The most striking example of this trend is a study by Choudhury and colleagues on targeted antimicrobial therapy against Fusobacterium nucleatum, an anaerobic bacterium that has attracted intense attention for its association with colorectal cancer. Rather than deploying broad-spectrum antibiotics that devastate beneficial gut flora, the team engineered Lactococcus lactis, a harmless dairy bacterium widely used in food fermentation, to deliver guided antimicrobial peptides, or gAMPs. These short, designed molecules carry built-in specificity: they are structured to bind and disrupt the membranes of the target pathogen while sparing closely related commensal species. In simulated gut environments, the engineered delivery system achieved selective inhibition of F. nucleatum with reduced toxicity and, crucially, preserved the overall diversity of the microbial community. That last point matters enormously. One of the persistent failures of conventional antibiotic treatment in the gut is collateral damage to the microbiota, which can open the door to opportunistic pathogens such as Clostridioides difficile. A living therapeutic that carries its own targeting logic, and that can be dosed as a probiotic, represents a fundamentally different pharmacological paradigm. The work also hints at a future in which engineered bacterial vectors are programmed to sense disease-associated niches and respond with localized, self-limiting antimicrobial activity, a vision the authors frame as a next-generation alternative to small-molecule drugs.

The probiotic theme continued to dominate engagement in a second area: immunometabolism and chronic inflammatory disease. Wang and colleagues reported that Lactobacillus paragasseri strain LG-1 modulates metabolism, restores microbiota balance, and reduces inflammation in chronic spontaneous urticaria, a debilitating skin condition characterized by recurrent hives and driven by dysregulated immune signalling. The study traced the strain’s effects through immune pathway regulation, connecting microbial metabolites to the suppression of the histamine-driven flare responses that define the disease. What makes this line of research compelling is its mechanistic depth: rather than simply documenting an association between a strain and symptom relief, the authors mapped the metabolic and immunological intermediaries through which the probiotic acts. Interest in therapeutic microbes is also driving parallel work on delivery technology. A study by Zhu and colleagues examined probiotic microencapsulation, the practice of wrapping live cells in protective polymer shells that shield them from stomach acid and release them at targeted sites in the intestine. Encapsulation addresses the central technical weakness of oral probiotics, poor viability during gastric transit, and its refinement is a prerequisite for the kind of personalized, strain-specific microbial therapeutics that the urticaria study points toward. Together these papers suggest that the probiotic field is maturing from a genre of dietary supplements into a discipline of rationally designed, encapsulated, and mechanistically characterized living medicines.

Followers engaged just as strongly with work that pointed off-world. Vidal and colleagues explored how Earth’s deep subsurface microbiome can inform the search for extraterrestrial life. Microorganisms thriving in extreme, low-energy environments kilometres beneath the planet’s surface, fractured rock aquifers where chemical energy, not sunlight, fuels life, provide the best available analogues for potential habitats on Mars and on icy moons such as Europa and Enceladus. The logic is straightforward: if life exists elsewhere in the solar system, it almost certainly survives under energy limitation, in dark, chemically fed ecosystems resembling Earth’s deep biosphere. The study’s conclusions carry practical weight for mission design. Extraterrestrial life, the authors argue, is likely to be slow-growing and metabolically sparse, which means it will be extraordinarily difficult to detect with conventional instruments. Populations that double on timescales of centuries or millennia leave faint chemical footprints, so biosignature identification must be refined, and detection technologies must become orders of magnitude more sensitive. The subsurface microbiome, in other words, is not just a biological curiosity; it is a training dataset for the instruments that may one day answer whether we are alone. The astronomical engagement numbers for this study suggest that astrobiology’s appeal remains unmatched, but its inclusion among the top-followed papers also reflects a genuine methodological convergence between geomicrobiology and planetary science.

Back on the surface, sustainable agriculture emerged as another follower favourite, centred on microbial volatile organic compounds. A review by Belt and colleagues examined VOCs as promising alternatives to chemical pesticides. These small, airborne molecules, produced naturally by beneficial rhizosphere bacteria and fungi, can inhibit plant pathogens at a distance, induce systemic resistance within plant tissues, and promote growth, all without leaving the toxic residues associated with synthetic agrochemicals. The technical promise is real, but so are the obstacles. Translating laboratory findings into field applications has proven difficult because VOC activity depends on soil type, moisture, temperature, and the composition of the resident microbial community, variables that fluctuate wildly outside the growth chamber. Detection is a further bottleneck: many bioactive volatiles are produced at nanomolar concentrations and require sophisticated analytical techniques such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to identify and quantify. The authors argue that future progress will depend on integrating ecological complexity into experimental design, moving beyond single-strain, single-pathogen assays toward multi-species systems that resemble real soil. The same momentum is visible in a complementary review by Xiong and colleagues from the group of Brajesh Singh, which situates these advances within the rapidly expanding field of soil microbiome research and its application to crop health. Together the two papers mark a shift in agricultural microbiology from description toward engineering: the goal is no longer merely to catalogue which microbes live around roots, but to deploy them, deliberately and predictably, as part of integrated pest management.

At the level of intracellular architecture, two further studies drew heavy engagement for what they reveal about bacterial organization and gene regulation. Chang and colleagues investigated bacterial microcompartments in Salmonella, protein-shelled organelles that sequester specific enzymatic pathways from the rest of the cytoplasm. By constructing engineered hybrid microcompartments, the team demonstrated that these structures can be used to reorganize metabolic pathways, co-locating enzymes and substrates in ways that improve flux and reduce unwanted cross-reactions. The implications extend into synthetic biology: BMCs are essentially programmable nanoreactors, and understanding how their shells, targeting sequences, and encapsulated enzymes assemble opens the door to designing custom metabolic modules inside industrially relevant bacteria. Complementing this structural perspective, Fernández-Fernández and colleagues examined how variability in promoter regions of epigenetically regulated operons enables bacteria to fine-tune gene expression and adapt rapidly to environmental pressures. Populations of bacteria, the study shows, maintain stochastic diversity in promoter architecture, generating a spectrum of expression states within a single clone; when conditions change, the individuals best suited to the new environment dominate. This bet-hedging strategy is a cornerstone of bacterial resilience, and deciphering its molecular mechanisms has direct consequences for one of the gravest threats in modern medicine. As a commentary by Brüssow emphasized, antibiotic resistance is expected to become the leading global cause of death worldwide by 2050, and understanding the regulatory logic that lets pathogens survive stress is essential to developing strategies that disarm rather than merely kill them.

Industrial biotechnology supplied the remaining high-engagement stories, and both point toward cheaper, faster, greener manufacturing. Matamouros and colleagues described a high-throughput platform for signal peptide screening in Corynebacterium glutamicum, the workhorse bacterium behind much of the world’s industrial amino acid production. Signal peptides are the short N-terminal sequences that direct proteins to the secretion machinery, and choosing the right one for a given recombinant protein has traditionally been a slow, empirical exercise. The new platform allows thousands of signal peptide-protein combinations to be tested in parallel, identifying optimal secretion routes in days rather than months. Because secreted proteins are far easier and cheaper to purify than intracellular ones, the platform directly reduces development time and manufacturing cost for enzymes, therapeutic proteins, and industrial biocatalysts. On the sustainability front, Zini and colleagues tackled one of the field’s enduring problems: producing bioplastics without sterile, energy-intensive fermentation infrastructure. Their solution was a hybrid microbiome approach, integrating engineered cyanobacteria that photosynthetically fix carbon into biodegradable plastic precursors within natural microbial communities. The resulting consortia proved robust under scalable, non-sterile conditions, sidestepping the contamination vulnerabilities that make conventional pure-culture fermentation expensive. If such systems can be scaled further, they offer a route to plastics production that runs on sunlight and mixed microbial communities rather than refined sugar feedstocks and aseptic facilities.

Taken together, the follower-selected collection tells a coherent story about where microbiology is heading. The most resonant work of the period shares three characteristics: it is mechanism-rich, connecting molecular detail to physiological outcomes; it is application-oriented, targeting cancer-associated pathogens, chronic inflammatory disease, crop protection, and industrial production; and it is engineered, whether the object being engineered is a probiotic genome, a protein shell, a signal peptide library, or an entire synthetic-natural consortium. The editorial exercise itself, letting social-media engagement guide a review of the field, is also a signal. Scientific communities are no longer passive recipients of published knowledge; they are active curators, and their collective attention is proving to be a surprisingly reliable compass for the discipline’s future. As microbial innovation accelerates across medicine, agriculture, energy, and industry, the studies that rise to the top of the feed suggest that the field’s centre of gravity is shifting from understanding microbes to building with them, and that the solutions to some of today’s most pressing global challenges may well be microscopic, living, and designed.

The researchers embarked on a quest to enhance the enzymatic efficiency of cutinase, an enzyme produced by Aspergillus tubingensis, through advanced computational techniques. Cutinases have been identified as vital biocatalysts in the breakdown of various esters, and their application in PET biodegradation presents a sustainable alternative to conventional plastic waste management strategies. By employing in silico methods, the team aimed to fine-tune the cutinase enzyme, improving its ability to break down the recalcitrant PET polymer.

In silico engineering involves simulating and modeling the molecular dynamics of enzymes to understand their structure-function relationship better. The research team utilized state-of-the-art software to analyze the cutinase enzyme’s properties, allowing them to predict how specific modifications could enhance its catalytic activity against PET substrates. This approach not only reduces the time and resources typically required for experimental enzyme engineering but also provides insights into the enzyme’s behavior in a controlled environment.

The findings of this research are particularly significant considering the environmental impact of PET. The accumulation of plastic waste in landfills and oceans poses a severe threat to ecosystems and human health. Traditional methods of plastic disposal, such as incineration and landfill burial, often lead to more pollution rather than alleviating the problem. Therefore, employing biological solutions like enhanced cutinase presents a novel and environmentally friendly strategy for tackling plastic waste.

The engineering process applied to the cutinase enzyme involved several key modifications aimed at increasing its thermal and pH stability. These modifications are crucial for ensuring that the enzyme remains active in various environmental conditions, enhancing its practical application in real-world biodegradation scenarios. By optimizing the enzyme’s stability, the researchers hoped to facilitate large-scale applications of this biocatalyst in PET recycling and biodegradation processes.

The research team conducted a series of experimental validations to assess the efficacy of the engineered cutinase. These experiments involved subjecting the modified enzyme to PET substrates and monitoring the rate of degradation over time. Initial results revealed that the engineered cutinase exhibited a significantly higher activity compared to the wild-type enzyme. The accelerated breakdown of PET not only underscores the potential of biocatalysts in managing plastic waste but also highlights the importance of enzyme engineering in enhancing biodegradation rates.

Moreover, the implications of this research extend beyond merely improving PET biodegradation. The insights gained from the in silico engineering approach can be applied to other enzymes involved in the degradation of various pollutants. This versatility in application can lead to substantial advancements in bioremediation practices, paving the way for innovative solutions to combat diverse environmental pollutants generated by industrial processes.

As the scientists delve deeper into the molecular mechanics of cutinase, they are also exploring how this knowledge can be integrated into existing recycling frameworks. The goal is not only to create more effective enzymes but also to develop comprehensive strategies that incorporate these biocatalysts into recycling operations. The ultimate vision is a circular economy where waste plastics are continually repurposed, contributing to sustainable development.

Future research will undoubtedly build upon the findings of this study, exploring additional facets of enzyme engineering. Investigating the synergistic effects that might arise from combining multiple enzymes could further enhance PET biodegradation rates. Additionally, the long-term stability and efficacy of the engineered enzymes will be critical in determining their viability for commercial applications. Challenges such as enzyme cost, scalability, and integration into existing waste management systems must also be addressed to realize the full potential of biotechnological solutions to plastic pollution.

As the research community continues to prioritize innovative solutions for climate change and environmental sustainability, studies like this one serve as a beacon of hope. The integration of biotechnology in addressing global plastic pollution exemplifies how science can provide tangible benefits to the planet. With further advancements and collaborations across disciplines, the dream of significantly reducing plastic waste in the environment might soon become a reality.

The potential impact of this study extends to policy implications as well. As society becomes increasingly aware of environmental issues, there is a growing demand for sustainable practices that can be reflected in legislative measures. By presenting empirical data demonstrating the efficiency of engineered enzymes for biodegradation, researchers can advocate for policies that promote the funding and development of biotechnological interventions in waste management.

Furthermore, educational outreach based on such studies can inspire the next generation of scientists and environmental advocates. By highlighting the importance of combining science with environmental stewardship, this research can intrigue young minds about the possibilities within the field of biotechnology. Fostering a culture of innovation and sustainability through education will ultimately lead to a collective movement toward a cleaner, healthier planet.

In conclusion, the in silico engineering of Aspergillus tubingensis cutinase marks a significant stride in bioengineering for environmental sustainability. The efficient biodegradation of PET is not just a scientific achievement; it represents a crucial turning point in the fight against plastic pollution. As we look to the future, embracing such biotechnological advancements will be pivotal in heralding a new era of waste management solutions, paving the way for healthier ecosystems and sustainable living.

Subject of Research: In silico engineering of cutinase from Aspergillus tubingensis to enhance PET biodegradation potential.

Article Title: In silico engineering of Aspergillus tubingensis cutinase to enhance PET biodegradation potential.

Article References:
Azarudeen, A., Richard, S.P., Periyasamy, T.S. et al. In silico engineering of Aspergillus tubingensis cutinase to enhance PET biodegradation potential.
Environ Sci Pollut Res (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-37179-5

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-37179-5

Keywords: PET biodegradation, Aspergillus tubingensis, cutinase, enzyme engineering, biocatalysts, environmental sustainability, plastic pollution, in silico modeling, biotechnology, bioremediation.

The scale of plastic production is staggering, with the industry accounting for nearly $1 trillion and producing over 400 million metric tons annually. However, the recycling rate remains alarmingly low, approximately 10%. This statistic underscores the urgent need for innovative approaches to plastic alternatives. One such approach is being led by Karthik Sankaranarayanan, an assistant professor at Purdue University specializing in agricultural and biological engineering. His research team, supported by NSF funding, aims to design novel enzymes that can convert diverse biomaterials into biodegradable plastics, specifically, polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs).

PHAs are particularly noteworthy as they promise mechanical properties comparable to traditional plastics but are cultivated from renewable resources such as corn, sugar, and agricultural waste rather than relying on petroleum-based chemicals, which dominate the market. This shift not only fosters sustainability but also enhances the U.S. supply chain’s independence from imported oil and gas. Sankaranarayanan emphasizes that nearly all plastics currently in production are petroleum-based, which raises concerns about the environmental impact and economic dependencies involved in their manufacture and disposal.

While PHAs have been known for nearly a century, their application has been limited due to challenges such as fragility and unstable behavior at high temperatures. The research team is working to enhance these polymers’ thermal stability and mechanical strength, which would expand their applicability from packaging to biomedical devices. By using advanced biocatalysis techniques, the research aims to leverage enzymes that can facilitate specific reactions, producing the desired bioplastics without the need for harsh chemicals or extreme processing conditions that are common in traditional plastic manufacturing.

A critical component of this research involves developing computational tools to identify optimal opportunities for biocatalysis. The knowledge-driven approach will allow researchers to select suitable enzymes and chemical reactions necessary for creating effective bioplastic materials. Once these enzymes are engineered, they will undergo rigorous testing to ensure that they perform efficiently in producing the necessary bioplastics.

As the project unfolds, it will progress through various phases, where each participating university will focus on different aspects of the enzyme design and testing process. For instance, researchers at the University of California, San Francisco, are set to engineer the enzymes using cutting-edge protein computational design techniques, tapping into deep learning methodologies that draw upon patterns similar to those recognized by the human brain. This sophisticated approach will enhance the potential for creating robust enzymes capable of bioplastic synthesis.

Further down the pipeline, Stanford University will evaluate the engineered enzymes for their functionality, which is critical for ensuring that the enzymes can effectively catalyze the desired biochemical reactions. Subsequent analysis at Purdue will assess the reaction rates and the ability to adjust the chemical characteristics of the resultant polymers. The final phase involves collaboration with researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, who will analyze the properties of the produced bioplastics and explore their commercialization avenues, including scaling up production through engineered microorganisms.

One of the challenges highlighted by Sankaranarayanan involves the enzymes’ DNA makeup, specifically, a high guanine and cytosine content. This characteristic complicates synthetic manufacturing processes required for large-scale enzyme production. The partnership with Twist Bioscience is critical, as they will bring in technological advancements to facilitate the engineering of these complex enzymes, allowing researchers to overcome significant hurdles that currently limit synthetic biology.

Moreover, this project aims to catalyze innovation not just within the research teams but also to foster educational opportunities for students. Three graduate students have already been integrated into the project, with plans to recruit undergraduates from diverse fields, including agricultural and biological engineering, computer science, and chemistry. This educational aspect enriches the research environment and cultivates future leaders in the field of sustainable engineering.

Another noteworthy strategy employed by the team will be to maintain transparency and open-access methodologies in their research. By providing open-source access to their computational tools and workflows, the team aims to ensure that their innovations can be adapted beyond bioplastics, benefiting various sectors such as pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and more. Furthermore, they plan to conduct workshops focused on protein design, strengthening the educational component of the project and enhancing knowledge transfer across institutions.

As the research moves forward, the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration is underscored. Experts from multiple universities are contributing unique competencies, thereby expanding the boundaries of scientific discovery. This collaboration not only enhances the quality of the research but also provides a rich environment for academic exchange and practical learning experiences for students involved in the project.

Initiatives like this, funded by the NSF’s Directorate for Technology, Innovation and Partnerships, represent a crucial shift towards creating sustainable industrial practices. They align with global imperatives to reduce plastic waste and its ecological impact. As the project progresses, it serves as a beacon of hope, working to pave the way for a future where bioplastics can reliably replace traditional plastics—capable of reconciling environmental responsibility with economic viability.

Ultimately, the ambition to create fully recyclable bioplastics underlines a transformative shift in how we conceive of materials and their role within our society. By harnessing the power of synthetic biology and advanced engineering, researchers are not just solving a pressing environmental issue; they are redefining the landscape of material science in profoundly impactful ways.

In conclusion, the landscape of plastics is on the brink of a revolution. As innovative researchers like Sankaranarayanan lead the charge towards practical, sustainable alternatives, the potential consequences of their work could resonate throughout numerous industries and ecosystems. With collaboration, ingenuity, and a commitment to transparent practices, the quest for biodegradable options in material science may indeed yield the solutions needed to substitute harmful plastics with environmentally friendly replacements.

Subject of Research: Development of biodegradable bioplastics using enzymes derived from renewable resources.
Article Title: From Waste to Resource: The Future of Bioplastics and Sustainable Manufacturing
News Publication Date: October 2023
Web References: Purdue University
References: U.S. National Science Foundation grants, research articles on bioplastics and enzyme design.
Image Credits: Purdue University/John Underwood

Keywords

Biodegradable plastics, enzyme design, protein design, biomanufacturing, polyketide synthases, sustainable engineering, biocatalysis, polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), synthetic biology, material science, environmental sustainability, advanced manufacturing.

By John Lovett

University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture

Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station

FAYETTEVILLE, Ark. — While biodegradable plastics currently account for a half percent of the hundreds of millions of tons of plastic produced annually, a growing demand for the alternative reflects consumer awareness and corporate response.

Researchers from Brazil, Germany and the United States document a multi-faceted global snapshot of the environmental aspects and trends surrounding single-use plastics in a review article titled “Rethinking single-use plastics: Innovations, policies, consumer awareness and market shaping biodegradable plastics in the packaging industry.” The piece was recently published in Trends in Food Science & Technology.

The researchers state that the largest area of application for biodegradable plastic materials is the packaging segment, which accounts for about half of single-use plastic production. The biodegradable packaging market was estimated to reach about $105 billion in 2024 with an expected annual growth rate of about 6 percent between 2024 and 2029, and 44 percent of patents filed worldwide for biodegradable polymers relate to packaging, the study noted.

About 474 million tons of plastics are produced globally each year, and about a third of it is used for packaging, including single-use plastic products for food and beverage containers. Of this, only about 25 percent gets recycled. Plastic production, the article adds, is expected to triple by 2060 following a trend of transitioning from durable plastics to single-use plastics.

Global plastic production has increased from 369 million tons in 2016 to 404.5 million tons in 2020, partly due to materials used in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Citing a 2021 study from the same research group in Brazil, the review article noted the pandemic “exacerbated the use of single-use plastic and increased the demand for personal protective equipment and packaging, leading to remarkable growth in the plastics industry and generating more than 8 million tons of waste, mainly affecting Asia, Europe and America.” The same study mentions that the pandemic expanded food packaging due to a shift in eating habits and an increase in online purchases.

Despite the transition to single-use plastics, an increasing number of patents and successful research and development of biodegradable plastic materials has sparked the interest of industries to invest in large-scale production technologies for renewable monomers and polymers, the researchers added.

Looking to corn

“There is a lot of opportunity with zein, which is a family of proteins in corn that forms a beautiful film to make biodegradable plastics, and it’s a little bit more expensive, but we hope that will be hitting the market soon as well,” said Sun Ferreira, a co-author of the study and an assistant professor in the food science department for University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture and the Dale Bumpers College of Agricultural, Food and Life Sciences. Ferreira is part of both the research and extension arms of the Division of Agriculture, the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station and the Cooperative Extension Service.

Ferreira is a food scientist and food processing engineer who has worked with biopolymers for microencapsulation to protect flavors, vitamins and other ingredients during processing, storage and digestion. He collaborated with the study’s lead author, Andreza Salles Barone, a nutritionist and Ph.D. candidate with the Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro’s Food and Nutrition Graduate Program.

Barone is supervised by Ana Elizabeth Cavalcante Fai, corresponding author for the review article, a food engineer and associate professor in food science at Rio de Janeiro State University, where she coordinates the Laboratory of Multidisciplinary Practices for Sustainability at the Institute of Nutrition.

“Food packaging plays a vital role in ensuring food safety and quality,” Fai said. “However, it is increasingly unjustifiable to produce short-life cycle packaging using synthetic plastics that persist in the environment for up to 400 years. Even more concerning is the growing awareness that plastics don’t degrade completely — they fragment into micro- and nano plastics, which are now recognized as widespread environmental pollutants and an emerging public health concern.”

Ferreira said that while biodegradable plastics are a promising long-term alternative solution, it is not where he expects to see the biggest short-term impact on the reduction of overall plastic use.

Fai and Barone said that plastic has undeniably transformed modern life since its mass production began in the 1950s. However, despite its versatility and usefulness, “plastic has often been misused and is frequently applied to single-use items which are discarded with little regard for environmental consequences.”

“Most of the plastic ever made still exists in some form today,” Fai said. “When people say, ‘just throw it away,’ we must remember – there is no ‘away.’ Everything remains within the boundaries of our shared environment. The planet simply cannot absorb this volume of waste indefinitely. If current trends continue, some projections estimate that by 2050, there could be more plastic than fish in our oceans. This is not just alarming — it’s a call to urgent action.”

A “circular economy,” Ferreira said, could have a larger long-term impact on single-use plastic reduction. A circular economy broadens the familiar slogan of “reduce, reuse, recycle” to “rethink, refuse, reduce, reuse, repair and recycle”, in that order.

Brazil has an extraordinary biodiversity, Fai said, and a significant agro-industrial biomass base, rich in polysaccharides such as starch, pectin, lignin, and others. These valuable raw materials can be transformed into bio-based and biodegradable packaging for the food industry, she added.

“Through international partnerships, where each research group contributes its unique expertise, we can join efforts to develop sustainable and innovative packaging solutions,” Fai said. “This collaborative approach is key to building a more sustainable future for food systems worldwide,” said Fai and Barone.

“We are part of the problem as consumers, but at the end of the day, as consumers we can be part of the solution,” Ferreira said.

Co-authors of the review article on single-use plastics include Carollyne Maragoni-Santos of Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro; Patricia Marques de Farias of the Sustainable Packaging Institute in Germany; Camila Marcolongo Gomes Cortat of the Laboratory of Multidisciplinary Practices of Sustainability, Institute of Nutrition at the State University of Rio de Janeiro; Bianca Chieregato Maniglia of the University of São Paulo; and Ricardo Schmitz Ongaratto in the chemistry school at Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.

Plastics on the farm

Heather Friedrich, director of the Center for Arkansas Farms and Food, said while there are a lot of plastics used in agriculture, her team avoids single-use plastics as much as possible out of concern for the environment and to reduce consumption.

“In our transplant production, rather than using the single-use plastics that you see in a store when you get plants, we use extra sturdy plastic transplant trays,” Friedrich said. “We know farmers who have used these for 20-plus years and are still strong.”

Friedrich said the CAFF farm also uses a paper pot system adapted from Japan that uses a chain of paper strips to form cells in which they grow the transplants. The training farm also uses a landscape fabric instead of plastic mulch for weed control, which can be reused over many years.

However, use of single-use plastic is unavoidable at times. For its “tractor-scale” production, CAFF uses the black plastic seen on strawberry beds at u-pick operations.

“Plants respond well to plasticulture because it warms the soil early, creates a weed free zone and delivers water directly to the plant roots,” Friedrich said. “The current biodegradable options for this function can’t hold up over the long, hot season.”

A thick, clear plastic is used to cover high tunnels at the farm, but that material has a longer lifespan of four to six years. High tunnels differ from greenhouses by generally having less climate control but still allow protection of plants from the elements and extend the growing season from early spring to late fall.

Irrigation drip tape — a flat tubing that provides water directly to plant roots — can also be a source of plastic on the farm, Friedrich said, and they try to use theirs for multiple years to minimize landfill deposits.

“In other areas of the state, there are recycling options that farmers can off-load their irrigation plastic,” Friedrich said.

Polypipe is commonly used for irrigation in row crop operations. When the season has ended, farmers roll up the pipe and drop it off for recycling.

The Center for Arkansas Farms and Food was developed to strengthen and expand our food and farming system by providing new opportunities to shape our current and future farmers, food entrepreneurs and food system leaders. CAFF is a program of the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station through the University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture.

Through experiential learning, the center’s programs train farmers and food entrepreneurs with the production and business skills and resources necessary to develop resilient businesses that sustain our ecosystem, our land and our communities.

To learn more about the Division of Agriculture research, visit the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station website. Follow us on X at @ArkAgResearch, subscribe to the Food, Farms and Forests podcast and sign up for our monthly newsletter, the Arkansas Agricultural Research Report. To learn more about the Division of Agriculture, visit uada.edu. Follow us on X at @AgInArk. To learn about extension programs in Arkansas, contact your local Cooperative Extension Service agent or visit uaex.uada.edu.

About the Division of Agriculture

The University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture’s mission is to strengthen agriculture, communities, and families by connecting trusted research to the adoption of best practices. Through the Agricultural Experiment Station and the Cooperative Extension Service, the Division of Agriculture conducts research and extension work within the nation’s historic land grant education system. 

The Division of Agriculture is one of 20 entities within the University of Arkansas System. It has offices in all 75 counties in Arkansas and faculty on three system campuses.  

Pursuant to 7 CFR § 15.3, the University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture offers all its Extension and Research programs and services (including employment) without regard to race, color, sex, national origin, religion, age, disability, marital or veteran status, genetic information, sexual preference, pregnancy or any other legally protected status, and is an equal opportunity institution.

Journal

Trends in Food Science & Technology

DOI

10.1016/j.tifs.2025.104906