<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>atmospheric deposition of PFAS &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/atmospheric-deposition-of-pfas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 15:33:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Study Finds Plants Uncover Hidden PFAS Pollution Overlooked by Soil Tests</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/study-finds-plants-uncover-hidden-pfas-pollution-overlooked-by-soil-tests/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell Cooper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 15:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atmospheric deposition of PFAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bio-indicators for PFAS detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental monitoring of PFAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of military activities on environmental pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term environmental effects of PFAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novel methods for PFAS detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[persistent organic pollutants in soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFAS bioaccumulation in crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFAS contamination in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFAS contamination in potato plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFAS pollution in conflict zones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil versus plant PFAS analysis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/study-finds-plants-uncover-hidden-pfas-pollution-overlooked-by-soil-tests/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a groundbreaking study conducted in the agricultural fields proximate to a conflict-ridden zone in southern Israel, researchers have unveiled compelling evidence that plants may serve as an effective bio-indicator for recent Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination resulting from atmospheric deposition. This novel insight challenges the traditional paradigms that have long relied predominantly on [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a groundbreaking study conducted in the agricultural fields proximate to a conflict-ridden zone in southern Israel, researchers have unveiled compelling evidence that plants may serve as an effective bio-indicator for recent Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination resulting from atmospheric deposition. This novel insight challenges the traditional paradigms that have long relied predominantly on soil analysis to trace environmental contamination, revealing a previously underappreciated vector of pollutant dispersal.</p>
<p>PFAS are a group of synthetic chemicals widely used for their resistance to heat, water, and oil. They are infamous for their persistence in the environment, earning the moniker “forever chemicals.” Deployed extensively in firefighting foams, non-stick cookware, and various industrial applications, PFAS compounds have recently become the focus of global environmental concern due to their toxicological impact and bioaccumulative properties. The potential linkage of these substances to military activities underscores a pressing need for refined monitoring methodologies.</p>
<p>The study focused specifically on the assessment of PFAS concentrations in both environmental matrices: the soil and the vegetation—particularly the leaves of potato plants cultivated within the conflict-zone’s agricultural buffer areas. Remarkably, the findings illustrate that the potato leaves exhibited substantially higher PFAS concentrations compared to the adjacent soil samples. This discrepancy strongly suggests that the contamination pathway transcends mere root uptake, implicating direct aerial deposition as a significant source of pollution.</p>
<p>This atmospheric contamination hypothesis introduces a paradigm shift. Traditionally, environmental surveillance has prioritized soil sampling to infer contamination extent and sources. However, the disparity observed here indicates that airborne particles, potentially laden with PFAS due to military activities—such as the application of aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF) and possibly explosive residues—could deposit chemicals directly onto plant surfaces. This mode of transfer may propagate pollutants over landscapes more dynamically than soil-bound diffusion alone.</p>
<p>Delving deeper, the study did not establish a robust correlation between soil PFAS concentrations and proximity to the conflict epicenter. This observation further complicates the narrative, suggesting that the deposition of PFAS is influenced by additional variables, including atmospheric conditions, particulate matter transport, and possibly episodic contamination events associated with military engagements. These factors collectively contribute to a complex environmental contamination landscape that resists simplistic spatial interpretations.</p>
<p>The employment of potato plants as bio-monitors introduces a promising avenue not only for detection but also for mapping the temporal dynamics of PFAS contamination. Vegetative tissues, by virtue of their surface area and physiological characteristics, may selectively accumulate toxicants from the atmosphere, thus serving as sentinels of recent or ongoing pollution events. This capability potentially enables earlier detection of contamination plumes that traditional soil monitoring might overlook.</p>
<p>Chemical analysis conducted on the potato leaves revealed a diverse spectrum of PFAS compounds, emphasizing the insidious nature of environmental pollution in conflict zones. This spectrum indicates multiple contamination sources and transport pathways, echoing the multifaceted impact of military conflict on surrounding ecosystems. Importantly, these findings highlight the necessity for integrated environmental monitoring frameworks that encompass various biological and abiotic reservoirs.</p>
<p>The implications of these findings extend beyond mere detection. They call for a reevaluation of environmental risk assessments in regions subject to military activity where AFFF and explosives are deployed. The inhalation or dermal exposure of local populations to airborne PFAS contaminated particles, alongside the contamination of food crops, presents a tangible threat to human health and ecological stability. This necessitates urgent regulatory scrutiny and the development of mitigation strategies.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the study’s novel biomonitoring approach could be extrapolated to diverse geographical areas globally impacted by PFAS pollution. It advocates for the inclusion of vegetation sampling in routine environmental surveillance protocols, particularly in areas where soil testing alone may underestimate or fail to detect recent or transient contamination events. This adaptability resonates with the increasing demand for sensitive, cost-effective, and versatile environmental diagnostics.</p>
<p>From a technical perspective, the employment of advanced analytical techniques, likely including liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry, facilitated the detection and quantification of trace-level PFAS in plant tissues. Such precision is essential in environmental toxicology, given the low concentration thresholds at which PFAS exert adverse biological effects. This methodological rigor underpins the reliability of the study’s conclusions.</p>
<p>The study serves as a poignant reminder of the often hidden and diffuse environmental consequences of armed conflict, particularly in ecologically sensitive agricultural zones. It reveals how warfare, beyond its immediate human toll, can instigate environmental contamination pathways capable of affecting food security, ecosystem functions, and public health over protracted periods. Recognizing and addressing these legacies is imperative in post-conflict environmental restoration efforts.</p>
<p>In summary, this research advances our understanding of PFAS environmental dynamics by exposing the critical role of atmospheric deposition in contaminating agricultural vegetation near conflict zones. It underscores the insufficiency of sole reliance on soil contamination assessments and highlights the value of emergent biomonitoring strategies. This knowledge enriches the scientific dialogue on environmental pollution and offers actionable insights for policymakers, environmental scientists, and public health advocates seeking to safeguard vulnerable landscapes and communities.</p>
<hr />
<p><strong>Subject of Research</strong>: Environmental contamination by PFAS near conflict zones; biomonitoring using vegetation.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title</strong>: Plants as Sentinels: Unveiling Atmospheric PFAS Contamination in Conflict-Affected Agricultural Fields.</p>
<p><strong>News Publication Date</strong>: Information not provided.</p>
<p><strong>Web References</strong>: Information not provided.</p>
<p><strong>References</strong>: Information not provided.</p>
<p><strong>Image Credits</strong>: Provided by EurekAlert! (<a href="https://mediasvc.eurekalert.org/Api/v1/Multimedia/6ea6bddc-c461-4d1c-a6b1-f03535ac1292/Rendition/thumbnail/Content/Public">https://mediasvc.eurekalert.org/Api/v1/Multimedia/6ea6bddc-c461-4d1c-a6b1-f03535ac1292/Rendition/thumbnail/Content/Public</a>)</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: PFAS, environmental contamination, atmospheric deposition, biomonitoring, conflict zones, aqueous film-forming foams, potato leaves, agricultural pollution, toxicology, environmental surveillance, persistent pollutants, military activities</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">165541</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists Detect PFAS Contamination in Great Lakes Rainfall and Snow</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/scientists-detect-pfas-contamination-in-great-lakes-rainfall-and-snow/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell Cooper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 20:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Athmospheric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atmospheric deposition of PFAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atmospheric transport modeling of pollutants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical analysis of precipitation samples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact of PFAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forever chemicals in snow and rain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Lakes water pollution sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Sea Grant PFAS research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in precipitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFAS contamination in Great Lakes rainfall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regional monitoring of PFAS contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USGS funded PFAS study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[variability of PFAS concentrations in weather]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/scientists-detect-pfas-contamination-in-great-lakes-rainfall-and-snow/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Minnesota Sea Grant researchers have embarked on a groundbreaking investigation into the pervasive presence and mechanisms of atmospheric deposition of PFAS—per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances—across the Great Lakes region. These substances, often coined “forever chemicals” due to their persistent nature, have been detected consistently in precipitation samples spanning two years of meticulous monitoring. The research illuminates [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minnesota Sea Grant researchers have embarked on a groundbreaking investigation into the pervasive presence and mechanisms of atmospheric deposition of PFAS—per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances—across the Great Lakes region. These substances, often coined “forever chemicals” due to their persistent nature, have been detected consistently in precipitation samples spanning two years of meticulous monitoring. The research illuminates the complex pathways through which PFAS enter and influence aquatic systems, highlighting significant atmospheric contributions that extend well beyond traditional point sources such as wastewater discharges and local industrial emissions.</p>
<p>The project, funded by the United States Geological Survey and led by Minnesota Sea Grant, combines precipitation sampling at multiple regional sites with sophisticated atmospheric transport modeling and advanced chemical analyses. Researchers gathered weekly rain and snow samples at five strategic locations in Minnesota and Michigan, subjecting them to rigorous chemical profiling. The findings reveal that PFAS compounds are not anomalies but are persistently present, suggesting that atmospheric deposition constitutes a major and widespread vector of contamination in this ecologically critical area.</p>
<p>One of the pivotal revelations from this work is the substantial variability in PFAS composition and concentration detected in precipitation events. This variability is not random but is intricately linked to fluctuating weather patterns and air mass trajectories. By applying advanced atmospheric models that trace the movement of air masses prior to precipitation events, the team has begun pinpointing likely source regions and unraveling the meteorological factors influencing the distribution and deposition of these persistent pollutants.</p>
<p>Standard PFAS testing methods, which typically target a predefined suite of roughly 30 known PFAS compounds, were found to underrepresent the true scope of contamination. Through the use of non-target analysis techniques, the researchers identified nearly 300 unique fluorinated chemical signals within precipitation samples. These encompass not only established PFAS but also their precursors, related fluorinated pesticides, pharmaceuticals, and numerous other compounds rarely included in routine environmental monitoring. This underscores the critical need to broaden analytical frameworks to fully capture the complex contamination landscape.</p>
<p>The persistent detection of PFAS in precipitation underscores the challenge of these substances’ environmental ubiquity. PFAS are utilized extensively in various consumer and industrial products—including nonstick cookware, waterproof fabrics, firefighting foams, and food packaging—and their chemical stability renders them resistant to natural degradation processes. As a result, these chemicals accumulate in diverse environmental compartments, ultimately infiltrating the food web and posing health risks to wildlife and humans alike.</p>
<p>Atmospheric deposition acts as a long-range transport mechanism, allowing PFAS and associated fluorinated chemicals to travel hundreds of miles from original emission sources before being deposited via rain or snow. This finding disrupts traditional paradigms that primarily link PFAS contamination to direct discharges such as from wastewater treatment plants or industrial sites. It becomes evident that regional and even continental-scale atmospheric processes must be considered in management and mitigation strategies.</p>
<p>Seasonal trends revealed distinct patterns in PFAS deposition, with elevated concentrations of certain fluorinated compounds during spring and summer months and diminished levels in winter. These fluctuations are likely tied to meteorological variables, photochemical reactions, and source activity cycles, further complicating the environmental fate and transport dynamics of these chemicals. The temporal variability accentuates the necessity for sustained, year-round monitoring programs to accurately characterize contamination profiles and their drivers.</p>
<p>The integration of atmospheric transport modeling with chemical analysis demands formidable computational and methodological rigor. Researchers are addressing the challenge of linking minuscule concentrations—often at nanogram per liter scales—with extensive spatial domains exceeding 100 square miles. This process involves assimilating voluminous meteorological data, refining dispersion algorithms, and painstakingly correlating chemical signatures with modeled air movement patterns to deduce contamination origins.</p>
<p>The implications of this research extend beyond academic inquiry. By elucidating how PFAS enter and move through atmospheric pathways, these findings inform resource managers and environmental policymakers striving to develop realistic chemical budgets for water bodies and watersheds. Accurately accounting for atmospheric deposition sources is imperative to devising effective remediation efforts, regulatory frameworks, and pollution control measures that protect ecological and human health.</p>
<p>Collectively, this body of work signals an urgent need to revamp long-standing environmental monitoring paradigms. Current PFAS surveillance predominantly focuses on wastewater effluents and soil or sediment contamination; however, the contribution of atmospheric processes has been insufficiently recognized. Incorporating sophisticated precipitation sampling, broad-spectrum chemical analyses, and comprehensive atmospheric modeling will enhance the resolution and fidelity of environmental assessments.</p>
<p>Further, the sheer diversity of fluorinated compounds detected challenges existing regulatory approaches that focus on a small subset of recognized PFAS chemicals. Expanded analytical capabilities are essential to detect emerging contaminants and their precursors that might evade standard monitoring but still contribute significantly to pollution loads. This expanded scope allows a deeper understanding of chemical transformations and persistence within the environment.</p>
<p>This Minnesota Sea Grant project exemplifies the integrative, interdisciplinary research essential for confronting environmental contamination issues of this scale and complexity. By leveraging expertise in aerosol chemistry, atmospheric science, environmental monitoring, and data analysis, the team contributes novel insights into the mechanisms by which persistent pollutants cycle globally and regionally.</p>
<p>Presentations of this research at the forthcoming National Atmospheric Deposition Program Scientific Symposium in Madison, Wisconsin, will disseminate these critical findings broadly within the scientific community. Such knowledge exchange catalyzes improvements in environmental monitoring strategies and fosters collaborations aimed at mitigating the environmental and public health impacts of PFAS contamination in the Great Lakes basin and beyond.</p>
<p>In essence, the identification of atmospheric deposition as a major conduit for PFAS contamination compels a paradigm shift in understanding and managing these “forever chemicals.” Recognizing the complex interplay of chemical persistence, atmospheric transport, and seasonal variability empowers scientists and regulators to better predict contamination patterns, innovate detection methodologies, and craft comprehensive management strategies that address the multifaceted nature of PFAS pollution.</p>
<hr />
<p><strong>Subject of Research</strong>: Atmospheric transport and deposition of PFAS in the Great Lakes region</p>
<p><strong>Article Title</strong>: Atmospheric Highways of Forever Chemicals: Unveiling PFAS Deposition in the Great Lakes Basin</p>
<p><strong>News Publication Date</strong>: Not specified (research to be presented June 2026)</p>
<p><strong>Web References</strong>:</p>
<ul>
<li>Minnesota Sea Grant: <a href="https://seagrant.umn.edu/">https://seagrant.umn.edu/</a></li>
<li>Project page: <a href="https://seagrant.umn.edu/research/trace-atmos-pfas-source-sediment-gl-region">https://seagrant.umn.edu/research/trace-atmos-pfas-source-sediment-gl-region</a></li>
<li>National Atmospheric Deposition Program Scientific Symposium: <a href="https://nadp.slh.wisc.edu/nadp2026/">https://nadp.slh.wisc.edu/nadp2026/</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Image Credits</strong>: Minnesota Sea Grant</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: PFAS, atmospheric deposition, Great Lakes, forever chemicals, environmental monitoring, precipitation, atmospheric transport, fluorinated compounds, pollution modeling, non-target analysis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">158667</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
