<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>boron &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/boron/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 17:42:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Boron&#8217;s Hidden Geometry in Granite Melts Rewrites Isotope Rules for Ore Formation</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/borons-hidden-geometry-in-granite-melts-rewrites-isotope-rules-for-ore-formation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 17:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aluminum saturation index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aluminum saturation index in granites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boron isotope behavior in granitic melts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boron isotopes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boron siting in silicate melts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boron-10 and boron-11 isotope variations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experimental synthesis of haplogranite glasses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geochemical modeling of isotope rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geochemical tracers in mineral formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[granite melt composition and structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[granitic melts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haplogranite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implications for ore deposit formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isotope fractionation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isotopic fingerprints in mineralogy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magmatic fluids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NMR spectroscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ore deposits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pegmatites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of boron in crustal fluid movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silicate glasses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tourmaline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water content influence on melt chemistry]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=255169</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New NMR experiments on synthetic granitic glasses show that the aluminum saturation index, not water or boron content, controls whether boron sits in trigonal or tetrahedral coordination, reshaping predictions of boron isotope fractionation between melts and fluids in ore-forming systems.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boron is one of the most useful chemical tracers in geology. Its two stable isotopes, boron-11 and boron-10, behave slightly differently in different chemical environments, and the resulting isotopic fingerprints can be read from minerals such as tourmaline to reconstruct how magmas released fluids, how ores formed, and how water moved through the crust. But the whole approach rests on a deceptively simple question: in what geometric arrangement does boron actually sit inside a silicate melt? A new experimental study published in the European Journal of Mineralogy by Jakob Rauscher of the GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences and colleagues provides the most systematic answer yet for granitic melts, and the answer turns out to depend almost entirely on one compositional parameter.</p>
<p>The team synthesized a suite of haplogranite glasses, simplified chemical analogues of natural granitic melts, spanning water contents from completely dry to 7.2 weight percent, boron concentrations between 1.5 and 5.2 weight percent B2O3, and a range of aluminum saturation index, or ASI, from 0.8 to 1.7. The ASI is the molar ratio of alumina to the sum of calcium, sodium, and potassium oxides, and it classifies granites as peraluminous when above one, metaluminous near one, and peralkaline below one. This ratio matters because in a melt, aluminum and boron compete for the same alkali elements that stabilize different structural units. The researchers then probed the local environment of boron in each quenched glass using boron-11 magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy at Ruhr-Universität Bochum, a technique that distinguishes trigonal, threefold-coordinated BO3 groups from tetrahedral, fourfold-coordinated BO4 groups by their characteristic resonance signals.</p>
<p>The result was strikingly one-dimensional. Within the studied range, the first-order control on boron coordination was the ASI value, with water content and boron concentration playing only secondary roles. Every glass with an ASI above 1.1, regardless of how wet or boron-rich it was, contained almost exclusively trigonal boron, with tetrahedral boron never exceeding 7 percent. In contrast, glasses with lower ASI values showed a steady and dramatic rise in tetrahedral boron, reaching a maximum of 90 percent in a sample with an ASI of about 0.8. The explanation lies in the melt&#8217;s network chemistry: converting trigonal boron to tetrahedral boron requires non-bridging oxygens and charge-balancing cations, and in strongly peraluminous melts all available alkalis are consumed stabilizing AlO4 units, leaving nothing to support BO4 formation.</p>
<p>The study also revealed a pattern familiar from decades of research on industrial borate glasses. Plotting the amount of tetrahedral boron against total alkali concentration showed negligible BO4 below about 7.5 weight percent alkalis, a rise to a maximum of roughly 2.5 weight percent tetrahedral boron at 9 to 9.5 weight percent alkalis, and then a decline at higher alkali contents. This echoes the classic boron anomaly described by Bray and O&#8217;Keefe in the 1960s, in which adding alkalis to borate glass first increases and then suppresses tetrahedral boron. Its appearance in hydrous aluminosilicate compositions suggests that the same structural competition operates in natural magmas, not just in laboratory glass formulations.</p>
<p>Water, long suspected of promoting tetrahedral boron through its hydroxyl groups acting as network modifiers, produced only ambiguous effects. There was a tendency toward higher tetrahedral boron in hydrous compared with anhydrous glasses at low ASI, consistent with earlier work on albite melts by Schmidt and colleagues. But the authors flag a serious confounding factor: quench rate. Water dramatically lowers melt viscosity and the glass transition temperature, and slower cooling is known to favor BO4 preservation in glass. Because the hydrous samples were synthesized in internally heated pressure vessels with slower quenching than the anhydrous melts fused in open crucibles, the apparent water effect may partly or wholly reflect cooling history rather than melt structure at magmatic temperatures. For low-ASI compositions, the anhydrous glasses may better approximate the true melt structure.</p>
<p>Boron concentration itself showed a limited capacity to drive tetrahedral coordination. The maximum tetrahedral proportion of 90 percent occurred in a relatively boron-poor sample with about 1.7 weight percent B2O3, while a compositionally similar sample containing 5.1 weight percent B2O3 reached only 49 percent. Likewise, among near-metaluminous samples, the boron-poorer glass reached 54 percent tetrahedral boron while its boron-richer counterpart managed only 20 percent. The interpretation is that melts with ASI below one have a finite supply of non-bridging oxygens to support BO4 groups; once that capacity is saturated, additional boron simply joins the network as trigonal units.</p>
<p>The findings align well with the sparse existing data on natural volcanic glasses. Two earlier NMR studies of peraluminous Italian rhyolites by Tonarini and colleagues and by Slejko and colleagues found 75 to 92 percent trigonal boron, matching the new experimental results for ASI values above 1.1. This convergence matters enormously for isotope geochemistry, because boron isotope fractionation between phases is governed by their coordination environments. In neutral to acidic aqueous fluids, boron occurs dominantly as trigonal B(OH)3 across the pressure, temperature, and pH conditions typical of crustal rocks, as established by Raman spectroscopy experiments from Schmidt&#8217;s group. If both the melt and the fluid host boron in trigonal coordination, there should be little if any isotopic fractionation between them.</p>
<p>That conclusion carries direct implications for interpreting ore deposits. Peraluminous granites, formed by partial melting of aluminous sedimentary rocks in orogenic belts, are closely associated worldwide with pegmatites and with tin, tungsten, lithium, uranium, niobium, and tantalum mineralization, and they are commonly rich in tourmaline. Geologists have used tourmaline&#8217;s boron isotope composition to test whether fluid exsolution from granite occurred, but existing experimental constraints on melt-fluid fractionation conflict badly, with some studies predicting around minus 7 per mil at 700 degrees Celsius and others predicting less than 1 per mil at similar temperatures. The new NMR data suggest that for peraluminous systems, the small fractionation values are more plausible, since both phases would hold boron in trigonal coordination, a view supported by direct tourmaline-melt partitioning experiments of Cheng and colleagues that found differences below 1 per mil even at 660 degrees Celsius.</p>
<p>For metaluminous and peralkaline melts, the picture changes fundamentally. Combining the experimentally derived relationship between ASI and tetrahedral boron with published ab initio calculations of isotope fractionation factors for trigonal and tetrahedral boron species, the team built a predictive model linking the melt-fluid boron isotope fractionation to melt ASI and temperature. The model predicts fractionations of minus 4 to minus 7 per mil at 730 and 530 degrees Celsius respectively for a granite with an ASI of 0.8, and shows that assuming 30 percent versus zero percent tetrahedral boron in the fluid shifts the predicted fractionation by 1 to 3 per mil depending on temperature. The authors note that the strongly peraluminous Macusani rhyolite of Peru, with an ASI of 1.3, should show near-zero fractionation by this model, in tension with a reported experimental value of minus 7.5 per mil, and they point out that spectroscopic confirmation of boron coordination in that glass remains an outstanding test.</p>
<p>What emerges is a practical tool: measure or estimate a granite melt&#8217;s aluminum saturation index, and its boron coordination, and hence its likely isotope behavior during fluid exsolution, can be predicted. For the peraluminous magmas that generate many of the world&#8217;s strategic metal deposits, boron isotopes in tourmaline and fluids will record little fractionation from their parent melts. For the rarer metaluminous and peralkaline systems, the isotopic contrast between melt and fluid should be substantial and temperature-dependent, opening a sharper window on degassing and ore-forming processes. A single structural ratio, hidden in the atomic geometry of the melt, now stands as the key to reading boron&#8217;s isotopic messages from the deep crust.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Boron coordination and isotope fractionation in granitic melts</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Boron coordination in haplogranite glasses</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Rauscher, J., Fechtelkord, M., Jahn, S., Michaud, J. A.-S., Mothan, D., Sieber, M. J., Trumbull, R. B., Wilke, F. D. H., Wilke, M., &amp; Wunder, B. (2026). Boron coordination in haplogranite glasses. <em>European Journal of Mineralogy, 38</em>(4), 383-396. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ejm-38-383-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.5194/ejm-38-383-2026</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ejm-38-383-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.5194/ejm-38-383-2026</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> boron, haplogranite, NMR spectroscopy, granitic melts, aluminum saturation index, boron isotopes, isotope fractionation, tourmaline, pegmatites, ore deposits, silicate glasses, magmatic fluids</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">255169</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lab-grown pegmatite fluids reveal how lithium isotopes split between melt and vapor</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/lab-grown-pegmatite-fluids-reveal-how-lithium-isotopes-split-between-melt-and-vapor/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 01:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep Earth mineralogy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experimental petrology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fluid exsolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fluid-melt interaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green technology minerals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-temperature fluid-rock interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isotope fractionation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laboratory simulations of magmatic processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laser ablation ICP-MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithium and boron transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithium isotope fractionation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithium isotopes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magmatic fluids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pegmatite formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pegmatite mineralogy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pegmatites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rare metal concentration in pegmatites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rare-metal deposits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silicate melts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supercritical fluids]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=250997</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A novel laboratory setup separating two pegmatitic melts with a fluid phase shows that lithium isotopes fractionate between melt and fluid, with the fluid preferentially enriched in the heavier isotope lithium-7.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deep inside the Earth, some of the most extraordinary rocks on the planet are born from molten granite that cools far too quickly for its own good. Pegmatites, the coarse-crystallized cousins of ordinary granite, are the world&#8217;s great treasure chests of lithium, cesium, tantalum, and boron, elements that modern batteries and green technologies devour in ever-growing quantities. Yet the exact role that hot, pressurized fluids play in concentrating these rare metals during the final stages of pegmatite formation has remained one of the most contested questions in experimental petrology. Now a team of researchers at Leibniz University Hannover has built an ingenious laboratory experiment that traps this elusive process in a gold capsule, and their results, published in the European Journal of Mineralogy, deliver the first direct experimental demonstration that lithium isotopes fractionate between silicate melt and fluid at magmatic temperatures.</p>
<p>The study, led by Christian Ronny Singer together with Harald Behrens, Ingo Horn, Martin Oeser, Stefan Weyer, and François Holtz, tackles a problem that has frustrated geochemists for decades. When a pegmatite-forming melt becomes saturated with water, a separate supercritical fluid exsolves from the magma. This fluid can, in principle, ferry incompatible elements such as lithium and boron through the crystallizing rock, potentially enriching pockets of the pegmatite to ore-grade concentrations. Fluid inclusions trapped in natural pegmatite minerals have been reported with lithium concentrations of up to 12,000 to 16,000 ppm and boron concentrations reaching more than 10 weight percent as B2O3, hinting at just how metal-rich these fluids can become. But measuring what actually happens at the interface between melt and fluid, on the timescales and at the temperatures where it happens, has been nearly impossible.</p>
<p>The Hannover team&#8217;s solution is elegantly simple in concept and fiendishly demanding in execution. They loaded a gold capsule with two synthetic glass cylinders: a blue-tinted source melt, rich in lithium and boron and modeled on a late-stage pegmatite composition containing 1.7 percent Li2O and 2.5 percent B2O3, and a chemically similar sink melt that was initially almost free of both elements. Between the two cylinders they packed a coarse-grained porous filling of crushed quartz or zircon, saturated with an aqueous chloride solution. Because the two melts never touched, any lithium or boron that appeared in the sink melt must have traveled through the fluid phase alone, exactly mimicking the way elements would move through an exsolved fluid in a cooling pegmatite dyke. The capsules were then held at 850 degrees Celsius and 100 megapascals in a rapid-heat, rapid-quench cold-seal pressure vessel for durations ranging from one hour to four days.</p>
<p>The analytical challenge was formidable. Lithium and boron concentrations spanning more than three orders of magnitude, from a few parts per million to over 8,000 ppm, were mapped using femtosecond laser ablation coupled to sector field ICP mass spectrometry, while isotope ratios were measured with a multicollector ICP-MS setup that switched detector configurations depending on concentration. The team even manufactured synthetic fluid inclusions inside pre-treated quartz cylinders placed within the packing material, freezing and ablating them to glimpse the composition of the fluid itself during the run. Fluid inclusion analyses from the first experiment yielded average concentrations of about 419 ppm lithium and 532 ppm boron, values that turned out to be surprisingly low compared with what equilibrium partitioning models predicted.</p>
<p>That surprise became one of the study&#8217;s central findings: the transport of lithium and boron through the fluid was remarkably inefficient. In the sink melts, lithium concentrations generally stayed below 130 ppm and boron rarely exceeded 600 ppm even near the fluid-melt interface, despite the source melt containing thousands of times more of both elements. The amounts transferred increased steadily with experimental duration, pointing to a sluggish, kinetically limited mobilization of the elements from the source. The culprit, the researchers conclude, is the small reactive surface area between melt and fluid. In the capsule, the melt crept only slowly into the pore spaces of the mineral packing, so the fluid contacted far less melt than it would in nature, where fluid bubbles nucleate throughout the magma and coalesce into an interconnected network. In a sense, the experiments demonstrate the importance of the reactive interface by showing what happens when it is starved.</p>
<p>Several other parameters left their fingerprints on the results. Experiments run under a thermal gradient, with the source end at roughly 830 degrees Celsius and the sink end near 770 degrees, transferred more lithium and boron than isothermal runs, a pattern the authors attribute to possible thermodiffusion, the Soret effect, or localized convection at the fluid-melt interface. The choice of packing material mattered too: quartz dissolved aggressively into the silica-undersaturated melts, polymerizing them and apparently promoting lithium release, whereas zircon proved nearly inert. An NaCl-bearing fluid appeared to enhance boron transport relative to a CsCl fluid, while the cesium-bearing fluid left both melts strongly enriched in cesium, consistent with published fluid-melt partition coefficients for that element.</p>
<p>The headline result, however, belongs to the isotopes. Both lithium and boron each have two stable isotopes, and the way their ratios shift during transport can encode the history of fluid-melt interaction. In the sink melts, the team measured δ7Li values ranging from roughly 4 to 23 per mil, consistently heavier than the source melt and, in some experiments, heavier than even the inherent signature of the sink glass itself. A conservative mixing model showed that these values cannot be explained by simple blending of source and sink compositions. Instead, the fluid must have been preferentially enriched in the heavier isotope, lithium-7, through equilibrium isotope fractionation between melt and fluid. The physical driver is coordination chemistry: in the silicate melt, lithium sits in tetrahedral coordination with oxygen, while in the low-density supercritical fluid it forms mostly neutral lithium-fluorine and lithium-chlorine complexes with lower coordination numbers. Heavy isotopes favor the phase with the stronger, lower-coordination bonding environment, and here that phase is the fluid.</p>
<p>Equally telling is what the team did not find. There was no evidence of kinetic isotope fractionation during transport through the fluid, the kind of effect that would enrich the sink in the lighter isotope-6 because it diffuses faster. The researchers attribute this to the short transport distance of about six centimeters and to the fact that lithium moves as a complex rather than a bare ion, making the relative mass difference between isotopic complexes negligible. The only hint of a kinetic effect appeared in the one-hour experiment, where a δ7Li gradient within the sink melt suggested that the lighter isotope had outrun the heavier one before isotopic equilibration could erase the signal. Boron, by contrast, showed no resolvable isotope fractionation at all, within an analytical uncertainty of about 4.7 per mil, likely because boron occupies trigonal coordination both in the melt and in the fluid as boric acid species, leaving little bonding-energy difference for isotopes to exploit.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most consequential insight is the decoupling of chemical and isotopic equilibration. The chemical exchange of lithium and boron between melt and fluid was demonstrably slow in the experiments, yet the lithium isotope ratios appear to have equilibrated rapidly at the interface. This means that lithium isotopes in pegmatite minerals may faithfully record the influence of an exsolved fluid even when the minerals themselves crystallized under strong disequilibrium, as is widely believed to occur in rapidly cooled, undercooled pegmatite melts. It gives geochemists a new degree of confidence when interpreting δ7Li values in pegmatite quartz, micas, and tourmalines as tracers of fluid activity.</p>
<p>The implications ripple outward to the real world of lithium exploration. Because the fluid preferentially carries the heavy isotope, fluids escaping a crystallizing pegmatite should drive the δ7Li of surrounding wall rocks upward while leaving the pegmatite itself isotopically lighter, a pattern that field studies in Tibet and elsewhere have already invoked to explain the light lithium isotope signatures of spodumene-bearing pegmatites. The experiments also confirm that in chloride-poor systems lithium remains compatible in the melt, so residual melts can keep enriching themselves in lithium even as fluid is lost, potentially pushing the melt toward supersaturation and the crystallization of spodumene or petalite. For a society betting its energy future on lithium, understanding how nature concentrates this element in the final throes of a cooling magma is more than an academic exercise, and this gold-capsule glimpse of fluid-melt handoff brings that understanding a decisive step closer.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Experimental investigation of lithium and boron transport and isotope fractionation between melt and fluid in pegmatitic systems</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> A novel experimental approach to investigate element transport and isotope fractionation of Li and B in pegmatitic systems during fluid–melt interaction</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Singer, C. R., Behrens, H., Horn, I., Oeser, M., Weyer, S., &amp; Holtz, F. (2026). A novel experimental approach to investigate element transport and isotope fractionation of Li and B in pegmatitic systems during fluid–melt interaction. <em>European Journal of Mineralogy, 38</em>(4), 497-518. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ejm-38-497-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.5194/ejm-38-497-2026</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ejm-38-497-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.5194/ejm-38-497-2026</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> pegmatites, lithium isotopes, boron, fluid-melt interaction, isotope fractionation, experimental petrology, fluid exsolution, rare-metal deposits, silicate melts, laser ablation ICP-MS, geochemistry, green energy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">250997</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tiny Boron Doses Supercharge Wheat Yields in Nepal&#8217;s Nitrogen-Hungry Fields</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/tiny-boron-doses-supercharge-wheat-yields-in-nepals-nitrogen-hungry-fields/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 01:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agricultural research in developing countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boosting wheat productivity with micronutrient application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crop yield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fertilizer guidelines for smallholder farmers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fertilizer recommendations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field study on wheat nutrient interaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of micronutrients on crop yields]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of soil chemistry on crop yields]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micronutrients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nepal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen fertilizer optimization for wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of boron in wheat production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil acidification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil fertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil fertility management in South Asian agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil nutrient deficiencies in Nepal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spikelet sterility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable agriculture practices in Nepal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat yield improvement in Nepal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=229959</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A two-year field trial in Dhading, Nepal, shows that combining nitrogen with small doses of boron boosts wheat grain yields by nearly half and cuts spikelet sterility by more than a third.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wheat feeds more of humanity than almost any other crop, supplying roughly a fifth of the calories consumed by more than a third of the world&#8217;s population. Yet in Nepal, one of the countries that depends on it most heavily, average yields have stubbornly lagged behind those of neighboring South Asian producers. The 2024/25 marketing year placed national production at an estimated 2.1 million metric tons, with an average productivity of just 2.92 tonnes per hectare. For researchers trying to understand why, the answer increasingly points below the ground: to soils that are quietly starved of the nutrients wheat needs most, and to fertilizer guidelines that were never designed for the specific fields where farmers actually work.</p>
<p>A new field study conducted in Dhading, Nepal, and published in BMC Agriculture, offers some of the clearest evidence yet that the solution lies not in any single nutrient but in the interaction between two of them. Prabin Ghimire and Janma Jaya Gairhe, both of the Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science at Tribhuvan University, spent two consecutive growing seasons testing how nitrogen and boron, applied alone and in combination, shaped the yield, fertility, and soil chemistry of a wheat crop. Their central finding is striking: when the two nutrients were applied together at the right rates, grain yields climbed to levels far above the national average, and a persistent reproductive failure known as wheat sterility fell dramatically.</p>
<p>The problem the researchers set out to address is both agronomic and chemical. Nitrogen is the macronutrient that drives vegetative growth, tillering, and biomass accumulation in wheat, and decades of research have confirmed that raising nitrogen inputs generally raises grain yields. But the relationship is not linear. Excessive nitrogen can trigger diminishing returns, nutrient leaching, soil acidification, and lodging, the structural collapse of top-heavy plants. Boron, by contrast, is a micronutrient required in tiny amounts, but its role is outsized: it is essential for pollen viability and fertilization, and its deficiency is directly linked to spikelet sterility, the failure of flowers to set grain. In Nepal, boron-deficient soils are widespread and have long been associated with outbreaks of wheat sterility that slash harvests without any visible disease.</p>
<p>What has been missing, the authors argue, is field-scale evidence of how these two nutrients behave together, particularly in soils where both are deficient. Baseline analysis of the experimental site in Dhading, a monsoon-influenced humid subtropical location classified as a Dystric Loamic Fluvisol, revealed total nitrogen at just 0.14 percent and boron at 0.21 parts per million, both below the critical thresholds for optimal wheat growth. Government fertilizer recommendations in Nepal are typically issued for broad agroecological zones, with little allowance for site-specific soil chemistry, seasonal variability, or local climate. That gap leaves farmers applying nutrients in proportions that may be agronomically wrong for their fields, wasting money and degrading soil in the process.</p>
<p>To test the interaction directly, the team ran a split-plot experiment across the 2020 and 2021 cropping seasons using the medium-maturity wheat variety BL3063, obtained from Nepal&#8217;s National Wheat Research Program. Main plots received nitrogen at 0, 80, 100, or 120 kilograms per hectare, applied as urea in three splits: half incorporated before sowing, a quarter at 30 days after sowing, and a quarter at 60 days. Subplots received boron at 0, 1, or 2 kilograms per hectare as a basal dose. The design was replicated three times, and the researchers analyzed their results with linear mixed-effects models that treated year and replication as random effects, allowing them to separate genuine treatment effects from environmental noise. Grain yields were standardized to 14 percent moisture, and plant tissue nitrogen was measured by the micro-Kjeldahl method at three key phenological stages: tillering, booting, and grain filling.</p>
<p>The results were unambiguous. Nitrogen application significantly increased grain yield, biological yield, and straw yield, with the highest grain yield, 8,143.89 kilograms per hectare, recorded at 120 kilograms of nitrogen per hectare. That figure represents a 49.3 percent increase over the unfertilized control, which yielded 5,455.87 kilograms per hectare, and it dwarfs Nepal&#8217;s national average of roughly 2.99 tonnes per hectare. Tissue nitrogen concentrations rose consistently with application rate at every growth stage, peaking during tillering, which the authors interpret as confirmation of a clear dose-specific and phenological response. Boron, meanwhile, delivered its own kind of magic: applying it significantly reduced spikelet sterility and improved grain yield, with the effect visible in both seasons.</p>
<p>The most compelling numbers emerged from the interaction analysis. The lowest sterility rate, 33.2 percent, occurred under the combined treatment of 120 kilograms of nitrogen and 2 kilograms of boron per hectare, a 35.9 percent reduction compared with the control treatment, which suffered 51.8 percent sterility. Notably, the regression analysis revealed a consistent negative relationship between applied boron and sterility across both years, and the statistical groupings showed that even the moderate dose of 1 kilogram per hectare significantly outperformed the control. The authors attribute the synergy to boron&#8217;s role in nitrogen metabolism: the micronutrient facilitates nitrogen uptake, supports protein synthesis, and ensures effective pollen viability and fertilization, thereby maximizing grain set precisely when nitrogen availability is at its highest.</p>
<p>The soil story is more complicated, and it carries a warning. Post-harvest analysis of the top 20 centimeters of soil showed that increasing nitrogen rates significantly reduced soil pH, with the acidification effect more pronounced in 2021 than in 2020. This is consistent with the well-documented chemistry of nitrification, in which ammonium-based fertilizers release hydrogen ions as soil microbes convert ammonium to nitrate. Total soil nitrogen did increase with higher application rates, indicating a genuine fertility gain, and boron availability responded strongly to boron treatments, though with notable year-to-year variation likely driven by environmental factors. Phosphorus and potassium levels remained largely unchanged. The authors suggest that liming may be needed to counteract long-term acidification, and they emphasize that balanced fertilization, rather than nitrogen alone, is the key to maintaining soil health over time.</p>
<p>The study is not without limitations, and the authors are candid about them. Two growing seasons cannot capture the full arc of soil fertility dynamics or climate variability, and only one wheat variety was tested, leaving open the question of whether other genotypes would respond similarly. Sterility, moreover, can also be driven by temperature fluctuations and drought stress, for which site-specific data were not available. Still, the stability of the grain yield response across both years, and the absence of a significant three-way interaction between year, nitrogen, and boron, suggest that the underlying biology is robust. The practical implications are immediate: micronutrients like boron deserve a formal place in national fertilizer recommendations, not as an afterthought but as a co-equal partner to nitrogen. For a country striving toward wheat self-sufficiency, the path forward may run through a nutrient most farmers have never measured, applied at rates measured in single kilograms rather than hundreds, working quietly in the pollen tubes of every wheat flower to turn nitrogen into grain.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Interactive effects of nitrogen and boron fertilization on wheat yield, spikelet sterility, and soil fertility in Nepal</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Nitrogen-boron in wheat: yield optimization and soil fertility in Nepal</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Ghimire, P., &amp; Gairhe, J. J. (2025). Nitrogen-boron in wheat: yield optimization and soil fertility in Nepal. <em>BMC Agriculture, 1</em>(1), Article 11. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s44399-025-00014-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s44399-025-00014-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s44399-025-00014-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s44399-025-00014-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> wheat, nitrogen, boron, spikelet sterility, soil fertility, soil acidification, nutrient management, fertilizer recommendations, Nepal, agronomy, crop yield, micronutrients</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">229959</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>China&#8217;s Boron Habit Revealed: Huge Imports, Tiny Recycling, Rising Stocks</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/chinas-boron-habit-revealed-huge-imports-tiny-recycling-rising-stocks/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sloane Callahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 00:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and manufacturing processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boron extraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boron lifecycle and recycling rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boron mud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boron stockpiles and resource management in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boron supply chain analysis in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boron usage in electric vehicle batteries and wind turbines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Challenges in boron recycling and sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China's boron import dependency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China's boron industry and trade data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dynamic material flow analysis of boron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental impact of boron consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[import dependence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in-use stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[material flow analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy implications for boron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Refining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resource policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Role of boron in advanced technologies and renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply chain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban mining]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=224526</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The first dynamic material flow analysis of boron in China reveals heavy import dependence, a recycling rate of just 1.37 percent, and a rapidly growing in-use stock of nearly one million tonnes.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boron rarely makes headlines, yet the quiet element with atomic number 5 sits behind windshields, smartphone components, electric vehicle batteries, nuclear reactor control rods, and the NdFeB magnets that spin inside wind turbines and EV motors. A new dynamic material flow analysis published in Environmental Challenges has, for the first time, mapped the complete life cycle of boron in China from 2004 to 2023, and the picture it paints is striking: a nation that consumes boron at industrial scale, imports more than 70 percent of it, and recycles almost none of it back into the supply chain.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Jingwei Hou and Yong Geng, applied dynamic material flow analysis (dMFA), a mass-conservation accounting framework that tracks every tonne of a substance through extraction, refining, manufacturing, use, and disposal. Their system boundary covered mainland China and divided the boron industry chain into seven stages: mining and beneficiation, refining and separation, smelting, fabrication, manufacture, use, and waste management and recycling. Thirty-eight boron-containing commodities were tracked, with trade data drawn from China Customs Yearbooks and the UN Comtrade database, production statistics from the U.S. Geological Survey and the CBC Metal database, and process parameters validated through field visits to major producers and ten face-to-face interviews with industry executives and technical personnel.</p>
<p>The methodological machinery is considerable. Process flows were calculated by multiplying production quantities by boron concentrations, losses were applied at each stage using documented loss rates, and the accumulation and retirement of boron in products was modeled with a Weibull probability distribution, the standard statistical tool for describing how products fail and exit service over time. To test robustness, the team ran a Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 iterations, assigning coefficients of variation of 5 percent to reliable official statistics and 10 percent to literature-derived parameters. The results showed uncertainty below 5 percent for imports, exports, and consumption, and 13 to 19 percent for end-of-life flows, narrow enough that the study&#8217;s central conclusions hold firm.</p>
<p>The headline numbers are sobering. Over the twenty-year period, net imported boron at the mining and refining stages reached 2,784 kilotonnes, while domestic extraction contributed only 1,026.7 kilotonnes. China&#8217;s reserves, ranked fifth globally at 9.1 million tonnes of boron trioxide equivalent, are concentrated in Qinghai and Liaoning provinces but suffer from low ore grades that make domestic mining economically punishing. Turkey, which holds 950 million tonnes of reserves, dominates the global market and supplied roughly half of China&#8217;s total boron imports, with borax, boron ores, boric acid, and boron oxides making up 99.5 percent of that bilateral trade. Such concentration in a single supplier exposes China to geopolitical, trade-policy, and natural-disaster risks.</p>
<p>Consumption tells its own story of transformation. Annual boron use climbed from 41.3 kilotonnes in 2004 to a peak of 161.8 kilotonnes in 2021, before easing to 94.6 kilotonnes in 2023 as upstream mining constraints bit. Glass, ceramics, and enamel products consistently absorbed more than 40 percent of total consumption, with the chemical industry, spanning disinfectants, flame retardants, and catalysts, taking another 24 percent. But the fastest growth came from emerging technologies: by 2020, new energy vehicles and batteries accounted for over 4 percent and 8 percent of consumption respectively, a share that seemed set to expand before supply bottlenecks curtailed it.</p>
<p>The losses along the chain are enormous. Refining borax generates roughly four tonnes of boron mud for every tonne of product, and China discharges about two million tonnes of this waste annually, with boron content of only 0.76 percent. Across the full period, total boron losses reached 1,757.1 kilotonnes, while just 24 kilotonnes were recycled, an overall recycling rate of approximately 1.37 percent. Chemical extraction from boron mud requires acid leaching with high reagent and energy costs and risks secondary pollution, so most recovery involves low-value physical processes such as sintering the mud into construction materials. By contrast, Turkey recovers more than 90 percent of boron from industrial wastes, a benchmark the authors argue China should urgently study.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, an invisible reservoir is quietly building. In-use boron stocks, the element embedded in products currently serving society, nearly doubled during the second decade of the study, rising from 502.5 kilotonnes in 2014 to 966.8 kilotonnes in 2023. Glass, ceramics, and enamel dominate this urban mine at 664.2 kilotonnes, followed by batteries, which grew from 25.7 to 68.7 kilotonnes over the decade, earthmoving machinery, glazed tiles, and aircraft. End-of-life flows, delayed by the roughly 16.5-year average lifespan of boron-containing products, entered rapid growth in the 2010s and reached 31 kilotonnes in 2023, signaling a secondary resource stream that current infrastructure is not equipped to capture.</p>
<p>The trade structure reveals a low-value trap. China imported 2,955.2 kilotonnes of boron over the period, dominated by raw and intermediate materials, then exported 1,257.4 kilotonnes of finished products, chiefly glass and ceramics, glazes, and boron steel, to 225 countries and regions, with Indonesia the largest buyer. Fabrication losses ran at roughly 20 percent, and the authors conclude that the whole boron industry chain remains low-value oriented, generating thin profits while imposing heavy environmental pressure. High-end products such as boron carbide, boron nitride, and rare earth borides are still largely manufactured in developed countries, and Chinese enterprises struggle to achieve large-scale production of these materials essential for energy, defense, and nuclear applications.</p>
<p>The policy prescriptions are concrete. The authors call for increased research and development investment and university-industry cooperation to crack the technological bottlenecks in high-end boron products and boron mud valorization, including promising but unconfirmed routes such as converting the waste into nuclear radiation shielding materials or fertilizers. They recommend a national boron information platform, national standards requiring retired boron-containing products to reach designated disassembly stations, and financial support for recycling enterprises. On supply security, they point to diversification through Chile, Russia, Peru, Argentina, Bolivia, and Kazakhstan, countries aligned with China&#8217;s Belt and Road frameworks and recent green minerals cooperation agreements. Economic instruments, including differentiated resource taxes tied to ore recovery rates, carbon taxes on energy-intensive operations, emission fees, and green labeling, round out the governance agenda.</p>
<p>What makes this study resonate beyond China is the method itself. dMFA has previously illuminated the metabolism of steel, aluminum, copper, rare earths, and dozens of critical metals, but boron, a nonmetallic critical material with extreme import dependence, had never received this treatment at national scale. As the world&#8217;s clean energy transition accelerates demand for every element that hardens steel, toughens glass, and steadies neutrons, the study warns that a country can dominate manufacturing yet remain dangerously exposed at the raw material frontier, and that the urban mines accumulating in its cities, currently leaking 790.7 kilotonnes of boron into the environment as waste, represent both an untapped opportunity and an unaddressed environmental burden.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Dynamic material flow analysis of boron flows, stocks, trade, and recycling in China from 2004 to 2023</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Uncovering the features of boron flows and stocks in China</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Hou, J., Geng, Y., Zhong, C., Gao, Z., &amp; Liu, S. (2026). Uncovering the features of boron flows and stocks in China. <em>Environmental Challenges, 25</em>, Article 101675. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2026.101675" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2026.101675</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2026.101675" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.envc.2026.101675</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> boron, material flow analysis, China, critical materials, recycling, supply chain, boron mud, in-use stocks, Turkey, import dependence, urban mining, resource policy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">224526</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Boron Allotrope Bends Like Metal and Conducts Like a Semiconductor</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/new-boron-allotrope-bends-like-metal-and-conducts-like-a-semiconductor/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 12:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced boron materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allotrope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B12 icosahedra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bandgap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boron allotrope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boron allotrope synthesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boron chemistry breakthroughs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boron material flexibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boron semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boron structural properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conductive boron materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[covalent bonding in boron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dislocation slip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductile boron allotrope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrical conductivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imma-B60 boron crystal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metastable materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-framework boron crystal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plasticity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sodium boride]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=210185</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Chemists have synthesized Imma-B60, an open-framework form of boron that conducts electricity seven orders of magnitude better than ordinary boron and can plastically deform by about 23 percent.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boron has long been one of the most stubborn elements on the periodic table. It is light, abundant, and chemically versatile, yet for decades the crystalline forms of pure boron that chemists could actually make have shared a frustrating pair of traits: they are extraordinarily hard and extraordinarily brittle, and they conduct electricity poorly. Now a team at Yanshan University in China, working with collaborators at several Chinese institutions, reports in Nature Chemistry the synthesis of a boron allotrope that breaks both rules at once. The new phase, designated Imma-B60, is a highly conductive, open-framework crystal that can be plastically deformed by roughly 23 percent, a level of ductility that is essentially unheard of for an elemental solid built from covalently bonded boron.</p>
<p>The achievement matters because it resolves a tension that has defined boron chemistry for more than half a century. The known allotropes, including the familiar beta-rhombohedral phase and the high-pressure gamma-B28 form, are built from B12 icosahedra, cage-like clusters of twelve boron atoms that lock the structure into rigid, three-dimensional networks. That architecture delivers hardness and, in some phases, semiconducting behavior, but it also means the material has no easy way to relieve stress. When a conventional boron crystal is loaded past its elastic limit, it cracks rather than bends. Achieving a single boron phase that is simultaneously a good electrical conductor and capable of plastic flow has therefore been an explicit goal, and until now an unmet one, in the field.</p>
<p>The route to Imma-B60 is as interesting as the material itself. Rather than trying to crystallize pure boron directly into the desired framework, the team used a two-step precursor strategy. First, they synthesized a sodium boride, Na4B60, under high-pressure and high-temperature conditions, growing crystals large enough for single-crystal X-ray diffraction. In this compound, sodium atoms occupy channels within a boron framework, acting as a kind of structural scaffold. In the second step, the researchers removed the sodium by degassing the crystals at around 900 degrees Celsius under high vacuum for 48 hours. What remained was a pure boron framework that inherited the geometry of its sodium-containing parent, an approach the authors describe as a powerful way to access metastable materials that cannot be reached by direct synthesis.</p>
<p>The structure that survives the sodium extraction is remarkable in its own right. Imma-B60 adopts an orthorhombic open framework in which B12 icosahedra are interconnected by triangular B3 units through a combination of two-center and three-center sigma bonds. This is not the dense, space-filling arrangement of ordinary boron; it is a porous, cage-like architecture more reminiscent of the open-framework clathrate forms of silicon, which themselves were synthesized by a comparable precursor-removal strategy. The team confirmed the structure through a combination of single-crystal and powder X-ray diffraction, Rietveld refinement, micro-electron diffraction, and scanning transmission electron microscopy, and they benchmarked the diffraction pattern against every reported and predicted boron phase to show that Imma-B60 is genuinely new.</p>
<p>The electronic properties are where the material begins to look transformative. Calculations and measurements show that Imma-B60 has a narrow bandgap of less than 0.2 electronvolts, far smaller than the gap in conventional boron phases. The measured electrical conductivity is approximately 9 times 10 to the 2 siemens per meter, which the authors note is seven orders of magnitude higher than that of beta-boron. In practical terms, a material that was previously an electrical near-insulator has been restructured, without changing its chemical composition, into something approaching a conducting semiconductor. The bonding analysis, performed with a solid-state adaptation of adaptive natural density partitioning, confirms that the framework is held together by predominantly sigma-type bonding, with the open topology leaving the electronic structure in a regime where charge transport becomes facile.</p>
<p>Equally striking is the mechanical behavior. Using in situ uniaxial compression of nanopillars carved from the crystals, oriented along a specific crystallographic direction, the researchers observed that Imma-B60 deforms plastically to strains of about 23 percent. The deformation proceeds through a dislocation-mediated slip mechanism, meaning that planes of atoms slide past one another along defined crystallographic pathways rather than the material shattering. Video recordings of the compression experiments show the nanopillars bending and shearing in a way that looks more like a metal than a covalent nonmetal. Nanoindentation measurements on both the precursor Na4B60 and the final B60 phase provided complementary hardness and elastic modulus data, placing the new material well outside the superhard-but-brittle envelope that has characterized boron to date.</p>
<p>The precursor strategy itself may prove to be the study&#8217;s most consequential contribution. The idea of using a guest species, in this case sodium, to template a framework and then removing it to leave a metastable elemental structure echoes the celebrated synthesis of open-framework silicon from sodium silicide clathrates, and it has been proposed as a route to exotic phases of other elements, including polymeric nitrogen and superconducting allotropes of silicon and carbon. By demonstrating the approach for boron, the Yanshan University team adds a new entry to a growing catalog of metastable materials that are accessible only through chemical templating. The sodium diffusion pathway and its energy barrier were mapped computationally, showing how the guest atoms can migrate out of the framework without collapsing it.</p>
<p>The work also required considerable experimental ingenuity at the growth stage. The team found that inserting zinc interlayers between the sodium and boron starting layers in the high-pressure assembly dramatically improved crystal size and quality, a detail they verified with control experiments and scanning electron microscopy of hundreds of crystals. Residual sodium content after degassing was tracked with energy-dispersive spectroscopy and electron energy-loss spectroscopy, and the analysis revealed that lower degassing temperatures or argon-flow conditions left more sodium behind, underscoring how sensitive the final purity, and therefore the properties, are to the extraction protocol. Subtle defect motifs associated with interstitial boron sites were identified in the refined structures, and the authors show that these defects, rather than secondary phases, explain weak additional diffraction features.</p>
<p>For applications, the combination of high conductivity and ductility in a light-element framework opens doors that conventional boron could never approach. Thermoelectric devices, which depend on materials with unusual electronic transport and low thermal conductivity, are an obvious candidate given the narrow bandgap and porous structure; theoretical work has long suggested that doping boron icosahedra could even produce superconductivity. Flexible or deformable electronics, lightweight electrodes, and mechanically resilient semiconducting components are other directions the open framework invites. More broadly, the result is a reminder that the periodic table still holds surprises in its simplest entries: a single element, boron, whose known phases were cataloged over decades, has just yielded a form that is simultaneously transparent to none of its usual weaknesses and rich in properties its usual phases never displayed. The team, led by Xiang-Feng Zhou and Yongjun Tian, with Feng Chen, Lianfeng Zou, and Penghui Li as co-first authors, suggests that the precursor-based strategy can now be extended to hunt for further metastable frameworks, meaning Imma-B60 may be less an endpoint than a template for what comes next.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Synthesis of a conductive and plastic open-framework boron allotrope via a high-pressure precursor route</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> An open-framework boron allotrope exhibiting high conductivity and plasticity</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Chen, F., Zou, L., Li, P., Fan, C., Liu, Y., Xu, B., Shao, X., Zhang, H., He, X.-L., Huang, M.-X., Chen, F., Nie, A., Ke, F., Zhao, Z., Dong, H., Yang, Y., Weng, X.-J., Wang, H.-T., Zhou, X.-F., &amp; Tian, Y. (2026). An open-framework boron allotrope exhibiting high conductivity and plasticity. <em>Nature Chemistry</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-026-02267-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-026-02267-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-026-02267-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41557-026-02267-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> boron, allotrope, open framework, high pressure, plasticity, electrical conductivity, B12 icosahedra, sodium boride, dislocation slip, metastable materials, Nature Chemistry, bandgap</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">210185</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
