<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>biogenic emissions &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/biogenic-emissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 12:34:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Forests Feed the Stratosphere: Monsoons Lift Tree Emissions into Earth&#8217;s Aerosol Layer</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/forests-feed-the-stratosphere-monsoons-lift-tree-emissions-into-earths-aerosol-layer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell Cooper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 12:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerosol composition and sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atmospheric aerosol measurement campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atmospheric chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biogenic emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CESM1-CARMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate modeling of aerosol distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest-emitted particles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-altitude haze origins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of forest emissions on ozone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of monsoons on stratospheric aerosols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isoprene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monsoon circulation and pollutant uplift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monsoon convection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monsoon-driven aerosol transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Persistent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of forests in Earth's radiation balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAGE II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secondary organic aerosol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stratospheric aerosol layer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stratospheric aerosols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tropical Pacific atmospheric chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tropopause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upper troposphere]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=214377</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New research combining nine aircraft campaigns with advanced climate modeling shows that biogenic organic particles from forests make up about forty percent of the background stratospheric aerosol layer, delivered aloft by the world's monsoon circulations.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deep above the tropical Pacific, at altitudes where airliners cruise and the air is a hundred times drier than at sea level, a persistent haze of tiny particles has puzzled atmospheric scientists for decades. This background stratospheric aerosol layer, the quiet residue left between volcanic eruptions and wildfire injections, shapes Earth&#8217;s radiation balance and provides surfaces for chemical reactions that influence ozone. Yet its composition and origins have remained stubbornly uncertain. A new study published in Nature Geoscience now argues that a surprisingly large share of this high-altitude haze comes not from volcanoes, industry, or fires, but from the world&#8217;s forests, and that the delivery mechanism is none other than the planet&#8217;s great monsoon circulations.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Kai Qie and Pengfei Yu of Jinan University together with colleagues at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou University, the NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research, NOAA, and the University of Colorado Boulder, assembled an unusually broad evidence base. They combined in situ aerosol measurements from nine airborne field campaigns, including ACCENT, CR-AVE, Pre-AVE, POSIDON, ACCLIP, ATom, StratoClim, ACRIDICON-CHUVA, and OP3, with simulations from a state-of-the-art sectional aerosol climate model, CESM1-CARMA. This pairing of direct observations with a microphysically detailed model allowed the researchers to quantify both what is floating in the lower stratosphere and how it got there.</p>
<p>The first headline finding is striking: biogenic secondary organic aerosol, particles formed when reactive gases emitted by vegetation are oxidized in the atmosphere, accounts for roughly forty percent of the global mean annual background stratospheric aerosol burden. In other words, nearly half of the quiet-time particle load above the weather is made of material that began its journey as volatile organic compounds wafting from leaves. The particles are transported into the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere through convective pathways that the authors describe as previously underappreciated, operating over the monsoon systems of South America, central Africa, Indonesia-Australia, and southern Asia.</p>
<p>The second discovery concerns the sheer scale of this vertical flux. The team estimates that between 0.42 and 0.72 teragrams of biogenic organic aerosol cross the tropopause each year. Set against the average rate of volcanic aerosol injection into the stratosphere over the past two decades, a period of relative volcanic quiescence, this biogenic flux is five to ninety percent larger. That comparison reframes the stratospheric aerosol budget: during years without major eruptions, forests may deliver as much particulate matter aloft as the volcanoes that have traditionally dominated thinking about the layer.</p>
<p>The physical mechanism hinges on the peculiar power of monsoon convection. Monsoon systems host some of the deepest and most vigorous thunderstorms on Earth, with updrafts capable of lifting air from the boundary layer to the tropical tropopause layer within hours. Satellite measurements of outgoing longwave radiation, used by the team as a proxy for deep convection, show that aerosol extinction in the lower stratosphere peaks seasonally in step with monsoon activity over each region. The Asian summer monsoon, long recognized as a pathway for pollution and short-lived chlorine compounds into the stratosphere, emerges here as one node in a global network that also includes the tropical monsoons of the Amazon, the Congo basin, and the maritime continent.</p>
<p>The chemistry behind the particles is equally consequential. Plants emit enormous quantities of isoprene and other biogenic volatile organic compounds, and recent work has shown that under the cold, low-pressure conditions of the upper troposphere these compounds can oxidize and nucleate into new particles, with isoprene-derived products such as epoxydiols and isoprene nitrates playing key roles. The new simulations reproduce observed isoprene column densities from the CrIS satellite and match vertical profiles measured during the CAFE Brazil and POSIDON campaigns, lending credibility to the modeled chain that runs from forest canopy to stratospheric particle.</p>
<p>Not everything that rises is delivered. Deep convection is a double-edged sword for aerosols, because the same updrafts that loft particles also drive precipitation that scavenges them. Earlier modeling work by some of the same authors quantified how efficiently in-cloud removal strips aerosols from convective outflow, which is precisely why the survival of a substantial biogenic fraction in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere is notable. The new analysis suggests that gas-phase precursors carried upward in monsoon outflow continue to form particles after reaching the upper troposphere, effectively manufacturing aerosol at altitudes where wet removal can no longer touch it.</p>
<p>The observational fingerprints come from an impressive suite of instruments. Aircraft-based particle spectrometers and aerosol mass spectrometers measured size distributions and composition from the boundary layer to around nineteen kilometers, while the SAGE II and SAGE III-ISS satellite instruments provided two decades of stratospheric extinction profiles that the team compared against model output during the volcanically quiet 1999 to 2004 window. The agreement between cloud-removed satellite extinction statistics and CESM1-CARMA simulations across the tropical eastern Pacific, southern Atlantic, and southern Indian Ocean supports the conclusion that the model captures the real background aerosol budget rather than an artifact of parameterization.</p>
<p>Why does this matter beyond atmospheric chemistry? Stratospheric aerosols scatter sunlight and alter stratospheric heating rates, and they host heterogeneous reactions central to ozone depletion chemistry. Any accurate accounting of climate sensitivity, geoengineering proposals that would deliberately inject sulfur into the stratosphere, or projections of ozone recovery must therefore include a realistic background, and that background now appears to be substantially organic and biologically sourced. The findings also connect land use to the upper atmosphere: deforestation reduces forest volatile emissions, and earlier work has suggested such changes can cool climate by cutting organic aerosol production, a linkage this study sharpens considerably.</p>
<p>The study, published on 25 September 2026 in Nature Geoscience, carries implications that reach from the Amazon canopy to the edge of space. It demonstrates that the boundary between the living surface of the planet and the chemically stratospheric realm is far more porous than textbook pictures suggest, and that the seasonal breathing of tropical forests, funneled upward by monsoon circulations, leaves a measurable signature in the stratospheric aerosol layer year after year. As the authors emphasize, global monsoon convections play an important role in the background stratospheric aerosol budget, a conclusion that will now need to be woven into climate models, ozone assessments, and any serious discussion of deliberate climate intervention.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Transport of biogenic secondary organic aerosols into the lower stratosphere via global monsoon convection</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Persistent contribution of biogenic emissions to lower stratospheric aerosols via global monsoon convections</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Qie, K., Shao, M., Peng, Y., Wang, X., Chen, W., Pan, L. L., Schill, G., Rosenlof, K. H., Toon, O. B., Bian, J., &amp; Yu, P. (2026). Persistent contribution of biogenic emissions to lower stratospheric aerosols via global monsoon convections. <em>Nature Geoscience</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-026-02115-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-026-02115-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-026-02115-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41561-026-02115-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> stratospheric aerosols, biogenic emissions, secondary organic aerosol, monsoon convection, isoprene, upper troposphere, CESM1-CARMA, SAGE II, tropopause, atmospheric chemistry, climate, Persistent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">214377</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rising Ground-Level Ozone in Sweden Is Increasingly Driven by VOCs, 20-Year Analysis Reveals</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/rising-ground-level-ozone-in-sweden-is-increasingly-driven-by-vocs-20-year-analysis-reveals/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell Cooper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 01:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air quality monitoring and modeling in Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atmospheric reanalysis data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biogenic emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAMS reanalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemistry of ozone production and its environmental effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change and ozone pollution dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of declining emissions on ground-level ozone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERA5 reanalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[formaldehyde-to-nitrogen dioxide ratio in air quality studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ground-level ozone increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HCHO/NO2 ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of volatile organic compounds on air pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term ozone concentration trends in Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mann-Kendall test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOx-limited regime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ozone pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy implications of ozone formation mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regional differences in ozone pollution in Scandinavia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface ozone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOC-limited regime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOCs and nitrogen oxides in atmospheric chemistry]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=209349</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A 20-year reanalysis study finds surface ozone rising significantly across northern Sweden and shows that ozone formation in most of the country's urban areas is increasingly limited by VOCs rather than NOx.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surface ozone, the same molecule that shields life in the stratosphere but poisons it at ground level, has been quietly climbing across parts of Sweden for two decades, and new research suggests that the chemistry controlling its production is shifting in ways that could reshape how the country cleans its air. A study published in BMC Environmental Science analyzed twenty years of atmospheric reanalysis data from 2004 to 2023 and found a statistically significant increase in surface ozone concentrations across northern Sweden exceeding 0.3 parts per billion by volume per year, a trend that stands out against a backdrop of generally declining emissions of the pollutants that form ozone in the first place.</p>
<p>The research, conducted by Sachin Budakoti of Lund University&#8217;s Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, tackled a long-standing question in atmospheric chemistry: is ozone formation in a given region limited by nitrogen oxides (NOx) or by volatile organic compounds (VOCs)? The answer matters enormously for policy, because cutting the wrong pollutant can actually make ozone pollution worse. To resolve this, the study used a diagnostic known as the formaldehyde-to-nitrogen dioxide ratio, or FNR, which compares the abundance of formaldehyde (HCHO), a by-product of VOC oxidation, with nitrogen dioxide (NO2), a key component of NOx. This ratio acts as a chemical fingerprint of the ozone production regime.</p>
<p>The underlying chemistry is deceptively simple yet notoriously non-linear. Ozone is not emitted directly; it forms when sunlight drives reactions between NOx and VOCs. In a VOC-limited regime, ozone production is saturated with NOx, so the limiting ingredient is the supply of VOC-derived radicals. In a NOx-limited regime, the opposite holds: VOCs are plentiful and NOx availability controls ozone formation. Between these extremes lies a transitional regime where both matter. The FNR captures this balance because it reflects the relative abundance of VOC-derived radicals versus NOx. Ratios below 1 indicate VOC-limited conditions, ratios above 2 indicate NOx-limited conditions, and values between 1 and 2 signal a transitional regime.</p>
<p>Budakoti drew on the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) global reanalysis, which combines satellite observations with chemical transport modeling to produce continuous, spatially consistent fields of ozone, HCHO, and NO2 at a resolution of 0.75 by 0.75 degrees. To validate the dataset, the CAMS ozone values were compared against AIRS satellite observations over Sweden, yielding a correlation coefficient of 0.85, a root mean square error of 3.45 ppbv, and an index of agreement of 0.66, indicating reasonable agreement. Meteorological variables, including surface temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed, came from the ERA5 reanalysis produced by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts at finer 0.25-degree resolution.</p>
<p>Long-term trends were assessed with the Mann-Kendall test, a non-parametric statistical method applied independently at each grid cell across Sweden using monthly mean concentrations. The results revealed a striking spatial pattern. Northern Sweden showed a statistically significant ozone increase greater than 0.3 ppbv per year at the 95 percent confidence level, while trends in NO2, which decreased, and HCHO, which increased, over the same region fell short of statistical significance. Seasonally, ozone rose during spring and summer months, driven by enhanced photochemical activity under longer daylight hours and warmer temperatures, as well as an earlier onset of the ozone season linked to changes in snow cover and vegetation phenology. During autumn and winter, ozone declined as reduced solar radiation, weaker photochemical production, and more frequent atmospheric inversions limited formation and trapped pollutants near the surface.</p>
<p>Correlation analysis added further depth to the picture. Ozone displayed a strong and statistically significant negative association with NO2 across Sweden, with correlation coefficients below -0.4, reflecting the well-known titration effect in which nitric oxide destroys ozone by converting it to nitrogen dioxide. In contrast, ozone showed a moderate positive correlation with HCHO, between 0.35 and 0.5, and a strong positive correlation with the FNR ratio, exceeding 0.6. Together, these relationships indicate that higher formaldehyde and lower nitrogen dioxide levels combine to produce elevated ozone across the country, a pattern shaped by both anthropogenic emissions and the biogenic VOC flux from Sweden&#8217;s extensive forests.</p>
<p>The meteorological analysis underscored the pivotal role of temperature. Surface ozone exhibited a strong, statistically significant positive association with temperature across central, northern, and southern Sweden, while associations with relative humidity were weaker and not statistically significant, and wind speed showed no consistent relationship. High temperatures and strong sunlight accelerate photochemical reaction rates and boost biogenic VOC emissions, creating a feedback that climate warming is likely to amplify. Both temperature and wind speed themselves showed statistically significant increasing trends over the study period, a signal consistent with the pronounced warming Sweden has experienced in recent decades in line with broader Arctic climate trends.</p>
<p>The core finding of the sensitivity analysis is unambiguous: FNR values below 1 dominate across the urbanized southern and central parts of Sweden, including cities such as Stockholm and Gothenburg, indicating that ozone production there is VOC-limited, meaning the system is saturated with NOx from traffic, shipping, and industry. Only the rural areas of the northern Norland region, where FNR values fall between 1 and 2, occupy a transitional regime shifting from VOC-limited toward NOx-limited conditions. An ozone isopleth analysis reinforced this conclusion, showing that the highest ozone concentrations occurred under conditions of rising HCHO and falling NO2, the hallmark of VOC-limited chemistry. In such an environment, increasing VOCs supplies more peroxy radicals that convert nitric oxide to nitrogen dioxide and sustain ozone formation, while decreasing NO2 simultaneously weakens the titration effect that would otherwise destroy ozone, creating an optimal chemical environment for ozone accumulation.</p>
<p>These findings carry substantial implications for air quality management. In VOC-limited urban environments, reducing NOx emissions alone could initially increase ozone concentrations by removing the titration effect, a counterintuitive outcome that has complicated mitigation efforts in many cities worldwide. The study therefore argues that VOC-focused strategies are essential for reducing ground-level ozone across most of Sweden&#8217;s urban areas. The results also align with earlier Scandinavian and European assessments, which have reported that ozone levels in European cities are rising even as peak values decline, and that ozone in Sweden is shaped substantially by long-range transport from continental Europe rather than by local emissions alone. Sweden, despite not being a major emitter of ozone precursors, is increasingly affected by imported pollution and by climate-driven increases in biogenic VOC emissions that can shift ozone formation regimes even where anthropogenic NOx is low.</p>
<p>The study is the first of its kind to apply FNR-based sensitivity diagnostics to the Swedish region over a two-decade span, and it supports the growing evidence that region-specific thresholds are more appropriate than universal cutoffs when diagnosing ozone chemistry. Because the analysis used surface-level concentrations rather than satellite column measurements, the threshold magnitudes differ from those derived from space-based studies, since HCHO has a substantial free-tropospheric contribution while NO2 is strongly surface-confined. The author cautions that reanalysis data smooth out local emission gradients, particularly in urban areas, and that HCHO fields at high latitudes carry known uncertainties, so the results should be read as indicating broad spatial regimes rather than precise local chemical controls. Future work integrating in situ observations and higher-resolution chemical transport modeling will help refine the diagnosis, but the message is already clear: as Sweden warms and its forests exhale more reactive carbon, the fight against ground-level ozone will increasingly be a fight against VOCs.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Long-term surface ozone trends and NOx-VOC sensitivity regimes in Sweden using the HCHO/NO2 ratio and CAMS reanalysis data</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Identification of surface ozone sensitivity for NO₂ and secondary HCHO in Sweden</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Identification of surface ozone sensitivity for NO₂ and secondary HCHO in Sweden. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s44329-026-00047-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s44329-026-00047-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s44329-026-00047-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s44329-026-00047-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> surface ozone, Sweden, CAMS reanalysis, HCHO/NO2 ratio, VOC-limited regime, NOx-limited regime, Mann-Kendall test, biogenic emissions, air quality, ozone pollution, climate warming, ERA5 reanalysis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">209349</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
