<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>biodegradation &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/biodegradation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 21:54:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Polyethylene Microplastics Linger in Soil for Decades as They Quietly Merge With Soil Structure</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/polyethylene-microplastics-linger-in-soil-for-decades-as-they-quietly-merge-with-soil-structure/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 21:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agricultural soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodegradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon-13 labeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of microplastics on soil health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental fate of microplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term plastic degradation in soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial degradation of plastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastic carbon isotope tracing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microplastic soil contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics in soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mineralization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NanoSIMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastic degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polyethylene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polyethylene microplastics environmental impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polyethylene microplastics in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polyethylene persistence in farmland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil aggregates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microplastic integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil organic matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil structure alteration by microplastics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=198980</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A 22-month isotope-labeling experiment shows polyethylene microplastics mineralize at just 0.12 percent in agricultural soil while gradually embedding themselves in soil aggregates and organic matter.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polyethylene is everywhere. It wraps our food, lines our agricultural mulch films, and sheds fragments into the ground with every season of use. Now, one of the most detailed long-term experiments ever conducted on plastic in soil has confirmed what many researchers feared: once polyethylene microplastics enter agricultural soil, they barely break down at all — and instead of disappearing, they quietly weave themselves into the very architecture of the soil. A team of German and Swiss researchers, led by Hannah Forsyth and Moritz Bigalke of the Technical University of Darmstadt, incubated isotopically labeled polyethylene in farmland soil for nearly two years and found that just 0.12 percent of the plastic had been converted to carbon dioxide by the end of the experiment.</p>
<p>The study, published in the journal Microplastics and Nanoplastics, stands out for its methodological rigor. Rather than relying on bulk measurements that can be confounded by background carbon, the researchers used polyethylene enriched with carbon-13, a stable isotope that acts as a molecular fingerprint. By tracking the appearance of carbon-13 in carbon dioxide released from the incubated soil, they could measure microbial mineralization with extraordinary precision. Any carbon-13 dioxide detected had to come from the plastic, because natural soil carbon carries a far lower abundance of this heavy isotope. This allowed the team to separate the slow metabolism of plastic-eating microbes from the vast background noise of ordinary soil respiration.</p>
<p>The plastic itself was not simply dropped into the soil as pristine beads. The researchers first aged it with ultraviolet light, mimicking the weathering that plastic undergoes in the field before it is tilled into the ground. UV exposure breaks polymer chains and introduces oxygen-containing chemical groups at the surface, which is widely considered a prerequisite for microbial attack. Even under these favorable conditions, the soil microbial community managed to oxidize only a tiny fraction of the polymer over the 22-month incubation. The mineralization rate was highest early in the experiment and declined over time, suggesting that the most accessible, oxidized surface material was consumed first, leaving behind a polymer core that microbes could barely touch.</p>
<p>Extrapolated to real-world timescales, the numbers are sobering. If 0.12 percent mineralizes in less than two years, and the rate continues to fall as the remaining plastic becomes less accessible, complete degradation of polyethylene in soil would take centuries, if it happens at all under natural conditions. Agricultural soils are among the most plastic-contaminated environments on Earth, receiving fragments from mulch films, plastic-coated fertilizers, irrigation pipes, sewage sludge, and atmospheric deposition. The new findings imply that virtually every gram of polyethylene ever tilled into farmland is still there, either as visible fragments or as microscopic and submicroscopic particles dispersed through the soil matrix.</p>
<p>But persistence is only half of the story. The second major finding concerns where the plastic goes. Using nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry, or NanoSIMS, the team mapped the location of the labeled plastic inside individual soil aggregates — the small, crumb-like clusters of mineral particles and organic matter that give soil its structure. They found microplastics and even nanoplastics lodged inside pores within 1-to-2-millimeter aggregates, spaces that are typically sheltered from water flow and physical disturbance. This means plastic particles are not merely sitting on the soil surface; they are being transported into the interior architecture of aggregates, where they can reside for very long periods and become increasingly difficult to extract or study.</p>
<p>The physical integration of plastic into soil structure has consequences that go beyond simple contamination. Soil aggregates regulate water infiltration, aeration, root penetration, and the protection of organic carbon from decomposition. Introducing hydrophobic polymer surfaces into these delicate structures can alter how water and gases move through the soil, and may change how aggregates form and break apart. The study also found small but measurable amounts of polyethylene-derived carbon-13 incorporated into soil organic matter and into the microbial biomass itself. This indicates that some carbon from the plastic does enter the soil&#8217;s biological and chemical cycles — not through rapid mineralization, but through slow assimilation into the organic pool that sustains soil fertility.</p>
<p>That incorporation, however, was minor. The overwhelming majority of the labeled carbon remained as intact or partially oxidized polymer. For the researchers, this combination of extreme persistence and gradual integration is the key takeaway. Polyethylene does not vanish in soil; it becomes part of the soil. Over years and decades, fragments fragment further, migrate into smaller pores, associate with mineral surfaces and organic matter, and effectively become a permanent, synthetic component of the terrestrial environment. Unlike organic amendments that decompose into nutrients, this material accumulates, and its long-term effects on soil health remain largely unknown.</p>
<p>The work was carried out under the MINAGRIS project — MIcro- and Nanoplastics in AGRIcultural Soils — funded by the European Union&#8217;s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program. The project brings together institutions across Europe to assess how plastic debris affects soil biodiversity, productivity, and function. The new results provide a quantitative foundation for those assessments, offering hard numbers on mineralization rates that can feed into models of plastic accumulation in farmland. They also validate the use of isotope labeling combined with high-resolution imaging as a powerful toolkit for studying the fate of plastics in complex environmental matrices, where traditional extraction methods miss particles embedded deep within aggregates.</p>
<p>For farmers and policymakers, the message is clear: prevention matters far more than remediation. No known technology can remove microplastics from soil once they are incorporated, and the new data suggest there will be ample time for them to spread. Reducing plastic inputs to agricultural land — through biodegradable mulch alternatives, better recovery of plastic films, restrictions on sewage-sludge application, and improved waste management — is currently the only effective strategy for limiting the buildup. As the researchers demonstrate, every year of continued plastic input adds material that will remain in the ground long after current farming practices have changed.</p>
<p>The study also raises questions for future research. The incubation captured a single soil type under controlled laboratory conditions; field soils experience freeze-thaw cycles, wetting-drying pulses, root growth, and tillage, all of which can physically fragment plastic and redistribute it. Whether these processes accelerate mineralization or simply enhance the physical dispersion of particles into aggregates is an open question. What is already certain, however, is that polyethylene&#8217;s reputation as an inert, harmless filler material in soil is untenable. It persists, it infiltrates, and it slowly becomes one with the ground beneath our feet — a legacy that future generations of soil scientists, and farmers, will have to live with.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Fate, mineralization, and physical integration of polyethylene microplastics in agricultural soil</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Polyethylene microplastics mineralize slowly in soil but integrate into soil structures and organic matter</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Forsyth, H., Schweizer, S., Stricker, K., Höschen, C., Velescu, A., Wilcke, W., &amp; Bigalke, M. (2026). Polyethylene microplastics mineralize slowly in soil but integrate into soil structures and organic matter. <em>Microplastics and Nanoplastics, 6</em>(1), Article 54. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-026-00223-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-026-00223-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-026-00223-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s43591-026-00223-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> polyethylene, microplastics, nanoplastics, soil pollution, mineralization, carbon-13 labeling, soil aggregates, soil organic matter, biodegradation, agricultural soils, NanoSIMS, plastic degradation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">198980</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acacia Gum and Bentonite Give Starch Bioplastics a Major Strength Boost</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/acacia-gum-and-bentonite-give-starch-bioplastics-a-major-strength-boost/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 16:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acacia gum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acacia gum as bioplastic additive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acid-hydrolyzed cellulose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bentonite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bentonite clay in bioplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodegradable plastic degradation control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodegradable plastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodegradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioplastic mechanical property enhancement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cassava starch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cassava starch bioplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eco-friendly plastic alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen bonding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-cost bioplastic production methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moisture absorption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moisture-resistant biodegradable plastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanocellulose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant-based bioplastic strengthening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastic waste reduction strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable materials for packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Young's modulus]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=186411</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have shown that acacia gum and bentonite clay can dramatically improve the strength, water resistance and degradation behavior of bioplastics made from cassava starch and acid-hydrolyzed cellulose.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A team of researchers in Cameroon, Belgium and South Africa has shown that two humble additives—a natural gum harvested from acacia trees and a common clay called bentonite—can dramatically transform the properties of biodegradable plastics made from cassava starch and cellulose. The study, published in the journal Discover Industrial Chemistry and Materials, reports that adding acacia gum to a starch-cellulose film nearly quadruples its stiffness, while combining the gum with bentonite slashes the material&#8217;s water uptake and slows its breakdown in soil. The findings offer a low-cost, plant-based route to tougher and more moisture-resistant bioplastics at a time when the world is drowning in persistent plastic waste.</p>
<p>The motivation behind the work is stark. Global plastic consumption was estimated at 700 million tonnes in 2021, yet only about six percent of that material is recycled. Projections cited by the authors suggest that by 2050 worldwide plastic use could climb to between 753.5 and 832.4 million tonnes, with global recycling of plastic waste still languishing at roughly 13 percent. Because conventional petrochemical plastics do not biodegrade, they fragment into microparticles that contaminate ecosystems and can even enter the human food chain. Bioplastics made from renewable agricultural resources such as starch are an attractive alternative, but they suffer from two chronic weaknesses: they absorb water readily and they lack mechanical strength.</p>
<p>Starch is one of the cheapest and most abundant biopolymers available. Cassava, in particular, is a major crop in Cameroon, which produces more than five million tonnes of roots every year—about 40 percent of the world&#8217;s production. Yet most of that cassava is consumed as food, and the industrial starch market remains underdeveloped. The researchers, led by Herman Assonfack Lekane of the University of Yaoundé I, set out to upgrade cassava starch into a viable plastic by reinforcing it with acid-hydrolyzed cellulose derived from Ceiba pentandra, a tropical tree known locally as Eteng, and then modifying the resulting composite with acacia gum and bentonite.</p>
<p>The cellulose was extracted from Eteng wood and then treated with 60 percent sulfuric acid to produce acid-hydrolyzed cellulose, abbreviated NCE in the study. The acid dissolves the amorphous regions of cellulose, leaving behind highly crystalline nanoscale fibrils. Characterization by scanning electron microscopy revealed fibers only a few nanometers thick after treatment, while X-ray diffraction confirmed a higher crystallinity index for the hydrolyzed material than for the raw cellulose. Infrared spectroscopy detected new bands at 1264 and 804 per centimeter, signatures of sulfate ester groups grafted onto the cellulose surface during the acid reaction. These charged groups, measured at a density of 8 times ten to the minus six moles per gram by conductimetry, help the particles disperse and can enhance thermal stability.</p>
<p>Three film formulations were prepared and compared. The reference composite, labeled AN, combined five percent cassava starch suspension with glycerol as a plasticizer, sodium carbonate, and ten percent NCE relative to starch mass. A second formulation, ANG, added 12.5 percent acacia gum—an exudate from African Vachellia nilotica trees supplied by a traditional production unit in northern Cameroon. The third, ANBG, further incorporated 30 percent bentonite clay relative to starch mass. Each suspension was gelatinized at 70 degrees Celsius for 30 minutes, cast into molds, and dried at 50 degrees Celsius for three days.</p>
<p>The most striking result concerned water. When films were exposed to a humid atmosphere of 87 percent relative humidity, the reference starch-cellulose film absorbed water rapidly, reaching a maximum uptake of about 30 percent after 300 minutes. Adding acacia gum cut that figure to roughly 20 percent, and the gum-bentonite combination reduced it to about 10 percent—a reduction of 18 percent relative to the gum-only film and a dramatic improvement over the pristine composite. Infrared analysis explained why: the gum and clay form hydrogen bonds with the starch and cellulose chains, occupying the molecular sites that water molecules would otherwise bind to. The intensity of the hydroxyl stretching band and the free-water deformation band both dropped in the modified films, confirming tighter internal bonding and less adsorbed water.</p>
<p>Mechanical testing delivered equally impressive numbers. The reference film had a Young&#8217;s modulus of 39.9 megapascals and a tensile strength of 1.46 megapascals. With acacia gum added, the modulus soared to 150.7 megapascals and the tensile strength climbed to 7.14 megapascals—nearly a fivefold increase in stiffness. The researchers attribute this hardening effect to the gum&#8217;s chemical functionality, which improves adhesion between the starch matrix and the cellulose reinforcement. Small molecules from the gum appear to intercalate between polymer chains, facilitating chain sliding while simultaneously building a denser network of bonds. Interestingly, adding bentonite on top of the gum partially reversed the gains: the gum-clay film reached a modulus of 133.3 megapascals and a strength of 4.13 megapascals, still well above the reference but below the gum-only material. The clay particles appear to interfere with polymer-gum networking and to aggregate into fragile domains that limit elongation.</p>
<p>Thermal analysis added further nuance. Differential scanning calorimetry showed that the melting of the starch component, recorded at 133 degrees Celsius in the reference film, shifted to 171 degrees Celsius with gum and rose a further 24 degrees with the gum-bentonite combination. The gum retards melting by increasing hydrogen bonding within the film, while the mineral clay acts as a barrier to heat diffusion through the matrix. Thermogravimetric analysis, evaluated with the Broido model between 300 and 350 degrees Celsius, revealed that activation energies decreased from 76.9 kilojoules per mole for the reference film to 69.9 with gum and 66.7 with gum plus bentonite, indicating progressively weaker internal interactions as additives were introduced. The authors propose an ordering of interaction energies: starch-cellulose bonding is strongest, followed by the gum-modified and then the gum-clay systems. Bentonite&#8217;s contribution is therefore physical rather than chemical—a heat shield rather than a bonding agent.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most consequential finding relates to biodegradation. Films were buried in soil from Mbalmayo in central Cameroon, with a pH of 5.1 and a composition of 65 percent sand, 29 percent clay and 21 percent silt, at 80 percent relative humidity and 25 degrees Celsius. Mass loss increased with burial time in all films, but the gum-containing formulations degraded noticeably more slowly. Because the microorganisms that decompose these materials depend on moisture, the reduced water uptake of the modified films starves them of the conditions they need to thrive. Bentonite further slows the process by drawing migrating water into the clay phase, leaving less available in the carbohydrate region where microbes operate. The authors suggest this controlled degradation could be a feature rather than a flaw: films that persist long enough to be useful but still break down naturally at end of life.</p>
<p>The study positions acacia gum as a genuine bio-hardener for starch-based plastics, echoing earlier work showing that African tree exudates can harden tannin-based wood adhesives. Because the gum is a natural, locally available material, it preserves the biodegradability of the composite while delivering performance that synthetic additives struggle to match. The gum-bentonite pairing, though less effective mechanically, offers a distinct advantage in moisture control and degradation management, pointing toward applications in food packaging, where limiting water uptake also limits bacterial growth. The authors note that the gum-bentonite films could serve for more than 200 minutes in highly humid conditions with less than 10 percent water uptake. For a field searching for sustainable materials that balance strength, cost and environmental fate, the message is clear: sometimes the answers are literally dripping from the trees.</p>
<p>Beyond the headline results, the study offers a useful reminder of how locally sourced materials can shape materials science outcomes. The acacia exudate used in the films came from a traditional production unit in northern Cameroon, meaning the hardening additive required no synthetic chemistry to obtain. Similarly, the bentonite and glycerol were standard commercial reagents, while the starch itself was extracted from cassava tubers softened in water for five days, washed, filtered, and air-dried at ambient temperature. The entire production chain relies on low-energy processing, with gelatinization carried out at just 70 degrees Celsius and drying at 50 degrees Celsius over three days.</p>
<p>The choice of Ceiba pentandra as the cellulose source is also notable. The tree, identified with assistance from the National Herbarium in Yaoundé, was collected in Mbalmayo, the same region whose soil later served as the biodegradation medium. Acid hydrolysis of the extracted cellulose followed established protocols, using repeated hot-water washing cycles, neutralization with dilute sodium hydroxide, ultrasonic dispersion, and freeze-drying to yield the final NCE powder. This level of procedural detail matters for reproducibility, since the surface chemistry of hydrolyzed cellulose, including its sulfate ester content, strongly influences how well the particles bond with a starch matrix.</p>
<p>Methodologically, the team combined a broad characterization toolkit: Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction confirmed the presence and interactions of the additives, while coupled thermal analysis probed melting behavior and decomposition kinetics. Moisture uptake was tracked over 700 minutes in a controlled 87 percent relative humidity chamber, and mechanical response was quantified through stress-strain testing. The convergence of evidence from these independent techniques strengthens the authors&#8217; interpretation that acacia gum acts primarily as a bonding agent between polymer chains, whereas bentonite functions as a physical barrier to both heat and water transport within the composite films.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effects of acacia gum and bentonite additives on the mechanical, thermal, moisture and biodegradation properties of cassava starch and acid-hydrolyzed cellulose composite bioplastics</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Effects of acacia gum and bentonite on the properties of composite bioplastics made of starch and acid hydrolyzed cellulose</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Assonfack Lekane, H., Cheumani Yona, A. M., Tsague, F. L., Abo, T. M., Kuete, M. A., Ndinteh, D. T., Mbey, J. A., &amp; Ndikontar, M. K. (2026). Effects of acacia gum and bentonite on the properties of composite bioplastics made of starch and acid hydrolyzed cellulose. <em>Discover Industrial Chemistry and Materials, 1</em>(1), Article 15. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44508-026-00014-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44508-026-00014-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44508-026-00014-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44508-026-00014-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> bioplastics, cassava starch, acid-hydrolyzed cellulose, acacia gum, bentonite, biodegradation, moisture absorption, Young&#x27;s modulus, hydrogen bonding, thermal stability, nanocellulose, sustainable materials</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">186411</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
