<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>benign vs malignant sacral tumor detection &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/benign-vs-malignant-sacral-tumor-detection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 07:38:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>AI Reads Tumor Sub-Regions on Plain CT Scans to Tell Benign from Malignant Sacral Tumors Before Surgery</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/ai-reads-tumor-sub-regions-on-plain-ct-scans-to-tell-benign-from-malignant-sacral-tumors-before-surgery/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ophelia Keating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 07:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI tumor sub-region analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI-assisted skeletal tumor diagnosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benign vs malignant sacral tumor detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMC Medical Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrast-free CT scan tumor differentiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early detection of sacral malignancies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habitat imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imaging-based tumor sub-region segmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K-means clustering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine learning in bone tumor imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical imaging for tumor characterization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-layer perceptron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nomogram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-contrast CT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-invasive sacral tumor diagnosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peri-tumoral micro-environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preoperative sacral tumor assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiology AI for spinal tumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sacral tumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sacrally situated tumors classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tumor heterogeneity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=264038</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A Chinese research team has shown that machine learning analysis of tumor sub-regions and surrounding tissue on non-contrast CT scans can accurately distinguish benign from malignant sacral tumors before surgery.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sacral tumors are among the most diagnostically treacherous lesions in skeletal imaging. Nestled at the base of the spine, where the sacrum connects the pelvic bones, they are rare, anatomically awkward to biopsy, and notorious for looking deceptively similar whether they are harmless growths or aggressive malignancies. Patients often report the same vague symptoms, low back pain, sacral discomfort, and radiating leg pain, regardless of what is actually growing inside the bone. On conventional images, the overlap in appearance between benign and malignant sacral lesions has long forced surgeons into a difficult choice: operate aggressively on something that might have been watchable, or wait on something that might spread. A new study from researchers at Peking University People&#8217;s Hospital, published in BMC Medical Imaging, reports that an artificial intelligence approach built on ordinary, contrast-free CT scans can substantially sharpen that judgment before a single incision is made.</p>
<p>The research team, led by co-first authors Fei Zheng and Wenjia Zhang under the senior authorship of Ping Yin and Nan Hong, set out to address a specific and practical problem. Pre-operative differentiation between benign and malignant sacral tumors is essential for guiding treatment strategy, yet the similarity of clinical symptoms and imaging characteristics reduces the specificity and accuracy of conventional assessments of bone malignancy. Their solution does not require new scanners, injected contrast agents, or additional radiation exposure. Instead, it extracts far more information than radiologists can perceive by eye from the non-contrast computed tomography images that these patients often already receive.</p>
<p>The study enrolled 112 patients whose sacral tumors were ultimately confirmed by pathology between July 2021 and September 2023, providing a ground-truth backbone against which every algorithmic prediction could be measured. The investigators drew regions of interest around each tumor on the CT scans and then applied a technique known as habitat radiomics. The underlying premise is that a tumor is not a uniform blob of tissue; it is a patchwork of biologically distinct sub-regions, each with its own density, texture, and microarchitecture. On a CT image, these sub-regions express themselves as subtle differences in Hounsfield units, the standard measure of radiodensity, that are invisible to casual inspection but statistically robust when quantified systematically.</p>
<p>To capture that internal heterogeneity, the team used K-means clustering, a classic unsupervised machine learning algorithm, to partition each tumor into three spatial habitats. K-means works by iteratively grouping voxels, the three-dimensional pixels of the CT volume, into clusters based on how similar their intensity patterns are, so that each habitat represents a compartment of relatively homogeneous imaging behavior within the tumor. The number of clusters was selected with statistical validation, referenced in the paper through the Calinski-Harabasz criterion, which rewards partitions that are tight within clusters and well separated from one another. The result is a digital map of the tumor&#8217;s internal architecture rather than a single averaged measurement of the whole lesion.</p>
<p>The innovation did not stop at the tumor&#8217;s edge. The researchers also deliberately extended their analysis outward into the tissue surrounding the lesion, dilating the tumor regions by thicknesses of 3 millimeters and 6 millimeters to create peri-tumoral shells. This choice reflects a growing recognition in imaging science that malignant processes remodel their surroundings, altering the density and texture of adjacent bone and soft tissue in ways that benign lesions typically do not. By comparing models built on the narrower 3-millimeter band with those built on the wider 6-millimeter band, the team could test empirically how much diagnostic signal resides just beyond the visible tumor margin. Their findings favored the tighter band: a Multi-Layer Perceptron, a type of neural network, based on the 3-millimeter peri-tumoral region exhibited enhanced performance relative to the one using the 6-millimeter region.</p>
<p>The feature extraction pipeline drew on the established vocabulary of radiomics, quantifying first-order statistics of voxel intensities, textural patterns that describe how densities are spatially arranged, and finer structural descriptors. To keep the models honest and generalizable, the researchers used Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator, or LASSO, regularization, a technique that penalizes model complexity and drives the coefficients of uninformative features toward zero, leaving a compact set of genuinely predictive measurements. Multiple machine learning architectures were compared, including logistic regression, random forests, support vector machines, and the Multi-Layer Perceptron, with reproducibility of feature measurements checked through correlation coefficients before modeling began.</p>
<p>The headline result concerned the habitats model. A Multi-Layer Perceptron trained on the three-habitat partition of the tumor achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, or AUC, of 0.877 in the test cohort, outperforming a model based on the conventional whole-tumor region of interest. An AUC of that magnitude indicates that the model ranks a randomly chosen malignant tumor as more suspicious than a randomly chosen benign one nearly nine times out of ten. That the habitat-based approach beat the standard whole-lesion analysis is the study&#8217;s central conceptual message: the spatial arrangement of a tumor&#8217;s internal sub-regions carries diagnostic information that averaging across the entire lesion destroys.</p>
<p>But the researchers went one step further, assembling what they call an ensemble nomogram. This fusion model integrated three streams of information: the patient&#8217;s age, a clinical indicator with recognized relevance to sacral tumor biology; the peri-tumoral radiomic features from the 3-millimeter shell; and the habitat-derived signatures from within the tumor. The ensemble achieved the study&#8217;s best performance, an AUC of 0.892 in the test sets, and it did so by a statistically meaningful margin, significantly outperforming a model built on clinical data alone, which managed only an AUC of 0.619 with a P value of 0.02. For context, a clinical-only model at 0.619 is only modestly better than a coin flip, while the fused model approaches the performance threshold at which a test becomes genuinely actionable in the clinic.</p>
<p>Accuracy alone, however, is not enough for a predictive model to earn clinical trust, and the authors addressed this with two complementary assessments. Calibration curves, evaluated with Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics and mean standard error, demonstrated good concordance between what the nomogram predicted and what pathologists actually observed, meaning that when the model says a tumor has a seventy percent chance of being malignant, roughly seventy percent of such tumors truly are malignant. Decision curve analysis, meanwhile, revealed a high overall net benefit across a clinically relevant range of threshold probabilities, indicating that patients and physicians acting on the nomogram&#8217;s predictions would, on balance, make better decisions than they would under default strategies of treating everyone or treating no one.</p>
<p>The practical implications reach well beyond the radiology reading room. A reliable pre-operative classification can influence whether a surgeon pursues wide en bloc resection, a morbid but potentially curative procedure for malignancies, or a more conservative intralesional approach appropriate for benign lesions, as well as informing the decision to obtain a biopsy beforehand. Because the method relies on non-contrast CT, it avoids the cost, contrast exposure, and contraindications associated with enhanced imaging, making it deployable in settings where advanced modalities are scarce. The authors conclude that NCCT-based habitat and peri-tumoral radiomics markedly improve preoperative prediction of benign and malignant sacral tumors, with habitat signatures offering precise predictions capable of guiding personalized treatment. As with any retrospective single-center study of 112 patients, external validation across larger and more diverse cohorts will be the necessary next step, but the work demonstrates that a routine CT scan, read through the eyes of a machine, can surface biological distinctions that clinicians have spent decades trying to see.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Pre-operative classification of benign and malignant sacral tumors using habitat and peri-tumoral radiomics from non-contrast CT</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> NCCT-based habitats and peri-tumoral radiomics enhance pre-operative prediction of benign and malignant sacral tumors</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Zheng, F., Zhang, W., Liang, K., Liu, T., Yin, P., &amp; Hong, N. (2026). NCCT-based habitats and peri-tumoral radiomics enhance pre-operative prediction of benign and malignant sacral tumors. <em>BMC Medical Imaging</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02806-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02806-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02806-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s12880-026-02806-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> sacral tumor, radiomics, habitat imaging, non-contrast CT, machine learning, Multi-Layer Perceptron, K-means clustering, peri-tumoral micro-environment, nomogram, tumor heterogeneity, AUC, BMC Medical Imaging</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">264038</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
