<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>biophysical modeling &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/biophysical-modeling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 00:03:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Ocean Currents That Heal Reefs Also Spread Coral Disease, Simulations Reveal</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/ocean-currents-that-heal-reefs-also-spread-coral-disease-simulations-reveal/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 00:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biophysical modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coral disease transmission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coral reef connectivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coral reef conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coral reef health risks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coral reefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coral restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coral restoration strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disease outbreak mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergent disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida reef ecosystem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-resolution ocean modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrodynamic simulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larval dispersal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine ecosystem resilience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine pathogen spread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mission Iconic Reefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocean current dispersal of coral larvae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocean currents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population connectivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stony Coral Tissue Loss Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stony Coral Tissue Loss Disease (SCTLD)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=215509</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New biophysical simulations of Florida's Coral Reef show that the ocean currents which connect restored coral populations also transmit stony coral tissue loss disease, prompting researchers to develop a disease-penalized index for identifying safer restoration sites.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Florida&#8217;s Coral Reef, the same ocean currents that conservationists hope will carry coral larvae from restored colonies to depleted reefs may also be ferrying one of the deadliest pathogens ever recorded in marine ecosystems. A new study published in the journal Coral Reefs has, for the first time, quantified this uncomfortable trade-off directly, mapping both the benefits and the dangers of population connectivity across the entire 560-kilometer reef tract. Using a high-resolution coastal ocean model, researchers led by Daniel Holstein of Stony Brook University and Louisiana State University simulated the simultaneous dispersal of coral larvae from five reef-building species and the pathogenic agent responsible for stony coral tissue loss disease, or SCTLD, a devastating illness that first appeared off Miami-Dade County in the summer of 2014 and has since swept through nearly the whole Caribbean basin.</p>
<p>SCTLD has been described by scientists as the largest and most severe coral disease outbreak ever documented. It affects more than twenty stony coral species, and its spread along the Florida reef tract followed a pattern that strongly suggested ocean currents were the primary courier: an initial exponential expansion outward from the disease epicenter near Miami, followed by a persistent, linear march northward along the Southeast Florida reefs and southward into the Florida Keys. Earlier modeling work by coauthor Thomas Dobbelaere and colleagues, using a coupled hydrodynamic-epidemiological framework, confirmed that depth-averaged currents explained the progression of the disease front well and estimated that the pathogen likely persists in the water with a half-life of approximately thirty days. That long waterborne lifetime is central to the new findings, because it means disease particles remain infectious far longer than most coral larvae remain competent to settle.</p>
<p>To build their dual dispersal picture, the team employed SLIM, an unstructured-mesh, depth-integrated coastal ocean model covering Florida&#8217;s Coral Reef, the Florida Strait, and the eastern Gulf of Mexico over the period from May 2018 to January 2021. The computational mesh contained roughly 700,000 elements, with resolution refined to about 100 meters along the reef tract and coarsening to around 10 kilometers offshore, allowing the model to resolve fine-scale features such as recirculating eddies and channelized currents between individual reefs and islands. Deeper, shelf-break mesoscale circulation was relaxed toward fields from the HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model. Into this hydrodynamic engine, the researchers released virtual particles representing both coral larvae and SCTLD propagules, with particle motion governed by advection-diffusion dynamics solved with a fourth-order Runge-Kutta scheme and a stochastic diffusivity term estimated from classical oceanic diffusion diagrams.</p>
<p>The biological realism of the larval simulations rested on species-specific spawning schedules. Five species were modeled: staghorn coral Acropora cervicornis, mountainous star coral Orbicella faveolata, pillar coral Dendrogyra cylindrus, symmetrical brain coral Colpophyllia natans, and symmetric brain coral Pseudodiploria strigosa. Roughly one million virtual larvae per species were released per spawning event, timed according to species-specific lunar and daily periodicity in late summer. After a precompetency period of 5.12 days, larvae acquired competency to settle at a rate of 0.063 per day and lost competency at 0.016 per day, while mortality followed a Weibull survival model. The SCTLD agent, by contrast, was modeled as a neutrally buoyant tracer whose infectivity decayed exponentially with the thirty-day half-life inferred from earlier epidemiological fitting. The consequences of this difference proved profound: because infectious particles survive far longer than larval competence windows, they sample a much wider range of oceanographic conditions, including current reversals and eddies that carry them in essentially all directions across the reef.</p>
<p>The results, summarized in enormous connectivity matrices built from about 14,000 reef cells and nearly 200 million potential connections, delivered a stark headline finding: during the disease outbreak, populations on Florida&#8217;s Coral Reef were more connected by disease than by coral larvae. The disease agent formed a single strongly connected component spanning almost the entire reef tract, meaning virtually every reef can be reached by the pathogen, even if only through multi-step, low-probability pathways. Coral larvae, by contrast, formed species-specific networks with distinct strongly connected neighborhoods in the Upper, Middle, and Lower Keys and the Dry Tortugas, a separate component in Southeast Florida, and highly asymmetric, northward-skewed connectivity in the northern reef tract where the powerful Florida Current dominates. Connection strength ranked highest for A. cervicornis, followed by C. natans, P. strigosa, O. faveolata, and finally D. cylindrus, whose restricted spawning window yielded the most fragmented network.</p>
<p>The analytical core of the study is a new composite restoration index, R, that weighs a reef&#8217;s value as a larval source against its exposure to incoming disease. The index penalizes a reef&#8217;s normalized weighted coral out-degree, a measure of downstream seeding potential, by its normalized weighted disease in-degree, a measure of incoming pathogen connectivity, with a tunable parameter beta controlling the relative importance of disease risk. Scores range from minus one to one, with negative values indicating locations where disease exposure overwhelms any seeding benefit. By taking the median score across the range of beta values and applying spatial clustering, the team identified disease-penalized restoration hotspots throughout the reef tract, offering managers a tunable, species-specific planning tool rather than a single rigid ranking.</p>
<p>The spatial patterns that emerged were striking and, in some cases, counterintuitive. Reefs in Southeast Florida, despite strong larval export potential, received highly variable and often low restoration scores because they sit downstream of diverse and strong incoming disease connections from the outbreak&#8217;s original epicenter. Nearby reefs in Biscayne Bay and the northernmost Upper Keys, by contrast, maintained consistently positive scores even under heavy disease weighting, thanks to comparatively reduced incoming pathogen exposure. Broad hotspots appeared across Biscayne Bay, the northern Upper Keys, the Middle-Upper Keys transition, and throughout the Lower Keys, including a multispecies hotspot stretching from Sugarloaf Key to Key West. Species with similar spawning windows, such as A. cervicornis and O. faveolata, and separately C. natans and P. strigosa, produced closely matching hotspot maps, suggesting that paired, multispecies outplanting strategies could be designed around shared geography.</p>
<p>The study also scored the seven flagship sites of NOAA&#8217;s Mission: Iconic Reefs program, an ambitious federal initiative to restore some of the most historically significant reefs in Florida. Cheeca Rocks and Carysfort reefs emerged as exceptional multispecies candidates, combining strong seeding potential with comparatively low predicted disease exposure across most scenarios, while Sombrero, Looe, and Dry Rocks reefs scored consistently poorly, likely reflecting high disease exposure even though some of these sites may still function as quality larval sources. Newfound Harbour showed mixed results depending on the species. The authors stress that these scores represent one layer of information in a multifactorial decision landscape that also includes habitat suitability, historical significance, logistics, and the widely varying susceptibility of different coral species to SCTLD; staghorn coral, for example, is expected to be relatively resistant, while pillar coral is highly vulnerable.</p>
<p>For reef managers confronting accelerating environmental change, the study reframes a foundational assumption of restoration ecology. Population connectivity has long been treated as an unqualified good, the mechanism by which outplanted colonies rescue degraded reefs by replenishing them with larvae across generations. The new work demonstrates that in an era of emergent disease, connectivity is a double-edged sword: the same currents and sub-mesoscale oceanographic features that knit coral populations together also knit their epidemics together. The researchers acknowledge important limitations, including the assumption of similar larval traits across species, the exclusion of three-dimensional flows and wave-driven processes, and a model period limited to about four years, which cannot fully capture the influence of stochastic events such as hurricanes, which earlier work has shown can both enhance larval connectivity and supercharge disease spread.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, the practical implications are already flowing into policy. The team has summarized its data and provided it to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for use in natural resource management planning, and the open-source nature of the restoration index means it can be adapted to other coastal ecosystems facing similar disease threats. As ocean warming and global trade continue to fuel the emergence of novel pathogens in coastal seas, the study&#8217;s central message is likely to resonate far beyond Florida: restoration planning that ignores disease connectivity is planning with half the map. The reefs best positioned to seed the future, the simulations suggest, are not simply the best-connected ones, but those where the currents deliver larvae without delivering the plague.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Balancing larval dispersal benefits and disease transmission risks of population connectivity for coral restoration on Florida&#x27;s Coral Reef</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Balancing the benefits and risks of population connectivity to coral restoration in the age of emergent disease</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Holstein, D. M., Dobbelaere, T., Gramer, L. J., McEachron, L., Muller, E. M., Williams, S. D., &amp; Hanert, E. (2026). Balancing the benefits and risks of population connectivity to coral restoration in the age of emergent disease. <em>Coral Reefs</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-026-02951-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-026-02951-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-026-02951-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00338-026-02951-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> coral reefs, stony coral tissue loss disease, coral restoration, population connectivity, larval dispersal, biophysical modeling, Florida, ocean currents, emergent disease, Mission Iconic Reefs, hydrodynamic simulation, marine conservation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">215509</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deep learning captures the heartbeat of the sarcomere in milliseconds</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/deep-learning-captures-the-heartbeat-of-the-sarcomere-in-milliseconds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blake Davidson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 21:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advancements in cardiac force generation simulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applications of AI in molecular cardiac dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial neural network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial neural networks for sarcomere modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biophysical modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biophysical modeling of actin-myosin interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calcium signaling in heart muscle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calcium transient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiac muscle mechanics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiac sarcomere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiomyocyte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[challenges in classical muscle contraction models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computational cardiology and muscle contraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-bridge cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep learning in cardiovascular research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic mutations affecting sarcomere function]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine learning for cardiac biomechanics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myofilament dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neural network reproduction of muscle twitch contractions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapid analysis of cardiac microscale processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surrogate model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitch contraction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=210517</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study shows that a small deep neural network trained on simulations of a classic biophysical model can accurately predict the twitch force and shortening dynamics of cardiac sarcomeres across species and contraction protocols.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every heartbeat begins at a scale far smaller than any clinician can see, inside the sarcomere, the microscopic molecular engine where actin and myosin filaments slide past one another to generate force. Understanding how this engine responds to calcium signals, how it stretches and shortens, and how genetic mutations disrupt its rhythm has long depended on painstaking mathematical models built from decades of biophysics. Now a new study published in Machine Learning with Applications by Yasser Aboelkassem demonstrates that a relatively modest artificial neural network can learn to reproduce those intricate twitch contractions with remarkable fidelity, opening the door to faster, more flexible tools for cardiovascular research.</p>
<p>The research tackles a stubborn problem in computational cardiology. Classical models of muscle contraction, most notably the cross-bridge cycling framework developed by John Rice and colleagues in 2008, encode the biochemical dance of myosin heads attaching to and detaching from actin as a set of coupled nonlinear differential equations. These equations capture how calcium ions flood into the cell during each heartbeat, how regulatory proteins such as troponin and tropomyosin shift their conformations, and how the resulting molecular mechanics produce the characteristic rise and fall of force known as the twitch. The trouble is that solving these equations is computationally expensive, and the models themselves rest on simplifying assumptions that limit how well they can predict the effects of disease or genetic mutation.</p>
<p>Aboelkassem&#8217;s approach was to train a feedforward artificial neural network on synthetic twitch data generated by the Rice model, effectively teaching the network to imitate the physics encoded in the differential equations. The network takes seven inputs: the species being simulated, time, initial sarcomere length, peak calcium concentration, the stiffness of a series elastic element representing the compliant ends of the muscle, temperature, and a flag identifying the contraction protocol. From these it predicts two outputs: the time-dependent active force and the changing sarcomere length. Species were coded with a simple flag, rats as one and rabbits as two, while the three contraction protocols, isosarcometric, cell shortening, and isometric, were likewise encoded numerically.</p>
<p>The training data swept across physiologically meaningful ranges. Peak calcium transients varied from 0.85 to 1.45 micromolar, initial sarcomere lengths ranged from 1.4 to 2.4 micrometers, series elastic stiffness spanned a fiftyfold range, and temperature moved between 20 and 30 degrees Celsius. The dataset was split seventy-thirty between training and validation, and the network was optimized using the Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation algorithm, a workhorse method for nonlinear regression prized for its rapid convergence. Training continued until the mean squared error fell below ten to the minus seventh power, which typically took around one thousand epochs in the optimized configuration.</p>
<p>Architecture turned out to matter enormously. A shallow network with only five hidden neurons plateaued early in training, its error stuck near ten to the minus third power, and its predictions of twitch force showed large, nonphysical oscillations during the early rising phase of contraction. When the network was deepened to three hidden layers containing ten, ten, and five neurons respectively, performance transformed. Mean squared error dropped more than two orders of magnitude, error histograms collapsed into sharply peaked distributions around zero, and predicted outputs clustered tightly along the ideal identity line when plotted against target values. The study characterizes this as a textbook transition from underfitting to a well-conditioned model with strong generalization, evidenced by the fact that training and validation errors declined smoothly in parallel without the divergence that would signal overfitting.</p>
<p>Quantitatively, the optimized network achieved a mean squared error of 0.00008 and a coefficient of determination of 0.96 for isosarcometric contractions, 0.000146 and 0.91 for cell shortening, and 0.000204 and 0.88 for isometric twitches. Those numbers are impressive on their own, but the deeper significance lies in what the network learned rather than what it merely memorized. Tested on independent datasets never seen during training, the deep model faithfully reproduced the canonical biophysics of cardiac muscle: the Frank-Starling-like behavior in which longer sarcomeres generate higher peak forces and prolonged twitches, the calcium sensitivity of force production, and the subtle interplay between internal shortening, series elasticity, and relaxation kinetics. When series stiffness decreased, allowing greater internal shortening, the model correctly predicted reduced peak force with a delayed peak and faster relaxation, matching the theoretical curves across every tested value.</p>
<p>Crucially, the framework also captured species differences. Rat and rabbit myocardium behave distinctly, with rabbit cardiac muscle exhibiting slower activation and relaxation kinetics and a stronger length dependence of force development. Because the network was trained on data from both species simultaneously, a single unified model learned to distinguish these regimes and to produce accurate rabbit twitch predictions across all three protocols, something the shallow network could not accomplish. This ability to generalize across physiologically distinct systems suggests the approach could eventually be extended to human cardiac dynamics, where inter-individual variability is even greater.</p>
<p>There is also a practical payoff in speed. Solving the Rice model requires numerically integrating stiff, coupled nonlinear differential equations for every simulation, a costly operation when thousands of parameter combinations must be explored for optimization, sensitivity analysis, or uncertainty quantification. Once trained, the neural network produced twitch predictions in an average of about 0.49 seconds, roughly ten times faster than direct numerical solution, with no parallelization required. That speedup, multiplied across large-scale simulation campaigns, could substantially accelerate studies of cardiac mechanics.</p>
<p>The author is candid about the study&#8217;s limitations. Because the network was trained entirely on synthetic data from a single mechanistic model, it inherits the assumptions of that model and does not encounter the noise and variability of real laboratory measurements. The work is explicitly framed as a proof of concept, and validation against experimental twitch data is the necessary next step. No uncertainty quantification was performed, the evaluation relied primarily on mean squared error, and physiological constraints were learned implicitly from the training data rather than enforced directly within the learning process. The study also does not attempt to invent a novel machine learning architecture; its point is precisely that a plain feedforward network, given sufficient depth, can serve as a trustworthy surrogate for a established biophysical model.</p>
<p>Even with those caveats, the implications are considerable. A validated, data-driven surrogate of sarcomere dynamics could be coupled to disease models of cardiac remodeling, used to screen the contractile consequences of genetic mutations in troponin, tropomyosin, or myosin, and eventually parameterized with patient-specific data for personalized simulations of heart function. As larger multi-species and multi-condition datasets become available, hybrid approaches that embed physical constraints directly into the learning process could push accuracy and reliability further. For now, this study establishes that the deepest secrets of the heartbeat, worked out over half a century of muscle biophysics, can be compressed into a network of just twenty-five neurons, and recalled nearly instantly whenever the question is asked.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Deep learning prediction of cardiac sarcomere twitch contraction dynamics</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Machine learning model for cardiac sarcomere twitch contraction dynamics</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Machine learning model for cardiac sarcomere twitch contraction dynamics. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2026.101002" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2026.101002</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2026.101002" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.mlwa.2026.101002</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> cardiac sarcomere, machine learning, artificial neural network, cross-bridge cycling, twitch contraction, biophysical modeling, myofilament dynamics, calcium transient, cardiomyocyte, surrogate model, deep learning, cardiac muscle mechanics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">210517</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
