<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AUDPC &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/audpc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 15:34:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Super Susceptible Wheat Landraces Could Unlock the Secrets of Durable Rust Resistance</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/super-susceptible-wheat-landraces-could-unlock-the-secrets-of-durable-rust-resistance/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 15:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adult plant resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adult-plant resistance in wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AUDPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bread wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disease screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[durable rust resistance in wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungal pathogen resistance breeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G-DIRT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gene discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic resources for wheat improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian wheat genetic research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landrace gene mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landrace-based wheat breeding programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landraces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaf rust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaf rust fungal diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant breeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puccinia triticina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNP genotyping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super susceptible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traditional bread wheat genetic diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat breeding for disease resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat crop disease management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat landrace susceptibility]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=206419</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have identified fourteen uniquely super-susceptible bread wheat landraces that could serve as essential contrasting parents for mapping durable adult-plant resistance to leaf rust.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the unglamorous world of plant pathology, susceptibility rarely makes headlines. Yet a new study from Indian agricultural researchers may change that, because it turns extreme vulnerability into a powerful scientific tool. Scientists screening thousands of traditional bread wheat landraces have identified a small group of lines that are astonishingly susceptible to leaf rust, one of the most damaging fungal diseases of wheat worldwide. Rather than being a liability, these &#8216;super susceptible&#8217; landraces could become indispensable parents for mapping the genes that confer durable, adult-plant resistance, and could help breeders develop wheat varieties that stay healthy season after season.</p>
<p>The research, published in the Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, emerged from a massive gene discovery effort involving a panel of 4,575 bread wheat landraces. Bread wheat is the second most important cereal crop on Earth, supplying roughly 20 percent of the calories and protein in the human diet. But its productivity is under constant threat from leaf rust, caused by the fungus Puccinia triticina, which can slash global yields by 20 to 25 percent when epidemics strike. The classic defense strategy, breeding for genetic resistance, is the most effective and economical way to limit these losses, but it is locked in a perpetual arms race: the pathogen mutates rapidly, and resistance genes that work today can be rendered useless within a few seasons.</p>
<p>To keep ahead of the fungus, breeders need to discover and map new resistance genes, both seedling-stage genes that protect the plant throughout its life and adult-plant resistance genes that activate as the crop matures. Mapping such genes requires crossing parents with sharply contrasting disease responses, typically a resistant line and a reliably, uniformly susceptible one. Herein lies a long-standing technical bottleneck. While mapping seedling resistance through bi-parental populations is well standardized, mapping adult-plant resistance is far harder, partly because the commonly used susceptible parents carry additional minor genes that muddy the genetic signal. A truly &#8216;clean&#8217; susceptible parent, one stripped of confounding background resistance, has been the missing ingredient.</p>
<p>That ingredient is what the team led by researchers at ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute in New Delhi set out to find. From the enormous landrace panel, they selected 20 lines previously flagged as leaf rust susceptible. These were evaluated alongside two checks: HI1500, a resistant control, and Agra Local, a classic susceptible control that has served wheat pathologists for decades. The landraces were tested at the seedling stage and in the field at the adult plant stage across two consecutive growing seasons, under both timely and late sowing conditions, providing a rigorous, multi-environment assessment of their disease behavior.</p>
<p>The seedling results were striking. Fourteen of the 20 landraces displayed an extremely susceptible infection type, ranging from IT-3 to 33+, against every one of sixteen different pathotypes of Puccinia triticina used in the trial. In practical terms, these lines had no detectable seedling resistance whatsoever to any of the fungal races thrown at them. This uniform, unqualified susceptibility across a broad spectrum of pathotypes is precisely the phenotype breeders need in a contrasting parent: any resistance that appears in a mapping population derived from such a cross can be traced back to the resistant parent without ambiguity.</p>
<p>Field evaluations reinforced the laboratory findings. Under both timely and late sown conditions over two years, the susceptible landraces recorded final disease severity scores of 60 to 100 percent, area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) values between 560 and 1330, and adult crop infection (ACI) values of 75 to 100. These are exceptionally high figures, indicating not just susceptibility but sustained, aggressive disease development throughout the season. The AUDPC metric, which integrates disease severity over time, is a standard measure of slow-rusting behavior; values in this range confirm the absence of any partial resistance that might otherwise complicate genetic analysis.</p>
<p>A critical concern when working with gene bank material is duplication: if two accessions are genetically identical, they are not independent data points and can waste breeding resources. To rule this out, the researchers compared SNP genotyping data for the 20 landraces using the G-DIRT software, a web tool designed to identify duplicate germplasm through identity-by-state analysis of single nucleotide polymorphism markers. The analysis confirmed that each accession possessed a unique genetic identity, meaning the researchers had twenty genuinely distinct super-susceptible lines rather than multiple copies of the same genotype. This genomic curation step reflects a broader trend in modern gene bank management, where high-throughput genotyping is used to weed out redundancy and maximize the utility of conserved collections.</p>
<p>The implications of the work extend well beyond the laboratory. The super-susceptible lines identified here can serve two immediate roles. First, they are ideal contrasting parents for mapping the component traits of adult-plant resistance genes. Adult-plant resistance, often conferred by multiple minor genes that individually have small effects, underpins the most durable forms of rust resistance in wheat, including famous pleiotropic genes such as Lr34 and Lr46. Precise mapping of these minor genes depends on phenotypic contrast, and a susceptible parent free of background resistance dramatically sharpens the resolution of quantitative trait loci analysis. Second, the lines can be deployed as rust spreader rows in disease screening nurseries, where highly susceptible plants are interplanted with test material to amplify and uniformly distribute pathogen inoculum, ensuring that every breeding line faces an equal and severe disease challenge.</p>
<p>The study also carries a broader lesson about the value of landraces, the farmer-maintained traditional varieties that preceded modern breeding. Landraces are reservoirs of genetic diversity, shaped by centuries of natural and farmer selection across diverse environments. While this study mined them for extreme susceptibility, the same diversity holds untapped resistance genes awaiting discovery. Gene banks worldwide hold hundreds of thousands of wheat accessions, and systematic, large-scale phenotyping and genotyping efforts of the kind undertaken here are transforming these collections from static archives into dynamic engines of trait discovery. As climate change alters pathogen dynamics and virulence patterns shift, the ability to rapidly mine genetic diversity for novel resistance becomes a matter of global food security.</p>
<p>For wheat breeders and pathologists, the message is clear: sometimes the most valuable germplasm is not the most resistant but the most vulnerable. By rigorously characterizing fourteen uniquely super-susceptible landraces across seedling assays, multi-season field trials, and SNP-based identity checks, the Indian team has delivered a toolkit for cleaner genetic mapping, more accurate resistance screening, and ultimately the breeding of wheat varieties whose protection endures. In the ongoing battle between wheat and rust, knowing precisely what susceptibility looks like may prove as important as knowing what resistance is.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Identification of super susceptible bread wheat landraces against the leaf rust pathogen Puccinia triticina</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Identification and Characterisation of Super Susceptible Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Landraces against Leaf Rust Pathogen (Puccinia triticina Eriks.)</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Identification and Characterisation of Super Susceptible Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Landraces against Leaf Rust Pathogen (Puccinia triticina Eriks.). (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44489-026-00033-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44489-026-00033-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44489-026-00033-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44489-026-00033-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> bread wheat, landraces, leaf rust, Puccinia triticina, super susceptible, adult plant resistance, AUDPC, SNP genotyping, G-DIRT, gene discovery, plant breeding, disease screening</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">206419</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists Pinpoint Wheat Genes That Fight Devastating Spot Blotch Disease</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/scientists-pinpoint-wheat-genes-that-fight-devastating-spot-blotch-disease/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliet Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 00:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AUDPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bipolaris sorokiniana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bipolaris sorokiniana resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bread wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[candidate genes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chromosome 3BS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[durable genetic resistance in crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungal pathogens in wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gene expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic loci for wheat disease resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genome-wide association studies in wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genome-wide association study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of spot blotch on wheat yield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marker-assisted selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marker-trait association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular markers for wheat disease resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant disease resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spot blotch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stay-green trait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat breeding for disease resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat disease management strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat disease resistance genes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat gene expression analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wheat genetic resistance to spot blotch disease]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=200048</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A large genome-wide association study of elite bread wheat has identified a stable chromosome 3BS locus and differentially expressed candidate genes conferring resistance to spot blotch disease.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A sweeping genetic investigation of more than 1,200 elite bread wheat lines has delivered one of the clearest pictures yet of how wheat can defend itself against spot blotch, a destructive fungal disease that thrives in the warm, humid wheat belts of South Asia and beyond. The study, published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics, combined large-scale field phenotyping, genome-wide association studies conducted with three independent statistical models, and time-course gene expression analysis to converge on a stable resistance locus on the short arm of chromosome 3B, along with a set of candidate genes whose behavior differs sharply between resistant and susceptible plants after infection.</p>
<p>Spot blotch, caused by the necrotrophic fungus Bipolaris sorokiniana, is among the most serious foliar diseases of wheat in warmer growing regions. It produces dark, irregular lesions on leaves, accelerates senescence, and steadily erodes photosynthetic capacity, with yield losses that can be severe in the eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains and other non-traditional wheat areas. Because the pathogen flourishes precisely where heat stress already pushes wheat plants to their physiological limits, and because fungicides are often impractical for smallholder farmers, breeders have long sought durable genetic resistance. The new research offers a molecular roadmap for that effort.</p>
<p>The team evaluated 1,500 elite wheat lines for spot blotch severity across two environments, scoring disease progression using the area under the disease progress curve, or AUDPC, a standard epidemiological measure that integrates disease severity over time. They also recorded days to heading and stay-green traits, the latter reflecting a plant&#8217;s ability to retain green, photosynthetically active foliage longer than normal. Intriguingly, AUDPC was negatively correlated with both heading date and stay-green characteristics, meaning lines that flowered later and stayed greener tended to accumulate less disease. This correlation, while biologically interesting, also posed a statistical problem: apparent disease resistance could simply be a byproduct of delayed maturity rather than genuine defense.</p>
<p>To disentangle these effects, the researchers ran genome-wide association studies using three different models: the mixed linear model, FarmCPU, and BLINK. Each model handles population structure and relatedness among the wheat lines differently, so markers detected consistently across models carry greater confidence. The GWAS identified seven stable marker-trait associations for AUDPC and eleven for stay-green traits, with three markers shared between the two trait families: 3B_6127880, 5B_546704556, and 5B_546132836. The overlap suggests that some genomic regions influence both disease response and the stay-green phenotype, a relationship that has been suspected since earlier work linked leaf tip necrosis and stay-green expression to spot blotch resistance.</p>
<p>The statistical confounding of heading date demanded a more rigorous test. The team therefore repeated the association analysis on a subset of genotypes with similar heading dates, effectively holding maturity constant. In this reduced panel, the marker 3B_6127880 on chromosome arm 3BS remained a consistent locus for AUDPC, confirming that it is associated with true disease resistance rather than with flowering time. Its physical position places it near previously reported spot blotch quantitative trait loci on 3BS, including regions implicated in earlier mapping populations derived from the resistant line Chirya 3, reinforcing the idea that this chromosome arm harbors a genuine and repeatable resistance factor.</p>
<p>Beyond the headline marker, the study catalogued a series of putative marker-trait associations and haplotypes linked to both AUDPC and stay-green traits. Haplotype analysis, which examines combinations of alleles inherited together across a chromosomal segment, revealed favorable allele combinations that breeders could track with molecular markers. Because spot blotch resistance in wheat is known to be quantitatively inherited, controlled by many genes of modest effect rather than a single major gene, assembling favorable haplotypes across multiple loci through marker-assisted selection is a realistic breeding strategy, and the newly validated SNPs provide fresh raw material for it.</p>
<p>To move from statistical association to biological mechanism, the researchers examined candidate genes lying within the genomic intervals of the most important markers. A time-course expression analysis compared the resistant genotype Chirya 3 with the susceptible variety Sonalika following spot blotch infection. The candidate genes showed clear differential expression between the two genotypes over the course of disease development, indicating that the associated loci are not merely correlated with resistance but plausibly participate in the defense response itself. Among the gene classes implicated were receptor-like kinases and other signaling components of the kind increasingly recognized as central regulators of plant immunity, as well as genes involved in cell wall modification such as expansins, which may influence how the fungus attempts to colonize leaf tissue.</p>
<p>The expression data carry particular weight because necrotrophic pathogens like Bipolaris sorokiniana exploit host cell death, making the timing and calibration of defense signaling critical. Previous transcriptional studies of spot blotch infection have documented the activation of salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and ethylene pathways, along with reactive oxygen species dynamics, and the new candidate genes slot into this broader signaling architecture. By showing that the same genes flagged by GWAS respond dynamically to infection in a resistant background but behave differently in a susceptible one, the study links field-level disease scores to molecular events inside the leaf, closing a loop that pure association mapping cannot close on its own.</p>
<p>The practical implications extend quickly to the breeding pipeline. The identified SNPs, favorable alleles, haplotypes, and candidate genes can be deployed in marker-assisted selection to stack spot blotch resistance into high-yielding wheat varieties adapted to the warm, humid conditions of South Asia, where the disease and terminal heat stress often strike together. The authors have also made the phenotypic and genotypic data for all genotypes publicly available through a Zenodo repository, lowering the barrier for other groups to validate the markers in their own germplasm. As genomic selection and gene editing become routine tools in wheat improvement, a well-anchored, expression-supported resistance locus such as 3B_6127880 offers exactly the kind of target that turns a genome-wide scan into durable protection for one of the world&#8217;s most important staple crops.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Genetic determinants of spot blotch resistance in bread wheat identified through genome-wide association studies and gene expression analyses</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Genome wide association studies and expression analyses identify candidate genes for spot blotch resistance in bread wheat</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Singh, G. M., Kumar, U., Acharya, B. S., Bhati, P., Vishwakarma, M., Saini, D. K., Kumar, S., Mishra, V. K., Joshi, A. K., &amp; Sharma, S. (2026). Genome wide association studies and expression analyses identify candidate genes for spot blotch resistance in bread wheat. <em>Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 139</em>(9), Article 253. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-026-05362-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-026-05362-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-026-05362-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00122-026-05362-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> spot blotch, bread wheat, Bipolaris sorokiniana, genome-wide association study, marker-trait association, chromosome 3BS, candidate genes, stay-green trait, AUDPC, marker-assisted selection, gene expression, plant disease resistance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">200048</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
