The investigation, detailed in the Singapore Medical Journal, presents compelling data illustrating that a striking 77 percent of adults experiencing anxiety or depressive symptoms have not sought assistance from mental health professionals such as psychiatrists, psychologists, or social workers. This pervasive reticence underscores the existing barriers within traditional healthcare paradigms, where stigma and apprehension often inhibit proactive engagement. Notably, however, 62 percent of these individuals expressed willingness to engage in peer support mechanisms—a non-clinical, relatable form of assistance emphasizing shared experiences and empathetic connections.

Peer support, as conceptualized in this study, offers an alternative or complementary pathway to conventional mental health services. It provides a relational platform where individuals process their struggles through the lens of communal understanding, potentially remedying what many describe as the intimidating nature of professional care. The preference for peer interactions seems to alleviate psychological barriers through informal and empathetic exchanges, fostering a sense of shared journey and collective resilience that often transcends clinical boundaries.

Moreover, the study delves into the modalities preferred by those receptive to peer support. With 51 percent favoring one-on-one interactions over group settings, and 43 percent indicating a preference for virtual support avenues, there arises a clear mandate to innovate flexible, accessible, and personalized peer-support structures. These preferences highlight the nuanced needs within mental health communities, emphasizing the importance of tailoring programs to individual comfort levels and logistical realities, especially amidst the digital shift catalyzed by modern communication technologies.

Assistant Professor Irene Teo from Duke-NUS’s Lien Centre for Palliative Care underscored the psychological impediments that peer support could help overcome. She highlighted how fear of stigma and judgment cultivates hesitance toward professional help, rendering peer connection—a less formal, more relatable intervention—a potentially transformative solution in mental health outreach. This insight reiterates the significance of designing mental health initiatives that do not merely inform but actively resonate with psychological readiness and emotional safety.

Demographically, the willingness to embrace peer support is stratified by age and occupational factors. Younger adults demonstrate higher acceptance levels, likely reflecting generational shifts marked by increased awareness and destigmatization of mental health issues. Concurrently, those with prior experiences of professional care exhibited greater openness to peer-based alternatives, suggesting a complementary relationship where formal and informal supports coalesce into a holistic continuum of care.

Interestingly, the study also reveals occupational disparities in attitudes toward peer support. Individuals occupying white-collar managerial roles expressed greater receptivity compared to their non-managerial counterparts in clerical or sales positions. This divergence could be attributed to elevated health literacy, compounded stress levels intrinsic to leadership roles, and a deficit of informal support networks in senior professional environments. Such findings prompt reflections on workplace mental health dynamics and the potential for peer-based interventions to mitigate occupational stressors.

The data was systematically garnered via an online survey involving 350 Singaporean adults, integrated within a larger initiative examining the economic ramifications of anxiety and depression. This methodological approach enabled the researchers to capture a representative snapshot of mental health attitudes within a contemporary urban Asian context, facilitating nuanced analyses that bridge epidemiological insights and sociocultural factors.

Professor Eric Finkelstein, the senior author and Executive Director of the Lien Centre for Palliative Care at Duke-NUS, emphasized the imperative for mental health solutions to eschew a monolithic design. Instead, they must incorporate diverse, dynamic elements that balance emotional sustenance, practical guidance, and protective safeguards. His remarks underscore the complexity of mental health care, advocating for systems adaptable enough to reconcile a spectrum of individualized needs and risk profiles.

Confidentiality concerns and skepticism regarding professional care often engender reticence among those in need; thus, peer support heralds an essential component in a comprehensive mental health strategy. By addressing these apprehensions, peer networks can serve as a bridge, fostering initial engagement and preparing individuals for more structured therapeutic interventions when appropriate, hence bridging gaps in accessibility and trust.

Echoing this perspective, Associate Professor Daniel Fung of IMH highlighted how wellbeing evolves antecedent to clinical engagements. He illustrated how many Singaporeans eschew medical labels but deeply yearn to be acknowledged and understood. Peer support, therefore, capitalizes on this humanistic need, facilitating connections that imbue practical coping mechanisms and inspirational narratives rooted in lived experience. Such relational frameworks transcend conventional health services, charting a pathway toward readiness and empowerment.

Professor Sheemei Lok, Duke-NUS’s Interim Vice-Dean for Research, reinforced the communal role in mental health landscapes. By deciphering the contexts and formats through which individuals feel safe seeking help, her commentary stresses the import of designing inclusive and empathetic infrastructures that collaboratively amplify professional care’s reach and efficacy.

This study’s implications extend beyond Singapore’s borders, providing a scalable model for integrating peer support into mental health ecosystems globally. As mental health challenges intensify worldwide, harnessing community-centered interventions that prioritize accessibility, relatability, and adaptability may fundamentally transform public engagement with mental health services. The research heralds a paradigm shift from isolated clinical applications toward hybridized care systems that collectively address multifaceted psychosocial dimensions of mental illness.

Ultimately, this investigation underscores how mental health is intricately woven into social fabric, individual psychology, and cultural attitudes. By recognizing peer support as a vital adjunct to clinical care, healthcare systems can better facilitate early intervention, reduce stigma, and empower individuals in their journeys toward recovery and sustained wellbeing. The evolving narrative positions peer support not merely as a supplementary service but as an integral pillar within a holistic and person-centered mental health framework.

Subject of Research: People

Article Title: Interest in peer support among Singaporean adults with symptoms of anxiety and depression

News Publication Date: 23 June 2026

Web References:
https://journals.lww.com/smj/fulltext/9900/interest_in_peer_support_among_singaporean_adults.274.aspx

References:
DOI: 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2025-104

Image Credits: Duke-NUS Medical School

Keywords: Mental health, depression, anxiety, peer support, community-based care, Singapore, psychological barriers, stigma, informal mental health care

Psychosis, a serious psychiatric condition that typically first presents in late adolescence or early adulthood, affects around three percent of the U.S. population. One of the greatest challenges in managing psychosis lies in the delay between symptom onset and treatment, which averages over 70 weeks nationwide. Such delays often exacerbate symptom severity and lead to worse functional outcomes. Given that college students fall squarely within this critical age window, understanding their treatment patterns is vital for public health approaches aimed at mitigating long-term disability and societal costs associated with psychosis.

The study, published in the journal Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, employed extensive analysis of the Healthy Minds Study data, which surveys mental health among college students across the United States. Investigators specifically focused on responses from 2,819 students who reported a psychosis diagnosis between 2015 and 2024. The research sought to quantify treatment utilization, examine perceived need for services, and assess the role of informal support in facilitating or hindering access to recommended care modalities, including antipsychotic medication and therapy.

Findings reveal a paradoxical landscape: approximately 80 percent of surveyed students acknowledged they needed support for their mental health concerns, and a similar proportion sought therapy or counseling within the preceding year. However, only around 40 percent reported the use of antipsychotic medication, despite clinical guidelines emphasizing the efficacy of combined pharmacological and psychotherapeutic approaches in managing psychotic disorders. This discrepancy points towards systemic obstacles such as stigma, lack of medication access, or possible apprehensions about medication side effects that may deter students from full-fledged treatment engagement.

These results underscore the importance of early identification and intervention in psychosis among college populations. Early and sustained treatment with both antipsychotic medications and counseling has been shown to reduce symptom severity, enhance quality of life, improve school and occupational functioning, and lower relapse risk. Thus, the underuse of antipsychotic drugs in this group could contribute to poorer disease trajectories and increased burden on health systems and educational institutions alike.

A particularly illuminating aspect of the study was the exploration of support networks’ influence on treatment-seeking behaviors. Students who believed they needed help and perceived encouragement from friends, family, health professionals, or campus personnel were more likely to adhere to treatment recommendations, including medication. Conversely, individuals who felt pressured or coerced into seeking help, such as through institutionalization mandates, showed diminished engagement. This finding suggests that fostering voluntary, supportive environments may enhance adherence and patients’ subjective health experiences.

Moreover, the researchers highlight how internalized stigma and skepticism about treatment efficacy remain formidable barriers. Mental health stigma within college campuses can silence early disclosure of symptoms and dissuade students from accessing comprehensive care. National awareness campaigns like Mental Health Awareness Month spearheaded by organizations such as the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) aim to combat these challenges, but the persistence of treatment gaps calls for more targeted strategies tailored to populations with psychotic disorders.

The research team advocates for future longitudinal studies to examine long-term outcomes associated with voluntary treatment-seeking encouraged by informal supports versus mandated interventions. Better understanding these nuances could inform policies and programs designed to build patient-centered care frameworks that prioritize autonomy and constructive social support while ensuring timely initiation of evidence-based treatment.

Additionally, clarifying the multifaceted barriers obstructing antipsychotic medication uptake is imperative. These may include formulary restrictions, affordability issues, limited access to psychiatric providers, and concerns about medication side effects, which have been well-documented as factors deterring adherence. Addressing these challenges through policy reform, enhanced education, and integrated care models within university health services could narrow treatment disparities and improve prognoses.

As psychosis onset typically occurs around age 20, the college years represent a critical juncture for intervention. Incorporating routine screening for psychotic symptoms, expanding mental health resources, promoting psychoeducation, and reducing stigma on campuses can establish protective mechanisms to encourage earlier treatment uptake. This study’s findings invite multidisciplinary collaboration among clinicians, educators, policymakers, and student advocates to design holistic programs that better meet the needs of this vulnerable population.

In conclusion, this investigation into mental health help-seeking among college students with psychosis unveils a pressing public health issue — despite recognition of need and willingness to engage in therapy, medication use remains insufficient. This treatment gap threatens to compromise recovery potential and underscores the urgency of dismantling barriers to comprehensive care. Early engagement, supportive social networks, and destigmatizing initiatives will be key components in improving overall outcomes for young adults with psychosis, ultimately fostering healthier campus communities and reducing the societal burden of untreated mental illness.

Subject of Research: People

Article Title: Mental health help-seeking by US college students with a diagnosis of psychosis

News Publication Date: May 20, 2026

Web References:

• Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Journal Article
• Healthy Minds Study
• Mental Health Awareness Month – NAMI

References:

• Godoy-Henderson et al., Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2026.
• US epidemiological data on psychosis prevalence and treatment delays.

Keywords: Psychosis, psychotic disorders, mental health, college students, health care policy, public health, psychiatric medication, therapy, mental health stigma, early intervention

Research shows that the mental health landscape for older adults differs substantially from that of younger populations. As people age, they may face unique stressors, such as the loss of loved ones, retirement, and chronic illnesses. These factors can exacerbate feelings of loneliness and despair, making it imperative for mental health professionals to adopt age-sensitive approaches. By understanding the complexities associated with the ageing experience, practitioners can better tailor their interventions to meet the specific needs of older clients.

One of the key findings in contemporary psycho-gerontological research is the interplay between health-related issues and psychological challenges faced by older adults. Psychological distress can manifest in various ways, including anxiety and depressive disorders, which are often exacerbated by physical health problems. These complications demand a multifaceted treatment approach that considers both mental and physical health, fostering a more holistic view of patient care.

Equally important is the burgeoning evidence supporting the effectiveness of various psychotherapies for older adults. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) has been extensively studied and demonstrated to be beneficial for treating depression and anxiety among older populations. Other therapeutic modalities, such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and problem-solving therapy, also show promise. This diversity of options empowers practitioners to select the most suitable approaches based on individual patient needs, thereby increasing the likelihood of successful outcomes.

Innovative interventions highlight the potential for psychological therapies to enhance the quality of life for older adults. Programs that integrate technology, such as teletherapy or online support groups, have emerged as invaluable resources, particularly for isolated individuals. By leveraging technology, mental health professionals can circumvent geographical and mobility limitations, ensuring that older adults have access to necessary care. The rise of digital mental health tools not only improves availability but also promotes engagement in therapeutic practices.

In addition to innovation in therapy delivery, there is also an increasing emphasis on caregiver support. Many older adults care for spouses or family members dealing with cognitive impairments like dementia. This caregiving burden can lead to emotional distress, highlighting the necessity of including caregivers in mental health interventions. Offering resources, support, and inclusive therapy options for caregivers enhances the overall well-being of both the caregiver and the recipient of care.

A notable trend emerging from psycho-gerontological research is the potential for older adults to experience significant benefits from proactive engagement in psychotherapy. There is a growing body of evidence that suggests that older individuals possess a wealth of life experience and resilience. This often translates into a unique capacity for personal growth and adaptability. By focusing on these strengths rather than their limitations, therapists can foster an environment in which older adults feel empowered to pursue change and healing.

To build upon these findings, mental health professionals are encouraged to continue to refine their approaches. Training and education regarding age-related biases and the specific needs of older adults are essential for all practitioners. Moreover, increased awareness about the mental health needs of the ageing population can contribute to more appropriate referral practices and resource allocation within healthcare systems.

The effect of societal perceptions of ageing cannot be overstated. Negative stereotypes can lead to self-fulfilling prophecies, whereby older adults internalize adverse beliefs about their capabilities and mental health. Addressing and dispelling these myths is critical in fostering a more supportive environment for older individuals seeking psychological help. Community initiatives aimed at celebrating ageing and promoting positive narratives can significantly enhance public understanding and acceptance.

The recommendations for improving psychotherapy outcomes for older adults encompass a combination of tailored interventions, caregiver support, and public awareness campaigns. By comprehensively addressing the multifaceted nature of mental health in old age, stakeholders can create a robust framework that encourages older adults to seek and benefit from psychological therapies.

The research underscores a vital point: ageing does not equate to an inevitable decline in mental health. It can be a time of growth, resilience, and newfound purpose. By shifting the narrative around ageing and mental health, the societal stigma attached to seeking psychological help can wane, leading to improved access and outcomes for older adults struggling with mental health challenges.

Mental health professionals must advocate for more inclusive research and policies that reflect the diversity of the ageing population. As they work towards dismantling ageist stereotypes and promoting empowerment, they can help older individuals pave their paths to mental wellness and overall life satisfaction. Collectively, these efforts will ensure that the psychological health of older adults is prioritized, respected, and understood, paving the way for a brighter future in mental health care.

The implications of this research extend not only to clinical practice but also to the broader societal framework. By integrating the findings of psycho-gerontological research into public health strategies, we can create communities that support mental wellness across all ages. The road ahead is one of partnership, innovation, and commitment to ensuring that older adults are treated with the dignity and respect they deserve, thus fostering a culture of empathy and understanding as they navigate the complexities of ageing.

In conclusion, addressing the mental health challenges of older adults requires a concerted effort from health professionals, caregivers, and society as a whole. By championing the principles of empathy, education, and innovation, we can transform the narrative surrounding ageing and mental health. This, in turn, will enable older adults to embrace their golden years with the dignity, purpose, and psychological support they rightfully deserve.

Subject of Research: Mental health challenges and psychological interventions in older adults.

Article Title: Mental health and treatment challenges in older adults.

Article References:

Laidlaw, K., Charlesworth, G. & Bhar, S. Mental health and treatment challenges in older adults. Nat Rev Psychol (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-025-00500-7

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI:

Keywords: Ageing, Mental Health, Psychotherapy, Older Adults, Depression, Anxiety, Psycho-Gerontology, Caring for Caregivers, Treatment Innovations, Stereotypes, Empowerment, Holistic Health, Public Awareness, Ageism.

A critical barrier identified in the study is the lack of recognition among individuals regarding the necessity for mental health treatment. This awareness is paramount for prompting individuals to seek help; however, the research highlights a sizable gap even among those who do reach out to the healthcare system. Many patients initiating contact with healthcare providers often find themselves not receiving adequate treatment, underscoring an urgent need for systemic improvement.

Lead author Dr. Daniel Vigo, an associate professor in the Department of Psychiatry and the School of Population and Public Health at UBC, emphasized the significance of their findings, stating, “This survey data has allowed us to create the only effective treatment indicator that exists for mental health and substance use.” The outcomes of this study provide essential data-driven insights, which can help guide policy makers in making informed decisions regarding mental health funding and resource allocation. In an area where strategic decisions have often lacked empirical underpinning, this research represents a monumental step forward.

The study’s backdrop is rooted in the World Health Organization-World Mental Health Surveys Initiative, which intends to gather thorough data about the prevalence, severity, and treatment of mental disorders on a global scale. The current analysis pays special attention to survey participants diagnosed with disorders as classified by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV, a standard diagnostic tool utilized widely among mental health professionals from 1994 to 2013. By focusing on these well-defined criteria, the research endeavors to present a clear understanding of patient experiences as they navigate the often complex mental health care landscape.

To gain nuanced insights into treatment accessibility, the research team, which includes Dr. Ronald Kessler from Harvard, meticulously examined a total of four crucial steps in the treatment process. The journey toward effective treatment encompasses: recognizing the need for treatment, making contact with the healthcare system, receiving an adequate minimum level of treatment, and ultimately, receiving effective treatment. The analysis brought forth striking statistics that delineate the challenges at every stage, revealing significant attrition rates that contribute to the disconcerting overall figure of only 6.9 percent securing effective treatment.

The data indicated a conspicuous drop-off at every step of the treatment journey. Alarmingly, only 46.5 percent of individuals who met the criteria for a mental health disorder acknowledged their need for treatment. Of those who did recognize their need, a mere 34.1 percent took the crucial step of reaching out to the medical system for assistance. Among those who sought help, a commendable 82.9 percent received a minimum level of adequate treatment; however, a troubling 47 percent of individuals fallen short of receiving effective treatment despite undergoing minimally adequate care.

This research elucidates the significant hurdles that persist in the mental health treatment framework, particularly after patients have contacted the healthcare system yet before they access effective treatment. Dr. Vigo pointed out the vital role that general practitioners and family doctors play, as they often serve as the initial point of contact with the healthcare system. The necessity for these primary care providers to possess the requisite training and expertise in diagnosing and managing mild to moderate mental health conditions is paramount. Training is equally important for identifying cases that necessitate referrals to specialized mental health services, an essential aspect of refining the existing healthcare system.

As Dr. Vigo poignantly remarked, “Improving the ability of these general practitioners and family doctors to diagnose and treat the mild to moderate forms, and to know when to refer more severely affected folks to specialists, becomes the cornerstone of the system.” This commentary reflects not only the immediate need for educational enhancements within primary care settings but also positions improved diagnosis and treatment protocols as foundational to establishing an effective mental healthcare framework.

The findings of this pivotal research, which is published in JAMA Psychiatry, open the dialogue for policymakers to reevaluate and prioritize specific investment strategies that target the gaps identified in mental health care services. By highlighting discrepancies in service availability and treatment outcomes across various disorders such as bipolar disorder and addiction, the study empowers stakeholders to take actionable steps that could potentially yield significant improvements in care delivery.

In a broader context, this research can prompt a global reassessment of mental health policies, emphasizing a data-driven approach aimed at improving access to treatment. As awareness of mental health issues continues to grow, it becomes increasingly important for decision-makers and healthcare professionals to collaborate effectively in addressing the complex landscape of mental health care inadequacies.

At its core, the researchers advocate for a systemic transformation that incorporates both clinical insight and empirical data to construct a more responsive mental health treatment framework. Such transformations are not merely beneficial—they are essential for ensuring that vulnerable populations receive the help they desperately need and deserve. As society continues to grapple with escalating mental health issues, this study serves as a critical reminder of the stark realities faced by those in need of effective treatment and the urgent need for comprehensive reforms in mental healthcare provision.

This research underscores a sobering reality: that despite the growing recognition of mental health as a critical public health issue, the infrastructure supporting treatment accessibility and effectiveness requires profound enhancement. By shedding light on the mechanisms of treatment attrition and the systemic barriers that exist, researchers and policymakers can work in concert to forge pathways that lead to better health outcomes for individuals grappling with mental health and substance-use disorders.

Subject of Research: People
Article Title: Effective Treatment for Mental and Substance Use Disorders in 21 Countries
News Publication Date: 5-Feb-2025
Web References: JAMA Psychiatry
References: Frontiers in Mental Health
Image Credits: N/A

Keywords: mental health, effective treatment, substance use, healthcare policy, anxiety disorders, medical treatments, psychological science.

In an insightful study soon to be published in JASA Express Letters by the Acoustical Society of America, a multidisciplinary team from esteemed institutions, including the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, has pioneered machine learning methods capable of screening for comorbid AD and MDD through acoustic voice signals. This research taps into the burgeoning fields of acoustics and artificial intelligence, showcasing how technological advancements can bridge the gap in mental health diagnosis.

The genesis of this research lies in the clinical inefficiencies surrounding the diagnosis of AD and MDD. The authors, led by Mary Pietrowicz, noted a prominent overlap in symptoms and challenges associated with identifying individuals suffering from both conditions simultaneously. The research team noted that traditional screening methods often overlooked the nuanced acoustic signatures present in individuals with comorbid disorders. Interestingly, acoustic markers for AD and MDD are often oppositional, creating difficulties in accurate identification. This uniqueness sets the groundwork for utilizing advanced machine learning tools to enhance diagnostic accuracy.

Participants in this study were female individuals, both with and without the comorbid conditions of AD and MDD. Their vocal responses were meticulously recorded using a secure telehealth platform during a timed semantic verbal fluency test aimed at naming as many animals as possible within one minute. This method not only facilitated a controlled environment for the assessment but also ensured that the privacy and integrity of the participants’ data were maintained.

The heart of the study hinges on the extraction of specific acoustic and phonemic features contained within the sound recordings. Researchers employed machine learning techniques to analyze these vocal patterns, streamlining the process of differentiating between individuals with and without comorbid AD and MDD. The findings were promising, confirming that a mere minute of verbal fluency can serve as a reliable screening tool for depression and anxiety, paving the way for earlier interventions and improved patient outcomes.

Delving deeper into the results, Pietrowicz emphasized that subjects within the AD/MDD group demonstrated a tendency to utilize simpler vocabulary, indicating a potential cognitive limitation often linked to these disorders. Furthermore, there was a noticeable reduction in phonemic variability and a decreased range of phonemic similarity within their speech patterns. These findings not only contribute to the understanding of the acoustic profiles associated with comorbid AD and MDD but also highlight the utility of voice analysis as a potential screening tool in clinical practice.

The necessity of further investigations into the biological mechanisms underlying these results has not gone unnoticed. Pietrowicz aspires to refine the machine learning model, in hopes of achieving greater accuracy in diagnostic applications. The researcher acknowledges the need for expansive data collection from diverse populations to enhance the model’s validity. This step is vital for addressing the diverse manifestations of AD and MDD, as well as for accommodating variations across demographic factors such as age and ethnicity.

Through continuous efforts to improve the scale, diversity, and modalities of the gathered data, Pietrowicz and her team aim to harness innovative analytical techniques. This commitment underscores the importance of collaboration between fields like psychology, machine learning, and acoustics to develop effective tools that can drastically alter the landscape of mental health diagnostics. Further exploration of this intersection could lead to groundbreaking methodologies that empower healthcare providers to combat mental health disorders effectively.

It is important to consider the implications of this research within the broader context of mental health awareness and treatment accessibility. The integration of acoustic voice screening techniques could represent a paradigm shift in how clinicians assess mental health conditions. By normalizing these assessments in a comfortable environment, such as through telehealth services, barriers to diagnosis can be significantly lowered, ultimately benefiting those individuals who have been previously marginalized in traditional settings.

As this research is poised for publication, it not only contributes to the scientific community but also ignites a conversation regarding the relationship between voice characteristics and mental health. The findings serve as a call to action for further interdisciplinary studies exploring these connections. An effective screening tool can inform treatment options, leading to a greater understanding of the complexities around mental health issues and fostering a culture of empathy and support for those in need.

Ultimately, the research elucidates the significance of treatment accessibility and timely diagnosis for individuals struggling with anxiety and depression. As the mental health landscape continuously evolves, the role of technological innovations, such as machine learning and acoustic analysis, becomes increasingly critical in paving the way for a future where mental health care is both accessible and personalized.

The implementation of these tools could lead to substantial advancements in the approach to mental wellness, redefining how society perceives and reacts to mental health challenges. Such developments are not merely academic exercises; they have the potential to save lives by ensuring that individuals receive the acknowledgment and care they desperately need.

As the dialogue surrounding mental health continues to expand, research like this highlights the importance of innovation in fostering a more informed, compassionate, and responsive mental health care system.

—

Subject of Research: Automated acoustic voice screening for comorbid depression and anxiety disorders
Article Title: Automated acoustic voice screening techniques for comorbid depression and anxiety disorders
News Publication Date: 4-Feb-2025
Web References: https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0034851
References: DOI: 10.1121/10.0034851
Image Credits: Hannah Daniel/AIP

Keywords: Anxiety disorders, Machine learning, Voice, Mental health