<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>artificial intelligence in cybersecurity &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/artificial-intelligence-in-cybersecurity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 14:23:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Vib-ner enables out-of-vocabulary recognition in cybersecurity threat intelligence</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/vib-ner-enables-out-of-vocabulary-recognition-in-cybersecurity-threat-intelligence/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hailey Crawford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 14:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advancements in cyber threat recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI in cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence in cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated cyber defense improvements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersecurity entity extraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersecurity report entity extraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersecurity threat intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast training models for cybersecurity applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improving F1 scores in threat identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information-theoretic techniques in cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine learning for cyber threat detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mutual information-based loss functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[out-of-vocabulary threat detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[out-of-vocabulary threat recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[threat term identification in cyber reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unstructured security report analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VIB-NER model for cyber defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VIB-NER model for threat recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zero-day attack detection]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/vib-ner-enables-out-of-vocabulary-recognition-in-cybersecurity-threat-intelligence/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Cybersecurity researchers have unveiled a new artificial intelligence model that dramatically improves how machines identify never-before-seen threat terms buried in unstructured security reports, a longstanding weak point in automated cyber defense. The model, called VIB-NER, was developed by a team at the National Security Research Institute at Shihezi University in Xinjiang, China, and is described [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cybersecurity researchers have unveiled a new artificial intelligence model that dramatically improves how machines identify never-before-seen threat terms buried in unstructured security reports, a longstanding weak point in automated cyber defense. The model, called VIB-NER, was developed by a team at the National Security Research Institute at Shihezi University in Xinjiang, China, and is described in a study published in the journal Cybersecurity. By combining an information-theoretic technique known as the variational information bottleneck with a mutual information-based loss function, the system achieves F1 scores of around 79 percent, recall of 77 percent, and precision of 80 percent on cybersecurity threat intelligence entity extraction tasks—a 4 to 8 percent improvement over mainstream models such as E-NER. Just as striking, the model cuts the time consumed per training batch by half compared with existing approaches.</p>
<p>The work addresses a problem that has grown increasingly urgent as cyberattacks multiply in both volume and sophistication. Zero-day attacks, emerging exploitation techniques, and traditional security risks now intertwine to produce composite incidents such as data breaches, system intrusions, and financial fraud, threats that imperil individuals, enterprises, and national security alike. Since Gartner formalized the concept of Cyber Threat Intelligence, or CTI, in 2013, security organizations have sought to build knowledge systems encompassing threat scenarios, attack mechanisms, indicator features, impact assessments, and disposal strategies. The promise of CTI is substantial: precise threat response solutions and a significant reduction in the workload of security analysts through automated analysis, strengthening proactive defense at the tactical level.</p>
<p>The obstacle is that threat intelligence overwhelmingly exists as unstructured text—vast in scale, decentralized, fragmented, and full of hidden relationships. Attackers constantly invent new tactics, from enticing users to execute malicious files to exploiting undisclosed vulnerabilities, and the pipeline from intelligence collection to distribution can stretch across months. The result is a flood of out-of-vocabulary, or OOV, terms: hash values, vulnerability identifiers, novel malware names, and hacker group designations that no model has encountered during training. Named entity recognition, the natural language processing task of locating and classifying names within text, is the critical first step in converting this textual deluge into machine-readable threat knowledge graphs. Yet traditional NER models, which lean heavily on explicit entity mention information, suffer severe performance degradation when confronted with these unfamiliar terms.</p>
<p>&#8220;Named entity recognition technology has demonstrated excellent performance in extracting specific threat information, particularly in dealing with datasets that contain many out-of-vocabulary words, with span prediction models showing more pronounced effects,&#8221; the researchers note. However, these advanced span prediction approaches have received inadequate attention in the CTI field specifically. The team&#8217;s central question was how to construct a novel span prediction learning framework that better handles the OOV issues endemic to threat intelligence datasets—where the morphological structure of professional OOV words like hash values and vulnerability numbers differs fundamentally from general-domain vocabulary, and where the long-range dependencies of advanced persistent threat report texts place heavy demands on contextual modeling.</p>
<p>VIB-NER&#8217;s architecture builds on the span-based approach to NER, which treats entity recognition as a text span classification problem rather than tagging each token in a sequence. The model comprises three core modules: a token representation layer, a span representation layer, and a span classification layer. For every possible span in a sentence, the span representation layer combines boundary embeddings—the encoded representations of the span&#8217;s start and end tokens—with a learnable length embedding that captures the span&#8217;s size. The token representation layer then encodes these inputs using non-contextual word embeddings passed through a contextual encoder such as a transformer, with BERT-large serving as the base encoder in the team&#8217;s experiments.</p>
<p>The innovation lies in what happens next. The researchers inserted a Variational Information Bottleneck layer between span enumeration and classification. An encoder function processes each initial span representation to produce a K-dimensional mean vector and a K-by-K covariance matrix, together describing the probability distribution of a latent variable. Through the reparameterization trick—adding scaled standard normal noise—the layer samples a compressed latent representation that retains task-relevant information while discarding redundant detail. In information-theoretic terms, the model seeks an encoding that maximizes mutual information with the target entity labels while constraining redundancy with the raw input, a trade-off balanced by a Lagrange multiplier. The first objective urges the latent representation to retain the key information needed to predict entity labels—for example, distinguishing malware hashes from normal file hashes in CTI texts—while the second forces it to discard task-irrelevant noise.</p>
<p>This bottleneck mechanism is paired with a dynamic loss function based on mutual information maximization that quantifies the statistical dependency between span representations and entity labels. During training, the combined objective guides the model to dynamically balance the threshold between feature compression and information retention. The researchers found that model performance improves markedly when the adjustment coefficients are low, with the best results at a gamma value of 1e-5; as the value increases further, performance declines, indicating that excessive bottleneck constraints can weaken the model&#8217;s generalization to unknown domain entities. The design ensures the model remains focused on the core NER task while simultaneously enhancing representation quality, avoiding both the reduced classification performance caused by over-compression and the noise residue left by insufficient compression.</p>
<p>To validate the approach, the team first benchmarked VIB-NER against state-of-the-art models on general-domain datasets with high OOV rates, including WNUT 2017, TwitterNER, Conll03-Typos, and Conll2003-OOV—the last generated by replacing test-set entities with out-of-vocabulary entities never seen in training. Baselines included SpanNER, DataAug, InferNER, MIN, CoFEE, SA-NER, T-NER, MINER, E-NER, and ACRF-NER, a recent method that applies conditional random fields over aggregated word embeddings. VIB-NER surpassed the performance bottlenecks of conventional approaches across the high-OOV datasets and maintained its lead even on TwitterNER, where the OOV rate is lower. The model also proved robust across different pre-trained encoders, delivering improved recognition performance with BERT, RoBERTa, and ALBERT as underlying language models.</p>
<p>The second validation effort produced a new resource for the field: CTINER, a specialized named entity recognition dataset for network threat intelligence. Recognizing that open-source automatic annotation tools could not fully recognize the field&#8217;s numerous specialized terms, the researchers adopted a manual methodology. Three annotators with CTI expertise performed the initial labeling, achieving a Cohen&#8217;s kappa coefficient of 0.84 on a 10 percent validation sample, indicating high consistency, with subsequent verification by security experts. The annotation effort covered 1,582 threat reports spanning August 2008 to December 2024, executed using the Brat annotation tool. The resulting dataset contains 12,984 sentences, 280,134 tokens, and 49,565 entities across 13 categories, including hacker organizations, advanced persistent threats, sample files, security teams, tools, operating systems, vulnerabilities, and network addresses. To resolve ambiguities, the team leveraged a knowledge base grounded in the MITRE ATT&amp;CK framework and adhering to the STIX standard, which enables clear differentiation between entity categories such as threat actor, campaign, and tool.</p>
<p>Compared with the existing DNRTI dataset, CTINER offers a higher OOV rate, more targeted category coverage under a standardized classification framework, and greater scale in labeled sentences across training, test, and development splits. In cross-dataset experiments, ablation studies isolated the contributions of the three core factors: the span-based architecture, which enhances the ability to process long texts; VIB compression, which alleviates the OOV problem; and mutual information optimization, which strengthens entity boundary recognition in scenarios with imbalanced labels. VIB-NER outperformed both SpanNER and MINER on the CTI data. The researchers acknowledge that indicator values on CTINER were lower than on DNRTI—but, they argue, this precisely confirms the new dataset&#8217;s value, since its high OOV rate and imbalanced label distribution genuinely reproduce the technical difficulties of the CTI domain.</p>
<p>The efficiency gains proved equally significant. The variational information bottleneck imposes information-theoretic constraints that compel the model to discard redundant information unrelated to the target task during encoding, achieving sparse representations that curb overfitting to non-significant features in high-dimensional inputs. This lets the model grasp universal data patterns quickly and reduces the need for frequent adjustments and retraining. Comparative charts of training time show VIB-NER processing more batches per unit of time than SpanNER and E-NER, with overall training duration substantially lower—a consequence of the dynamic mutual information loss precisely guiding the training direction, accelerating convergence, and avoiding ineffective training steps.</p>
<p>The researchers trained their model on an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 GPU, using a learning rate of 5e-5, a dropout rate of 0.2, a bottleneck output dimension of 50, a maximum input length of 128 tokens, and a cap of four on enumerated entity length, with final reports based on the average of the three best-performing checkpoints. Looking ahead, the team says future work will focus on few-shot and unsupervised learning methods to break through the data bottleneck in cybersecurity named entity recognition, where unified datasets remain scarce and manual annotation costs remain high. For defenders facing adversaries who generate novel threat vocabulary faster than any dictionary can track, the message is clear: the tools that read the internet&#8217;s dark corners must learn to compress away noise and hold on to what matters—and VIB-NER offers a mathematically grounded way to do exactly that.</p>
<div class="scienmag-article-metadata"><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> A novel named entity recognition model (VIB-NER) for cybersecurity threat intelligence that addresses out-of-vocabulary entity recognition using a variational information bottleneck and mutual information-based loss</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Vib-ner: a model for out-of-vocabulary recognition in cybersecurity threat intelligence based on variational bottleneck and mutual information</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Wang, Y., Liu, C., Zhang, R., Xu, H., Zhao, J., Sun, Y., &amp; Wang, X. (2026). Vib-ner: a model for out-of-vocabulary recognition in cybersecurity threat intelligence based on variational bottleneck and mutual information. <em>Cybersecurity, 9</em>(1), Article 79. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s42400-025-00480-4" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s42400-025-00480-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s42400-025-00480-4" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s42400-025-00480-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Cyber threat intelligence, Named entity recognition, Variational information bottleneck, Out-of-vocabulary words, Span prediction, Mutual information, CTINER dataset, Machine learning, Cybersecurity</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">192720</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deep Neural Networks Enhance Network Security Vulnerability Repair</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/deep-neural-networks-enhance-network-security-vulnerability-repair/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hailey Crawford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 07:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced cybersecurity practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence in cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated vulnerability repair systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud technology security measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep neural networks for cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enhancing network security with AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luo and Liang cybersecurity framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine learning for vulnerability assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitigating network vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proactive defense against cyber threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapid vulnerability identification methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reducing risk exposure in interconnected systems]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/deep-neural-networks-enhance-network-security-vulnerability-repair/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In recent years, the digital landscape has witnessed an unprecedented increase in both the number and sophistication of cyber threats. As society continues to rely heavily on interconnected systems and cloud technologies, the need for robust cybersecurity measures has never been more crucial. A pioneering study by Luo and Liang presents a comprehensive framework for [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In recent years, the digital landscape has witnessed an unprecedented increase in both the number and sophistication of cyber threats. As society continues to rely heavily on interconnected systems and cloud technologies, the need for robust cybersecurity measures has never been more crucial. A pioneering study by Luo and Liang presents a comprehensive framework for identifying and mitigating network vulnerabilities using deep neural networks. This novel approach signifies a significant advancement in cybersecurity practices, enhancing an organization&#8217;s ability to proactively defend against an array of potential attacks.</p>
<p>The research conducted by Luo and Liang proposes a deep learning-based model that not only detects vulnerabilities but also facilitates their repair through automated processes. Traditional methods of vulnerability assessment often require extensive manual intervention and can be fraught with inaccuracies. In contrast, the proposed model utilizes state-of-the-art algorithms, enabling rapid identification and remediation of weaknesses within network architectures. This paradigm shift could empower organizations to address vulnerabilities faster than ever before, thereby reducing their risk exposure significantly.</p>
<p>Deep neural networks, a subset of artificial intelligence, play a pivotal role in the success of this model. These networks are structured to simulate the complexity of human brain functions, allowing them to learn from vast amounts of data. In the context of network security, this means that the model can analyze the interplay of various network features, identify patterns indicative of vulnerabilities, and predict potential exploitations. The ability of deep neural networks to process and interpret complex datasets makes them an invaluable tool in the realm of cybersecurity.</p>
<p>The authors of the study highlight the importance of leveraging vast amounts of data to train the neural network effectively. By utilizing datasets that encompass a broad spectrum of network configurations, the model can learn to differentiate between normal and anomalous behavior within various environments. This training phase is critical; it equips the model with the skill set required to recognize threats in real-time scenarios, thus enhancing overall network resilience.</p>
<p>Central to the approach presented by Luo and Liang is the model&#8217;s ability not only to detect vulnerabilities but also to suggest immediate repair methods. This dual functionality addresses a chronic pain point in cybersecurity: the often lengthy and cumbersome process of patching identified vulnerabilities. The study indicates that upon detecting a vulnerability, the model can trigger automatic protocols that guide system administrators through the repair process, thereby minimizing downtime and potential damage.</p>
<p>Moreover, the research dives into the specifics of how deep learning frameworks can be tailored to accommodate the unique characteristics of different organizational networks. By focusing on various architectures, including cloud-based systems and traditional on-premises setups, the model ensures adaptability and relevance across industries. This versatility allows organizations from various sectors, including finance, healthcare, and government, to implement the model within their existing cybersecurity frameworks seamlessly.</p>
<p>Empirical tests revealed that the vulnerability detection and repair model showcased significantly higher accuracy rates compared to conventional methods. Results from real-world applications suggest that organizations utilizing this model can reduce their vulnerability management timeframe significantly. Faster detection and repair not only bolster an organization&#8217;s security posture but also enhance stakeholder trust by demonstrating a commitment to robust cybersecurity measures.</p>
<p>Additionally, as the security landscape continuously evolves, the ongoing learning capability of the deep neural network ensures that the model remains effective against newly emerging threats. Continuous training with fresh sets of data enables the model to adapt to the rapidly changing methods utilized by cybercriminals. This proactive stance is essential in a landscape marked by constant innovation in attack vectors and methodologies.</p>
<p>Leadership in embracing such advanced technologies could also prove beneficial for organizations seeking a competitive edge. In today&#8217;s landscape, where data breaches can severely damage an organization’s reputation, leveraging cutting-edge technology to secure networks illustrates a forward-thinking approach. This not only aids in protecting sensitive data but also serves as a strong marketing point, showcasing an organization’s commitment to safeguarding client information.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the integration of this model addresses regulatory compliance matters as well. Organizations are increasingly scrutinized regarding their cybersecurity protocols, and demonstrating a proactive approach to vulnerability detection can help meet compliance requirements. As data protection regulations evolve, the necessity for comprehensive risk management strategies will only intensify.</p>
<p>As cybersecurity threats continue to be an ever-present danger, the work of Luo and Liang stands as a testament to the potential of emerging technologies in this field. Their research is not just about advancements in deep learning technologies but reflects a broader movement toward smarter, more resilient cybersecurity solutions. Organizations that embrace these changes can prepare for future challenges, transforming their approach to cybersecurity from reactive to proactive.</p>
<p>Looking ahead, the implications of this research could shape the future of network security significantly. As further developments in artificial intelligence emerge, we can anticipate even more sophisticated solutions that will streamline security management processes, provide unprecedented insights into network health, and facilitate an ironclad defense against cyber threats. The work done by Luo and Liang is merely the beginning of what could evolve into a new standard for network security across all industries.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the integration of deep learning into network security strategies promises tremendous benefits for organizations striving for robust defense mechanisms against an ever-evolving threat landscape. Luo and Liang&#8217;s innovative model represents a leap forward in developing effective tools for vulnerability detection and resolution, showcasing the transformative power of technology in creating safer digital environments for all stakeholders.</p>
<hr />
<p><strong>Subject of Research</strong>: Network Security Vulnerability Detection and Repair using Deep Neural Networks</p>
<p><strong>Article Title</strong>: Network security vulnerability detection and repair model based on deep neural networks.</p>
<p><strong>Article References</strong>:</p>
<p class="c-bibliographic-information__citation">Luo, M., Liang, Y. Network security vulnerability detection and repair model based on deep neural networks.<br />
                    <i>Discov Artif Intell</i>  (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00666-2</p>
<p><strong>Image Credits</strong>: AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI</strong>: 10.1007/s44163-025-00666-2</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Network Security, Vulnerability Detection, Deep Neural Networks, Threat Mitigation, Cybersecurity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">117783</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
