood-scour-in-real-time/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 10:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge scour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge scour damage detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disaster risk reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field demonstration of flood scour monitoring systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field deployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flood monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hazardous flood environment monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydraulic engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative flood risk assessment tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural hazards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real-time monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real-time sediment tracking in rivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote broadcast of underwater signals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote sensing of hydraulic structures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riverbed erosion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sediment movement detection during floods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sediment transport.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sensors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transient bed elevation measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underwater wireless tracking technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless flood scour monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless sensor particles for flood analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless tracking particles]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=222026</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study demonstrates that wireless tracking particles embedded in a riverbed can activate during sediment mobilization and transmit real-time scour hazard signals during natural floods.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When a major flood surges down a river, some of the most dangerous damage happens out of sight, beneath the water&#8217;s surface, where fast-moving currents dig away at the riverbed around bridge piers and other hydraulic structures. This process, known as scour, is one of the leading causes of bridge failure during extreme events, yet it remains notoriously difficult to observe while it is actually happening. Direct inspection is impossible under hazardous flood conditions, and many conventional monitoring techniques either cannot survive the violent environment or fail to capture the rapid, transient changes in bed elevation that occur as a flood peak passes. A new study published in the journal Natural Hazards presents a fresh approach to this long-standing problem: instrumented wireless tracking particles that lie dormant in the riverbed until sediment begins to move, at which point they spring to life and broadcast signals that can be detected remotely.</p>
<p>The research, carried out by Han-Chung Yang of the Department of Marine Leisure Management at National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology in Taiwan, describes the development of the system from laboratory bench testing through to a field demonstration at a flood-prone bridge site. The core idea is elegantly simple. Rather than trying to measure scour depth from a fixed instrument mounted on a bridge pier, the approach embeds small sensor-equipped particles directly within the bed material itself. Under stable conditions, these particles remain inactive, conserving their energy and staying silent. But when a flood mobilizes the sediment and the bed begins to erode, the particles are activated and begin transmitting wireless signals. Detecting those signals from a remote receiver provides a timely and unambiguous indication that scour-related bed disturbance is underway.</p>
<p>This event-triggered design addresses one of the fundamental challenges of scour monitoring: power and survivability. Fixed instrumentation such as sonar, fiber Bragg grating sensors, piezoelectric rods, and vibration-based devices has been explored extensively in the literature, and reviews of bridge scour monitoring techniques document both their promise and their limitations. Many of these systems must operate continuously in an environment that is hostile to electronics, subject to immersion, impact from debris, and enormous hydraulic forces during floods. By contrast, the wireless tracking particles only need to function at the precise moment when the riverbed is being disturbed, which is exactly when the hazard information is most valuable and when other instruments are most likely to be overwhelmed or destroyed.</p>
<p>The concept builds on a longer lineage of sediment-tracking methods in river research. Traditional scour chains and painted tracer stones have been used for decades to estimate bedload transport and bed degradation, but they must be recovered and examined after the event, offering no real-time information. Earlier work on wireless tracer systems for riverbed scour monitoring, including prior applications aimed at disaster warning, laid the groundwork for the present study. What distinguishes the new work is its progression through a complete development cycle: laboratory verification of the essential system functions, followed by deployment in a natural river during an actual flood, demonstrating that the technology can graduate from controlled experiments to genuine field conditions.</p>
<p>In the laboratory phase, the researcher subjected the instrumented particles to tests designed to verify the basic functionality that any field-worthy device must possess. Two critical properties were examined: waterproofing and activation reliability. Waterproofing is obviously essential for a device that must survive burial in a saturated riverbed and then exposure to full flood flows, and any breach would likely render the electronics inoperative. Activation reliability is equally important, because the entire value of the system depends on the particles waking up precisely when sediment mobilization occurs. A particle that fails to activate during a scour event produces a false negative, silently missing the very hazard it was designed to detect, while one that activates spuriously would undermine confidence in the signals it sends. The laboratory tests confirmed that the system could perform these basic functions as intended.</p>
<p>With laboratory validation in hand, the study moved to its most demanding test: a field deployment at a bridge site with a known history of flood exposure. The particles were embedded in the riverbed, and the monitoring system was left in place to await natural flood conditions. When a flood event eventually occurred, the system demonstrated that it could operate under real-world conditions, capturing signals associated with scour-related bed disturbance during the event. The author is careful to note that the field dataset is limited, and the demonstration was intended to establish feasibility and operability rather than to produce a comprehensive characterization of scour at the site. Even so, the confirmation that wireless signals from mobilized bed particles can be detected during a natural flood represents a meaningful milestone for the technique.</p>
<p>The significance of this demonstration becomes clearer when set against the broader context of scour hazard. Bridges founded in erodible riverbeds face the risk that floodwaters excavate the material around their foundations, undermining them until they fail. Forensic investigations of flood-induced bridge failures have shown how rapidly such failures can unfold, and probabilistic risk assessments in countries such as the United Kingdom have highlighted the substantial economic exposure of transport networks to scour during floods. National guidelines in the United Kingdom and Italy have moved toward risk-based assessment of hydraulic actions on bridges, and researchers have proposed adaptive water-level thresholds and machine-learning approaches for scour risk management. All of these frameworks depend on having some form of observational data, and the scarcity of real-time measurements during actual floods has long been a weak link in the chain from monitoring to warning to response.</p>
<p>The wireless particle approach offers a practical and flexible complement to existing methods. Because the particles are distributed within the bed rather than fixed to a structure, they can be placed at locations where scour is expected to develop, such as upstream of piers or along approach embankments, and their deployment does not require attaching hardware to the bridge itself. The remote detection of their signals means that personnel do not need to be physically present at a hazardous site during an event. The system&#8217;s flexibility also suggests that it could be adapted to different site conditions and scaled according to the level of risk at a given structure, providing an option for bridges where the cost or complexity of conventional fixed instrumentation is prohibitive.</p>
<p>The study&#8217;s limitations are acknowledged openly by its author. A single field deployment with a limited dataset cannot establish how the system performs across the full range of river types, sediment sizes, and flood magnitudes that scour monitoring must ultimately cover. Questions about detection range, signal propagation through water and sediment, particle recovery and reuse, and long-term durability in the bed all remain subjects for further work. The author notes that all data will be available on reasonable request, which may support subsequent evaluations by other research groups. The research was supported by the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan, and the author thanks Dr. Chih-Chiang Su and Professor Shan-Cheng Pan for their contributions to the work.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, the trajectory of the research, from laboratory development to a successful demonstration during a natural flood, illustrates how distributed, event-activated sensing could reshape the way engineers watch one of the most elusive hazards in hydraulic engineering. As climate-driven extreme events intensify and aging bridge stocks face growing hydraulic loads, tools that can deliver timely, ground-truth evidence of bed disturbance during the critical hours of a flood will only grow in importance. Wireless tracking particles, by turning the riverbed&#8217;s own sediment into a network of silent sentinels that report only when the bed is on the move, offer a promising new instrument in the effort to protect bridges and the communities that depend on them.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Real-time monitoring of flood-induced riverbed scour at bridges using wireless tracking particles</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Monitoring flood-induced scour hazards using wireless tracking particles: from laboratory development to field demonstration</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Yang, H.-C. (2026). Monitoring flood-induced scour hazards using wireless tracking particles: from laboratory development to field demonstration. <em>Natural Hazards, 122</em>(20), Article 655. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-026-08422-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-026-08422-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-026-08422-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11069-026-08422-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> bridge scour, wireless tracking particles, flood monitoring, riverbed erosion, natural hazards, hydraulic engineering, sediment transport, real-time monitoring, sensors, disaster risk reduction, bridge safety, field deployment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">222026</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scouring Floods and Earthquakes Combine to Lift Bridge Foundations, Study Warns</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/scouring-floods-and-earthquakes-combine-to-lift-bridge-foundations-study-warns/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 01:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge foundation weakening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge pile uplift risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge scour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cohesionless soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earthquake engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthquake-induced foundation failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flood and earthquake combined hazards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flood and seismic risk mitigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flood-induced scour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fragility curves for bridge foundations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housner intensity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-hazard assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pile uplift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pile-cap rotation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pile-group foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pile-group foundation stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probabilistic risk assessment in earthquake engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probabilistic seismic demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regression surrogate model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seismic fragility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seismic fragility analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seismic ground motion effects on bridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sensitivity analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil-structure interaction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=211926</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new probabilistic study shows that flood scour can leave bridge pile-group foundations with an 82 percent likelihood of seismically induced uplift under design-level ground shaking, with pile length emerging as the most influential protective factor.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When rivers flood, they do more than rise. The fast-moving water scours away the sediment that surrounds the foundations of bridges, leaving piles and pile caps more exposed than their designers ever intended. If an earthquake then strikes a bridge in this weakened state, a dangerous and poorly understood failure mode can emerge: the entire pile-group foundation can rock, rotate, and even begin to lift out of the ground. A new study published in the Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering by Jingcheng Wang, Hao Luo, Xiaowei Wang, and Yin Gu, researchers at Fuzhou University and Tongji University in China, has for the first time put hard probabilities on that uplift risk, producing fragility curves that tell engineers just how likely pile uplift becomes at any given level of ground shaking.</p>
<p>The concept at the heart of the paper is seismic uplift fragility, defined as the conditional probability that pile uplift will occur given a particular ground motion intensity measure. Fragility analysis is a cornerstone of modern earthquake engineering because it converts the messy, uncertain physics of soil-structure interaction into probabilistic statements that can feed directly into risk assessment and design codes. Previous research had established that scour removes overburden soil around the pile cap, amplifies pile-cap rotations during shaking, and can trigger uplift of the piles themselves. But the authors note that the seismic uplift behavior of scoured pile-group foundations had never been probabilistically quantified, leaving a significant gap in multi-hazard bridge assessment.</p>
<p>To close that gap, the team built an extensive numerical modeling campaign. They established 49 archetype bridge configurations by varying twelve structural and geotechnical parameters, including pile length, pile spacing, axial load ratio, and the longitudinal reinforcement ratio of the piles. The bridges were founded in cohesionless soils, meaning sandy, non-clayey sediments of exactly the kind that scour attacks most aggressively and that are common beneath river and coastal crossings. Each archetype was subjected to suites of ground motions, and the resulting simulations were mined for the quantities that best track uplift behavior.</p>
<p>A central technical contribution of the study is the careful selection of the response metrics used in the probabilistic demand models. The researchers systematically compared candidate engineering demand parameters and intensity measures, and concluded that the peak rotation of the pile cap is the optimal engineering demand parameter for quantifying uplift, while the Housner intensity, a measure based on the energy content of the ground motion, is the optimal intensity measure. Crucially, they found that pile-cap rotation is more efficient and more practical than the pile cap&#8217;s lateral displacement for characterizing uplift demand. Rotation, it turns out, directly captures the rocking mechanism that precedes uplift, whereas lateral displacement conflates rocking with sliding and bending responses, diluting the statistical relationship.</p>
<p>With demand quantified, the team then turned to capacity. Uplift capacity models were derived from the pile-cap rotations at the onset of uplift, effectively defining the rotation threshold beyond which part of the pile group begins to pull free of the surrounding soil. When a rocking foundation reaches this point, load redistributes to the remaining compressed piles, soil resistance on the uplifted side vanishes, and the energy dissipation and recentering behavior of the foundation change fundamentally. Combining the probabilistic demand models with these capacity models yielded the study&#8217;s headline output: seismic uplift fragility curves for scoured pile-group foundations in cohesionless soils.</p>
<p>The numbers are sobering. For the base bridge model, the probability of uplift reaches 82 percent under a seismic hazard level associated with a 475-year return period, the design-level event around which many modern seismic codes are organized. In other words, a bridge whose foundations have been scoured has a very high likelihood of experiencing pile uplift when struck by an earthquake of the magnitude engineers already plan for. Because uplift initiates the transition from a ductile rocking response toward potentially uncontrolled foundation movement, an 82 percent probability at the design event represents a serious vulnerability, particularly for the aging river and coastal bridges that dominate many transportation networks.</p>
<p>The parametric analysis that followed is where the study becomes most directly useful to practitioners. The fragility decreases as pile length increases, as pile spacing increases, and as the axial load ratio rises, while it increases as the longitudinal reinforcement ratio of the piles decreases. Among all the parameters examined, pile length was identified as the single most influential factor. Each of these trends has an intuitive physical basis. Longer piles provide deeper embedment and greater resistance to pullout. Wider spacing reduces the overlapping stress zones between adjacent piles, letting each pile mobilize more of the surrounding soil. Higher axial load on the foundation provides a stabilizing, self-weight-driven resistance to rocking and uplift. Conversely, less longitudinal reinforcement weakens the capacity of individual piles to sustain the tension that develops during rocking, making uplift and its consequences more damaging.</p>
<p>These findings resonate with a broader body of experimental work on rocking foundations. Quasi-static tests and shaking table studies by the same research group and by others in recent years have shown that scoured pile-group foundations exhibit distinctive uplift behavior and energy dissipation mechanisms, and that rocking can sometimes even be harnessed as a deliberate design strategy when the foundation is detailed to recenter after shaking. The new study adds the probabilistic layer that such experimental work lacks, translating deterministic observations into fragility statements that can be integrated into regional risk models, resilience assessments, and retrofit prioritization for bridge stocks exposed to both flood scour and seismic hazard.</p>
<p>Recognizing that running full nonlinear finite element simulations of 49 archetype bridges is impractical for routine design offices, the authors also distilled their results into practical tools. They established and validated multivariate linear regression models that allow rapid estimation of uplift fragility from the key design parameters, without the need for expensive simulation. This surrogate modeling approach mirrors a wider trend in earthquake engineering, in which machine-learned and regression-based approximations of physics-based analyses are used to bring probabilistic assessment within reach of everyday engineering workflows. For a bridge engineer wondering whether a scour-critical crossing needs longer piles, wider spacing, or enhanced reinforcement, the regression models offer a first-order answer in seconds.</p>
<p>The broader significance of the work lies in its treatment of concurrent hazards. Flood-induced scour and earthquakes are usually assessed separately, yet they are physically coupled in ways that can dramatically worsen outcomes. Scour weakens exactly the soil-foundation system that must resist seismic demands, and climate-driven changes in flood frequency suggest that more bridges will spend more of their service lives with compromised foundations. By delivering the first probabilistic quantification of seismic uplift fragility for scoured pile-group foundations in cohesionless soils, the Fuzhou University and Tongji University team has given the engineering community both a warning and a toolkit: multi-hazard assessment is not optional for river and coastal bridges, and the levers that most reduce uplift risk, above all pile length, are already in the hands of designers.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Seismic uplift fragility analysis of scour-affected bridge pile-group foundations in cohesionless soils</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Seismic uplift fragility of scoured bridge pile-group foundations in cohesionless soils</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Wang, J., Luo, H., Wang, X., &amp; Gu, Y. (2026). Seismic uplift fragility of scoured bridge pile-group foundations in cohesionless soils. <em>Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-026-02686-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-026-02686-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-026-02686-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10518-026-02686-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> bridge scour, pile-group foundation, seismic fragility, pile uplift, cohesionless soils, Housner intensity, pile-cap rotation, probabilistic seismic demand, multi-hazard assessment, sensitivity analysis, regression surrogate model, earthquake engineering</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">211926</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
